• Re: iCloud or their cloud?

    From TimS@21:1/5 to Frederick on Mon Feb 17 18:41:51 2025
    On 17 Feb 2025 at 18:39:10 GMT, "Frederick" <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access, is
    now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I can't cease something I haven't started. However, the same applies to DropBox, which I am making use of.
    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frederick@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 17 18:39:10 2025
    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access, is
    now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Frederick on Mon Feb 17 21:30:33 2025
    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access, is
    now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Tue Feb 18 11:46:36 2025
    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:30:33 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access, is
    now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable >government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.

    I don't know how far this has gone nor how real the reports are but I
    have read that Melon Mush has armies of little children busily
    invading official buildings, raiding their files and stealing vast
    wadges of personal information such as health, employment, financial
    and tax records.

    If Smelly Mush can be allowed to do this inside restricted,
    confidential, official file systems there is probably not going to be
    much opposition when he does it to personal information stored by
    commercial companies such as Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Imgur, YouTube,
    Banks, Finance Houses, Estate Agencies, Hospitals and Insurance
    Companies.

    Why Melted Tush would *care* about your Pinterest profile is a
    mystery but it seems like he does. Or his Russian and Saudi friends
    do. Or something.

    For my part, I've never trusted "social media". I always thought that
    they would eventually bundle up all that data for sale to Psychology Departments of Universities or advertisers or cops profiling us. Maybe
    all three.

    Letting Melon Must loose on the USofA's once-protected and
    once-confidential files is not nice but it's not entirely unexpected.

    A TV program called "Guardians" showed what this sort of behaviour
    could lead to. "Death By Brown Envelope" was an interesting episode.

    That was not, by far, the only hint we've had over the decades.

    Notice, I don't mention Mr. Blair's little story.

    J.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frederick@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Fri Feb 21 18:17:36 2025
    In message <1r7x4ux.ci3spb1ibii6lN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access,
    is now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.

    Here we go...

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy H@21:1/5 to Frederick on Sat Feb 22 07:27:52 2025
    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:
    In message <1r7x4ux.ci3spb1ibii6lN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access,
    is now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable
    government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.

    Here we go...

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo

    So it’s happened then!

    Now what?

    Well, it’s not actually a feature I had utilised, yet! However, I feel this is just the start of a journey down a deep and complex rabbit hole.

    OK, so so the knee jerk reaction is to ditch iCloud and move to another
    cloud service. But surely that’s not going to fix anything. This ruling
    will apply to any cloud service that offers end to end encryption. Wouldn’t it? If not, then it just proves that our government has a vendetta against Apple as a company. I certainly don’t think trusting in Google or M$ is
    much of a solution either (perhaps the only alternatives that might be able
    to replace the services I currently need).

    I don’t know what the answer is, I have nothing to hide, but I also value
    my privacy and security as an individual. I don’t post photos, or much
    else, on social media platforms anymore - some specialist forums I do use
    from time to time, but my FB usage is very rare, and limited to the
    occasional ‘like’ or comment - I have no other social media accounts.

    I prefer to be selective about what I share with the world, because I am a private person. I also have a distrust in the abilities and intentions of
    those in power, and big corporations whose main agenda is to keep their
    coffers full, and share holders happy.

    Of course I appreciate Apple are one of those, but I have to go with
    something, and for my money, and the services I do want to use, I think
    Apple offer the lesser of all the evils out there (based on 30 years as a customer).

    I just find it amazing that our thick government have succeeded in removing
    a key reason why people choose a company such as Apple. As far as I’m concerned, this is bullshit, and they obviously have no idea about the
    real world.

    Perhaps I’ll just roll back a few years, and get an Atari ST again, and a Nokia 3310 (I actually still have a Nokia 1100 in a drawer somewhere) ;-).

    --
    Andy H

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to Andy H on Sat Feb 22 08:03:25 2025
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 07:27:52 GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    I just find it amazing that our thick government have succeeded in removing
    a key reason why people choose a company such as Apple. As far as I’m concerned, this is bullshit, and they obviously have no idea about the
    real world.

    Some of us did try to warn about that ahead of time, but it seems not enough people took any notice.

    --
    We knew this Labour Government would be inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept, this soon.

    James Cleverly, 10th Feb 2025

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to TimS on Sat Feb 22 08:44:03 2025
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:03:25 GMT, TimS wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 07:27:52 GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    I just find it amazing that our thick government have succeeded in removing >> a key reason why people choose a company such as Apple. As far as I’m
    concerned, this is bullshit, and they obviously have no idea about the
    real world.


    Having listened to various radio reports, nobody's answered the question: why didn't Apple refuse to capitulate? In much the same way as they refused FBI access a few years ago.

    Some of us did try to warn about that ahead of time, but it seems not enough people took any notice.

    It seems most people don't know or care - according to some expert on R4.

    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to RJH on Sat Feb 22 09:36:59 2025
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:44:03 GMT, "RJH" <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:

    Having listened to various radio reports, nobody's answered the question: why didn't Apple refuse to capitulate?

    Mostly as Chris said. Plus I'm not really keen on tech companies
    whimsically disobeying national laws (even though in this case the law
    is absolutely fucking stupid).

    In much the same way as they refused FBI
    access a few years ago.

    Completely different situation tech-wise and legally.

    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    Yes.

    Also the point that almost no-one *used* ADP since it's not a default is illuminating... if you didn't have it enabled already, why freak out
    that it's no longer allowed?

    I do roll my eyes when "Apple is legally required to disable optional
    feature that few use" gets so many headlines and handwringing, when
    "Google is already actively violating privacy laws and sells all your
    usage data" doesn't. https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/googles-new-policy-tracks-all-your-devices-with-no-opt-out/

    Cheers - Jaimie

    --
    If you mean 'am I serious about what I do', the answer is yes.
    If you mean 'am I serious about how I do it', the answer is no.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan B@21:1/5 to RJH on Sat Feb 22 10:02:07 2025
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:44:03 GMT, "RJH" <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:03:25 GMT, TimS wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 07:27:52 GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    I just find it amazing that our thick government have succeeded in removing >>> a key reason why people choose a company such as Apple. As far as I’m
    concerned, this is bullshit, and they obviously have no idea about the
    real world.


    Having listened to various radio reports, nobody's answered the question: why didn't Apple refuse to capitulate? In much the same way as they refused FBI access a few years ago.

    Some of us did try to warn about that ahead of time, but it seems not enough >> people took any notice.

    It seems most people don't know or care - according to some expert on R4.

    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    I don't use ADP nor do the majority of Apple users. Will writing to one's MP actually make any difference? With a 400+ majority I can't see the government backing down.

    --
    Cheers, Alan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graeme Wall@21:1/5 to Alan B on Sat Feb 22 10:28:32 2025
    On 22/02/2025 10:02, Alan B wrote:
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:44:03 GMT, "RJH" <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:03:25 GMT, TimS wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 07:27:52 GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote: >>>
    I just find it amazing that our thick government have succeeded in removing
    a key reason why people choose a company such as Apple. As far as I’m >>>> concerned, this is bullshit, and they obviously have no idea about the >>>> real world.


    Having listened to various radio reports, nobody's answered the question: why
    didn't Apple refuse to capitulate? In much the same way as they refused FBI >> access a few years ago.

    Some of us did try to warn about that ahead of time, but it seems not enough
    people took any notice.

    It seems most people don't know or care - according to some expert on R4.

    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    I don't use ADP nor do the majority of Apple users. Will writing to one's MP actually make any difference? With a 400+ majority I can't see the government backing down.


    They are in thrall to the "everyone who uses encryption is a paedophile" pressure groups.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan B@21:1/5 to John on Sat Feb 22 13:52:20 2025
    John <Man@the.keyboard> wrote:

    [mighty snippage]

    Notice, I don't mention Mr. Blair's little story.

    But what about Komrade Krosnov’s story.

    <https://bylinetimes.com/2025/02/21/donald-trump-was-recruited-by-the-kgb-under-codename-krasnov-claims-former-soviet-spy-chief/>

    Sorry I just couldn’t resist ;-)

    --
    Cheers, Alan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy H@21:1/5 to Alan B on Sat Feb 22 15:43:12 2025
    Alan B <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:44:03 GMT, "RJH" <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:03:25 GMT, TimS wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 07:27:52 GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote: >>>
    I just find it amazing that our thick government have succeeded in removing
    a key reason why people choose a company such as Apple. As far as I’m >>>> concerned, this is bullshit, and they obviously have no idea about the >>>> real world.


    Having listened to various radio reports, nobody's answered the question: why
    didn't Apple refuse to capitulate? In much the same way as they refused FBI >> access a few years ago.

    Some of us did try to warn about that ahead of time, but it seems not enough
    people took any notice.

    It seems most people don't know or care - according to some expert on R4.

    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    I don't use ADP nor do the majority of Apple users. Will writing to one's MP actually make any difference? With a 400+ majority I can't see the government backing down.

    No, I never intended to use it myself. It’s just where this is going to
    lead that’s concerning.

    I seem to recall reading an article that suggested ADP was mostly intended
    for high risk users, such as journalists (don’t care about those myself!),
    or (ironically) government officials! Nice one guys - consider your foot to
    be shot ;-).

    --
    Andy H

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ridd@21:1/5 to Chris on Sat Feb 22 18:36:29 2025
    On 22/02/2025 09:04, Chris wrote:
    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:03:25 GMT, TimS wrote:
    It seems most people don't know or care - according to some expert on R4.

    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    That does seem to be the only option.

    Certainly try, but I did it last time and got the proverbial finger from
    my (now ex) MP.

    --
    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan B@21:1/5 to Jaimie Vandenbergh on Sat Feb 22 20:51:55 2025
    Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@usually.sessile.org> wrote:
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 18:36:29 GMT, "Chris Ridd" <chrisridd@mac.com> wrote:

    On 22/02/2025 09:04, Chris wrote:
    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:03:25 GMT, TimS wrote:
    It seems most people don't know or care - according to some expert on R4. >>>>
    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    That does seem to be the only option.

    Certainly try, but I did it last time and got the proverbial finger from
    my (now ex) MP.

    My previous MP (from the twat party) I wrote to once to thank him for
    voting against some horrible invasion of privacy bill. He wrote back to
    say "yes, it didn't go far enough".

    He got punted at the last election, thankfully.

    Change of MP and change of party at last election here but just as inept
    sadly. And I voted for the current MP too :(

    --
    Cheers, Alan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to Chris Ridd on Sat Feb 22 20:36:38 2025
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 18:36:29 GMT, "Chris Ridd" <chrisridd@mac.com> wrote:

    On 22/02/2025 09:04, Chris wrote:
    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:03:25 GMT, TimS wrote:
    It seems most people don't know or care - according to some expert on R4. >>>
    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    That does seem to be the only option.

    Certainly try, but I did it last time and got the proverbial finger from
    my (now ex) MP.

    My previous MP (from the twat party) I wrote to once to thank him for
    voting against some horrible invasion of privacy bill. He wrote back to
    say "yes, it didn't go far enough".

    He got punted at the last election, thankfully.

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    To every complex problem there is a solution which
    is simple, neat and wrong.
    -- HL Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Andy H on Sun Feb 23 01:27:07 2025
    On 22/02/2025 07:27, Andy H wrote:
    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:
    In message <1r7x4ux.ci3spb1ibii6lN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access, >>>> is now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable >>> government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.

    Here we go...

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo

    So it’s happened then!

    Now what?

    Well, it’s not actually a feature I had utilised, yet! However, I feel this is just the start of a journey down a deep and complex rabbit hole.

    OK, so so the knee jerk reaction is to ditch iCloud and move to another
    cloud service. But surely that’s not going to fix anything. This ruling will apply to any cloud service that offers end to end encryption. Wouldn’t it? If not, then it just proves that our government has a vendetta against Apple as a company. I certainly don’t think trusting in Google or M$ is much of a solution either (perhaps the only alternatives that might be able to replace the services I currently need).

    I don’t know what the answer is, I have nothing to hide, but I also value my privacy and security as an individual. I don’t post photos, or much else, on social media platforms anymore - some specialist forums I do use from time to time, but my FB usage is very rare, and limited to the occasional ‘like’ or comment - I have no other social media accounts.

    I think for most people, the issue is a non-issue. People for whom it
    *might* be an issue fall into categories such as: investigative
    journalists wishing to conceal sources, whistleblowers and those
    assisting them, and the like. And also criminals.

    Why?

    Because your photos and documents in iCloud will still be encrypted,
    will still be secure against hacking by outsiders and will still be
    secure against casual snooping by Apple employees.

    You will still be able to securely share them with people you select
    just as at present.

    What they won't be - any more - is secure against UK law enforcement
    access ** without your knowledge **.

    The "without your knowledge" is the key practical difference: under
    end-to-end encryption, UK law enforcement have to use a RIPA section 49
    notice to require you to disclose your password. And, obviously, you
    would then know that your data is being accessed.

    Without end to end encryption in place, they can go direct to Apple with
    a court order and force Apple to decrypt your data. This is possible
    because the standard security deployed by Apple uses encryption in
    transit and at rest, but the keys are held by them.

    I prefer to be selective about what I share with the world, because I am a private person. I also have a distrust in the abilities and intentions of those in power, and big corporations whose main agenda is to keep their coffers full, and share holders happy.

    Of course I appreciate Apple are one of those, but I have to go with something, and for my money, and the services I do want to use, I think
    Apple offer the lesser of all the evils out there (based on 30 years as a customer).

    I just find it amazing that our thick government have succeeded in removing
    a key reason why people choose a company such as Apple. As far as I’m concerned, this is bullshit, and they obviously have no idea about the
    real world.

    It does seem a bit excessive by the government. In 2014-5 (a handy year
    I could quickly find stats for) there were just 37 section 49 notices
    served, and only 3 people were convicted for refusing. So (a) the need
    for decryption powers is low and (b) the powers they already have seem
    to be working well.


    Perhaps I’ll just roll back a few years, and get an Atari ST again, and a Nokia 3310 (I actually still have a Nokia 1100 in a drawer somewhere) ;-).



    --
    Bruce Horrocks
    Hampshire, England

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Jaimie Vandenbergh on Sun Feb 23 06:23:29 2025
    On 22 Feb 2025 at 09:36:59 GMT, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:

    On 22 Feb 2025 at 08:44:03 GMT, "RJH" <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:

    Having listened to various radio reports, nobody's answered the question: why
    didn't Apple refuse to capitulate?

    Mostly as Chris said. Plus I'm not really keen on tech companies
    whimsically disobeying national laws (even though in this case the law
    is absolutely fucking stupid).


    Well, that's the point - stupid law. And the lack of discussion/presentation
    of any evidence. Does weaking privacy lead to a safer society? It may - but let's talk about it.

    In much the same way as they refused FBI
    access a few years ago.

    Completely different situation tech-wise and legally.


    Oh OK - I meant what looks like caving in to government, rather than any technical or legal similarity.

    For myself, I'm not sure how to challenge the decision. Stiff letter to my MP?

    Yes.

    Also the point that almost no-one *used* ADP since it's not a default is illuminating... if you didn't have it enabled already, why freak out
    that it's no longer allowed?


    Yes, thanks - TBH, hadn't realised that - it is (of course) 'off' on my system :-)

    I do roll my eyes when "Apple is legally required to disable optional
    feature that few use" gets so many headlines and handwringing, when
    "Google is already actively violating privacy laws and sells all your
    usage data" doesn't. https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/googles-new-policy-tracks-all-your-devices-with-no-opt-out/

    Yes OK, doesn't make it right.

    And I also don't buy the 'I've nothing to hide' argument presented elsewhere
    in this thread. Plenty of miscarriages of justice where authorities make the innocent appear guilty (Bham 6 etc.). An AI scan of my data could easily set
    me up as a suspect for any of a number of crimes. Just compile means/motive/opportunity. All I have to do is piss off those authorities . . .

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graeme Wall@21:1/5 to David Kennedy on Sun Feb 23 12:38:43 2025
    On 23/02/2025 11:29, David Kennedy wrote:
    On 22/02/2025 08:03, TimS wrote:
    We knew this Labour Government would be inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept, this soon.

    James Cleverly,  10th Feb 2025

    I'm always impressed when anyone can find something good to say about
    James [not very] Cleverly

    Somebody must have wrote that for him.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan B@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 23 12:48:47 2025
    On 23 Feb 2025 at 12:38:43 GMT, "Graeme Wall" <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:

    On 23/02/2025 11:29, David Kennedy wrote:
    On 22/02/2025 08:03, TimS wrote:
    We knew this Labour Government would be inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept, this soon.

    James Cleverly, 10th Feb 2025

    I'm always impressed when anyone can find something good to say about
    James [not very] Cleverly

    Somebody must have wrote that for him.

    He's an unclever dick ;)

    --
    Cheers, Alan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 23 13:57:39 2025
    On 23 Feb 2025 at 12:38:43 GMT, "Graeme Wall" <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:

    On 23/02/2025 11:29, David Kennedy wrote:
    On 22/02/2025 08:03, TimS wrote:
    We knew this Labour Government would be inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept ...
    We didn't expect them to be this inept, this soon.

    James Cleverly, 10th Feb 2025

    I'm always impressed when anyone can find something good to say about
    James [not very] Cleverly

    Somebody must have wrote that for him.

    Whether someone did, or not - what he said remains perfectly true. I'm surprised any of them can still walk, the number of bullets they've put
    through their feet.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Frederick on Tue Feb 25 14:21:47 2025
    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    In message <1r7x4ux.ci3spb1ibii6lN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access,
    is now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.

    Here we go...

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo

    Could you turn it on, when abroad?
    (and be like those who already have it?)
    That is, until Apple finds a way to turn those off too,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Tue Feb 25 17:48:24 2025
    On 17.02.25 22:30, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access, is
    now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.

    I couldn't agree more.


    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Andy H on Tue Feb 25 17:56:58 2025
    On 22.02.25 08:27, Andy H wrote:
    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:
    In message <1r7x4ux.ci3spb1ibii6lN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Frederick <fred@ypical.demon.invalid> wrote:

    Given current USA politics and the UK government's demands for access, >>>> is now a good time to remove one's data and cease the use of iCloud?

    I know of other groups, who would have nothing to hide from a reasonable >>> government, who are now recommending that their members stop using
    certain American media sites.

    Here we go...

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo

    So it’s happened then!

    Now what?

    Well, it’s not actually a feature I had utilised, yet! However, I feel this is just the start of a journey down a deep and complex rabbit hole.

    I use it outside of the UK since it exists. Appl's reaction is the only
    way they could go.

    The alarm bells are ringing extremely loud. It sets a precedent for
    other Gestapo-style governments in the anglosaxon world namely NZ and AU.

    OK, so so the knee jerk reaction is to ditch iCloud and move to another
    cloud service. But surely that’s not going to fix anything. This ruling will apply to any cloud service that offers end to end encryption. Wouldn’t it? If not, then it just proves that our government has a vendetta against Apple as a company. I certainly don’t think trusting in Google or M$ is much of a solution either (perhaps the only alternatives that might be able to replace the services I currently need).

    Even in Switzerland I'm preparing for the worst.


    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ridd@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 05:46:39 2025
    On 25/02/2025 16:56, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    I use it outside of the UK since it exists. Appl's reaction is the only
    way they could go.

    The alarm bells are ringing extremely loud. It sets a precedent for
    other Gestapo-style governments in the anglosaxon world namely NZ and AU.

    It also only takes *one* of the Five Eyes countries to get Apple to
    implement this, and then all the 4 just make an internal request to get
    the data for their Person Of Interest.

    I wonder which other services have received the same order. It won't
    just be Apple, though maybe they got the honour of being first, it'll realistically be Google, Samsung (assuming they differ from Android),
    maybe MS, and obviously the Signal/Telegram/Whatsapp mobs.

    --
    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Chris Ridd on Wed Mar 5 08:14:00 2025
    On 05.03.25 06:46, Chris Ridd wrote:
    On 25/02/2025 16:56, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    I use it outside of the UK since it exists. Appl's reaction is the only
    way they could go.

    The alarm bells are ringing extremely loud. It sets a precedent for
    other Gestapo-style governments in the anglosaxon world namely NZ and AU.

    It also only takes *one* of the Five Eyes countries to get Apple to
    implement this, and then all the 4 just make an internal request to get
    the data for their Person Of Interest.

    I wonder which other services have received the same order. It won't
    just be Apple, though maybe they got the honour of being first, it'll realistically be Google, Samsung (assuming they differ from Android),
    maybe MS, and obviously the Signal/Telegram/Whatsapp mobs.

    So far it seems that only Apple is concerned because only Apple is
    offering real E2E-encryption for many but not all services (for
    technical reasons).

    The large messengers seem not affected yet. It would politically
    backfire too much. But that can change quickly or they have already a
    way to read everything.

    The fact that these services are not allowed to communicate any
    interference by a government it is not really clear where the taxpayer
    and voter stands at the moment. This fact alone is KGB- or Gestapo-style.


    --
    "De gustibus non est disputandum."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ridd@21:1/5 to Mark on Wed Mar 5 13:13:16 2025
    On 05/03/2025 10:09, Mark wrote:
    On 5 Mar 2025 at 5:46:39 am GMT, "Chris Ridd" <chrisridd@mac.com> wrote:

    On 25/02/2025 16:56, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    I use it outside of the UK since it exists. Appl's reaction is the only
    way they could go.

    The alarm bells are ringing extremely loud. It sets a precedent for
    other Gestapo-style governments in the anglosaxon world namely NZ and AU. >>
    It also only takes *one* of the Five Eyes countries <snip>

    Soon to be Four Eyes.

    Maybe. I doubt they'd fully burn down what they've cultivated over
    almost 100 years, whatever is said publicly by a big mouthed orange
    convicted criminal.

    --
    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Chris Ridd on Wed Mar 5 13:56:26 2025
    Chris Ridd <chrisridd@mac.com> wrote:

    On 05/03/2025 10:09, Mark wrote:
    On 5 Mar 2025 at 5:46:39 am GMT, "Chris Ridd" <chrisridd@mac.com> wrote:

    On 25/02/2025 16:56, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    I use it outside of the UK since it exists. Appl's reaction is the only >>> way they could go.

    The alarm bells are ringing extremely loud. It sets a precedent for
    other Gestapo-style governments in the anglosaxon world namely NZ and AU. >>
    It also only takes *one* of the Five Eyes countries <snip>

    Soon to be Four Eyes.

    Maybe. I doubt they'd fully burn down what they've cultivated over
    almost 100 years, whatever is said publicly by a big mouthed orange
    convicted criminal.

    ...with the mindset of a petulant toddler. Don't bank on it.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graeme Wall@21:1/5 to Chris Ridd on Wed Mar 5 15:33:51 2025
    On 05/03/2025 13:13, Chris Ridd wrote:
    On 05/03/2025 10:09, Mark wrote:
    On 5 Mar 2025 at 5:46:39 am GMT, "Chris Ridd" <chrisridd@mac.com> wrote:

    On 25/02/2025 16:56, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    I use it outside of the UK since it exists. Appl's reaction is the only >>>> way they could go.

    The alarm bells are ringing extremely loud. It sets a precedent for
    other Gestapo-style governments in the anglosaxon world namely NZ
    and AU.

    It also only takes *one* of the Five Eyes countries <snip>

    Soon to be Four Eyes.

    Maybe. I doubt they'd fully burn down what they've cultivated over
    almost 100 years, whatever is said publicly by a big mouthed orange
    convicted criminal.


    Unfortunately he is quite likely to do just that, after all he can save
    money that way.

    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)