• Re: NVMe -v- SSD From Factor

    From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Tue Dec 31 15:00:39 2024
    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of the old spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology from
    the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with spinning
    platters.

    Both are available in the 2.5" standard drive bay format [1].

    Both SSD and HDDs can come equipped with a SATA [2] interfaces.

    and NVMe the long strip storage device, if
    there's a better way please let me know!

    The form factor of what you are describing is M.2. M.2 drives are a
    standard width - but available in a number of standard lengths. All M.2
    drives are SSDs. Some have a SATA interface (and the same 6 Gbps speed
    limit of the larger SATA drives). (you can tell which is which - the
    SATA version has an extra key in the edge connector which will stop a
    NVMe drive plugging into a SATA only socket)

    NVMe (Non Volatile Memory Express) is a different interface designed for
    easy high speed connectivity with modern PCs. [3]




    [1] If you have ever wondered about the sizes - in the home computer era
    and into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy.
    That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25"
    floppy, which was was 3.5" wide. The 3.5" drive was 2.5" wide - you get
    the picture :-)

    [2] Serial AT Attachment (where AT came from the IBM PC era PC "Advanced Technology" - it was an evolution or what was called ATA (now bacronymed
    to PATA), which moved much of the drive controller intelligence and
    electronics onto the drive to save needing complex drive controller
    cards in the computer. This so called "Integrated Drive Electronics"
    (IDE) drive made storage more of a commodity item and reduced costs for
    PC makers.

    [3] As the slower ISA (Industry Standard Architecture) bus of the
    original PC gave way to much faster expansion buses, eventually the PCI (Peripheral Component Interconnect) bus came to dominate. PCI itself
    evolved from a parallel form to a serial form, and now PCI express
    (PCIe) is common on most motherboards. NVMe drives are a good fit for
    that giving much more interface throughput.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Tue Dec 31 15:33:32 2024
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" floppy,
    which was  was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Tue Dec 31 17:35:57 2024
    John Rumm wrote:

    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. That
    happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" floppy,
    which was  was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common use?
    I don't think there ever was, but you seemed to be saying 8" floppies
    were actually 5¼", and 5¼" floppies were actually 3½" etc, and so on?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Dec 31 17:19:42 2024
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. That
    happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" floppy,
    which was  was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common use?

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Dec 31 17:44:35 2024
    On 31/12/2024 17:35, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy.
    That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25"
    floppy, which was  was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common use?
    I don't think there ever was, but you seemed to be saying 8" floppies
    were actually 5¼", and 5¼" floppies were actually 3½" etc, and so on?

    No I was saying (possibly not very clearly!) that the length of each new
    format matched the width of the previous one. So if you keep the same
    aspect ratio, a 5.25" wide drive was 8" deep, a 3,5" drive was 5.25"
    deep etc. (bit like the way A2 is twice the area of A3, thence A4 etc)

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Tue Dec 31 21:30:02 2024
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>,
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. That
    happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" floppy,
    which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4t
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to charles on Tue Dec 31 22:25:44 2024
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>,
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. That
    happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" floppy,
    which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere.
    The original and the largest was 8"


    --
    “There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”

    —Soren Kierkegaard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 31 22:22:05 2024
    On 31 Dec 2024 at 15:00:39 GMT, "John Rumm" <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of the old
    spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology from
    the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with spinning platters.

    Yes - SSD has *never* meant the old spinning drives, it has *always* meant solid state.

    --
    "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Wed Jan 1 09:00:02 2025
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy.
    That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25"
    floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common
    use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the largest was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4t
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to charles on Wed Jan 1 09:39:17 2025
    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy.
    That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" >>>>>> floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common
    use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the largest was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
    wrong.

    H.L.Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Jan 1 10:55:14 2025
    On 31 Dec 2024 22:22:05 GMT
    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:

    On 31 Dec 2024 at 15:00:39 GMT, "John Rumm"
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of
    the old spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology
    from the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with
    spinning platters.

    Yes - SSD has *never* meant the old spinning drives, it has *always*
    meant solid state.


    And the early ones were exceptionally slow, slower than a spinning
    drive.

    I have an 8GB one in an Acer Aspire (soldered) and I found the machine
    ran much quicker using an external USB 1.8" drive.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Wed Jan 1 11:00:02 2025
    In article <vl32g5$2nj79$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. >>>>>> That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" >>>>>> floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common >>>> use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the largest
    was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?

    https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/ibm-system-360-12-inch-floppy-disks.1238454/

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4t
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Jan 1 10:52:21 2025
    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:39:17 +0000
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8"
    floppy. That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard
    was the 5.25" floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in
    common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the
    largest was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?


    There were certainly 12" IBM hard discs, they were used in varying
    numbers in cartridges and packs. These would have been single-platter:

    https://collection.motat.nz/records/images/xlarge/35981/d61657b448574f679dfc3c7b59123637ea9e823d.jpg
    https://live.staticflickr.com/6027/5922510369_6fb28b729d_b.jpg

    and they were certainly not floppy. There were various models, the one
    I recall was a single-platter double-sided 2.5MB type. The
    multi-platter packs were top loaded, the kind of thing you see in
    computer rooms in old films.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Jan 1 11:07:52 2025
    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    charles wrote:
    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?

    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the largest
    was 8"

    Wiki has a list of floppy sizes, but nothing larger than 8"

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_floppy_disk_formats>

    True, most of the oddball sizes are smaller, hence newer, hence more
    likely to be remembered, but if larger existed, I'd expect someone from alt.folklore.computers would have added them to the list.

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM
    typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?

    I found people who were probably misremembering, or confusing disk packs
    with floppies

    <https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/ibm-system-360-12-inch-floppy-disks.1238454>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Jan 1 10:24:58 2025
    On 31/12/2024 in message <vl10up$29i7r$1@dont-email.me> John Rumm wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of the old >>spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology from the >various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with spinning platters.


    But in practice questions about speeding up computers always include the
    advice to replace the hard drive with an SSD so its everyday usage is SSD,
    a solid state device in the format of a 2.5" hard drive.

    and NVMe the long strip storage device, if there's a better way please
    let me know!

    The form factor of what you are describing is M.2. M.2 drives are a
    standard width - but available in a number of standard lengths. All M.2 >drives are SSDs. Some have a SATA interface (and the same 6 Gbps speed
    limit of the larger SATA drives). (you can tell which is which - the SATA >version has an extra key in the edge connector which will stop a NVMe
    drive plugging into a SATA only socket)

    NVMe (Non Volatile Memory Express) is a different interface designed for
    easy high speed connectivity with modern PCs. [3]


    Again a search for NVMe returns the long pcb device so it seems to be an accepted way of differing between the two.


    [1] If you have ever wondered about the sizes - in the home computer era
    and into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. That >happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" floppy,
    which was was 3.5" wide. The 3.5" drive was 2.5" wide - you get the
    picture :-)

    [2] Serial AT Attachment (where AT came from the IBM PC era PC "Advanced >Technology" - it was an evolution or what was called ATA (now bacronymed
    to PATA), which moved much of the drive controller intelligence and >electronics onto the drive to save needing complex drive controller cards
    in the computer. This so called "Integrated Drive Electronics" (IDE) drive >made storage more of a commodity item and reduced costs for PC makers.

    [3] As the slower ISA (Industry Standard Architecture) bus of the original
    PC gave way to much faster expansion buses, eventually the PCI (Peripheral >Component Interconnect) bus came to dominate. PCI itself evolved from a >parallel form to a serial form, and now PCI express (PCIe) is common on
    most motherboards. NVMe drives are a good fit for that giving much more >interface throughput.

    Been there with all of that. I'm pretty sure our Display Writers had 8" floppies and I have a brand new 5.25" floppy drive here with a box of
    floppies that goes with my BBC Master. I also remember spending my
    Christmas bonus one year on a 3.5" floppy from Viglen (in West London?)
    and the Watford DFS for the Beeb!

    Did the screechy cassette drive (as used by my Vic 20) come before the floppies?

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF
    if you can read this, you're a nerd 10.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Joe on Wed Jan 1 11:13:19 2025
    On 1 Jan 2025 at 10:52:21 GMT, "Joe" <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:39:17 +0000
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8"
    floppy. That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard
    was the 5.25" floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in
    common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?

    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the
    largest was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM
    typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?

    There were certainly 12" IBM hard discs, they were used in varying
    numbers in cartridges and packs. These would have been single-platter:

    https://collection.motat.nz/records/im ages/xlarge/35981/d61657b448574f679dfc3c7b59123637ea9e823d.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/6027/5922510369_6fb28b729d_b.jpg

    and they were certainly not floppy. There were various models, the one
    I recall was a single-platter double-sided 2.5MB type. The
    multi-platter packs were top loaded, the kind of thing you see in
    computer rooms in old films.

    Were the drive mechanisms made by IBM and licensed to others? I see DEC and HP labels on some of those. Also, you sure it was top loaded (rather than slot-loaded)? From the second image, looks like that wouldn't have been possible (unless the drive slid out on rails)?

    Either way, we learned to remove them all when the DEC engineer turned up.
    They had a habit of using whatever drive was mounted as a test disk to test
    the drive - just wrote all over it. They took umbrage when we tried changing their login (default was User: FIELD, Password: SERVICE). I'm not sure how
    they got on with the VAXes running the accelerator (running cost: $10,000 per hour), however.

    --
    "People don't buy Microsoft for quality, they buy it for compatibility with what Bob in accounting bought last year. Trace it back - they buy Microsoft because the IBM Selectric didn't suck much" - P Seebach, afc

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to charles on Wed Jan 1 11:17:44 2025
    On 1 Jan 2025 at 11:00:02 GMT, "charles" <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

    In article <vl32g5$2nj79$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. >>>>>>>> That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" >>>>>>>> floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common >>>>>> use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the largest
    was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM
    typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?

    https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/ibm-system-360-12-inch-floppy-disks.1238454/

    Just realised it's prolly an RK05, see:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK05

    --
    "I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend.... if you have one." - GB Shaw to Churchill. "Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second... if there is one." - Winston Churchill, in response.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Wed Jan 1 11:17:25 2025
    On 01/01/2025 10:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Did the screechy cassette drive (as used by my Vic 20) come before the floppies?

    No, but reel to reel tape did. In fact it was used as what we would now
    call 'swap' memory.

    When the only RAM was core store, and 1KB was a million quid ±, a tape
    drive was way cheaper and stored more information


    --
    The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before
    its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about.

    Anon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Joe on Wed Jan 1 11:19:51 2025
    On 01/01/2025 10:55, Joe wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 22:22:05 GMT
    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:

    On 31 Dec 2024 at 15:00:39 GMT, "John Rumm"
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of
    the old spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology
    from the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with
    spinning platters.

    Yes - SSD has *never* meant the old spinning drives, it has *always*
    meant solid state.


    And the early ones were exceptionally slow, slower than a spinning
    drive.

    I have an 8GB one in an Acer Aspire (soldered) and I found the machine
    ran much quicker using an external USB 1.8" drive.

    Earliest SSD was core store...if you count ferromagnetism as solid state :-)


    --
    "Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social
    conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the
    windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.) "

    Alan Sokal

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Joe on Wed Jan 1 11:18:47 2025
    On 01/01/2025 10:52, Joe wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:39:17 +0000
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8"
    floppy. That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard
    was the 5.25" floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in
    common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the
    largest was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM
    typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?


    There were certainly 12" IBM hard discs, they were used in varying
    numbers in cartridges and packs. These would have been single-platter:

    https://collection.motat.nz/records/images/xlarge/35981/d61657b448574f679dfc3c7b59123637ea9e823d.jpg
    https://live.staticflickr.com/6027/5922510369_6fb28b729d_b.jpg

    and they were certainly not floppy. There were various models, the one
    I recall was a single-platter double-sided 2.5MB type. The
    multi-platter packs were top loaded, the kind of thing you see in
    computer rooms in old films.

    https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/ibm-system-360-12-inch-floppy-disks.1238454/

    Suggests that the myth of 12" floppies is just that - a myth, but there
    may well have been 12" removable *hard* disk packs.



    --
    "Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social
    conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the
    windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.) "

    Alan Sokal

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to charles on Wed Jan 1 11:20:58 2025
    On 01/01/2025 11:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl32g5$2nj79$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. >>>>>>>> That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" >>>>>>>> floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common >>>>>> use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the largest
    was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM
    typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?

    https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/ibm-system-360-12-inch-floppy-disks.1238454/

    Yup. Links that prove people think they existed, but no proof that they did.

    --
    For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the
    very definition of slavery.

    Jonathan Swift

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to charles on Wed Jan 1 12:20:37 2025
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>,
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8" floppy. That
    happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard was the 5.25" floppy,
    which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?

    In the days of removable disc packs, there were ones of that size and
    larger - but they were more akin to hard drive platters than floppy drives.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Jan 1 12:28:30 2025
    On 31/12/2024 22:22, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 at 15:00:39 GMT, "John Rumm" <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of the old
    spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology from
    the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with spinning
    platters.

    Yes - SSD has *never* meant the old spinning drives, it has *always* meant solid state.

    Although for added confusion there were SSHDs for a while. These were
    hybrid drives which were basically conventional HDDs with a small
    (typically 8GB) embedded SSD in the controller. The logic being that the
    drive self optimised and used the SSD part as a persistent cache to hold
    the most frequently used files from the HDD to give performance for
    access to things like OS files and libraries and often used apps,
    without the expense of needing a whole drives worth of flash memory.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Wed Jan 1 12:45:44 2025
    Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:

    Did the screechy cassette drive (as used by my Vic 20) come before the floppies?

    No I don't think it did (I had a Commodore 64 back in the 1980s). I
    think there were 8" floppies and such in use in 'professional'
    computers before then. The cassette drive was an 'as cheap as
    possible' storage medium for the early home computers.

    Thinking about it didn't the original Apple II have floppies and that
    was before the VIC-20 and C-64?

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Wed Jan 1 12:47:46 2025
    On 01/01/2025 10:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 in message <vl10up$29i7r$1@dont-email.me> John Rumm wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of the
    old spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology from
    the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with spinning
    platters.


    But in practice questions about speeding up computers always include the advice to replace the hard drive with an SSD so its everyday usage is
    SSD, a solid state device in the format of a 2.5" hard drive.

    True, but again that is confusing the form factor (2.5" mechanism) with
    the drive technology. The actual shape of the enclosure is not what
    makes it a SSD. Granted there have been fewer iterations of shape for
    SSDs with 2.5" and M.2 being the most common. (there are also some PCI
    card mounted form factors)


    and NVMe the long strip storage device, if  there's a better way
    please let me know!

    The form factor of what you are describing is M.2. M.2 drives are a
    standard width - but available in a number of standard lengths. All
    M.2 drives are SSDs. Some have a SATA interface (and the same 6 Gbps
    speed limit of the larger SATA drives). (you can tell which is which -
    the SATA version has an extra key in the edge connector which will
    stop a NVMe drive plugging into a SATA only socket)

    NVMe (Non Volatile Memory Express) is a different interface designed
    for easy high speed connectivity with modern PCs. [3]

    Again a search for NVMe returns the long pcb device so it seems to be an accepted way of differing between the two.

    NVMe drives are never in the 2.5" form factor, the physical interfaces
    would not be compatible.

    NVMe however can be in form factors other than M.2 (just check out any
    recent Apple product with the NAND flash chips soldered directly to the
    mobo.

    [3] As the slower ISA (Industry Standard Architecture) bus of the
    original PC gave way to much faster expansion buses, eventually the
    PCI (Peripheral Component Interconnect) bus came to dominate. PCI
    itself evolved from a parallel form to a serial form, and now PCI
    express (PCIe) is common on most motherboards. NVMe drives are a good
    fit for that giving much more interface throughput.

    Been there with all of that. I'm pretty sure our Display Writers had 8" floppies and I have a brand new 5.25" floppy drive here with a box of floppies that goes with my BBC Master. I also remember spending my
    Christmas bonus one year on a 3.5" floppy from Viglen (in West London?)
    and the Watford DFS for the Beeb!

    Yup, I remember investing and arm and half a leg in a 1541 floppy for my
    VIC-20 - cost me about what I paid for the computer!

    Did the screechy cassette drive (as used by my Vic 20) come before the floppies?

    The commodore C2N datasette first showed up built into the early 2000
    series PETs with the "chiclet" keyboards. :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_PET#/media/File:Commodore_2001_Series-IMG_0448b.jpg

    They included a IEEE-488 (aka GPIB, HPIB etc) expansion bus from the
    start, but I don't think the early dual floppy drives like the 204 were available at launch.

    (I would not call the cassette drive "screechy " though it had no
    speaker, so you could not listen to the audio representation of the data
    track)



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed Jan 1 13:32:43 2025
    On 01/01/2025 13:27, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    NVMe however can be in form factors other than M.2 (just check out any
    recent Apple product with the NAND flash chips soldered directly to
    the mobo.

    The newest M4 Mac Minis have proprietary plug-in cards that look similar
    to M.2 but with only flash chips as the controller is on the
    motherboard, so they're SSD rather than NVMe ... some brave souls are upgrading the chips on them by hot air rework.

    Hot air reworking and a microscope is becoming /de rigeur/ in electronics...

    --
    The higher up the mountainside
    The greener grows the grass.
    The higher up the monkey climbs
    The more he shows his arse.

    Traditional

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Jan 1 14:14:40 2025
    On 01/01/2025 in message <vl3dhi$2p7nl$3@dont-email.me> John Rumm wrote:

    On 01/01/2025 10:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 in message <vl10up$29i7r$1@dont-email.me> John Rumm wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of the old >>>>spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used >>>(flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology from >>>the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with spinning >>>platters.


    But in practice questions about speeding up computers always include the >>advice to replace the hard drive with an SSD so its everyday usage is
    SSD, a solid state device in the format of a 2.5" hard drive.

    True, but again that is confusing the form factor (2.5" mechanism) with
    the drive technology. The actual shape of the enclosure is not what makes
    it a SSD. Granted there have been fewer iterations of shape for SSDs with >2.5" and M.2 being the most common. (there are also some PCI card mounted >form factors)

    OK, I was asking about form factor.


    and NVMe the long strip storage device, if  there's a better way please >>>>let me know!

    The form factor of what you are describing is M.2. M.2 drives are a >>>standard width - but available in a number of standard lengths. All M.2 >>>drives are SSDs. Some have a SATA interface (and the same 6 Gbps speed >>>limit of the larger SATA drives). (you can tell which is which - the SATA >>>version has an extra key in the edge connector which will stop a NVMe >>>drive plugging into a SATA only socket)

    NVMe (Non Volatile Memory Express) is a different interface designed for >>>easy high speed connectivity with modern PCs. [3]

    Again a search for NVMe returns the long pcb device so it seems to be an >>accepted way of differing between the two.

    NVMe drives are never in the 2.5" form factor, the physical interfaces
    would not be compatible.

    No (or "not so far") they are long PCB devices!

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Though no-one can go back and make a new start, everyone can start from
    now and make a new ending.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Jan 1 13:27:01 2025
    John Rumm wrote:

    NVMe however can be in form factors other than M.2 (just check out any
    recent Apple product with the NAND flash chips soldered directly to the
    mobo.

    The newest M4 Mac Minis have proprietary plug-in cards that look similar
    to M.2 but with only flash chips as the controller is on the
    motherboard, so they're SSD rather than NVMe ... some brave souls are
    upgrading the chips on them by hot air rework.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Wed Jan 1 14:28:08 2025
    On 1 Jan 2025 at 12:45:44 GMT, "Chris Green" <cl@isbd.net> wrote:

    Thinking about it didn't the original Apple II have floppies and that
    was before the VIC-20 and C-64?

    Only as an extra-cost add-on. I used a casette tape unit on my Apple ][
    (1977).
    --
    "People don't buy Microsoft for quality, they buy it for compatibility with what Bob in accounting bought last year. Trace it back - they buy Microsoft because the IBM Selectric didn't suck much" - P Seebach, afc

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Jan 1 14:45:39 2025
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    NVMe drives are never in the 2.5" form factor, the physical interfaces
    would not be compatible.

    Cough:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.2

    That's the same 2.5" form factor as a SATA SSD, but with a PCIe interface
    that uses the NVMe protocol. The connector is different, as you'd expect.

    There is also:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATA_Express
    which is an addon to SATA that carries PCIe, and thus allows drives to speak NVMe but be backward compatible with SATA. It's not very well used.

    NVMe however can be in form factors other than M.2 (just check out any
    recent Apple product with the NAND flash chips soldered directly to the
    mobo.

    Those aren't NVMe, on most Apple Silicon Macs they are raw flash that talks directly to the SoC. There are some older (~2018) Intel Macbooks that use single chip NVMes, and iPhones >5S also use them. Some 2016-17 have a removable proprietary SSD card that speaks NVMe (and is thus upgradeable), while pre-2016 the proprietary sticks are AHCI SSDs.

    Then there's
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SD_card#SD_Express
    which is NVMe to SD cards (via PCIe), and: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFexpress
    NVMe to CompactFlash cards (also via PCIe).

    Finally there's NVMe over Fabrics, using ethernet or Infiniband, including
    over the internet if you're suitably crazy: https://www.snia.org/education/what-is-nvme-of

    NVMe is a protocol... you can run it over anything. And people do.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Jan 1 19:03:44 2025
    On 1 Jan 2025 11:13:19 GMT
    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:

    On 1 Jan 2025 at 10:52:21 GMT, "Joe" <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:39:17 +0000
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8"
    floppy. That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard >>>>>>>> was the 5.25" floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions
    ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in
    common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?

    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the
    largest was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved
    IBM typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking
    about.
    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?

    There were certainly 12" IBM hard discs, they were used in varying
    numbers in cartridges and packs. These would have been
    single-platter:

    https://collection.motat.nz/records/im ages/xlarge/35981/d61657b448574f679dfc3c7b59123637ea9e823d.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/6027/5922510369_6fb28b729d_b.jpg

    and they were certainly not floppy. There were various models, the
    one I recall was a single-platter double-sided 2.5MB type. The multi-platter packs were top loaded, the kind of thing you see in
    computer rooms in old films.

    Were the drive mechanisms made by IBM and licensed to others? I see
    DEC and HP labels on some of those. Also, you sure it was top loaded
    (rather than slot-loaded)? From the second image, looks like that
    wouldn't have been possible (unless the drive slid out on rails)?

    No, these were all single-platter in cartridges that were front
    loading, with a long flap lifted at the rear for head access. It was
    the multi-platter packs, with a carrying handle on top, which used
    top-loading drives. The drives I used looked like the one in the second picture, I can't remember who made them. The cartridges were yellow,
    again I can't remember who made them, but there were several
    manufacturers. The drive controller was a 15" square PCB that could
    operate two daisy-chained drives, and talked to a Data General Nova CPU
    board.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Wed Jan 1 23:57:53 2025
    On 01/01/2025 12:45, Chris Green wrote:
    Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:

    Did the screechy cassette drive (as used by my Vic 20) come before the
    floppies?

    No I don't think it did (I had a Commodore 64 back in the 1980s). I
    think there were 8" floppies and such in use in 'professional'
    computers before then. The cassette drive was an 'as cheap as
    possible' storage medium for the early home computers.

    Thinking about it didn't the original Apple II have floppies and that
    was before the VIC-20 and C-64?

    Yup PET, Apple II and TRS-80 all had floppy options, and they all
    preceded the VIC. If you are talking about the VIC specifically then
    tape was the norm for most users, but floppy was an option from fairly
    soon after release.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed Jan 1 23:53:45 2025
    On 01/01/2025 14:45, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    NVMe drives are never in the 2.5" form factor, the physical interfaces
    would not be compatible.

    Cough:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.2

    That's the same 2.5" form factor as a SATA SSD, but with a PCIe interface that uses the NVMe protocol. The connector is different, as you'd expect.

    There is also:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATA_Express
    which is an addon to SATA that carries PCIe, and thus allows drives to speak NVMe but be backward compatible with SATA. It's not very well used.

    NVMe however can be in form factors other than M.2 (just check out any
    recent Apple product with the NAND flash chips soldered directly to the
    mobo.

    Those aren't NVMe, on most Apple Silicon Macs they are raw flash that talks directly to the SoC. There are some older (~2018) Intel Macbooks that use single chip NVMes, and iPhones >5S also use them. Some 2016-17 have a removable proprietary SSD card that speaks NVMe (and is thus upgradeable), while pre-2016 the proprietary sticks are AHCI SSDs.

    Then there's
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SD_card#SD_Express
    which is NVMe to SD cards (via PCIe), and: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFexpress
    NVMe to CompactFlash cards (also via PCIe).

    Finally there's NVMe over Fabrics, using ethernet or Infiniband, including over the internet if you're suitably crazy: https://www.snia.org/education/what-is-nvme-of

    NVMe is a protocol... you can run it over anything. And people do.

    Over TCP/IP is also becoming significant (for data centres rather than
    internet as such)

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Harry Bloomfield Esq@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Thu Jan 2 13:47:57 2025
    On 01/01/2025 12:45, Chris Green wrote:
    No I don't think it did (I had a Commodore 64 back in the 1980s). I
    think there were 8" floppies and such in use in 'professional'
    computers before then. The cassette drive was an 'as cheap as
    possible' storage medium for the early home computers.

    Floppies of any type, back then, were a very expensive option, so most
    made do with a cheap cassette tape system. One brief cheaper option to cassettes, was the 'Floopy' - a contiuous 1/8 inch tape loop, in a tiny cartridge. designed for data, it would read, and write, at several times
    the speed of cassette tapes. It had a catalogue at the start, and would
    auto- fast forward, to the data needed. The interface was an S100. I
    designed a way to adapt from S100, to my system,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Harry Bloomfield Esq on Thu Jan 2 16:34:54 2025
    On 02/01/2025 13:47, Harry Bloomfield Esq wrote:
    On 01/01/2025 12:45, Chris Green wrote:
    No I don't think it did (I had a Commodore 64 back in the 1980s).  I
    think there were 8" floppies and such in use in 'professional'
    computers before then.  The cassette drive was an 'as cheap as
    possible' storage medium for the early home computers.

    Floppies of any type, back then, were a very expensive option, so most
    made do with a cheap cassette tape system. One brief cheaper option to cassettes, was the 'Floopy' - a contiuous 1/8 inch tape loop, in a tiny cartridge. designed for data, it would read, and write, at several times
    the speed of cassette tapes. It had a catalogue at the start, and would
    auto- fast forward, to the data needed. The interface was an S100. I
    designed a way to adapt from S100, to my system,


    Not forgetting the Sinclair microdrive, a similar concept executed
    cheaply :-)

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Thu Jan 2 18:03:12 2025
    On 02/01/2025 16:34, John Rumm wrote:
    On 02/01/2025 13:47, Harry Bloomfield Esq wrote:
    On 01/01/2025 12:45, Chris Green wrote:
    No I don't think it did (I had a Commodore 64 back in the 1980s).  I
    think there were 8" floppies and such in use in 'professional'
    computers before then.  The cassette drive was an 'as cheap as
    possible' storage medium for the early home computers.

    Floppies of any type, back then, were a very expensive option, so most
    made do with a cheap cassette tape system. One brief cheaper option to
    cassettes, was the 'Floopy' - a contiuous 1/8 inch tape loop, in a
    tiny cartridge. designed for data, it would read, and write, at
    several times the speed of cassette tapes. It had a catalogue at the
    start, and would auto- fast forward, to the data needed. The interface
    was an S100. I designed a way to adapt from S100, to my system,


    Not forgetting the Sinclair microdrive, a similar concept executed
    cheaply :-)

    and OKish on the QL, until I could save up enough for dual 3-1/2
    floppies and the interface card.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Joe on Thu Jan 2 20:51:27 2025
    On 01/01/2025 10:52, Joe wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:39:17 +0000
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2025 09:00, charles wrote:
    In article <vl1r18$2e26g$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 21:30, charles wrote:
    In article <vl193e$2b0r1$1@dont-email.me>, John Rumm
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 31/12/2024 15:33, Andy Burns wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    into the PC era the first standard drive size was the 8"
    floppy. That happened to be 5.25" wide. So the next standard
    was the 5.25" floppy, which was was 3.5" wide.

    Eh!?

    We had proper 100% sized floppies, not 66% shrunk versions ...

    I was not aware there was a floppy standard larger than 8" in
    common use?

    Our office used ones larger than that - 10" ?


    I can find no record of such anywhere. The original and the
    largest was 8"

    I've found reference to IBM 12" floppies. Since our kit involved IBM
    typesetting, I suspect these are the ones I was thinking about.

    I didnt find any evidence of that. Links?


    There were certainly 12" IBM hard discs, they were used in varying
    numbers in cartridges and packs. These would have been single-platter:

    https://collection.motat.nz/records/images/xlarge/35981/d61657b448574f679dfc3c7b59123637ea9e823d.jpg
    https://live.staticflickr.com/6027/5922510369_6fb28b729d_b.jpg

    and they were certainly not floppy. There were various models, the one
    I recall was a single-platter double-sided 2.5MB type. The
    multi-platter packs were top loaded, the kind of thing you see in
    computer rooms in old films.


    I am pretty sure that in the 1970's DEC PDP 11/34's typically
    came with a disk drive that had one fixed 2.5 mb platter and a
    top loading removable 2.5 mb platter like the RL01

    https://gunkies.org/wiki/RL01/02_disk_drive

    The whole drive unit slid out the front on rails allowing
    the removable platter to be lifted out vertically and
    replaced. The biochemistry lab at St Bartholomews had
    one in 1975 and I'm sure I remember watching the chief
    Biochemist changing theirs

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jan 2 20:55:07 2025
    On 01/01/2025 11:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 01/01/2025 10:55, Joe wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 22:22:05 GMT
    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:

    On 31 Dec 2024 at 15:00:39 GMT, "John Rumm"
    <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    On 29/12/2024 20:20, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I find the naming very confusing, to me SSD is in the format of
    the old spinning laptop drives

    No, SSD = Solid State Disk and refers to the storage technology used
    (flash memory). This is a completely different storage technology
    from the various magnetic Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technologies with
    spinning platters.

    Yes - SSD has *never* meant the old spinning drives, it has *always*
    meant solid state.


    And the early ones were exceptionally slow, slower than a spinning
    drive.

    I have an 8GB one in an Acer Aspire (soldered) and I found the machine
    ran much quicker using an external USB 1.8" drive.

    Earliest SSD was core store...if you count ferromagnetism as solid state
    :-)



    Err, no

    https://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/memory-storage/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Fri Jan 3 18:24:57 2025
    On 01/01/2025 12:45, Chris Green wrote:
    Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:

    Did the screechy cassette drive (as used by my Vic 20) come before the
    floppies?

    No I don't think it did (I had a Commodore 64 back in the 1980s). I
    think there were 8" floppies and such in use in 'professional'
    computers before then. The cassette drive was an 'as cheap as
    possible' storage medium for the early home computers.

    Thinking about it didn't the original Apple II have floppies and that
    was before the VIC-20 and C-64?

    The original IBM PC had a cassette interface. If you started it up
    without a floppy in the drive, it went into "Cassette Basic" IIRC.

    Maybe you could use it without a disk drive at all.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)