Hello Old John 🙂
Tell me, please, can you read my conversation here?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
Thank you in anticipation of a response.
On 21 Mar 2025 at 08:37:33 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
Hello Old John 🙂
Tell me, please, can you read my conversation here?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
Thank you in anticipation of a response.
Yes, no problem. But I tend to ignore requests to read this and that, especially when it's ten years old.
I've enough to do anyway.
But in this specific case,
"Failed to load shared conversation. Request is not allowed. Please try again later. (403, 92442e86ded8f654-LHR)"
On 22/03/2025 08:09, John Hill wrote:
On 21 Mar 2025 at 08:37:33 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
Hello Old John 🙂
Tell me, please, can you read my conversation here?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
Thank you in anticipation of a response.
Yes, no problem. But I tend to ignore requests to read this and that,
especially when it's ten years old.
I've enough to do anyway.
Thank you for responding, John. It is appreciated. :-)
But in this specific case,
"Failed to load shared conversation. Request is not allowed. Please try again
later. (403, 92442e86ded8f654-LHR)"
How strange. Please will you post a screenshot of what you see?
Thanks, if you will.
The link https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
works just fine here in thee different browsers
On 22 Mar 2025 at 10:31:27 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
On 22/03/2025 08:09, John Hill wrote:
On 21 Mar 2025 at 08:37:33 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
Hello Old John 🙂
Tell me, please, can you read my conversation here?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
Thank you in anticipation of a response.
Yes, no problem. But I tend to ignore requests to read this and that,
especially when it's ten years old.
I've enough to do anyway.
Thank you for responding, John. It is appreciated. :-)
But in this specific case,
"Failed to load shared conversation. Request is not allowed. Please try again
later. (403, 92442e86ded8f654-LHR)"
How strange. Please will you post a screenshot of what you see?
Thanks, if you will.
The link https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
works just fine here in thee different browsers
I can now see the conversation. A glitch somewhere? Perhaps the "Try again later" worked.
On 23/03/2025 07:49, John Hill wrote:
On 22 Mar 2025 at 10:31:27 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
On 22/03/2025 08:09, John Hill wrote:
On 21 Mar 2025 at 08:37:33 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
Hello Old John 🙂
Tell me, please, can you read my conversation here?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
Thank you in anticipation of a response.
Yes, no problem. But I tend to ignore requests to read this and that,
especially when it's ten years old.
I've enough to do anyway.
Thank you for responding, John. It is appreciated. :-)
But in this specific case,
"Failed to load shared conversation. Request is not allowed. Please try again
later. (403, 92442e86ded8f654-LHR)"
How strange. Please will you post a screenshot of what you see?
Thanks, if you will.
The link https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
works just fine here in thee different browsers
I can now see the conversation. A glitch somewhere? Perhaps the "Try again >> later" worked.
Thank you for letting me know, John.
My friend Jon, who lives near Bristol, said this when I sent him the
link in Apple's 'Messages':-
"Here is my observation on this; you have sent me 2 of these CHATGPT conversations. In both instances it said ‘failed to load’ but when I clicked on the bottom panel of the link it opened instantly. Once it’s opened once, it always opens again instantly."
I find it fascinating that one can have a conversation with a machine in
much the same way one can with another human being! Have you tried out ChatGPT yourself? https://chatgpt.com/
On 23 Mar 2025 at 08:05:37 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
On 23/03/2025 07:49, John Hill wrote:
On 22 Mar 2025 at 10:31:27 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
On 22/03/2025 08:09, John Hill wrote:
On 21 Mar 2025 at 08:37:33 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote: >>>>>
Hello Old John 🙂
Tell me, please, can you read my conversation here?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
Thank you in anticipation of a response.
Yes, no problem. But I tend to ignore requests to read this and that, >>>>> especially when it's ten years old.
I've enough to do anyway.
Thank you for responding, John. It is appreciated. :-)
But in this specific case,
"Failed to load shared conversation. Request is not allowed. Please try again
later. (403, 92442e86ded8f654-LHR)"
How strange. Please will you post a screenshot of what you see?
Thanks, if you will.
The link https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e >>>> works just fine here in thee different browsers
I can now see the conversation. A glitch somewhere? Perhaps the "Try again >>> later" worked.
Thank you for letting me know, John.
My friend Jon, who lives near Bristol, said this when I sent him the
link in Apple's 'Messages':-
"Here is my observation on this; you have sent me 2 of these CHATGPT
conversations. In both instances it said ‘failed to load’ but when I
clicked on the bottom panel of the link it opened instantly. Once it’s
opened once, it always opens again instantly."
I find it fascinating that one can have a conversation with a machine in
much the same way one can with another human being! Have you tried out
ChatGPT yourself? https://chatgpt.com/
As long as you remember that it IS a machine…
I use ChatGPT fairly frequently and have asked it questions ranging from hydrodynamics to Latin. Once I asked it to convert kilograms to stones and pounds, and it got it wrong! TWICE, and differently.
My eldest son uses it often; he finds it can write good software. My second son uses it for that too, and also to discuss radio related topics.
And my daughter uses it now and then.
The eldest uses other AI-based chat engines, too.
So as a family we are quite ChatGPT/AI aware.
I am about to discuss a problem in Family History research with it.
On 24/03/2025 08:10, John Hill wrote:
On 23 Mar 2025 at 08:05:37 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
On 23/03/2025 07:49, John Hill wrote:
On 22 Mar 2025 at 10:31:27 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote:
On 22/03/2025 08:09, John Hill wrote:
On 21 Mar 2025 at 08:37:33 GMT, "David" <David.is@home.today> wrote: >>>>>>
Hello Old John 🙂
Tell me, please, can you read my conversation here?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e
Thank you in anticipation of a response.
Yes, no problem. But I tend to ignore requests to read this and that, >>>>>> especially when it's ten years old.
I've enough to do anyway.
Thank you for responding, John. It is appreciated. :-)
But in this specific case,
"Failed to load shared conversation. Request is not allowed. Please try again
later. (403, 92442e86ded8f654-LHR)"
How strange. Please will you post a screenshot of what you see?
Thanks, if you will.
The link https://chatgpt.com/share/67dd21e7-7044-8013-a8b1-e65dda0c2b8e >>>>> works just fine here in thee different browsers
I can now see the conversation. A glitch somewhere? Perhaps the "Try again >>>> later" worked.
Thank you for letting me know, John.
My friend Jon, who lives near Bristol, said this when I sent him the
link in Apple's 'Messages':-
"Here is my observation on this; you have sent me 2 of these CHATGPT
conversations. In both instances it said ‘failed to load’ but when I >>> clicked on the bottom panel of the link it opened instantly. Once it’s >>> opened once, it always opens again instantly."
I find it fascinating that one can have a conversation with a machine in >>> much the same way one can with another human being! Have you tried out
ChatGPT yourself? https://chatgpt.com/
As long as you remember that it IS a machine…
Of course, Old John! 🙂
I use ChatGPT fairly frequently and have asked it questions ranging from
hydrodynamics to Latin. Once I asked it to convert kilograms to stones and >> pounds, and it got it wrong! TWICE, and differently.
I, too, have had cause to tell ChatGPT that it is wrong! It has always reacted in a positive manner and provided alternative answers.
My eldest son uses it often; he finds it can write good software. My second >> son uses it for that too, and also to discuss radio related topics.
My eldest grandson does the same. He's an IT wizard now!
And my daughter uses it now and then.
The eldest uses other AI-based chat engines, too.
So as a family we are quite ChatGPT/AI aware.
That's really good to know. Thank you.
I am about to discuss a problem in Family History research with it.
Good luck with that! My wife has many years of experience with family research.
If you need any help with any aspect of this research, please let me
know and I'll ask if she can help.
I am about to discuss a problem in Family History research with it.
Good luck with that! My wife has many years of experience with family
research.
If you need any help with any aspect of this research, please let me
know and I'll ask if she can help.
Thank you, but I think I can cope, just about. Anne and I each researched our family histories for about fifteen years, until we pretty much ran out of source material.
In this case I had encountered a situation that IIRC I had not encountered before and I wanted to. see if ChatGPT had anything useful to offer. But, basically, it did not.
All wildly off topic!
Old John.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 147:08:47 |
| Calls: | 10,383 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 14,054 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (1,861K bytes) |
| Messages: | 6,417,724 |