XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

On 6/27/2025 1:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

In article <103ks9s$3opqm$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...

On 2025-06-26 18:24, AlleyCat wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:27:10 -0700, Alan says...

Nope. The cellphone version starts with him pushing forward then gets >>>>> shoved back.

No. It does not. It doesn't show a single frame of him moving toward Noem. >>>>

Yes, it do too.

Nope.

That's a fact.

No it's not.

Sorry, but it really is.

That's your fucking OPINION, because you don't REALLY know what Padilla would have done, had he
been let go and the chairs not there.

https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4

LOGIC, which your Simp ass doesn't seem to grasp, dictates, that Padilla was wanting to go back to
what he was doing, hence the, "I have questions for the Secretary."

https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4

You can PLAINLY see where he was struggling to get to. You can see Noem in the background and
simple geometry dictates, it was the direction Padilla was trying to LUNGE back to.

There's no doubt that he was resisting being removed...

...but no evidence that he was ever acting in an aggressive manner by
moving towards Noem.

He was wrong and

He was not wrong. He didn't go far enough. He should have called Noem the HIV-oozing lying Nazi whore that she is.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)