XPost: alt.activism, us.military.national-guard, ca.politics
XPost: sac.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-06-07/what-is-title-10- trump-homan-national-guard

President Trump is deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles, despite objections from Gov. Gavin Newsom, by invoking presidential powers that
have only rarely been used.

A leading constitutional scholar said it is “chilling” for the president
to take over the California National Guard to put down protests.
The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops
were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he
opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have
been invoked only rarely.

Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that
he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision
called Title 10 to “temporarily protect ICE and other United States
Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.”

What is Title 10?
Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal
service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard
members in the United States or abroad.

Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation’s leading constitutional law
scholars, said “for the federal government to take over the California
National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests
is truly chilling.”

“It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,” said Chemerinsky,
dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. “It certainly sends a message as to
how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very
frightening to see this done.”

Tom Homan, the Trump administration’s “border czar,” announced the plan to
send the National Guard in an interview Saturday on Fox News as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids.

“This is about enforcing the law,” Homan said. “We’re not going to
apologize for doing it. We’re stepping up.”

“We’re already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,” he added.
“We’re gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We’re gonna continue
doing our job. We’re gonna push back on these people.”

Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement
was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was “purposefully inflammatory” and would “only escalate tensions.”

The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor’s office.

Other rarely used powers
Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to
deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants.

The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize
the National Guard units of states to suppress “any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” that “so hinders the
execution of the laws” that any portion of the state’s inhabitants are
deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right.

The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump’s use of the
military domestically would be misguided and dangerous.

According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under
the law from providing “direct assistance” to civilian law enforcement —
under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus
Act.

The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the
prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act.

In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy
troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent
mob.

Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act “to
activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border
or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary,
and wrong.”

Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state’s National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances in which there
are no other alternatives to maintain the peace.

Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking “to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.”

In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W.
Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after
police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was
under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to
use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it.


--
November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look
forward to America being great again.

We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Every day is an IQ test. Some pass, some, not so much.

Thank you for cleaning up the disasters of the 2008-2017, 2020-2024 Obama
/ Biden / Harris fiascos, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)