• Re: 5K Sutudio Display Alternatives?

    From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 17 11:58:30 2024
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 11:37:51 GMT, "Matt" <matnomail@myemail.invalid>
    wrote:

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    There isn't anything that provides what you want in a single package, so
    you're going to have to get a screen for screen things and a separate
    docking adapter for the ports. No one makes 5k monitors right now except
    Apple, and they update their screens once a decade or so.

    Screenwise I'm extremely happy using a 3:2 ratio 28" Huawei MateView. It
    has a great picture and costs quarter of the 27" Apple screen. It has
    the nice "connect one USBC lead for signal and power" thing. Plus some
    other ports that I don't use.

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    Sent from my Amiga 1000

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 17 11:37:51 2024
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in
    addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me, or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't
    exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Matt on Tue Dec 17 14:24:11 2024
    On 17/12/2024 11:37, Matt wrote:
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me, or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day
    find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    I fully understand your dilemma!

    Might you be tempted by this?

    https://eshop.macsales.com/configure-my-mac/apple-imac-retina-5k-27-inch-mid-2020?sku=UACN2FS7XX11XXA

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Matt on Tue Dec 17 14:43:35 2024
    Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> wrote:
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss that quality of monitor.

    I recently bought a 2015 5K 27" iMac for £112. It's doing fine as a Mac for the time being, but one day I'll turn it into a monitor and connect it to a
    Mac Mini (the M4 Mini is tempting).

    For about £100 you can buy conversion boards on Aliexpress that hook up to
    the 5K panel and take HDMI/DP inputs, and then you can treat it like a
    regular monitor. Pages like this explain the process: https://ohmypizza.com/2023/04/converting-a-5k-imac-into-an-external-5k-display

    (I'm actually a bit surprised that the Chinese folks haven't made a drop in replacement board to fit in the iMac's mounting, back panel etc - it
    wouldn't take much work and would make the process much neater)

    Why do you actually need a *Thunderbolt* display, over a USB-C display?
    Are you bandwidth limited by the USB-C?
    Are you hanging Thunderbolt peripherals (NVMe?) off the display?

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt@21:1/5 to David on Tue Dec 17 16:59:03 2024
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 15:24:11 GMT+1, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:

    On 17/12/2024 11:37, Matt wrote:
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB >> SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to
    avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in
    addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple >> monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a
    Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K
    monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't >> have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new
    Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss >> that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me,
    or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't
    exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day
    find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    I fully understand your dilemma!

    Might you be tempted by this?

    https://eshop.macsales.com/configure-my-mac/apple-imac-retina-5k-27-inch-mid-2020?sku=UACN2FS7XX11XXA


    Thanks David!

    But I am in Europe (Spain).
    And I think I have already found some solution with the Ben Q PD2730S, which I hope in a short time will be available here.

    Regards!
    Matt.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt@21:1/5 to jaimie@usually.sessile.org on Tue Dec 17 16:53:21 2024
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 12:58:30 GMT+1, "Jaimie Vandenbergh" <jaimie@usually.sessile.org> wrote:

    On 17 Dec 2024 at 11:37:51 GMT, "Matt" <matnomail@myemail.invalid>
    wrote:

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    There isn't anything that provides what you want in a single package, so you're going to have to get a screen for screen things and a separate
    docking adapter for the ports. No one makes 5k monitors right now except Apple, and they update their screens once a decade or so.

    Screenwise I'm extremely happy using a 3:2 ratio 28" Huawei MateView. It
    has a great picture and costs quarter of the 27" Apple screen. It has
    the nice "connect one USBC lead for signal and power" thing. Plus some
    other ports that I don't use.

    Cheers - Jaimie


    Thanks Jaimie!

    I will look into the Huawei MateView, but I don't think I can get it here in Europe.

    Someone told me a friend from USA that Ben Q has a new PD2730S.
    But here in Europe it is not available yet:

    https://www.benq.com/en-us/monitor/professional/pd2730s.html

    Cheers.
    Matt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 17 17:14:34 2024
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 15:43:35 GMT+1, "Theo" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> wrote:
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB >> SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to
    avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in
    addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple >> monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a
    Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K
    monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't >> have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new
    Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss >> that quality of monitor.

    I recently bought a 2015 5K 27" iMac for £112. It's doing fine as a Mac for the time being, but one day I'll turn it into a monitor and connect it to a Mac Mini (the M4 Mini is tempting).

    For about £100 you can buy conversion boards on Aliexpress that hook up to the 5K panel and take HDMI/DP inputs, and then you can treat it like a regular monitor. Pages like this explain the process: https://ohmypizza.com/2023/04/converting-a-5k-imac-into-an-external-5k-display

    (I'm actually a bit surprised that the Chinese folks haven't made a drop in replacement board to fit in the iMac's mounting, back panel etc - it
    wouldn't take much work and would make the process much neater)

    Why do you actually need a *Thunderbolt* display, over a USB-C display?
    Are you bandwidth limited by the USB-C?
    Are you hanging Thunderbolt peripherals (NVMe?) off the display?

    Theo

    Interesting, thanks Theo!

    Too bad it's too late for me, as I sold my iMac 27/5K (late 2015) because I
    was tired of the problem that edition suffered, and it caused me some
    problems.

    I sold it for only €600

    Here the problem in question:

    https://eclecticlight.co/2021/02/06/could-this-fix-firmware-updating-in-the-imac-retina-5k-27-inch-late-2015-imac171/


    BTW:

    Pretty much all monitors will work flawlessly on the M4 Mac Mini. If you want crispy text, you'll want a high DPI screen, so 5k at 27" is the best bet,
    USB-C won't work nice beyond 4K.

    Regards,
    Matt.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Matt on Tue Dec 17 20:21:33 2024
    Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> wrote:
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 15:43:35 GMT+1, "Theo" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Interesting, thanks Theo!

    Too bad it's too late for me, as I sold my iMac 27/5K (late 2015) because I was tired of the problem that edition suffered, and it caused me some problems.

    I sold it for only €600

    Here the problem in question:

    https://eclecticlight.co/2021/02/06/could-this-fix-firmware-updating-in-the-imac-retina-5k-27-inch-late-2015-imac171/

    Hmm, AIUI the MBPs which originally came with an Apple AHCI SSD stick (that looks like NVMe but isn't) would refuse to upgrade their firmware if the original Apple SSD wasn't fitted. This was a problem because in the ~2016
    era they didn't properly support NVMe in the firmware - it got better in
    recent versions but to do that you have to reinstall the original Apple SSD. The firmware problem would cause sleep/wake failures because at the time
    Apple wouldn't properly put the NVMe to sleep - the workaround was to turn
    off sleeping, at the expense of battery life.

    On a MBP swapping the original SSD is a case of whipping off the back panel
    and unplugging the SSD so it's not a big deal, but with an iMac that's
    spudger and glue-tape territory.

    I thought they had sorted out NVMe support in recent years (>2018-20) since they have to support external NVMe drives in Thunderbolt enclosures, and so there's not the sleep failures any more. For a time I ran a late 2013 MBP
    with a 2TB NVMe in an adapter and it worked with initially some sleep
    problems. I don't remember if the sleep problem was finally fixed with
    recent MacOS (I used to have lots of sleep/wake failures on the factory hardware, especially with Mavericks); I don't get them any more but I've
    more recently swapped back in the Apple 1TB SSD and deployed the 2TB
    elsewhere.

    BTW:

    Pretty much all monitors will work flawlessly on the M4 Mac Mini. If you want crispy text, you'll want a high DPI screen, so 5k at 27" is the best bet, USB-C won't work nice beyond 4K.

    What's the problem with USB-C beyond 4K, I haven't come across that? One
    thing to bear in mind is that USB-C alt-mode carries Displayport, so you ideally want to connect it to a DP monitor so it's passed through direct
    from the Mac. If you're using HDMI then it has to go through a conversion
    chip and it may be limited by the capabilities of that chip.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Matt on Tue Dec 17 22:23:27 2024
    On 17/12/2024 16:59, Matt wrote:
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 15:24:11 GMT+1, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:

    On 17/12/2024 11:37, Matt wrote:
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB
    SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to
    avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in
    addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple >>> monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a >>> Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K
    monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't
    have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new
    Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss >>> that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me,
    or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't
    exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day
    find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    I fully understand your dilemma!

    Might you be tempted by this?

    https://eshop.macsales.com/configure-my-mac/apple-imac-retina-5k-27-inch-mid-2020?sku=UACN2FS7XX11XXA


    Thanks David!

    But I am in Europe (Spain).

    As far as I'm aware, they will ship to Europe!

    And I think I have already found some solution with the Ben Q PD2730S, which I
    hope in a short time will be available here.

    Good luck with that.

    Regards!
    Matt.

    --
    Kind regards,
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed Dec 18 03:38:50 2024
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 20:21:33 GMT, Theo wrote:

    Pretty much all monitors will work flawlessly on the M4 Mac Mini. If you want
    crispy text, you'll want a high DPI screen, so 5k at 27" is the best bet,
    USB-C won't work nice beyond 4K.


    I'm in (or will be soon) in a similar situation to you. I don't think I could justify an Apple display, not so much on cost - more that I don't think I can appreciate the difference. I've got a cheap 28" Asus VP28U monitor I use on a Windows machine mainly for games. Close up, the 5k 27" iMac I use is obviously streets ahead, but text doesn't look too bad at normal viewing distances.

    What's the problem with USB-C beyond 4K, I haven't come across that? One thing to bear in mind is that USB-C alt-mode carries Displayport, so you ideally want to connect it to a DP monitor so it's passed through direct
    from the Mac. If you're using HDMI then it has to go through a conversion chip and it may be limited by the capabilities of that chip.

    Come the time I'll take a look at:

    https://www.techradar.com/computing/monitors/benq-pd2705ua

    The Benq the OP's holding out for, and the Huawei mentioned by Jamie, also on the shortlist.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan B@21:1/5 to RJH on Wed Dec 18 08:49:24 2024
    On 2024-12-18, RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 20:21:33 GMT, Theo wrote:

    Pretty much all monitors will work flawlessly on the M4 Mac Mini. If you want
    crispy text, you'll want a high DPI screen, so 5k at 27" is the best bet, >>> USB-C won't work nice beyond 4K.


    I'm in (or will be soon) in a similar situation to you. I don't think I could justify an Apple display, not so much on cost - more that I don't think I can appreciate the difference. I've got a cheap 28" Asus VP28U monitor I use on a Windows machine mainly for games. Close up, the 5k 27" iMac I use is obviously
    streets ahead, but text doesn't look too bad at normal viewing distances.

    The Apple's lack of HDR might put gamers off too? (Not that I'm a gamer!)

    --
    Cheers, Alan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to RJH on Wed Dec 18 08:17:47 2024
    On 18/12/2024 03:38, RJH wrote:
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 20:21:33 GMT, Theo wrote:

    Pretty much all monitors will work flawlessly on the M4 Mac Mini. If you want
    crispy text, you'll want a high DPI screen, so 5k at 27" is the best bet, >>> USB-C won't work nice beyond 4K.


    I'm in (or will be soon) in a similar situation to you. I don't think I could justify an Apple display, not so much on cost - more that I don't think I can appreciate the difference. I've got a cheap 28" Asus VP28U monitor I use on a Windows machine mainly for games. Close up, the 5k 27" iMac I use is obviously
    streets ahead, but text doesn't look too bad at normal viewing distances.

    What's the problem with USB-C beyond 4K, I haven't come across that? One
    thing to bear in mind is that USB-C alt-mode carries Displayport, so you
    ideally want to connect it to a DP monitor so it's passed through direct
    from the Mac. If you're using HDMI then it has to go through a conversion >> chip and it may be limited by the capabilities of that chip.

    Come the time I'll take a look at:

    https://www.techradar.com/computing/monitors/benq-pd2705ua

    The Benq the OP's holding out for, and the Huawei mentioned by Jamie, also on the shortlist.

    Was Jamie mistaken (see above) when he said "No one makes 5k monitors
    right now except Apple"?

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 19 12:08:21 2024
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 21:21:33 GMT+1, "Theo" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> wrote:
    On 17 Dec 2024 at 15:43:35 GMT+1, "Theo" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> >> wrote:

    Interesting, thanks Theo!

    Too bad it's too late for me, as I sold my iMac 27/5K (late 2015) because I >> was tired of the problem that edition suffered, and it caused me some
    problems.

    I sold it for only €600

    Here the problem in question:

    https://eclecticlight.co/2021/02/06/could-this-fix-firmware-updating-in-the-imac-retina-5k-27-inch-late-2015-imac171/


    BTW:

    Pretty much all monitors will work flawlessly on the M4 Mac Mini. If you want
    crispy text, you'll want a high DPI screen, so 5k at 27" is the best bet,
    USB-C won't work nice beyond 4K.

    What's the problem with USB-C beyond 4K, I haven't come across that? One thing to bear in mind is that USB-C alt-mode carries Displayport, so you ideally want to connect it to a DP monitor so it's passed through direct
    from the Mac. If you're using HDMI then it has to go through a conversion chip and it may be limited by the capabilities of that chip.

    Theo


    The main difference between USB C and Thunderbolt is their transfer rate and bandwidth. Thunderbolt has a much higher transfer rate, up to 40 Gbps compared to the USB C's 20 Gbps. This makes it ideal for tasks such as transferring large files or streaming high resolution videos.

    Not a big problem, depending on how and what they are used for. But what interests me most is to keep equipment that is obsolete or outdated in one way or another for as long as possible.

    For example: I made a mistake when I bought the MacBook-Pro that I now use,
    and I put it up for sale because for not having waited, or to find out better, I am all the time dependent on USB to USBC adapters to connect my hard drives, and others, and worse, I have to use connectors and converter cables from
    USB-C to HDMI to watch films on my TV... which, incidentally, none of them
    work properly with my home cinema system, which uses Dolby Atmos, among other things...

    Matt.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)