Hello John
I'm looking here again:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSnaxD2HSdc
I can no longer see THIS post in 'Comments' which I made 5 years ago:- https://jumpshare.com/v/JmODMbXWhlETWcU1bBZp
Please suggest any incorrect settings I may have made in Safari which
may prevent me from seeing, now, the post I made 5 years ago?
Thanks.
On 3 Dec 2022 at 23:27:34 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote:
Hello John
I'm looking here again:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSnaxD2HSdc
I can no longer see THIS post in 'Comments' which I made 5 years ago:-
https://jumpshare.com/v/JmODMbXWhlETWcU1bBZp
Please suggest any incorrect settings I may have made in Safari which
may prevent me from seeing, now, the post I made 5 years ago?
Thanks.
Hi David.
I have looked on the link you posted and I cannot see the post you are looking
for in Safari, Firefox or Chrome on Monterey or in Safari on iPadOS. I can see
other posts by you (but not the one you mention in the last, this morning).
I can only conclude that it has been deleted (perhaps on account of its size) and that no amount of tinkering with browser settings will resurrect it.
Sorry!
On 3 Dec 2022 at 23:27:34 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote:
Hello John
I'm looking here again:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSnaxD2HSdc
I can no longer see THIS post in 'Comments' which I made 5 years ago:-
https://jumpshare.com/v/JmODMbXWhlETWcU1bBZp
Please suggest any incorrect settings I may have made in Safari which
may prevent me from seeing, now, the post I made 5 years ago?
Thanks.
Hi David.
I have looked on the link you posted and I cannot see the post you are looking
for in Safari, Firefox or Chrome on Monterey or in Safari on iPadOS. I can see
other posts by you (but not the one you mention in the last, this morning).
I can only conclude that it has been deleted (perhaps on account of its size) and that no amount of tinkering with browser settings will resurrect it.
Sorry!
John.
On 04/12/2022 14:24, John Hill wrote:
On 3 Dec 2022 at 23:27:34 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote: >>
Hello John
I'm looking here again:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSnaxD2HSdc
I can no longer see THIS post in 'Comments' which I made 5 years ago:-
https://jumpshare.com/v/JmODMbXWhlETWcU1bBZp
Please suggest any incorrect settings I may have made in Safari which
may prevent me from seeing, now, the post I made 5 years ago?
Thanks.
Hi David.
I have looked on the link you posted and I cannot see the post you are looking
for in Safari, Firefox or Chrome on Monterey or in Safari on iPadOS. I can see
other posts by you (but not the one you mention in the last, this morning). >>
I can only conclude that it has been deleted (perhaps on account of its size)
and that no amount of tinkering with browser settings will resurrect it.
Sorry!
John.
Something rather odd happened this evening, John. <rolls eyes>
I looked at the YouTube video on my old iMac running Linux Mint.
My posts in the comments were shown as being from @BDonTJ
I then signed-in to Google/YouTube ....... and then those same posts
were shown as having been made by David B.
Can you cast any light on how that can have happened? Perhaps it's
simply Google playing around with my mind!
Your thoughts welcomed!
HunterBD <D@vid.invalid> wrote:
On 04/12/2022 14:24, John Hill wrote:
On 3 Dec 2022 at 23:27:34 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote: >>>
Hello John
I'm looking here again:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSnaxD2HSdc
I can no longer see THIS post in 'Comments' which I made 5 years ago:- >>>> https://jumpshare.com/v/JmODMbXWhlETWcU1bBZp
Please suggest any incorrect settings I may have made in Safari which
may prevent me from seeing, now, the post I made 5 years ago?
Thanks.
Hi David.
I have looked on the link you posted and I cannot see the post you are looking
for in Safari, Firefox or Chrome on Monterey or in Safari on iPadOS. I can see
other posts by you (but not the one you mention in the last, this morning). >>>
I can only conclude that it has been deleted (perhaps on account of its size)
and that no amount of tinkering with browser settings will resurrect it. >>>
Sorry!
John.
Something rather odd happened this evening, John. <rolls eyes>
I looked at the YouTube video on my old iMac running Linux Mint.
My posts in the comments were shown as being from @BDonTJ
I then signed-in to Google/YouTube ....... and then those same posts
were shown as having been made by David B.
Can you cast any light on how that can have happened? Perhaps it's
simply Google playing around with my mind!
Your thoughts welcomed!
I saw that, but didn't bother about it.
And anyway, sorry, but I suddenly have more important things to worry
about. Anne had a fall this morning and is on her way to hospital with a suspected broken hip.
So don't expect to hear from me until things are clearer.
John.
HunterBD <D@vid.invalid> wrote:
On 04/12/2022 14:24, John Hill wrote:
On 3 Dec 2022 at 23:27:34 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote: >>>
Hello John
I'm looking here again:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSnaxD2HSdc
I can no longer see THIS post in 'Comments' which I made 5 years ago:- >>>> https://jumpshare.com/v/JmODMbXWhlETWcU1bBZp
Please suggest any incorrect settings I may have made in Safari which
may prevent me from seeing, now, the post I made 5 years ago?
Thanks.
Hi David.
I have looked on the link you posted and I cannot see the post you are looking
for in Safari, Firefox or Chrome on Monterey or in Safari on iPadOS. I can see
other posts by you (but not the one you mention in the last, this morning). >>>
I can only conclude that it has been deleted (perhaps on account of its size)
and that no amount of tinkering with browser settings will resurrect it. >>>
Sorry!
John.
Something rather odd happened this evening, John. <rolls eyes>
I looked at the YouTube video on my old iMac running Linux Mint.
My posts in the comments were shown as being from @BDonTJ
I then signed-in to Google/YouTube ....... and then those same posts
were shown as having been made by David B.
Can you cast any light on how that can have happened? Perhaps it's
simply Google playing around with my mind!
Your thoughts welcomed!
I saw that, but didn't bother about it.
And anyway, sorry, but I suddenly have more important things to worry
about. Anne had a fall this morning and is on her way to hospital with a suspected broken hip.
I'd like to wish you a Happy New Year and hope this year pans out better
than last for you and your loved ones.
If you have a little time on your hands, you may enjoy listening to this talk/chat as much as I did:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY6q5dv_B-o
On 2 Jan 2023 at 09:24:37 GMT, "David Brooks" <David.is@home.now> wrote:
I'd like to wish you a Happy New Year and hope this year pans out better
than last for you and your loved ones.
If you have a little time on your hands, you may enjoy listening to this
talk/chat as much as I did:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY6q5dv_B-o
Thank you for your good wishes. They are very much needed.
But I have no spare time whatsoever. Please appreciate that. I have pinched 5 minutes to skim through 4 days Usenet, this will probably be it until next week.
John.
I am sorry to have to say that my lovely Anne died yesterday in Poole Hospital.
On 4 Jan 2023 at 09:40:08 GMT, "John Hill" <watcombeman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 2 Jan 2023 at 09:24:37 GMT, "David Brooks" <David.is@home.now> wrote:
I'd like to wish you a Happy New Year and hope this year pans out better >>> than last for you and your loved ones.
If you have a little time on your hands, you may enjoy listening to this >>> talk/chat as much as I did:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY6q5dv_B-o
Thank you for your good wishes. They are very much needed.
But I have no spare time whatsoever. Please appreciate that. I have pinched 5
minutes to skim through 4 days Usenet, this will probably be it until next >> week.
John.
I am sorry to have to say that my lovely Anne died yesterday in Poole Hospital.
In the end it was her lungs that gave out and I exect the death certificate to
read pneumonia. But I think she just ran out of steam.
I have no idea what the future holds.
John.
On 4 Jan 2023 at 09:40:08 GMT, "John Hill" <watcombeman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 2 Jan 2023 at 09:24:37 GMT, "David Brooks" <David.is@home.now> wrote:
I'd like to wish you a Happy New Year and hope this year pans out better >>> than last for you and your loved ones.
If you have a little time on your hands, you may enjoy listening to this >>> talk/chat as much as I did:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY6q5dv_B-o
Thank you for your good wishes. They are very much needed.
But I have no spare time whatsoever. Please appreciate that. I have pinched 5
minutes to skim through 4 days Usenet, this will probably be it until next >> week.
John.
I am sorry to have to say that my lovely Anne died yesterday in Poole Hospital.
In the end it was her lungs that gave out and I exect the death certificate to
read pneumonia. But I think she just ran out of steam.
I have no idea what the future holds.
I am sorry to have to say that my lovely Anne died yesterday
in Poole Hospital.
I am sorry to have to say that my lovely Anne died yesterday in Poole Hospital.
I am sorry to have to say that my lovely Anne died yesterday in Poole Hospital.
On 4 Jan 2023 at 09:40:08 GMT, "John Hill" <watcombeman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 2 Jan 2023 at 09:24:37 GMT, "David Brooks" <David.is@home.now> wrote:
I'd like to wish you a Happy New Year and hope this year pans out better >>> than last for you and your loved ones.
If you have a little time on your hands, you may enjoy listening to this >>> talk/chat as much as I did:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY6q5dv_B-o
Thank you for your good wishes. They are very much needed.
But I have no spare time whatsoever. Please appreciate that. I have pinched 5
minutes to skim through 4 days Usenet, this will probably be it until next >> week.
John.
I am sorry to have to say that my lovely Anne died yesterday in Poole Hospital.
In the end it was her lungs that gave out and I exect the death certificate to
read pneumonia. But I think she just ran out of steam.
I have no idea what the future holds.
John.
Hello Old John!
May we have a SITREP please?
TIA
On 7 Dec 2024 at 18:01:03 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Hello Old John!
May we have a SITREP please?
TIA
On the new iMac, I presume?
The learning curve between Ventura and Sonoma is steeper than I expected but slow and steady does it.
The main structure is pretty much the same, but some of the details have been moved, and I'm getting used to that slowly.
TouchID takes a bit of getting used to, but when it works is better than typing in a password. Less reliable than FaceID on my iPhone and iPad.
I'm going to have to label all the keys as I did on the old keyboard. Too faintly marked for my old eyes. And I never learned to touch type.
Otherwise, much snappier performance all round.
Onwards and upwards!
On 09/12/2024 16:42, John Hill wrote:
On 7 Dec 2024 at 18:01:03 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>
Hello Old John!
May we have a SITREP please?
TIA
On the new iMac, I presume?
Yes, sir - of course!
The learning curve between Ventura and Sonoma is steeper than I expected but >> slow and steady does it.
You've stymied me at first base!
You SHOULD be getting used to macOS Sequoia (not Sonoma - that's 'old
hat now!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_Sequoia
Go to System Settings > General > Software Update ..... and *CLICK*!
The main structure is pretty much the same, but some of the details have been
moved, and I'm getting used to that slowly.
There's no hurry! :-)
TouchID takes a bit of getting used to, but when it works is better than
typing in a password. Less reliable than FaceID on my iPhone and iPad.
Noted. Thank you.
I'm going to have to label all the keys as I did on the old keyboard. Too
faintly marked for my old eyes. And I never learned to touch type.
I am REALLY surprised by that! This is what it should be like:- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Keyboard_(Mac)
Please provide a photograph of what /yours/ looks like.
Otherwise, much snappier performance all round.
My friend has an M1 iMac and he has said the same. 🙂
Onwards and upwards!
Of course. If you need any help and/or guidance, please do not hesitate
to ask, Old John.
On 10.12.24 10:18, John Hill wrote:
To me, Ventura sounds
like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with
aerodynamics;
Do you mean a "Vortex Generator"?
;-)
To me, Ventura sounds
like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with aerodynamics;
On 9 Dec 2024 at 20:56:28 GMT, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:
On 09/12/2024 16:42, John Hill wrote:
On 7 Dec 2024 at 18:01:03 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>
Hello Old John!
May we have a SITREP please?
TIA
On the new iMac, I presume?
Yes, sir - of course!
The learning curve between Ventura and Sonoma is steeper than I expected but
slow and steady does it.
You've stymied me at first base!
You SHOULD be getting used to macOS Sequoia (not Sonoma - that's 'old
hat now!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_Sequoia
Go to System Settings > General > Software Update ..... and *CLICK*!
The main structure is pretty much the same, but some of the details have been
moved, and I'm getting used to that slowly.
There's no hurry! :-)
TouchID takes a bit of getting used to, but when it works is better than >>> typing in a password. Less reliable than FaceID on my iPhone and iPad.
Noted. Thank you.
I'm going to have to label all the keys as I did on the old keyboard. Too >>> faintly marked for my old eyes. And I never learned to touch type.
I am REALLY surprised by that! This is what it should be like:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Keyboard_(Mac)
Please provide a photograph of what /yours/ looks like.
Otherwise, much snappier performance all round.
My friend has an M1 iMac and he has said the same. 🙂
Onwards and upwards!
Of course. If you need any help and/or guidance, please do not hesitate
to ask, Old John.
Sonoma was a slip-up. I think it arose partially because I skipped Sonoma entirely, but mainly because of association of words. To me, Ventura sounds like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with aerodynamics; Sonoma brings faint echoes of Brave New World; but Sequoia is definitely a large conifer, not an OS.
I will try not to do that again.
Yes, my keyboard does look exactly like that - that is the trouble. Here is a comparison of my old (re-labelled) keyboard in comparison with the new one. https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ft0t3lf8wf0exi8tj7p4t/IMG_1126.jpeg?rlkey=w482xasbgs7w7hre1i391frsi&st=iger2za9&dl=0
I never hesitate to ask for help if I'm stuck,but prefer to muddle through on my own if I can - I learn much faster that way.
On 10.12.24 11:57, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
On 10.12.24 10:18, John Hill wrote:A vortex generator (VG) is an aerodynamic device, consisting of a small
To me, Ventura sounds
like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with
aerodynamics;
Do you mean a "Vortex Generator"?
;-)
vane usually attached to a lifting surface (or airfoil, such as an
aircraft wing)[1] or a rotor blade of a wind turbine.[2] VGs may also be attached to some part of an aerodynamic vehicle such as an aircraft
fuselage or a car. When the airfoil or the body is in motion relative to
the air, the VG creates a vortex,[1][3] which, by removing some part of
the slow-moving boundary layer in contact with the airfoil surface,
delays local flow separation and aerodynamic stalling, thereby improving
the effectiveness of wings and control surfaces, such as flaps,
elevators, ailerons, and rudders.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_generator
On 10/12/2024 09:18, John Hill wrote:
On 9 Dec 2024 at 20:56:28 GMT, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:
On 09/12/2024 16:42, John Hill wrote:
On 7 Dec 2024 at 18:01:03 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>
Hello Old John!
May we have a SITREP please?
TIA
On the new iMac, I presume?
Yes, sir - of course!
The learning curve between Ventura and Sonoma is steeper than I expected but
slow and steady does it.
You've stymied me at first base!
You SHOULD be getting used to macOS Sequoia (not Sonoma - that's 'old
hat now!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_Sequoia
Go to System Settings > General > Software Update ..... and *CLICK*!
The main structure is pretty much the same, but some of the details have been
moved, and I'm getting used to that slowly.
There's no hurry! :-)
TouchID takes a bit of getting used to, but when it works is better than >>>> typing in a password. Less reliable than FaceID on my iPhone and iPad.
Noted. Thank you.
I'm going to have to label all the keys as I did on the old keyboard. Too >>>> faintly marked for my old eyes. And I never learned to touch type.
I am REALLY surprised by that! This is what it should be like:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Keyboard_(Mac)
Please provide a photograph of what /yours/ looks like.
Otherwise, much snappier performance all round.
My friend has an M1 iMac and he has said the same. 🙂
Onwards and upwards!
Of course. If you need any help and/or guidance, please do not hesitate
to ask, Old John.
Sonoma was a slip-up. I think it arose partially because I skipped Sonoma
entirely, but mainly because of association of words. To me, Ventura sounds >> like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with
aerodynamics; Sonoma brings faint echoes of Brave New World; but Sequoia is >> definitely a large conifer, not an OS.
I will try not to do that again.
No worries! 🙂
There's a Sequoia tree growing not far from me!
Yes, my keyboard does look exactly like that - that is the trouble. Here is a
comparison of my old (re-labelled) keyboard in comparison with the new one. >> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ft0t3lf8wf0exi8tj7p4t/IMG_1126.jpeg?rlkey=w482xasbgs7w7hre1i391frsi&st=iger2za9&dl=0
Thank you! Were you able to purchase a 're-labling' kit - it looks very professional.
I never hesitate to ask for help if I'm stuck,but prefer to muddle through on
my own if I can - I learn much faster that way.
Understood. I endeavour to do likewise!
I never hesitate to ask for help if I'm stuck,but prefer to muddle through on my own if I can - I learn much faster that way.
On 10 Dec 2024 at 11:23:45 GMT, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:
On 10/12/2024 09:18, John Hill wrote:
On 9 Dec 2024 at 20:56:28 GMT, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:
On 09/12/2024 16:42, John Hill wrote:
On 7 Dec 2024 at 18:01:03 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Hello Old John!
May we have a SITREP please?
TIA
On the new iMac, I presume?
Yes, sir - of course!
The learning curve between Ventura and Sonoma is steeper than I expected but
slow and steady does it.
You've stymied me at first base!
You SHOULD be getting used to macOS Sequoia (not Sonoma - that's 'old
hat now!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_Sequoia
Go to System Settings > General > Software Update ..... and *CLICK*!
The main structure is pretty much the same, but some of the details have been
moved, and I'm getting used to that slowly.
There's no hurry! :-)
TouchID takes a bit of getting used to, but when it works is better than >>>>> typing in a password. Less reliable than FaceID on my iPhone and iPad. >>>>Noted. Thank you.
I'm going to have to label all the keys as I did on the old keyboard. Too >>>>> faintly marked for my old eyes. And I never learned to touch type.
I am REALLY surprised by that! This is what it should be like:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Keyboard_(Mac)
Please provide a photograph of what /yours/ looks like.
Otherwise, much snappier performance all round.
My friend has an M1 iMac and he has said the same. 🙂
Onwards and upwards!
Of course. If you need any help and/or guidance, please do not hesitate >>>> to ask, Old John.
Sonoma was a slip-up. I think it arose partially because I skipped Sonoma >>> entirely, but mainly because of association of words. To me, Ventura sounds >>> like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with
aerodynamics; Sonoma brings faint echoes of Brave New World; but Sequoia is >>> definitely a large conifer, not an OS.
I will try not to do that again.
No worries! 🙂
There's a Sequoia tree growing not far from me!
Yes, my keyboard does look exactly like that - that is the trouble. Here is a
comparison of my old (re-labelled) keyboard in comparison with the new one. >>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ft0t3lf8wf0exi8tj7p4t/IMG_1126.jpeg?rlkey=w482xasbgs7w7hre1i391frsi&st=iger2za9&dl=0
Thank you! Were you able to purchase a 're-labling' kit - it looks very
professional.
I never hesitate to ask for help if I'm stuck,but prefer to muddle through on
my own if I can - I learn much faster that way.
Understood. I endeavour to do likewise!
No, it was entirely DIY starting from a scan of the keyboard and using Inkscape. I may use a skightly slimmer font with no serif next time. Some of the symbols were taken from Keyboard Viewer.
Materials - a standard self-adhesive label with a spray of clear matt polyurethane varnish.
On 10/12/2024 12:45, John Hill wrote:
On 10 Dec 2024 at 11:23:45 GMT, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:
On 10/12/2024 09:18, John Hill wrote:
On 9 Dec 2024 at 20:56:28 GMT, "David" <David@example.net> wrote:
On 09/12/2024 16:42, John Hill wrote:
On 7 Dec 2024 at 18:01:03 GMT, "David Brooks" <BDB@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Hello Old John!
May we have a SITREP please?
TIA
On the new iMac, I presume?
Yes, sir - of course!
The learning curve between Ventura and Sonoma is steeper than I expected but
slow and steady does it.
You've stymied me at first base!
You SHOULD be getting used to macOS Sequoia (not Sonoma - that's 'old >>>>> hat now!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_Sequoia
Go to System Settings > General > Software Update ..... and *CLICK*! >>>>>
The main structure is pretty much the same, but some of the details have been
moved, and I'm getting used to that slowly.
There's no hurry! :-)
TouchID takes a bit of getting used to, but when it works is better than >>>>>> typing in a password. Less reliable than FaceID on my iPhone and iPad. >>>>>Noted. Thank you.
I'm going to have to label all the keys as I did on the old keyboard. Too
faintly marked for my old eyes. And I never learned to touch type.
I am REALLY surprised by that! This is what it should be like:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Keyboard_(Mac)
Please provide a photograph of what /yours/ looks like.
Otherwise, much snappier performance all round.
My friend has an M1 iMac and he has said the same. 🙂
Onwards and upwards!
Of course. If you need any help and/or guidance, please do not hesitate >>>>> to ask, Old John.
Sonoma was a slip-up. I think it arose partially because I skipped Sonoma >>>> entirely, but mainly because of association of words. To me, Ventura sounds
like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with
aerodynamics; Sonoma brings faint echoes of Brave New World; but Sequoia is
definitely a large conifer, not an OS.
I will try not to do that again.
No worries! 🙂
There's a Sequoia tree growing not far from me!
Yes, my keyboard does look exactly like that - that is the trouble. Here is a
comparison of my old (re-labelled) keyboard in comparison with the new one.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ft0t3lf8wf0exi8tj7p4t/IMG_1126.jpeg?rlkey=w482xasbgs7w7hre1i391frsi&st=iger2za9&dl=0
Thank you! Were you able to purchase a 're-labling' kit - it looks very
professional.
I never hesitate to ask for help if I'm stuck,but prefer to muddle through on
my own if I can - I learn much faster that way.
Understood. I endeavour to do likewise!
No, it was entirely DIY starting from a scan of the keyboard and using
Inkscape. I may use a skightly slimmer font with no serif next time. Some of >> the symbols were taken from Keyboard Viewer.
Materials - a standard self-adhesive label with a spray of clear matt
polyurethane varnish.
I'm impressed! First-class work, John! :-)
For now, can you use your old magic keyboard with your new iMac?
On 10 Dec 2024 at 10:59:18 GMT, "Jörg Lorenz" <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
On 10.12.24 11:57, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
On 10.12.24 10:18, John Hill wrote:A vortex generator (VG) is an aerodynamic device, consisting of a small
To me, Ventura sounds
like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with
aerodynamics;
Do you mean a "Vortex Generator"?
;-)
vane usually attached to a lifting surface (or airfoil, such as an
aircraft wing)[1] or a rotor blade of a wind turbine.[2] VGs may also be
attached to some part of an aerodynamic vehicle such as an aircraft
fuselage or a car. When the airfoil or the body is in motion relative to
the air, the VG creates a vortex,[1][3] which, by removing some part of
the slow-moving boundary layer in contact with the airfoil surface,
delays local flow separation and aerodynamic stalling, thereby improving
the effectiveness of wings and control surfaces, such as flaps,
elevators, ailerons, and rudders.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_generator
No, nothing as specific as that - just a vague feeling of venting and spinning. Aerodynamics is one of the many, many subjects about which I know almost nothing,.
On 10/12/2024 12:39, John Hill wrote:
On 10 Dec 2024 at 10:59:18 GMT, "Jörg Lorenz" <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
On 10.12.24 11:57, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
On 10.12.24 10:18, John Hill wrote:A vortex generator (VG) is an aerodynamic device, consisting of a small
To me, Ventura sounds
like a component of a jet engine or at least something to do with
aerodynamics;
Do you mean a "Vortex Generator"?
;-)
vane usually attached to a lifting surface (or airfoil, such as an
aircraft wing)[1] or a rotor blade of a wind turbine.[2] VGs may also be >>> attached to some part of an aerodynamic vehicle such as an aircraft
fuselage or a car. When the airfoil or the body is in motion relative to >>> the air, the VG creates a vortex,[1][3] which, by removing some part of
the slow-moving boundary layer in contact with the airfoil surface,
delays local flow separation and aerodynamic stalling, thereby improving >>> the effectiveness of wings and control surfaces, such as flaps,
elevators, ailerons, and rudders.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_generator
No, nothing as specific as that - just a vague feeling of venting and
spinning. Aerodynamics is one of the many, many subjects about which I know >> almost nothing,.
Possibly you are thinking of the Venturi effect? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venturi_effect>
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 148:14:47 |
| Calls: | 10,383 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 14,054 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (1,861K bytes) |
| Messages: | 6,417,740 |
