• Goodbye Skype - hello, maybe, Facetime?

    From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 18:25:06 2025
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    Thanks,

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Mon Mar 3 18:44:49 2025
    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:25:06 +0000, Nick Odell wrote:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and I
    spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and friends
    all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from May this
    year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly with seems to
    have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I
    could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to use as
    a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be able
    to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    Thanks,

    Nick

    <https://www.howtogeek.com/738902/how-to-use-facetime-for-windows/>

    Cheers



    Dave R

    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Mon Mar 3 18:48:26 2025
    On 03/03/2025 18:25, Nick Odell wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    I have an iphone but never use facetime.
    That said, there are plenty of "Facetime for Beginners" videos on
    YouTube. e.g.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-aU57ScDws

    if you can ignore the irritating voice.

    Re buying an iphone: I bought a second-hand superseded model.
    i.e. When the latest model was the 14, I bought a used 12[1] but it
    still runs the latest version of iOS and does all (and far more) than I
    need.
    On the whole, Apple seem reasonably good about not forcing obsolescence
    onto earlier models.

    [1] iPhones come in different flavours with more or less memory - priced accordingly (you can't just install an SD card in an iPhone), but the
    basic models should be fine for your porpoises.


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Mon Mar 3 20:03:36 2025
    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    If everyone you might talk to uses an iPhone, Facetime would work. But many countries have a favourite app - eg WhatsApp is very popular. You may find your correspondents all use WA because everyone else they know does. That
    way you aren't that strange person who uses a different app to everyone
    else.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If you use another app like WhatsApp, an Android phone might be option.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    See this table of which iPhone supports which OS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_version_history#Hardware_support

    For security reasons, avoid buying an iPhone which won't run the latest OS.
    You get ~6-7 years of support from launch, so if you buy a version that's a
    few years old you can guess roughly how long of support you'd get.

    Once an iPhone has been dropped from the current OS, there can be limited updates for serious security flaws for a couple of years, but others aren't covered.

    If you don't care about security an unsupported OS may work, but at some
    point older devices will stop working. Apple says: https://support.apple.com/en-us/105088

    "1. You can use FaceTime on any of these devices on Wi-Fi: iPhone 4 or
    later, iPad Pro (all models), iPad 2 or later, iPad mini (all models), and
    iPod touch 4th generation or later (only iPod touch 5th generation or later support FaceTime audio calling).

    2. With a cellular data plan, you can also use FaceTime without Wi-Fi on
    any of these devices: iPhone 4s or later, iPad Pro (all models), and iPad
    (3rd generation or later)."

    which is quite a long way. There were rumours they would drop some older models in 2023, but it seems they didn't.

    (WhatsApp won't work on older than iOS 15, which is a much newer cutoff)

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    Another option for Facetime would be a Mac or an iPad, if those are more
    useful for you.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Mon Mar 3 20:31:04 2025
    On 03/03/2025 06:25 PM, Nick Odell wrote:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    Teletext news reports that MS offers "Teams" (WTMB) as a substitute.

    Facetime is excellent (we use it several times a week with relatives in
    the USA), but it is only available, as I understand it, on Apple
    equipment (whether iPhone, iPad or something like a MacBook).

    There's always FaceBook Messenger of course, for audio or video.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Mar 3 20:33:05 2025
    On 03/03/2025 06:48 PM, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 03/03/2025 18:25, Nick Odell wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    I have an iphone but never use facetime.
    That said, there are plenty of "Facetime for Beginners" videos on
    YouTube. e.g.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-aU57ScDws

    if you can ignore the irritating voice.

    Re buying an iphone: I bought a second-hand superseded model.
    i.e. When the latest model was the 14, I bought a used 12[1] but it
    still runs the latest version of iOS and does all (and far more) than I
    need.
    On the whole, Apple seem reasonably good about not forcing obsolescence
    onto earlier models.

    [1] iPhones come in different flavours with more or less memory - priced accordingly (you can't just install an SD card in an iPhone), but the
    basic models should be fine for your porpoises.

    I think s/h iPads tend to be cheaper still.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to David on Mon Mar 3 20:32:08 2025
    On 03/03/2025 06:44 PM, David wrote:

    <https://www.howtogeek.com/738902/how-to-use-facetime-for-windows/>

    Cheers

    Dave R

    FaceTime on Windows?

    I didn't know that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Mon Mar 3 21:19:31 2025
    Nick Odell wrote:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years

    Spent far too long tonight trying to get a Teams business account to
    speak with a personal Skype account ... they'd do text chat ok, but no
    voice calling, and if one invited the other to a meeting, the other
    couldn't allow them entry from the lobby ... gave up and used Zoom.

    I won't touch WhatsApp or FB Messenger with a bargepole.

    The other person is the only person I know who ought to be
    willing/capable of using Signal, so we'll try that tomorrow ... beats
    paying £1.50/min to call him from O2 ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Mar 3 16:57:20 2025
    On Mon, 3/3/2025 3:32 PM, JNugent wrote:
    On 03/03/2025 06:44 PM, David wrote:

    <https://www.howtogeek.com/738902/how-to-use-facetime-for-windows/>

    Cheers

    Dave R

    FaceTime on Windows?

    I didn't know that.

    The reason it's designed that way, is for authentication.

    If you want elegant, that would be two tomato tins and a piece of cotton string.

    *******

    Really, nothing has changed. The last time there was an earthquake,
    people were wandering around with "how, oh how, can I make a voice call".
    What follows, reminds me a lot of the last time I wrote one of these up.
    Deja Vu all over again, to quote a famous baseball player.

    If you have the time to spend, you can apply your decoder ring to
    articles like this, to see if you can carve a solution out of it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jitsi

    "Jitsi Desktop is no longer actively maintained by the Jitsi team,
    but it is still maintained by the community."

    The first sign of good software, is when it has a status like that.

    https://desktop.jitsi.org/Main/Download.html

    "Jitsi Desktop stable build"

    I hope that has a user manual :-)

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Mar 3 16:59:38 2025
    On Mon, 3/3/2025 3:31 PM, JNugent wrote:


    Teletext news reports that MS offers "Teams" (WTMB) as a substitute.


    The kicker is there is some sort of monthly fee, as well as a PAYG fee.
    And that's what this transition is really about, is rent-seeking.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Mar 3 22:03:48 2025
    Paul wrote:

    JNugent wrote:

    Teletext news reports that MS offers "Teams" (WTMB) as a substitute.

    The kicker is there is some sort of monthly fee, as well as a PAYG fee.
    And that's what this transition is really about, is rent-seeking.
    Pretty sure it can be free, provided you only want to chat/talk/vidcall
    to other teams users, it costs if you want to call actual landline or
    mobile phones.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Tue Mar 4 00:58:39 2025
    On 03/03/2025 18:25, Nick Odell wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    If you install WhatsApp on a phone you can link the windows desktop
    client to it. It then gives one to one and one to many(i.e. group)
    messaging, that will happily let you paste photos and video etc. It will
    also do real time audio and video calls. Generally cross platform. Alas
    owned by Meta these days, but they don't appear to have infected it with
    ads etc so far.

    Teams I find to be rather cumbersome and difficult to use at times - not
    to mention the confusion from several different versions - some paid,
    some free with different limitations etc.

    Zoom is easier the teams IME.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to fred on Tue Mar 4 09:43:29 2025
    On 04/03/2025 09:22, fred wrote:
    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote in news:4orbsjp0o2dvrr19fdd4cu6a1muhr3q1ip@4ax.com:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.


    A bit niche but there's always Telegram, free, secure, private, available
    for phone or desktop and supports video calling:

    https://telegram.org/

    Isnt that run by Russia? Or is that tik-tok?


    --
    To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From fred@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Tue Mar 4 09:22:50 2025
    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote in news:4orbsjp0o2dvrr19fdd4cu6a1muhr3q1ip@4ax.com:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.


    A bit niche but there's always Telegram, free, secure, private, available
    for phone or desktop and supports video calling:

    https://telegram.org/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to David on Tue Mar 4 13:10:33 2025
    On 3 Mar 2025 18:44:49 GMT, David <wibble@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:25:06 +0000, Nick Odell wrote:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and I
    spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and friends
    all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from May this
    year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly with seems to
    have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I
    could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so I'm
    wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to use as
    a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using it
    before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be able
    to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    Thanks,

    Nick

    <https://www.howtogeek.com/738902/how-to-use-facetime-for-windows/>


    I didn't know that before: thank you.

    It might be useful to set that up on a Windows machine anyway but I
    think the main downside is that it seems you can't initiate calls from
    outside the Appleosphere.

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Mar 4 13:14:29 2025
    On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 18:48:26 +0000, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 03/03/2025 18:25, Nick Odell wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    I have an iphone but never use facetime.
    That said, there are plenty of "Facetime for Beginners" videos on
    YouTube. e.g.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-aU57ScDws

    if you can ignore the irritating voice.

    Re buying an iphone: I bought a second-hand superseded model.
    i.e. When the latest model was the 14, I bought a used 12[1] but it
    still runs the latest version of iOS and does all (and far more) than I
    need.
    On the whole, Apple seem reasonably good about not forcing obsolescence
    onto earlier models.

    [1] iPhones come in different flavours with more or less memory - priced >accordingly (you can't just install an SD card in an iPhone), but the
    basic models should be fine for your porpoises.

    Ta for that. I think the latest version is 16 but your 12 is still
    running along okay, yes?

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 4 13:15:20 2025
    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 20:33:05 +0000, JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com>
    wrote:

    On 03/03/2025 06:48 PM, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 03/03/2025 18:25, Nick Odell wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    I have an iphone but never use facetime.
    That said, there are plenty of "Facetime for Beginners" videos on
    YouTube. e.g.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-aU57ScDws

    if you can ignore the irritating voice.

    Re buying an iphone: I bought a second-hand superseded model.
    i.e. When the latest model was the 14, I bought a used 12[1] but it
    still runs the latest version of iOS and does all (and far more) than I
    need.
    On the whole, Apple seem reasonably good about not forcing obsolescence
    onto earlier models.

    [1] iPhones come in different flavours with more or less memory - priced
    accordingly (you can't just install an SD card in an iPhone), but the
    basic models should be fine for your porpoises.

    I think s/h iPads tend to be cheaper still.

    I'm not really a tablet kindova guy. But thanks anyway.

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk on Tue Mar 4 13:43:56 2025
    On 03 Mar 2025 20:03:36 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    If everyone you might talk to uses an iPhone, Facetime would work. But many >countries have a favourite app - eg WhatsApp is very popular. You may find >your correspondents all use WA because everyone else they know does. That >way you aren't that strange person who uses a different app to everyone
    else.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If you use another app like WhatsApp, an Android phone might be option.


    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    See this table of which iPhone supports which OS: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_version_history#Hardware_support

    For security reasons, avoid buying an iPhone which won't run the latest OS. >You get ~6-7 years of support from launch, so if you buy a version that's a >few years old you can guess roughly how long of support you'd get.

    Once an iPhone has been dropped from the current OS, there can be limited >updates for serious security flaws for a couple of years, but others aren't >covered.

    If you don't care about security an unsupported OS may work, but at some >point older devices will stop working. Apple says: >https://support.apple.com/en-us/105088

    "1. You can use FaceTime on any of these devices on Wi-Fi: iPhone 4 or >later, iPad Pro (all models), iPad 2 or later, iPad mini (all models), and >iPod touch 4th generation or later (only iPod touch 5th generation or later >support FaceTime audio calling).

    2. With a cellular data plan, you can also use FaceTime without Wi-Fi on
    any of these devices: iPhone 4s or later, iPad Pro (all models), and iPad >(3rd generation or later)."

    which is quite a long way. There were rumours they would drop some older >models in 2023, but it seems they didn't.

    (WhatsApp won't work on older than iOS 15, which is a much newer cutoff)

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    I've made my feelings about WhatsApp better known elsewhere in this
    thread but thanks for all the detail about iPhones - it's really
    useful.

    Another option for Facetime would be a Mac or an iPad, if those are more >useful for you.

    That's another consideration. (The Mac, not the iPad) At some point in
    the not-too-distant future I'll have to upgrade my hardware if I want
    to continue using banking stuff etc and switching to a Mac could be
    the way to go to solve both issues.

    But, with the exception of the state-of-the-art 386DX I once had built
    for me at an extortionate cost, I've tended to buy new, cheaper, lower
    spec machines because I just don't need massive capability for the
    things that I do. Buying a new Mac at an eye-watering price is really
    not for me but I suppose the trick is to know how old is too old with
    those machines and buy one which will still function properly for a
    while and still get essential updates etc.

    Thanks

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 4 13:43:56 2025
    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 20:31:04 +0000, JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com>
    wrote:

    On 03/03/2025 06:25 PM, Nick Odell wrote:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    Teletext news reports that MS offers "Teams" (WTMB) as a substitute.

    Facetime is excellent (we use it several times a week with relatives in
    the USA), but it is only available, as I understand it, on Apple
    equipment (whether iPhone, iPad or something like a MacBook).

    Apart from what Paul has said about Teams subscriptions etc, I don't
    think anybody I know uses it so everybody else would have to switch
    too.


    There's always FaceBook Messenger of course, for audio or video.

    Being assimilated into the Zuckersphere is a non-negotiable no-no,
    thanks.

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to fred on Tue Mar 4 13:43:56 2025
    On Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:22:50 GMT, fred <not@for.mail> wrote:

    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote in >news:4orbsjp0o2dvrr19fdd4cu6a1muhr3q1ip@4ax.com:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.


    A bit niche but there's always Telegram, free, secure, private, available
    for phone or desktop and supports video calling:

    https://telegram.org/

    That might be fun to try but, like the "Teams" thing, none of my
    regular contacts use it AFAIK and my aim is to try and move from Skype
    to something the others already use.

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Tue Mar 4 18:54:20 2025
    On 04/03/2025 13:14, Nick Odell wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 18:48:26 +0000, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 03/03/2025 18:25, Nick Odell wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    If it wasn't already obvious from what I've written, I know nothing
    about Apple. Will any old iPhone run Facetime? If not, what's the
    minimum generation iPhone I ought to be looking for for - say - at
    least a couple of years use and how long could I expect to keep using
    it before Apple deprecates it?

    I'm really not bothered about anything else an iPhone can or can't do.
    All my other cameras and comms stuff are working fine. Perhaps in time
    I'll become fascinated by Apple stuff but for now I just want to be
    able to chat with Facetime.

    All advice welcome.

    I have an iphone but never use facetime.
    That said, there are plenty of "Facetime for Beginners" videos on
    YouTube. e.g.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-aU57ScDws

    if you can ignore the irritating voice.

    Re buying an iphone: I bought a second-hand superseded model.
    i.e. When the latest model was the 14, I bought a used 12[1] but it
    still runs the latest version of iOS and does all (and far more) than I
    need.
    On the whole, Apple seem reasonably good about not forcing obsolescence
    onto earlier models.

    [1] iPhones come in different flavours with more or less memory - priced
    accordingly (you can't just install an SD card in an iPhone), but the
    basic models should be fine for your porpoises.

    Ta for that. I think the latest version is 16 but your 12 is still
    running along okay, yes?

    Yes. Everything back to the model 11 can run iOS 18 (also the XS & XR
    models).
    Back when I used an android phone, it went 'obsolete' (i.e. no further
    updates available for it) after quite a short timescale. Apple seem
    better in that regard.


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From fred@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Tue Mar 4 19:19:39 2025
    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote in news:un0esj9oqcgempi3le9573747srjob135n@4ax.com:

    On Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:22:50 GMT, fred <not@for.mail> wrote:


    A bit niche but there's always Telegram, free, secure, private,
    available for phone or desktop and supports video calling:

    https://telegram.org/

    That might be fun to try but, like the "Teams" thing, none of my
    regular contacts use it AFAIK and my aim is to try and move from Skype
    to something the others already use.


    Yeah, with you on that but despite some bad press t'gram is a nice way to
    avoid the big boys plus no ads and no tracking. A nice light, inobtrusive application. Maybe punt it to your contacts although I know many might say, 'not another app!'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Tue Mar 4 20:15:20 2025
    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    But, with the exception of the state-of-the-art 386DX I once had built
    for me at an extortionate cost, I've tended to buy new, cheaper, lower
    spec machines because I just don't need massive capability for the
    things that I do. Buying a new Mac at an eye-watering price is really
    not for me but I suppose the trick is to know how old is too old with
    those machines and buy one which will still function properly for a
    while and still get essential updates etc.

    If a desktop is ok, the M4 Mac Mini at £599 (£499 if you know anyone who can get the education discount) is a very good deal. You only get 256GB of
    storage in the base model but there are upgrades (or external SSDs). 16GB of RAM should mean it lasts a good long while, and being new you get the
    longest support lifetime.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Wed Mar 5 01:44:44 2025
    On 04/03/2025 13:43, Nick Odell wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 21:19:31 +0000, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Nick Odell wrote:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years

    Spent far too long tonight trying to get a Teams business account to
    speak with a personal Skype account ... they'd do text chat ok, but no
    voice calling, and if one invited the other to a meeting, the other
    couldn't allow them entry from the lobby ... gave up and used Zoom.

    I won't touch WhatsApp or FB Messenger with a bargepole.
    <snip>
    To John and Andy:

    Mark Zuckerberg and I had a big falling out in 2016 (okay so
    Zuckerberg won't have even noticed, but I did.) So I won't be using
    Meta products anytime soon. But thanks for mentioning them anyway.

    Fairy snuff... worth noting that whatsapp was not originally a meta
    product, they bought it.

    You could try Signal - developed by the original developer of whatsapp
    as a privacy focussed messaging app:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Foundation




    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 6 11:58:55 2025
    On 6 Mar 2025 at 11:48:10 GMT, "Colin Macleod" <user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted:

    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    You could try Signal - developed by the original developer of whatsapp
    as a privacy focussed messaging app:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Foundation

    I too won't use any Meta apps. I use Signal, it works fine.

    I need to start looking at Signal too.
    It seems ridiculous that there's no interoperable standard for video
    calling as there is for phone calls, email, or even "snail" mail.

    Giggle begs to differ:

    RFC 3551:
    This RFC defines the RTP profile for audio and video conferences with minimal control, which is a foundational document for real-time multimedia conferencing.

    RFC 7742:
    This RFC outlines WebRTC video processing and codec requirements, providing guidance for implementing video functionality in web browsers and
    applications.

    RFC 4353:
    This RFC describes a framework for conferencing with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), which is a signaling protocol used to set up and manage multimedia sessions.

    RFC 7478:
    This RFC describes Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) use cases and requirements, which is a project for real-time communication over the web.

    and others.

    Whether any of these are actually used, I know not.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Macleod@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 6 11:48:10 2025
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted:

    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    You could try Signal - developed by the original developer of whatsapp
    as a privacy focussed messaging app:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Foundation


    I too won't use any Meta apps. I use Signal, it works fine.

    I need to start looking at Signal too.
    It seems ridiculous that there's no interoperable standard for video
    calling as there is for phone calls, email, or even "snail" mail.

    --
    Colin Macleod ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ https://cmacleod.me.uk

    Please rate your Usenet experience today: :-D :-) :-/ :-( :-O

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Thu Mar 6 12:06:43 2025
    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2025 at 11:48:10 GMT, "Colin Macleod" <user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid>
    wrote:

    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted:

    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    You could try Signal - developed by the original developer of whatsapp >>> as a privacy focussed messaging app:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Foundation

    I too won't use any Meta apps. I use Signal, it works fine.

    I need to start looking at Signal too.
    It seems ridiculous that there's no interoperable standard for video calling as there is for phone calls, email, or even "snail" mail.

    Giggle begs to differ:

    RFC 3551:
    This RFC defines the RTP profile for audio and video conferences with minimal control, which is a foundational document for real-time multimedia conferencing.

    RFC 7742:
    This RFC outlines WebRTC video processing and codec requirements, providing guidance for implementing video functionality in web browsers and applications.

    RFC 4353:
    This RFC describes a framework for conferencing with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), which is a signaling protocol used to set up and manage multimedia sessions.

    RFC 7478:
    This RFC describes Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) use cases and requirements, which is a project for real-time communication over the web.

    and others.

    Whether any of these are actually used, I know not.

    WebRTC is what powers most web-based video chat, and why there are so many different video chat apps because it's easy to spin up a new one.
    (also app-based ones may use WebRTC in the backend for compatibility with
    their web versions)

    What it doesn't do is make an interoperable network.

    By analogy, webRTC is like standardising how to put a letter in an envelope
    but you need a General Post Office type organisation to decide on addresses
    and stamps to allow people to communicate. Effectively what's happened here
    is every startup builds their own GPO and you need to be registered with each one to send or receive letters on their platform. It's not in their
    business interest to collaborate with other providers with competing
    platforms.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 6 17:01:52 2025
    On 6 Mar 2025 at 12:06:43 GMT, "Theo" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2025 at 11:48:10 GMT, "Colin Macleod" <user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid>
    wrote:

    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted:

    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    You could try Signal - developed by the original developer of whatsapp >>>>> as a privacy focussed messaging app:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Foundation

    I too won't use any Meta apps. I use Signal, it works fine.

    I need to start looking at Signal too.
    It seems ridiculous that there's no interoperable standard for video
    calling as there is for phone calls, email, or even "snail" mail.

    Giggle begs to differ:

    RFC 3551:
    This RFC defines the RTP profile for audio and video conferences with minimal
    control, which is a foundational document for real-time multimedia
    conferencing.

    RFC 7742:
    This RFC outlines WebRTC video processing and codec requirements, providing >> guidance for implementing video functionality in web browsers and
    applications.

    RFC 4353:
    This RFC describes a framework for conferencing with the Session Initiation >> Protocol (SIP), which is a signaling protocol used to set up and manage
    multimedia sessions.

    RFC 7478:
    This RFC describes Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) use cases and
    requirements, which is a project for real-time communication over the web. >>
    and others.

    Whether any of these are actually used, I know not.

    WebRTC is what powers most web-based video chat, and why there are so many different video chat apps because it's easy to spin up a new one.
    (also app-based ones may use WebRTC in the backend for compatibility with their web versions)

    What it doesn't do is make an interoperable network.

    By analogy, webRTC is like standardising how to put a letter in an envelope but you need a General Post Office type organisation to decide on addresses and stamps to allow people to communicate. Effectively what's happened here is every startup builds their own GPO and you need to be registered with each one to send or receive letters on their platform. It's not in their
    business interest to collaborate with other providers with competing platforms.

    Yes. I suppose the difference with snail mail is that there is a monopoly
    (more or less) of that in each country. So those organisations can agree to interoperate.


    --
    Lady Astor: "If you were my husband I'd give you poison."
    Churchill: "If you were my wife, I'd drink it."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Thu Mar 6 18:10:09 2025
    Tim Streater wrote:

    I suppose the difference with snail mail is that there is a monopoly
    (more or less) of that in each country. So those organisations can agree to interoperate.

    Denmark is halting letter delivery by the end of the year ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu Mar 6 19:06:59 2025
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Tim Streater wrote:

    I suppose the difference with snail mail is that there is a monopoly
    (more or less) of that in each country. So those organisations can agree to interoperate.

    Denmark is halting letter delivery by the end of the year ...

    "While it will still be possible to send letters with other companies in future, the options at the current time are narrow. There is currently no option outside of PostNord for sending letters internationally." https://www.thelocal.dk/20250306/is-it-possible-to-send-letters-in-denmark-without-postnord

    So just as broken as chat app interoperability...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Thu Mar 6 19:09:52 2025
    On 06/03/2025 17:01, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2025 at 12:06:43 GMT, "Theo" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2025 at 11:48:10 GMT, "Colin Macleod" <user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid>
    wrote:

    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted:

    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

    You could try Signal - developed by the original developer of whatsapp >>>>>> as a privacy focussed messaging app:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Foundation

    I too won't use any Meta apps. I use Signal, it works fine.

    I need to start looking at Signal too.
    It seems ridiculous that there's no interoperable standard for video
    calling as there is for phone calls, email, or even "snail" mail.

    Giggle begs to differ:

    RFC 3551:
    This RFC defines the RTP profile for audio and video conferences with minimal
    control, which is a foundational document for real-time multimedia
    conferencing.

    RFC 7742:
    This RFC outlines WebRTC video processing and codec requirements, providing >>> guidance for implementing video functionality in web browsers and
    applications.

    RFC 4353:
    This RFC describes a framework for conferencing with the Session Initiation >>> Protocol (SIP), which is a signaling protocol used to set up and manage
    multimedia sessions.

    RFC 7478:
    This RFC describes Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) use cases and
    requirements, which is a project for real-time communication over the web. >>>
    and others.

    Whether any of these are actually used, I know not.

    WebRTC is what powers most web-based video chat, and why there are so many >> different video chat apps because it's easy to spin up a new one.
    (also app-based ones may use WebRTC in the backend for compatibility with
    their web versions)

    What it doesn't do is make an interoperable network.

    By analogy, webRTC is like standardising how to put a letter in an envelope >> but you need a General Post Office type organisation to decide on addresses >> and stamps to allow people to communicate. Effectively what's happened here >> is every startup builds their own GPO and you need to be registered with each
    one to send or receive letters on their platform. It's not in their
    business interest to collaborate with other providers with competing
    platforms.

    Yes. I suppose the difference with snail mail is that there is a monopoly (more or less) of that in each country. So those organisations can agree to interoperate.


    Once everyone is VOIP, the monopoly vanishes. You could set up free SIP
    servers in a sort of Internet way to act as DNS servers do today. To
    indicate where a given telephone number is to be found this minute...

    The PSTN network becomes completely redundant

    In a way that's where Whatsapp is right now. The problem is someone owns it

    IPV6 could in theory give every telephone in the world a unique IP
    address : to make a call you look up a global IPV6 dns system that tells
    you what IP address is is.


    --
    "When one man dies it's a tragedy. When thousands die it's statistics."

    Josef Stalin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 6 22:19:38 2025
    On 6 Mar 2025 at 19:06:59 GMT, "Theo" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Tim Streater wrote:

    I suppose the difference with snail mail is that there is a monopoly
    (more or less) of that in each country. So those organisations can agree to >>> interoperate.

    Denmark is halting letter delivery by the end of the year ...

    "While it will still be possible to send letters with other companies in future, the options at the current time are narrow. There is currently no option outside of PostNord for sending letters internationally." https://www.thelocal.dk/20250306/is-it-possible-to-send-letters-in-denmark-without-postnord

    So just as broken as chat app interoperability...

    Only because they are unable to adapt to the 90% drop in letter usage in the last 25 years.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From brian@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Fri Mar 7 09:04:29 2025
    In message <vqcru0$33ndr$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Once everyone is VOIP, the monopoly vanishes. You could set up free SIP >servers in a sort of Internet way to act as DNS servers do today. To >indicate where a given telephone number is to be found this minute...

    The PSTN network becomes completely redundant

    In a way that's where Whatsapp is right now. The problem is someone owns it

    IPV6 could in theory give every telephone in the world a unique IP
    address : to make a call you look up a global IPV6 dns system that
    tells you what IP address is is.



    I mentioned cuseeme. I had a fixed IP in the 90's and my pals/relatives
    on cuseeme had it in their directories. Dynamic IPs were a pain, but
    there's ways round that.

    Brian
    --
    Brian Howie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From brian@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 7 08:34:13 2025
    In message <KDzxP.311502$Xxe7.13153@fx07.ams4>, fred <not@for.mail>
    writes
    Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote in >news:4orbsjp0o2dvrr19fdd4cu6a1muhr3q1ip@4ax.com:

    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.


    A bit niche but there's always Telegram, free, secure, private, available
    for phone or desktop and supports video calling:

    https://telegram.org/


    I used cuseeme back in the 90s. I've still got it here and it still
    seems to run . The video settings don't work and all the reflectors
    have gone, but peer to peer is still possible.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CU-SeeMe

    Brian
    --
    Brian Howie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bernard Peek@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Sat Mar 8 20:31:24 2025
    On 2025-03-03, Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    I've just installed Viber as a Skype replacement. I haven't tried it out
    yet.


    --
    Bernard Peek
    bap@shrdlu.com
    Wigan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to Bernard Peek on Sun Mar 9 21:58:25 2025
    On 8 Mar 2025 20:31:24 GMT, Bernard Peek <bap@shrdlu.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-03, Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    Don't mock: Skype has been very useful to me for many, many years and
    I spend several hours each week using Skype to talk to family and
    friends all over the world. But it's being retired by Microsoft from
    May this year and I need a replacement. Everybody I chat regularly
    with seems to have an Apple device now so I'm wondering about getting
    something I could use to talk to them with Facetime.

    I'm perfectly happy with the computers and phones I currently use so
    I'm wondering about getting a cheap(ish) second hand iPhone purely to
    use as a Facetime device.

    I've just installed Viber as a Skype replacement. I haven't tried it out
    yet.

    Today I have been mostly trying to register an Apple account and get
    Facetime working on an old iPhone my son has lent me to try this out.

    It's working mostly - I still have a lot to learn.

    Viber looks interesting. As far as I can tell from what I read, it
    won't let me make video calls from Viber to people on other VoiP
    services (I think it's only Viber to Viber) but it will let me make
    cheap paid-for calls to regular phone numbers. So a combination of
    Viber and Facetime ought to replace the services that I have been
    using from Skype

    Thanks,

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)