• Re: Interpret this sentence

    From Ross Clark@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 15:50:20 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 14/04/2023 3:25 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the
    fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html


    Simple version:
    In 2020, Apple made an announcement. Many had predicted [that] it [this announcement] would arrive, but that didn't make it any less shocking.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 14 04:25:44 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 13 22:11:11 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    T24gNC8xMy8yMyAyMDoyNSwgQ29tbWFuZGVyIEtpbnNleSB3cm90ZToNCj4gIkluIDIwMjAs IEFwcGxlIG1hZGUgYW4gYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50IHRoYXQgd2FzIG5vIGxlc3Mgc2hvY2tpbmcg Zm9yIHRoZSANCj4gZmFjdCB0aGF0IG1hbnkgaGFkIHByZWRpY3RlZCBpdCB3b3VsZCBhcnJp dmUiDQo+IA0KPiBJIGNhbid0IGV2ZW4gYmVnaW4gdG8gd29yayBvdXQgd2hhdCB0aGF0J3Mg bWVhbnQgdG8gbWVhbiHCoCBIYXZlIA0KPiByZXBvcnRlcnMgbG9zdCB0aGUgYWJpbGl0eSB0 byBjb21tdW5pY2F0ZSBjbGVhcmx5Pw0KPiANCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaW5kZXBlbmRlbnQu Y28udWsvdGVjaC9hcHBsZS1tYWMtc2lsaWNvbi1jb21wdXRlci1jaGlwLW5ldy1iMjMxOTM1 Ni5odG1sDQoNCg0KV2h5IEtpbnNleSwNCg0KRXZlcnlvbmUga25vdyB0aGF0IG1lYW5zICJB cHBsZSBpcyBwdXR0aW5nIHRvZ2V0aGVyDQpzbG9nYW5zIGxpa2UgdGhhdCB0byBwdXQgaW50 byBzZW50ZW5jZXMgd2hpbHN0DQpkYW5jaW5nIG9uIHZlcnkgdGhpbiBpY2Ugd2VhcmluZyBE b2MgTWFydGVucw0KYW5kIGEgYmFja3BhY2sgZmlsbGVkIHRvIHBvaW50IG9mIGJ1cnN0aW5n IHdpdGgNCnR1bmdzdGVuIGJhcnMgd2hpbGUgYmFsYW5jaW5nIGJ1Y2tldHMgb2YgYm9pbGlu Zw0Kd2F0ZXIgb24gdGhlIHRpcCBvZiB0aGVpciBub3NlcyBhbmQgYWxzbyBmb3Igc29tZQ0K cmVhc29uIHRoZXJlIGFyZSBzaGFya3MgYmVsb3cgdGhlIGljZSAuLi4iDQoNCkdlZXosIGRv IEkgaGF2ZSB0byBpbnRlcnByZXQgZXZlcnl0aGluZyBmb3IgeW91Pz8/Pw0KDQo=

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 04:30:44 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and they were pretty amazing.

    Have reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html


    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 08:13:38 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the
    fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!  Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Snit on Fri Apr 14 08:01:28 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact >> that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things. It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving forwards.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Ross Clark on Fri Apr 14 08:00:40 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 04:50:20 +0100, Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 3:25 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the
    fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html


    Simple version:
    In 2020, Apple made an announcement. Many had predicted [that] it [this announcement] would arrive, but that didn't make it any less shocking.

    I think what they meant to write was:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for [those who] had predicted it would arrive"

    "The fact that many" just doesn't make sense where I replaced it with [].

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Apr 14 08:24:26 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the
    fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 09:01:27 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 14/04/2023 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks
    <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the
    fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!  Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products
    available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars
    and engines!

    You have no idea how I used to yearn for B&O products to listen to music
    - sadly, now that my hearing has deteriorated, they would be a total
    waste of money. Yes, REALLY sad, I know. 🙁

    https://www.coggles.com/life/tech/is-bang-and-olufsen-worth-it/

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Apr 14 11:07:33 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:01:27 +0100, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks
    <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the >>>> fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars
    and engines!

    Yeah, my neighbour says that about her BMW which keeps going wrong.

    Apple electronics is not better, it's just the same, but more expensive and less compatible.

    You have no idea how I used to yearn for B&O products to listen to music
    - sadly, now that my hearing has deteriorated, they would be a total
    waste of money. Yes, REALLY sad, I know. 🙁

    https://www.coggles.com/life/tech/is-bang-and-olufsen-worth-it/

    B&O does look nice (like Apple, nice for an ornament), but you can get the same sound quality a lot cheaper. I have heard B&O products, I have perfect hearing (of a 16 year old) according to a doctor, and I'm very fussy about sound quality. Yet I
    wouldn't prefer a B&O over something else (excepting cheap shit of course).

    That webpage is clearly written by someone getting paid to. The language used is just like an advert.

    But I would like owning something with the word Bang in the name.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whisky-dave@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 05:32:38 2023
    On Friday, 14 April 2023 at 11:07:37 UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:01:27 +0100, David Brooks <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks
    <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the >>>> fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars and engines!
    Yeah, my neighbour says that about her BMW which keeps going wrong.

    Maybe it's just her BMW . I mean some people have cars whose breaks don't work properly.



    Apple electronics is not better, it's just the same, but more expensive and less compatible.

    Not true Apple products tend to last longer and have a longer life span.
    You just have to look at ebay and compare the prices.
    Just like most things the components that make up whole product is the important point.


    You have no idea how I used to yearn for B&O products to listen to music
    - sadly, now that my hearing has deteriorated, they would be a total
    waste of money. Yes, REALLY sad, I know. 🙁

    https://www.coggles.com/life/tech/is-bang-and-olufsen-worth-it/
    B&O does look nice (like Apple, nice for an ornament), but you can get the same sound quality a lot cheaper.

    Not really , while plastic might last a long time in the ocean , you don't see plastic rings selling for much, peolpe seem to prefer teh precious metals.


    I have heard B&O products, I have perfect hearing (of a 16 year old) according to a doctor,

    are you sure you don't me your Psychiatrist?

    and I'm very fussy about sound quality. Yet I wouldn't prefer a B&O over something else (excepting cheap shit of course).

    I like the look of B&O or rather I used to in the mid 80s.
    But what is this cheap shit I thought you claimed products were the same and that the only differnce was the price


    That webpage is clearly written by someone getting paid to. The language used is just like an advert.

    Wow a journalist getting paid to write stuff who's ever heard of such a strange thing.

    yuo'll be tellikng me next that you work at a school and get paid for it.



    But I would like owning something with the word Bang in the name.

    why not name your car shitty-shitty bang-bang

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 13:21:38 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 14/04/2023 11:07, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:01:27 +0100, David Brooks
    <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks
    <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the >>>>> fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!  Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products
    available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars
    and engines!

    Yeah, my neighbour says that about her BMW which keeps going wrong.

    One cannot compare a BMW with a Rolls Royce!!!

    Apple electronics is not better, it's just the same, but more expensive
    and less compatible.

    I don't believe Apple manufactured electronics parts are simply
    'ordinary'. I suspect they'll be better than average quality.

    You have no idea how I used to yearn for B&O products to listen to music
    - sadly, now that my hearing has deteriorated, they would be a total
    waste of money. Yes, REALLY sad, I know. 🙁

    https://www.coggles.com/life/tech/is-bang-and-olufsen-worth-it/

    B&O does look nice (like Apple, nice for an ornament), but you can get
    the same sound quality a lot cheaper.  I have heard B&O products, I have perfect hearing (of a 16 year old) according to a doctor, and I'm very
    fussy about sound quality.  Yet I wouldn't prefer a B&O over something
    else (excepting cheap shit of course).

    Each to their own!

    That webpage is clearly written by someone getting paid to.  The
    language used is just like an advert.

    Agreed.

    But I would like owning something with the word Bang in the name.

    Haha! :-D

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Apr 14 14:43:09 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:21:38 +0100, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 11:07, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:01:27 +0100, David Brooks
    <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks
    <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the >>>>>> fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products
    available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars >>> and engines!

    Yeah, my neighbour says that about her BMW which keeps going wrong.

    One cannot compare a BMW with a Rolls Royce!!!

    Indeed, a BMW is overpriced, a Rolls Royce is vastly overpriced.

    Apple electronics is not better, it's just the same, but more expensive
    and less compatible.

    I don't believe Apple manufactured electronics parts are simply
    'ordinary'. I suspect they'll be better than average quality.

    They're not even in the top ten, which are:

    #1 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM)
    Revenue (TTM): $71.66 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $30.53 billion

    #2 Intel Corp. (INTC)
    Revenue (TTM): $69.54 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $13.30 billion

    #3 Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM)
    Revenue (TTM): $42.10 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $12.94 billion

    #4 Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)
    Revenue (TTM): $33.20 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $11.50 billion

    #5 Micron Technology Inc. (MU)
    Revenue (TTM): $30.76 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $8.69 billion

    #6 NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA)
    Revenue (TTM): $28.57 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $5.96 billion

    #7 Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT)
    Revenue (TTM): $25.79 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $6.53 billion

    #8 ASE Technology Holding Co. Ltd. (ASX)
    Revenue (TTM): $23.04 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $2.69 billion

    #9 Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)
    Revenue (TTM): $22.83 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $2.27 billion

    #10 ASML Holding N.V. (ASML)
    Revenue (TTM): $21.27 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $5.85 billion

    https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/012216/worlds-top-10-semiconductor-companies-tsmintc.asp

    You have no idea how I used to yearn for B&O products to listen to music >>> - sadly, now that my hearing has deteriorated, they would be a total
    waste of money. Yes, REALLY sad, I know. 🙁

    https://www.coggles.com/life/tech/is-bang-and-olufsen-worth-it/

    B&O does look nice (like Apple, nice for an ornament), but you can get
    the same sound quality a lot cheaper. I have heard B&O products, I have
    perfect hearing (of a 16 year old) according to a doctor, and I'm very
    fussy about sound quality. Yet I wouldn't prefer a B&O over something
    else (excepting cheap shit of course).

    Each to their own!

    I'm objective.

    That webpage is clearly written by someone getting paid to. The
    language used is just like an advert.

    Agreed.

    Then you shouldn't have used it to further your side of the argument!

    But I would like owning something with the word Bang in the name.

    Haha! :-D

    There is actually a company called banggood. And they're not as shit as they sound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to CK1@nospam.com on Fri Apr 14 09:57:18 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    In article <op.13d8d7jhmvhs6z@ryzen.home>, Commander Kinsey
    <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:


    Apple electronics is not better, it's just the same, but more expensive
    and less compatible.

    I don't believe Apple manufactured electronics parts are simply
    'ordinary'. I suspect they'll be better than average quality.

    They're not even in the top ten, which are:

    apple is a fabless chip designer, much like amd and many others.

    #1 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM)
    Revenue (TTM): $71.66 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $30.53 billion

    <https://www.extremetech.com/computing/343291-apple-has-procured-tsmcs-e ntire-first-run-of-3nm-chips>
    Apple Has Procured TSMC's Entire First Run of 3nm Chips

    previously, <https://wccftech.com/apple-secured-80-tsmc-5nm-production-capacity-2021

    Apple Has Secured 80 Percent of TSMC's 5nm Production Capacity
    for 2021

    80% of 5nm chips. 100% of 3nm chips.



    I'm objective.

    not the word that first comes to mind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 13:58:58 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact >>> that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few >> thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and
    they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips, and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer?

    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving forwards.

    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to whisky-dave on Fri Apr 14 09:57:16 2023
    In article <f4779665-332f-48b4-aad2-82b3b01d4044n@googlegroups.com>, whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com> wrote:

    Maybe it's just her BMW . I mean some people have cars whose breaks don't work properly.

    so they do break.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whisky-dave@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 09:08:29 2023
    On Friday, 14 April 2023 at 14:43:14 UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:21:38 +0100, David Brooks <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 11:07, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:01:27 +0100, David Brooks
    <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks
    <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the
    fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products >>> available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars >>> and engines!

    Yeah, my neighbour says that about her BMW which keeps going wrong.

    One cannot compare a BMW with a Rolls Royce!!!
    Indeed, a BMW is overpriced, a Rolls Royce is vastly overpriced.
    Apple electronics is not better, it's just the same, but more expensive >> and less compatible.

    I don't believe Apple manufactured electronics parts are simply 'ordinary'. I suspect they'll be better than average quality.
    They're not even in the top ten, which are:

    Talking shit again, well practice makes perfect doesn't it ;-)

    https://www.investopedia.com/apple-becomes-first-3-trillion-dollar-company-5214650

    Do yuo know whay there;s more dog shit on pavements than gold ?

    #1 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM)
    Revenue (TTM): $71.66 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $30.53 billion

    #2 Intel Corp. (INTC)
    Revenue (TTM): $69.54 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $13.30 billion

    #3 Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM)
    Revenue (TTM): $42.10 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $12.94 billion

    #4 Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)
    Revenue (TTM): $33.20 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $11.50 billion

    #5 Micron Technology Inc. (MU)
    Revenue (TTM): $30.76 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $8.69 billion

    #6 NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA)
    Revenue (TTM): $28.57 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $5.96 billion

    #7 Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT)
    Revenue (TTM): $25.79 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $6.53 billion

    #8 ASE Technology Holding Co. Ltd. (ASX)
    Revenue (TTM): $23.04 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $2.69 billion

    #9 Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)
    Revenue (TTM): $22.83 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $2.27 billion

    #10 ASML Holding N.V. (ASML)
    Revenue (TTM): $21.27 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $5.85 billion

    https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/012216/worlds-top-10-semiconductor-companies-tsmintc.asp
    You have no idea how I used to yearn for B&O products to listen to music >>> - sadly, now that my hearing has deteriorated, they would be a total
    waste of money. Yes, REALLY sad, I know. 🙁

    https://www.coggles.com/life/tech/is-bang-and-olufsen-worth-it/

    B&O does look nice (like Apple, nice for an ornament), but you can get
    the same sound quality a lot cheaper. I have heard B&O products, I have >> perfect hearing (of a 16 year old) according to a doctor, and I'm very
    fussy about sound quality. Yet I wouldn't prefer a B&O over something
    else (excepting cheap shit of course).

    Each to their own!
    I'm objective.

    I can think of many other words to describe you :-D.

    That webpage is clearly written by someone getting paid to. The
    language used is just like an advert.

    Agreed.
    Then you shouldn't have used it to further your side of the argument!
    But I would like owning something with the word Bang in the name.

    Haha! :-D
    There is actually a company called banggood. And they're not as shit as they sound.

    They're OK at providing cheap stuff, in fact some of their arduinos that were said to be compatable weren't
    with some arduino libraries.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Apr 14 16:42:56 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 14/04/2023 14:57, nospam wrote:
    In article <op.13d8d7jhmvhs6z@ryzen.home>, Commander Kinsey
    <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:


    Apple electronics is not better, it's just the same, but more expensive >>>> and less compatible.

    I don't believe Apple manufactured electronics parts are simply
    'ordinary'. I suspect they'll be better than average quality.

    They're not even in the top ten, which are:

    apple is a fabless chip designer, much like amd and many others.

    I looked that up!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabless_manufacturing

    Thanks. I had no iea about that.

    #1 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM)
    Revenue (TTM): $71.66 billion
    Net Income (TTM): $30.53 billion

    <https://www.extremetech.com/computing/343291-apple-has-procured-tsmcs-e ntire-first-run-of-3nm-chips>
    Apple Has Procured TSMC's Entire First Run of 3nm Chips

    previously, <https://wccftech.com/apple-secured-80-tsmc-5nm-production-capacity-2021

    Apple Has Secured 80 Percent of TSMC's 5nm Production Capacity
    for 2021

    80% of 5nm chips. 100% of 3nm chips.



    I'm objective.

    not the word that first comes to mind.

    :-D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 14 13:14:58 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    In article <u1bvh2$1jqka$4@dont-email.me>, lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca>
    wrote:

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars and engines!

    It would be, if RR insisted on limiting any accessories allowed, to
    those approved by them.

    apple doesn't do that.

    on the other hand, there are parts only available from rolls royce as
    well as other car makers, including toyota, honda, ford, chrysler, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From lar3ryca@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Apr 14 10:37:54 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 2023-04-14 02:01, David Brooks wrote:
    On 14/04/2023 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:13:38 +0100, David Brooks
    <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 14/04/2023 04:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the >>>> fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!  Have
    reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html

    A good article.

    Thanks for sharing. :-)

    Oh no, I've turned on the groups biggest Apple lover.

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars
    and engines!

    It would be, if RR insisted on limiting any accessories allowed, to
    those approved by them.

    You have no idea how I used to yearn for B&O products to listen to music
    - sadly, now that my hearing has deteriorated, they would be a total
    waste of money. Yes, REALLY sad, I know. 🙁

    https://www.coggles.com/life/tech/is-bang-and-olufsen-worth-it/

    --
    What's another word for thesaurus?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joel@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 13:28:35 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean! Have reporters lost the ability to communicate clearly?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/apple-mac-silicon-computer-chip-new-b2319356.html


    When I clicked the link, the context of that quote was exactly what I
    thought, that they surprised the industry, by being the first large
    scale manufacturer, to move away from aging architecture, I dunno how
    you're so in the dark about that.

    --
    Joel Crump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 14 15:07:46 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    In article <u1c690$1l0ff$2@dont-email.me>, lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca>
    wrote:

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products
    available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars >>> and engines!

    It would be, if RR insisted on limiting any accessories allowed, to
    those approved by them.

    apple doesn't do that.

    They certainly do, or attempt to do, when those accessories are programs.

    apple, like many other companies, has a voluntary certification process
    that tests and guarantees a given accessory is fully compatible with
    existing (as well as future unreleased) products and won't cause any
    damage.

    users prefer those accessories because they know they will work and
    won't need to replace it when they upgrade, but under no circumstances
    are they limited to using only those accessories.

    they can choose to use *any* accessory they want, or even cobble their
    own if they are so inclined.

    compare that to hp, where despite having a usb-c port, the hp spectre
    laptop will only charge from an hp spectre power adapter. hp has stated
    that is intentional. dell and razer fare only slightly better: <https://images.techhive.com/images/article/2016/03/usb_c_laptop_chartin g-100649896-orig.png>

    note that these are laptops with industry standard usb-c ports and
    usb-c power adapters.

    only apple and google are compatible with *any* usb-c power adapter.

    on the other hand, there are parts only available from rolls royce as
    well as other car makers, including toyota, honda, ford, chrysler, etc.

    you are ignoring that carmakers have various parts that are *only*
    available from the dealer (no third party alternative) and in some
    cases, certain parts can only be installed by a dealer (no third party
    auto repair shops).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From lar3ryca@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Apr 14 12:33:04 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 2023-04-14 11:14, nospam wrote:
    In article <u1bvh2$1jqka$4@dont-email.me>, lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca>
    wrote:

    I confess that I enjoy being able to afford the best quality products
    available nowadays. Apple is to electronics like Rolls Royce is for cars >>> and engines!

    It would be, if RR insisted on limiting any accessories allowed, to
    those approved by them.

    apple doesn't do that.

    They certainly do, or attempt to do, when those accessories are programs.

    on the other hand, there are parts only available from rolls royce as
    well as other car makers, including toyota, honda, ford, chrysler, etc.

    --
    Chris: Hey can I borrow a ten?
    Kristen: Sure.
    Christen: Thank you.
    Kris: You're welcome.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Snit on Fri Apr 14 20:56:30 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote: >>
    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact
    that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few >>> thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and
    they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every >> other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer has an Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply, crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC users get to choose what they prefer.
    Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should have.

    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer?

    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving
    forwards.

    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same. All the chip companies want to have the latest and greatest to sell their chips. So of course they all do research.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 20:05:56 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:56:30 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13epogn4mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote: >>>
    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact
    that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few
    thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and
    they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every >>> other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.


    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer has an Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply, crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC users get to choose what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should
    have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer?

    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly knows that.

    https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-ceo-we-hope-to-win-back-apple-as-a-chip-customer-one-day

    Does not mean they are ahead in all areas -- the M-series does have
    weaknesses.



    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving
    forwards.

    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    All the chip companies want to have the latest and greatest to sell their chips. So of course they all do research.

    And even with that Apple has pulled ahead. We shall see how long that lasts.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 14 21:13:24 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 2:02:50 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13esq0sxmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 21:05:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:56:30 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13epogn4mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote: >>>
    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact
    that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few
    thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and
    they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every
    other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Yes, it's in their best interests.

    So which one does?


    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and >> in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited.

    Nothing they offer limits you choice. You, in fact, choose to not use them. They have no control over that. Apple offers choices you choose to not use.

    I can plug any piece of hardware I like into this machine, and it'll just work.

    What hardware do you use which does not work on a Mac?


    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer has an
    Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply,
    crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC users get to choose >>> what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should
    have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    No, only cons. Freedom of choice is the ultimate requirement in anything.

    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer?

    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things >>> all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly >> knows that.

    And tomorrow it will be pretty well accepted Apple is behind.

    Pick a date. I mean it will happen at some time -- but the M3 is likely coming out soon. Apple is quite a bit ahead for now. What other PC maker left the others in the dust like this for more than year?

    Notice I didn't add the pointless word "that". Why do people insert it?

    You are questioning why that-clauses exist? Or just why it is used in that example?


    https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-ceo-we-hope-to-win-back-apple-as-a-chip-customer-one-day

    Does not mean they are ahead in all areas -- the M-series does have
    weaknesses.

    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving >>>>> forwards.

    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    Often doesn't matter. What matters is how good the products are. And on average it's pretty much the same.

    Each has pros and cons... but for my use Apple is *generally* ahead. Their UI advantage is, I think, eroding... and that bothers me. I do like their automation options, their relative good use of consistency, and how they let
    me focus on the task and not the tool better than Windows does (though I am also outdated on Windows, so maybe Windows 10/11 has improved).


    All the chip companies want to have the latest and greatest to sell their >>> chips. So of course they all do research.

    And even with that Apple has pulled ahead. We shall see how long that lasts.

    Not long.

    Curious if you have a date when Intel or someone else will generally be seen
    as ahead.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Snit on Fri Apr 14 22:02:50 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 21:05:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:56:30 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13epogn4mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote: >>
    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact
    that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few
    thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and
    they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every
    other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Yes, it's in their best interests.

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like into this machine, and it'll just work.

    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer has an >> Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply,
    crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC users get to choose >> what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should
    have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    No, only cons. Freedom of choice is the ultimate requirement in anything.

    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer?

    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things >> all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly knows that.

    And tomorrow it will be pretty well accepted Apple is behind.

    Notice I didn't add the pointless word "that". Why do people insert it?

    https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-ceo-we-hope-to-win-back-apple-as-a-chip-customer-one-day

    Does not mean they are ahead in all areas -- the M-series does have weaknesses.

    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving
    forwards.

    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    Often doesn't matter. What matters is how good the products are. And on average it's pretty much the same.

    All the chip companies want to have the latest and greatest to sell their >> chips. So of course they all do research.

    And even with that Apple has pulled ahead. We shall see how long that lasts.

    Not long.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Snit on Fri Apr 14 23:17:29 2023
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:56:30 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13epogn4mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for >>>>> the fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own
    chips, few thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips >>>> were introduced and they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though
    every other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.


    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer
    has an Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply, crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC
    users get to choose what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer?

    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly knows that.

    https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-ceo-we-hope-to-win-back-apple-as-a-chip-custo
    mer-one-day

    Does not mean they are ahead in all areas -- the M-series does have weaknesses.



    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving
    forwards.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    All the chip companies want to have the latest and greatest to sell their chips. So of course they all do research.

    And even with that Apple has pulled ahead. We shall see how long that lasts.

    Not really. It is Dutch/German technology by ASML/Zeiss
    that makes it possible.
    (and they have an absolute monopoly on it
    that isnt likely to be broken soon)

    Apple doesn't actually make the chips,
    Samsung and TSMC do that for them, using ASML machinery.
    Apple only designs the chips.

    And ASML will sell their lithography machines to others,
    like for example to Intel. (but not to China)
    So others will catch up,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to CK1@nospam.com on Fri Apr 14 18:26:01 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    In article <op.13esq0sxmvhs6z@ryzen.home>, Commander Kinsey
    <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like into this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com on Fri Apr 14 20:04:04 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    In article <Jwl_L.110625$qpNc.109621@fx03.iad>, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... >>> and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like >> into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs.


    I do think it is fair to say MORE works with PCs, or at least used to.

    the simple fact is that some stuff doesn't work with a pc, most often
    with linux, which many hardware makers do not support.

    sometimes it can be made to work, and there can be compatibility
    issues.

    Certainly PCs are more backward compatible. But I wonder if he actually uses anything that does not work on a Mac.

    of course not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Apr 14 23:41:29 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 3:26:01 PM MST, "nospam" wrote <140420231826015988%nospam@nospam.invalid>:

    In article <op.13esq0sxmvhs6z@ryzen.home>, Commander Kinsey
    <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs.


    I do think it is fair to say MORE works with PCs, or at least used to. Certainly PCs are more backward compatible. But I wonder if he actually uses anything that does not work on a Mac.


    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Apr 15 00:57:15 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 5:04:04 PM MST, "nospam" wrote <140420232004048993%nospam@nospam.invalid>:

    In article <Jwl_L.110625$qpNc.109621@fx03.iad>, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... >>>>> and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like >>>> into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs.


    I do think it is fair to say MORE works with PCs, or at least used to.

    the simple fact is that some stuff doesn't work with a pc, most often
    with linux, which many hardware makers do not support.

    By PC in this context I think the implication is Windows. But fair enough...
    if you had not been following.

    sometimes it can be made to work, and there can be compatibility
    issues.

    Agreed.

    Certainly PCs are more backward compatible. But I wonder if he actually uses >> anything that does not work on a Mac.

    of course not.

    Likely not... but there are some things that might not.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com on Fri Apr 14 21:33:04 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    In article <LDm_L.444120$5CY7.18465@fx46.iad>, Snit
    <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software...
    and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like >>>> into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs.


    I do think it is fair to say MORE works with PCs, or at least used to.

    the simple fact is that some stuff doesn't work with a pc, most often
    with linux, which many hardware makers do not support.

    By PC in this context I think the implication is Windows.

    that's actually irrelevant.

    But fair enough...
    if you had not been following.

    knock off the condescending attitude.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Apr 15 07:42:35 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 6:33:04 PM MST, "nospam" wrote <140420232133049377%nospam@nospam.invalid>:

    In article <LDm_L.444120$5CY7.18465@fx46.iad>, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software...
    and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like >>>>>> into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs.


    I do think it is fair to say MORE works with PCs, or at least used to.

    the simple fact is that some stuff doesn't work with a pc, most often
    with linux, which many hardware makers do not support.

    By PC in this context I think the implication is Windows.

    that's actually irrelevant.

    When the focus is Windows, Linux is not relevant.


    But fair enough...
    if you had not been following.

    knock off the condescending attitude.

    Curious what it is like to go through life seeking to be offended. Just not my style. But let me try again in a way that might fit your needs:

    Ah, surely you have been following Commander Kinsey's comments and
    computer usage quite closely, and thus your reference to Linux is
    completely and utterly off topic in regards to his usage. How dare
    you, heathen!

    LOL!

    Is that better for you?

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Apr 15 10:16:17 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On 15.04.23 00:26, nospam wrote:
    In article <op.13esq0sxmvhs6z@ryzen.home>, Commander Kinsey
    <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I like into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs.

    Why are you feeding this eternal Troll?

    /X-Posting intentionally left unchanged/.

    --
    Sent with *Betterbird* from a Linux-System running on a MacBook Pro.
    Simply better. https://www.betterbird.eu

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com on Sat Apr 15 07:39:43 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    In article <Lzs_L.1543888$8_id.992402@fx09.iad>, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:


    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I >>>>>> like
    into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs. >>>>

    I do think it is fair to say MORE works with PCs, or at least used to. >>>
    the simple fact is that some stuff doesn't work with a pc, most often
    with linux, which many hardware makers do not support.

    By PC in this context I think the implication is Windows.

    that's actually irrelevant.

    When the focus is Windows, Linux is not relevant.

    there is no focus on windows, especially when comparing to a mac.

    he said 'any piece of hardware' would work. that is false.

    But fair enough...
    if you had not been following.

    knock off the condescending attitude.

    Curious what it is like to go through life seeking to be offended.

    projection

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Sat Apr 15 15:02:44 2023
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:17:29 +0100, J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote:

    Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:56:30 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13epogn4mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for
    the fact that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own
    chips, few thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips
    were introduced and they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though
    every other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and >> in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.


    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer
    has an Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair
    power supply, crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC
    users get to choose what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's
    opinion of what they should have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer?

    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things
    all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly >> knows that.

    https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-ceo-we-hope-to-win-back-apple-as-a-chip-custo
    mer-one-day

    Does not mean they are ahead in all areas -- the M-series does have
    weaknesses.



    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving
    forwards.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    All the chip companies want to have the latest and greatest to sell their >> > chips. So of course they all do research.

    And even with that Apple has pulled ahead. We shall see how long that lasts.

    Not really. It is Dutch/German technology by ASML/Zeiss
    that makes it possible.
    (and they have an absolute monopoly on it
    that isnt likely to be broken soon)

    Apple doesn't actually make the chips,
    Samsung and TSMC do that for them, using ASML machinery.
    Apple only designs the chips.

    And ASML will sell their lithography machines to others,
    like for example to Intel. (but not to China)
    So others will catch up,

    Apple is a religion, you can't use logic with these people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Apr 15 16:10:31 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 15, 2023 at 4:39:43 AM MST, "nospam" wrote <150420230739432025%nospam@nospam.invalid>:

    In article <Lzs_L.1543888$8_id.992402@fx09.iad>, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:


    Making our choice more limited. I can plug any piece of hardware I >>>>>>>> like
    into
    this machine, and it'll just work.

    no you can't. not everything will work, and it's the same with macs. >>>>>>

    I do think it is fair to say MORE works with PCs, or at least used to. >>>>>
    the simple fact is that some stuff doesn't work with a pc, most often >>>>> with linux, which many hardware makers do not support.

    By PC in this context I think the implication is Windows.

    that's actually irrelevant.

    When the focus is Windows, Linux is not relevant.

    there is no focus on windows,

    That is what he uses. That is the context. Sorry you missed it, but it is understandable why you did.

    Not sure why you want to argue about it, or why you seek to take offense.


    especially when comparing to a mac.

    he said 'any piece of hardware' would work. that is false.

    But fair enough...
    if you had not been following.

    knock off the condescending attitude.

    Curious what it is like to go through life seeking to be offended.

    projection

    See above where you took offense over nothing.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Snit on Fri Apr 28 04:53:44 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:13:24 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 2:02:50 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13esq0sxmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 21:05:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote: >>
    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:56:30 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13epogn4mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dpsqahmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dfs61imvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact
    that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few
    thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and
    they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every
    other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Yes, it's in their best interests.

    So which one does?

    All of them, which is why Apple hasn't skyrocketed to computers 100 times more powerful than everyone else. They get slightly better, then another gets slightly better, and so on.

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited.

    Nothing they offer limits you choice. You, in fact, choose to not use them. They have no control over that. Apple offers choices you choose to not use.

    Idiot, clearly I meant once you have bought an Apple and gone down that route, you can't just buy any hardware to add.

    I can plug any piece of hardware I like into this machine, and it'll just
    work.

    What hardware do you use which does not work on a Mac?

    Oh go and read some websites about Mac upgrades will you? It's common knowledge. The OS only works with a limited set of hardware.

    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer has an
    Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply,
    crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC users get to choose >>>> what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should
    have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    No, only cons. Freedom of choice is the ultimate requirement in anything. >>
    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer? >>>>
    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things
    all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly
    knows that.

    And tomorrow it will be pretty well accepted Apple is behind.

    Pick a date. I mean it will happen at some time -- but the M3 is likely coming
    out soon. Apple is quite a bit ahead for now. What other PC maker left the others in the dust like this for more than year?

    All of them. Go and look back in history.

    Notice I didn't add the pointless word "that". Why do people insert it?

    You are questioning why that-clauses exist? Or just why it is used in that example?

    Everywhere.
    "I see that it's raining" has precisely the same meaning as "I see it's raining".

    Sometimes it's even used twice!
    "I see that that was the right choice to make" has precisely the same meaning as "I see that was the right choice to make.

    https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-ceo-we-hope-to-win-back-apple-as-a-chip-customer-one-day

    Does not mean they are ahead in all areas -- the M-series does have
    weaknesses.

    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving >>>>>> forwards.

    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    Often doesn't matter. What matters is how good the products are. And on
    average it's pretty much the same.

    Each has pros and cons... but for my use Apple is *generally* ahead. Their UI advantage is, I think, eroding... and that bothers me.

    All interfaces are going backwards. They're breaking simple things, they're removing useful things.

    The second one indicates perhaps they believe we're all thick and it has to get simple enough for a 6 year old to use, but the first one can only mean thicko useless inadequately mentally fitted programmers.

    An example: In the few most recent versions of Windows, the search function simply doesn't work. Quite often you search for "Jim" in a folder of receipts, and I can easily see there are five files right in front of me with Jim in the filename, yet it
    says "no results found". Millions of people complaining on forums, no solution found. Yet in DOS.... "dir Jim*.*" finds them all 100% of the time. Why is this? How can they break such a simple function, then fail to repair it in the next several
    years!?

    I do like their
    automation options, their relative good use of consistency, and how they let me focus on the task and not the tool better than Windows does (though I am also outdated on Windows, so maybe Windows 10/11 has improved).

    That's just your mindset. I hate that sort of focus. I don't want anything taken away from me. For example I never ever use synch systems. I save my file where I know it is. I don't want to trust it probably got duplicated to some other place I'm
    not sure of and will probably appear in a similar place on another machine. If I wanted it there I'd put it there. It's like employing a servant in your house who makes their own decisions, so you can never find anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 28 04:52:48 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.usage.english

    On Apr 27, 2023 at 8:53:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.133efu05mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:
    ...

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every
    other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Yes, it's in their best interests.

    So which one does?

    All of them, which is why Apple hasn't skyrocketed to computers 100 times more
    powerful than everyone else. They get slightly better, then another gets slightly better, and so on.

    There is a reason Apple tends to have very high rates of returning customers and in the price range they sell in they have a high market share. But sure, they might be ahead in many areas (and behind in others, to be sure) but it is not like they are 20 years ahead of the competition in, say, chip design.


    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited.

    Nothing they offer limits you choice. You, in fact, choose to not use them. >> They have no control over that. Apple offers choices you choose to not use.

    Idiot, clearly I meant once you have bought an Apple and gone down that route,
    you can't just buy any hardware to add.

    There are trade off. But what hardware that you use are you thinking of? What hardware would not work on my Mac? There is some... often tied to specific industries, but it is a lot less common than it once was.

    I can plug any piece of hardware I like into this machine, and it'll just >>> work.

    What hardware do you use which does not work on a Mac?

    Oh go and read some websites about Mac upgrades will you? It's common knowledge. The OS only works with a limited set of hardware.

    Ah, I was thinking peripherals and the like. Yeah, with modern Macs you cannot even add additional memory. I get some of the reasons why -- it is all on one chip -- but it is an annoying limit. Would be good if they had a way to add additional memory even if on using it things slowed down a bit.

    But with external hardware, were you thinking of anything specific?


    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer has an
    Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply,
    crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC users get to choose
    what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should
    have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    No, only cons. Freedom of choice is the ultimate requirement in anything. >>>
    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer? >>>>>
    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things
    all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly
    knows that.

    And tomorrow it will be pretty well accepted Apple is behind.

    Pick a date. I mean it will happen at some time -- but the M3 is likely coming
    out soon. Apple is quite a bit ahead for now. What other PC maker left the >> others in the dust like this for more than year?

    All of them. Go and look back in history.

    I would love examples.


    Notice I didn't add the pointless word "that". Why do people insert it?

    You are questioning why that-clauses exist? Or just why it is used in that >> example?

    Everywhere.
    "I see that it's raining" has precisely the same meaning as "I see it's raining".

    There is a different connotative meaning.


    Sometimes it's even used twice!
    "I see that that was the right choice to make" has precisely the same meaning as "I see that was the right choice to make.

    The language is being used for emphasis.


    https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-ceo-we-hope-to-win-back-apple-as-a-chip-customer-one-day

    Does not mean they are ahead in all areas -- the M-series does have
    weaknesses.

    It's not Apple making something amazing, it's just technology moving >>>>>>> forwards.

    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    Often doesn't matter. What matters is how good the products are. And on
    average it's pretty much the same.

    Each has pros and cons... but for my use Apple is *generally* ahead. Their UI
    advantage is, I think, eroding... and that bothers me.

    All interfaces are going backwards. They're breaking simple things, they're removing useful things.

    And in the case of macOS they make it harder to tell which window is the front-most. That is absurd. And they have taken away the ability to easily go up directories in their web browser, and have made some settings harder to
    see. They want to make it more like the iPhone. On the iPhone there is a
    reason to have things more hidden -- limited space -- but it is stupid on the Mac.


    The second one indicates perhaps they believe we're all thick and it has to get simple enough for a 6 year old to use, but the first one can only mean thicko useless inadequately mentally fitted programmers.

    An example: In the few most recent versions of Windows, the search function simply doesn't work. Quite often you search for "Jim" in a folder of receipts,
    and I can easily see there are five files right in front of me with Jim in the
    filename, yet it says "no results found".

    That is broken!

    Millions of people complaining on forums, no solution found. Yet in DOS.... "dir Jim*.*" finds them all 100% of the time. Why is this? How can they break such a simple function, then fail to repair it in the next several years!?

    My guess: they are trying to copy Apple's Searchlight feature and getting it wrong (not that Searchlight works flawlessly).


    I do like their
    automation options, their relative good use of consistency, and how they let >> me focus on the task and not the tool better than Windows does (though I am >> also outdated on Windows, so maybe Windows 10/11 has improved).

    That's just your mindset. I hate that sort of focus. I don't want anything taken away from me.

    I said nothing of taking anything away. The idea is if I want to move
    something from one place to another, on macOS the drag and drop works better (though not perfectly). If I want to have a feature added to an app I might be able to add it to the right click (like adding Urban Dictionary searches and the like).

    For example I never ever use synch systems. I save my file where I know it is. I don't want to trust it probably got duplicated to some other place I'm not sure of and will probably appear in a similar place on another machine.

    You have learned to not trust you machine to work for you. That is telling.

    If I wanted it there I'd put it there. It's like employing a servant in your house who makes their own decisions, so you can never find anything.

    I rarely if ever have that issue (though I tend to not throw things out so I get tons of garbage).

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to whisky-dave on Fri Apr 28 11:02:18 2023
    In article <ea0d7301-40e4-4d34-814d-3c5854ec8c73n@googlegroups.com>, whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 28 April 2023 at 04:53:49 UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    Idiot, clearly I meant once you have bought an Apple and gone down that route, you can't just buy any hardware to add.

    Havene't found anything I can't buy to connect to my Apple.
    Almost any product that is USB compatable can be connected.

    along with thunderbolt, pci, hdmi, dvi, displayport, bluetooth, wifi,
    ethernet (including 10g-e), sata, ata, scsi, firewire, serial and more.


    Oh go and read some websites about Mac upgrades will you? It's common knowledge. The OS only works with a limited set of hardware.

    Not that limited .

    in fact, mac os supports hardware that goes back many years.

    meanwhile, windows 11 cuts off a lot of hardware, some of which is
    capable of running it. win10 technically 'runs' on some old hardware
    but is too slow to be of any use.

    In fact PCs are more limited I can format a SD or TF card
    or HD or SSDs for various Mac OS or FAT or EXFAT .
    But the PCs can't format anything that is Mac OS.

    macs can natively run mac, linux *and* windows software, all at the
    same time.

    pcs can only do windows and linux. no mac.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whisky-dave@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Fri Apr 28 07:30:51 2023
    On Friday, 28 April 2023 at 04:53:49 UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:13:24 +0100, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 2:02:50 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.13esq...@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 21:05:56 +0100, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:56:30 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13epo...@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:58:58 +0100, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On Apr 14, 2023 at 12:01:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
    <op.13dps...@ryzen.home>:

    On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:30:44 +0100, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Apr 13, 2023 at 8:25:44 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote >>>>>>> <op.13dfs...@ryzen.home>:

    "In 2020, Apple made an announcement that was no less shocking for the fact
    that many had predicted it would arrive"

    I can't even begin to work out what that's meant to mean!

    While many had predicted Macs might move from Intel to their own chips, few
    thought it would happen any time soon. And then the chips were introduced and
    they were pretty amazing.

    Apple users always make a fuss when Apple does something, even though every
    other manufacturer is doing similar things.

    What other computer maker is using their own chips,

    Why is that of any importance?

    "even though every other manufacturer is doing similar things."

    Do they?

    Yes, it's in their best interests.

    So which one does?
    All of them, which is why Apple hasn't skyrocketed to computers 100 times more powerful than everyone else. They get slightly better, then another gets slightly better, and so on.

    Yep that's how most things work, although some what faster with computers than say cars.
    .

    Apple does a lot of unique things. Handling the hardware and software... and
    in this case a pretty extreme case of hardware.

    Making our choice more limited.

    Nothing they offer limits you choice. You, in fact, choose to not use them.
    They have no control over that. Apple offers choices you choose to not use.
    Idiot, clearly I meant once you have bought an Apple and gone down that route, you can't just buy any hardware to add.

    Havene't found anything I can't buy to connect to my Apple.
    Almost any product that is USB compatable can be connected.

    I can plug any piece of hardware I like into this machine, and it'll just >> work.

    What hardware do you use which does not work on a Mac?
    Oh go and read some websites about Mac upgrades will you? It's common knowledge. The OS only works with a limited set of hardware.

    Not that limited . In fact PCs are more limited I can format a SD or TF card or HD or SSDs for various Mac OS or FAT or EXFAT .
    But the PCs can't format anything that is Mac OS.


    And anyway, most computers are not made by one company. This computer has an
    Intel CPU, and AMD graphics card, an MSI motherboard, a corsair power supply,
    crucial memory, and a western digital NVME. You see PC users get to choose
    what they prefer. Apple users make do with Apple's opinion of what they should
    have.

    There are pros and cons to that. Sure.

    No, only cons. Freedom of choice is the ultimate requirement in anything. >>
    and ones that are in many ways well ahead of what Intel and AMD offer? >>>>
    I've just told you they aren't ahead. They're all coming up with new things
    all the time. Sometimes one leapfrogs the other.

    Right now it is pretty well accepted that Apple is ahead. Even Intel clearly
    knows that.

    And tomorrow it will be pretty well accepted Apple is behind.

    Pick a date. I mean it will happen at some time -- but the M3 is likely coming
    out soon. Apple is quite a bit ahead for now. What other PC maker left the others in the dust like this for more than year?
    All of them. Go and look back in history.

    Most were better than the generic PC of the time.
    PCs have tended to lag behind for cost saving measures.



    The Apple M-series chips are an example of Apple pushing technology forward.

    And tomorrow one of the others will do the same.

    Sure. But what other computer company does it as often as Apple?

    Often doesn't matter. What matters is how good the products are. And on >> average it's pretty much the same.

    Each has pros and cons... but for my use Apple is *generally* ahead. Their UI
    advantage is, I think, eroding... and that bothers me.
    All interfaces are going backwards. They're breaking simple things, they're removing useful things.

    Like what exactly ?


    The second one indicates perhaps they believe we're all thick and it has to get simple enough for a 6 year old to use, but the first one can only mean thicko useless inadequately mentally fitted programmers.

    Users are becoming thicker yes.


    An example: In the few most recent versions of Windows, the search function simply doesn't work. Quite often you search for "Jim" in a folder of receipts, and I can easily see there are five files right in front of me with Jim in the filename, yet it
    says "no results found". Millions of people complaining on forums, no solution found. Yet in DOS.... "dir Jim*.*" finds them all 100% of the time. Why is this? How can they break such a simple function, then fail to repair it in the next several years!?

    That's windows for you.
    I remember it as ls jim*.*

    which I think yuo can still do in Mac OS in terminal mode.



    I do like their
    automation options, their relative good use of consistency, and how they let
    me focus on the task and not the tool better than Windows does (though I am
    also outdated on Windows, so maybe Windows 10/11 has improved).
    That's just your mindset. I hate that sort of focus. I don't want anything taken away from me. For example I never ever use synch systems. I save my file where I know it is.

    So why dod you need to search for jim ?

    I don't want to trust it probably got duplicated to some other place I'm not sure of and will probably appear in a similar place on another machine. If I wanted it there I'd put it there. It's like employing a servant in your house who makes their own
    decisions, so you can never find anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)