Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going
on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
Try <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
<font color="#000000">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo</font> <font color="#000000"></font>
<font color="#000000">but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.</font>
On 15 Feb 2025 at 22:02:58 GMT, "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all
that's going on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
Try <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
That's the item I referenced. Why was your newsreader adding all that
markup?
On 15 Feb 2025 at 22:02:58 GMT, "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going
on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
Try <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
That's the item I referenced. Why was your newsreader adding all that markup?
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:07:15 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:
On 15 Feb 2025 at 22:02:58 GMT, "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all
that's going on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
Try <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
That's the item I referenced. Why was your newsreader adding all that
markup?
It was in the raw message you posted.
On Sat, 2/15/2025 5:07 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
On 15 Feb 2025 at 22:02:58 GMT, "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going
on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
Try <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
That's the item I referenced. Why was your newsreader adding all that markup?
When you need to check what you've sent later, Howard has a copy ( http://al.howardknight.net/ )
The MID you enter, has to have the less-than and greater-than characters on the ends.
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cm1ce01Fos23U1%40mid.individual.net%3E
It looks like an excess of exuberance at the Clipboard. Some Clipboard magic.
That's the item I referenced. Why was your newsreader adding all that markup?
On 16 Feb 2025 at 06:25:48 GMT, "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 2/15/2025 5:07 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
On 15 Feb 2025 at 22:02:58 GMT, "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going
on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
Try <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
That's the item I referenced. Why was your newsreader adding all that markup?
When you need to check what you've sent later, Howard has a copy (
http://al.howardknight.net/ )
The MID you enter, has to have the less-than and greater-than characters on >> the ends.
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cm1ce01Fos23U1%40mid.individual.net%3E
It looks like an excess of exuberance at the Clipboard. Some Clipboard magic.
Humph. All I did was copy the address from the Safari address bar. And concerning wrapping a URL in <>, I was under the impression that (a) most people don't, and that (b) it's only seriously advised when a URL is long enough that it's likely to wrap (which this one wasn't).
OK - looks like this needs scoping out on the Usenapp forum.
Anyway, this is a side-issue.
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's goingon in the world, that people wouldn't do this:<font color="#000000">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo</font><font color="#000000"></font><font color="#000000">but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.</font>-- "... you must remember that if you're trying to propagate a creed of poverty, gentleness and tolerance, you need a very rich, powerful, authoritarian organisation to do it." - Vice-Pope Eric
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> Wrote in message:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going
on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
I dunno. I have a grudging admiration for folk who always look for
the good in other people, no matter how much they're demonised by
other countries.
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:07:15 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:
On 15 Feb 2025 at 22:02:58 GMT, "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all
that's going on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
Try <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
That's the item I referenced. Why was your newsreader adding all that
markup?
It was in the raw message you posted.
On 16 Feb 2025 at 19:08:41 GMT, "tim+" <timdownieuk@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:that's going
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> Wrote in message:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all
when it'son in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.
I dunno. I have a grudging admiration for folk who always look for
the good in other people, no matter how much they're demonised by
other countries.
Well, you're going to find good in the general populace, mostly. But
known that a given government has form for kidnapping foreign touristsfor
political reasons, you might imagine that avoiding the country that the >goverment controls could be a wise policy.
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
<font color="#000000">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo</font> <font color="#000000"></font>
<font color="#000000">but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.</font>
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going
on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo>
but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.</font>
I see that they have been charged with spying which as far as Iran goes
that was an inevitability. It just goes to show an education and qualifications do not guarantee common sense. Getting them released is
going to cost and use up a lot of diplomatic time, there should be some
sort of pay back for putting yourself in harms way.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c743jle3vkno
Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
I dunno - it's beyond comprehension. You might imagine, with all that's going
on in the world, that people wouldn't do this:
<font color="#000000">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626p6pz7xlo</font>
<font color="#000000"></font>
<font color="#000000">but it seems that naivety knows no bounds.</font>
I see that they have been charged with spying which as far as Iran goes
that was an inevitability. It just goes to show an education and >qualifications do not guarantee common sense. Getting them released is
going to cost and use up a lot of diplomatic time, there should be some
sort of pay back for putting yourself in harms way.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c743jle3vkno
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 52:05:16 |
Calls: | 10,397 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 14,067 |
Messages: | 6,417,378 |
Posted today: | 1 |