• OT: Scale of electricity generating payments

    From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 9 10:53:06 2025
    From the Torygraph...


    Households paid the equivalent of £2m an hour to gas-fired power
    stations on Wednesday after low winds and freezing temperatures left electricity grid bosses scrambling to keep the lights on.

    As freezing weather swept into the South East, the National Energy
    System Operator (Neso) warned that it expected power supplies to become particularly tight between 4pm and 7pm.

    The crunch forced grid operators to pay huge sums to gas power plant
    owners to keep them running. The cost will ultimately be borne by
    households and businesses through their bills.

    At one stage, they agreed to pay the Rye House power station, in
    Hertfordshire, the equivalent of £1.8m per hour, transparency data shows.

    Three gas-fired units in Connah’s Quay, North Wales, were also paid a combined £2m per hour.

    Neso declined to comment on the payments.

    It comes as cold weather is expected to spark increased electricity
    consumption as more people stay indoors, watch television and use their
    gas or electric heating.

    At the same time, a sharp drop in wind power and low availability of
    power interconnectors with Europe is also putting more pressure on the grid.

    In response, Neso has issued a warning to electricity generators and
    suppliers that it is looking to bolster supplies.

    There is no suggestion there will be blackouts or that power cuts are “imminent”, a spokesman said.

    But Neso added this morning: “In the short-term, we would like a greater safety cushion between power demand and available supply.” ===================================================

    Gotta lurve those renewables.
    No wonder fossil duel companies love them.

    --
    Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice.
    – Will Durant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jan 9 13:17:36 2025
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    From the Torygraph...


    Households paid the equivalent of £2m an hour to gas-fired power
    stations on Wednesday after low winds and freezing temperatures left electricity grid bosses scrambling to keep the lights on.

    As freezing weather swept into the South East, the National Energy
    System Operator (Neso) warned that it expected power supplies to become particularly tight between 4pm and 7pm.

    The crunch forced grid operators to pay huge sums to gas power plant
    owners to keep them running. The cost will ultimately be borne by
    households and businesses through their bills.

    At one stage, they agreed to pay the Rye House power station, in Hertfordshire, the equivalent of £1.8m per hour, transparency data shows.

    Three gas-fired units in Connah’s Quay, North Wales, were also paid a combined £2m per hour.

    Neso declined to comment on the payments.

    It comes as cold weather is expected to spark increased electricity consumption as more people stay indoors, watch television and use their
    gas or electric heating.

    At the same time, a sharp drop in wind power and low availability of
    power interconnectors with Europe is also putting more pressure on the grid.

    In response, Neso has issued a warning to electricity generators and suppliers that it is looking to bolster supplies.

    There is no suggestion there will be blackouts or that power cuts are “imminent”, a spokesman said.

    But Neso added this morning: “In the short-term, we would like a greater safety cushion between power demand and available supply.” ===================================================

    Gotta lurve those renewables.
    No wonder fossil duel companies love them.

    <greenbollox> So what’s the problem? We just need more wind turbines!<greenbollox>

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Spike on Thu Jan 9 17:11:19 2025
    On 09/01/2025 16:44, Spike wrote:


    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer gets
    the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand (usually burning gas).

    […]


    "This is known as the ‘spot market’. Their share of trades has fallen over time and is thought to be around 30% in 2022 (PDF)."

    In each half-hour trading period, each electricity generator bids the price it will accept to generate electricity, according to how expensive the electricity is to produce.

    The bids are accepted in ‘merit order’ until the demand for electricity is
    met; the cheapest first, and the most expensive last. However, the price of all units of electricity is set according to the bid price of the most expensive unit needed to meet projected demand: this is the ‘marginal cost’.”

    <https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/why-is-cheap-renewable-electricity-so-expensive/>


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jan 9 16:27:21 2025
    On 09/01/2025 10:53, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    From the Torygraph...


    Households paid the equivalent of £2m an hour to gas-fired power
    stations on Wednesday after low winds and freezing temperatures left electricity grid bosses scrambling to keep the lights on.

    As freezing weather swept into the South East, the National Energy
    System Operator (Neso) warned that it expected power supplies to become particularly tight between 4pm and 7pm.

    The crunch forced grid operators to pay huge sums to gas power plant
    owners to keep them running. The cost will ultimately be borne by
    households and businesses through their bills.

    At one stage, they agreed to pay the Rye House power station, in Hertfordshire, the equivalent of £1.8m per hour, transparency data shows.

    Three gas-fired units in Connah’s Quay, North Wales, were also paid a combined £2m per hour.

    Neso declined to comment on the payments.

    It comes as cold weather is expected to spark increased electricity consumption as more people stay indoors, watch television and use their
    gas or electric heating.

    At the same time, a sharp drop in wind power and low availability of
    power interconnectors with Europe is also putting more pressure on the
    grid.

    In response, Neso has issued a warning to electricity generators and suppliers that it is looking to bolster supplies.

    There is no suggestion there will be blackouts or that power cuts are “imminent”, a spokesman said.

    But Neso added this morning: “In the short-term, we would like a greater safety cushion between power demand and available supply.” ===================================================

    Gotta lurve those renewables.
    No wonder fossil duel companies love them.

    It sounds a lot, but spread across the 10s of millions of households in
    the UK, it's not much each.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to SteveW on Thu Jan 9 16:44:26 2025
    SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 10:53, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    From the Torygraph...

    Households paid the equivalent of £2m an hour to gas-fired power
    stations on Wednesday after low winds and freezing temperatures left
    electricity grid bosses scrambling to keep the lights on.

    As freezing weather swept into the South East, the National Energy
    System Operator (Neso) warned that it expected power supplies to become
    particularly tight between 4pm and 7pm.

    The crunch forced grid operators to pay huge sums to gas power plant
    owners to keep them running. The cost will ultimately be borne by
    households and businesses through their bills.

    At one stage, they agreed to pay the Rye House power station, in
    Hertfordshire, the equivalent of £1.8m per hour, transparency data shows.

    Three gas-fired units in Connah’s Quay, North Wales, were also paid a
    combined £2m per hour.

    Neso declined to comment on the payments.

    It comes as cold weather is expected to spark increased electricity
    consumption as more people stay indoors, watch television and use their
    gas or electric heating.

    At the same time, a sharp drop in wind power and low availability of
    power interconnectors with Europe is also putting more pressure on the
    grid.

    In response, Neso has issued a warning to electricity generators and
    suppliers that it is looking to bolster supplies.

    There is no suggestion there will be blackouts or that power cuts are
    “imminent”, a spokesman said.

    But Neso added this morning: “In the short-term, we would like a greater >> safety cushion between power demand and available supply.” >>===================================================

    Gotta lurve those renewables.
    No wonder fossil duel companies love them.

    It sounds a lot, but spread across the 10s of millions of households in
    the UK, it's not much each.

    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer gets
    the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand
    (usually burning gas).

    […]

    In each half-hour trading period, each electricity generator bids the price
    it will accept to generate electricity, according to how expensive the electricity is to produce.

    The bids are accepted in ‘merit order’ until the demand for electricity is met; the cheapest first, and the most expensive last. However, the price of
    all units of electricity is set according to the bid price of the most expensive unit needed to meet projected demand: this is the ‘marginal cost’.”

    <https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/why-is-cheap-renewable-electricity-so-expensive/>

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Jan 9 18:01:32 2025
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 16:44, Spike wrote:

    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer gets
    the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of
    electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand
    (usually burning gas).

    […]

    "This is known as the ‘spot market’. Their share of trades has fallen over
    time and is thought to be around 30% in 2022 (PDF)."

    Was the spot market not being used on the night in question?

    It’s in winter where we have peak demands and the greatest use of the spot market. It might be 30% overall, but that disguises how much it’s used in critical periods, with consequential £benefit to the producers.

    In each half-hour trading period, each electricity generator bids the price >> it will accept to generate electricity, according to how expensive the
    electricity is to produce.

    The bids are accepted in ‘merit order’ until the demand for electricity is
    met; the cheapest first, and the most expensive last. However, the price of >> all units of electricity is set according to the bid price of the most
    expensive unit needed to meet projected demand: this is the ‘marginal
    cost’.”

    <https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/why-is-cheap-renewable-electricity-so-expensive/>





    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to SteveW on Thu Jan 9 18:23:32 2025
    On 09/01/2025 16:27, SteveW wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 10:53, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
     From the Torygraph...


    Households paid the equivalent of £2m an hour to gas-fired power
    stations on Wednesday after low winds and freezing temperatures left
    electricity grid bosses scrambling to keep the lights on.

    As freezing weather swept into the South East, the National Energy
    System Operator (Neso) warned that it expected power supplies to
    become particularly tight between 4pm and 7pm.

    The crunch forced grid operators to pay huge sums to gas power plant
    owners to keep them running. The cost will ultimately be borne by
    households and businesses through their bills.

    At one stage, they agreed to pay the Rye House power station, in
    Hertfordshire, the equivalent of £1.8m per hour, transparency data shows. >>
    Three gas-fired units in Connah’s Quay, North Wales, were also paid a
    combined £2m per hour.

    Neso declined to comment on the payments.

    It comes as cold weather is expected to spark increased electricity
    consumption as more people stay indoors, watch television and use
    their gas or electric heating.

    At the same time, a sharp drop in wind power and low availability of
    power interconnectors with Europe is also putting more pressure on the
    grid.

    In response, Neso has issued a warning to electricity generators and
    suppliers that it is looking to bolster supplies.

    There is no suggestion there will be blackouts or that power cuts are
    “imminent”, a spokesman said.

    But Neso added this morning: “In the short-term, we would like a
    greater safety cushion between power demand and available supply.”
    ===================================================

    Gotta lurve those renewables.
    No wonder fossil duel companies love them.

    It sounds a lot, but spread across the 10s of millions of households in
    the UK, it's not much each.

    Total renewable subsidies are now costing us about £2,3bn a year.
    That's a £100 a year on every household. Plus the cost of running all
    the backup - its probably a tax of about £400 per household altogether.
    That could have gone on the NHS.


    --
    For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the
    very definition of slavery.

    Jonathan Swift

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Jan 9 20:49:25 2025
    On Thu, 1/9/2025 12:11 PM, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 16:44, Spike wrote:


    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer gets
    the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of
    electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand
    (usually burning gas).

    […]


    "This is known as the ‘spot market’. Their share of trades has fallen over time and is thought to be around 30% in 2022 (PDF)."


    And the fact you're building up a bit of battery capacity
    by the year 2030, that will have an impact on how much a
    spot market will be called into play.

    https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/12/17/uk-plans-for-22-gw-battery-storage-fleet-by-2030/

    "short-term flexibility"

    The smallest battery banks, solve high frequency grid stability.

    As the banks become a bit larger, they prevent the provider from
    hitting the spot market so often and taking a raping. That used
    to happen here, where the spot market charged 100x the cost
    of producing the power, for a single extra megawatt. The activity
    that was happening at 8 Am in the morning, was having a measurable
    effect on monthly bills.

    That changed, when our "generating margin" improved. Partially
    it was time of day billing, that stopped the demand at 8AM.
    And it was the 8 AM demand for power which was causing a visit
    to the spot market, each and every day.

    You can trim off those incidents (the inability to forecast
    with the required accuracy), by having the right resources to
    do it.

    The Australians were quite happy with their first battery,
    and they got more applications out of it than they were
    expecting.

    This is market efficiency at work -- recognizing a problem,
    plugging it relatively cheaply.

    This has nothing to do with building a ten day battery.
    If the wind stops blowing, you're still fucked. But in
    a non-exceptional day, a bit of battery bank can cut
    out the extravagance of a visit to the spot market.

    Keeping too much spinning reserve isn't good either.
    You're still paying to do that, if that is your approach
    instead.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Spike on Fri Jan 10 09:45:02 2025
    On 09/01/2025 18:01, Spike wrote:
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 16:44, Spike wrote:

    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer gets >>> the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of
    electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand
    (usually burning gas).

    […]

    "This is known as the ‘spot market’. Their share of trades has fallen over
    time and is thought to be around 30% in 2022 (PDF)."

    Was the spot market not being used on the night in question?

    I assume it was being used. Has someone suggested it was not?

    It’s in winter where we have peak demands and the greatest use of the spot market. It might be 30% overall, but that disguises how much it’s used in critical periods, with consequential £benefit to the producers.

    To some producers, not "every producer".
    Exelon seem to suggest 4Gw from the spot market in recent peaks https://bmrs.elexon.co.uk/market-index-prices

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Fri Jan 10 09:59:51 2025
    On 10/01/2025 09:45, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 18:01, Spike wrote:
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 16:44, Spike wrote:

    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer
    gets
    the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of
    electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand
    (usually burning gas).

    […]

    "This is known as the ‘spot market’. Their share of trades has fallen >>> over
    time and is thought to be around 30% in 2022 (PDF)."

    Was the spot market not being used on the night in question?

     I assume it was being used. Has someone suggested it was not?

    It’s in winter where we have peak demands and the greatest use of the
    spot
    market. It might be 30% overall, but that disguises how much it’s used in >> critical periods, with consequential £benefit to the producers.

     To some producers, not "every producer".
     Exelon seem to suggest 4Gw from the spot market in recent peaks https://bmrs.elexon.co.uk/market-index-prices


    AIUI most electricity is purchased in terms of long term contracts, but
    if those fail to deliver, or demand exceeds contracted amounts the spot
    rate is simply raised until someone responds and says 'I will generate
    (or shed) that much electricity for that price'.

    And by some stupidness of CfDs wind farms get paid the same for that period.


    --
    “There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”

    —Soren Kierkegaard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Jan 10 10:25:52 2025
    On 10/01/2025 09:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 10/01/2025 09:45, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 18:01, Spike wrote:
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 16:44, Spike wrote:

    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer gets >>>>> the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of >>>>> electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand >>>>> (usually burning gas).

    […]

    "This is known as the ‘spot market’. Their share of trades has fallen over
    time and is thought to be around 30% in 2022 (PDF)."

    Was the spot market not being used on the night in question?

      I assume it was being used. Has someone suggested it was not?

    It’s in winter where we have peak demands and the greatest use of the spot
    market. It might be 30% overall, but that disguises how much it’s used in >>> critical periods, with consequential £benefit to the producers.

      To some producers, not "every producer".
      Exelon seem to suggest 4Gw from the spot market in recent peaks
    https://bmrs.elexon.co.uk/market-index-prices


    AIUI most electricity is purchased in terms of long term contracts, but if those fail to deliver, or demand exceeds contracted amounts the spot rate
    is simply raised until someone responds and says 'I will generate (or shed) that much electricity for that price'.

    And by some stupidness of CfDs wind farms get paid the same for that period.

    If they do, the CfD would require them to pay the excess over their
    strike price to the Low Carbon Contracts Company (DESNZ).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Jan 10 11:28:13 2025
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    AIUI most electricity is purchased in terms of long term contracts, but
    if those fail to deliver, or demand exceeds contracted amounts the spot
    rate is simply raised until someone responds and says 'I will generate
    (or shed) that much electricity for that price'.

    And by some stupidness of CfDs wind farms get paid the same for that period.

    I don’t think the term ‘stupidness’ applies; I think it was deliberately set up that way. Al Capone would have recognised it as a racket.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Fri Jan 10 11:25:36 2025
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 18:01, Spike wrote:
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    On 09/01/2025 16:44, Spike wrote:

    The way the electricity racket is set up ensures that every producer gets >>>> the same rate, so they all will have benefitted from this.

    “Insight

    Published Thursday, 14 September, 2023

    Under the ‘marginal cost pricing system’, the wholesale price of
    electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand
    (usually burning gas).

    […]

    "This is known as the ‘spot market’. Their share of trades has fallen over
    time and is thought to be around 30% in 2022 (PDF)."

    Was the spot market not being used on the night in question?

    I assume it was being used. Has someone suggested it was not?

    It’s in winter where we have peak demands and the greatest use of the spot >> market. It might be 30% overall, but that disguises how much it’s used in >> critical periods, with consequential £benefit to the producers.

    To some producers, not "every producer".
    Exelon seem to suggest 4Gw from the spot market in recent peaks https://bmrs.elexon.co.uk/market-index-prices

    That website has only an ‘Accept All’ button for cookies, so I didn’t open
    it any further.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Spike on Fri Jan 10 11:35:25 2025
    On 10/01/2025 11:25, Spike wrote:
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    https://bmrs.elexon.co.uk/market-index-prices

    That website has only an ‘Accept All’ button for cookies, so I didn’t open
    it any further.


    If you click on 'VIEW COOKIES LIST' there is an option to "DECLINE ALL"
    (even if it is impractical to read the list of cookies).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Fri Jan 10 13:50:31 2025
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    On 10/01/2025 11:25, Spike wrote:
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
    https://bmrs.elexon.co.uk/market-index-prices

    That website has only an ‘Accept All’ button for cookies, so I didn’t open
    it any further.


    If you click on 'VIEW COOKIES LIST' there is an option to "DECLINE ALL" (even if it is impractical to read the list of cookies).

    That’s a shonky way of getting people to ‘Accept All’.

    What’s wrong with having a ‘Reject All’ button there as well?

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)