• John Hill should read this!

    From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 7 12:30:42 2023
    Everyone messes up. Here’s how to say you’re sorry.

    https://www.vox.com/even-better/23622442/saying-sorry-apologize

    When /not/ to apologize

    There are seemingly endless situations calling for an apology — plenty
    of ways to screw up, piss people off, or offend — but a few
    circumstances when you don’t need to change a thing. Women and girls,
    who are famously maligned for apologizing too frequently, should stop apologizing for apologizing, Ingall says. “We have to be really careful
    about not over-policing women’s speech and not telling women that the
    way they talk — whether that’s vocal fry, or rise in inflection at the
    end of the sentence, or apologizing — is wrong,” she says, “because sometimes there are things we just got to do to make it through the day
    and to make our life easier.”

    Never apologize for existing, taking space, and living your authentic
    self. That’s the version of unapologetic worth aspiring to.

    “It’s appropriate to apologize for things that you do or say,” McCarthy says. “You don’t have to apologize for who you are.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to John Hill on Thu Mar 9 11:13:29 2023
    On 09/03/2023 11:00, John Hill wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2023 at 12:30:42 GMT, "David Brooks" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    Everyone messes up. Here’s how to say you’re sorry.

    https://www.vox.com/even-better/23622442/saying-sorry-apologize

    When /not/ to apologize

    There are seemingly endless situations calling for an apology — plenty
    of ways to screw up, piss people off, or offend — but a few
    circumstances when you don’t need to change a thing. Women and girls,
    who are famously maligned for apologizing too frequently, should stop
    apologizing for apologizing, Ingall says. “We have to be really careful
    about not over-policing women’s speech and not telling women that the
    way they talk — whether that’s vocal fry, or rise in inflection at the >> end of the sentence, or apologizing — is wrong,” she says, “because
    sometimes there are things we just got to do to make it through the day
    and to make our life easier.”

    Never apologize for existing, taking space, and living your authentic
    self. That’s the version of unapologetic worth aspiring to.

    “It’s appropriate to apologize for things that you do or say,” McCarthy
    says. “*You don’t have to apologize for who you are*.”

    <p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 32px; line-height: normal; font-family: "Apple Color Emoji";">⁉️</p>


    Hello John

    I had thought - hoped - that you might explain why you think that there
    are two versions of me.

    More importantly, perhaps, explain why most folk in this group refuse to interact with either one of me!

    --
    With kind regards,
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 9 11:00:29 2023
    On 7 Mar 2023 at 12:30:42 GMT, "David Brooks" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
    wrote:

    Everyone messes up. Here’s how to say you’re sorry.

    https://www.vox.com/even-better/23622442/saying-sorry-apologize

    When /not/ to apologize

    There are seemingly endless situations calling for an apology — plenty
    of ways to screw up, piss people off, or offend — but a few
    circumstances when you don’t need to change a thing. Women and girls,
    who are famously maligned for apologizing too frequently, should stop apologizing for apologizing, Ingall says. “We have to be really careful about not over-policing women’s speech and not telling women that the
    way they talk — whether that’s vocal fry, or rise in inflection at the end of the sentence, or apologizing — is wrong,” she says, “because sometimes there are things we just got to do to make it through the day
    and to make our life easier.”

    Never apologize for existing, taking space, and living your authentic
    self. That’s the version of unapologetic worth aspiring to.

    “It’s appropriate to apologize for things that you do or say,” McCarthy says. “You don’t have to apologize for who you are.”

    <p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 32px; line-height: normal; font-family: "Apple Color Emoji";">⁉️</p>
    --
    An infinitely complex system can fail in an infinite number of ways.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 9 12:14:57 2023
    On 9 Mar 2023 at 11:13:29 GMT, "David Brooks" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
    wrote:

    On 09/03/2023 11:00, John Hill wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2023 at 12:30:42 GMT, "David Brooks" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
    wrote:

    Everyone messes up. Here’s how to say you’re sorry.

    https://www.vox.com/even-better/23622442/saying-sorry-apologize

    When /not/ to apologize

    There are seemingly endless situations calling for an apology — plenty >>> of ways to screw up, piss people off, or offend — but a few
    circumstances when you don’t need to change a thing. Women and girls,
    who are famously maligned for apologizing too frequently, should stop
    apologizing for apologizing, Ingall says. “We have to be really careful >>> about not over-policing women’s speech and not telling women that the
    way they talk — whether that’s vocal fry, or rise in inflection at the >>> end of the sentence, or apologizing — is wrong,” she says, “because >>> sometimes there are things we just got to do to make it through the day
    and to make our life easier.”

    Never apologize for existing, taking space, and living your authentic
    self. That’s the version of unapologetic worth aspiring to.

    “It’s appropriate to apologize for things that you do or say,” McCarthy
    says. “*You don’t have to apologize for who you are*.”

    <p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 32px; line-height:
    normal;font-family: "Apple Color Emoji";">⁉️



    Hello John

    I had thought - hoped - that you might explain why you think that there
    are two versions of me.

    More importantly, perhaps, explain why most folk in this group refuse to interact with either one of me!

    I was a physics, not a psychiatrist. I claim no expert knowledge. But it seems to me that when you mount your hobby-horse you react differently from when you are walking.

    As for your other question, who knows? Perhaps they lack patience. The hobby-horse rider bores them to tears and they just switch off when they see your name, or worse come up with a knee-jerk reaction.

    John.
    --
    Mony a mickle makes a muckle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whisky-dave@21:1/5 to John Hill on Thu Mar 9 05:00:42 2023
    On Thursday, 9 March 2023 at 12:14:58 UTC, John Hill wrote:
    On 9 Mar 2023 at 11:13:29 GMT, "David Brooks" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 09/03/2023 11:00, John Hill wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2023 at 12:30:42 GMT, "David Brooks" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> >> wrote:

    Everyone messes up. Here’s how to say you’re sorry.

    https://www.vox.com/even-better/23622442/saying-sorry-apologize

    When /not/ to apologize

    There are seemingly endless situations calling for an apology — plenty >>> of ways to screw up, piss people off, or offend — but a few
    circumstances when you don’t need to change a thing. Women and girls, >>> who are famously maligned for apologizing too frequently, should stop >>> apologizing for apologizing, Ingall says. “We have to be really careful
    about not over-policing women’s speech and not telling women that the >>> way they talk — whether that’s vocal fry, or rise in inflection at the
    end of the sentence, or apologizing — is wrong,” she says, “because
    sometimes there are things we just got to do to make it through the day >>> and to make our life easier.”

    Never apologize for existing, taking space, and living your authentic >>> self. That’s the version of unapologetic worth aspiring to.

    “It’s appropriate to apologize for things that you do or say,” McCarthy
    says. “*You don’t have to apologize for who you are*.”

    <p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 32px; line-height:
    normal;font-family: "Apple Color Emoji";">⁉️



    Hello John

    I had thought - hoped - that you might explain why you think that there are two versions of me.

    More importantly, perhaps, explain why most folk in this group refuse to interact with either one of me!
    I was a physics, not a psychiatrist. I claim no expert knowledge. But it seems
    to me that when you mount your hobby-horse you react differently from when you
    are walking.

    As for your other question, who knows? Perhaps they lack patience. The hobby-horse rider bores them to tears and they just switch off when they see your name, or worse come up with a knee-jerk reaction.

    A bit like me when I see a story regarding the ginger twat and Meghan .


    John.
    --
    Mony a mickle makes a muckle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to whisky-dave on Thu Mar 9 13:23:42 2023
    On 09/03/2023 13:00, whisky-dave wrote:
    On Thursday, 9 March 2023 at 12:14:58 UTC, John Hill wrote:
    On 9 Mar 2023 at 11:13:29 GMT, "David Brooks" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
    wrote:

    On 09/03/2023 11:00, John Hill wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2023 at 12:30:42 GMT, "David Brooks" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> >>>> wrote:

    Everyone messes up. Here’s how to say you’re sorry.

    https://www.vox.com/even-better/23622442/saying-sorry-apologize

    When /not/ to apologize

    There are seemingly endless situations calling for an apology — plenty >>>>> of ways to screw up, piss people off, or offend — but a few
    circumstances when you don’t need to change a thing. Women and girls, >>>>> who are famously maligned for apologizing too frequently, should stop >>>>> apologizing for apologizing, Ingall says. “We have to be really careful >>>>> about not over-policing women’s speech and not telling women that the >>>>> way they talk — whether that’s vocal fry, or rise in inflection at the
    end of the sentence, or apologizing — is wrong,” she says, “because >>>>> sometimes there are things we just got to do to make it through the day >>>>> and to make our life easier.”

    Never apologize for existing, taking space, and living your authentic >>>>> self. That’s the version of unapologetic worth aspiring to.

    “It’s appropriate to apologize for things that you do or say,” McCarthy
    says. “*You don’t have to apologize for who you are*.”

    <p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 32px; line-height:
    normal;font-family: "Apple Color Emoji";">⁉️
    </p>


    Hello John

    I had thought - hoped - that you might explain why you think that there
    are two versions of me.

    More importantly, perhaps, explain why most folk in this group refuse to >>> interact with either one of me!
    I was a physics, not a psychiatrist. I claim no expert knowledge. But it seems
    to me that when you mount your hobby-horse you react differently from when you
    are walking.

    As for your other question, who knows? Perhaps they lack patience. The
    hobby-horse rider bores them to tears and they just switch off when they see >> your name, or worse come up with a knee-jerk reaction.

    A bit like me when I see a story regarding the ginger twat and Meghan .

    Hmmm. Was this a much busier group in years gone by - say 10+ years ago?

    Was 'talk' back then more interesting and diverse?

    Perhaps you'd like to start a thread on a subject of your choosing?

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whisky-dave@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Mar 10 05:19:20 2023
    On Thursday, 9 March 2023 at 13:23:45 UTC, David Brooks wrote:
    On 09/03/2023 13:00, whisky-dave wrote:
    On Thursday, 9 March 2023 at 12:14:58 UTC, John Hill wrote:
    On 9 Mar 2023 at 11:13:29 GMT, "David Brooks" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> >> wrote:

    On 09/03/2023 11:00, John Hill wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2023 at 12:30:42 GMT, "David Brooks" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
    wrote:

    Everyone messes up. Here’s how to say you’re sorry.

    https://www.vox.com/even-better/23622442/saying-sorry-apologize

    When /not/ to apologize

    There are seemingly endless situations calling for an apology — plenty
    of ways to screw up, piss people off, or offend — but a few
    circumstances when you don’t need to change a thing. Women and girls,
    who are famously maligned for apologizing too frequently, should stop >>>>> apologizing for apologizing, Ingall says. “We have to be really careful
    about not over-policing women’s speech and not telling women that the
    way they talk — whether that’s vocal fry, or rise in inflection at the
    end of the sentence, or apologizing — is wrong,” she says, “because
    sometimes there are things we just got to do to make it through the day
    and to make our life easier.”

    Never apologize for existing, taking space, and living your authentic >>>>> self. That’s the version of unapologetic worth aspiring to.

    “It’s appropriate to apologize for things that you do or say,” McCarthy
    says. “*You don’t have to apologize for who you are*.”

    <p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 32px; line-height:
    normal;font-family: "Apple Color Emoji";">⁉️
    </p>


    Hello John

    I had thought - hoped - that you might explain why you think that there >>> are two versions of me.

    More importantly, perhaps, explain why most folk in this group refuse to >>> interact with either one of me!
    I was a physics, not a psychiatrist. I claim no expert knowledge. But it seems
    to me that when you mount your hobby-horse you react differently from when you
    are walking.

    As for your other question, who knows? Perhaps they lack patience. The
    hobby-horse rider bores them to tears and they just switch off when they see
    your name, or worse come up with a knee-jerk reaction.

    A bit like me when I see a story regarding the ginger twat and Meghan .
    Hmmm. Was this a much busier group in years gone by - say 10+ years ago?

    yes , the same with most groups as there;s many other ways such as twatter, arseface
    and so many other platforms that have some advantages .


    Was 'talk' back then more interesting and diverse?

    Not diverse , but more interesting as it was about computers and software , and the days when you could mess about with hardware
    as it was less complex.


    Perhaps you'd like to start a thread on a subject of your choosing?

    well how about the AI sex dolls and is there a away to install OS X on them, and can they be programmed to do the dishes :-)



    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)