• Wood buring stove, chimney conversion

    From N_Cook@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 15 19:06:28 2025
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy innocent neighbours.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to diverse@tcp.co.uk on Sat Mar 15 20:15:02 2025
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Mar 15 21:20:14 2025
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim

    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Mar 15 21:16:22 2025
    On 15/03/2025 20:15, charles wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    Which is actually a bit smaller diameter/area than the chimneypot that seemingly did not worry about rain ingress, illogical as Spock would say.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 15 21:28:28 2025
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat >>> diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy >>> innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to diverse@tcp.co.uk on Sat Mar 15 21:47:07 2025
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of >>>> the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat >>>> diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy >>>> innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you burning? I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Tim

    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 15 22:02:32 2025
    On 15/03/2025 21:28, N_Cook wrote:



    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension


    A mesh doesn't stop a nest being made on top of it


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim the Geordie@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Sun Mar 16 00:53:09 2025
    On 16/03/2025 00:18, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough >>>>>> momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-
    side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending
    somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately >>>>>> annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Since all smoke is carcinogenic, and they produce as much CO2 as coal, I
    cannot see the logic of allowing wood burners anyhow.
    PS. I can detect the smell of them whenever the wind is in the wrong
    direction.

    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 00:18:00 2025
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough >>>>> momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of >>>>> the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat >>>>> diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy >>>>> innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you burning? I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room. That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 01:27:40 2025
    On 15/03/2025 19:06, N_Cook wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy innocent neighbours.

    It stops the jackdaws falling down...
    --
    “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the
    urge to rule it.â€
    – H. L. Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Sun Mar 16 08:02:07 2025
    On 16/03/2025 00:53, Jim the Geordie wrote:

    Since all smoke is carcinogenic, and they produce as much CO2 as coal, I cannot see the logic of allowing wood burners anyhow.
    PS. I can detect the smell of them whenever the wind is in the wrong direction.


    You will find a lot of wood burners in rural areas that don't have mains
    gas.


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marland@21:1/5 to junk@admac.myzen.co.uk on Sun Mar 16 08:27:20 2025
    alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 00:53, Jim the Geordie wrote:

    Since all smoke is carcinogenic, and they produce as much CO2 as coal, I
    cannot see the logic of allowing wood burners anyhow.
    PS. I can detect the smell of them whenever the wind is in the wrong
    direction.


    You will find a lot of wood burners in rural areas that don't have mains
    gas.


    And their owners often have a source of firewood for free or very little
    cost which offsets the occasions they may have to use some electric for
    heating ,trouble is they have also become
    a fashion accessory so many have been installed because they look nice in
    town and city houses where the smoke annoys people rather than pigeons.
    The OP IIRC lives in Southampton so would fall into that category,OTOH the smell of the smoke may dilute the odour from the sewage works.

    GH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 09:35:10 2025
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough >>>>> momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of >>>>> the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat >>>>> diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy >>>>> innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you burning? I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Tim


    Perhaps a psychological response, because on the other hand, the smell
    of charcoal production in a woodland setting , is one of my favorite
    smells. Perhaps its the intensity of the smell also.
    Thiking, the smell of Gitanes or Galloise fag smoke , wafting downwind
    at a distance is quite pleasant, but being close to somone smoking one
    I'd find unpleasant.



    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Sun Mar 16 09:44:13 2025
    On 16/03/2025 00:53, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 00:18, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with
    enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-
    side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending
    somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to
    deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof >>>> fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts >>>> of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you
    burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room. That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Since all smoke is carcinogenic, and they produce as much CO2 as coal, I cannot see the logic of allowing wood burners anyhow.
    PS. I can detect the smell of them whenever the wind is in the wrong direction.


    There is local to me a sort of citizen science project over perhaps 10
    sites on house walls, to monitor traffic pollution. 8 raspberry pi
    particulate detectors per box, polled and transmitted data. All they
    seem to pick up is barbecue, bonfire and woodburner emissions.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From No mail@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Sun Mar 16 10:45:49 2025
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough >>>>>> momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending
    somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately >>>>>> annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimW@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 10:52:51 2025
    On 15/03/2025 22:02, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:28, N_Cook wrote:



    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of
    thatched-roof fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer
    field-fire-raising sorts of holes dimension


    A mesh doesn't stop a nest being made on top of it


    And you will want a mesh small enough to stop a swarm of bees going down
    the chimeny. That can be a right pain.
    TW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to No mail on Sun Mar 16 11:10:24 2025
    On 16/03/2025 10:45, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with
    enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending
    somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to
    deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof >>>> fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts >>>> of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you
    burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room. That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.


    I thought the traditional trick, starting from a cold chimney, was to
    light a series of single sheets of newspaper before setting the nested newspaper and kindling alight.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to diverse@tcp.co.uk on Sun Mar 16 11:57:57 2025
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:45, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with >>>>>>>> enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending >>>>>>>> somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to
    deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof >>>>> fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts >>>>> of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you
    burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room. That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.


    I thought the traditional trick, starting from a cold chimney, was to
    light a series of single sheets of newspaper before setting the nested newspaper and kindling alight.


    We use a couple of the waxed wood shavings type firefighters. Possibly a
    bit profligate but they seem to provide enough heat to get a good updraught going straight away. We never have smoke coming back out of our vents.

    Tim

    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to No mail on Sun Mar 16 12:39:00 2025
    No mail <nomail@aolbin.com> wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.

    Surely it will simply be refilled with equally cold air from outside
    won't it?

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Sun Mar 16 12:45:49 2025
    On 16 Mar 2025 at 00:53:09 GMT, Jim the Geordie wrote:

    On 16/03/2025 00:18, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough >>>>>>> momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-
    side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending
    somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately >>>>>>> annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof >>>> fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts >>>> of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you burning? >>> I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room. That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Since all smoke is carcinogenic, and they produce as much CO2 as coal, I cannot see the logic of allowing wood burners anyhow.
    PS. I can detect the smell of them whenever the wind is in the wrong direction.

    One of the reasons I recently moved. Pretty much every house in the upper-middle class terraced street had one of the things. When they were going full tilt I had trouble breathing.

    Almost ironically, I find the fumes difficult to deal with in ski resorts too.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ajh@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 13:03:27 2025
    On 16/03/2025 09:44, N_Cook wrote:

    There is local to me a sort of citizen science project over perhaps 10
    sites on house walls, to monitor traffic pollution. 8 raspberry pi particulate detectors per box, polled and transmitted data. All they
    seem to pick up is barbecue, bonfire and woodburner emissions.

    This makes sense as most cars have catalytic exhausts and many diesels
    have particulate traps and recently adblue so one would expect to see
    some benefit.

    What would interest me is how these monitors differentiate the transport combustion particulates from biomass burning.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From No mail@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Sun Mar 16 13:25:59 2025
    Chris Green wrote:
    No mail <nomail@aolbin.com> wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.

    Surely it will simply be refilled with equally cold air from outside
    won't it?

    Initially, that's what I thought ... but it works. I assume the air in
    the flue cools and falls during the night so it's colder than the
    outside air.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From No mail@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 13:27:19 2025
    N_Cook wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:45, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with >>>>>>>> enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending >>>>>>>> somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to
    deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of
    thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising
    sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you
    burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.


    I thought the traditional trick, starting from a cold chimney, was to
    light a series of single sheets of newspaper before setting the nested newspaper and kindling alight.

    Yes, but after a very cold night that still caused smoke sometimes.
    Opening the door for a while seems to get rid of the problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Sun Mar 16 13:51:05 2025
    On 16/03/2025 00:18, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough >>>>>> momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending
    somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately >>>>>> annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.



    ? Warm up the chimney with an electric hot air heat gun for a
    few minutes before lighting the fire.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 17:25:53 2025
    On 16/03/2025 11:10, N_Cook wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:45, No mail wrote:


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.


    I thought the traditional trick, starting from a cold chimney, was to
    light a series of single sheets of newspaper before setting the nested newspaper and kindling alight.


    Correct. The last thing you want is a cold downward draft that you
    can/will get if the fire has been out for a few days during a cold spell.

    The trick is to get newspaper alight and the thinnest of kindling and
    leave the door of a stove open. Once you get enough open flame going to
    the bottom of the chimney you will start getting an upward draw and then
    you can start the fire properly. In my experience you don't have to do
    this unless the inside of the chimney has got too cold over a period of
    a few days without a fire.


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to No mail on Sun Mar 16 18:25:12 2025
    On 16/03/2025 13:25, No mail wrote:
    Chris Green wrote:
    No mail <nomail@aolbin.com> wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the >>>> room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.

    Surely it will simply be refilled with equally cold air from outside
    won't it?

    Initially, that's what I thought ... but it works. I assume the air in
    the flue cools and falls during the night so it's colder than the
    outside air.

    No it won't - Chris Green is right. The air inside the flu/chimney will /always/ be warmer than that outside. It will be warmer because the
    house is warmer. If it works at all it's much more likely that opening
    the stove door allows the "plug" of cold air to be pushed upwards
    slightly by the warmer air in the stove and its flu in the room. As
    noted above, a few sheets of paper burning fiercely will push the cold
    air up the flu much more quickly.

    I've now run out of logs and am using Phurnacite left by the previous
    owner. I don't like it at all; I can see why it was left...

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Sun Mar 16 19:57:45 2025
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 13:25, No mail wrote:
    Chris Green wrote:
    No mail <nomail@aolbin.com> wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the >>>> room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.

    Surely it will simply be refilled with equally cold air from outside
    won't it?

    Initially, that's what I thought ... but it works. I assume the air in
    the flue cools and falls during the night so it's colder than the
    outside air.

    No it won't - Chris Green is right. The air inside the flu/chimney will /always/ be warmer than that outside. It will be warmer because the
    house is warmer. If it works at all it's much more likely that opening
    the stove door allows the "plug" of cold air to be pushed upwards
    slightly by the warmer air in the stove and its flu in the room. As
    noted above, a few sheets of paper burning fiercely will push the cold
    air up the flu much more quickly.

    I've now run out of logs and am using Phurnacite left by the previous
    owner. I don't like it at all; I can see why it was left...

    Chris Green here. Our solution is an electric fan on the top of the
    flue. When our stove was installed we knew that the height of the
    flue was marginal in relation to how close it was to the roof ridge
    etc. It was OK 90% of the time but there were certain North winds
    that made it extremely difficult to light the stove even though once
    going ans hot it was OK.

    So we bought a 'top of the flue' electric fan and it is **magic**, not
    only does ti solve the north wind problem, it makes lighting the stove
    an absolute doddle.

    (North, north, a random selection seemed reasonable!)

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 20:34:27 2025
    On 16/03/2025 11:10, N_Cook wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:45, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with >>>>>>>> enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending >>>>>>>> somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to
    deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of
    thatched-roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising
    sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you
    burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.


    I thought the traditional trick, starting from a cold chimney, was to
    light a series of single sheets of newspaper before setting the nested newspaper and kindling alight.

    Yes.

    An insulated chimney helps enormously as well

    --
    There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
    returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

    Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 20:31:45 2025
    On 16/03/2025 09:44, N_Cook wrote:
    Since all smoke is carcinogenic, and they produce as much CO2 as coal, I
    cannot see the logic of allowing wood burners anyhow.
    PS. I can detect the smell of them whenever the wind is in the wrong
    direction.


    There is local to me a sort of citizen science project over perhaps 10
    sites on house walls, to monitor traffic pollution. 8 raspberry pi particulate detectors per box, polled and transmitted data. All they
    seem to pick up is barbecue, bonfire and woodburner emissions.

    But try taxing THAT.

    I mean Vegans produce ten times more methane than meat eaters.
    WE should therefore shoot them.

    --
    “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the
    urge to rule it.â€
    – H. L. Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to ajh on Sun Mar 16 20:33:41 2025
    On 16/03/2025 13:03, ajh wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 09:44, N_Cook wrote:

    There is local to me a sort of citizen science project over perhaps 10
    sites on house walls, to monitor traffic pollution. 8 raspberry pi
    particulate detectors per box, polled and transmitted data. All they
    seem to pick up is barbecue, bonfire and woodburner emissions.

    This makes sense as most cars have catalytic exhausts and many diesels
    have particulate traps and recently adblue so one would expect to see
    some benefit.

    What would interest me is how these monitors differentiate the transport combustion particulates from biomass burning.

    Can't in fact be done
    I have an air purifier by my bed. Cooking bacon in the downstairs
    kitchen always triggers it. And often triggers the smoke alarms

    Worrying about pollution kills more people
    --
    “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the
    urge to rule it.â€
    – H. L. Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 09:09:38 2025
    On 15/03/2025 19:06, N_Cook wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy innocent neighbours.


    In summary the shallow cone of a cap must be just for annoying neighbours.
    The most recent conversion was to a sort of local landmark.
    A spinning mirror ball of a sphere of stainless steel a top a chimney,
    with anngled flutes so acted like a kids windmill. I assume this was to
    stop rain entry, except for the rain falling at just the right time and
    angle to pass one of the slits, all other rain would be spun off. Very
    rarely would it be seen stationary.
    Adding a spin ,vortex, to vertically emerging smoke would, if anything ,
    help clearing the roof surface wind. Now its replaced with one of these annoying caps

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marland@21:1/5 to diverse@tcp.co.uk on Mon Mar 17 10:24:26 2025
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 19:06, N_Cook wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.


    In summary the shallow cone of a cap must be just for annoying neighbours. The most recent conversion was to a sort of local landmark.
    A spinning mirror ball of a sphere of stainless steel a top a chimney,
    with anngled flutes so acted like a kids windmill. I assume this was to
    stop rain entry, except for the rain falling at just the right time and
    angle to pass one of the slits, all other rain would be spun off. Very
    rarely would it be seen stationary.
    Adding a spin ,vortex, to vertically emerging smoke would, if anything ,
    help clearing the roof surface wind. Now its replaced with one of these annoying caps


    The primary purpose of spinning cowls is to increase draught rather than
    stop rain entry though that is another benefit.

    GH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to Marland on Mon Mar 17 14:20:49 2025
    On 17/03/2025 10:24, Marland wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 19:06, N_Cook wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat >>> diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy >>> innocent neighbours.


    In summary the shallow cone of a cap must be just for annoying neighbours. >> The most recent conversion was to a sort of local landmark.
    A spinning mirror ball of a sphere of stainless steel a top a chimney,
    with anngled flutes so acted like a kids windmill. I assume this was to
    stop rain entry, except for the rain falling at just the right time and
    angle to pass one of the slits, all other rain would be spun off. Very
    rarely would it be seen stationary.
    Adding a spin ,vortex, to vertically emerging smoke would, if anything ,
    help clearing the roof surface wind. Now its replaced with one of these
    annoying caps


    The primary purpose of spinning cowls is to increase draught rather than
    stop rain entry though that is another benefit.

    GH




    Which begs the question why replace the spinning cowl with a shallow
    cone dome cap?
    As the spinner must spin due to setting up a pressure difference at each "blade" like multiple wing aerofoils, perhaps it creats too much
    updraught in high wind. Surely then with a mainly enclosed "approved"
    log burner you just restrict air intake at the input air regulator.
    Even if the rain was vertical , with no gutter to these stupid caps and
    no prevailing wind leeside "gargoyle", rain would fall into the
    chimneypot as the liner is smaller than the pot. For the usual angled
    rain it would just enter the 4 inch or so gap between cap and pot rim.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marland@21:1/5 to diverse@tcp.co.uk on Mon Mar 17 15:25:23 2025
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 10:24, Marland wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 19:06, N_Cook wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top
    level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the lee-side of >>>> the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending somewhat >>>> diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to deliberately annoy >>>> innocent neighbours.


    In summary the shallow cone of a cap must be just for annoying neighbours. >>> The most recent conversion was to a sort of local landmark.
    A spinning mirror ball of a sphere of stainless steel a top a chimney,
    with anngled flutes so acted like a kids windmill. I assume this was to
    stop rain entry, except for the rain falling at just the right time and
    angle to pass one of the slits, all other rain would be spun off. Very
    rarely would it be seen stationary.
    Adding a spin ,vortex, to vertically emerging smoke would, if anything , >>> help clearing the roof surface wind. Now its replaced with one of these
    annoying caps


    The primary purpose of spinning cowls is to increase draught rather than
    stop rain entry though that is another benefit.

    GH




    Which begs the question why replace the spinning cowl with a shallow
    cone dome cap?

    Because being a moving part they wear out ?

    As the spinner must spin due to setting up a pressure difference at each "blade" like multiple wing aerofoils, perhaps it creats too much
    updraught in high wind. Surely then with a mainly enclosed "approved"
    log burner you just restrict air intake at the input air regulator.
    Even if the rain was vertical , with no gutter to these stupid caps and
    no prevailing wind leeside "gargoyle", rain would fall into the
    chimneypot as the liner is smaller than the pot. For the usual angled
    rain it would just enter the 4 inch or so gap between cap and pot rim.

    With 10’s of thousands of simple caps out there in use that seem to do the job for most I think you are exaggerating the problem, occasionally due to local conditions something more elaborate is required such as a spinning
    one , or one where the whole shebang rotates to point away from the wind
    with the windward side shielded .
    H cowls are good for keeping rain out if that is a problem but they don’t seem as popular as they once were, though there is some crossover some
    cowls are better at creating an up draught while other designs are better
    at stopping downdraught caused by wind conditions.
    The cover over the hole design with side vents for the smoke has been
    around for centuries
    in the form of a slate laid flat on corner supports

    GH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 18:52:24 2025
    On 16/03/2025 11:10, N_Cook wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:45, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with >>>>>>>> enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending >>>>>>>> somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to
    deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched-
    roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising
    sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you
    burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the
    room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.

    Good idea, but there is plenty more up there to replace what's in the
    chimney - and haven't you thus established a steady downdraught within
    the chimney?


    I thought the traditional trick, starting from a cold chimney, was to
    light a series of single sheets of newspaper before setting the nested newspaper and kindling alight.

    Newspaper??
    I think I can remember that stuff.
    (Didn't it have writing on it?)

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marland@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Mar 17 20:03:01 2025
    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 11:10, N_Cook wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:45, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:47, Tim+ wrote:
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    On 15/03/2025 21:20, Tim+ wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <vr4j3d$462a$1@dont-email.me>,
    N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
    Why the near horizontal cap a few inches above the chimney pot top >>>>>>>>> level, or over the replacement metal tube liner?
    Previously any smoke would rise ,unobstructed, vertically with >>>>>>>>> enough
    momentum to clear the wind flow over the roof and down the
    lee-side of
    the house. Before itwould be staying elevated before descending >>>>>>>>> somewhat
    diluted , some distance away.
    Now the stink flows undiluted down to street level to
    deliberately annoy
    innocent neighbours.

    It stops rain getting into the liner.


    And stop Jackdaws filling your chimney with twigs.

    Tim


    That just requires just a coarse mesh, not necessarily of thatched- >>>>>> roof
    fire prevention/ steam-train anti-smuts summer field-fire-raising
    sorts
    of holes dimension


    Then change it. Why does your chimney stink though? What are you
    burning?
    I’ve never found wood smoke stinky.

    Sometimes, before the fire can establish a proper updraught up the
    chimney, thick smoke can puther out of the vents of our stove into the >>>> room.  That stinks and isn't any fun at all.


    Leave the door open for a few minutes before lighting the fire. This
    will allow the column of cold air to flow down.

    Good idea, but there is plenty more up there to replace what's in the
    chimney - and haven't you thus established a steady downdraught within
    the chimney?


    I thought the traditional trick, starting from a cold chimney, was to
    light a series of single sheets of newspaper before setting the nested
    newspaper and kindling alight.

    Newspaper??
    I think I can remember that stuff.
    (Didn't it have writing on it?)


    Since Newspapers started to print in colour from the mid 1980’s they haven’t burnt as well, I think they have china clay or similar impregnated
    in the paper so the inks print neatly.
    Burn a lot of newspaper you get an amount of unburnt material left behind.

    GH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Mar 17 19:42:17 2025
    On 17/03/2025 18:52, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    (Didn't it have writing on it?)


    Yep, and for some more difficult to find to light a wood burner :)



    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 18 09:44:06 2025
    On 17/03/2025 14:20, N_Cook wrote:

    snip <

    The primary purpose of spinning cowls is to increase draught rather than
    stop rain entry though that is another benefit.

    GH

    Which begs the question why replace the spinning cowl with a shallow
    cone dome cap?
    As the spinner must spin due to setting up a pressure difference at each "blade" like multiple wing aerofoils, perhaps it creats too much
    updraught in high wind. Surely then with a mainly enclosed "approved"
    log burner you just restrict air intake at the input air regulator.
    Even if the rain was vertical , with no gutter to these stupid caps and
    no prevailing wind leeside "gargoyle", rain would fall into the
    chimneypot as the liner is smaller than the pot. For the usual angled
    rain it would just enter the 4 inch or so gap between cap and pot rim.


    I cobbled together my own cowl but I either didn't make the top plate
    wide enough or I made the gap between the flue & the top plate too large
    as sometimes I find the ashes are damp when I go to empty them.
    A lot depends on the wind direction & its strength.
    As the wood burner is only used occasionally to allow me to work in my
    shed when it's really cold, it doesn't matter too much.

    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to wasbit on Tue Mar 18 09:51:31 2025
    On 18/03/2025 09:44, wasbit wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 14:20, N_Cook wrote:

    snip <

    The primary purpose of spinning cowls is to increase draught rather than >>> stop rain entry though that is another benefit.

    GH

    Which begs the question why replace the spinning cowl with a shallow
    cone dome cap?
    As the spinner must spin due to setting up a pressure difference at
    each "blade" like multiple wing aerofoils, perhaps it creats too much
    updraught in high wind. Surely then with a mainly enclosed "approved"
    log burner you just restrict air intake at the input air regulator.
    Even if the rain was vertical , with no gutter to these stupid caps
    and no prevailing wind leeside "gargoyle", rain would fall into the
    chimneypot as the liner is smaller than the pot. For the usual angled
    rain it would just enter the 4 inch or so gap between cap and pot rim.


    I cobbled together my own cowl but I either didn't make the top plate
    wide enough or I made the gap between the flue & the top plate too large
    as sometimes I find the ashes are damp when I go to empty them.
    A lot depends on the wind direction & its strength.
    As the wood burner is only used occasionally to allow me to work in my
    shed when it's really cold, it doesn't matter too much.


    The victorians were excellent at inventing this sort of stuff, but the
    majority of the country's chimney pots had no gizmos on top. Perhaps
    they had more respect for the neighbours and let the hot smoke rise
    vertically and contribute to general anonymous smog rather than local smog.


    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 18 11:04:51 2025
    On 18/03/2025 09:51, N_Cook wrote:


    The victorians were excellent at inventing this sort of stuff, but the majority of the country's chimney pots had no gizmos on top. Perhaps
    they had more respect for the neighbours and let the hot smoke rise vertically and contribute to general anonymous smog rather than local smog.



    All those tall chimneys in the black country towns did little for local pollution.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)