• Re: New TV set

    From Theo@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 11:15:21 2025
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing
    for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're just platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an HDMI
    port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on the iPlayer
    app which may be a dealbreaker. nvidia Shield is probably the next least
    worst streaming box.

    Unfortunately any kind of internet TV is a PITA for geriatric users if they aren't used to navigating on screen menus (ie just expect channels
    1,2,3,...), because everything is an 'app' nowadays.

    The least spying option is to buy a monitor and connect a box via HDMI, but it's hard to find an internet TV box that also takes aerial input.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 10:50:13 2025
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing
    for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    Crikey. Must have a big living room

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    I'm out of that market...don't you need a set top box for recording? And
    is there such a thing as an understandable button set?


    --
    It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house
    for the voice of the kingdom.

    Jonathan Swift

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 10:23:08 2025
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing
    for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Jan 21 11:53:21 2025
    On 1/21/25 11:15, Theo wrote:
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired
    headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing
    for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're just platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an HDMI
    port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on the iPlayer
    app which may be a dealbreaker. nvidia Shield is probably the next least worst streaming box.

    Unfortunately any kind of internet TV is a PITA for geriatric users if they aren't used to navigating on screen menus (ie just expect channels 1,2,3,...), because everything is an 'app' nowadays.

    The least spying option is to buy a monitor and connect a box via HDMI, but it's hard to find an internet TV box that also takes aerial input.


    I think it is easier to use a PC as a TV, easier than it is to use a
    smart TV. You just need to replace the remote with a keyboard and mouse.

    I have a 55 inch TCL and a comfy chair at a viewing distance of 1.8m
    (suitable size/distance for 2K resolution). I use the mouse on my
    (leather) armchair chair arm, and keyboard in my lap.

    I've not watched broadcast TV for many years, but you can handle it by
    using a server on your LAN running something like like TV headend, to
    stream it across the LAN.

    How much you will get a geriatric to adopt, depends on their familiarity
    with PCs, and particularly a suitable/close viewing arrangement.

    I tried this with my Mum, but she was normally much happier on her tablet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Jan 21 11:57:14 2025
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:50:13 +0000
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user?
    Say 50" ish.

    Crikey. Must have a big living room

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    I'm out of that market...don't you need a set top box for recording?

    Our kitchen TV is nearly 15 years old, decidedly un-smart, but can
    allegedly record to a USB drive. We've never actually tried it, but
    there's no reason to believe it won't.

    Our fairly new 43" alleged-smart TV does this, but recording is very
    primitive. Nothing like a Humax.

    And is there such a thing as an understandable button set?

    Many have several dedicated buttons for channels which pay the
    manufacturer.

    I very much doubt that there are any un-smart TVs now available, though
    it is still possible to buy several 720 line 'HD-Ready' sets even
    though 1080i has been broadcast for more than 15 years.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Jan 21 12:13:07 2025
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Davey wrote:

    Amazon Prime just emailed me to say I wasn't using a benefit of
    Prime, ie Apple+ TV.

    I think Apple TV+ is a paid bolt-on to Amazon Prime?

    Apple TV is a box you plug into your TV. It runs apps for streaming
    services like Netflix, iPlayer, ITVx etc.

    Apple TV+ is a streaming service, a competitor to Netflix. They make their
    own programmes.

    Apple's naming is terrible.

    (I suppose at least it's not Apple TV Pro Max Ultra)


    If you want to watch programmes from Apple TV+ you don't need any Apple hardware (Apple TV, Mac, iPhone, etc) - you can watch it on Android, PC,
    many brands of smart TVs. You can subscribe, you can often get a few months free if you buy Apple products, and it sounds like Amazon give you some
    freebie access too.

    The subtitles issue is a problem with the iPlayer app on the Apple TV
    hardware - a disagreement between the BBC and Apple as to the format the subtitles should be sent in.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Jan 21 11:23:12 2025
    On 21/01/2025 10:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    Crikey. Must have a big living room

    Biggish. The house is a chalet bungalow with dormer windows. Perhaps 8m
    but the staircase access made a bedroom split awkward so we use it as a
    TV lounge. I watch different programs and have a smaller set in my office.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    I'm out of that market...don't you need a set top box for recording? And
    is there such a thing as an understandable button set?

    I use a BT set top box. The boss uses a Humax. Issues arise after the Grandchildren have reset stuff on the main box....



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Jan 21 11:20:05 2025
    On 21 Jan 2025 11:15:21 +0000 (GMT)
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user?
    Say 50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're
    just platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an
    HDMI port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on
    the iPlayer app which may be a dealbreaker.

    And Amazon Prime just emailed me to say I wasn't using a benefit of
    Prime, ie Apple+ TV. No subtitles, no interest, Bye.

    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Davey on Tue Jan 21 11:50:09 2025
    Davey wrote:

    Amazon Prime just emailed me to say I wasn't using a benefit of
    Prime, ie Apple+ TV.

    I think Apple TV+ is a paid bolt-on to Amazon Prime?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From codger@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 12:26:59 2025
    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?

    Has she actually asked for one ?

    Of will it just make your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her ?


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?


    codger

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to codger on Tue Jan 21 12:42:39 2025
    codger <codger@anon.com> wrote:

    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?

    Has she actually asked for one ?

    Of will it just make your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her ?


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?

    +1. What is actually deficient with the current set?

    TVs have got higher resolution (4K, 8K, ...) in recent years, but can
    elderly eyes actually tell the difference? Are you still watching Freeview
    in SD so there's no higher definition being received to be displayed?

    The 4K/etc only really matters for streaming viewing, and often then it's gatekept behind an additional cost (eg 4K Netflix is more expensive than regular Netflix).

    How much useful would a slightly bigger set be?
    Is the old set failing in some way?
    Is it using older tech (CRT, plasma)?

    A starting point may be to assume that all the smart features will make
    things worse not better (having to learn how to operate a new 'operating system', plus privacy issues).

    Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Jan 21 13:56:12 2025
    On 21/01/2025 11:15, Theo wrote:
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired
    headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing
    for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're just platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an HDMI
    port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on the iPlayer
    app which may be a dealbreaker. nvidia Shield is probably the next least worst streaming box.

    Unfortunately any kind of internet TV is a PITA for geriatric users if they aren't used to navigating on screen menus (ie just expect channels 1,2,3,...), because everything is an 'app' nowadays.

    The least spying option is to buy a monitor and connect a box via HDMI, but it's hard to find an internet TV box that also takes aerial input.

    Thats where a small computer with a WinTV dongle or card running e.g.
    Kodi scores.


    Theo

    --
    It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house
    for the voice of the kingdom.

    Jonathan Swift

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 13:29:24 2025
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:23:08 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing
    for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Model numbers for the Humax and the TV might help us to understand the
    current capabilities.

    As others have said, minimum change is what most senior users want.

    If the current TV has Internet capability (beyond just automatic updates)
    then it must be at least fairly smart.

    Starting point might be another Panasonic if the software is similar.

    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Pancho on Tue Jan 21 13:57:38 2025
    On 21/01/2025 11:53, Pancho wrote:
    On 1/21/25 11:15, Theo wrote:
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired
    headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing >>> for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're just
    platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an HDMI
    port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on the iPlayer
    app which may be a dealbreaker. nvidia Shield is probably the next least
    worst streaming box.

    Unfortunately any kind of internet TV is a PITA for geriatric users if
    they
    aren't used to navigating on screen menus (ie just expect channels
    1,2,3,...), because everything is an 'app' nowadays.

    The least spying option is to buy a monitor and connect a box via
    HDMI, but
    it's hard to find an internet TV box that also takes aerial input.


    I think it is easier to use a PC as a TV, easier than it is to use a
    smart TV. You just need to replace the remote with a keyboard and mouse.

    And those can be wireless too.

    I have a 55 inch TCL and a comfy chair at a viewing distance of 1.8m (suitable size/distance for 2K resolution). I use the mouse on my
    (leather) armchair chair arm, and keyboard in my lap.

    +1

    I've not watched broadcast TV for many years, but you can handle it by
    using a server on your LAN running something like like TV headend, to
    stream it across the LAN.

    +2

    How much you will get a geriatric to adopt, depends on their familiarity
    with PCs, and particularly a suitable/close viewing arrangement.

    I tried this with my Mum, but she was normally much happier on her tablet.

    That tends to be the case.



    --
    It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house
    for the voice of the kingdom.

    Jonathan Swift

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to codger on Tue Jan 21 14:12:09 2025
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:
    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?
    No:-)

    Has she actually asked for one ?
    No:-)

    Of will it just make your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her ?
    Probably. I suppose they have more recent sets of their own and prefer
    the upgrade options.


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    We have talked about an upgrade. One side of the dormer provides a
    convenient site. Visitors tend to be entertained in our kitchen diner
    which has some comfortable chairs and avoids climbing stairs!

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?
    AFAIK the Panasonic doesn't do headphones and sound out together
    although I guess this could be covered by a different audio box/speakers.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Jan 21 14:03:27 2025
    On 21/01/2025 12:42, Theo wrote:
    codger <codger@anon.com> wrote:

    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?

    Has she actually asked for one ?

    Of will it just make your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her ?


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole >> lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?

    +1. What is actually deficient with the current set?

    TVs have got higher resolution (4K, 8K, ...) in recent years, but can
    elderly eyes actually tell the difference? Are you still watching Freeview in SD so there's no higher definition being received to be displayed?

    I acquired for a fgutire projecxt a sort of display monitor - the things
    you find in the doctors surgery etc. Its HD resolution only but fucking
    huge

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/HL400UPB-39-IN-1920X1080-16-9/dp/B0B7XBTDCZ

    Coupled to a reasonable computer with a TV or satalleite card or dongle
    and its an ideal media centre.


    The 4K/etc only really matters for streaming viewing, and often then it's gatekept behind an additional cost (eg 4K Netflix is more expensive than regular Netflix).

    How much useful would a slightly bigger set be?
    Is the old set failing in some way?
    Is it using older tech (CRT, plasma)?

    A starting point may be to assume that all the smart features will make things worse not better (having to learn how to operate a new 'operating system', plus privacy issues).

    Yes. I have completely given up trying to use a smart TV on the general internet.
    A PC is infinitely better


    Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

    Theo

    --
    It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house
    for the voice of the kingdom.

    Jonathan Swift

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 13:50:11 2025
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Headphone may be Bluetooth these days

    You can get limited functionality remote controls

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/big-button-remote-control/s?k=big+button+remote+control

    My mother, who has limited sight, now used Alexa for many TV related tasks.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to codger on Tue Jan 21 13:57:34 2025
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:


    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    As eyesight gets worse having a larger screen may be a benefit.

    A 42" flat screen TV is the equivalent to a 21" crt TV of the past if
    you take into consideration the front size of a typical cabinet the CRT
    was fitted in.




    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jon@21:1/5 to Pancho on Tue Jan 21 14:17:06 2025
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 11:53:21 +0000, Pancho wrote:

    On 1/21/25 11:15, Theo wrote:
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're just
    platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an HDMI
    port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on the
    iPlayer app which may be a dealbreaker. nvidia Shield is probably the
    next least worst streaming box.

    Unfortunately any kind of internet TV is a PITA for geriatric users if
    they aren't used to navigating on screen menus (ie just expect channels
    1,2,3,...), because everything is an 'app' nowadays.

    The least spying option is to buy a monitor and connect a box via HDMI,
    but it's hard to find an internet TV box that also takes aerial input.


    I think it is easier to use a PC as a TV, easier than it is to use a
    smart TV. You just need to replace the remote with a keyboard and mouse.

    I have a 55 inch TCL and a comfy chair at a viewing distance of 1.8m (suitable size/distance for 2K resolution). I use the mouse on my
    (leather) armchair chair arm, and keyboard in my lap.

    I've not watched broadcast TV for many years, but you can handle it by
    using a server on your LAN running something like like TV headend, to
    stream it across the LAN.

    How much you will get a geriatric to adopt, depends on their familiarity
    with PCs, and particularly a suitable/close viewing arrangement.

    I tried this with my Mum, but she was normally much happier on her
    tablet.

    Touche Mr Pancho

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 14:29:37 2025
    On 21/01/2025 13:50, alan_m wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Headphone may be Bluetooth these days
    That is what I use. Bose, 'king expensive! No sound out for anyone else.

    You can get limited functionality remote controls

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/big-button-remote-control/s? k=big+button+remote+control
    Interesting.

    My mother, who has limited sight, now used Alexa for many TV related tasks.
    Is that *remote* Alexa or something dedicated to the TV? I find the idea
    of a living room microphone linked to a different country rather disturbing.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 14:34:50 2025
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:
    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?
    No:-)

    Has she actually asked for one ?
    No:-)

    Of will it just make your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her ?
    Probably. I suppose they have more recent sets of their own and prefer
    the upgrade options.


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    We have talked about an upgrade. One side of the dormer provides a
    convenient site. Visitors tend to be entertained in our kitchen diner
    which has some comfortable chairs and avoids climbing stairs!

    What does 'upgrade' mean exactly? 'Bigger', or something else?

    In the last 10 years TVs have moved from being a device which competed on picture quality and features, to being loss-leaders where most of the profit is coming from the manufacturer selling *you* as the product to advertisers:

    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/11/an-ad-giant-wants-to-control-your-next-tvs-operating-system/
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/10/streaming-industry-has-unprecedented-surveillance-manipulation-capabilities/
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/09/lg-tvs-continue-down-advertising-rabbit-hole-with-new-screensaver-ads/
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/tv-industrys-ads-tracking-obsession-is-turning-your-living-room-into-a-store/
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/04/the-spam-came-from-inside-the-house-how-a-smart-tv-can-choke-a-windows-pc/
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/walmart-buying-tv-brand-vizio-for-its-ad-fueling-customer-data/
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/after-luring-customers-with-low-prices-amazon-stuffs-fire-tvs-with-ads/
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/01/some-roku-smart-tvs-are-now-showing-banner-ads-over-live-tv/

    When you stop being the customer and become the product, the experience suffers.

    So don't assume that newer == better, because it's not always true in the current world. Unfortunately for an elderly user this is even more
    difficult to navigate, because TV manufacturers are not incentivised to make things easy for you.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Johnson@21:1/5 to theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk on Tue Jan 21 15:14:59 2025
    On 21 Jan 2025 11:15:21 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:


    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're just >platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.


    My (Sony) TV is connected to the internet and I don't see any adverts,
    apart from those broadcast on ITV &c, which I avoid by programming a
    'skip ads' button on my universal remote.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Davey on Tue Jan 21 15:21:15 2025
    On 21/01/2025 11:20 AM, Davey wrote:
    On 21 Jan 2025 11:15:21 +0000 (GMT)
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user?
    Say 50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're
    just platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an
    HDMI port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on
    the iPlayer app which may be a dealbreaker.

    And Amazon Prime just emailed me to say I wasn't using a benefit of
    Prime, ie Apple+ TV. No subtitles, no interest, Bye.

    Isn't Apple+TV obtainable on Amazon Prime only by payment of an extra sub?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Jan 21 16:12:04 2025
    On 21/01/2025 10:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    Crikey. Must have a big living room


    For those of use with fading eyesight the bigger the better.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    I'm out of that market...don't you need a set top box for recording? And
    is there such a thing as an understandable button set?


    I think for the past 10 years most TVs have had built record capability.
    You often need to add USB connected storage but then it means if you
    don't use it you are not paying for disk drive you don't need and if you
    do need it you can change which size you need ...

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 16:20:44 2025
    On 21/01/2025 14:29, Timatmarford wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 13:50, alan_m wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Headphone may be Bluetooth these days
    That is what I use. Bose, 'king expensive! No sound out for anyone else.

    You can get limited functionality remote controls

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/big-button-remote-control/s?
    k=big+button+remote+control
    Interesting.

    My mother, who has limited sight, now used Alexa for many TV related
    tasks.
    Is that *remote* Alexa or something dedicated to the TV? I find the idea
    of a living room microphone linked to a different country rather
    disturbing.

    We find that the link between Alexa and the TV drops so we don't use it
    much, but if you are living alone and have arthritic hands and can't see
    the buttons on the remote, then being able to say

    "alexa set the TV to ITV1"

    probably more than compensates for the fact that some one in Trumpland
    or possibly even Putinville could listening to your farts, snores, or
    grunts of pleasure from self abuse....

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Tue Jan 21 16:22:08 2025
    On 21/01/2025 14:12, Timatmarford wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:
    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?
    No:-)

    Has she actually asked for one ?
    No:-)

    Of will it just make your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her ?
    Probably. I suppose they have more recent sets of their own and prefer
    the upgrade options.


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole >> lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    We have talked about an upgrade. One side of the dormer provides a
    convenient site. Visitors tend to be entertained in our kitchen diner
    which has some comfortable chairs and avoids climbing stairs!

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?
    AFAIK the Panasonic doesn't do headphones and sound out together
    although I guess this could be covered by a different audio box/speakers.

    I just had a quick check and the Panasonic TX-50MX800B has a headphone
    output. I would think that others in the range do as well. As for ease
    of use, the TV can use Alexa, so that /might/ be of help is she has an
    internet connection.

    Recording is more of a problem. The TV has only one tuner so even if it
    could record (it can't) she couldn't watch one channel while recording
    another. I have no idea if other makes with a recording facility can
    record on a different channel from that being watched. So that leaves a freestanding recorder. Panasonic no longer seem to do a "simple" PVR -
    they combine it with Blu-ray/DVD. Probably the cheapest PVR these days
    is a Manhattan T4R 500GB, which might be worth a look. In any case, I
    wouldn't be surprised if PVRs disappeared completely within a few years,
    so we'll have to stream everything. :-((((((((((

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AnthonyL@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 20:48:23 2025
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:12:04 +0000, David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 21/01/2025 10:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    Crikey. Must have a big living room


    For those of use with fading eyesight the bigger the better.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    I'm out of that market...don't you need a set top box for recording? And
    is there such a thing as an understandable button set?


    I think for the past 10 years most TVs have had built record capability.
    You often need to add USB connected storage but then it means if you
    don't use it you are not paying for disk drive you don't need and if you
    do need it you can change which size you need ...


    Unless the TV had more than one tuner then it has to be on the channel
    that is being recorded, or at least certainly on my LG.

    We added a quite cheap and cheerful USB drive which allows readily for
    either recording or pause. The pause button gets used quite a lot.


    --
    AnthonyL

    Why ever wait to finish a job before starting the next?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Jan 22 01:14:06 2025
    On 21/01/2025 10:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    Crikey. Must have a big living room

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    I'm out of that market...don't you need a set top box for recording? And
    is there such a thing as an understandable button set?

    Most TVs have a basic recording capability if you plug a USB drive into
    them for storage. It tends to be a bit limited though - often only
    allowing recording something from the same mux or possibly the same
    channel (they don't usually have multiple tuners), and quite often the recording is encrypted and DRM tied to the set, so you can't move it
    elsewhere or watch on a different device.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 22 01:24:24 2025
    On 21/01/2025 13:57, alan_m wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:


    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their
    whole
    lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    As eyesight gets worse having a larger screen may be a benefit.

    A 42" flat screen TV is the equivalent to a 21" crt TV of the past if
    you take into consideration the front size of a typical cabinet the CRT
    was fitted in.

    also TVs of old gave a taller picture for a given diagonal by virtue of
    not being widescreen. So you need to go 40+" in widescreen to watch
    something 4:3 at the same size you used to see it on a 29" 4:3 TV.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Jan 22 01:19:30 2025
    On 21/01/2025 13:56, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 11:15, Theo wrote:
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired
    headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing >>> for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    If you buy a 'smart' TV, don't connect it to the internet. They're just
    platforms for spying and showing adverts nowadays.

    If you want online service buy a streaming box and plug it into an HDMI
    port. Apple TV is least spyingest but there's no subtitles on the iPlayer
    app which may be a dealbreaker. nvidia Shield is probably the next least
    worst streaming box.

    Unfortunately any kind of internet TV is a PITA for geriatric users if
    they
    aren't used to navigating on screen menus (ie just expect channels
    1,2,3,...), because everything is an 'app' nowadays.

    The least spying option is to buy a monitor and connect a box via
    HDMI, but
    it's hard to find an internet TV box that also takes aerial input.

    Thats where a small computer with a WinTV dongle or card running e.g.
    Kodi scores.

    or a network connected TV tuner:

    https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/DIY_Personal_Video_Recorder_(PVR)


    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to AnthonyL on Wed Jan 22 07:40:07 2025
    On 21/01/2025 20:48, AnthonyL wrote:
    Unless the TV had more than one tuner then it has to be on the channel
    that is being recorded, or at least certainly on my LG.

    It has to be on the same MUX yes, but not necessarily on the same
    'channel' since there cab be up to 12 'channels' on the same frequency...

    In general there are 6 MUXES on any given transmitter tower.
    Broadcasting at different frequencies and powers..

    https://ukfree.tv/transmitters/multiplexes

    Plus the occasional 'local' one



    We added a quite cheap and cheerful USB drive which allows readily for
    either recording or pause. The pause button gets used quite a lot.

    --
    "Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social
    conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the
    windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.) "

    Alan Sokal

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Jan 22 09:12:19 2025
    On 22/01/2025 01:14, John Rumm wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 10:23, Timatmarford wrote:
    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user?
    Say 50" ish.

    Crikey. Must have a big living room

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    I'm out of that market...don't you need a set top box for recording?
    And is there such a thing as an understandable button set?

    Most TVs have a basic recording capability if you plug a USB drive into
    them for storage. It tends to be a bit limited though - often only
    allowing recording something from the same mux or possibly the same
    channel (they don't usually have multiple tuners), and quite often the recording is encrypted and DRM tied to the set, so you can't move it elsewhere or watch on a different device.

    Right.
    I misinterpreted the promotional blurb on Modern TVs.
    I suspect a Manhattan or BT box controls will be a struggle for the
    intended user who has just about mastered her Humax:-)

    Why can one buy a new TV for £350 and something that appears similar for £3500?


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Wed Jan 22 10:25:45 2025
    On 22/01/2025 09:12, Timatmarford wrote:

    Why can one buy a new TV for £350 and something that appears similar for £3500?

    Different technologies?

    One TV may have LCD (Liquid Cyrstal Display) flat panel and the other a
    OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) flat panel. The latter will be much
    more expensive.

    The former requires a light source behind it and on cheaper models this
    likely to be a single source at the side of the panel while on the more expensive models it will an array of LEDS directly behind the LCD panel.

    Some LCD panels have a much wider viewing angle while some a more
    restricted viewing angle. A LCD with a narrower viewing angle is
    probably OK where all the people viewing the TV are sitting in front of
    the screen but in a room where the seating arrangement means some people
    are viewing the screen off-axis they will see a degraded picture (washed
    out colours and lower contrast).

    A more expensive TV may have a better image processing engine
    (electronic image processing chip).

    You may be paying more for branding.

    How much some of the differences matter is up to the consumer to choose.

    I have two LCDs TVS, a 55 inch towards the top end of the price range
    and a much smaller TV for the bedroom at the lowest end of the price
    range. The difference in picture quality is like chalk and cheese but
    both produce a watchable picture.


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 22 12:00:51 2025
    On 22/01/2025 10:25, alan_m wrote:
    On 22/01/2025 09:12, Timatmarford wrote:

    Why can one buy a new TV for £350 and something that appears similar
    for £3500?

    Different technologies?

    One TV may have LCD (Liquid Cyrstal Display) flat panel and the other a
    OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) flat panel. The latter will be much
    more expensive.

    The former requires a light source behind it and on cheaper models this likely to be a single source at the side of the panel while on the more expensive models it will an array of LEDS directly behind the LCD panel.

    Some LCD panels have a much wider viewing angle while some a more
    restricted viewing angle. A LCD with a narrower viewing angle is
    probably OK where all the people viewing the TV are sitting in front of
    the screen but in a room where the seating arrangement means some people
    are viewing the screen off-axis they will see a degraded picture (washed
    out colours and lower contrast).

    A more expensive TV may have a better image processing engine
    (electronic image processing chip).

    You may be paying more for branding.

    How much some of the differences matter is up to the consumer to choose.

    I have two LCDs TVS, a 55 inch towards the top end of the price range
    and a much smaller TV for the bedroom at the lowest end of the price
    range.  The difference in picture quality is like chalk and cheese but
    both produce a watchable picture.

    Umm. So if a set claims OLED features for £499 it will be the 4k version
    but must also have made savings elsewhere?
    Thanks for the explanation. (Latin is Greek to me)



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From fread@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Wed Jan 22 12:04:51 2025
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in
    news:lvbr3jFak7fU1@mid.individual.net:


    Right.
    I misinterpreted the promotional blurb on Modern TVs.
    I suspect a Manhattan or BT box controls will be a struggle for the
    intended user who has just about mastered her Humax:-)


    What it her current humie? I am still on the old school HDR-2000T (discontinued) and find its EPG far more user friendly than their newer offerings but it does not offer access to streaming channels so I look
    ahead and record items of interest. This adds the benefit of skipping
    adverts.

    If kids (of any age) are messing with the settings then ban them from using
    it until they learn.

    If the current or another humie might serve the purpose then maybe a dumb display would do the job. At 50" (essential<?>) it will need to be a TV.

    Totally with Theo on the streaming == spying thing, I have no time for it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Wed Jan 22 12:57:17 2025
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 22/01/2025 10:25, alan_m wrote:
    On 22/01/2025 09:12, Timatmarford wrote:

    Why can one buy a new TV for £350 and something that appears similar
    for £3500?

    Different technologies?

    One TV may have LCD (Liquid Cyrstal Display) flat panel and the other a OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) flat panel. The latter will be much more expensive.

    The former requires a light source behind it and on cheaper models this likely to be a single source at the side of the panel while on the more expensive models it will an array of LEDS directly behind the LCD panel.

    Some LCD panels have a much wider viewing angle while some a more restricted viewing angle. A LCD with a narrower viewing angle is
    probably OK where all the people viewing the TV are sitting in front of
    the screen but in a room where the seating arrangement means some people are viewing the screen off-axis they will see a degraded picture (washed out colours and lower contrast).

    A more expensive TV may have a better image processing engine
    (electronic image processing chip).

    You may be paying more for branding.

    How much some of the differences matter is up to the consumer to choose.

    I have two LCDs TVS, a 55 inch towards the top end of the price range
    and a much smaller TV for the bedroom at the lowest end of the price range.  The difference in picture quality is like chalk and cheese but both produce a watchable picture.

    Umm. So if a set claims OLED features for £499 it will be the 4k version
    but must also have made savings elsewhere?
    Thanks for the explanation. (Latin is Greek to me)

    Be aware that Samsung and others have QLED which you might read as OLED if
    you don't have your specs on, but is actually regular LCDs but with added 'quantum dots':
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dot_display

    Very roughly, it's a technique to make better coloured filters for the
    typical white backlight, resulting in deeper colours. ie you start with a white light, you filter out the other colours to make red, then you pass it through the LCD 'shutter' to decide how much red light you output. Combine with green filters and blue filters and you make the RGB colours.

    Meanwhile an OLED is just a tiny red (or green or blue) light that you can light as bright as you like. OLEDs tend to have deeper contrast because you can turn them off completely, while a filter-based display is always going to leak
    some light.

    The cheapest OLED at Currys is £699 but the cheapest QLED is £199.

    4K is pretty much standard these days - it's only budget models which are 1080p. At Currys:

    'Full HD' (1080p): 41 models
    4K: 380 models
    8K: 14 models

    (other retailers are available)

    For elderly eyes who sit far from the screen I'm not sure it's going to make
    a lot of difference. You could go to a shop and compare, but note they tend
    to show over-bright over-contrasty images on their demo videos - better to compare playing live TV if you can.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Wed Jan 22 13:43:31 2025
    On 22/01/2025 12:00, Timatmarford wrote:
    On 22/01/2025 10:25, alan_m wrote:
    On 22/01/2025 09:12, Timatmarford wrote:

    Why can one buy a new TV for £350 and something that appears similar
    for £3500?

    Different technologies?

    One TV may have LCD (Liquid Cyrstal Display) flat panel and the other
    a OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) flat panel. The latter will be
    much more expensive.

    The former requires a light source behind it and on cheaper models
    this likely to be a single source at the side of the panel while on
    the more expensive models it will an array of LEDS directly behind the
    LCD panel.

    Some LCD panels have a much wider viewing angle while some a more
    restricted viewing angle. A LCD with a narrower viewing angle is
    probably OK where all the people viewing the TV are sitting in front
    of the screen but in a room where the seating arrangement means some
    people are viewing the screen off-axis they will see a degraded
    picture (washed out colours and lower contrast).

    A more expensive TV may have a better image processing engine
    (electronic image processing chip).

    You may be paying more for branding.

    How much some of the differences matter is up to the consumer to choose.

    I have two LCDs TVS, a 55 inch towards the top end of the price range
    and a much smaller TV for the bedroom at the lowest end of the price
    range.  The difference in picture quality is like chalk and cheese but
    both produce a watchable picture.

    Umm. So if a set claims OLED features for £499 it will be the 4k version
    but must also have made savings elsewhere?

    Most OLED sets start at around 700 to 800 for the smaller sizes (i.e.
    under 50").

    But yup generally larger is more expensive, as are more features.

    IME making sure you get a "high dynamic range" (HDR) capability is well
    worth having. I find a much more noticeable improvement in enjoyment
    moving from "normal" to HDR than from moving to 4K from HD for example - especially with OLED which really highlights the effect.



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed Jan 22 14:06:58 2025
    On 22/01/2025 12:57, Theo wrote:

    Meanwhile an OLED is just a tiny red (or green or blue) light that you can light as bright as you like. OLEDs tend to have deeper contrast because you can turn them off completely, while a filter-based display is always going to leak
    some light.

    On some LCD backlights which are arrays of LEDS areas can be dynamically switched off to give deep blacks because there is no light behind the
    LCD to leak through. However, all these features to enhance the picture
    tend to increase the price of the TV.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Wed Jan 22 20:21:47 2025
    On 21/01/2025 16:22, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 14:12, Timatmarford wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:
    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?
    No:-)

    Has she actually asked for one ?
    No:-)

    Of will it just make  your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her  ?
    Probably. I suppose they have more recent sets of their own and prefer
    the upgrade options.


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user?
    Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their
    whole
    lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    We have talked about an upgrade. One side of the dormer provides a
    convenient site. Visitors tend to be entertained in our kitchen diner
    which has some comfortable chairs and avoids climbing stairs!

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?
    AFAIK the Panasonic doesn't do headphones and sound out together
    although I guess this could be covered by a different audio box/speakers.

    I just had a quick check and the Panasonic TX-50MX800B has a headphone output. I would think that others in the range do as well. As for ease
    of use, the TV can use Alexa, so that /might/ be of help is she has an internet connection.

    Recording is more of a problem. The TV has only one tuner so even if it
    could record (it can't) she couldn't watch one channel while recording another. I have no idea if other makes with a recording facility can
    record on a different channel from that being watched. So that leaves a freestanding recorder. Panasonic no longer seem to do a "simple" PVR -
    they combine it with Blu-ray/DVD. Probably the cheapest PVR these days
    is a Manhattan T4R 500GB, which might be worth a look. In any case, I wouldn't be surprised if PVRs disappeared completely within a few years,
    so we'll have to stream everything. :-((((((((((

    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they
    don't give you the manual:-(


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to David on Wed Jan 22 20:33:54 2025
    On 21/01/2025 13:29, David wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:23:08 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired
    headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing
    for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Model numbers for the Humax and the TV might help us to understand the current capabilities.

    Humax HDR-FOXT2 (500GB?) Panasonic Tx-L37E5B

    As others have said, minimum change is what most senior users want.

    If the current TV has Internet capability (beyond just automatic updates) then it must be at least fairly smart.

    Starting point might be another Panasonic if the software is similar.

    Sadly she is quite happy provided it keeps working! The solution to
    whatever the GCs did was to switch off the Humax at the main isolator
    rather than the handset switch.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Wed Jan 22 21:49:03 2025
    On 22 Jan 2025 at 20:21:47 GMT, "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:

    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they
    don't give you the manual:-(

    Manuals for pretty much anything are always available somewhere on the Internet. You just need to do a bit of giggling.

    --
    When I saw how the European Union was developing, it was very obvious what they had in mind was not democratic. In Britain you vote for a government so the government has to listen to you, and if you don't like it you can change it.

    Tony Benn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Wed Jan 22 22:29:37 2025
    On 22/01/2025 20:21, Timatmarford wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 16:22, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 14:12, Timatmarford wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:
    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?
    No:-)

    Has she actually asked for one ?
    No:-)

    Of will it just make  your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her  ?
    Probably. I suppose they have more recent sets of their own and prefer
    the upgrade options.


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user?
    Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their
    whole
    lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    We have talked about an upgrade. One side of the dormer provides a
    convenient site. Visitors tend to be entertained in our kitchen diner
    which has some comfortable chairs and avoids climbing stairs!

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?
    AFAIK the Panasonic doesn't do headphones and sound out together
    although I guess this could be covered by a different audio box/speakers. >>
    I just had a quick check and the Panasonic TX-50MX800B has a headphone
    output. I would think that others in the range do as well. As for ease
    of use, the TV can use Alexa, so that /might/ be of help is she has an
    internet connection.

    Recording is more of a problem. The TV has only one tuner so even if it
    could record (it can't) she couldn't watch one channel while recording
    another. I have no idea if other makes with a recording facility can
    record on a different channel from that being watched. So that leaves a
    freestanding recorder. Panasonic no longer seem to do a "simple" PVR -
    they combine it with Blu-ray/DVD. Probably the cheapest PVR these days
    is a Manhattan T4R 500GB, which might be worth a look. In any case, I
    wouldn't be surprised if PVRs disappeared completely within a few years,
    so we'll have to stream everything. :-((((((((((

    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they
    don't give you the manual:-(

    <https://manhattan-tv.com/support/manhattan-t2-r#user-guides>

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Jan 22 22:18:13 2025
    On 22/01/2025 21:49, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 22 Jan 2025 at 20:21:47 GMT, "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:

    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they
    don't give you the manual:-(

    Manuals for pretty much anything are always available somewhere on the Internet. You just need to do a bit of giggling.


    +1
    Before buying a new TV its also worth downloading the manual and looking
    at the specification there in case the headline advertising has
    mis-represented something. You could check if it does have a jack plug
    for headphones and where its located etc.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Jan 22 22:30:03 2025
    In article <lvd7efFhk9sU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
    On 22 Jan 2025 at 20:21:47 GMT, "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:

    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they don't give you the manual:-(

    Manuals for pretty much anything are always available somewhere on the Internet. You just need to do a bit of giggling.

    and paying (sometimes)

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 22 23:22:47 2025
    On 22/01/2025 22:18, alan_m wrote:
    On 22/01/2025 21:49, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 22 Jan 2025 at 20:21:47 GMT, "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:

    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they
    don't give you the manual:-(

    Manuals for pretty much anything are always available somewhere on the
    Internet. You just need to do a bit of giggling.


    +1
    Before buying a new TV its also worth downloading the manual and looking
    at the specification there in case the headline advertising has mis- represented something. You could check if it does have a jack plug for headphones and where its located etc.

    In my case, the manual showed (unlike every advert from any retailer),
    that the TV I was considering buying had a satellite input as well as
    the digital terrestrial inputs, HDMIs, RCAs, VGA, Ethernet, etc. I
    actually only needed the HDMIs, as I use an Linux box running OpenVix
    for most things and a Firestick for Prime, Netflix and catch-up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Wed Jan 22 23:42:21 2025
    On 22/01/2025 20:21, Timatmarford wrote:


    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they
    don't give you the manual:-(

    https://argos-support.co.uk/instruction-manual/7608625-manhattan-t2-r-500gb-freeview-hd-recorder.pdf





    --
    Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jan 23 08:52:05 2025
    On 22/01/2025 23:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/01/2025 20:21, Timatmarford wrote:


    I have a Manhattan T2R I haven't learned how to use. Second hand, they
    don't give you the manual:-(

    https://argos-support.co.uk/instruction-manual/7608625-manhattan-t2- r-500gb-freeview-hd-recorder.pdf

    Duly printed off. Thanks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to Andrew on Thu Jan 23 22:52:52 2025
    On 1/23/25 22:17, Andrew wrote:

    +1.  What is actually deficient with the current set?


    Well, if it is more than 10 years old (36 inch so quite
    possibly it is) then a modern replacement of say, 43 inch
    will typically use half the power of the existing set.


    My new 55 inch LCD was more like 25% the power of the 10 year old one,
    44 watts vs 166 watts.

    If used for more than a few hours a day then the savings
    soon add up.


    Indeed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu Jan 23 22:17:28 2025
    On 21/01/2025 12:42, Theo wrote:
    codger <codger@anon.com> wrote:

    "Timatmarford" <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:lv9ascFso5iU1@mid.individual.net...

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and wired headphones,
    aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are pushing for a TV
    upgrade pressie!

    But is the "recipient" pushing for a TV upgrade ?

    Has she actually asked for one ?

    Of will it just make your family *feel good about themselves*
    forcing an unwelcome upgrade on her ?


    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say 50" ish.

    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their whole >> lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and understandable button set!

    Which presumably she already has and understands. So which part of
    the present set-up will actually *need* replacing in the foreseeable
    future do you think ?

    +1. What is actually deficient with the current set?


    Well, if it is more than 10 years old (36 inch so quite
    possibly it is) then a modern replacement of say, 43 inch
    will typically use half the power of the existing set.

    If used for more than a few hours a day then the savings
    soon add up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Fri Jan 24 12:42:16 2025
    On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:33:54 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    On 21/01/2025 13:29, David wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:23:08 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say
    50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Model numbers for the Humax and the TV might help us to understand the
    current capabilities.

    Humax HDR-FOXT2 (500GB?) Panasonic Tx-L37E5B

    As others have said, minimum change is what most senior users want.

    If the current TV has Internet capability (beyond just automatic
    updates)
    then it must be at least fairly smart.

    Starting point might be another Panasonic if the software is similar.

    Sadly she is quite happy provided it keeps working! The solution to
    whatever the GCs did was to switch off the Humax at the main isolator
    rather than the handset switch.



    I have a Humax sat box, and a very smart 4K TV.
    At the moment there is no aerial connected to the TV and I just use it as
    a large monitor, controlling everything through the Humax.

    Is there any reason not to just keep using the Humax with a bigger screen?

    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to David on Fri Jan 24 13:03:19 2025
    On 24/01/2025 12:42, David wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:33:54 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    On 21/01/2025 13:29, David wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:23:08 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say >>>> 50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Model numbers for the Humax and the TV might help us to understand the
    current capabilities.

    Humax HDR-FOXT2 (500GB?) Panasonic Tx-L37E5B

    As others have said, minimum change is what most senior users want.

    If the current TV has Internet capability (beyond just automatic
    updates)
    then it must be at least fairly smart.

    Starting point might be another Panasonic if the software is similar.

    Sadly she is quite happy provided it keeps working! The solution to
    whatever the GCs did was to switch off the Humax at the main isolator
    rather than the handset switch.



    I have a Humax sat box, and a very smart 4K TV.
    At the moment there is no aerial connected to the TV and I just use it as
    a large monitor, controlling everything through the Humax.

    Is there any reason not to just keep using the Humax with a bigger screen?

    Probably not for her usual TV choices. Visitors tend to want what they
    have at home.

    I have views on set top boxes probably emanating from Topfield
    experiences and am now on my second used BT box.

    Youngest daughter insists on signing us up for Netflix etc. hence the
    internet connection....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to David on Fri Jan 24 13:25:50 2025
    On 24/01/2025 12:42, David wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:33:54 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    On 21/01/2025 13:29, David wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:23:08 +0000, Timatmarford wrote:

    Current main set is a Panasonic Viera 36" plus Humax recorder and
    wired headphones, aerial and internet input.

    Principle user is close to her 80th. birthday and our family are
    pushing for a TV upgrade pressie!

    Anyone care to comment on something suitable for a geriatric user? Say >>>> 50" ish.

    She needs headphone sound out, easy recording capability and
    understandable button set!

    Model numbers for the Humax and the TV might help us to understand the
    current capabilities.

    Humax HDR-FOXT2 (500GB?) Panasonic Tx-L37E5B

    As others have said, minimum change is what most senior users want.

    If the current TV has Internet capability (beyond just automatic
    updates)
    then it must be at least fairly smart.

    Starting point might be another Panasonic if the software is similar.

    Sadly she is quite happy provided it keeps working! The solution to
    whatever the GCs did was to switch off the Humax at the main isolator
    rather than the handset switch.



    I have a Humax sat box, and a very smart 4K TV.
    At the moment there is no aerial connected to the TV and I just use it as
    a large monitor, controlling everything through the Humax.

    Is there any reason not to just keep using the Humax with a bigger screen?

    Of course not

    And you can in fact buy 'just a bigger screen' if you want with no TV
    tuner at all.

    Monitors up to around 45" are available at sub £500 prices

    And can be used with your PC as well!



    --
    All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that
    all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is
    fully understood.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Jan 24 15:00:11 2025
    On 24/01/2025 13:25, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


    And you can in fact buy 'just a bigger screen' if you want with no TV
    tuner at all.

    Monitors up to around 45" are available at sub £500 prices

    And can be used with your PC as well!


    And both of these are available with a TV and a set top box or to a PC
    via a wired connection or wifi via the home network.

    In general a STB doesn't care what size screen its connected to, as long
    as has a HDMI output.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Fri Jan 24 14:49:05 2025
    On 24/01/2025 13:03, Timatmarford wrote:


    I have views on set top boxes probably emanating from Topfield
    experiences and am now on my second used  BT box.

    Good or bad experiences with the Topfield box, and was it running MyStuff?


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 24 17:41:14 2025
    On 24/01/2025 14:49, alan_m wrote:

    On 24/01/2025 13:03, Timatmarford wrote:


    I have views on set top boxes probably emanating from Topfield
    experiences and am now on my second used  BT box.

    Good or bad experiences with the Topfield box, and was it running MyStuff?

    Very good while it worked:-) Mine had the Chinese electrolytic capacitor
    issue with the power supply. Kit of parts sorted that but a transistor
    died in the tuner section and I decided to keep it as a mouldy oldie
    film store. Clint Eastwood etc.
    I like my BT box. Reliability not perfect but second-hand anyway.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Mon Jan 27 11:34:54 2025
    On 22/01/2025 01:24 AM, John Rumm wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 13:57, alan_m wrote:
    On 21/01/2025 12:26, codger wrote:


    Have you actually asked *her*. Some people don;t actually wish their
    whole
    lives and living rooms to be dominated by large screen TV's

    As eyesight gets worse having a larger screen may be a benefit.

    A 42" flat screen TV is the equivalent to a 21" crt TV of the past if
    you take into consideration the front size of a typical cabinet the
    CRT was fitted in.

    also TVs of old gave a taller picture for a given diagonal by virtue of
    not being widescreen. So you need to go 40+" in widescreen to watch
    something 4:3 at the same size you used to see it on a 29" 4:3 TV.

    Another "feature" of flatscreen TV sets is that they are placed closer
    to the wall behind with less wasted space, not having a protruding CR
    tube. This itself moves the set from the viewer, which may need to be compensated for by a bigger screen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)