• =?UTF-8?Q?Octopus=20=E2=80=98Free=20gas=20safety=20check=E2=80=99?=

    From Spike@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 29 18:34:42 2025
    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is serviced - not by Octopus.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham.@21:1/5 to Spike on Tue Apr 29 21:04:19 2025
    On 29 Apr 2025 18:34:42 GMT, Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:


    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An >unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I wont be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is >serviced - not by Octopus.

    I haven't had that one from Octopus but I did have the one that said
    my meter is too old and possibly out of calibration but failed to say
    which meter, gas or electric. (1984 & 1978 respectively, so probably
    some justification!)

    Anyway I ignored them.

    My current supplier (Pun!) OVO sent me this
    https://ibb.co/cKMdcPbT

    The thing is the tariff was their basic fixed tariff when I took it
    last July, absolutely nothing "Smart" about it. If there was any
    mention of requiring Smartmeters it must have been deep in the small
    print.

    I'll probably be switching again in July, so they better hurry up if
    the' re sending the heavies round.

    PS the subject line in this post may look like the one in your OP but
    the quotation marks are different, the ones you used are illegal in
    Eternal September BTSTGTTS.

    --
    Graham.

    %Profound_observation%

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Graham. on Thu May 1 09:52:50 2025
    On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:04:19 +0100
    Graham. <usenet@yopmail.com> wrote:

    On 29 Apr 2025 18:34:42 GMT, Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:


    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these
    checks? An unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my
    boiler is serviced - not by Octopus.

    I haven't had that one from Octopus but I did have the one that said
    my meter is too old and possibly out of calibration but failed to say
    which meter, gas or electric. (1984 & 1978 respectively, so probably
    some justification!)

    Anyway I ignored them.

    My current supplier (Pun!) OVO sent me this
    https://ibb.co/cKMdcPbT

    The thing is the tariff was their basic fixed tariff when I took it
    last July, absolutely nothing "Smart" about it. If there was any
    mention of requiring Smartmeters it must have been deep in the small
    print.

    It's usually there, but not prominent at all.

    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Vir Campestris@21:1/5 to Spike on Sat May 3 21:09:37 2025
    On 29/04/2025 19:34, Spike wrote:
    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    A few years ago my (different) electricity company called me to say my
    meter was out of calibration, and they wanted to replace it.

    "Fine", I said, "but I don't want a smart meter. Anyway it probably
    won't work here as the mobile signal is rubbish."

    Tap, tap, tap "Oh yes, we have has some failed installs in your area.
    Goodbye"

    "Hang on", I said, "what about the calibration"

    "Oh, that doesn't matter".

    It was a lie to make me take a smart meter.

    Andy

    --
    Do not listen to rumour, but, if you do, do not believe it.
    Ghandi.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to Spike on Sat May 3 20:59:11 2025
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for trying.

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is
    serviced - not by Octopus.

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money.

    Tim

    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 3 22:34:03 2025
    On 03/05/2025 21:59, Tim+ wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An
    unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for trying.


    They are fined when they don't achieve them...

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is >> serviced - not by Octopus.

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded
    from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money.


    Those seem to be a bit thin on the ground at present

    Tim


    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay on Sat May 3 21:35:38 2025
    Tim+ <timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay> wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An
    unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for trying.

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is >> serviced - not by Octopus.

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded
    from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money.

    Tim

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing
    machine at two in the morning, or have malevolent actors turn off the electricity remotely.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Vir Campestris on Sat May 3 21:35:38 2025
    Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 19:34, Spike wrote:
    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An
    unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    A few years ago my (different) electricity company called me to say my
    meter was out of calibration, and they wanted to replace it.

    "Fine", I said, "but I don't want a smart meter. Anyway it probably
    won't work here as the mobile signal is rubbish."

    Tap, tap, tap "Oh yes, we have has some failed installs in your area. Goodbye"

    "Hang on", I said, "what about the calibration"

    "Oh, that doesn't matter".

    It was a lie to make me take a smart meter.

    Andy

    There’s a lot of it about, unfortunately.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 3 23:52:21 2025
    On 03/05/2025 21:59, Tim+ wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An
    unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for trying.

    I agree with that.

    "The Government" (whoever it was at the time) mandated that power
    companies had to meet targets for smart meter installs - but there is no compulsion on householders to have one.

    Enough meters have now been fitted so that the majority of untouched
    households fall into the
    "Sod off! I don't want one!"
    category.

    It was always destined to end in tears before bedtime.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to David Wade on Sun May 4 06:15:31 2025
    David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> wrote:
    On 03/05/2025 21:59, Tim+ wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An >>> unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for
    upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for >> trying.


    They are fined when they don't achieve them...

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is >>> serviced - not by Octopus.

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart
    meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded
    from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money.


    Those seem to be a bit thin on the ground at present

    Eh? There are lots of smart tariffs for folk who have invested in the appropriate tech, EVs, solar, home battery etc.

    I virtually never pay more than 7.5p per kWhr for my power consumed and my exports to the grid more than cover the cost of my import for 6 months of
    the year.

    Tim


    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to Spike on Sun May 4 06:15:31 2025
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
    Tim+ <timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay> wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An >>> unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for
    upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for >> trying.

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is >>> serviced - not by Octopus.

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart
    meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded
    from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money.

    Tim

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing machine at two in the morning,

    If you have a home battery +/- solar, you don’t need to.

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.


    Of all the things I worry about these days, that’s *way* down the list.

    Tim

    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay on Sun May 4 08:40:28 2025
    Tim+ <timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay> wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
    Tim+ <timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay> wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An >>>> unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for
    upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for >>> trying.

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is
    serviced - not by Octopus.

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart
    meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded
    from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money. >>>
    Tim

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing
    machine at two in the morning,

    If you have a home battery +/- solar, you don’t need to.

    Let’s crunch some numbers…

    We use about 8kWh per day at 22p/kWh, or £642 per year, but have lost the interest payable on a piddly 4kW system at £12000, which itself comes to £500.

    So, if the installation could supply all my electricity, which at 4kW it won’t, there’s a gain of £142, and payback time will be 12000/142, or not far short of 90 years.

    Of course, there is the gain from selling surplus electricity back to the
    grid, perhaps that might halve the payback time to a mere 45 years.

    Oh! But in that time I’ll need two battery replacements, at 10 grand,
    perhaps a failed inverter or two, and the panels will be shagged out
    anyway.

    I hope you did your costings before signing up…

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Of all the things I worry about these days, that’s *way* down the list.

    That’s an OK philosophy, until the power goes off. Just look at how long
    M&S are taking to get their systems back on track. Two weeks of no
    electricity and the streets would be a bloodbath.

    The figures above for system costs are from a brief internet search. If
    anyone had more appropriate numbers, that would be interesting to look at.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 4 09:39:11 2025
    On 4 May 2025 at 07:15:31 BST, Tim+ wrote:

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart
    meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded
    from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money. >>>

    Those seem to be a bit thin on the ground at present

    Eh? There are lots of smart tariffs for folk who have invested in the appropriate tech, EVs, solar, home battery etc.

    I virtually never pay more than 7.5p per kWhr for my power consumed and my exports to the grid more than cover the cost of my import for 6 months of
    the year.

    Is there a 'smart tarrif' comparison site or a good place to look at the options?

    I've chosen quite a conservative option with Eon, but I'd like to look at
    other options like overnight battery top-up and variable pricing.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Spike on Sun May 4 10:02:09 2025
    On 4 May 2025 at 09:40:28 BST, Spike wrote:

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing
    machine at two in the morning,

    If you have a home battery +/- solar, you don’t need to.

    Let’s crunch some numbers…

    Let's :-)

    We use about 8kWh per day at 22p/kWh, or £642 per year, but have lost the interest payable on a piddly 4kW system at £12000, which itself comes to £500.


    That's about double what I'd expect a good quality installation to cost - mine was £7000.

    So, if the installation could supply all my electricity, which at 4kW it won’t,

    My 8 panel system, which is far from south facing, generated 2400kw/h over the past year. So 6.5kW/h/day

    there’s a gain of £142, and payback time will be 12000/142, or not
    far short of 90 years.


    My total for the year is £470 (£130 direct solar to home, £170 solar to battery, £170 solar to grid). So, crudely, £7000/£470 - 15 years.

    Of course, there is the gain from selling surplus electricity back to the grid, perhaps that might halve the payback time to a mere 45 years.

    Oh! But in that time I’ll need two battery replacements, at 10 grand, perhaps a failed inverter or two, and the panels will be shagged out
    anyway.

    Battery and inverter guaranteed for 10 years. Replacement costs about £1200/£1500 after that at today's prices.


    I hope you did your costings before signing up…

    Yes, but as explained here and elsewhere, there's usually more to it than cost and finacial return. If that's your sole reason for adopting solar. you're
    less likely to do it. Unless you can lash up an extensive array, and/or you
    can DIY.

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Of all the things I worry about these days, that’s *way* down the list.

    That’s an OK philosophy, until the power goes off. Just look at how long M&S are taking to get their systems back on track. Two weeks of no electricity and the streets would be a bloodbath.


    If you have solar/battery, it's possible to run off-grid for about 7 months (I don't have that option). Domestic solar is highly unlikely to ever be a year round proposal in the UK until some form of storage better than the current system (of batteries) comes about.

    The figures above for system costs are from a brief internet search.

    Evidently.

    If
    anyone had more appropriate numbers, that would be interesting to look at.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Spike on Sun May 4 11:41:39 2025
    On 03/05/2025 22:35, Spike wrote:
    Tim+ <timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay> wrote:
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An >>> unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    I believe power companies have government mandated targets to meet for
    upgrading householders to smart meters so you can’t really blame them for >> trying.

    I won’t be taking up the offer as I get a safety check when my boiler is >>> serviced - not by Octopus.

    As long as you don’t want any of the advantages conferred by having a smart
    meter, fine. The day will come though when you’ll find that you’re excluded
    from “smart tariffs” that could potentially save you a lot of money.

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing machine at two in the morning,

    Or going hungry waiting for the cheaper rate to apply so I can cook
    dinner. (What if the *standard* rate is ten times the cheap rate, and
    the latter is what I pay now?)

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Or someone at the suppliers tapping the wrong thing and cutting you off
    by accident, as happened for the common area supply for my flats - took
    three days for it to be reconnected.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun May 4 14:03:20 2025
    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 4 May 2025 at 09:40:28 BST, Spike wrote:

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing >>>> machine at two in the morning,

    If you have a home battery +/- solar, you don’t need to.

    Let’s crunch some numbers…

    Let's :-)

    We use about 8kWh per day at 22p/kWh, or £642 per year, but have lost the >> interest payable on a piddly 4kW system at £12000, which itself comes to
    £500.


    That's about double what I'd expect a good quality installation to cost - mine
    was £7000.

    So, if the installation could supply all my electricity, which at 4kW it
    won’t,

    My 8 panel system, which is far from south facing, generated 2400kw/h over the
    past year. So 6.5kW/h/day

    there’s a gain of £142, and payback time will be 12000/142, or not
    far short of 90 years.


    My total for the year is £470 (£130 direct solar to home, £170 solar to battery, £170 solar to grid). So, crudely, £7000/£470 - 15 years.

    Of course, there is the gain from selling surplus electricity back to the
    grid, perhaps that might halve the payback time to a mere 45 years.

    Oh! But in that time I’ll need two battery replacements, at 10 grand,
    perhaps a failed inverter or two, and the panels will be shagged out
    anyway.

    Battery and inverter guaranteed for 10 years. Replacement costs about £1200/£1500 after that at today's prices.


    I hope you did your costings before signing up…

    Yes, but as explained here and elsewhere, there's usually more to it than cost
    and finacial return. If that's your sole reason for adopting solar. you're less likely to do it. Unless you can lash up an extensive array, and/or you can DIY.

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Of all the things I worry about these days, that’s *way* down the list.

    That’s an OK philosophy, until the power goes off. Just look at how long >> M&S are taking to get their systems back on track. Two weeks of no
    electricity and the streets would be a bloodbath.

    If you have solar/battery, it's possible to run off-grid for about 7 months (I
    don't have that option).

    Don’t the inverters shut down if there’s no mains?

    But the food and water supply industries can’t service the population for seven months, if the electricity goes off. Much the same goes for public services.

    If your house is showing lights at night, or there’s cooking odours wafting about, you’re likely to have some very unwelcome visitors.

    Phone the police? No electricity…

    Domestic solar is highly unlikely to ever be a year
    round proposal in the UK until some form of storage better than the current system (of batteries) comes about.

    The figures above for system costs are from a brief internet search.

    Evidently.

    One had to start somewhere…

    If
    anyone had more appropriate numbers, that would be interesting to look at.

    Thanks for posting those numbers.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nib@21:1/5 to Spike on Sun May 4 15:09:25 2025
    On 2025-05-04 15:03, Spike wrote:

    If your house is showing lights at night, or there’s cooking odours wafting about, you’re likely to have some very unwelcome visitors.

    Phone the police? No electricity…

    Presumably that's why the Leftpondians stock up on firearms as well as
    food and fuel!

    nib

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Sun May 4 15:38:41 2025
    Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
    On 03/05/2025 22:35, Spike wrote:

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing
    machine at two in the morning,

    Or going hungry waiting for the cheaper rate to apply so I can cook
    dinner. (What if the *standard* rate is ten times the cheap rate, and
    the latter is what I pay now?)

    Such a scenario would result in street riots, with people demanding to know where the cheap renewable energy, promised for at least the last twenty
    years and that’s cost us trillions, has actually got to.

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Or someone at the suppliers tapping the wrong thing and cutting you off
    by accident, as happened for the common area supply for my flats - took
    three days for it to be reconnected.

    Ouch.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Spike on Sun May 4 19:18:10 2025
    On 04/05/2025 16:38, Spike wrote:
    Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
    On 03/05/2025 22:35, Spike wrote:

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing
    machine at two in the morning,

    Or going hungry waiting for the cheaper rate to apply so I can cook
    dinner. (What if the *standard* rate is ten times the cheap rate, and
    the latter is what I pay now?)

    Such a scenario would result in street riots, with people demanding to know where the cheap renewable energy, promised for at least the last twenty
    years and that’s cost us trillions, has actually got to.

    They would blame in on the Tories Brexit climate change anf *not enough renewable energy*.

    You know that.

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Or someone at the suppliers tapping the wrong thing and cutting you off
    by accident, as happened for the common area supply for my flats - took
    three days for it to be reconnected.

    Ouch.



    --
    "And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch".

    Gospel of St. Mathew 15:14

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun May 4 19:33:18 2025
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 04/05/2025 16:38, Spike wrote:
    Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
    On 03/05/2025 22:35, Spike wrote:

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing >>>> machine at two in the morning,

    Or going hungry waiting for the cheaper rate to apply so I can cook
    dinner. (What if the *standard* rate is ten times the cheap rate, and
    the latter is what I pay now?)

    Such a scenario would result in street riots, with people demanding to know >> where the cheap renewable energy, promised for at least the last twenty
    years and that’s cost us trillions, has actually got to.

    They would blame in on the Tories Brexit climate change anf *not enough renewable energy*.

    You know that.

    Of course! It’s practically the only the only answer they have.

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Or someone at the suppliers tapping the wrong thing and cutting you off
    by accident, as happened for the common area supply for my flats - took
    three days for it to be reconnected.

    Ouch.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Spike on Mon May 5 20:51:18 2025
    On 04/05/2025 16:38, Spike wrote:
    Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
    On 03/05/2025 22:35, Spike wrote:

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing
    machine at two in the morning,

    Or going hungry waiting for the cheaper rate to apply so I can cook
    dinner. (What if the *standard* rate is ten times the cheap rate, and
    the latter is what I pay now?)

    Such a scenario would result in street riots, with people demanding to know where the cheap renewable energy, promised for at least the last twenty
    years and that’s cost us trillions, has actually got to.


    Happy to hear we can rely on good old street riots to help keep the
    lights on.

    P.S. Massive increase in electricity costs. Isn't that _exactly_ what happened in Texas, not too long ago?


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Spike on Mon May 5 20:47:16 2025
    On 04/05/2025 15:03, Spike wrote:
    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 4 May 2025 at 09:40:28 BST, Spike wrote:

    I’m quite willing to spend good money not having to load the washing >>>>> machine at two in the morning,

    If you have a home battery +/- solar, you don’t need to.

    Let’s crunch some numbers…

    Let's :-)

    We use about 8kWh per day at 22p/kWh, or £642 per year, but have lost the >>> interest payable on a piddly 4kW system at £12000, which itself comes to >>> £500.


    That's about double what I'd expect a good quality installation to cost - mine
    was £7000.

    So, if the installation could supply all my electricity, which at 4kW it >>> won’t,

    My 8 panel system, which is far from south facing, generated 2400kw/h over the
    past year. So 6.5kW/h/day

    there’s a gain of £142, and payback time will be 12000/142, or not
    far short of 90 years.


    My total for the year is £470 (£130 direct solar to home, £170 solar to >> battery, £170 solar to grid). So, crudely, £7000/£470 - 15 years.

    Of course, there is the gain from selling surplus electricity back to the >>> grid, perhaps that might halve the payback time to a mere 45 years.

    Oh! But in that time I’ll need two battery replacements, at 10 grand,
    perhaps a failed inverter or two, and the panels will be shagged out
    anyway.

    Battery and inverter guaranteed for 10 years. Replacement costs about
    £1200/£1500 after that at today's prices.


    I hope you did your costings before signing up…

    Yes, but as explained here and elsewhere, there's usually more to it than cost
    and finacial return. If that's your sole reason for adopting solar. you're >> less likely to do it. Unless you can lash up an extensive array, and/or you >> can DIY.

    or have malevolent actors turn off the
    electricity remotely.

    Of all the things I worry about these days, that’s *way* down the list.

    That’s an OK philosophy, until the power goes off. Just look at how long >>> M&S are taking to get their systems back on track. Two weeks of no
    electricity and the streets would be a bloodbath.

    If you have solar/battery, it's possible to run off-grid for about 7 months (I
    don't have that option).

    Don’t the inverters shut down if there’s no mains?

    But the food and water supply industries can’t service the population for seven months, if the electricity goes off. Much the same goes for public services.

    If your house is showing lights at night, or there’s cooking odours wafting about, you’re likely to have some very unwelcome visitors.

    Phone the police? No electricity…

    Back in the late 60s early 70s when lengthy powercuts were common, a
    co-worker was proactive enought to buy and install a generator at home.

    Cuts occurred.
    Their house had lights. The other houses were in darkness.

    Several visits from... concerned neighbours... who were all aware that co-worker's wife worked for the CEGB (Central Electricity Generating Board).

    They all seemed convinced that she was somehow getting special treatment
    and whilst all their supplies were 'switched off', her house was somehow exempted.
    The neighbours had to be shown the generator - and the receipt for the generator to prove that they had paid for it.
    I bet some of them were still not convinced.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 5 21:13:01 2025
    Tim+ wrote:

    I virtually never pay more than 7.5p per kWhr for my power consumed and my exports to the grid more than cover the cost of my import for 6 months of
    the year.

    So, for one half of the year you effectively pay nothing to your energy supplier, ad the other half of the year you pay a third of what most
    people pay?

    Presumably you need to be grid connected, to even it out when it's dark
    cold and still? If everyone did that, I suspect the standing charges
    would be £2/day or more.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon May 5 20:56:44 2025
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Tim+ wrote:

    I virtually never pay more than 7.5p per kWhr for my power consumed and my >> exports to the grid more than cover the cost of my import for 6 months of
    the year.

    So, for one half of the year you effectively pay nothing to your energy supplier, ad the other half of the year you pay a third of what most
    people pay?

    More or less.


    Presumably you need to be grid connected, to even it out when it's dark
    cold and still?

    Indeed, I use my grid connection to charge my home battery at cheap rate
    every night. As we now have a heat pump we’ll almost certainly be drawing power during peak times in the colder/darker months as our battery capacity isn’t enough to run the heating all day on an overnight charge. We might upgrade the battery but I think I need to see how much we’re “banking” in our account over the summer months when our power company effectively pays
    us.

    If everyone did that, I suspect the standing charges
    would be £2/day or more.

    I leave those sums to my power company. Octopus is one of the companies that’s most pro-active in encouraging the utilisation of smart tariffs and
    I assume they know what they’re doing.

    Tim

    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 6 07:46:17 2025
    On 5 May 2025 at 21:56:44 BST, Tim+ wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Tim+ wrote:

    I virtually never pay more than 7.5p per kWhr for my power consumed and my >>> exports to the grid more than cover the cost of my import for 6 months of >>> the year.

    So, for one half of the year you effectively pay nothing to your energy
    supplier, ad the other half of the year you pay a third of what most
    people pay?

    More or less.


    Presumably you need to be grid connected, to even it out when it's dark
    cold and still?

    Indeed, I use my grid connection to charge my home battery at cheap rate every night. As we now have a heat pump we’ll almost certainly be drawing power during peak times in the colder/darker months as our battery capacity isn’t enough to run the heating all day on an overnight charge. We might upgrade the battery but I think I need to see how much we’re “banking” in
    our account over the summer months when our power company effectively pays us.

    If everyone did that, I suspect the standing charges
    would be £2/day or more.

    I leave those sums to my power company. Octopus is one of the companies that’s most pro-active in encouraging the utilisation of smart tariffs and I assume they know what they’re doing.


    You're with Octopus I assume?

    It's a pain transferring to them - you have to sign up to their standard 'flexible' tariff and then 'wait for emails' relating to more adventurous tariffs such as solar export and battery import. No information about what you may/may not be able to apply for. IIUC.

    And as it stands their flexible tariff is about 15% more than my present Eon deal.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Spike on Tue May 6 09:40:06 2025
    On 29/04/2025 19:34, Spike wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    As it's taken me 15 months of hectoring and prodding Octopus to come and replace my dumb Gas Meter with a Smart one (finally happening next
    week), I doubt they're trying to find an excuse to turn up !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Tue May 6 09:32:06 2025
    Mark Carver <mark@invalid.com> wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 19:34, Spike wrote:

    Why has Octopus emailed me to say that I can have one of these checks? An
    unsubtle way of lumbering me with a smart meter?

    As it's taken me 15 months of hectoring and prodding Octopus to come and replace my dumb Gas Meter with a Smart one (finally happening next
    week), I doubt they're trying to find an excuse to turn up !

    But…but…they tell me they are installing smart meters in my area…LOL

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 6 13:06:16 2025
    On 6 May 2025 at 13:50:46 BST, Tim+ wrote:

    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 5 May 2025 at 21:56:44 BST, Tim+ wrote:



    I leave those sums to my power company. Octopus is one of the companies >>> that’s most pro-active in encouraging the utilisation of smart tariffs and
    I assume they know what they’re doing.


    You're with Octopus I assume?

    It's a pain transferring to them - you have to sign up to their standard
    'flexible' tariff and then 'wait for emails' relating to more adventurous
    tariffs such as solar export and battery import. No information about what you
    may/may not be able to apply for. IIUC.

    They only depend on them being able to access half hourly data from your meter. Once that’s established you’re free to choose from the various options. Usually takes a couple of weeks. They can’t promise you access to a smart tariffs and I if they can’t access your smart data.


    Which they can. Or at least I can, currently. Wonder why they don't ask at the outset? I'd still have to start with their unfavourable tariff. Just feels
    like 'fingers crossed'.

    Anyway, I've written to them to see if they can give me a litle more information.

    Rob

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to RJH on Tue May 6 12:50:46 2025
    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 5 May 2025 at 21:56:44 BST, Tim+ wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Tim+ wrote:

    I virtually never pay more than 7.5p per kWhr for my power consumed and my >>>> exports to the grid more than cover the cost of my import for 6 months of >>>> the year.

    So, for one half of the year you effectively pay nothing to your energy
    supplier, ad the other half of the year you pay a third of what most
    people pay?

    More or less.


    Presumably you need to be grid connected, to even it out when it's dark
    cold and still?

    Indeed, I use my grid connection to charge my home battery at cheap rate
    every night. As we now have a heat pump we’ll almost certainly be drawing >> power during peak times in the colder/darker months as our battery capacity >> isn’t enough to run the heating all day on an overnight charge. We might >> upgrade the battery but I think I need to see how much we’re “banking” in
    our account over the summer months when our power company effectively pays >> us.

    If everyone did that, I suspect the standing charges
    would be £2/day or more.

    I leave those sums to my power company. Octopus is one of the companies
    that’s most pro-active in encouraging the utilisation of smart tariffs and >> I assume they know what they’re doing.


    You're with Octopus I assume?

    It's a pain transferring to them - you have to sign up to their standard 'flexible' tariff and then 'wait for emails' relating to more adventurous tariffs such as solar export and battery import. No information about what you
    may/may not be able to apply for. IIUC.

    They only depend on them being able to access half hourly data from your
    meter. Once that’s established you’re free to choose from the various options. Usually takes a couple of weeks. They can’t promise you access
    to a smart tariffs and I if they can’t access your smart data.


    And as it stands their flexible tariff is about 15% more than my present Eon deal.

    Not surprising. Swings and roundabouts etc.

    Tim


    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim+@21:1/5 to RJH on Tue May 6 16:22:08 2025
    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 6 May 2025 at 13:50:46 BST, Tim+ wrote:

    RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 5 May 2025 at 21:56:44 BST, Tim+ wrote:



    I leave those sums to my power company. Octopus is one of the companies >>>> that’s most pro-active in encouraging the utilisation of smart tariffs and
    I assume they know what they’re doing.


    You're with Octopus I assume?

    It's a pain transferring to them - you have to sign up to their standard >>> 'flexible' tariff and then 'wait for emails' relating to more adventurous >>> tariffs such as solar export and battery import. No information about what you
    may/may not be able to apply for. IIUC.

    They only depend on them being able to access half hourly data from your
    meter. Once that’s established you’re free to choose from the various
    options. Usually takes a couple of weeks. They can’t promise you access >> to a smart tariffs and I if they can’t access your smart data.


    Which they can. Or at least I can, currently. Wonder why they don't ask at the
    outset?

    Because they don’t do things on “trust”. Also, I then when migrating between suppliers there’s jiggery pokery that goes on with the DCC that
    means that there can be a delay in a new provider getting access to the
    data.

    I'd still have to start with their unfavourable tariff. Just feels
    like 'fingers crossed'.

    Anyway, I've written to them to see if they can give me a litle more information.

    Rob


    As I say, it’s generally only a couple of weeks.

    Tim



    --
    Please don't feed the trolls

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)