• P: David - lets talk about snit

    From Shadow@21:1/5 to Gremlin on Mon Jun 27 22:25:02 2022
    On 27/06/2022 07:04, Gremlin wrote:
    Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:FQ9uK.359949$zgr9.53487@fx13.iad
    Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:53:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

    On Jun 26, 2022 at 7:53:05 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
    <XnsAEC2E8CBB17E0HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

    David Brooks <nomail@afraid.org> news:MqCtK.4603$A665.4051@fx08.ams1
    Sat, 25 Jun 2022 11:36:11 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

    On 25/06/2022 08:14, Gremlin asked:-
    Who says I don't, David?

    If you *DO* have a website, post the URL, Dustin.

    What possible interest would you have in a tiny company based in TN?

    It would be a good idea for you to show, for once, you were not lying.

    Why are you speaking for David?
    I'm sorry, but, you seem to have me confused
    for someone else. Someone who gives a shit if you, of all people, thinks I'm lying or not lying about, uhh, anything. I've wasted more than enough time discounting everything you've written about me of a negative manner, as well as gone well out of my fucking way to prove that not only can I actually code, but that the code I did release, or released descriptions of actually is mine.

    When you aren't completely ignoring it and referring to me as a functionally illiterate fraud (wtf dude?), you're falsely accusing me of bragging. So either way, no matter what, you try to make me out as the bad guy. You spin and twist every fucking thing I write to try and do so.

    I don't find your effort to speak for him to be satisfactory. I wouldn't accept any work from either of you two dumb shits, for any reason. Even if you were the last two people on earth, I still wouldn't turn a single screw for either of you. So again, I ask a perfectly reasonable and valid
    question. What possible legitimate interest could either of you possibly
    have in a tiny company that's not even in his country, or, your state?

    You've both shown hostile intent towards me, David especially so. So, you'll have to forgive me if I don't believe either of you have my, or that of my employees, best interests at heart with your response to my question. In other words, I don't trust either of you.


    Remember, you called me from the number -- and when I called back it
    gave the name of a company that does not exist. There is no sign of a
    business license in your name.

    I actually called you from a voIP system. I provided you the phone number during the course of our conversation. Maintain your revised version of how you obtained it if you prefer. It still doesn't change the truth, or, reality.

    Interestingly enough, I couldn't find a business license in your name for your ehh, home based business. The only one I did find as the daycare you
    ran with your wife. Why is that snit? Was it possibly in someone elses name for whatever reason, or did you not have one?

    Just as your story changed about your degrees, your story about your
    business is unlikely to be true.

    Nope. As anyone who was already present during that conversation can vouch for, or anyone who wants to go back and see for themselves; I didn't change any 'story'; I corrected myself, and I specifically told you as such. Why do you try to change what actually happened in a forum such as this where it keeps a written record of the events as they took place for years? I mean, dude, the archive is going to show that you are lying, just like I accused you of doing, yet again.

    Are you so arrogant that you think nobody can find those conversations or what? Just because this client is under emulation, and I don't presently
    have full usage of my little assistance tools doesn't mean that I can't pull saved posts from it. Most of it function wise does fine under emulation. Aside from some minor cosmetics (which is likely an Xserver problem) it's fine. So, stop trying to revise events, or otherwise lie about what I wrote, or what you wrote, or when each of us wrote it. It just doesn't work, usenet saves the posts, dumbass.

    [snip]

    Providing you an additional target for you and snit to stalk, and
    harras me, will show what I'm really made of how exactly? What do you
    think you'd get from the url that you can't get from the youtube or
    tiktok urls I've shared, David? An address? a good phone number? :)

    You must think i'm as dumb and as gullible as those who continue to
    interact with and support snit here, eh?

    You make a lot of excuses... for a business with no license or website.

    I've made no excuses for anything. I asked David a completely valid
    question. Especially when you consider what he's publically written about me over the years. It's perfectly reasonable for me to ask him what possible interest he would have in my business, considering that I've already told
    him that we won't take any work from him; we don't want his business. What's left to discuss? I don't need usenet to advertise for me. I've already seen what you do with information, and I already know what David would do with
    it; he's shown me using useless information, several times already.

    I also remember him commenting in a rather disappointed manner when
    reviewing the landscaping video; that he couldn't identify the specific location, or, the name of the shop. laugh laugh laugh. Say, snit, how do you explain that landscaping video taken near the shop if I don't have a
    business as I said I did? rofl, what the fuck would I have a shop for otherwise? I don't do landscaping for a living bro, I never have actually. So, why in the fuck would I have spent so much time dressing up that little spread if I don't have some sort of an investment quite close to it?

    You really don't put much thought into your sarcastic and rude replies to
    me. And you damn sure aren't trying to have any sort of good faith conversation with me, either.

    They've got you well and truly pegged, Dustin! Bwahahhahaha! :-D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From %@21:1/5 to Shadow on Mon Jun 27 22:38:14 2022
    On 27/06/2022 22:25, Shadow wrote:
    On 27/06/2022 07:04, Gremlin wrote:
    Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:FQ9uK.359949$zgr9.53487@fx13.iad
    Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:53:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

    On Jun 26, 2022 at 7:53:05 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
    <XnsAEC2E8CBB17E0HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

    David Brooks <nomail@afraid.org> news:MqCtK.4603$A665.4051@fx08.ams1
    Sat, 25 Jun 2022 11:36:11 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

    On 25/06/2022 08:14, Gremlin asked:-
    Who says I don't, David?

    If you *DO* have a website, post the URL, Dustin.

    What possible interest would you have in a tiny company based in TN?

    It would be a good idea for you to show, for once, you were not lying.

    Why are you speaking for David?
    I'm sorry, but, you seem to have me confused
    for someone else. Someone who gives a shit if you, of all people,
    thinks I'm
    lying or not lying about, uhh, anything. I've wasted more than enough
    time
    discounting everything you've written about me of a negative manner,
    as well
    as gone well out of my fucking way to prove that not only can I actually
    code, but that the code I did release, or released descriptions of
    actually
    is mine.

    When you aren't completely ignoring it and referring to me as a
    functionally
    illiterate fraud (wtf dude?), you're falsely accusing me of bragging. So
    either way, no matter what, you try to make me out as the bad guy. You
    spin
    and twist every fucking thing I write to try and do so.

    I don't find your effort to speak for him to be satisfactory. I wouldn't
    accept any work from either of you two dumb shits, for any reason.
    Even if
    you were the last two people on earth, I still wouldn't turn a single
    screw
    for either of you. So again, I ask a perfectly reasonable and valid
    question. What possible legitimate interest could either of you possibly
    have in a tiny company that's not even in his country, or, your state?

    You've both shown hostile intent towards me, David especially so. So,
    you'll
    have to forgive me if I don't believe either of you have my, or that
    of my
    employees, best interests at heart with your response to my question. In
    other words, I don't trust either of you.

    Remember, you called me from the number -- and when I called back it
    gave the name of a company that does not exist. There is no sign of a
    business license in your name.

    I actually called you from a voIP system. I provided you the phone number
    during the course of our conversation. Maintain your revised version
    of how
    you obtained it if you prefer. It still doesn't change the truth, or,
    reality.

    Interestingly enough, I couldn't find a business license in your name for
    your ehh, home based business. The only one I did find as the daycare you
    ran with your wife. Why is that snit? Was it possibly in someone elses
    name
    for whatever reason, or did you not have one?
    Just as your story changed about your degrees, your story about your
    business is unlikely to be true.

    Nope. As anyone who was already present during that conversation can
    vouch
    for, or anyone who wants to go back and see for themselves; I didn't
    change
    any 'story'; I corrected myself, and I specifically told you as such.
    Why do
    you try to change what actually happened in a forum such as this where it
    keeps a written record of the events as they took place for years? I
    mean,
    dude, the archive is going to show that you are lying, just like I
    accused
    you of doing, yet again.

    Are you so arrogant that you think nobody can find those conversations or
    what? Just because this client is under emulation, and I don't presently
    have full usage of my little assistance tools doesn't mean that I
    can't pull
    saved posts from it. Most of it function wise does fine under emulation.
    Aside from some minor cosmetics (which is likely an Xserver problem) it's
    fine. So, stop trying to revise events, or otherwise lie about what I
    wrote,
    or what you wrote, or when each of us wrote it. It just doesn't work,
    usenet
    saves the posts, dumbass.
    [snip]

    Providing you an additional target for you and snit to stalk, and
    harras me, will show what I'm really made of how exactly? What do you
    think you'd get from the url that you can't get from the youtube or
    tiktok urls I've shared, David? An address? a good phone number? :)

    You must think i'm as dumb and as gullible as those who continue to
    interact with and support snit here, eh?

    You make a lot of excuses... for a business with no license or website.

    I've made no excuses for anything. I asked David a completely valid
    question. Especially when you consider what he's publically written
    about me
    over the years. It's perfectly reasonable for me to ask him what possible
    interest he would have in my business, considering that I've already told
    him that we won't take any work from him; we don't want his business.
    What's
    left to discuss? I don't need usenet to advertise for me. I've already
    seen
    what you do with information, and I already know what David would do with
    it; he's shown me using useless information, several times already.

    I also remember him commenting in a rather disappointed manner when
    reviewing the landscaping video; that he couldn't identify the specific
    location, or, the name of the shop. laugh laugh laugh. Say, snit, how
    do you
    explain that landscaping video taken near the shop if I don't have a
    business as I said I did? rofl, what the fuck would I have a shop for
    otherwise? I don't do landscaping for a living bro, I never have
    actually.
    So, why in the fuck would I have spent so much time dressing up that
    little
    spread if I don't have some sort of an investment quite close to it?

    You really don't put much thought into your sarcastic and rude replies to
    me. And you damn sure aren't trying to have any sort of good faith
    conversation with me, either.

    They've got you well and truly pegged, Dustin! Bwahahhahaha! :-D

    Wrong group?

    FU set

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)