Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
Hi all, I'm looking for a cheap laptop that'll be on 24/7, but mostly
doing nothing. My present kit (a pi4 server) is to be replaced: it uses about 5W quiescent mains power, and I'd like to replace with similar or lower power in x86 so I can get more crunch power under freebsd.
I don't think there's any x86-64 silicon that can compete with Arm for
power efficiency. Especially not older generations. Low TDP envelopes used
to be around 45W for mobile chips. Maybe 15W for ultra-low (i.e. crippled) chips, iirc.
I wondered about a Dell Latitude E6440 -- cheap off amazon and runs
linux -- but I can't find anything at all about real-world power consumption.
The screen will be the highest power draw so disabling it or turning it off will reduce consumption below most real world examples where ppl are using
it as a laptop.
I know my cheap Dell I use runs at about 4-6W when idle, so there's
hope. But can anyone offer a figure please -- or suggest a better alternative?
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
Hi all, I'm looking for a cheap laptop that'll be on 24/7, but mostly
doing nothing. My present kit (a pi4 server) is to be replaced: it uses
about 5W quiescent mains power, and I'd like to replace with similar or
lower power in x86 so I can get more crunch power under freebsd.
I don't think there's any x86-64 silicon that can compete with Arm for
power efficiency. Especially not older generations. Low TDP envelopes used >> to be around 45W for mobile chips. Maybe 15W for ultra-low (i.e. crippled) >> chips, iirc.
TDP is the maximum power the chip can take continuously, the OP is concerned with the minimum power. TDP is more related to horsepower and cooling performance. For a light-use server you are concerned with idle power because that's where most of the electricity goes.
Idle power is often about the other devices on the board as well as the processor. The chipset, peripherals, etc.
I wondered about a Dell Latitude E6440 -- cheap off amazon and runs
linux -- but I can't find anything at all about real-world power
consumption.
The screen will be the highest power draw so disabling it or turning it off >> will reduce consumption below most real world examples where ppl are using >> it as a laptop.
Idle power on laptops is difficult because people don't tend to run them
24/7 with the screen off. Typical benchmarks are playing Youtube with the screen at a fixed brightness, where as you say the screen is a big power consumer.
Also there's a battery so it's not as straightforward to measure the power consumption, which means nobody really quotes those numbers.
Plus laptops are often compromised as servers because the cooling assumes they're on a desk with the lid open. If you try to run them with the lid closed the cooling suffers dramatically and they tend to cook the battery. You really want them open with free air all around - running them on the
side as an 'open book' or upside down as a 'tent' achieves it but is awkward to store like that. If they overheat the CPU will throttle and lose performance.
I know my cheap Dell I use runs at about 4-6W when idle, so there's
hope. But can anyone offer a figure please -- or suggest a better
alternative?
Do you actually need a laptop, or would a mini PC do? They're designed to run 24/7 and with proper cooling.
Also laptops tend to have more weird hardware that might not play nicely
with FreeBSD. eg wifi might not work, while a mini PC will have ethernet.
Theo
On 21/06/2025 11:29, Theo wrote:....
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
Hi all, I'm looking for a cheap laptop that'll be on 24/7, but mostly
doing nothing. My present kit (a pi4 server) is to be replaced: it uses >>>> about 5W quiescent mains power, and I'd like to replace with similar or >>>> lower power in x86 so I can get more crunch power under freebsd.
Also laptops tend to have more weird hardware that might not play nicely
with FreeBSD. eg wifi might not work, while a mini PC will have
ethernet.
Don't really care about wifi - it sits right next to my internet router
so wire is better. When my mini blew up, I just plugged its hd into a
spare laptop, changed a device name or two, and it Just Worked. (Try
that with a windows machine :-) ) But I can't remember about wifi.
I'll try the e6440 and come back with some figures.
On 21/06/2025 15:30, Mike Scott wrote:
I'll try the e6440 and come back with some figures.
Well, I tried. The laptop arrived - extremely well packed, and not
looking too bad physically. However, it's doa, so back it goes. Can't
even check power usage :-(
I'll use the chance to rethink things.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 55:17:49 |
Calls: | 10,397 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 14,067 |
Messages: | 6,417,425 |
Posted today: | 1 |