https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
On 25/11/2022 22:27, Commander Kinsey wrote:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
Those stats are out of date.
I'm using macOS Ventura 13.0.1 - this doesn't even get a mention!
On 25 Nov 2022 at 22:27:04 GMT, "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
Since it doesn't show Monterey or Ventura, and the site is fucked, we can safely ignore this (I would have done anyway).
You sound like these Yankee fundies who, on finding something a bit interesting in nature, bleat on about how this shows that "Darwin is in trouble".
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
Just because Apple choose to use silly little childish girly names for their versions doesn't make them a different OS.
In article <op.1v7nbeg3mvhs6z@ryzen.home>, Commander Kinsey
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
apple doesn't chase market share, and os stats are not indicative as to
the state of the industry.
currently, apple is valued at about $2.4 trillion, the highest market
cap of any public company, so clearly they're doing something right.
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
Actually it looks pretty good to me:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/united-states-of-america
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/united-states-of-america
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 16:08:08 -0000, Bob Campbell <nunya@none.none> wrote:
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
Actually it looks pretty good to me:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/united-states-of-america
2.42 times as many Windows machines. So not good for Apple.
And interesting you narrowed it down to the USA, where people have more money and less IQ.
You just carry on spending $1000 on what I can get for $100. Your
country is not right in the head.
By the way Russia is a much bigger land mass than you. I hope Putin kills
every last one of you.
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 16:08:08 -0000, Bob Campbell <nunya@none.none> wrote:
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:2.42 times as many Windows machines. So not good for Apple.
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
Doesn't look good for Apple.
Actually it looks pretty good to me:
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/united-states-of-america >>
And dropping. I remember when it was 95% Windows, 4% Mac and 1% Linux.
Not to mention that the entire Windows PC market was down 15% - 20% in the last quarter (depending on whose numbers you believe), while Mac was way
up.
So, VERY good for Apple.
And interesting you narrowed it down to the USA, where people have more money and less IQ.
Wow. That’s some real, first class trolling there. 🙄
You just carry on spending $1000 on what I can get for $100. Your
country is not right in the head.
Even more absurd trolling.
By the way Russia is a much bigger land mass than you. I hope Putin kills >> every last one of you.
What does land mass have to do with anything?
Not to mention that Putin can’t even conquer Ukraine. No one is scared of him.
And dropping. I remember when it was 95% Windows, 4% Mac and 1% Linux. Not to mention that the entire Windows PC market was down 15% - 20% in the last quarter (depending on whose numbers you believe), while Mac was way up.
So, VERY good for Apple.
It's all Americans with more money than sense.
You just carry on spending $1000 on what I can get for $100. Your
country is not right in the head.
Even more absurd trolling.
Again, a statement of fact.
Go compare an Apple with a PC of the same specs.
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
It's all Americans with more money than sense.
Explain it away however you like. Whatever makes you feel better.
The fact is, Apple is doing very well. Why that bothers you is the only real mystery here.
In article <op.1wa2tlt9mvhs6z@ryzen.home>, Commander Kinsey
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
And dropping. I remember when it was 95% Windows, 4% Mac and 1% Linux. >>> Not to mention that the entire Windows PC market was down 15% - 20% in the >>> last quarter (depending on whose numbers you believe), while Mac was way >>> up.
So, VERY good for Apple.
It's all Americans with more money than sense.
apple sells more *outside* america than within.
It's all Americans with more money than sense.
The fact is, Apple is doing very well. Why that bothers you is the only real mystery here.
Because they've made an incompatible piece of equipment,
redesigned for no
good reason, which costs more to buy.
It has caused people to waste time
their entire lives making the two speak to each other.
Hell, they even
screwed up bluetooth, their phones don't use the standard and can't speak to any others!
This is a car made by Apple.
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Because they've made an incompatible piece of equipment, redesigned for
no good reason, which costs more to buy. It has caused people to waste
time their entire lives making the two speak to each other. Hell, they
even screwed up bluetooth, their phones don't use the standard and can't
speak to any others!
What a total load of bullshit.
As with all trolls, you know nothing of what you troll about. You should actually use an iPhone for a while before making up absurd lies about the “incompatible Bluetooth”. I have no trouble connecting to anything.
I have Macs, Windows and the occasional Linux box here. They all talk to each other.
MacOS and iOS are Unix. Unix/Linux runs on everything from mainframes to
PCs to all phones, tablets and watches. Because Unix is portable and modular.
The “incompatible” part is Windows. Which is - as we speak - losing market
share. Because it is neither portable nor modular.
Because they've made an incompatible piece of equipment, redesigned for
no good reason, which costs more to buy. It has caused people to waste
time their entire lives making the two speak to each other. Hell, they
even screwed up bluetooth, their phones don't use the standard and can't speak to any others!
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Because they've made an incompatible piece of equipment, redesigned for
no good reason, which costs more to buy. It has caused people to waste
time their entire lives making the two speak to each other. Hell, they
even screwed up bluetooth, their phones don't use the standard and can't
speak to any others!
What a total load of bullshit.
As with all trolls, you know nothing of what you troll about. You should actually use an iPhone for a while before making up absurd lies about the “incompatible Bluetooth”. I have no trouble connecting to anything.
I have Macs, Windows and the occasional Linux box here. They all talk to each other.
MacOS and iOS are Unix. Unix/Linux runs on everything from mainframes to
PCs to all phones, tablets and watches. Because Unix is portable and modular.
The “incompatible” part is Windows. Which is - as we speak - losing market
share. Because it is neither portable nor modular.
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Because they've made an incompatible piece of equipment, redesigned for
no good reason, which costs more to buy. It has caused people to waste
time their entire lives making the two speak to each other. Hell, they
even screwed up bluetooth, their phones don't use the standard and can't >> speak to any others!
What a total load of bullshit.
As with all trolls, you know nothing of what you troll about. You should actually use an iPhone for a while before making up absurd lies about the łincompatible Bluetooth˛. I have no trouble connecting to anything.
I have Android, my Aunt has Iphone. They DO NOT connect. I googled it, you have to install a special app on both to translate.
This is an undeniable
fact backed up by a simple google search.
I have Macs, Windows and the occasional Linux box here. They all talk to each other.
With difficulty.
The older macs were even worse with that resource fork shit
on every file.
Store mac file on PC, copy it back, can't open it. Doh!
We
had to install special software on the PC servers to let the Macs understand them.
The łincompatible˛ part is Windows. Which is - as we speak - losing market share. Because it is neither portable nor modular.
It's the most common, therefore anyone not compatible with it is their fault, not Windows.
Windows will alway win, because Windows runs on any piece of hardware.
MacOS only runs (apart from when I Hackintosh it) on Apple hardware.
So that's one company versus a hundred. Are Apple going to beat Dell and
every other PC hardware maker in the world? Not a chance.
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Windows will alway win, because Windows runs on any piece of hardware.
MacOS only runs (apart from when I Hackintosh it) on Apple hardware.
Windows already lost. Unix won.
Windows only runs on PCs. Unix runs on
everything from mainframes to watches and everything in between.
Even MS Azure is 70% Linux. Windows is dying. Why do you suppose that Microsoft is desperately trying to prop up Windows by giving it the ability to run Linux and Android apps? They can see where everything is going.
I also see more Macs (Unix again) on desks where I work then ever before.
So that's one company versus a hundred. Are Apple going to beat Dell and
every other PC hardware maker in the world? Not a chance.
Apple is already beating most PC vendors. Apple is now in 3rd place (or
4th depending on whose numbers you believe). Try keeping up so you are not spouting 20 year old “facts”.
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Windows will alway win, because Windows runs on any piece of hardware.
MacOS only runs (apart from when I Hackintosh it) on Apple hardware.
Windows already lost. Unix won.
Windows only runs on PCs. Unix runs on
everything from mainframes to watches and everything in between.
Even MS Azure is 70% Linux. Windows is dying. Why do you suppose that Microsoft is desperately trying to prop up Windows by giving it the ability to run Linux and Android apps? They can see where everything is going.
I also see more Macs (Unix again) on desks where I work then ever before.
An Iphone can't run asteroid searches, an Android can:
Why change the OS so programmers have to redesign?
Stop reinventing the
wheel. Use Windows or Linux on your Apples, don't make a third OS!
In fact
none of the above have managed to get an Iphone to run their programs at all. Apple's shitty OS prevents it.
Maybe an Iphone would burn out if it did
calculations 24/7 on all cores like my Androids do.
Why change the OS so programmers have to redesign? Stop reinventing the wheel.
In article <jun4mjFtg72U1@mid.individual.net>, TimS <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote:
On 29 Nov 2022 at 18:38:36 GMT, ""Commander Kinsey"" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote: >>> Why change the OS so programmers have to redesign? Stop reinventing the >>> wheel.
Quite right. How about you go back in time and tell that to Microsoft in the >> late 80s, so that they just copy macOS as it was then rather than releasing >> joke versions of Windows for the next 10 years.
and then jump ahead and tell google to just copy ios rather than create android.
On 29 Nov 2022 at 18:38:36 GMT, ""Commander Kinsey"" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Why change the OS so programmers have to redesign? Stop reinventing the wheel.
Quite right. How about you go back in time and tell that to Microsoft in the late 80s, so that they just copy macOS as it was then rather than releasing joke versions of Windows for the next 10 years.
On 29 Nov 2022 at 18:38:36 GMT, ""Commander Kinsey"" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Why change the OS so programmers have to redesign? Stop reinventing the wheel.
Quite right. How about you go back in time and tell that to Microsoft in the late 80s, so that they just copy macOS as it was then rather than releasing joke versions of Windows for the next 10 years.
On 29 Nov 2022 at 18:38:36 GMT, ""Commander Kinsey"" <CK1@nospam.com>
wrote:
Why change the OS so programmers have to redesign? Stop reinventing the >>> wheel.
Quite right. How about you go back in time and tell that to Microsoft in >> the
late 80s, so that they just copy macOS as it was then rather than releasing
joke versions of Windows for the next 10 years.
and then jump ahead and tell google to just copy ios rather than create android.
TBF, that was what they *tried* to do.
Poor market share can be a major challenge for businesses https://www.thenewsontime.com/business/, but it's important to remember that it's not the end of the road. While it can be disheartening to see competitors taking a larger piece of the pie,there are steps that businesses can take to improve their market share over time.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 26:57:51 |
Calls: | 10,390 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,064 |
Messages: | 6,417,061 |