• OT Cruise control and changing gears

    From ARW@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 10 19:59:16 2024
    So I thought that cruise control always turns off when you change gears.

    But new car and van do not.


    But to make it more confusing some of the vehicles are pretty much the
    same with different badges and they do different things.

    So

    Skoda Octavia - turns off
    Seat Leon - stays on

    Both are VW Audi


    Fiat Scudo - turns off
    Peugot Expert - turns off
    Citroen Dispatch - stays on

    All the same and French.

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?


    --
    Adam

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to ARW on Tue Dec 10 20:16:44 2024
    On 10/12/2024 19:59, ARW wrote:
    So I thought that cruise control always turns off when you change gears.

    But new car and van do not.


    But to make it more confusing some of the vehicles are pretty much the
    same with different badges and they do different things.

    So

    Skoda Octavia - turns off
    Seat Leon - stays on

    Both are VW Audi


    Fiat Scudo - turns off
    Peugot Expert - turns off
    Citroen Dispatch - stays on

    All the same and French.

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    On our Honda, the CC remains engaged so I can keep a constant speed if
    the road starts to climb and I need to change down. The CC does exactly
    what I would do without it: come right off the power while the clutch is
    down and there is no load on the engine; and adjust throttle so the car
    keeps a constant speed in a different gear with a different load on the
    engine.

    It would be a pain to have to turn it back on every time I changed gear.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to ARW on Tue Dec 10 20:24:39 2024
    ARW wrote:

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    Possibly for the Skoda/Seat by a VCDS cable, but info about the exact
    codes to do it seems vague, it might vary depending if there's an extra
    switch on the clutch pedal.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mm0fmf@21:1/5 to ARW on Tue Dec 10 22:57:03 2024
    On 10/12/2024 19:59, ARW wrote:
    So I thought that cruise control always turns off when you change gears.

    But new car and van do not.


    But to make it more confusing some of the vehicles are pretty much the
    same with different badges and they do different things.

    So

    Skoda Octavia - turns off
    Seat Leon - stays on

    Both are VW Audi


    Fiat Scudo - turns off
    Peugot Expert - turns off
    Citroen Dispatch - stays on

    All the same and French.

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?


    My old Audi diesel cruise stayed on and the owners manual said that you
    had to use the clutch to change gear or the engine would race till the hydraulic tappets limited the revs! The clutch was the temp disengage.
    As I never was in to clutch-less changes, it worked perfectly for me. It
    also had rev tweeking so as you lifted your foot off the clutch, the
    revs were boosted a little giving super smooth changes.

    I didn't know that not all cruise controls will apply the brakes like it
    did if you over shot the speed on a hill descent. The brakes started
    coming on when you went 5mph faster.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to ARW on Wed Dec 11 11:00:25 2024
    On 10/12/2024 19:59, ARW wrote:
    So I thought that cruise control always turns off when you change gears.

    But new car and van do not.


    But to make it more confusing some of the vehicles are pretty much the
    same with different badges and they do different things.

    So

    Skoda Octavia - turns off
    Seat Leon - stays on

    Both are VW Audi


    Fiat Scudo - turns off
    Peugot Expert - turns off
    Citroen Dispatch - stays on

    All the same and French.

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    All the cars that I have driven, with cruise control, have turned it off
    when the clutch is pressed. Indeed, I have often momentarily dipped the
    clutch to start dropping in speed prior to a stop, rather than press the
    more fiddly disengage button.

    I'd certainly want it to disengage when I change gears, as I'd likely be speeding up and need a new setpoint or slowing down to either a new
    speed or stop.

    Not a worry for me though, as my daily car is an EV and has no gears and
    my others cars have no cruise control.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to SteveW on Wed Dec 11 12:53:56 2024
    SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 10/12/2024 19:59, ARW wrote:
    So I thought that cruise control always turns off when you change gears.

    But new car and van do not.


    But to make it more confusing some of the vehicles are pretty much the
    same with different badges and they do different things.

    So

    Skoda Octavia - turns off
    Seat Leon - stays on

    Both are VW Audi


    Fiat Scudo - turns off
    Peugot Expert - turns off
    Citroen Dispatch - stays on

    All the same and French.

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    All the cars that I have driven, with cruise control, have turned it off
    when the clutch is pressed. Indeed, I have often momentarily dipped the clutch to start dropping in speed prior to a stop, rather than press the
    more fiddly disengage button.

    We’ve had both types of CC in our cars. The first time I came across the “non-cutting out” variety it was quite disconcerting. You dab the brakes approaching a roundabout say only to have it start accelerating again.

    After a pretty short learning curve I soon got used to it though and I
    don’t recall it being a problem after the initial surprise.

    Tim


    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 11 14:00:33 2024
    On 11/12/2024 12:53, Tim+ wrote:
    We’ve had both types of CC in our cars. The first time I came across the “non-cutting out” variety it was quite disconcerting. You dab the brakes approaching a roundabout say only to have it start accelerating again.

    After a pretty short learning curve I soon got used to it though and I don’t recall it being a problem after the initial surprise.

    Mine cuts out on brake application.
    You have to resume it.
    Being an automatic the gearchanges are integrated...


    --
    I would rather have questions that cannot be answered...
    ...than to have answers that cannot be questioned

    Richard Feynman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ARW@21:1/5 to SteveW on Wed Dec 11 18:37:55 2024
    On 11/12/2024 11:00, SteveW wrote:
    On 10/12/2024 19:59, ARW wrote:
    So I thought that cruise control always turns off when you change gears.

    But new car and van do not.


    But to make it more confusing some of the vehicles are pretty much the
    same with different badges and they do different things.

    So

    Skoda Octavia - turns off
    Seat Leon - stays on

    Both are VW Audi


    Fiat Scudo - turns off
    Peugot Expert - turns off
    Citroen Dispatch - stays on

    All the same and French.

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    All the cars that I have driven, with cruise control, have turned it off
    when the clutch is pressed. Indeed, I have often momentarily dipped the clutch to start dropping in speed prior to a stop, rather than press the
    more fiddly disengage button.

    I'd certainly want it to disengage when I change gears, as I'd likely be speeding up and need a new setpoint or slowing down to either a new
    speed or stop.

    Not a worry for me though, as my daily car is an EV and has no gears and
    my others cars have no cruise control.


    The reason I want it to disengage when changing gear is that for example
    in a 30 limit I approach a bend that would require you to slow down and
    drop a gear. I prefer not to use the brakes as I was taught that way.

    Although Chris mentions gearing down for a hill as his reason to do the opposite. I'll now be seeing how often I have to gear down for a hill.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to ARW on Wed Dec 11 19:00:15 2024
    On 11/12/2024 18:37, ARW wrote:
    The reason I want it to disengage when changing gear is that for example
    in a 30 limit I approach a bend that would require you to slow down and
    drop a gear. I prefer not to use the brakes as I was taught that way.

    Well in the end you earn to drive the car you have to the best of your
    ability

    Although Chris mentions gearing down for a hill as his reason to do the opposite. I'll now be seeing how often I have to gear down for a hill.

    Or simply apply brakes
    --
    The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly
    diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
    into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
    what it actually is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 11 20:49:49 2024
    On 11/12/2024 12:53, Tim+ wrote:
    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    All the cars that I have driven, with cruise control, have turned it off
    when the clutch is pressed. Indeed, I have often momentarily dipped the
    clutch to start dropping in speed prior to a stop, rather than press the
    more fiddly disengage button.

    We’ve had both types of CC in our cars. The first time I came across the “non-cutting out” variety it was quite disconcerting. You dab the brakes approaching a roundabout say only to have it start accelerating again.

    After a pretty short learning curve I soon got used to it though and I don’t recall it being a problem after the initial surprise.

    I thought that all CCs disengaged when you pressed the footbrake, but
    that some allowed it to continue when you press and release the clutch
    as part of changing gear.

    When CC is engaged, I tend to keep my right thumb within reach of the
    disengage button so I can turn it off at the same point as I would
    release the accelerator prior to braking in a car without CC.

    On a motorway I have become adept at disengaging CC if I come up behind
    a slower car and I am blocked from moving into the lane on my right, and
    then pressing the resume button as soon as the overtaking car on my
    right is far enough ahead of me that I can return to 70 or whatever my
    chosen speed is.

    My wife's Honda CR-V has a CC that remains engaged when you change gear.
    My Peugeot 308 doesn't have CC but I borrowed a newer Pug in the 20x
    range (*) which had it, and I *think* that also remained enabled after a
    gear change. Both disengaged as soon as the footbrake was pressed. The
    Honda doesn't let you set CC for less than 20 mph, though the speed
    limiter works down to a much lower speed.


    (*) I remember it had a 3-cylinder engine which was much smoother and
    more lively than I was expecting but which made a very loud,
    head-turning and highly embarrassing WOOOF bark when you accelerated in
    first or second.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 11 20:20:30 2024
    On 10/12/2024 22:57, mm0fmf wrote:
    I didn't know that not all cruise controls will apply the brakes like it
    did if you over shot the speed on a hill descent. The brakes started
    coming on when you went 5mph faster

    I think CC that controls the car's speed with the brakes as well as the throttle are regarded as a more expensive option: one car that I
    considered buying had throttle-only and throttle-and-brake CC as two
    different optional extras.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Dec 11 20:49:56 2024
    On 11/12/2024 19:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 18:37, ARW wrote:
    Although Chris mentions gearing down for a hill as his reason to do
    the opposite. I'll now be seeing how often I have to gear down for a
    hill.

    Or simply apply brakes

    I tend to change down just before the start of the hill while I'm on the
    level (*) if it is a long steep one (Sutton Bank, Porlock Hill, or the
    one near Broadway), though disc brakes are a lot less prone to fading
    than drum brakes were. I'm not sure which my last car was that had drum
    brakes. My wife remembers being a passenger in a friend's motor-caravan
    with drum brakes all round going down Porlock Hill and there were clouds
    of smoke coming from the brakes by the bottom because he didn't know
    about changing to a lower gear for extra engine braking.

    I tend to choose a gear that gives me about 2500-3000 rpm in a diesel
    car or a bit more in a petrol, and supplementing that with less
    footbrake than otherwise. But that's only on long steep hills, and even
    on those I wonder how necessary it is in a modern car.



    (*) I remember the infamous Dibble's Bridge coach crash between Pateley
    Bridge and Grassington, when a coach got out of control because the
    driver missed engaging a lower gear on the descent, and then couldn't
    engage *any* gear so he went down in neutral (effectively) and the
    brakes weren't good enough. Every time I go down there, I think of the
    people that died in that crash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to ARW on Wed Dec 11 20:49:53 2024
    On 11/12/2024 18:37, ARW wrote:

    The reason I want it to disengage when changing gear is that for example
    in a 30 limit I approach a bend that would require you to slow down and
    drop a gear. I prefer not to use the brakes as I was taught that way.

    I suppose I would manually cancel the CC at the same place where I would
    come off the power in a non-CC car, some distance before I considered
    braking and/or changing gear.

    I also tend to stay in the same gear as I go round the bend (unless I
    need engine braking) and change when I want to accelerate out of the
    bend as it straightens out.

    I also try to brake before the bend on the straight and not during the
    bend - unless it is a downhill bend where coming off the brakes on the
    bend would make me speed up too much. But mostly I try to avoid braking
    by planning ahead and coming off the power earlier than I would have
    done before I learned that technique as part of taking and passing my
    IAM advanced test.

    I must be doing something right because my present car has reached a
    smidgen under 200,000 miles on its original clutch. I've never had a car
    that has lasted that long on one clutch; in previous cars I've needed a
    new clutch at about 80-90,000. I reckon if the car can still do a
    hill-start on a 1:3 hill, the clutch is still OK! I got stuck behind a non-local who ground to a halt on Rosedale Chimney near me in North
    Yorkshire, so I had to a) do a hill-start in his car after he rolled
    further back, using up the large safety distance that I had left from
    his car, and I thought "this guy needs my help otherwise he's going to
    hit me", and b) in my own car once I got back to it after my errand of
    mercy. I was quite proud that I got into a strange car with unknown
    clutch bite point and petrol when I'm used to diesel, and only stalled
    the first time but I didn't roll back an inch because I'm used to only releasing the handbrake when the car actually starts to strain forwards.
    Doing the same hill-start in my car afterwards was so much easier
    because the extra torque meant I didn't need to run the engine as fast
    to overcome gravity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to me@privacy.net on Wed Dec 11 21:18:06 2024
    NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:

    On a motorway I have become adept at disengaging CC if I come up behind
    a slower car and I am blocked from moving into the lane on my right, and
    then pressing the resume button as soon as the overtaking car on my
    right is far enough ahead of me that I can return to 70 or whatever my
    chosen speed is.

    Our Skoda Superb does that all for you, it detects the car in front
    and slows down, then accelerates back to the CC set speed when the
    lane is clear (or you pull out to the empty outside lane).

    The Skoda seems to switch between two modes when CC is on, in one mode
    lifting off the accelerator applies the regenerative brake, in the
    other mode it just coasts when yoiu release the brake. We've not yet discovered how you swithc modes! :-)

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to me@privacy.net on Wed Dec 11 22:30:17 2024
    NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 12:53, Tim+ wrote:
    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    All the cars that I have driven, with cruise control, have turned it off >>> when the clutch is pressed. Indeed, I have often momentarily dipped the
    clutch to start dropping in speed prior to a stop, rather than press the >>> more fiddly disengage button.

    We’ve had both types of CC in our cars. The first time I came across the >> “non-cutting out” variety it was quite disconcerting. You dab the brakes
    approaching a roundabout say only to have it start accelerating again.

    After a pretty short learning curve I soon got used to it though and I
    don’t recall it being a problem after the initial surprise.

    I thought that all CCs disengaged when you pressed the footbrake, but
    that some allowed it to continue when you press and release the clutch
    as part of changing gear.

    Ah, you are almost certainly right. I was probably just misremembering
    which pedal I dabbed. Certainly touching the brakes ought to disengage a
    CC.

    Tim


    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to ARW on Wed Dec 11 22:37:08 2024
    On 11/12/2024 18:37, ARW wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 11:00, SteveW wrote:
    On 10/12/2024 19:59, ARW wrote:
    So I thought that cruise control always turns off when you change gears. >>>
    But new car and van do not.


    But to make it more confusing some of the vehicles are pretty much
    the same with different badges and they do different things.

    So

    Skoda Octavia - turns off
    Seat Leon - stays on

    Both are VW Audi


    Fiat Scudo - turns off
    Peugot Expert - turns off
    Citroen Dispatch - stays on

    All the same and French.

    I want it to turn off when I change gear but cannot find a way of
    altering the settings. Is there a way?

    All the cars that I have driven, with cruise control, have turned it
    off when the clutch is pressed. Indeed, I have often momentarily
    dipped the clutch to start dropping in speed prior to a stop, rather
    than press the more fiddly disengage button.

    I'd certainly want it to disengage when I change gears, as I'd likely
    be speeding up and need a new setpoint or slowing down to either a new
    speed or stop.

    Not a worry for me though, as my daily car is an EV and has no gears
    and my others cars have no cruise control.


    The reason I want it to disengage when changing gear is that for example
    in a 30 limit I approach a bend that would require you to slow down and
    drop a gear. I prefer not to use the brakes as I was taught that way.

    Time you went on a driving style update. If you were forced to have a
    re-test you may Modern cars are designed to be slowed by the brakes and
    have weedy clutches.. From the Institute of Advanced Motorists

    https://www.iam-bristol.org.uk/index.php/articles/driving-tips/76-brakes-to-slow-gears-to-go

    "Those of us who were taught to drive years ago were conditioned to move
    our way up and down the gear box systematically – 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1. But that's because vehicles in those days had inferior brakes and we needed
    to bring the cars to a halt by using the drag of the transmission.

    These days, we recommend "block changing". Use the brakes to slow down,
    then, when the speed is right; choose the gear that is best for that
    speed. So, when approaching a red traffic light you may move from fifth
    gear, say, straight to first, after you have finished braking. Brake
    pads are cheaper to replace than clutches and transmission."


    Although Chris mentions gearing down for a hill as his reason to do the opposite. I'll now be seeing how often I have to gear down for a hill.


    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to David Wade on Thu Dec 12 00:08:42 2024
    On 11/12/2024 22:37, David Wade wrote:
    The reason I want it to disengage when changing gear is that for
    example in a 30 limit I approach a bend that would require you to slow
    down and drop a gear. I prefer not to use the brakes as I was taught
    that way.

    Time you went on a driving style update. If you were forced to have a
    re-test you may Modern cars are designed to be slowed by the brakes and
    have weedy clutches.. From the Institute of Advanced Motorists

    https://www.iam-bristol.org.uk/index.php/articles/driving-tips/76- brakes-to-slow-gears-to-go

    "Those of us who were taught to drive years ago were conditioned to move
    our way up and down the gear box systematically – 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1.  But that's because vehicles in those days had inferior brakes and we needed
    to bring the cars to a halt by using the drag of the transmission.

    These days, we recommend "block changing".  Use the brakes to slow down, then, when the speed is right; choose the gear that is best for that
    speed.  So, when approaching a red traffic light you may move from fifth gear, say, straight to first, after you have finished braking.  Brake
    pads are cheaper to replace than clutches and transmission."

    I thought the IAM had recommended block changing for a long time.
    Depends when "these days" is ;-)

    I can remember in the mid seventies when my mum prepared for her IAM
    test she found it difficult to get used to block changing, so it must
    have been taught then.

    When I took my ordinary test in 1981, I was taught to change down
    sequentially because that was what the test required in those days. But
    my instructor was an ex police Class 1 instructor and after I passed my
    test he confessed that it pained him greatly to teach sequential
    changing because the police and other advanced drivers had been block
    changing "for years". I'd find it very difficult to go back to changing
    down from 6 -> 5 -> 4 -> 3 -> 2 -> 1 as I did for my test. Block
    changing and progressive braking took a bit to master ten years later
    for my IAM test, but they are deeply engrained now, like push-pull
    steering (ie not letting either hand pass the 12 o'clock point in normal driving). Mind you, I evolved a technique of making the fewest number of
    the largest movements (12 to 6 o'clock, then 6 to 12 with the opposite
    hand) whereas I was taught a slower, more fussy technique of making a
    lot more smaller movements, as seen on the unintentionally hilarious
    film "Journey Without Incident" made by the IAM's chief examiner in
    1963, featuring very obviously stages incidents and a cringe-makingly
    bad bit of road-rage by the examiner when a lane-hogging car wouldn't
    move out of his way. "I shall flash my lights. He hasn't seen me so I
    shall sound my horn. He still hasn't seen me, so I'll do it again... and again." That would be regarded as OTT even by today's standards, so I
    dread to think what a 1963 audience would have thought.

    I'm not sure when the ordinary test first allowed (or even encouraged)
    block changing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 10:14:39 2024
    On 11/12/2024 20:49, NY wrote:
    I also tend to stay in the same gear as I go round the bend (unless I
    need engine braking) and change when I want to accelerate out of the
    bend as it straightens out.
    That's when I get frustrated at your inability to drive and overtake you.

    --
    "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign,
    that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."

    Jonathan Swift.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 11:08:33 2024
    On 11/12/2024 20:49, NY wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 19:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 18:37, ARW wrote:
    Although Chris mentions gearing down for a hill as his reason to do
    the opposite. I'll now be seeing how often I have to gear down for a
    hill.

    Or simply apply brakes

    I tend to change down just before the start of the hill while I'm on the level (*) if it is a long steep one (Sutton Bank, Porlock Hill, or the
    one near Broadway), though disc brakes are a lot less prone to fading
    than drum brakes were. I'm not sure which my last car was that had drum brakes. My wife remembers being a passenger in a friend's motor-caravan
    with drum brakes all round going down Porlock Hill and there were clouds
    of smoke coming from the brakes by the bottom because he didn't know
    about changing to a lower gear for extra engine braking.

    Most peoples recollection of Porlock hill is the clouds of smoke and
    steam after going UP it :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to Andrew on Thu Dec 12 14:02:23 2024
    On 12/12/2024 11:08, Andrew wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 20:49, NY wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 19:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 18:37, ARW wrote:
    Although Chris mentions gearing down for a hill as his reason to do
    the opposite. I'll now be seeing how often I have to gear down for a
    hill.

    Or simply apply brakes

    I tend to change down just before the start of the hill while I'm on
    the level (*) if it is a long steep one (Sutton Bank, Porlock Hill, or
    the one near Broadway), though disc brakes are a lot less prone to
    fading than drum brakes were. I'm not sure which my last car was that
    had drum brakes. My wife remembers being a passenger in a friend's
    motor-caravan with drum brakes all round going down Porlock Hill and
    there were clouds of smoke coming from the brakes by the bottom
    because he didn't know about changing to a lower gear for extra engine
    braking.

    Most peoples recollection of Porlock hill is the clouds of smoke and
    steam after going UP it :-)

    My recollection is of the "Unsuitable for caravans" signs being hidden
    by foliage (we came back later and found them) and my father driving up
    it in an old and tired Austin 1800, while towing a Sprite Musketeer. We
    got up it okay, passing a number of stopped and overheated cars on the way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From fred@21:1/5 to me@privacy.net on Thu Dec 12 17:21:57 2024
    NY <me@privacy.net> wrote in news:j6qcndoJMulpZ8T6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@brightview.co.uk:

    On 11/12/2024 19:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 18:37, ARW wrote:
    Although Chris mentions gearing down for a hill as his reason to do
    the opposite. I'll now be seeing how often I have to gear down for a
    hill.

    Or simply apply brakes


    (*) I remember the infamous Dibble's Bridge coach crash between Pateley Bridge and Grassington, when a coach got out of control because the
    driver missed engaging a lower gear on the descent, and then couldn't
    engage *any* gear so he went down in neutral (effectively) and the
    brakes weren't good enough. Every time I go down there, I think of the
    people that died in that crash.

    A fateful story and it would appear that lessons were not learned with
    near identical crashes 50yrs apart:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1925_Dibbles_Bridge_coach_crash

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Dibbles_Bridge_coach_crash

    Technology moves on and with the development of heavy duty disk brakes
    this should be a thing of the past, new pad bedding in excepted. Also in
    those days coaches would be 'coach built' lightweight bodies on a rigid
    chassis susceptible to collapse and crushing on roll over. I think these
    days that like train carriages they are required to be roll over and
    crush protected structures. Modern coaches have seatbelts now too.

    Back on topic my Mk 3 Octavia does not cancel CC on gear change which is
    pretty much how I like it, I might change down to increase acceleration
    on a resume so don't want it knocked off during that. On slowing down for
    bends or other obstacles in a 30 I'll usually knock it off for the
    duration and then resume. I'll also knock it off for potential hazards
    ahead so that the car will already be decelerating from any throttle
    lift-off before my foot reaches the brake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Dec 12 23:59:14 2024
    On 12/12/2024 10:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 20:49, NY wrote:
    I also tend to stay in the same gear as I go round the bend (unless I
    need engine braking) and change when I want to accelerate out of the
    bend as it straightens out.
     That's when I get frustrated at your inability to drive and overtake you.

    When the car is slowing down due to braking and the engine is on
    overrun, how does it benefit you to change down unless you need engine
    braking? All that matters is that you are able to change - maybe
    directly, 6th to 3rd - to the correct gear for accelerating out of the bend.

    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard are long
    gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 10:38:08 2024
    On 12/12/2024 23:59, NY wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 10:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 20:49, NY wrote:
    I also tend to stay in the same gear as I go round the bend (unless I
    need engine braking) and change when I want to accelerate out of the
    bend as it straightens out.
      That's when I get frustrated at your inability to drive and overtake
    you.

    When the car is slowing down due to braking and the engine is on
    overrun, how does it benefit you to change down unless you need engine braking? All that matters is that you are able to change - maybe
    directly, 6th to 3rd - to the correct gear for accelerating out of the
    bend.

    Because a typical gear change leads matey plodding around with no power fumbling for the gear lever and taking probably the best part of a
    second to get himself organised. He isn't driving the car, the car is
    driving him.

    Use the approach to the corner to select the gear you need to be in
    after it, just as you should change down before the steep climb.


    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard are long
    gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    I was taught not to use it in 1968/9


    --
    In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, there is.
    -- Yogi Berra

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 10:39:38 2024
    On 12/12/2024 23:59, NY wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 10:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 20:49, NY wrote:
    I also tend to stay in the same gear as I go round the bend (unless I
    need engine braking) and change when I want to accelerate out of the
    bend as it straightens out.
      That's when I get frustrated at your inability to drive and overtake you.

    When the car is slowing down due to braking and the engine is on overrun,
    how does it benefit you to change down unless you need engine braking? All that matters is that you are able to change - maybe directly, 6th to 3rd -
    to the correct gear for accelerating out of the bend.

    ... which does not require you to go around the bend in the same gear,
    you can change - maybe directly from 6th to 3rd - when you stop braking
    just before entry to the bend so you won't need to change gear whilst steering.


    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard are long
    gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Dec 13 18:13:15 2024
    On 13/12/2024 10:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 23:59, NY wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 10:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 20:49, NY wrote:
    I also tend to stay in the same gear as I go round the bend (unless
    I need engine braking) and change when I want to accelerate out of
    the bend as it straightens out.
      That's when I get frustrated at your inability to drive and
    overtake you.

    When the car is slowing down due to braking and the engine is on
    overrun, how does it benefit you to change down unless you need engine
    braking? All that matters is that you are able to change - maybe
    directly, 6th to 3rd - to the correct gear for accelerating out of the
    bend.

    Because a typical gear change leads matey plodding around with no power fumbling for the gear lever and taking probably the best part of a
    second to get himself organised. He isn't driving the car, the car is
    driving him.

    Yes, block changing, at the point that the new gear is needed, *does*
    require a bit more dexterity with the controls to do it quickly.

    Use the approach to the corner to select the gear you need to be in
    after it, just as you should change  down before the steep climb.


    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard are
    long gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    I was taught not to use it in 1968/9

    For the normal test or the IAM advanced test? My instructor told me that sequential changes were what the normal test required. After I'd passed,
    he said "sequential changes are a load of bollocks - it pains me to have
    to teach people to do it but it's what the test demands". And then he
    gave me a lesson on how to drive well rather than to pass the test - and
    one of the things he mentioned was block changes, though in just one
    "after passing" lesson he couldn't do much to retrain me. That was left
    until about 10 years later when I passed the IAM test.

    So if you were taught block changes in 1968 for the normal test then it
    must have allowed it in those days which from what I was told/taught it
    didn't in 1981.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 18:41:51 2024
    On 13/12/2024 18:13, NY wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 10:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 23:59, NY wrote:

    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard are
    long gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    I was taught not to use it in 1968/9

    For the normal test or the IAM advanced test?
    Normal test.

    My instructor told me that
    sequential changes were what the normal test required. After I'd passed,
    he said "sequential changes are a load of bollocks - it pains me to have
    to teach people to do it but it's what the test demands". And then he
    gave me a lesson on how to drive well rather than to pass the test - and
    one of the things he mentioned was block changes, though in just one
    "after passing" lesson he couldn't do much to retrain me. That was left
    until about 10 years later when I passed the IAM test.

    So if you were taught block changes in 1968 for the normal test then it
    must have allowed it in those days which from what I was told/taught it didn't in 1981.

    *shrug*. plenty of idiots on the roads who cant really drive, and the
    test is merely a bit of paper.

    In the end you learn to drive after test because you want to be safer
    and faster or you never learn anything ever again.

    --
    “There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”

    —Soren Kierkegaard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Dec 13 22:31:13 2024
    On 13/12/2024 18:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 18:13, NY wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 10:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 23:59, NY wrote:

    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard are
    long gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    I was taught not to use it in 1968/9

    For the normal test or the IAM advanced test?
    Normal test.

    My instructor told me that sequential changes were what the normal
    test required. After I'd passed, he said "sequential changes are a
    load of bollocks - it pains me to have to teach people to do it but
    it's what the test demands". And then he gave me a lesson on how to
    drive well rather than to pass the test - and one of the things he
    mentioned was block changes, though in just one "after passing" lesson
    he couldn't do much to retrain me. That was left until about 10 years
    later when I passed the IAM test.

    So if you were taught block changes in 1968 for the normal test then
    it must have allowed it in those days which from what I was told/
    taught it didn't in 1981.

    *shrug*. plenty of idiots on the roads who cant really drive, and the
    test is merely a bit of paper.

    In the end you learn to drive after test because you want to be safer
    and faster or you never learn anything ever again.


    This is very weird. I'd always understood that sequential changes were mandatory for the normal test until a couple of decades ago (long after
    I passed my test), even if Roadcraft and the IAM had been recommending
    block changes for a long time before that. My instructor had been a
    Police Class 1 driving instructor before he retired, so he would have
    taught me block changes if the test had allowed it - that's what he told
    me once I passed, when he was giving me a "now I'll show you how to
    drive properly rather than to pass the test" lesson. I wonder if he had misunderstood what the test required and maybe block changes *were*
    allowed as an alternative to sequential, which would fit in with your experience. One of life's mysteries.

    I remember when I was preparing for my advanced test in 1990, it took a
    bit of un-learning to get out of the habit of sequential changes, and
    also to learn how to brake progressively - gently at first, gradually increasing, then decreasing again to almost no brake as the car was
    about to come to rest, which gave smoother braking. Push-pull of the
    steering wheel came fairly easily, even though I'd got into bad habits
    before then.

    A few years after passing the IAM test, I was part of a group who was
    learning at night school how to make videos. The story that we devised
    had a scene which needed some interior driving shots. I offered to be
    the driver whose hands would be seen. The guy who was in charge said
    "you drive too much like an expert or a traffic cop, rather than like a
    normal person" so I had to cross my hands and do the "mechanic's grip"
    (palm facing me, gripping the steering wheel from the opposite side) in
    the interests of "art" ;-) I actually found it surprisingly difficult to regress to older ways.

    Hopefully my IAM lessons have taught me a little bit of a sixth-sense as
    to what other drivers might be about to do, and to drive more
    efficiently, making clutch, brake and tyres last a bit longer. I'm a
    long way off being perfect, but maybe I'm slightly better than average. Certainly I control my speed with my accelerator rather than my
    footbrake more than many people - lifting off the power earlier and
    letting friction, air resistance and gradient slow me down initially,
    whereas I've ridden with some people who are either on the power or on
    the footbrake with nothing in between.

    The one skill I've never been able to learn (never mind master!) is double-declutching because I've only ever driven cars with working
    synchromesh so you can never tell whether you are doing it right or
    wrong because the gear will engage equally easily in either case. But I
    do try my best to rev-match after I've engaged the new gear and I'm
    about to bring the clutch up. I had the misfortune to get a lift with
    someone (my boss, which made things difficult!) who had been taught to
    come right off the power at each gearchange, let the clutch up on an
    idling engine (*) and then apply power. When she had apologised for her
    jerky gearchanges and wondered if she was doing something wrong, I took
    that as an opportunity to make some very tentative underling-to-boss suggestions about watching the rev counter and increasing or decreasing
    the engine speed by about 500 rpm when going from one gear to another immediately above or below, which is good as a starting point, even if
    the "500 rpm" figure varies from one car to another and even between
    different gears on the same car. *Anything* is better than letting the
    clutch up on an idling engine, both for the passengers and the clutch
    plates ;-)


    (*) Like trains drivers had to do on early diesel multiple units because
    a long period of idling was needed to allow all the different gearboxes
    up and down the train to get into the same gear. I remember the very
    jerky acceleration of trains on the Aylesbury-Marylebone line as they
    set off from each station, because of this limitation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 14 10:51:07 2024
    On 13/12/2024 22:31, NY wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 18:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 18:13, NY wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 10:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 23:59, NY wrote:

    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard are
    long gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    I was taught not to use it in 1968/9

    For the normal test or the IAM advanced test?
    Normal test.

    My instructor told me that sequential changes were what the normal
    test required. After I'd passed, he said "sequential changes are a
    load of bollocks - it pains me to have to teach people to do it but
    it's what the test demands". And then he gave me a lesson on how to
    drive well rather than to pass the test - and one of the things he
    mentioned was block changes, though in just one "after passing"
    lesson he couldn't do much to retrain me. That was left until about
    10 years later when I passed the IAM test.

    So if you were taught block changes in 1968 for the normal test then
    it must have allowed it in those days which from what I was told/
    taught it didn't in 1981.

    *shrug*. plenty of idiots on the roads who cant really drive, and the
    test is merely a bit of paper.

    In the end you learn to drive after test because you want to be safer
    and faster or you never learn anything ever again.


    This is very weird. I'd always understood that sequential changes were mandatory for the normal test until a couple of decades ago (long after
    I passed my test), even if Roadcraft and the IAM had been recommending
    block changes for a long time before that. My instructor had been a
    Police Class 1 driving instructor before he retired, so he would have
    taught me block changes if the test had allowed it - that's what he told
    me once I passed, when he was giving me a "now I'll show you how to
    drive properly rather than to pass the test" lesson. I wonder if he had misunderstood what the test required and maybe block changes *were*
    allowed as an alternative to sequential, which would fit in with your experience. One of life's mysteries.

    The rationale in those days that because disc brakes at leats in the
    front were the norm, engine braking placed unnecessary wear on the
    engine which was expensive compared to the brakes which were cheap to
    replace.
    My instructor taught both styles, but he said that in normal driving a
    4th to 2nd transition *before* the corner was smooth and safer. He
    absolutely did not like changing gear in the corner or after the corner.


    I remember when I was preparing for my advanced test in 1990, it took a
    bit of un-learning to get out of the habit of sequential changes, and
    also to learn how to brake progressively - gently at first, gradually increasing, then decreasing again to almost no brake as the car was
    about to come to rest, which gave smoother braking. Push-pull of the
    steering wheel came fairly easily, even though I'd got into bad habits
    before then.

    A few years after passing the IAM test, I was part of a group who was learning at night school how to make videos. The story that we devised
    had a scene which needed some interior driving shots. I offered to be
    the driver whose hands would be seen. The guy who was in charge said
    "you drive too much like an expert or a traffic cop, rather than like a normal person" so I had to cross my hands and do the "mechanic's grip"
    (palm facing me, gripping the steering wheel from the opposite side) in
    the interests of "art" ;-) I actually found it surprisingly difficult to regress to older ways.

    Hopefully my IAM lessons have taught me a little bit of a sixth-sense as
    to what other drivers might be about to do, and to drive more
    efficiently, making clutch, brake and tyres last a bit longer. I'm a
    long way off being perfect, but maybe I'm slightly better than average. Certainly I control my speed with my accelerator rather than my
    footbrake more than many people - lifting off the power earlier and
    letting friction, air resistance and gradient slow me down initially,
    whereas I've ridden with some people who are either on the power or on
    the footbrake with nothing in between.

    I never took the IAM test, but I read up on it and thought that by and
    large it was pretty good common sanse and mostly how I driove anyway, so adopted pertty much all of it.

    The one skill I've never been able to learn (never mind master!) is double-declutching because I've only ever driven cars with working synchromesh so you can never tell whether you are doing it right or
    wrong because the gear will engage equally easily in either case.

    Oh you can. The key is the engine revs don't change when you let the
    clutch out.

    Also heel and toeing is a pretty vital skill if you want to go fast -
    that allows you to change gear as you brake into a corner....



    --
    Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early
    twenty-first century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally average temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and,
    on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer
    projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a rollback of the industrial age.

    Richard Lindzen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to me@privacy.net on Sat Dec 14 12:43:51 2024
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:31:13 +0000
    NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:

    On 13/12/2024 18:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 18:13, NY wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 10:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 12/12/2024 23:59, NY wrote:

    The days of changing down sequentially as you approach a hazard
    are long gone - thankfully. What a palaver that was.

    I was taught not to use it in 1968/9

    For the normal test or the IAM advanced test?
    Normal test.

    My instructor told me that sequential changes were what the normal
    test required. After I'd passed, he said "sequential changes are a
    load of bollocks - it pains me to have to teach people to do it
    but it's what the test demands". And then he gave me a lesson on
    how to drive well rather than to pass the test - and one of the
    things he mentioned was block changes, though in just one "after
    passing" lesson he couldn't do much to retrain me. That was left
    until about 10 years later when I passed the IAM test.

    So if you were taught block changes in 1968 for the normal test
    then it must have allowed it in those days which from what I was
    told/ taught it didn't in 1981.

    *shrug*. plenty of idiots on the roads who cant really drive, and
    the test is merely a bit of paper.

    In the end you learn to drive after test because you want to be
    safer and faster or you never learn anything ever again.


    This is very weird. I'd always understood that sequential changes
    were mandatory for the normal test until a couple of decades ago
    (long after I passed my test), even if Roadcraft and the IAM had been recommending block changes for a long time before that. My instructor
    had been a Police Class 1 driving instructor before he retired, so he
    would have taught me block changes if the test had allowed it -
    that's what he told me once I passed, when he was giving me a "now
    I'll show you how to drive properly rather than to pass the test"
    lesson. I wonder if he had misunderstood what the test required and
    maybe block changes *were* allowed as an alternative to sequential,
    which would fit in with your experience. One of life's mysteries.

    I remember when I was preparing for my advanced test in 1990, it took
    a bit of un-learning to get out of the habit of sequential changes,
    and also to learn how to brake progressively - gently at first,
    gradually increasing, then decreasing again to almost no brake as the
    car was about to come to rest, which gave smoother braking. Push-pull
    of the steering wheel came fairly easily, even though I'd got into
    bad habits before then.

    A few years after passing the IAM test, I was part of a group who was learning at night school how to make videos. The story that we
    devised had a scene which needed some interior driving shots. I
    offered to be the driver whose hands would be seen. The guy who was
    in charge said "you drive too much like an expert or a traffic cop,
    rather than like a normal person" so I had to cross my hands and do
    the "mechanic's grip" (palm facing me, gripping the steering wheel
    from the opposite side) in the interests of "art" ;-) I actually
    found it surprisingly difficult to regress to older ways.

    Hopefully my IAM lessons have taught me a little bit of a sixth-sense
    as to what other drivers might be about to do, and to drive more
    efficiently, making clutch, brake and tyres last a bit longer. I'm a
    long way off being perfect, but maybe I'm slightly better than
    average. Certainly I control my speed with my accelerator rather than
    my footbrake more than many people - lifting off the power earlier
    and letting friction, air resistance and gradient slow me down
    initially, whereas I've ridden with some people who are either on the
    power or on the footbrake with nothing in between.

    I once had a lift in a Cortina Estate, in which the driver used a
    consistent method of dropping the clutch after each gear change, with
    the engine at idle. It was horrible and I was surprised his girlfriend
    appeared to accept it without comment. Clutch life must have been
    measured in moths rather than years.

    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Davey on Sat Dec 14 15:47:00 2024
    On 14/12/2024 12:43, Davey wrote:
    Clutch life must have been
    measured in moths rather than years.

    An interesting unit, the Moth.

    I have never ever replaced a clutch on any car I ever drove.

    Except after a total engine out/rebore/regrind/ lighten/balance/hot
    camshaft swap, and that wasn't because it was gone, but because it was
    cheap and easy to do.

    People who slip the clutch rather than changing down make my hackles rise.

    There is no need. Apart from starting from rest.

    If tou cant do clutch control properly buy an automatic.


    --
    “The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to
    fill the world with fools.”

    Herbert Spencer

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sat Dec 14 23:57:04 2024
    On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 15:47:00 +0000
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 14/12/2024 12:43, Davey wrote:
    Clutch life must have been
    measured in moths rather than years.

    An interesting unit, the Moth.

    I have never ever replaced a clutch on any car I ever drove.

    Except after a total engine out/rebore/regrind/ lighten/balance/hot
    camshaft swap, and that wasn't because it was gone, but because it
    was cheap and easy to do.

    People who slip the clutch rather than changing down make my hackles
    rise.

    There is no need. Apart from starting from rest.

    If tou cant do clutch control properly buy an automatic.



    I'll trade my moth for your tou.

    Ditto on the clutch replacement, only done when the engine or gearbox
    was out, and it made sense to do it at the time. I had a slave cylinder
    failure once, but that was not the clutch disk itself.

    On double-declutching, I knew when I was learning to drive that I would
    be owning and driving 'older' vehicles, so my Dad taught me that skill
    from the start. He had learned it in the Army during WWII, on lorries,
    and was one of those who never had to pass a civilian driving test. I
    got so used to doing it, that even now I find it difficult to not do it
    when driving any manual. Who needs synchromesh?

    I once (1972) worked for a summer at a major soft-drink distributor, and
    did various random jobs in the Transport office. One of them was to list
    the service invoices for the company's service vans. Automatic
    transmission was getting more common, and there was a big spike for
    manual gearbox vans at about 30,000 miles, due to clutch replacements,
    that just was not there with the automatics.

    My boss, who was a family friend, came over to me one day and told me
    to come with him, we were going for a test drive. We took the brand new
    Morris Marina out, and we ended up at a lonely empty roundabout, going
    round faster and faster. Eventually, the rear axle complained, and
    started a massive tramping. My boss said: "It's terrible. We'll take 30
    of them". He didn't have to drive them, but the poor salesmen did.

    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)