• Re: PCIe SATA Card

    From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Jan 3 21:19:58 2025
    XPost: uk.comp.homebuilt

    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    But something is very wrong if things are that slow - perhaps the problem is not the SATA card?

    Yes, definitely, something is very much awry.

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Sat Jan 4 02:13:51 2025
    XPost: uk.comp.homebuilt

    On 03/01/2025 19:17, Theo wrote:
    But something is very wrong if things are that slow
    +1

    Ice o9nly ever used SATA equipped SSDs to replace spinning rust in my
    machines and all have shown way faster access times

    --
    “when things get difficult you just have to lie”

    ― Jean Claud Jüncker

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to wasbit on Mon Jan 6 10:16:46 2025
    XPost: uk.comp.homebuilt

    On 06/01/2025 09:57, wasbit wrote:

    You fit a fan and use small cable ties, to hold the fan body
    snug against the 1" surface of the angle piece. The fan needs
    a three position plug for the wiring and such (some fans
    are purchased without the plug on the end, and you have to
    fit one yourself).

    Snip <


    Nope, never had the need or the thought to do that.
    Most people don't have the tools to do that. DIY, PC wise, is going
    generally out of fashion. They prefer a bought solution.

    Ultimately how much is your time worth?
    I enjoy fixing some things. especially treasured items that can no
    longer be obtained.
    But a perfectly good 8 year old PC can be got for £75...



    --
    In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act.

    - George Orwell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 22 07:41:46 2025
    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.

    I have used standard PCIe SATA Cards, all no-name because I can't find one
    with a name I recognise. The issue I have with these is that sometimes on booting they seem to get over-looked so the devices attached can't be used.

    I did try a StarTech.com 8 Port SATA PCIe Card which was a disaster,
    somebody in here did explain that technically it was a piece of "won't
    work".

    I then went for the LSI SAS 9207-8i KIT 8-Port 6Gbps SATA+SAS card and, frankly, it was no better than the StarTech card and also desperately slow.

    All the standard PCIe SATA Cards seem to only need the smallest PCIe
    connectors to work, I have a couple of 8 or 16 lane slots available but no
    card seems to need them.

    Any suggestions for a decent simple card with, say, 4 internal sockets on
    board that is quick enough to be recognised reliably on boot?

    Many thanks.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    When you think there's no hope left remember the lobsters in the tank in
    the Titanic's restaurant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David Wade on Sun Jun 22 10:04:11 2025
    David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 08:41, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.

    I have used standard PCIe SATA Cards, all no-name because I can't find
    one with a name I recognise. The issue I have with these is that
    sometimes on booting they seem to get over-looked so the devices
    attached can't be used.

    I did try a StarTech.com 8 Port SATA PCIe Card which was a disaster, somebody in here did explain that technically it was a piece of "won't work".

    I then went for the LSI SAS 9207-8i KIT 8-Port 6Gbps SATA+SAS card and, frankly, it was no better than the StarTech card and also desperately slow.

    I am a bit suprised. Normally LSI stuff works. Perhaps an issue with the motherboard?

    I think something else is going wrong - if the card has been swapped and there's still a problem it may point to something else.

    But it could just be Windows being weird. Windows is. The disc array market
    is heavily slanted towards Linux because that's what most servers are running.

    In particular booting off such a card is a whole other question. I suggest booting off a drive hung off a native port and then the JBOD can come up in
    its own time, once drivers are loaded from the primary drive.

    I was going to suggest one of the server cards from HP/Dell/Lenovo but I can't figure out hoe to cable them. They seem to use proprietory cables..

    They're usually SFF cables of some kind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_Attached_SCSI#Connectors

    Check ebay for supplies, they're often available cheaper used.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 09:35:37 2025
    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.

    I have used standard PCIe SATA Cards, all no-name because I can't find
    one with a name I recognise.

    The last time I used a SATA add-on card was a Supermicro SAT2-MV8, which
    is 64bit PCI-X rather than PCIe, I had to replace the motherboard in
    that machine but could no longer find a "workstation class" motherboard
    with even a single PCI-X slot, so had to stop using it.

    The issue I have with these is that
    sometimes on booting they seem to get over-looked so the devices
    attached can't be used.

    I did try a StarTech.com 8 Port SATA PCIe Card which was a disaster,
    somebody in here did explain that technically it was a piece of "won't
    work".

    Generally, I find startech products very good ...

    I then went for the LSI SAS 9207-8i KIT 8-Port 6Gbps SATA+SAS card and, frankly, it was no better than the StarTech card and also desperately slow.

    Again, I generally find LSI RAID cards good in Dell and Fujitsu machines.

    All the standard PCIe SATA Cards seem to only need the smallest PCIe connectors to work, I have a couple of 8 or 16 lane slots available but
    no card seems to need them.

    Presumably you are aware that a PCIe X1 card can be used in X4/X8/X16 slots?

    Any suggestions for a decent simple card with, say, 4 internal sockets
    on board that is quick enough to be recognised reliably on boot?
    Unfortunately it looks like most (all?) Supermicro HBA or IT-Mode cards
    are only supported in their own motherboards ...

    <https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/storage/cards>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 09:42:04 2025
    On 22/06/2025 08:41, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.

    I have used standard PCIe SATA Cards, all no-name because I can't find
    one with a name I recognise. The issue I have with these is that
    sometimes on booting they seem to get over-looked so the devices
    attached can't be used.

    I did try a StarTech.com 8 Port SATA PCIe Card which was a disaster,
    somebody in here did explain that technically it was a piece of "won't
    work".

    I then went for the LSI SAS 9207-8i KIT 8-Port 6Gbps SATA+SAS card and, frankly, it was no better than the StarTech card and also desperately slow.

    I am a bit suprised. Normally LSI stuff works. Perhaps an issue with the motherboard?


    All the standard PCIe SATA Cards seem to only need the smallest PCIe connectors to work, I have a couple of 8 or 16 lane slots available but
    no card seems to need them.



    SCAN have some available with 8 or 16x slots, but the price isn't cheap. Perhaps give them a ring.

    https://www.scan.co.uk/shop/computer-hardware/hdd-ssd-controllers/hba-host-bus-adapters


    Any suggestions for a decent simple card with, say, 4 internal sockets
    on board that is quick enough to be recognised reliably on boot?


    I was going to suggest one of the server cards from HP/Dell/Lenovo but I
    can't figure out hoe to cable them. They seem to use proprietory cables..


    Many thanks.


    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Gaines on Sun Jun 22 13:08:16 2025
    On 22/06/2025 in message <xn0p7cfn9f9c7bm029@news.individual.net> Jeff
    Gaines wrote:

    Any suggestions for a decent simple card with, say, 4 internal sockets on >board that is quick enough to be recognised reliably on boot?

    Thanks for the responses :-)

    The card has an Asmedia 1166 chip and, according to reviews, although it
    is the most popular chip for these cards it is prone to dropping drives on re-boot apparently.

    Somebody here did tell me why the Startech 8 port card was bad, technical treatise I should have kept.

    The LSI cards are prone to over heat in home PCs.

    I've probably got about the best of what's available and will have to live
    with it.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    640k ought to be enough for anyone.
    (Bill Gates, 1981)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Johnson@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 22 15:10:32 2025
    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be
    disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than
    the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Peter Johnson on Sun Jun 22 15:32:37 2025
    Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> wrote:
    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than
    the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    In my case, this *is* the ethernet connected NAS we're talking about. It
    just happens to have a regular PC motherboard rather than be a proprietary
    box, and a decent CPU not a pathetic embedded thing.

    (currently sketching out a new build, but can't de-conflict all the requirements to find products that actually exist)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Peter Johnson on Sun Jun 22 14:38:46 2025
    On 22/06/2025 in message <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com>
    Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be >disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than
    the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the house and backups/archives.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to get along without it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Theo on Sun Jun 22 14:39:57 2025
    On 22/06/2025 in message <Lsg*buGfA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> Theo wrote:

    Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> wrote:
    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be >>disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than
    the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    In my case, this is the ethernet connected NAS we're talking about. It
    just happens to have a regular PC motherboard rather than be a proprietary >box, and a decent CPU not a pathetic embedded thing.

    (currently sketching out a new build, but can't de-conflict all the >requirements to find products that actually exist)

    Theo

    If you find a motherboard with a few dozen SATA sockets let me know and
    I'll try and summon the energy for a new build :-)

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to get along without it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 15:57:58 2025
    On 22/06/2025 15:38, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com>
    Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be
    disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than
    the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the house and backups/archives.

    I have one of those, but it only has three disks

    OS, primary data and backup

    --
    Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the
    gospel of envy.

    Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 16:06:09 2025
    Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <Lsg*buGfA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> Theo wrote:

    Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> wrote:
    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be >>disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than >>the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    In my case, this is the ethernet connected NAS we're talking about. It >just happens to have a regular PC motherboard rather than be a proprietary >box, and a decent CPU not a pathetic embedded thing.

    (currently sketching out a new build, but can't de-conflict all the >requirements to find products that actually exist)

    Theo

    If you find a motherboard with a few dozen SATA sockets let me know and
    I'll try and summon the energy for a new build :-)

    13: https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/product/FhPzK8/gigabyte-mw50-sv0-atx-lga2011-3-motherboard-mw50-sv0

    12:
    https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/products/motherboard/#K=12&xcx=0

    All pretty old sockets though.

    10:
    https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/products/motherboard/#xcx=0&K=10
    has a few slightly, but only slightly, newer.

    I'm afraid SATA is dying :-(

    Servers may have more slots, but they're likely using a HBA (integrated or separate). I think that's going to be the way to go in future - if you need more SATA you need an add-in card.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 15:26:26 2025
    On 22 Jun 2025 at 15:38:46 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 in message <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com>
    Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be
    disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than
    the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the house and backups/archives.

    I have the same setup. Once I'd used up the 2 internal SATA ports I just
    tether USB drives to the server (in this case a 2012 Mac Mini).

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Sun Jun 22 16:59:30 2025
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    ut only slightly, newer.

    I'm afraid SATA is dying 🙁

    Servers may have more slots, but they're likely using a HBA (integrated or separate). I think that's going to be the way to go in future

    I think servers are verging on switching-over to E3.s form factor for
    NVMe drives ... you can fit 32 of them on a 2U server

    Yeah, most compute servers have long gone over to flash, which is NVMe and
    so PCIe based - need chunky PCIe switches but no host controller as such.

    It's only for the bulky but not time critical data that HDD is still
    relevant, and that's a diminishing role. So SATA and SAS are becoming increasingly niche.

    Modern desktop SoCs and chipsets have lanes which can convert between SATA,
    USB and PCIe, but usually it's the USB or PCIe that manufacturers tend to prioritise as that's what their customers mostly want nowadays.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Theo on Sun Jun 22 16:39:21 2025
    Theo wrote:

    ut only slightly, newer.

    I'm afraid SATA is dying 🙁

    Servers may have more slots, but they're likely using a HBA (integrated or separate). I think that's going to be the way to go in future

    I think servers are verging on switching-over to E3.s form factor for
    NVMe drives ... you can fit 32 of them on a 2U server

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Philosopher on Sun Jun 22 18:03:35 2025
    On 22/06/2025 in message <10395lm$jad4$2@dont-email.me> The Natural
    Philosopher wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 15:38, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com>
    Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be >>>disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than >>>the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the house and >>backups/archives.

    I have one of those, but it only has three disks

    OS, primary data and backup

    Why have three disks when an NVMe, 8 internal drives and a four drive DAS
    are available.

    I didn't have a Meccano set when I was young, my parents couldn't afford
    one :-)

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Though no-one can go back and make a new start, everyone can start from
    now and make a new ending.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SH@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 19:47:44 2025
    On 22/06/2025 19:03, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <10395lm$jad4$2@dont-email.me> The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 15:38, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com>
    Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be
    disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than >>>> the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the house
    and backups/archives.

    I have one of those, but it only has three disks

    OS, primary data and backup

    Why have three disks when an NVMe, 8 internal drives and a four drive
    DAS are available.

    I didn't have a Meccano set when I was young, my parents couldn't afford
    one :-)



    How about one of these? You can put up to 4 x NVME M2 drives on one card
    and put it in a PCIe x16 slot?

    Note! The Mobo Bios MUST support 4x4 bifurcation which essentially turns
    that x16 slot into 4 off x4 PCIe virtual slots so each NVME Drive has
    its own dedicated x4 PCIe slot.

    I have a mobo that has 6 off x16 PCIe slots with onboard video so I
    could in theory have up to 24 NVME M2 drives.... is that enough NVME M2
    ports for you? :-)

    I know the blurb says it requires specific mohterboards but thats for
    RoC as in Raid on a Chip, not strictly speaking necessary as these
    drives are viewable under Disk manager in WIn 11.

    Ditto in Linux and you could use software MADM to give you software
    based RAID if that is important to you.

    I am seeing that the price of NVME drives is now approaching the pricing
    of their equal sized SATA equivalents....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to 1039j4h$m7bl$1@dont-email.me on Sun Jun 22 20:23:00 2025
    On 22/06/2025 in message <1039j4h$m7bl$1@dont-email.me> SH wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 19:03, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <10395lm$jad4$2@dont-email.me> The Natural >>Philosopher wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 15:38, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com> >>>>Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> >>>>>wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in >>>>>the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used >>>>>DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be >>>>>disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than >>>>>the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected >>>>>NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the house and >>>>backups/archives.

    I have one of those, but it only has three disks

    OS, primary data and backup

    Why have three disks when an NVMe, 8 internal drives and a four drive DAS >>are available.

    I didn't have a Meccano set when I was young, my parents couldn't afford >>one :-)



    How about one of these? You can put up to 4 x NVME M2 drives on one card
    and put it in a PCIe x16 slot?

    Note! The Mobo Bios MUST support 4x4 bifurcation which essentially turns
    that x16 slot into 4 off x4 PCIe virtual slots so each NVME Drive has its
    own dedicated x4 PCIe slot.

    I have a mobo that has 6 off x16 PCIe slots with onboard video so I could
    in theory have up to 24 NVME M2 drives.... is that enough NVME M2 ports
    for you? :-)

    I know the blurb says it requires specific mohterboards but thats for RoC
    as in Raid on a Chip, not strictly speaking necessary as these drives are >viewable under Disk manager in WIn 11.

    Ditto in Linux and you could use software MADM to give you software based >RAID if that is important to you.

    I am seeing that the price of NVME drives is now approaching the pricing
    of their equal sized SATA equivalents....

    The difficulty is in extracting NVMe cards and running (in the event of a catastrophe), the drives are hot swap, front loading, on a backplane :-)

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    640k ought to be enough for anyone.
    (Bill Gates, 1981)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 16:24:54 2025
    On Sun, 6/22/2025 2:03 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <10395lm$jad4$2@dont-email.me> The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 15:38, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com>  Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in
    the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used
    DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be
    disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds than >>>> the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected
    NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the house and  backups/archives.

    I have one of those, but it only has three disks

    OS, primary data and backup

    Why have three disks when an NVMe, 8 internal drives and a four drive DAS are available.

    I didn't have a Meccano set when I was young, my parents couldn't afford one :-)


    The 88SE1475 might work, but I can so far only find one card with it,
    and it really requires someone at the factory who is good with firmware
    to make it work worth a darn. The card has the ports on the faceplate, and
    the ports are not internal ones. The power consumption is a bit high,
    but that might also depend on whether the XOR engine is running.

    https://www.marvell.com/content/dam/marvell/en/public-collateral/storage/marvell-storage-88se14xx-product-brief-2016-03.pdf

    I could find an 88SE1485 card, but you would need to track
    down a seller with reviewer comments, to see whether it
    works or not. This link, just gives the part number ARC-1330-8i
    as a bread crumb.

    https://www.acmemicro.com/Product/16865/Areca-ARC-1330-8i-8-Port-Internal-PCIe-3-0-12Gb-s-SAS-Host-Adapter---Low-Profile?c_id=85

    That looks to be an x8 card, so would take a video card slot. Not
    many current generation boards split the video slot into x8,x8 for you.
    With the usual x16 + x4 wired slots, you might put the video card in
    the x4, and any fancy card in the x16. Only a Dell refurb, might refuse
    a storage card shoved into the one and only video card slot... (for those people who tell me what a sweet deal dealing with Dell is).

    My old HEDT box has x16,x16 for wiring, but then the lanes aren't
    all that fast. It isn't much when compared to the speeds
    of more modern gear.

    The purpose of me identifying such a card, is a "no-holds-barred" expansion card. If you want to run eight 530MB/sec SATA SSD in a softraid RAID0 at 4GB/sec, you can.
    Whereas the majority of the shitty products, share a single port of
    bandwidth, over multiple ports, like 530MB/sec / 5 on the Startech card.
    The RAID0 of that then, could not go faster than a total of 530MB/sec
    on that group of five ports.

    Lots of projects, don't need this level of performance.
    But considering the state of SATA, it's best to have some nice
    cards for the future. And not have to worry about all the
    "inferior card issues" when planning future projects.

    If the motherboard PCH ports can manage it, an expansion
    card should also be able to do it. The motherboard PCH is
    only limited by the DMI speed (which you should check if
    planning anything fancy, using only motherboard ports).

    CPU ---- video card PCIe Rev5
    |
    | DMI bus
    |
    PCH --/-- 6 SATA
    \
    +---- One-standard-slower Southbridge PCIe lane rates...

    The PCH is "over-subscribed", if you can manage a test case that
    abuses all interfaces at once. But normal usage patterns, the
    PCH/Southbridge isn't too bad. Any whizzy projects, you have to
    plan for the project. For example, if you come up with an aggressive
    enough plan, the motherboard for that is around $1200 and
    the CPU is $10000 :-)

    If SATA is going away, I just don't want to "stock up on inferior cards".
    I am probably only going to have one machine with a lot of hard
    drives, and not my daily driver.

    When the Realtek 10GbE starts shipping, we will have the component
    needed for remote-NAS work (noisy machine some distance away).
    There's a danger that one too, will have a lack of PCIe lanes,
    making it a pig to run flat out (...won't do 10GbE on my old HEDT box).

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 22 23:05:27 2025
    On 6/22/25 21:23, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <1039j4h$m7bl$1@dont-email.me> SH wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 19:03, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message <10395lm$jad4$2@dont-email.me> The Natural
    Philosopher wrote:

    On 22/06/2025 15:38, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 22/06/2025 in message
    <hg2g5k1c0l4189d09lmj23erjphrassa42@4ax.com> Peter Johnson wrote:

    On 22 Jun 2025 07:41:46 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:


    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.


    If you don't mind me asking, why do you need so many SATA devices in >>>>>> the case? The trend is downwards - I have one in mine, a rarely used >>>>>> DVD drive, and although there are four SATA ports two of them will be >>>>>> disabled if one of the M.2 slots is run at PCIe x4 mode.
    I do have, on the mb, 19 USB ports that run at much faster speeds
    than
    the SATA ports. And I offloaded my local data onto ethernet connected >>>>>> NAS devices a few years ago.

    It's my server so contains multimedia for streaming round the
    house  and backups/archives.

    I have one of those, but it only has three disks

    OS, primary data and backup

    Why have three disks when an NVMe, 8 internal drives and a four
    drive  DAS are available.

    I didn't have a Meccano set when I was young, my parents couldn't
    afford one :-)



    How about one of these? You can put up to 4 x NVME M2 drives on one
    card and put it in a PCIe x16 slot?

    Note! The Mobo Bios MUST support 4x4 bifurcation which essentially
    turns that x16 slot into 4 off x4 PCIe virtual slots so each NVME
    Drive has its own dedicated x4 PCIe slot.

    I have a mobo that has 6 off x16 PCIe slots with onboard video so I
    could in theory have up to 24 NVME M2 drives.... is that enough NVME
    M2 ports for you? :-)

    I know the blurb says it requires specific mohterboards but thats for
    RoC as in Raid on a Chip, not strictly speaking necessary as these
    drives are viewable under Disk manager in WIn 11.

    Ditto in Linux and you could use software MADM to give you software
    based RAID if that is important to you.

    I am seeing that the price of NVME drives is now approaching the
    pricing of their equal sized SATA equivalents....

    The difficulty is in extracting NVMe cards and running (in the event of
    a catastrophe), the drives are hot swap, front loading, on a backplane :-)


    I don't really know about this stuff, but rather than hot swap, wouldn't
    it be safer to have multiple backup servers. One goes down switch to the
    other.

    I'm not sure why a home server needs hot swap. Having backup servers in separate enclosures, separate locations, even in the same house, seems
    safer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Mon Jun 23 10:03:27 2025
    On 22/06/2025 08:41, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.

    I have used standard PCIe SATA Cards, all no-name because I can't find
    one with a name I recognise. The issue I have with these is that
    sometimes on booting they seem to get over-looked so the devices
    attached can't be used.

    I did try a StarTech.com 8 Port SATA PCIe Card which was a disaster,
    somebody in here did explain that technically it was a piece of "won't
    work".

    I then went for the LSI SAS 9207-8i KIT 8-Port 6Gbps SATA+SAS card and, frankly, it was no better than the StarTech card and also desperately slow.

    All the standard PCIe SATA Cards seem to only need the smallest PCIe connectors to work, I have a couple of 8 or 16 lane slots available but
    no card seems to need them.

    Any suggestions for a decent simple card with, say, 4 internal sockets
    on board that is quick enough to be recognised reliably on boot?


    I suspect you have a power supply problem. Asking 6 or more devices to
    boot at the same time requires a lot of power.
    IIRC the remedy is to stagger the booting.



    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bernard Peek@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Tue Jun 24 14:39:45 2025
    On 2025-06-22, Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:

    My Asus Z170-K has 6 x SATA sockets on board and I need 9.

    I have used standard PCIe SATA Cards, all no-name because I can't find one with a name I recognise. The issue I have with these is that sometimes on booting they seem to get over-looked so the devices attached can't be used.

    I have an Orico device that is connected by USB 3. It holds five disks. It
    gets recognised at boot time but goes to sleep. A background task that
    accesses it every 10 minutes has fixed that.

    I have a couple of e-SATA boxes that hold four disks each. I have a NAS but
    it has a habit of picking up malware.


    I did try a StarTech.com 8 Port SATA PCIe Card which was a disaster,
    somebody in here did explain that technically it was a piece of "won't
    work".

    I then went for the LSI SAS 9207-8i KIT 8-Port 6Gbps SATA+SAS card and, frankly, it was no better than the StarTech card and also desperately slow.

    SAS disks can be had fairly cheaply so I'm investigating that. I bought a second-hand HP microserver and found that they have both SATA and SAS ports.



    --
    Bernard Peek
    bap@shrdlu.com
    Wigan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)