• Thickness of plywood for flooring

    From Chris Green@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 15 21:33:04 2025
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)

    How can I decide how thick they need to be? They need to be strong
    enough to walk on but, in addition (and this will probably be the
    important thing) they need to be stiff enough so they don't deform too
    much when you walk on them.

    The 'hole' to cover is 1540mm long by 1335mm wide. There's a
    lengthwise support 595mm from one side and 740mm from the other side.

    The 'design' at the moment consists of four separate plywood panels
    across the 1335mm width. The support is not quite in the middle, so
    each panel will make two spans of 595mm and 740mm. Since the panels
    have to be lifted independently there will be no 'mutual support' as
    there would be if they were T&G panels. Each panel will be 385mm
    wide. The total size of the hole is 1335mm x 1540mm so there will be
    four panels.

    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's
    anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    Thanks everyone for the thoughts so far, I think I am getting there
    slowly! :-)

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From No mail@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Sat Feb 15 23:35:02 2025
    Chris Green wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)

    How can I decide how thick they need to be? They need to be strong
    enough to walk on but, in addition (and this will probably be the
    important thing) they need to be stiff enough so they don't deform too
    much when you walk on them.

    The 'hole' to cover is 1540mm long by 1335mm wide. There's a
    lengthwise support 595mm from one side and 740mm from the other side.

    The 'design' at the moment consists of four separate plywood panels
    across the 1335mm width. The support is not quite in the middle, so
    each panel will make two spans of 595mm and 740mm. Since the panels
    have to be lifted independently there will be no 'mutual support' as
    there would be if they were T&G panels. Each panel will be 385mm
    wide. The total size of the hole is 1335mm x 1540mm so there will be
    four panels.

    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    Thanks everyone for the thoughts so far, I think I am getting there
    slowly! :-)

    Try searching: calculate plywood deflection
    Also, might be worth contacting these people: https://www.panelsystems.co.uk/product/lightweight-sandwich-panels https://www.coretexgroup.co.uk/6.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tricky Dicky@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Sun Feb 16 09:18:42 2025
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)

    How can I decide how thick they need to be? They need to be strong
    enough to walk on but, in addition (and this will probably be the
    important thing) they need to be stiff enough so they don't deform too
    much when you walk on them.

    The 'hole' to cover is 1540mm long by 1335mm wide. There's a
    lengthwise support 595mm from one side and 740mm from the other side.

    The 'design' at the moment consists of four separate plywood panels
    across the 1335mm width. The support is not quite in the middle, so
    each panel will make two spans of 595mm and 740mm. Since the panels
    have to be lifted independently there will be no 'mutual support' as
    there would be if they were T&G panels. Each panel will be 385mm
    wide. The total size of the hole is 1335mm x 1540mm so there will be
    four panels.

    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    Thanks everyone for the thoughts so far, I think I am getting there
    slowly! :-)


    The thicker you go with the plywood the heavier it becomes and start to get awkward to manipulate within the confines of a boat. Have you considered removable supports that span either the width or length of the hatchway?
    This would enable you to use thinner ply yet removing the supporting spars would give you unrestricted access to the engine compartment.

    Richard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marland@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Sun Feb 16 10:11:21 2025
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip
    pattern already formed on the surface.

    GH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Sun Feb 16 09:28:12 2025
    Chris Green wrote:

    will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough

    Assuming you mean 3/4" ply, then I'd would say so, it's slightly better
    than 400mm centres, I'm quite a fat bastard and I *just* *about* sense
    some deflection on my garage roof, so if you want to feel no deflection
    at all maybe 1" ply?

    But I'd struggle to justify these prices

    <https://www.diy.com/timber-joinery/sheet-wood/plywood.cat?Thickness+%28mm%29=25>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Dicky on Sun Feb 16 10:13:42 2025
    Tricky Dicky <tricky.dicky@sky.com> wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)

    How can I decide how thick they need to be? They need to be strong
    enough to walk on but, in addition (and this will probably be the
    important thing) they need to be stiff enough so they don't deform too
    much when you walk on them.

    The 'hole' to cover is 1540mm long by 1335mm wide. There's a
    lengthwise support 595mm from one side and 740mm from the other side.

    The 'design' at the moment consists of four separate plywood panels
    across the 1335mm width. The support is not quite in the middle, so
    each panel will make two spans of 595mm and 740mm. Since the panels
    have to be lifted independently there will be no 'mutual support' as
    there would be if they were T&G panels. Each panel will be 385mm
    wide. The total size of the hole is 1335mm x 1540mm so there will be
    four panels.

    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    Thanks everyone for the thoughts so far, I think I am getting there
    slowly! :-)


    The thicker you go with the plywood the heavier it becomes and start to get awkward to manipulate within the confines of a boat. Have you considered removable supports that span either the width or length of the hatchway?
    This would enable you to use thinner ply yet removing the supporting spars would give you unrestricted access to the engine compartment.

    As noted above there is already one support lengthwise. I guess it
    would be fairly easy to add some more, some tabs fixed to the existing
    surround and put some lengths of U angle on them so easy to lift out.

    In fact a total redesign removing the existing (fixed) lengthwise
    piece of angle and replacing it with two or three removable ones might
    well be the way to go.

    However the weight of the hatch panels does make it more soundproof so
    I don't want to make them too thin.

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Sun Feb 16 10:19:43 2025
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Chris Green wrote:

    will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough

    Assuming you mean 3/4" ply, then I'd would say so, it's slightly better
    than 400mm centres, I'm quite a fat bastard and I *just* *about* sense
    some deflection on my garage roof, so if you want to feel no deflection
    at all maybe 1" ply?

    But I'd struggle to justify these prices

    <https://www.diy.com/timber-joinery/sheet-wood/plywood.cat?Thickness+%28mm%29=25>

    Quite! Plywood prices do seem to be all over the place with some
    sellers charging ridiculous amounts. Fortunately we have a local
    sawmill who sell ply at sensible prices. An 8' x 4' 18mm exterior
    hardwood ply sheet from them is £30.72 including VAT.

    It turns out that the existing panels are thicker than I thought, I've
    found a measurement I made a while ago that says that they are 29mm or
    so thick. Thus I can make the panels of 18mm + 9mm and simply cut
    holes in the 9mm to provide the recesses for handles.

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Marland on Sun Feb 16 11:47:59 2025
    On 16/02/2025 10:11, Marland wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's
    anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip
    pattern already formed on the surface.

    I have used this in an outside situation and I recommend it's use. It
    also provides a convenient anti-slip surface and is of course
    waterproof. It's not cheap though/

    I also feel the spans the OP requires can be accomplished with 19mm /
    3/4" board without too much deflection. I'm sure my spans are the best
    part of 700mm and their narrowest point and happy with the result.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Sun Feb 16 15:34:48 2025
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:11, Marland wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's
    anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip pattern already formed on the surface.

    I have used this in an outside situation and I recommend it's use. It
    also provides a convenient anti-slip surface and is of course
    waterproof. It's not cheap though/

    I also feel the spans the OP requires can be accomplished with 19mm /
    3/4" board without too much deflection. I'm sure my spans are the best
    part of 700mm and their narrowest point and happy with the result.

    OP here. How wide are your pieces of ply running across a 700mm span?
    Remember that I'm aiming for strips that will only be 385mm wide, not
    whole 8' x 4' chunks.

    However, as noted earlier, I've discovered that the thickness can be
    up to almost 30mm so that should help.

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Sun Feb 16 18:26:09 2025
    On 16/02/2025 10:19, Chris Green wrote:
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Chris Green wrote:

    will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough

    Assuming you mean 3/4" ply, then I'd would say so, it's slightly better
    than 400mm centres, I'm quite a fat bastard and I *just* *about* sense
    some deflection on my garage roof, so if you want to feel no deflection
    at all maybe 1" ply?

    But I'd struggle to justify these prices

    <https://www.diy.com/timber-joinery/sheet-wood/plywood.cat?Thickness+%28mm%29=25>

    Quite! Plywood prices do seem to be all over the place with some
    sellers charging ridiculous amounts. Fortunately we have a local
    sawmill who sell ply at sensible prices. An 8' x 4' 18mm exterior
    hardwood ply sheet from them is £30.72 including VAT.

    Beware, there is 'external' ply which won't last long and good
    quality stuff.

    Normal house flooring is (or was) 18mm chipboard on joists at 450mm
    centres, or 22mm on joists at 600mm centres, so your dimensions
    should allow 18mm, but a better way might be to just get a sheet of
    12mm external ply and plenty of 'blue' glue and make your own 24mm
    thick panels.

    It turns out that the existing panels are thicker than I thought, I've
    found a measurement I made a while ago that says that they are 29mm or
    so thick. Thus I can make the panels of 18mm + 9mm and simply cut
    holes in the 9mm to provide the recesses for handles.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Marland on Sun Feb 16 18:33:18 2025
    On 16/02/2025 10:11, Marland wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's
    anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip
    pattern already formed on the surface.

    GH

    Two different suppliers quote £160 and just over £60 for the same 2.4x1.2x18mm sheet !

    https://www.clevelandtimber.co.uk/products/buffalo-board-8x4-18mm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun Feb 16 18:48:36 2025
    Andrew wrote:

    Two different suppliers quote £160 and just over £60 for the same 2.4x1.2x18mm sheet !

    https://www.clevelandtimber.co.uk/products/buffalo-board-8x4-18mm

    Unless you lie on Teesside, not very flexible for delivery, eBay sellers
    seem to be better for that and not horribly expensive, I've got a
    trailer that could do with a new bed ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun Feb 16 20:21:18 2025
    On 16/02/2025 18:26, Andrew wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:19, Chris Green wrote:
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Chris Green wrote:

    will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough

    Assuming you mean 3/4" ply, then I'd would say so, it's slightly better
    than 400mm centres, I'm quite a fat bastard and I *just* *about* sense
    some deflection on my garage roof, so if you want to feel no deflection
    at all maybe 1" ply?

    But I'd struggle to justify these prices

    <https://www.diy.com/timber-joinery/sheet-wood/plywood.cat?Thickness+
    %28mm%29=25>

    Quite!  Plywood prices do seem to be all over the place with some
    sellers charging ridiculous amounts.  Fortunately we have a local
    sawmill who sell ply at sensible prices.  An 8' x 4' 18mm exterior
    hardwood ply sheet from them is £30.72 including VAT.

    Beware, there is 'external' ply which won't last long and good
    quality stuff.
    Nobody has yet mentioned Marine ply which I believe is made without
    voids and uses waterproof resin. Cost will escalate!

    Normal house flooring is (or was) 18mm chipboard on joists at 450mm
    centres, or 22mm on joists at 600mm centres, so your dimensions
    should allow 18mm, but a better way might be to just get a sheet of
    12mm external ply and plenty of 'blue' glue and make your own 24mm
    thick panels.

    It turns out that the existing panels are thicker than I thought, I've
    found a measurement I made a while ago that says that they are 29mm or
    so thick.  Thus I can make the panels of 18mm + 9mm and simply cut
    holes in the 9mm to provide the recesses for handles.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Sun Feb 16 20:39:19 2025
    Timatmarford <tim@demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 18:26, Andrew wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:19, Chris Green wrote:
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Chris Green wrote:

    will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough

    Assuming you mean 3/4" ply, then I'd would say so, it's slightly better >>> than 400mm centres, I'm quite a fat bastard and I *just* *about* sense >>> some deflection on my garage roof, so if you want to feel no deflection >>> at all maybe 1" ply?

    But I'd struggle to justify these prices

    <https://www.diy.com/timber-joinery/sheet-wood/plywood.cat?Thickness+
    %28mm%29=25>

    Quite!  Plywood prices do seem to be all over the place with some
    sellers charging ridiculous amounts.  Fortunately we have a local
    sawmill who sell ply at sensible prices.  An 8' x 4' 18mm exterior
    hardwood ply sheet from them is £30.72 including VAT.

    Beware, there is 'external' ply which won't last long and good
    quality stuff.
    Nobody has yet mentioned Marine ply which I believe is made without
    voids and uses waterproof resin. Cost will escalate!

    But Marine Ply isn't necessarily **stronger**, it's just guaranteed
    not to have voids and to have waterproof glue, etc.

    If I wanted guaranteed strength I'd surely need to go for Structural
    Ply.

    I have used the 'external hardwood ply' from my inexpensive supplier
    and it seems fine so far. None of what I'm making is going to be
    outdoors, nor would failure be catastrophic in any major way.

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Mon Feb 17 13:22:48 2025
    On 16/02/2025 15:34, Chris Green wrote:
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:11, Marland wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff
    enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen
    it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously'
    going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably
    the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's >>>> anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as >>> buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to >>> moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip
    pattern already formed on the surface.

    I have used this in an outside situation and I recommend it's use. It
    also provides a convenient anti-slip surface and is of course
    waterproof. It's not cheap though/

    I also feel the spans the OP requires can be accomplished with 19mm /
    3/4" board without too much deflection. I'm sure my spans are the best
    part of 700mm and their narrowest point and happy with the result.

    OP here. How wide are your pieces of ply running across a 700mm span? Remember that I'm aiming for strips that will only be 385mm wide, not
    whole 8' x 4' chunks.

    This is a narrowboat application where I would say the width of the
    hatch is >600mm. I haven't measured it.

    One hatch is possibly 1m long, the other 2 probably 500mm each. I found
    it to be substantive, doesn't (perceptively) bow and replaced the
    existing buffalo of the same thickness that was in a poor state.

    Some heavyweights have walked on it without drama!

    However, as noted earlier, I've discovered that the thickness can be
    up to almost 30mm so that should help.

    A 30mm sheet sounds pretty unmanageable as well as expensive. If you are concerned then ribs can be added after.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Timatmarford on Mon Feb 17 13:31:34 2025
    On 16/02/2025 20:21, Timatmarford wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 18:26, Andrew wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:19, Chris Green wrote:
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Chris Green wrote:

    will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough

    Assuming you mean 3/4" ply, then I'd would say so, it's slightly better >>>> than 400mm centres, I'm quite a fat bastard and I *just* *about* sense >>>> some deflection on my garage roof, so if you want to feel no deflection >>>> at all maybe 1" ply?

    But I'd struggle to justify these prices

    <https://www.diy.com/timber-joinery/sheet-wood/plywood.cat?
    Thickness+ %28mm%29=25>

    Quite!  Plywood prices do seem to be all over the place with some
    sellers charging ridiculous amounts.  Fortunately we have a local
    sawmill who sell ply at sensible prices.  An 8' x 4' 18mm exterior
    hardwood ply sheet from them is £30.72 including VAT.

    Beware, there is 'external' ply which won't last long and good
    quality stuff.
    Nobody has yet mentioned Marine ply which I believe is made without
    voids and uses waterproof resin. Cost will escalate!

    You have to be careful. Some marine ply can deal with moisture but not necessarily waterproof. You really need ply that is quoted as WBP, some
    marine ply is.

    Marine ply is void free whereas normal WBP can have inner layers that
    are not void free.

    Personally I would use Buffalo board. Marine ply looks filthy after a
    short with any foot traffic unless painted. Even then the paint would
    likely lift or get worn in short time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Mon Feb 17 14:00:35 2025
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 15:34, Chris Green wrote:
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:11, Marland wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff >>>> enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be
    stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen >>>> it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously' >>>> going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably >>>> the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's >>>> anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as
    buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to
    moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip
    pattern already formed on the surface.

    I have used this in an outside situation and I recommend it's use. It
    also provides a convenient anti-slip surface and is of course
    waterproof. It's not cheap though/

    I also feel the spans the OP requires can be accomplished with 19mm /
    3/4" board without too much deflection. I'm sure my spans are the best
    part of 700mm and their narrowest point and happy with the result.

    OP here. How wide are your pieces of ply running across a 700mm span? Remember that I'm aiming for strips that will only be 385mm wide, not
    whole 8' x 4' chunks.

    This is a narrowboat application where I would say the width of the
    hatch is >600mm. I haven't measured it.

    One hatch is possibly 1m long, the other 2 probably 500mm each. I found
    it to be substantive, doesn't (perceptively) bow and replaced the
    existing buffalo of the same thickness that was in a poor state.

    Some heavyweights have walked on it without drama!

    OK, thanks, it sounds as if I should be OK then. I think I have some
    scrap pieces of 18mm ply around, I will try out with one of them if I
    can find one big enough.


    However, as noted earlier, I've discovered that the thickness can be
    up to almost 30mm so that should help.

    A 30mm sheet sounds pretty unmanageable as well as expensive. If you are concerned then ribs can be added after.

    This is why the existing engine covers are so unmanageable, they are
    made of 30mm material of some sort, probably ply or similar. Lifting
    the larger one (1540mm x 740mm) with its single finger pull is, shall
    we say, difficult.

    I reckon my proposed single pieces of ply 1335mm x 385mm should be
    manageable, even if 28 to 30mm thick. I'm putting proper hand width
    lifting handles in, not just a finger pull. Making it the same
    thickness as the old covers means it can sit on the same supports.

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Mon Feb 17 18:14:24 2025
    On 17/02/2025 14:00, Chris Green wrote:
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 15:34, Chris Green wrote:
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:11, Marland wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff >>>>>> enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be >>>>>> stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen >>>>>> it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously' >>>>>> going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably >>>>>> the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's >>>>>> anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as
    buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to
    moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip >>>>> pattern already formed on the surface.

    I have used this in an outside situation and I recommend it's use. It
    also provides a convenient anti-slip surface and is of course
    waterproof. It's not cheap though/

    I also feel the spans the OP requires can be accomplished with 19mm /
    3/4" board without too much deflection. I'm sure my spans are the best >>>> part of 700mm and their narrowest point and happy with the result.

    OP here. How wide are your pieces of ply running across a 700mm span?
    Remember that I'm aiming for strips that will only be 385mm wide, not
    whole 8' x 4' chunks.

    This is a narrowboat application where I would say the width of the
    hatch is >600mm. I haven't measured it.

    One hatch is possibly 1m long, the other 2 probably 500mm each. I found
    it to be substantive, doesn't (perceptively) bow and replaced the
    existing buffalo of the same thickness that was in a poor state.

    Some heavyweights have walked on it without drama!

    OK, thanks, it sounds as if I should be OK then. I think I have some
    scrap pieces of 18mm ply around, I will try out with one of them if I
    can find one big enough.

    That's a good plan, it will give you confidence. Mine are support on
    each of the 4 edges.

    However, as noted earlier, I've discovered that the thickness can be
    up to almost 30mm so that should help.

    A 30mm sheet sounds pretty unmanageable as well as expensive. If you are
    concerned then ribs can be added after.

    This is why the existing engine covers are so unmanageable, they are
    made of 30mm material of some sort, probably ply or similar. Lifting
    the larger one (1540mm x 740mm) with its single finger pull is, shall
    we say, difficult.

    I reckon my proposed single pieces of ply 1335mm x 385mm should be manageable, even if 28 to 30mm thick. I'm putting proper hand width
    lifting handles in, not just a finger pull. Making it the same
    thickness as the old covers means it can sit on the same supports.

    My first section is 500 x 600mm x 19mm and has a single finger pull.
    Apart from the pull being stiff, it does come up quite easily and easy
    to put to one side for access. The larger one ~900 x ~600mm is more
    cumbersome and I wouldn't want it to be twice the weight whilst perched
    on thin supports and performing a near tightrope balance!

    Once the first one is up the others can be slid and removed equally as easy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Mon Feb 17 18:36:14 2025
    On 17/02/2025 14:00, Chris Green wrote:
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 15:34, Chris Green wrote:
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/02/2025 10:11, Marland wrote:
    Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
    Ok, it's the engine hatch covers again. :-)


    So, will a 740mm long by 385mm wide panel be strong enough and stiff >>>>>> enough if made of, say 25mm thick plywood? If it's not going to be >>>>>> stiff enough than I can add something like aluminium angle to stiffen >>>>>> it. However I'd like some sort of idea of whether this is 'obviously' >>>>>> going to be necessary or not.

    I think plywood plus (if necessary) aluminium stiffening is probably >>>>>> the lightest practical (and affordable) material to use but if there's >>>>>> anything else then I'd be interested to hear.

    More expensive but for that job I would use phenolic ply sometimes known as
    buffalo board.
    Often used as flooring in trailers and horse boxes. Has high resistance to
    moisture brought in on footwear , and many varieties have a non slip >>>>> pattern already formed on the surface.

    I have used this in an outside situation and I recommend it's use. It
    also provides a convenient anti-slip surface and is of course
    waterproof. It's not cheap though/

    I also feel the spans the OP requires can be accomplished with 19mm /
    3/4" board without too much deflection. I'm sure my spans are the best >>>> part of 700mm and their narrowest point and happy with the result.

    OP here. How wide are your pieces of ply running across a 700mm span?
    Remember that I'm aiming for strips that will only be 385mm wide, not
    whole 8' x 4' chunks.

    This is a narrowboat application where I would say the width of the
    hatch is >600mm. I haven't measured it.

    One hatch is possibly 1m long, the other 2 probably 500mm each. I found
    it to be substantive, doesn't (perceptively) bow and replaced the
    existing buffalo of the same thickness that was in a poor state.

    Some heavyweights have walked on it without drama!

    OK, thanks, it sounds as if I should be OK then. I think I have some
    scrap pieces of 18mm ply around, I will try out with one of them if I
    can find one big enough.


    However, as noted earlier, I've discovered that the thickness can be
    up to almost 30mm so that should help.

    A 30mm sheet sounds pretty unmanageable as well as expensive. If you are
    concerned then ribs can be added after.

    This is why the existing engine covers are so unmanageable, they are
    made of 30mm material of some sort, probably ply or similar. Lifting
    the larger one (1540mm x 740mm) with its single finger pull is, shall
    we say, difficult.


    You could dispense with the single finger pull and have two
    10mm holes with Tee nuts hammered into the underside of the cover and
    then have a couple of 10mm bolts with suitably sized metal rings
    welded to the head. Then you just screw these two bolts into the
    Tee nuts when ever you need to access the engine cover, which hopefully
    is only rarely.

    I reckon my proposed single pieces of ply 1335mm x 385mm should be manageable, even if 28 to 30mm thick. I'm putting proper hand width
    lifting handles in, not just a finger pull. Making it the same
    thickness as the old covers means it can sit on the same supports.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)