• Any other pensioners here?

    From Joe@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 12 17:53:01 2025
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to Joe on Thu Jun 12 18:06:03 2025
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:53:01 +0100, Joe <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    No, there are no pensioners on Newsgroups. It's a teenage thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Scott on Thu Jun 12 18:10:02 2025
    Scott wrote:

    Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    No, there are no pensioners on Newsgroups.
    And none of them get single-occupier discount either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Joe on Thu Jun 12 22:53:30 2025
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Thu Jun 12 22:32:00 2025
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    This mess is what happens when you elect a Labour government, in the end
    they will always run out of other people's money to spend.
    (Margaret Thatcher on her election in 1979)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Fri Jun 13 06:29:34 2025
    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently £9000 or £12000, depending on when you were born.

    The CT average band, average rate, is just over £2000.

    Something going on there . . .

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to RJH on Fri Jun 13 07:24:50 2025
    On 13/06/2025 in message <102ggge$3989e$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your >personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently £9000 or >£12000, depending on when you were born.

    The CT average band, average rate, is just over £2000.

    Something going on there . . .

    Oh dear, sorry :-)

    I managed to convert about £950 per 4 weeks to £2K per annum!

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    It may be that your sole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Fri Jun 13 08:51:00 2025
    On 13/06/2025 08:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I managed to convert about £950 per 4 weeks to £2K per annum!

    Ever thought about getting a job as a "creative accountant"? ;-)

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 09:43:53 2025
    On 13 Jun 2025 07:24:50 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com>
    wrote:

    On 13/06/2025 in message <102ggge$3989e$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your >>personal circumstances and council:
    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently £9000 or >>£12000, depending on when you were born.

    The CT average band, average rate, is just over £2000.

    Something going on there . . .

    Oh dear, sorry :-)

    I managed to convert about £950 per 4 weeks to £2K per annum!

    I thought you had five houses.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Fri Jun 13 09:56:38 2025
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and
    children in education.

    As you know.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Fri Jun 13 10:00:45 2025
    On 13/06/2025 08:51, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 08:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I managed to convert about £950 per 4 weeks  to £2K per annum!

    Ever thought about getting a job as a "creative accountant"? ;-)

    Belongs in Rachel Thieves position at the least
    --
    Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that
    doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that
    don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Joe on Fri Jun 13 10:04:07 2025
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and children in education.

    As you know.

    Indeed. Its hard to see *what* the council actually does beyond fail to
    mend potholes, block planning applications (except for wind turbines)
    and occasionally empty the bins.


    --
    Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that
    doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that
    don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 09:42:28 2025
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 18:10:02 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Scott wrote:

    Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    No, there are no pensioners on Newsgroups.
    And none of them get single-occupier discount either.

    I think they do - 25% discount for sole occupation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimW@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Fri Jun 13 10:50:32 2025
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Scott on Fri Jun 13 10:33:03 2025
    On 13/06/2025 09:42, Scott wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 18:10:02 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Scott wrote:

    Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    No, there are no pensioners on Newsgroups.
    And none of them get single-occupier discount either.

    I think they do - 25% discount for sole occupation.

    And possibly the same discount if you are on pension credit benefits.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Jun 13 11:13:47 2025
    On 13/06/2025 10:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 08:51, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 08:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I managed to convert about £950 per 4 weeks  to £2K per annum!

    Ever thought about getting a job as a "creative accountant"? ;-)

    Belongs in Rachel Thieves position at the least

    Here, St. Albans take £2300 out of my pocket per year. (10 monthly
    payments and mostly going to Herts. County Council!)

    Probably a couple of bands below normal because of restricted
    agricultural occupation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimW@21:1/5 to Joe on Fri Jun 13 10:56:15 2025
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and children in education.

    As you know.

    Nonsense. Pensioners might not need much education but they need a LOT
    of Social Care, which makes them as a group a very heavy burden on
    Council Budgets

    TW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tricky Dicky@21:1/5 to TimW on Fri Jun 13 10:28:23 2025
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and
    children in education.

    As you know.

    Nonsense. Pensioners might not need much education but they need a LOT
    of Social Care, which makes them as a group a very heavy burden on
    Council Budgets

    TW


    If only UK state pensions were as generous as most of western Europe then
    there would no need for WFA, pension credit or other discounts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Joe on Fri Jun 13 10:30:02 2025
    In article <20250613095638.431052c2@jrenewsid.jretrading.com>,
    Joe <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection

    I use the roads, too.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to charles on Fri Jun 13 12:02:35 2025
    On Fri, 13 Jun 25 10:30:02 UTC
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

    In article <20250613095638.431052c2@jrenewsid.jretrading.com>,
    Joe <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection

    I use the roads, too.


    Well down our way, the council spends no money on maintaining roads or pavements, and as a car owner, I pay the government many times over
    what is spent on my share of the road maintenance and provision.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Scott on Fri Jun 13 11:28:35 2025
    Scott wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Scott wrote:

    Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    No, there are no pensioners on Newsgroups.
    And none of them get single-occupier discount either.

    I think they do - 25% discount for sole occupation.

    If unicode included the SarcMarkâ„¢ I'd have used it ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to TimW on Fri Jun 13 12:30:01 2025
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they
    come to stay.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Jun 13 14:02:04 2025
    On 13/06/2025 10:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and
    children in education.

    As you know.

    Indeed. Its hard to see *what* the council actually does beyond fail to
    mend potholes, block planning applications (except for wind turbines)
    and occasionally empty the bins.


    So what about Schools, Adult Social Care, Childrens Social Care...
    .. as for blocking planning I understand there is a well defined process...

    1) Building firm applies for planning for 1000 houses on a plot the size
    of a football pitch.

    2) Council rejects on the grounds its over development, not enough green
    space etc.

    3) Builder submits revised plans for 998 houses. It was supposed to be
    999 but they put junior staff on planning who couldn't count.

    4) Council rejects again as its still over development....

    .. repeat above steps until either :-

    a) Council buckles under.
    b) Builder thinks its not over development and appeals.
    c) Builder declares bankruptcy.
    d) Greta discovers nest of rare newts.
    c) Some one thinks the can make more money building a non-christian
    community and religious centre..

    Not when "C" occurs the original plans get re-submitted and passed...

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to TimW on Fri Jun 13 14:06:10 2025
    On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:56:15 +0100, TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:

    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and
    children in education.

    As you know.

    Nonsense. Pensioners might not need much education but they need a LOT
    of Social Care, which makes them as a group a very heavy burden on
    Council Budgets

    Unless they take the necessary steps, those who are homeowners risk
    having to sell their homes to pay for that social care. It's not by
    any means a freebie for everyone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timatmarford@21:1/5 to charles on Fri Jun 13 14:14:57 2025
    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they come to stay.

    And their *live in* carers when needed.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to TimW on Fri Jun 13 15:35:52 2025
    On 13/06/2025 10:50 AM, TimW wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Fredxx wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live

    Do "young people who can't find a place to live" expect to be the
    householder of a "large house with loads of spare bedrooms" (I assume
    you mean two spare bedrooms)?

    - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    Is the council tax a charge for services (whether provided or
    unprovided), or is it the manifestation of an act of spite against
    people who have more money than... well... then you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to charles on Fri Jun 13 15:37:25 2025
    On 13/06/2025 12:30 PM, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they come to stay.

    But only to the extent that it is any of anyone else's business!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to TimW on Fri Jun 13 15:45:31 2025
    On 13/06/2025 10:50, TimW wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    Why should they give up their home, with all its memories; the
    neighbours who they know and who all help each other out; the space for
    hobbies in retirement, that they did not have the time for when working,
    nor the space when their children were still there; their lovingly
    tended garden, developed over decades; and the space to have their
    children and their spouses and children stay when they can get to visit
    - possibly from afar or even abroad?

    What extra council services do they use over that of a person living in
    a flat? In all likelihood they consume fewer services than those who
    have never bought a house, nor invested in their own future.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to TimW on Fri Jun 13 15:48:27 2025
    On 13/06/2025 10:56, TimW wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and
    children in education.

    As you know.

    Nonsense. Pensioners might not need much education but they need a LOT
    of Social Care, which makes them as a group a very heavy burden on
    Council Budgets

    Which is why Social Care should be removed from Council Tax and funded,
    as per need, from Central Government taxes/NHS funds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Fri Jun 13 15:31:55 2025
    On 13/06/2025 08:51 AM, Jeff Layman wrote:

    On 13/06/2025 08:24, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I managed to convert about £950 per 4 weeks to £2K per annum!

    Ever thought about getting a job as a "creative accountant"? ;-)

    Rachel the Chess Champion probably has a vacancy for him... !

    To say nowt of Diane Abbott.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimW@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Jun 14 13:50:05 2025
    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim the Geordie@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 18:08:24 2025
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking
    for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money,
    gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Sat Jun 14 18:35:49 2025
    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while >>>> young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount >>>> on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a >>>> running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they >>> come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking
    for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money, gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth
    another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that
    anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income. Sugar that
    how you will, it was a reduction in income. And all for being part of a demographic that didn't wholeheartedly support Labuor, the
    Anti-Pensioner Party.

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Jun 15 07:51:45 2025
    On 14 Jun 2025 at 18:35:49 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>>>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while >>>>> young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount >>>>> on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a >>>>> running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they >>>> come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking
    for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money,
    gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income. Sugar that
    how you will, it was a reduction in income. And all for being part of a demographic that didn't wholeheartedly support Labuor, the
    Anti-Pensioner Party.

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to pension-related benefits?

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "My humble friend, we know not how to live this life which is so short yet seek one that never ends."
    -- Anatole France

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 09:13:41 2025
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to pension-related benefits?

    Ah. More steal from the rich and give to the public sector eh?
    I think you belong in a communist country

    --
    The New Left are the people they warned you about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 10:08:20 2025
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:
    On 14 Jun 2025 at 18:35:49 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents. >>>>>>>
    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while >>>>>> young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount >>>>>> on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a >>>>>> running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the >>>>>> Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they >>>>> come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking >>> for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money,
    gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth
    another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that
    anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income. Sugar that
    how you will, it was a reduction in income. And all for being part of a
    demographic that didn't wholeheartedly support Labuor, the
    Anti-Pensioner Party.

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were
    planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to pension-related benefits?


    I think many on incomes of that size have draw-down pension funds so can
    adjust their income to keep it below £100k. They probably do that anyway
    to avoid the high tax rates on high income.

    Dave

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 09:13:49 2025
    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were >>planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could
    be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, >those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to >pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions for
    36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Most people have heard of Karl Marx the philosopher but few know of his
    sister Onya the Olympic runner.
    Her name is still mentioned at the start of every race.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Philosopher on Sun Jun 15 09:15:06 2025
    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lvbl$psua$1@dont-email.me> The Natural
    Philosopher wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could >>be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, >>those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to >>pension-related benefits?

    Ah. More steal from the rich and give to the public sector eh?
    I think you belong in a communist country

    We were taught at school that socialism doesn't work, this is a good
    example of why.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    The true meaning of life is to plant trees under whose shade you do not
    expect to sit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 09:15:01 2025
    In article <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me>, RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 14 Jun 2025 at 18:35:49 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>, TimW
    <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx
    wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents. >>>>>>
    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms
    while young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a >>>>> discount on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses?
    They can take a running jump and move to a nice little flat if they >>>>> don't like the Council tax. TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when >>>> they come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't
    expect the government to subsidise me. Before winter fuel payments
    came along I managed. Then the 'nice' government of the day gave me
    some money every winter, without me asking for it. I didn't need it,
    but it seemed rude not to take it. Then the 'nasty' government stopped
    giving me it. Where's my money they all cried. My granny gave me
    pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have refused it, but
    she would have been offended. If one day she had not given me the
    money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money, gran!" Sort
    of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income. Sugar that
    how you will, it was a reduction in income. And all for being part of a demographic that didn't wholeheartedly support Labuor, the
    Anti-Pensioner Party.

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could
    be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement
    to pension-related benefits?

    It is taxable, you know?

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 10:27:33 2025
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to pension related benefits.




    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adrian Caspersz@21:1/5 to Joe on Sun Jun 15 10:36:42 2025
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and children in education.

    As you know.


    Some I know are falling over, practically housebound, heavily reliant on
    social services, comes out of council taxes.


    I don't have kids and am not an active user of nuclear weapons.

    Can I have a rebate on service provided for that?

    --
    Adrian C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 10:58:44 2025
    On 15/06/2025 08:51 AM, RJH wrote:
    On 14 Jun 2025 at 18:35:49 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents. >>>>>>>
    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while >>>>>> young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount >>>>>> on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a >>>>>> running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the >>>>>> Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they >>>>> come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking >>> for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money,
    gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth
    another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that
    anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income. Sugar that
    how you will, it was a reduction in income. And all for being part of a
    demographic that didn't wholeheartedly support Labuor, the
    Anti-Pensioner Party.

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were
    planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be open to means testing?

    Absolutely not. The state pension is not a means-tested benefit and was
    never intended to be one, right back to Lloyd-George. Making it
    means-tested (and doing that to the WFA was the first step on that road)
    would be a breach of contract. The whole idea is that a pensioner gets
    state pension (circa £10,000 to c. £11500, depending on whether it is
    the "old" or "new" pension) and arranges other income to boost it up to
    a level on which they can live, via a private or work pension,
    investments or even work after the age of retirement.

    Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to pension-related benefits?

    That already happens with Pension Credit (the latest incarnation of
    National Assistance, Supplementary Pension, Income Support). One's
    income has to be quite low (in modern terms) in order to be entitled to
    that.

    But why this obsession with rich people getting what they too have paid
    in for via a lifetime of National Insurance?

    It's not as though they won't be paying 45% of it straight back in
    income tax, is it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 15 11:00:29 2025
    On 15/06/2025 10:27 AM, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to pension related benefits.

    You must mean the means-tested Pension Credit.

    Savings don't affect the ordinary State Pension, and neither should they.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tricky Dicky@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Jun 15 10:31:29 2025
    JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 10:27 AM, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to
    pension related benefits.

    You must mean the means-tested Pension Credit.

    Savings don't affect the ordinary State Pension, and neither should they.


    When it comes to care costs savings do matter. My mother had to pay her
    total care costs of £1800 per month until her assets diminished to £23250
    at which point she got assistance with the costs on a sliding scale until
    she hit if I recall assets of £8450 at which point all her care costs were
    met by the local council. Basically you are left with enough money to be
    buried and mark your grave.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 15 10:36:23 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:27:33 BST, alan_m wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be >> open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, >> those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to pension related benefits.

    Ah OK, didn't know that. Do you have link etc?
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 15 10:38:56 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were
    planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could
    be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, >> those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions for
    36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth to yourselves, fill your boots.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "If all the economists in the world were laid end-to-end, they would still not reach a conclusion." -- unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Jun 15 10:39:25 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:15:01 BST, charles wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could
    be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement
    to pension-related benefits?

    It is taxable, you know?

    Yes, thanks.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Tricky Dicky on Sun Jun 15 11:41:12 2025
    On 15/06/2025 11:31 AM, Tricky Dicky wrote:

    JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 10:27 AM, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a
    simple way - say, those with a declared income >100k or savings
    1m lose entitlement to pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to >>> pension related benefits.

    You must mean the means-tested Pension Credit.
    Savings don't affect the ordinary State Pension, and neither should they.

    When it comes to care costs savings do matter.

    I am sure you are right.

    But that is nothing to do with the State Pension.

    My mother had to pay her
    total care costs of £1800 per month until her assets diminished to £23250 at which point she got assistance with the costs on a sliding scale until
    she hit if I recall assets of £8450 at which point all her care costs were met by the local council. Basically you are left with enough money to be buried and mark your grave.

    The source of much dissatisfaction, I agree. But not the result of any
    State Pension rule. It is all within a completely separate set of rules operated by county level local authorities, not the DWP.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Jun 15 10:44:59 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:58:44 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 08:51 AM, RJH wrote:
    On 14 Jun 2025 at 18:35:49 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says... >>>>>
    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents. >>>>>>>>
    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while >>>>>>> young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount >>>>>>> on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a >>>>>>> running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the >>>>>>> Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when they
    come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it >>>>> was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect >>>> the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking >>>> for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they >>>> all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money, >>>> gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth
    another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that >>> anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income. Sugar that
    how you will, it was a reduction in income. And all for being part of a
    demographic that didn't wholeheartedly support Labuor, the
    Anti-Pensioner Party.

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were
    planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be >> open to means testing?

    Absolutely not. The state pension is not a means-tested benefit and was
    never intended to be one, right back to Lloyd-George. Making it
    means-tested (and doing that to the WFA was the first step on that road) would be a breach of contract. The whole idea is that a pensioner gets
    state pension (circa £10,000 to c. £11500, depending on whether it is
    the "old" or "new" pension) and arranges other income to boost it up to
    a level on which they can live, via a private or work pension,
    investments or even work after the age of retirement.

    Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    That already happens with Pension Credit (the latest incarnation of
    National Assistance, Supplementary Pension, Income Support). One's
    income has to be quite low (in modern terms) in order to be entitled to
    that.

    But why this obsession with rich people getting what they too have paid
    in for via a lifetime of National Insurance?


    OK fine! Just my opinion, and I disagree with you. Quite why I disagree with you is a bit beyond discussion here.

    It's not as though they won't be paying 45% of it straight back in
    income tax, is it?

    No. FYI they only pay the higher rate on taxable income above £125,140.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 11:11:54 2025
    On 15/06/2025 in message <102m7s0$rtsn$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were >>>>planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could >>>be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - >>>say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to >>>pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions for >>36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some >redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth to >yourselves, fill your boots.

    I, and many others like me, had parents who worked their socks off to
    ensure I got a decent education and I benefited from the 11 plus and
    grammar school system. I was only educated to O-level standard but in a 36
    year career I spent 12 tears studying in my own time to get professional qualifications.

    Any fat-arsed, scrounging socialist scumbag who thinks it's OK to just
    take that from me had better be ready for a fight.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    You can't tell which way the train went by looking at the tracks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Jun 15 11:30:02 2025
    In article <mb7jttFqum5U2@mid.individual.net>,
    JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 10:27 AM, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to pension related benefits.

    You must mean the means-tested Pension Credit.

    Savings don't affect the ordinary State Pension, and neither should they.

    Saving don't, but the interest from the savings might. Depends on how much
    you have got saved.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Jun 15 13:50:24 2025
    On 15/06/2025 11:30 AM, charles wrote:

    JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 10:27 AM, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a
    simple way - say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m
    lose entitlement to pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to >>> pension related benefits.

    You must mean the means-tested Pension Credit.
    Savings don't affect the ordinary State Pension, and neither should they.

    Saving don't, but the interest from the savings might. Depends on how much you have got saved.

    No, not at all.

    The State Pension is simply not means-tested.

    It never has been.

    But it *is* taxable, and the recipt of savings interest brings one
    nearer, or further into, taxation (a good reason to use an ISA if possible).

    That isn't a rule within the State Pension scheme. It's an income tax
    rule within the world of the Finance Acts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Harry Bloomfield Esq@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Sun Jun 15 14:48:25 2025
    On 14/06/2025 18:08, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking
    for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.

    Very few, live in a large empty nest, and many were already struggling
    to afford to just heat and eat in a 'small empty nest'. The WFP, over
    time, became a necessary part of the pension, as costs increased, over
    the years. UK pensions, are some of the worst in the EU, and we also
    live in one of the colder parts, with generally the worst insulated
    homes, and the most expensive energy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sun Jun 15 14:37:31 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 12:11:54 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102m7s0$rtsn$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were >>>>> planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could >>>> be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions for >>> 36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some
    redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth to >> yourselves, fill your boots.

    I, and many others like me, had parents who worked their socks off to
    ensure I got a decent education and I benefited from the 11 plus and
    grammar school system. I was only educated to O-level standard but in a 36 year career I spent 12 tears studying in my own time to get professional qualifications.

    Not everybody has had your life advantages. Sounds as though you feel that the UK is pretty meritocratic, and opportunities are equal. I disagree, but hey.


    Any fat-arsed, scrounging socialist scumbag who thinks it's OK to just
    take that from me had better be ready for a fight.

    Nice.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "If economists were held in the same regard as medical
    practitioners, our courts would be overwhelmed with malpractice suits" -- unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 16:15:28 2025
    On 15/06/2025 in message <102mlrb$vc6t$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 12:11:54 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102m7s0$rtsn$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were >>>>>>planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits >>>>>could
    be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - >>>>>say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to >>>>>pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions >>>>for
    36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some >>>redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth >>>to
    yourselves, fill your boots.

    I, and many others like me, had parents who worked their socks off to >>ensure I got a decent education and I benefited from the 11 plus and >>grammar school system. I was only educated to O-level standard but in a 36 >>year career I spent 12 tears studying in my own time to get professional >>qualifications.

    Not everybody has had your life advantages. Sounds as though you feel that >the
    UK is pretty meritocratic, and opportunities are equal. I disagree, but
    hey.

    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are life advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.


    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    By the time you can make ends meet they move the ends

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Jun 15 17:31:59 2025
    On 14/06/2025 18:35, JNugent wrote:
    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
         TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx
    wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms
    while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a discount >>>>> on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a >>>>> running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when
    they
    come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking
    for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money,
    gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income.

    Nonsense. The triple lock meant that pensioners did far better
    over the last 25 years than low income workers did.

    The WFA was simply a bribe by Gordon Brown to buy pensioners votes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Jun 15 17:44:52 2025
    On 15/06/2025 10:15, charles wrote:
    In article <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me>, RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
    On 14 Jun 2025 at 18:35:49 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says... >>>>>
    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>, TimW
    <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx >>>>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents. >>>>>>>>
    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms >>>>>>> while young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a >>>>>>> discount on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses?
    They can take a running jump and move to a nice little flat if they >>>>>>> don't like the Council tax. TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren when >>>>>> they come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it >>>>> was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't
    expect the government to subsidise me. Before winter fuel payments
    came along I managed. Then the 'nice' government of the day gave me
    some money every winter, without me asking for it. I didn't need it,
    but it seemed rude not to take it. Then the 'nasty' government stopped >>>> giving me it. Where's my money they all cried. My granny gave me
    pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have refused it, but
    she would have been offended. If one day she had not given me the
    money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money, gran!" Sort >>>> of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension (worth
    another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was something that >>> anyone would have included when stating what their annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income. Sugar that
    how you will, it was a reduction in income. And all for being part of a
    demographic that didn't wholeheartedly support Labuor, the
    Anti-Pensioner Party.

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were
    planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could
    be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say, those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement
    to pension-related benefits?

    It is taxable, you know?


    And some.

    After April 2027, unspent pensions will be taxed at 40%, like all
    other assets liable to IHT.

    If the deceased is over 75 then the residual 60% will be distributed
    according to the will and the beneficiaries will have their share
    added to their income for that tax year. This could result in a
    further 45% tax being deducted.

    OTOH, farmers will only have to pay 20% and they have 10 years to pay
    it, while the executor of someone with an unspent SIPP will have to
    pay the 40% IHT within 6 months, BUT the money is under the control of
    the SIPP manager and they cannot release it until probate has been
    granted, BUT probate cannot be granted until after IHT has been paid.

    Expect an utter meltdown of the probate system from April 6th 2027.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Jun 15 17:49:32 2025
    On 13/06/2025 15:35, JNugent wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 10:50 AM, TimW wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Fredxx wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live

    Do "young people who can't find a place to live" expect to be the
    householder of a "large house with loads of spare bedrooms" (I assume
    you mean two spare bedrooms)?

    - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    Is the council tax a charge for services (whether provided or
    unprovided), or is it the manifestation of an act of spite against
    people who have more money than... well... then you?


    In many areas, as much as 25% of council tax receipts simply pays
    the gold-plated pensions of retired council employees.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 17:26:42 2025
    On 13/06/2025 07:29, RJH wrote:
    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently £9000 or £12000, depending on when you were born.

    Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?, and also on the *number of years* NI credits that you have
    earned (35 needed post-2016), and then take account of the number
    of years that you were contracted-out of SERPS, which is most public
    service employees. They sacrifice some of their state pension
    (= Contracted Out Deduction) but get far more from their occupational
    pension (paid from 60?) than they 'lose' from the COD.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 17:37:52 2025
    On 15/06/2025 15:37, RJH wrote:
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 12:11:54 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102m7s0$rtsn$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower were >>>>>> planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could >>>>> be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - >>>>> say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to >>>>> pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions for >>>> 36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some >>> redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth to >>> yourselves, fill your boots.

    I, and many others like me, had parents who worked their socks off to
    ensure I got a decent education and I benefited from the 11 plus and
    grammar school system. I was only educated to O-level standard but in a 36 >> year career I spent 12 tears studying in my own time to get professional
    qualifications.

    Not everybody has had your life advantages.

    Apart from those kids who ?benefited from a private-school
    education, *everyone* had the same opportunities. If
    far too many simply dreamed through school and didn't bother
    (or worse still spent their school days actually interfering
    with those fellow pupils who wanted to make an effort) then
    that is their problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Tricky Dicky on Sun Jun 15 17:56:23 2025
    On 13/06/2025 11:28, Tricky Dicky wrote:
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and
    children in education.

    As you know.

    Nonsense. Pensioners might not need much education but they need a LOT
    of Social Care, which makes them as a group a very heavy burden on
    Council Budgets

    TW


    If only UK state pensions were as generous as most of western Europe then there would no need for WFA, pension credit or other discounts


    If only UK pensioners and their employers had paid the sort of
    social taxes that actually fund those mythical generous EU pensions
    then there wouldn't be a problem. UK voters preferred 'low' taxes
    and rampant house prices instead.

    If only all those EU countries had actually paid their 2% nato
    subs for the last 70+ years, instead of giving their voters lavish
    pensions (but NO unlimited 'free' NHS, like the UK) and relying
    on the USA for protection.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Jun 15 17:59:09 2025
    On 13/06/2025 11:30, charles wrote:
    In article <20250613095638.431052c2@jrenewsid.jretrading.com>,
    Joe <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection

    I use the roads, too.


    But your EV doesn't attract car 'tax' (yet) and you avoid paying
    fuel duty too, plus the 20% vat thereon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to SteveW on Sun Jun 15 17:57:43 2025
    On 13/06/2025 15:48, SteveW wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 10:56, TimW wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 09:56, Joe wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection and a few glimmers of light. The big users of council
    services are former council employees, those who don't own houses and
    children in education.

    As you know.

    Nonsense. Pensioners might not need much education but they need a LOT
    of Social Care, which makes them as a group a very heavy burden on
    Council Budgets

    Which is why Social Care should be removed from Council Tax and funded,
    as per need, from Central Government taxes/NHS funds.


    And the cost would be balanced by cutting the 'rate support grant'
    anyway, so council tax would probably go up and not down.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Smolley@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jun 15 17:20:47 2025
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:38:56 +0000, RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower
    were planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a
    simple way - say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions
    for 36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth
    to yourselves, fill your boots.

    I had been an agency worker from 1962 to 2003, had a bit of a heart do, so
    I had to retire. I didn't bother with a long term pension, but I try one
    in 1970, but it only lasted for a month. I subsequently forgot about it,
    until I was sent a cheque for £2500 in 2006.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun Jun 15 18:22:44 2025
    Andrew wrote:

    But your EV doesn't attract car 'tax' (yet)

    Tax renewal on EVs has been £195 since April.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun Jun 15 18:30:02 2025
    In article <102mu4s$vs8t$8@dont-email.me>,
    Andrew <Andrew97d@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 11:30, charles wrote:
    In article <20250613095638.431052c2@jrenewsid.jretrading.com>,
    Joe <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:53:30 +0100
    Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.



    Is that liquid wealth or do you mean the houses they live in?

    Children, grandchildren etc. never stop being dependants.

    Pensioners use virtually no council services, just the odd bin
    collection

    I use the roads, too.


    But your EV doesn't attract car 'tax' (yet) and you avoid paying
    fuel duty too, plus the 20% vat thereon.

    Only if you are charging the EV at home. Use a public charger and you pay
    20% VAT

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 01:00:35 2025
    On 15/06/2025 05:26 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 07:29, RJH wrote:
    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your
    personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/


    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently
    £9000 or
    £12000, depending on when you were born.

    Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?,

    Not.

    The deciding factor is the date on which the citizen reached pension age (whether or not retired).

    So "depending on when you were born" was perfectly correct.

    and also on the *number of years* NI credits that you have
    earned (35 needed post-2016), and then take account of the number
    of years that you were contracted-out of SERPS, which is most public
    service employees. They sacrifice some of their state pension
    (= Contracted Out Deduction) but get far more from their occupational
    pension (paid from 60?) than they 'lose' from the COD.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to charles on Mon Jun 16 01:01:47 2025
    On 15/06/2025 12:30, charles wrote:
    In article <mb7jttFqum5U2@mid.individual.net>,
    JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 10:27 AM, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way -
    say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to >>> pension related benefits.

    You must mean the means-tested Pension Credit.

    Savings don't affect the ordinary State Pension, and neither should they.

    Saving don't, but the interest from the savings might. Depends on how much you have got saved.


    The actual amount of savings do as well for things like means tested
    pension credit

    The amount of savings (over £10k) is taken into consideration when
    determining if someone is eligible for the pension credit top up. Every
    £500 of savings (above the 10K) is considered to be income of £1 a week.

    There is a raft of other state benefits that are not taken into
    consideration as income to determine eligible for the top up.

    Being granted pension credit may also give other state benefits.



    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 00:27:38 2025
    On 15/06/2025 15:37, RJH wrote:

    Not everybody has had your life advantages. Sounds as though you feel that the
    UK is pretty meritocratic, and opportunities are equal. I disagree, but hey.


    There are also life choices by people who had the same background,
    education and opportunities that result in vastly different pensions.
    Why should someone who made provision for their retirement be penalised
    for doing so? How do you differentiate between those truly
    disadvantaged in life and those who could, but didn't, make a modest
    provision for retirement? Currently the benefit system seems to make no distinction.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 01:06:23 2025
    On 15/06/2025 05:31 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 14/06/2025 18:35, JNugent wrote:
    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...

    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
    TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx
    wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents. >>>>>>>
    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms
    while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a
    discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can
    take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the >>>>>> Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren
    when they
    come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it
    was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect
    the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me asking >>> for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they
    all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money,
    gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension
    (worth another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was
    something that anyone would have included when stating what their
    annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income.

    Nonsense. The triple lock meant that pensioners did far better
    over the last 25 years than low income workers did.

    Are you REALLY trying to claim that a reduction in pensioner income was
    not a reduction in pensioner income? :-)

    The WFA was simply a bribe by Gordon Brown to buy pensioners votes.

    He might have had that as an aim (who knows?), but the factual reality
    was that over the period of the very late 1980s through to the date when
    the WFA was instituted, the assistance available with heating costs (via
    the Social Fund) was dependent upon weather station measurements in the
    region where you lived and very winter, some people got payments while
    others didn't, with consequent annual "hilarity" on the letters page of
    the Guardian, etc. The WFA was at least partly a measure designed to
    obviate that yearly trial for the government.

    But you probably didn't know that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 01:07:55 2025
    On 15/06/2025 05:49 PM, Andrew wrote:

    On 13/06/2025 15:35, JNugent wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 10:50 AM, TimW wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Fredxx wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms while
    young people can't find a place to live

    Do "young people who can't find a place to live" expect to be the
    householder of a "large house with loads of spare bedrooms" (I assume
    you mean two spare bedrooms)?

    - and now they want a discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the
    Council tax.
    TW

    Is the council tax a charge for services (whether provided or
    unprovided), or is it the manifestation of an act of spite against
    people who have more money than... well... then you?

    In many areas, as much as 25% of council tax receipts simply pays
    the gold-plated pensions of retired council employees.

    How does that answer my question?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 01:36:09 2025
    On 15/06/2025 11:36, RJH wrote:
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:27:33 BST, alan_m wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, >>> those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to
    pension related benefits.

    Ah OK, didn't know that. Do you have link etc?

    Pension credit tops up a pension for a single person if the pension
    plus other income is less than £11.8K/year,

    For the purposes of this means tested benefit savings of £1 million
    count as an income of around £103K/year (not counting any interest)

    https://www.gov.uk/pension-credit/eligibility
    Under the paragraph "Your savings and investments" Note the income
    amounts they assume is per week.

    What doesn't count as income to claim pension credit is other means
    tested state benefits.



    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 01:43:07 2025
    On 15/06/2025 17:31, Andrew wrote:


    Nonsense. The triple lock meant that pensioners did far better
    over the last 25 years than low income workers did.

    The WFA was simply a bribe by Gordon Brown to buy pensioners votes.


    And Gordon Brown tax raid on pension pot dividends is the reason many
    pension are a lot worse than they would have been. Without this many
    pensioners would have been better off and the Government would now be benefitting from higher income tax revenues. :)


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 07:33:07 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 17:26:42 BST, Andrew wrote:

    On 13/06/2025 07:29, RJH wrote:
    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your
    personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently £9000 or >> £12000, depending on when you were born.

    Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?,

    Really? I thought it was age related. Have you got a link please?

    and also on the *number of years* NI credits that you have
    earned (35 needed post-2016), and then take account of the number
    of years that you were contracted-out of SERPS, which is most public
    service employees. They sacrifice some of their state pension
    (= Contracted Out Deduction) but get far more from their occupational
    pension (paid from 60?) than they 'lose' from the COD.

    Indeed. That's why I gave figures for a *full* state pension, on the
    assumption that that was what Jeff was referring to.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "Men who believe absurdities will commit atrocities."
    -- Voltaire

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 07:42:29 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 17:37:52 BST, Andrew wrote:

    Not everybody has had your life advantages.

    Apart from those kids who ?benefited from a private-school
    education, *everyone* had the same opportunities. If
    far too many simply dreamed through school and didn't bother
    (or worse still spent their school days actually interfering
    with those fellow pupils who wanted to make an effort) then
    that is their problem.

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance, disability (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and homophobia (for example) in
    UK society? And those characteristics can work against, say, a job applicant
    or a child at school despite laws and policies in place to prevent discrimination?

    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.

    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an alternative view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The Rise of Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Smolley on Mon Jun 16 07:47:03 2025
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 18:20:47 BST, Smolley wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:38:56 +0000, RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower
    were planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a
    simple way - say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions
    for 36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some
    redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth
    to yourselves, fill your boots.

    I had been an agency worker from 1962 to 2003, had a bit of a heart do, so
    I had to retire. I didn't bother with a long term pension, but I try one
    in 1970, but it only lasted for a month. I subsequently forgot about it, until I was sent a cheque for £2500 in 2006.

    Similar - but not quite as good! My mum pressurised me into taking out a pension 40 years ago. I paid into it for about a year, about £500. Worth £8000
    now, were I to cash it in.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "There is no housing shortage in Lincoln today - just a
    rumour that is put about by people who have nowhere to
    live." -- G.L. Murfin, Mayor of Lincoln

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 08:54:41 2025
    On 15/06/2025 11:38, RJH wrote:
    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some redress won't do any harm.

    Hey rob.

    Which you like to be :

    (a) as poor as your neighbour?

    (b) poorer than your neighbour, but richer than you otherwise would be?

    --
    In todays liberal progressive conflict-free education system, everyone
    gets full Marx.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 16 07:49:52 2025
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 01:36:09 BST, alan_m wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 11:36, RJH wrote:
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:27:33 BST, alan_m wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 08:51, RJH wrote:

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits could be
    open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a simple way - say, >>>> those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to
    pension-related benefits?

    Those with income of >100k already pay back the amount of the state
    pension in the way of income tax.

    Those with savings _WAY LESS_ than 1 million already lose entitlement to >>> pension related benefits.

    Ah OK, didn't know that. Do you have link etc?

    Pension credit tops up a pension for a single person if the pension
    plus other income is less than £11.8K/year,

    For the purposes of this means tested benefit savings of £1 million
    count as an income of around £103K/year (not counting any interest)

    https://www.gov.uk/pension-credit/eligibility
    Under the paragraph "Your savings and investments" Note the income
    amounts they assume is per week.

    What doesn't count as income to claim pension credit is other means
    tested state benefits.

    Ah yes, thanks, I had in my head you were referring to the state pension,
    which isn't means tested. Associated benefits are, of course.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 09:04:25 2025
    On 15/06/2025 17:37, Andrew wrote:
    (or worse still spent their school days actually interfering
    with those fellow pupils who wanted to make an effort) then
    that is their problem.

    Gosh,. How 'far right' of you.
    Don't you know that people are *not responsible* for being fat arsed
    lazy shits.
    They were *born that way*.
    (Except that all men are created equal. Or something)
    So its up to you to look after them because you were born intelligent
    and active?

    --
    There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do
    that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon
    emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent renewable energy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Mon Jun 16 08:59:34 2025
    On 15/06/2025 17:15, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are life advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.

    It is.
    Remember the basic tenets of Marxism:

    Anyone who has more than you is privileged.
    You are poor because you are oppressed.
    So there is no point in working to better yourself. Only in working to
    take away their money


    --
    When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over
    the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that
    authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

    Frédéric Bastiat

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 09:16:46 2025
    On 16/06/2025 08:42, RJH wrote:

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance, disability (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and homophobia (for example) in UK society? And those characteristics can work against, say, a job applicant or a child at school despite laws and policies in place to prevent discrimination?

    So can being a fat arsed lazy slob with no personal hygiene

    Don't you think that a deaf dumb and blind idiot with no education
    should be allowed to operate on your brain, because herai8ng, speech,
    sight, and intelligence are all 'privilege'

    Christ on a bike, discrimination is how you *choose* a person for a job.

    And you take *everything * into account that is relevant to the job.


    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.


    Of *course* not everybody has the same opportunities. Are you mental?
    I am not built like a Kenyan long distance runner. I have standards of
    moral behaviour, so I could never be a Labour politician.


    Discrimination is what enables you tell food from poison, light from
    dark, Your mother from your girlfriend...

    If you want a world without discrimination try being an amoeba.


    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an alternative view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The Rise of Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.


    Oh gawd.
    Try this, instead.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsdsK-Am0WY

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as
    foolish, and by the rulers as useful.

    (Seneca the Younger, 65 AD)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jun 16 11:16:57 2025
    On 16/06/2025 08:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 17:15, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are life
    advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.

    It is.
    Remember the basic tenets of Marxism:

    Anyone who has more than you is privileged.
    You are poor because you are oppressed.
    So there is no point in working to better yourself. Only in working to
    take away their money

    I thought it was, "To those, according to their needs; from those,
    according to their abilities"?


    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 11:27:49 2025
    On 16/06/2025 08:47, RJH wrote:

    I had been an agency worker from 1962 to 2003, had a bit of a heart do, so >> I had to retire. I didn't bother with a long term pension, but I try one
    in 1970, but it only lasted for a month. I subsequently forgot about it,
    until I was sent a cheque for £2500 in 2006.

    Similar - but not quite as good! My mum pressurised me into taking out a pension 40 years ago. I paid into it for about a year, about £500. Worth £8000
    now, were I to cash it in.

    I had a job 40 years before retirement for a period around 1.5 years and
    my the salary was commensurate with a very junior member of staff in an industry that paid skilled workers around the average industrial wage.
    My compulsory pension contribution was taken from my pay packet.

    Some time later the pension scheme was wound up at a time when it had a
    large surplus which was distributed to pension members before being held
    by a third party financial institution as pension pot that couldn't be
    taken until state retirement age. 40+ years later it has given me a
    pension of £3k per year albeit with future payments not linked to
    inflation above 2%??

    This has to be put into context as a lot of today's value of the pension
    is due to it being invested as inflation would have reduced the initial
    amount in the pot by at least 8x, and in my case the distribution of the surplus.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Mon Jun 16 11:33:39 2025
    On 16/06/2025 11:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 08:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 17:15, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are life
    advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.

    It is.
    Remember the basic tenets of Marxism:

    Anyone who has more than you is privileged.
    You are poor because you are oppressed.
    So there is no point in working to better yourself. Only in working to
    take away their money

    I thought it was, "To those, according to their needs; from those,
    according to their abilities"?


    It might have started that way, but the weaponized version that today'
    Leftists use to wreck everything is as I said.


    --
    I would rather have questions that cannot be answered...
    ...than to have answers that cannot be questioned

    Richard Feynman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jun 16 13:40:29 2025
    On 16/06/2025 09:16 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 08:42, RJH wrote:

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance,
    disability (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and
    homophobia (for example) in UK society? And those characteristics
    can work against, say, a job applicant or a child at school despite
    laws and policies in place to prevent discrimination?

    So can being a fat arsed lazy slob with no personal hygiene

    Don't you think that a deaf dumb and blind idiot with no education
    should be allowed to operate on your brain, because herai8ng, speech,
    sight, and intelligence are all 'privilege'

    Christ on a bike, discrimination is how you *choose* a person for a job.

    And you take *everything * into account that is relevant to the job.

    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.

    Of *course* not everybody has the same opportunities. Are you mental?
    I am not built like a Kenyan long distance runner. I have standards of
    moral behaviour, so I could never be a Labour politician.

    Discrimination is what enables you tell food from poison, light from
    dark, Your mother from your girlfriend...

    If you want a world without discrimination try being an amoeba.

    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an
    alternative view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The
    Rise of Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.

    Oh gawd.
    Try this, instead.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsdsK-Am0WY

    The best post of yours I've ever seen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 13:37:03 2025
    On 16/06/2025 08:42 AM, RJH wrote:
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 17:37:52 BST, Andrew wrote:

    Not everybody has had your life advantages.

    Apart from those kids who ?benefited from a private-school
    education, *everyone* had the same opportunities. If
    far too many simply dreamed through school and didn't bother
    (or worse still spent their school days actually interfering
    with those fellow pupils who wanted to make an effort) then
    that is their problem.

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance, disability (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and homophobia (for example) in UK society?

    Those things can be found in *people* *in* *the* *UK*.

    They are members of society, of course. But that does not mean that the
    society in the aggregate subscribes to any or all of those things.
    Thet's because there are also people who don't practise them.

    And those characteristics can work against, say, a job applicant
    or a child at school despite laws and policies in place to prevent discrimination?

    There are no laws to prevent discrimination in general and neither
    should there be. Selecting applicants for any job necessarily INVOLVES discrimination, if only against the under-qualified or the over-qualified.

    When the NHS is appointing surgeons, you want the not-so-competent and
    the incompetent to be discriminated against, don't you?

    If you don't, you're in a minority. Same with teachers. Same with (I
    hope) the police. And judges.

    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.

    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an alternative view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The Rise of Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jun 16 12:42:28 2025
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 13:40:29 BST, JNugent wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 09:16 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 08:42, RJH wrote:

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance,
    disability (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and
    homophobia (for example) in UK society? And those characteristics
    can work against, say, a job applicant or a child at school despite
    laws and policies in place to prevent discrimination?

    So can being a fat arsed lazy slob with no personal hygiene

    Don't you think that a deaf dumb and blind idiot with no education
    should be allowed to operate on your brain, because herai8ng, speech,
    sight, and intelligence are all 'privilege'

    Christ on a bike, discrimination is how you *choose* a person for a job.

    And you take *everything * into account that is relevant to the job.

    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.

    Of *course* not everybody has the same opportunities. Are you mental?
    I am not built like a Kenyan long distance runner. I have standards of
    moral behaviour, so I could never be a Labour politician.

    Discrimination is what enables you tell food from poison, light from
    dark, Your mother from your girlfriend...

    If you want a world without discrimination try being an amoeba.

    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an
    alternative view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The
    Rise of Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.

    Oh gawd.
    Try this, instead.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsdsK-Am0WY

    The best post of yours I've ever seen.

    Low bar.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jun 16 12:45:03 2025
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 09:16:46 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 08:42, RJH wrote:

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance, disability
    (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and homophobia (for example) in >> UK society? And those characteristics can work against, say, a job applicant >> or a child at school despite laws and policies in place to prevent
    discrimination?

    So can being a fat arsed lazy slob with no personal hygiene

    Don't you think that a deaf dumb and blind idiot with no education
    should be allowed to operate on your brain, because herai8ng, speech,
    sight, and intelligence are all 'privilege'

    Christ on a bike, discrimination is how you *choose* a person for a job.

    And you take *everything * into account that is relevant to the job.


    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.


    Of *course* not everybody has the same opportunities. Are you mental?
    I am not built like a Kenyan long distance runner. I have standards of
    moral behaviour, so I could never be a Labour politician.


    Discrimination is what enables you tell food from poison, light from
    dark, Your mother from your girlfriend...

    If you want a world without discrimination try being an amoeba.


    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an alternative >> view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The Rise of >> Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.


    Oh gawd.
    Try this, instead.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsdsK-Am0WY

    And that, in a nutshell, is your explanation for inequality?
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jun 16 12:46:14 2025
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 08:54:41 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 11:38, RJH wrote:
    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some
    redress won't do any harm.

    Hey rob.

    Which you like to be :

    (a) as poor as your neighbour?

    (b) poorer than your neighbour, but richer than you otherwise would be?

    No idea. I'd like to think we all had enough.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 14:11:42 2025
    On 16/06/2025 01:46 PM, RJH wrote:

    On 16 Jun 2025 at 08:54:41 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 11:38, RJH wrote:

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some >>> redress won't do any harm.

    Hey rob.
    Which you like to be :
    (a) as poor as your neighbour?
    (b) poorer than your neighbour, but richer than you otherwise would be?

    No idea. I'd like to think we all had enough.

    The question wasn't about absolutes.

    It was about relativities.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 18:38:16 2025
    On 16/06/2025 13:46, RJH wrote:
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 08:54:41 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 11:38, RJH wrote:
    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some >>> redress won't do any harm.

    Hey rob.

    Which you like to be :

    (a) as poor as your neighbour?

    (b) poorer than your neighbour, but richer than you otherwise would be?

    No idea.
    Indeed.

    --
    "In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is
    true: it is true because it is powerful."

    Lucas Bergkamp

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 18:37:53 2025
    On 16/06/2025 13:45, RJH wrote:
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 09:16:46 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 08:42, RJH wrote:

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance, disability
    (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and homophobia (for example) in
    UK society? And those characteristics can work against, say, a job applicant
    or a child at school despite laws and policies in place to prevent
    discrimination?

    So can being a fat arsed lazy slob with no personal hygiene

    Don't you think that a deaf dumb and blind idiot with no education
    should be allowed to operate on your brain, because herai8ng, speech,
    sight, and intelligence are all 'privilege'

    Christ on a bike, discrimination is how you *choose* a person for a job.

    And you take *everything * into account that is relevant to the job.


    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.


    Of *course* not everybody has the same opportunities. Are you mental?
    I am not built like a Kenyan long distance runner. I have standards of
    moral behaviour, so I could never be a Labour politician.


    Discrimination is what enables you tell food from poison, light from
    dark, Your mother from your girlfriend...

    If you want a world without discrimination try being an amoeba.


    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an alternative
    view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The Rise of >>> Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.


    Oh gawd.
    Try this, instead.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsdsK-Am0WY

    And that, in a nutshell, is your explanation for inequality?

    Hello, is there an intelligent human being in there?

    I don't need any excuse for inequality. I'm not God.

    Inequality is part of the world.
    People who pretend it isn't are living in Lala land.

    --
    Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice.
    – Will Durant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 16 19:40:52 2025
    On 16/06/2025 01:43, alan_m wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 17:31, Andrew wrote:


    Nonsense. The triple lock meant that pensioners did far better
    over the last 25 years than low income workers did.

    The WFA was simply a bribe by Gordon Brown to buy pensioners votes.


    And Gordon Brown tax raid on pension pot dividends is the reason many
    pension are a lot worse than they would have been. Without this many pensioners would have been better off and the Government would now be benefitting from higher income tax revenues. :)



    As they (the Gov) will be in Novemeber if the mooted raid on
    dividends and other tax increases materialises

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jun 16 19:39:23 2025
    On 16/06/2025 01:06, JNugent wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 05:31 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 14/06/2025 18:35, JNugent wrote:
    On 14/06/2025 06:08 PM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    In article <102jr5t$6hk1$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says... >>>>>
    On 13/06/2025 13:30, charles wrote:
    In article <102grm1$3btpv$1@dont-email.me>,
         TimW <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 23:32, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx >>>>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents. >>>>>>>>
    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Some pensioners live in large houses with loads of spare bedrooms >>>>>>> while
    young people can't find a place to live - and now they want a
    discount
    on the Council Tax they pay on their big empty houses? They can
    take a
    running jump and move to a nice little flat if they don't like the >>>>>>> Council tax.
    TW

    The extra bedrooms are used by their children and grandchildren
    when they
    come to stay.

    Indeed, and they can do what they want with their money and their
    property but the OP was asking for a discount for pensioners as if it >>>>> was their misfortune to own big houses and deserved some sympathy.

    TW

    I have a big 'empty nest'. If I don't want it I sell it. I don't expect >>>> the government to subsidise me.
    Before winter fuel payments came along I managed. Then the 'nice'
    government of the day gave me some money every winter, without me
    asking
    for it. I didn't need it, but it seemed rude not to take it.
    Then the 'nasty' government stopped giving me it. Where's my money they >>>> all cried.
    My granny gave me pocket money until I was all grown up. I could have
    refused it, but she would have been offended. If one day she had not
    given me the money, I certainly would NOT have cried "Where's my money, >>>> gran!"
    Sort of parable init?

    No.

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension
    (worth another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was
    something that anyone would have included when stating what their
    annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income.

    Nonsense. The triple lock meant that pensioners did far better
    over the last 25 years than low income workers did.

    Are you REALLY trying to claim that a reduction in pensioner income was
    not a reduction in pensioner income? :-)

    It wasn't a *reduction*, it was a reset, back to their original
    position, and still far batter off than they were 25 years ago.

    The WFA was simply a bribe by Gordon Brown to buy pensioners votes.

    He might have had that as an aim (who knows?), but the factual reality
    was that over the period of the very late 1980s through to the date when
    the WFA was instituted, the assistance available with heating costs (via
    the Social Fund) was dependent upon weather station measurements in the region where you lived and very winter, some people got payments while
    others didn't, with consequent annual "hilarity" on the letters page of
    the Guardian, etc. The WFA was at least partly a measure designed to
    obviate that yearly trial for the government.

    But you probably didn't know that.

    I know that for years, British people retired to the Indian Ocean
    French overseas territory of Reunion, also got the 'Winter Fuel
    allowance', as did huge numbers living in other hot parts of the
    EU.

    And for 50 years, todays whinging pensioners jetted off to Spain
    for their hols oblivious to the possibility that one day they
    would be retired and those absurdly low energy prices of the
    60's through to about 15 years ago (when the UK became a net
    importer of oil and gas) would actually be replaced by energy
    costs related to world prices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jun 16 19:42:55 2025
    On 16/06/2025 01:00, JNugent wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 05:26 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 07:29, RJH wrote:
    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your
    personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/


    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently
    £9000 or
    £12000, depending on when you were born.

    Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?,

    Not.

    The deciding factor is the date on which the citizen reached pension age (whether or not retired).

    So "depending on when you were born" was perfectly correct.

    As was my reply since reaching SPA depends on whether you hit that
    age before or after April 2016

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Jun 16 19:53:22 2025
    On 16/06/2025 08:47, RJH wrote:
    On 15 Jun 2025 at 18:20:47 BST, Smolley wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:38:56 +0000, RJH wrote:

    On 15 Jun 2025 at 10:13:49 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 15/06/2025 in message <102lu2h$pkch$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    And who knows how many other cuts in pensioner income this shower
    were planning?

    Spite is their middle name.

    Yes but. Do you agree that the state pension and pensioner benefits
    could be open to means testing? Especially if it can be done in a
    simple way - say,
    those with a declared income >100k or savings >1m lose entitlement to >>>>> pension-related benefits?

    As long as contributions are adjusted. I paid other people's pensions
    for 36 years, why should I now see my own pension reduced?

    OK, that's fine (of course).

    I just happen to think that the UK is a highly unequal society, and some >>> redress won't do any harm.

    If you and others want to keep your (relatively) vast income and wealth
    to yourselves, fill your boots.

    I had been an agency worker from 1962 to 2003, had a bit of a heart do, so >> I had to retire. I didn't bother with a long term pension, but I try one
    in 1970, but it only lasted for a month. I subsequently forgot about it,
    until I was sent a cheque for £2500 in 2006.

    Similar - but not quite as good! My mum pressurised me into taking out a pension 40 years ago. I paid into it for about a year, about £500. Worth £8000
    now, were I to cash it in.


    Now use the ONS inflation graphs to see what that £8K is actually
    worth compared to what you claim you paid in.

    BTW, most private pension contracts started back then (*)front-loaded commission so that most of your first 2 years (and sometimes longer) contributions vanished as charges, and if you stopped paying in, then
    another clause would mean ongoing charges would soon munch through
    what was left.

    QED, I struggle to believe your claim that you paid in £500 for just one
    year and still ended up with that amount after 40 years.

    (*) Mrs T's pensions changes where people could be (mis)sold private
    pensions and contract out of SERPS started in 1988. I started two
    in that year under the 'new' rules.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jun 16 20:41:14 2025
    On 16/06/2025 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 11:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 08:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 17:15, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are
    life advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.

    It is.
    Remember the basic tenets of Marxism:

    Anyone who has more than you is privileged.
    You are poor because you are oppressed.
    So there is no point in working to better yourself. Only in working
    to take away their money

    I thought it was, "To those, according to their needs; from those,
    according to their abilities"?


    It might have started that way, but the weaponized version that today' Leftists use to wreck everything is as I said.

    Amusing, since _yours_ is clearly a "weaponised version" if there ever
    was such a thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 22:07:13 2025
    On 16/06/2025 07:42 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 01:00, JNugent wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 05:26 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 07:29, RJH wrote:
    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx wrote: >>>>>
    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on your >>>> personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/



    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently
    £9000 or £12000, depending on when you were born.

    Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?,

    Not.

    The deciding factor is the date on which the citizen reached pension
    age (whether or not retired).

    So "depending on when you were born" was perfectly correct.

    As was my reply since reaching SPA depends on whether you hit that
    age before or after April 2016

    Andrew said that whether you got the old or new pension depended on when
    you were born (and that was correct).

    You said (if I interpret the attributions correctly!):

    "Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?, [sic]".

    But it doesn't. Irrespective of the date of retirement (which may be
    years away), it's purely based on whether you were born before that all important date in April 2016. You can get your old or new pension while
    still working if you want it. Retirement is not a requirement.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jun 16 22:13:44 2025
    On 16/06/2025 07:39 PM, Andrew wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 01:06, JNugent wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 05:31 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 14/06/2025 18:35, JNugent wrote:

    [ ... ]

    The WFA became, and so was, a de facto part of the state pension
    (worth another £3.84 or £5.76 a week according to age). It was
    something that anyone would have included when stating what their
    annual income was.

    Abolishing it amounted to a reduction in pensioner income.

    Nonsense. The triple lock meant that pensioners did far better
    over the last 25 years than low income workers did.

    Are you REALLY trying to claim that a reduction in pensioner income
    was not a reduction in pensioner income? :-)

    It wasn't a *reduction*, it was a reset, back to their original
    position, and still far batter off than they were 25 years ago.

    So you really ARE trying to argue that a reduction in income was not a reduction in income (and are now trying to argue that it was an
    increase! :-)

    Have you been studying at the Diane Abbott School of Higher Mathematics?

    The WFA was simply a bribe by Gordon Brown to buy pensioners votes.

    He might have had that as an aim (who knows?), but the factual reality
    was that over the period of the very late 1980s through to the date
    when the WFA was instituted, the assistance available with heating
    costs (via the Social Fund) was dependent upon weather station
    measurements in the region where you lived and every winter, some
    people got payments while others didn't, with consequent annual
    "hilarity" on the letters page of the Guardian, etc. The WFA was at
    least partly a measure designed to obviate that yearly trial for the
    government.

    But you probably didn't know that.

    I know that for years, British people retired to the Indian Ocean
    French overseas territory of Reunion, also got the 'Winter Fuel
    allowance', as did huge numbers living in other hot parts of the
    EU.

    And?

    Do you begrudge pensioners their pensions?

    It seems you do.

    But hang on long enough and if you're lucky and don't go under a bus or anything, YOU'll be a pensioner some day. I wish you well in your journey.

    And you didn't know the origina and genesis of the WFA scheme.

    And for 50 years, todays whinging pensioners jetted off to Spain
    for their hols oblivious to the possibility that one day they
    would be retired and those absurdly low energy prices of the
    60's through to about 15 years ago (when the UK became a net
    importer of oil and gas) would actually be replaced by energy
    costs related to world prices.

    Was that their fault?

    If "No", what are you talking about?

    If "Yes", please explain your view that pensioners are responsible for
    high world fuel prices.

    If you can.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Jun 16 22:43:50 2025
    On 16/06/2025 20:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 11:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 08:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 17:15, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are
    life advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.

    It is.
    Remember the basic tenets of Marxism:

    Anyone who has more than you is privileged.
    You are poor because you are oppressed.
    So there is no point in working to better yourself. Only in working
    to take away their money

    I thought it was, "To those, according to their needs; from those,
    according to their abilities"?


    It might have started that way, but the weaponized version that today'
    Leftists use to wreck everything is as I said.

    Amusing, since _yours_ is clearly a "weaponised version" if there ever
    was such a thing.

    Well I got it from the hard left. Its not really mine

    --
    A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on
    its shoes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jun 16 22:15:22 2025
    On 16/06/2025 10:07 PM, JNugent wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 07:42 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 01:00, JNugent wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 05:26 PM, Andrew wrote:
    On 13/06/2025 07:29, RJH wrote:
    On 12 Jun 2025 at 23:32:00 BST, "Jeff Gaines" wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 in message <102fi8n$2tu7l$5@dont-email.me> Fredxx
    wrote:

    On 12/06/2025 17:53, Joe wrote:
    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707


    You can get a reduction if you're on low income - depends a bit on
    your
    personal circumstances and council:

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/benefits-entitlements/council-tax-reduction/




    Bit rich as pensions have the most wealth and least dependents.

    My council tax is twice my state pension.

    Good grief. A full state pension for a single person is currently
    £9000 or £12000, depending on when you were born.

    Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?,

    Not.

    The deciding factor is the date on which the citizen reached pension
    age (whether or not retired).

    So "depending on when you were born" was perfectly correct.

    As was my reply since reaching SPA depends on whether you hit that
    age before or after April 2016

    Andrew said that whether you got the old or new pension depended on when
    you were born (and that was correct).

    APOLOGY: That was RJH.

    You said (if I interpret the attributions correctly!):

    "Err, no. It primarily depends on whether you retired before or after
    April 2016?, [sic]".

    But it doesn't. Irrespective of the date of retirement (which may be
    years away), it's purely based on whether you were born before that all important date in April 2016. You can get your old or new pension while
    still working if you want it. Retirement is not a requirement.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Jun 17 04:07:02 2025
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 18:37:53 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 13:45, RJH wrote:
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 09:16:46 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/06/2025 08:42, RJH wrote:

    Do you believe that there's sexism, racism, religious intolerance, disability
    (mental and physical) discrimination, ageism and homophobia (for example) in
    UK society? And those characteristics can work against, say, a job applicant
    or a child at school despite laws and policies in place to prevent
    discrimination?

    So can being a fat arsed lazy slob with no personal hygiene

    Don't you think that a deaf dumb and blind idiot with no education
    should be allowed to operate on your brain, because herai8ng, speech,
    sight, and intelligence are all 'privilege'

    Christ on a bike, discrimination is how you *choose* a person for a job. >>>
    And you take *everything * into account that is relevant to the job.


    If you do, then not everyone has the same opportunities.


    Of *course* not everybody has the same opportunities. Are you mental?
    I am not built like a Kenyan long distance runner. I have standards of
    moral behaviour, so I could never be a Labour politician.


    Discrimination is what enables you tell food from poison, light from
    dark, Your mother from your girlfriend...

    If you want a world without discrimination try being an amoeba.


    If you don't, OK. Your mind is probably made up. If you fancy an alternative
    view, I'd recommend one of the most formative books I've read: The Rise of >>>> Meritocracy by Michael Young. Satirises it all very nicely.


    Oh gawd.
    Try this, instead.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsdsK-Am0WY

    And that, in a nutshell, is your explanation for inequality?

    Hello, is there an intelligent human being in there?

    I don't need any excuse for inequality. I'm not God.

    Not expecting you to excuse anything. *Explain*. But if you can't, no problem.

    Inequality is part of the world.
    People who pretend it isn't are living in Lala land.

    High rates of inequality (Gini etc.) are not inevitable and can be corrected - often are. The UK, as a 'developed' country, has some of the worst wealth inequality. Income inequality is merely spectacularly poor.

    It's not 'part of the world' or in any way inevitable.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "If economists were held in the same regard as medical
    practitioners, our courts would be overwhelmed with malpractice suits" -- unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Jun 17 04:15:57 2025
    On 16 Jun 2025 at 19:53:22 BST, Andrew wrote:

    Similar - but not quite as good! My mum pressurised me into taking out a
    pension 40 years ago. I paid into it for about a year, about £500. Worth £8000
    now, were I to cash it in.


    Now use the ONS inflation graphs to see what that £8K is actually
    worth compared to what you claim you paid in.


    About £3k.

    BTW, most private pension contracts started back then (*)front-loaded commission so that most of your first 2 years (and sometimes longer) contributions vanished as charges, and if you stopped paying in, then
    another clause would mean ongoing charges would soon munch through
    what was left.

    QED, I struggle to believe your claim that you paid in £500 for just one year and still ended up with that amount after 40 years.


    You could be right - it's just what I remember. It's an AVC/Prudential scheme, if that makes any difference.

    (*) Mrs T's pensions changes where people could be (mis)sold private
    pensions and contract out of SERPS started in 1988. I started two
    in that year under the 'new' rules.

    My dad jumped on that bandwagon, a huge Thatcher fan. Lost almost all of an
    NHS dentist's pension by the time he retired about 20 years' ago.

    --
    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny . . .'" Isaac Asimov

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to RJH on Tue Jun 17 07:28:06 2025
    On 17/06/2025 in message <102qpl6$25mdp$1@dont-email.me> RJH wrote:

    Inequality is part of the world.
    People who pretend it isn't are living in Lala land.

    High rates of inequality (Gini etc.) are not inevitable and can be
    corrected -
    often are. The UK, as a 'developed' country, has some of the worst wealth >inequality. Income inequality is merely spectacularly poor.

    It's not 'part of the world' or in any way inevitable.

    It's hard to work through all the commie dogma but we are born equal* and
    have equal opportunities, but some people just won't pull their weight.

    *accepting we have a responsibility to those few unfortunates who aren't.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    There are 10 types of people in the world, those who do binary and those
    who don't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 17 09:32:52 2025
    On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:28:35 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Scott wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Scott wrote:

    Joe wrote:

    Worth a try.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/706707

    No, there are no pensioners on Newsgroups.
    And none of them get single-occupier discount either.

    I think they do - 25% discount for sole occupation.

    If unicode included the SarcMark™ I'd have used it ...

    Sorry, I was slow on the uptake that day :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Jun 17 22:36:22 2025
    On 16/06/2025 22:43, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 20:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 11:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 08:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 17:15, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are
    life advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.

    It is.
    Remember the basic tenets of Marxism:

    Anyone who has more than you is privileged.
    You are poor because you are oppressed.
    So there is no point in working to better yourself. Only in working
    to take away their money

    I thought it was, "To those, according to their needs; from those,
    according to their abilities"?


    It might have started that way, but the weaponized version that
    today' Leftists use to wreck everything is as I said.

    Amusing, since _yours_ is clearly a "weaponised version" if there ever
    was such a thing.

    Well I got it from the hard left. Its not really mine

    Well that isn't really true is it?
    You took the original concept and twisted it into a form which suited
    your views and approach to life.
    Your views are your own, I think most people here accept that, but when
    to pretend to speak on behalf of those you oppose...
    It isn't cricket.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Wed Jun 18 11:19:22 2025
    On 17/06/2025 22:36, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 22:43, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 20:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 11:16, Max Demian wrote:
    On 16/06/2025 08:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/06/2025 17:15, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    Parents working their socks off and studying in my home time are >>>>>>> life advantages? That sounds like commie propaganda.

    It is.
    Remember the basic tenets of Marxism:

    Anyone who has more than you is privileged.
    You are poor because you are oppressed.
    So there is no point in working to better yourself. Only in
    working to take away their money

    I thought it was, "To those, according to their needs; from those,
    according to their abilities"?


    It might have started that way, but the weaponized version that
    today' Leftists use to wreck everything is as I said.

    Amusing, since _yours_ is clearly a "weaponised version" if there
    ever was such a thing.

    Well I got it from the hard left. Its not really mine

    Well that isn't really true is it?
    You took the original concept and twisted it into a form which suited
    your views and approach to life.
    Your views are your own, I think most people here accept that, but when
    to pretend to speak on behalf of those you oppose...
    It isn't cricket.
    I have merely noted how 'Just stop oil' 'Black Lives matter' 'Gender
    ideology' etc etc actually work.

    1. Find a minority
    2. Tell everyone that they are 'oppressed' and 'social injustice' and 'prejudice' is ruining their lives
    3. Mount huge campaigns that end up making everyone dislike the
    advocates for simply getting in their faces.
    4. Use this to claim the the prejudice they invented,m now actually exists
    5. Split society into warring fragments over an entirely imaginary issue.
    6. Announce that only a strong left wing (or sometimes right wing) anti democratic government can 'solve the problem' and create a 'fair society'

    Its AgitProp 101. It was invented in Moscow, and exported to Cuba and
    then to the whole of the Western world.

    It has wrought destruction and led to totalitarianism wherever it got significant hold



    --
    There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
    returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

    Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)