• Re: OT: Water bills

    From nib@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed May 28 11:02:56 2025
    On 2025-05-28 10:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46%
    over the next six years.  My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556 and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?


    Unfortunately not me! I've had one installed for well over a year and it
    still has not transmitted a reading. Neither has any other in the road.
    They've been round twice with their diagnostic tablets to no avail. They manually read the meter via the LCD display twice a year.

    nib

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 10:54:50 2025
    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46%
    over the next six years. My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556
    and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed May 28 11:21:26 2025
    On Wed, 28 May 2025 10:54:50 +0100
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:

    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say
    46% over the next six years. My last few bills have been £438, £484,
    £556 and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?


    Mine is read once every 6 months (at least, that's what the bills say).
    Essex and Suffolk Water. I log it about once per month.
    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nib@21:1/5 to charles on Wed May 28 11:52:06 2025
    On 2025-05-28 11:45, charles wrote:
    In article <m9o5ahFlpr5U1@mid.individual.net>,
    nib <news@ingram-bromley.co.uk> wrote:
    On 2025-05-28 10:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46% >>> over the next six years. My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556 >>> and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?


    Unfortunately not me! I've had one installed for well over a year and it
    still has not transmitted a reading. Neither has any other in the road.
    They've been round twice with their diagnostic tablets to no avail. They
    manually read the meter via the LCD display twice a year.

    nib

    I wouldn't have thought that a water meter about 2' below ground was in a good position to transmit any data


    The meter sits at the bottom of the hole, with a small battery in it. It
    talks wirelessly to a plastic lump fixed to the underside of the lid
    over the hole with a bigger battery in it. That lump talks to the
    network. I think it uses an ultra low power occasional data service via
    normal phone masts but I could be wrong.

    nib

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to nib on Wed May 28 10:45:02 2025
    In article <m9o5ahFlpr5U1@mid.individual.net>,
    nib <news@ingram-bromley.co.uk> wrote:
    On 2025-05-28 10:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46% over the next six years. My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556
    and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?


    Unfortunately not me! I've had one installed for well over a year and it still has not transmitted a reading. Neither has any other in the road. They've been round twice with their diagnostic tablets to no avail. They manually read the meter via the LCD display twice a year.

    nib

    I wouldn't have thought that a water meter about 2' below ground was in a
    good position to transmit any data

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 11:24:00 2025
    On 28/05/2025 in message <m9o4rgFlgafU1@mid.individual.net> Andy Burns
    wrote:

    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46%
    over the next six years. My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556
    and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their website,
    and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're still >left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online account yet, >anyone know how frequently they get read?

    Slightly tangential but Thames Water has been fined around £120 million
    which means there is that much less for repairs and they will recover it
    from customers over time anyway.

    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water companies
    can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for maintenance/upgrades.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.
    (Ken Olson, president Digital Equipment, 1977)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to nib on Wed May 28 12:37:11 2025
    On 28/05/2025 11:02, nib wrote:
    On 2025-05-28 10:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say
    46% over the next six years.  My last few bills have been £438, £484,
    £556 and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?


    Unfortunately not me! I've had one installed for well over a year and it still has not transmitted a reading. Neither has any other in the road. They've been round twice with their diagnostic tablets to no avail. They manually read the meter via the LCD display twice a year.

    nib



    My non-smart water meter is read at least twice a year.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Wed May 28 12:46:44 2025
    On 28/05/2025 12:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water companies
    can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for maintenance/upgrades.
    Such a good plan it will never catch on...

    --
    The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly
    diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
    into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
    what it actually is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 12:48:02 2025
    On 28/05/2025 12:37, alan_m wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 11:02, nib wrote:
    On 2025-05-28 10:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say
    46% over the next six years.  My last few bills have been £438, £484, >>> £556 and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?


    Unfortunately not me! I've had one installed for well over a year and
    it still has not transmitted a reading. Neither has any other in the
    road. They've been round twice with their diagnostic tablets to no
    avail. They manually read the meter via the LCD display twice a year.

    nib



    My non-smart water meter is read at least twice a year.

    I've got an acre and a half and a pond that needs topping up. And a
    private sewage treatment plant.

    I dont have a water meter :-)

    --
    The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly
    diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
    into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
    what it actually is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed May 28 13:09:53 2025
    On 28 May 2025 at 12:46:44 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 12:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water companies
    can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for
    maintenance/upgrades.
    Such a good plan it will never catch on...

    or nationalise. Just sent one of the perpetrators a letter:

    --
    Dear Steve Reed MP,

    Firstly, I’m amazed that you accepted free football tickets from the water industry. You clearly cannot see how accepting ‘gifts’ of this kind can be linked to the suggestion that you are open to influence.

    Secondly, I feel this is particularly worrying as you continue to block your Independent Commission from evaluating public ownership of the water industry. Why might you be doing this, in the face of substantial evidence in support of nationalisation? At the very least, I’m left wondering why we are all paying around a third of our water bill simply to service the debt the industry has taken on since privatisation.

    Please don’t take money or other gifts from the industries you are supposed to
    oversee. In fact, please don’t take gifts linked to your job in any event. You
    get a decent salary. And please give nationalisation a decent airing. I
    believe it’s in the best interests of the country.

    Yours sincerely,
    --

    --
    Cheers, Rob

    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny . . .'" Isaac Asimov

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham.@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 13:21:58 2025
    Here in United Utilities land, the meters are polled at random
    intervals by passing UU vans (or in principle any other suitably
    equipped vehicle, or even hand-held devices).
    --

    Graham.
    %Profound_observation%

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Johnson@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 15:15:18 2025
    On Wed, 28 May 2025 11:02:56 +0100, nib <news@ingram-bromley.co.uk>
    wrote:

    On 2025-05-28 10:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Obviously water bills are going up.

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46%
    over the next six years.  My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556
    and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    OFWAT don't seem to publish much about agreed increases on their
    website, and suggest visiting

    <https://www.discoverwater.co.uk/annual-bill>

    Last week (unprompted) they fitted smartmeters down our road, we're
    still left on unmetered bills, the readings don't show on my online
    account yet, anyone know how frequently they get read?


    Unfortunately not me! I've had one installed for well over a year and it >still has not transmitted a reading. Neither has any other in the road. >They've been round twice with their diagnostic tablets to no avail. They >manually read the meter via the LCD display twice a year.


    My ST smart meter was installed early in 2024. The next bill which
    they haven't told me about which is on the ST website used a reading
    taken from it.

    There is supposed to be a useage tracker online but I can't find it.
    ST are also considering changing their charging for smart meter users,
    so that the first 10 cu metres pm is charged at a lower rate, the next
    10 cu metres charged at a rate similar to now and the next 10 cu
    metres is charged at a higher rate, to encourage economy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 13:35:02 2025
    They should privatise them so we can choose our supplier.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to Peter Johnson on Wed May 28 14:10:39 2025
    On Wed, 28 May 2025 14:59:21 +0100, Peter Johnson wrote:

    On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:35:02 -0000 (UTC), Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:

    They should privatise them so we can choose our supplier.

    The water industry was supposed to be opened to competition but it never happened.

    Well that's 2 of us that remember.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Johnson@21:1/5 to jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com on Wed May 28 14:59:21 2025
    On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:35:02 -0000 (UTC), Jethro_uk
    <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:

    They should privatise them so we can choose our supplier.

    The water industry was supposed to be opened to competition but it
    never happened.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 28 15:06:29 2025
    On 28 May 2025 at 14:35:02 BST, Jethro_uk wrote:

    They should privatise them so we can choose our supplier.

    The water industry is privatised - a set of regional private companies. OFWAT set out a plan to enable switching in 2016*. The industry wasn't interested - they much prefer regional monopolies. Governments have decided not to adopt
    it.

    * https://www.ofwat.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/pap_tec20160715rrremergingstakeholder.pdf

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "My humble friend, we know not how to live this life which is so short yet seek one that never ends."
    -- Anatole France

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Peter Johnson on Wed May 28 19:10:12 2025
    Peter Johnson wrote:

    The water industry was supposed to be opened to competition but it
    never happened.

    Or rather, it only happened for business/industrial customers, not
    residential ones.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to charles on Wed May 28 19:07:20 2025
    charles wrote:

    I wouldn't have thought that a water meter about 2' below ground was in a good position to transmit any data

    I haven't popped open the new 'toby' they installed yet to have a look,
    but I understand some of them have an aerial poking up from the meter to
    be just under the lid, which is now plastic instead of cast iron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Roger Mills on Wed May 28 23:12:42 2025
    Roger Mills wrote:

    My smart water meter (Severn Trent) is read at least once per hour -
    probably more frequently

    Fitted inside your house, or under the pavement?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Roger Mills on Thu May 29 09:00:25 2025
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people depending on
    the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are only
    2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house).

    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern
    Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then
    subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marland@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Thu May 29 09:06:36 2025
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:


    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern
    Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.

    Useful to know.

    I wonder if that would be as easy to achieve where supplied water is from
    one company but sewage is the responsibility of another? We are on a
    septic tank but where the sewage system starts a couple of miles away
    Wessex water handle that but Bournemouth Water now a subsidiary of
    SouthWest are the suppliers.
    Wessex do offer a £27 per annum discount they call a rainwater allowance if you can satisfy them that a quantity does not reach their system but is
    used on the ground.

    A friend whose flower growing hobby meant he had greenhouses almost the
    size of commercial ones
    would have saved a lot over the years, unfortunately he is no longer in a condition to continue so I won’t suggest it.

    GH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu May 29 09:54:59 2025
    Andy Burns wrote:

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46%
    over the next six years.  My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556 and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    Water bills have always flown under the radar to me, worth not switching
    to a meter in order to have freedom to use water without worrying about
    it, has everyone else's risen as much (on the old RV scheme)?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu May 29 10:58:57 2025
    On 29/05/2025 09:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Andy Burns wrote:

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say
    46% over the next six years.  My last few bills have been £438, £484,
    £556 and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    Water bills have always flown under the radar to me, worth not switching
    to a meter in order to have freedom to use water without worrying about
    it, has everyone else's risen as much (on the old RV scheme)?

    From Wessex water https://www.wessexwater.co.uk/bills-and-accounts/changes-to-our-charges

    a typical metered bill (based on a usage of 100m³ per year) will be 21%
    higher this year, compared to 2024-25


    a typical unmetered bill (based on the average property rateable value)
    will be 24% higher this year, compared to 2024-25.


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Marland on Thu May 29 11:19:46 2025
    On 29/05/2025 10:06, Marland wrote:
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:


    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern
    Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then
    subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.

    Useful to know.

    I wonder if that would be as easy to achieve where supplied water is from
    one company but sewage is the responsibility of another? We are on a
    septic tank but where the sewage system starts a couple of miles away
    Wessex water handle that but Bournemouth Water now a subsidiary of
    SouthWest are the suppliers.
    Wessex do offer a £27 per annum discount they call a rainwater allowance if you can satisfy them that a quantity does not reach their system but is
    used on the ground.

    It would probably be best to ring up Wessex and ask them if they'd take
    a meter reading on a garden tap as proof it had not gone through the
    sewage system.

    FWIW I've used about 8500 litres in the last 3 weeks. That's around £20
    saved on sewerage charges. If the lack of rain continues here I'll be
    using the same amount or even more in the next few weeks.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Roger Mills on Thu May 29 15:40:05 2025
    On 29/05/2025 12:41, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 09:00, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people depending on >>> the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are only >>> 2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house).

    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern
    Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then
    subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.


    I didn't know that you could that. I must check whether STW does the
    same. As it happens, I *have* got a neter on my garden tap. I bought it originally to meter the whole house to see whether it was worth having
    an official fitted - which it was. When my meter became redundant for
    its original purpose, I moved it to the garden tap to keep an eye on how
    much I was using for watering.

    It's best to check by phoning STW. I can't remember how I discovered the sewerage allowance. I just searched the SW website and couldn't find it!
    Same with the STW website...

    It's not surprising they "hide" these things, as a lot of customers are
    paying well over the odds for something they're not using. :-(

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Thu May 29 17:02:49 2025
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people depending on the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are only
    2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house).

    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern
    Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.

    Do you need an 'official' meter (from the supplier, calibrated etc) or will they accept the reading from a third party meter?

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu May 29 17:06:35 2025
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Andy Burns wrote:

    Severn Trent claim average increase of 21% this year, local rags say 46% over the next six years.  My last few bills have been £438, £484, £556 and now £703, so 60% over four years and 45% this year alone!

    Water bills have always flown under the radar to me, worth not switching
    to a meter in order to have freedom to use water without worrying about
    it, has everyone else's risen as much (on the old RV scheme)?

    Last time I looked it up 5+ years ago, the water rates for a similar neighbouring property were much higher than 'normal' consumption in a full house. Obviously usage will vary, but if you're just taking normal showers
    and baths and not watering the garden or filling pools, I suspect metering
    is going to be a good bit cheaper.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Johnson@21:1/5 to mills37.fslife@gmail.com on Thu May 29 17:46:35 2025
    On Wed, 28 May 2025 22:50:43 +0100, Roger Mills
    <mills37.fslife@gmail.com> wrote:



    My smart water meter (Severn Trent) is read at least once per hour -
    probably more frequently - because when I log on to my account I can
    display hour by hour usage over a 24 hour period.


    I've had a Severn Trent water meter since November 2023 and only
    recently learned of the existance of the usage tracker but am unable
    to access it. I've messaged ST to try and find out why. (They've just
    issued my first bill using a reading taken from the meter, 12 months
    since the last bill.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu May 29 17:37:30 2025
    On 29/05/2025 17:02, Theo wrote:
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people depending on >>> the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are only >>> 2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house).

    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern
    Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then
    subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.

    Do you need an 'official' meter (from the supplier, calibrated etc) or will they accept the reading from a third party meter?

    My meter was supplied by the plumber. It was this (the blue one for cold water): <https://ukwatermeter.co.uk/products/bmeters-gsd8-water-meter-single-jet-dry-dial>

    I guess you could supply and fit your own providing that it's WRAS approved.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Thu May 29 18:16:20 2025
    On 29/05/2025 15:40, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 12:41, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 09:00, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people
    depending on
    the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are
    only
    2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house).

    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern
    Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then
    subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.


    I didn't know that you could that. I must check whether STW does the
    same. As it happens, I *have* got a neter on my garden tap. I bought it
    originally to meter the whole house to see whether it was worth having
    an official fitted - which it was. When my meter became redundant for
    its original purpose, I moved it to the garden tap to keep an eye on how
    much I was using for watering.

    It's best to check by phoning STW. I can't remember how I discovered the sewerage allowance. I just searched the SW website and couldn't find it!
    Same with the STW website...

    It's not surprising they "hide" these things, as a lot of customers are paying well over the odds for something they're not using. :-(

    Do water companies assume that all you drink is pissed or shitted away?
    An unwarranted assumption on a number of grounds, apart from watering
    the garden.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Thu May 29 18:43:55 2025
    On 29/05/2025 18:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 15:40, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 12:41, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 09:00, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people
    depending on
    the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are
    only
    2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house).

    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago,
    and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern >>>> Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then >>>> subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.


    I didn't know that you could that. I must check whether STW does the
    same. As it happens, I *have* got a neter on my garden tap. I bought it
    originally to meter the whole house to see whether it was worth having
    an official fitted - which it was. When my meter became redundant for
    its original purpose, I moved it to the garden tap to keep an eye on how >>> much I was using for watering.

    It's best to check by phoning STW. I can't remember how I discovered the
    sewerage allowance. I just searched the SW website and couldn't find it!
    Same with the STW website...

    It's not surprising they "hide" these things, as a lot of customers are
    paying well over the odds for something they're not using. :-(

    Do water companies assume that all you drink is pissed or shitted away?
    An unwarranted assumption on a number of grounds, apart from watering
    the garden.

    No.

    Southern Water applies a 92.5% supply-to-waste calculation (I've no idea
    how they settled on this amount). So if your supply meter shows 100m^3
    was used, they assume that 92.5m^3 was treated as wastewater, and will
    charge for that amount.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to RJH on Thu May 29 20:13:29 2025
    On 28/05/2025 14:09, RJH wrote:
    On 28 May 2025 at 12:46:44 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 12:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water companies
    can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for
    maintenance/upgrades.
    Such a good plan it will never catch on...

    or nationalise. Just sent one of the perpetrators a letter:


    They were nationalised for centuries and after a big investment
    by the Victorians, subsequently little or nothing was spent and
    water bills were peanuts for far too long which didn't even
    cover running repairs, never mind improvements.

    All around the South coast, raw sewage was just dumped into the
    sea, and not even piped far enough out to prevent contamination
    of that bit of the sea just offshore. At least now some
    treatment is done and apart from after spells of heavy rain
    there seems to be less contamination of bathing water.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Thu May 29 20:17:17 2025
    On 29/05/2025 18:43, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 18:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 15:40, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 12:41, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 09:00, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people
    depending on
    the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are >>>>>> only
    2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house).

    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago, >>>>> and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern >>>>> Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then >>>>> subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The
    garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.


    I didn't know that you could that. I must check whether STW does the
    same. As it happens, I *have* got a neter on my garden tap. I bought it >>>> originally to meter the whole house to see whether it was worth having >>>> an official fitted - which it was. When my meter became redundant for
    its original purpose, I moved it to the garden tap to keep an eye on
    how
    much I was using for watering.

    It's best to check by phoning STW. I can't remember how I discovered the >>> sewerage allowance. I just searched the SW website and couldn't find it! >>> Same with the STW website...

    It's not surprising they "hide" these things, as a lot of customers are
    paying well over the odds for something they're not using. :-(

    Do water companies assume that all you drink is pissed or shitted away?
    An unwarranted assumption on a number of grounds, apart from watering
    the garden.

    No.

    Southern Water applies a 92.5% supply-to-waste calculation (I've no idea
    how they settled on this amount). So if your supply meter shows 100m^3
    was used, they assume that 92.5m^3 was treated as wastewater, and will
    charge for that amount.


    I thought you could have that 92.5% figure reduced if you could prove
    that you used more than the expected amount to water the garden.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Andrew on Thu May 29 22:05:38 2025
    On 29/05/2025 20:17, Andrew wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 18:43, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 18:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 15:40, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 12:41, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 09:00, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 22:50, Roger Mills wrote:

    Obviously, the ratio will be different for different people
    depending on
    the number of people in the house and the rateable value. There are >>>>>>> only
    2 of us, and our RV is relatively high (4-bedroom detached house). >>>>>>
    If you water the garden a lot, it's worth having a separate meter
    installed for the garden tap. I had one connected up a few years ago, >>>>>> and when I get the 6-monthly bill for the whole premises from Southern >>>>>> Water I ring them up and tell them the garden meter reading. They then >>>>>> subtract that from the sewerage charge and send me a new bill. The >>>>>> garden meter more than paid for itself in three years.


    I didn't know that you could that. I must check whether STW does the >>>>> same. As it happens, I *have* got a neter on my garden tap. I bought it >>>>> originally to meter the whole house to see whether it was worth having >>>>> an official fitted - which it was. When my meter became redundant for >>>>> its original purpose, I moved it to the garden tap to keep an eye on >>>>> how
    much I was using for watering.

    It's best to check by phoning STW. I can't remember how I discovered the >>>> sewerage allowance. I just searched the SW website and couldn't find it! >>>> Same with the STW website...

    It's not surprising they "hide" these things, as a lot of customers are >>>> paying well over the odds for something they're not using. :-(

    Do water companies assume that all you drink is pissed or shitted away?
    An unwarranted assumption on a number of grounds, apart from watering
    the garden.

    No.

    Southern Water applies a 92.5% supply-to-waste calculation (I've no idea
    how they settled on this amount). So if your supply meter shows 100m^3
    was used, they assume that 92.5m^3 was treated as wastewater, and will
    charge for that amount.


    I thought you could have that 92.5% figure reduced if you could prove
    that you used more than the expected amount to water the garden.

    Well, yes, that's what I do. They basically assume that everyone should
    be charged for 92.5% of supplied water treated as wastewater unless the customer can prove otherwise. See this page <https://www.southernwater.co.uk/help-and-support/average-water-use-and-cost/>.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri May 30 06:55:44 2025
    On 29 May 2025 at 20:13:29 BST, Andrew wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 14:09, RJH wrote:
    On 28 May 2025 at 12:46:44 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 12:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water companies >>>> can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for
    maintenance/upgrades.
    Such a good plan it will never catch on...

    or nationalise. Just sent one of the perpetrators a letter:


    They were nationalised for centuries and after a big investment
    by the Victorians,

    Well, mid-late 19C once the relationship between poor sanitation and disease had been established.

    subsequently little or nothing was spent and
    water bills were peanuts for far too long which didn't even
    cover running repairs, never mind improvements.

    Which makes mid-80s privatisation all the more daft.

    You're saying the water infrastructure in England/Wales received effectively
    no maintenance or improvement since say 1900? Interesting, did not know that. The same in Scotland - which is of course nationalised (and significantly less expensive than England)?

    Do you have a source of that info? I know a fair bit about 19C/early 20C and post privatisation, but very little about the bit in between.


    All around the South coast, raw sewage was just dumped into the
    sea, and not even piped far enough out to prevent contamination
    of that bit of the sea just offshore. At least now some
    treatment is done and apart from after spells of heavy rain
    there seems to be less contamination of bathing water.

    All of that still happens. Anyway, nationalisation and 'decent services' are not mutually exclusive. And I think privatisation has been given a decent run, and shown not to work.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri May 30 09:10:34 2025
    On 29/05/2025 20:13, Andrew wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 14:09, RJH wrote:
    On 28 May 2025 at 12:46:44 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 12:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water companies >>>> can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for
    maintenance/upgrades.
    Such a good plan it will never catch on...

    or nationalise. Just sent one of the perpetrators a letter:


    They were nationalised for centuries and after a big investment
    by the Victorians, subsequently little or nothing was spent and
    water bills were peanuts for far too long which didn't even
    cover running repairs, never mind improvements.

    All around the South coast, raw sewage was just dumped into the
    sea, and not even piped far enough out to prevent contamination
    of that bit of the sea just offshore. At least now some
    treatment is done and apart from after spells of heavy rain
    there seems to be less contamination of bathing water.






    That was the problem with a lot of Nationalised utilities. When things
    get politically tough it was too easy to "save money" by not investing
    in the infrastructure. By the time the shit hits the fan the likelihood
    was that the politician will have moved on and it was someone else's
    problem. When water was privatised there was a large amount of money
    required to repair a very leaky infrastructure in a very ageing system
    and the Government didn't have enough taxpayers money to do so. The
    solution was to privatise the system to use someone else's money.

    Another part of the problem is that the regulators have failed miserably
    to their jobs over rge decades. The same with the public facing part of
    the electricity industry - failing to vet "suppliers" that were not
    financially viable.

    The same with the public facing bit of the railways, decades of under investment resulted in many lines having rolling stock well past the
    sell by date. Even when some of this has been brought back into public ownership the warnings have been given is that fares will not reduce and
    much more money from ticket sales is needed for future investment.

    It was also the same with virtual monopoly industries. BT did not
    innovate anything for the Internet. If left up to them we would still be waiting for a 2400 baud rate dial up modem to be approved for connection
    to their copper. It was other companies that pushed the technology and
    how we connected, especially in the early days.

    Royal Mail reluctance to modernise 20/30 years ago helped with the
    luddite attitude by the unions has resulted in the mess it's in now and struggling to catch up with other players in the marketplace.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to RJH on Fri May 30 09:31:44 2025
    On 30/05/2025 07:55, RJH wrote:
    On 29 May 2025 at 20:13:29 BST, Andrew wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 14:09, RJH wrote:
    On 28 May 2025 at 12:46:44 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 12:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water companies >>>>> can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for
    maintenance/upgrades.
    Such a good plan it will never catch on...

    or nationalise. Just sent one of the perpetrators a letter:


    They were nationalised for centuries and after a big investment
    by the Victorians,

    Well, mid-late 19C once the relationship between poor sanitation and disease had been established.

    subsequently little or nothing was spent and
    water bills were peanuts for far too long which didn't even
    cover running repairs, never mind improvements.

    Which makes mid-80s privatisation all the more daft.

    You're saying the water infrastructure in England/Wales received effectively no maintenance or improvement since say 1900? Interesting, did not know that. The same in Scotland - which is of course nationalised (and significantly less
    expensive than England)?

    Do you have a source of that info? I know a fair bit about 19C/early 20C and post privatisation, but very little about the bit in between.


    All around the South coast, raw sewage was just dumped into the
    sea, and not even piped far enough out to prevent contamination
    of that bit of the sea just offshore. At least now some
    treatment is done and apart from after spells of heavy rain
    there seems to be less contamination of bathing water.

    All of that still happens. Anyway, nationalisation and 'decent services' are not mutually exclusive. And I think privatisation has been given a decent run,
    and shown not to work.


    Neither nationalisation nor privatisation 'work' for natural monopolies..

    Both lead to massive costs and poor service.

    To date the best option has been a very heavily regulated private
    monopoly like OFCOM has done for e.g. BT.

    The key to making a private water company work is to set legal limits on executive pay and dividends to be only exceeded if targets of quality
    and availability are met.

    The problem is that the management has no incentive to produce quality
    in a de facto monopoly. No matter who owns it.

    Natural market forces no longer work and artificial ones have to be
    created to provide real incentives.

    Its so blindingly simple that no politician dare think it.


    --
    The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly
    diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
    into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
    what it actually is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Roger Mills on Fri May 30 17:16:44 2025
    On Fri, 30 May 2025 14:42:14 +0100
    Roger Mills <mills37.fslife@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 29/05/2025 17:46, Peter Johnson wrote:
    On Wed, 28 May 2025 22:50:43 +0100, Roger Mills
    <mills37.fslife@gmail.com> wrote:



    My smart water meter (Severn Trent) is read at least once per hour
    - probably more frequently - because when I log on to my account I
    can display hour by hour usage over a 24 hour period.


    I've had a Severn Trent water meter since November 2023 and only
    recently learned of the existance of the usage tracker but am unable
    to access it. I've messaged ST to try and find out why. (They've
    just issued my first bill using a reading taken from the meter, 12
    months since the last bill.)

    Is it a *smart* meter? If not, they won't be able to read it remotely.

    When I had my first meter installed, I was told that it would be read
    remotely from a van parked in the area for a period of time. I was later upgraded to a 'smart' meter. This is Essex and Suffolk Water.
    The only sign of any antenna is a small lump sitting proud of the body
    of the meter casing.

    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 30 21:16:06 2025
    On 30/05/2025 09:10, alan_m wrote:
    On 29/05/2025 20:13, Andrew wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 14:09, RJH wrote:
    On 28 May 2025 at 12:46:44 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 28/05/2025 12:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Government needs to legislate so that instead of a fine water
    companies
    can be ordered to hold back dividends/bonuses and use them for
    maintenance/upgrades.
    Such a good plan it will never catch on...

    or nationalise. Just sent one of the perpetrators a letter:


    They were nationalised for centuries and after a big investment
    by the Victorians, subsequently little or nothing was spent and
    water bills were peanuts for far too long which didn't even
    cover running repairs, never mind improvements.

    All around the South coast, raw sewage was just dumped into the
    sea, and not even piped far enough out to prevent contamination
    of that bit of the sea just offshore. At least now some
    treatment is done and apart from after spells of heavy rain
    there seems to be less contamination of bathing water.






    That was the problem with a lot of Nationalised utilities.  When things
    get politically tough it was too easy to "save money" by not investing
    in the infrastructure. By the time the shit hits the fan the likelihood
    was that the politician will have moved on and it was someone else's
    problem. When water was privatised there was a large amount of money
    required to repair a very leaky infrastructure in a very ageing system
    and the Government didn't have enough taxpayers money to do so. The
    solution was to privatise the system to use someone else's money.

    The problem was consumers were not paying anywhere near the
    proper amount for using unlimited amounts of *treated, safe to drink*
    water, and in the case of industry, water that was not drunk anyway.

    The solution was to charge the consumers much more, but then the new
    problem was that too much was sucked out as dividends and sent to
    overseas owners and not spent on what it should have been spent on.

    Royal Mail reluctance to modernise 20/30 years ago helped with the
    luddite attitude by the unions has resulted in the mess it's in now and struggling to catch up with other players in the marketplace.


    To be fair, RM have created a commendable process of automated letter
    sorting and distribution, but sadly it has coincided with a massive
    collapse in domestic letter usage as email and electronic communication
    has taken over. Now add on a massive unionised work force who
    unsurprisingly are unwilling to change.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat May 31 00:29:31 2025
    On 30/05/2025 21:16, Andrew wrote:
    On 30/05/2025 09:10, alan_m wrote:

    Royal Mail reluctance to modernise 20/30 years ago helped with the
    luddite attitude by the unions has resulted in the mess it's in now
    and struggling to catch up with other players in the marketplace.


    To be fair, RM have created a commendable process of automated letter
    sorting and distribution, but sadly it has coincided with a massive
    collapse in domestic letter usage as email and electronic communication
    has taken over. Now add on a massive unionised work force who
    unsurprisingly are unwilling to change.

    Dinosaurs always die rather than change

    --
    If I had all the money I've spent on drink...
    ..I'd spend it on drink.

    Sir Henry (at Rawlinson's End)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat May 31 07:59:56 2025
    On 30/05/2025 21:16, Andrew wrote:

    To be fair, RM have created a commendable process of automated letter
    sorting and distribution, but sadly it has coincided with a massive
    collapse in domestic letter usage as email and electronic communication
    has taken over. Now add on a massive unionised work force who
    unsurprisingly are unwilling to change.

    The reluctance to change happened a long time before email became
    popular. I used to frequent a pub that was used by postal workers and
    they used to tell tales about how they screwed management and the system
    such as sending mail back through the system to be sorted multiple
    times. There could only be one outcome!


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Vir Campestris@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Jun 4 14:02:22 2025
    On 28/05/2025 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    I've got an acre and a half and a pond that needs topping up. And a
    private sewage treatment plant.

    I dont have a water meter 🙂

    My pond is fed with the water that lands on the garage roof. It's down
    quite a bit at the moment, but it's deep enough that that doesn't kill anything.

    (I can't feed it the water from the house - it's thatched)

    Andy

    --
    Do not listen to rumour, but, if you do, do not believe it.
    Ghandi.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Vir Campestris on Wed Jun 4 15:06:45 2025
    On 04/06/2025 14:02, Vir Campestris wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    I've got an acre and a half and a pond that needs topping up. And a
    private sewage treatment plant.

    I dont have a water meter 🙂

    My pond is fed with the water that lands on the garage roof. It's down
    quite a bit at the moment, but it's deep enough that that doesn't kill anything.

    (I can't feed it the water from the house - it's thatched)

    My pond gets all the water from my thatched house.
    There's a French drain all around the house that feeds it

    Andy


    --
    Those who want slavery should have the grace to name it by its proper
    name. They must face the full meaning of that which they are advocating
    or condoning; the full, exact, specific meaning of collectivism, of its
    logical implications, of the principles upon which it is based, and of
    the ultimate consequences to which these principles will lead. They must
    face it, then decide whether this is what they want or not.

    Ayn Rand.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jun 5 09:47:20 2025
    On 04/06/2025 15:06, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/06/2025 14:02, Vir Campestris wrote:
    On 28/05/2025 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    I've got an acre and a half and a pond that needs topping up. And a
    private sewage treatment plant.

    I dont have a water meter 🙂

    My pond is fed with the water that lands on the garage roof. It's down
    quite a bit at the moment, but it's deep enough that that doesn't kill
    anything.

    (I can't feed it the water from the house - it's thatched)

    My pond gets all the water from my thatched house.
    There's a French  drain all around the house that feeds it


    And here in far corner of SE Essex today the only real rain for around 6
    weeks. I've haven't had to cut the lawn in that time because it hasn't
    grown and 80% has turned brown with the lack of wate. The bit that is
    still green is mainly in the shade.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)