• Curiouser and curiouser. That tale of the undelivered parcel

    From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 13:54:58 2025
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't send
    me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes they eventually said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.

    --
    "A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight
    and understanding".

    Marshall McLuhan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indy Jess John@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 14:33:54 2025
    On 31/07/2025 13:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't send
    me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes  they eventually  said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.

    You could make life a bit difficult for the vendor.

    If you take the bit after the @ in their address and put it into the
    Whois website https://www.whatsmyip.org/whois-dns-lookup
    you should find an address to report abuse. Report it as failure to
    dispatch goods advertised so a probable scam. (Not quite true, but true
    enough because you didn't receive anything). The scam accusation might
    be serious enough for someone to take notice.

    Sometimes the Whois output is a bit more detailed and you might find a
    postal address. Don't raise your hopes on that though.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Indy Jess John on Thu Jul 31 14:49:22 2025
    On 31/07/2025 14:33, Indy Jess John wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 13:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't
    send me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes  they eventually  said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.

    You could make life a bit difficult for the vendor.

    If you take the bit after the @ in their address and put it into the
    Whois website https://www.whatsmyip.org/whois-dns-lookup
    you should find an address to report abuse. Report it as failure to
    dispatch goods advertised so a probable scam. (Not quite true, but true enough because you didn't receive anything).  The scam accusation might
    be serious enough for someone to take notice.


    Oh, its a scam website all right

    $ whois oryzom.co.uk

    Domain name:
    oryzom.co.uk

    Data validation:
    Nominet was not able to match the registrant's name and/or
    address against a 3rd party source on 19-May-2025

    Registrar:
    Namecheap, Inc. [Tag = NAMECHEAP-INC]
    URL: https://www.namecheap.com

    Relevant dates:
    Registered on: 19-May-2025
    Expiry date: 19-May-2026
    Last updated: 19-May-2025

    Registration status:
    Registered until expiry date.

    Name servers:
    dns1.registrar-servers.com
    dns2.registrar-servers.com

    WHOIS lookup made at 14:46:08 31-Jul-2025



    Sometimes the Whois output is a bit more detailed and you might find a
    postal address.  Don't raise your hopes on that though.

    Nope. Nada.
    It is just a website and a bank account as far as I can tell.





    --
    Of what good are dead warriors? … Warriors are those who desire battle
    more than peace. Those who seek battle despite peace. Those who thump
    their spears on the ground and talk of honor. Those who leap high the
    battle dance and dream of glory … The good of dead warriors, Mother, is
    that they are dead.
    Sheri S Tepper: The Awakeners.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu Jul 31 15:06:26 2025
    On 31/07/2025 14:47, Theo wrote:
    Otherwise, follow the money. Charging back the sender means they're out of pocket, and if they refuse to respond to customer contacts then possibly they won't defend chargebacks. The scamming sender might not want to admit they've been out-scammed.

    It was on a debit card.

    I do not know whether they will make a chargeback or not

    The recipient bank account may not exist any more

    I did finally get a validation code from actionfraud...

    *From - Thu Jul 31 14:02:23 2025*
    X-Account-Key: account4
    X-UIDL: 000249f64f407633
    X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
    X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
    X-Mozilla-Keys:

    Return-path: <noreply@actionfraud.police.uk>
    Envelope-to: xxx@redacted.com
    *Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:52:44 +0100*
    Received: from mail01.actionfraud.police.uk ([81.128.180.209] helo=cjsm.actionfraud.police.uk)
    by vps.templar.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <noreply@actionfraud.police.uk>)
    id 1uhSm4-00029V-AY
    for xxx@redacted.com ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:52:44 +0100
    *Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:07:40 +0000*

    So the email took the best part of an hour to get here

    I've filled in their shit.

    But its hard to give any details for a company that simply doesn't exist
    beyond a website and an unresponsive email address and presumably a bank account.

    They don't even have to have a known address - they could drop a parcel
    at an evri pickup point.



    --
    "Corbyn talks about equality, justice, opportunity, health care, peace, community, compassion, investment, security, housing...."
    "What kind of person is not interested in those things?"

    "Jeremy Corbyn?"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 15:48:56 2025
    On 31/07/2025 15:06, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    But its hard to give any details for a company that simply doesn't exist beyond a website and an unresponsive email address and presumably a bank account.

    "If you suspect a Shopify store is committing fraud and it has been over 30 days since you placed your order, you can report the store to Shopify using
    the Report an issue with an order form."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu Jul 31 16:20:21 2025
    On 31/07/2025 15:26, Theo wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 14:47, Theo wrote:
    Otherwise, follow the money. Charging back the sender means they're out of >>> pocket, and if they refuse to respond to customer contacts then possibly they
    won't defend chargebacks. The scamming sender might not want to admit
    they've been out-scammed.

    It was on a debit card.

    I do not know whether they will make a chargeback or not

    The recipient bank account may not exist any more

    That's the bank's problem, not yours. If you contact your bank to make a chargeback with your evidence, your bank will likely 'make enquiries' but
    may contingently refund you in the meantime. It's probable the trail will
    go to a Hong Kong bank and if it goes cold then your bank has refunded you upfront anyway.

    I did finally get a validation code from actionfraud...
    ...
    *Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:07:40 +0000*

    So the email took the best part of an hour to get here

    I've filled in their shit.

    I wouldn't expect much from that direction. Maybe it'll put the seller on their enormous list of similar companies.

    But its hard to give any details for a company that simply doesn't exist
    beyond a website and an unresponsive email address and presumably a bank
    account.

    They don't even have to have a known address - they could drop a parcel
    at an evri pickup point.

    It may well be they use similar logistics to Aliexpress - contract a third party freight forwarding company like Cainiao, 4PX etc. Those put it on a plane, collect it at Heathrow, clear it through customs and then drop it into the Evri system. The seller doesn't actually have any UK people at all.

    If you have a tracking number, the one starting with H is Evri (formerly Hermes). But if there's another number (all digits?) you could put it into https://parcelsapp.com/

    and see if it pulls up any Chinese tracking details.

    Theo

    It was too quick for a chinese delivery.

    --
    “People believe certain stories because everyone important tells them,
    and people tell those stories because everyone important believes them.
    Indeed, when a conventional wisdom is at its fullest strength, one’s agreement with that conventional wisdom becomes almost a litmus test of
    one’s suitability to be taken seriously.”

    Paul Krugman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Jul 31 16:26:35 2025
    On 31/07/2025 15:48, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 15:06, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    But its hard to give any details for a company that simply doesn't
    exist beyond a website and an unresponsive email address and
    presumably a bank account.

    "If you suspect a Shopify store is committing fraud and it has been over
    30 days since you placed your order, you can report the store to Shopify using the Report an issue with an order form."

    I'm on the way there.

    I am going to kick up the biggest shit storm I can and see what pops out
    of the turd heap

    Everyone is simply stating 'well its your fault if you get stung' and no attempt to actually catch any criminals.

    Or shut down any illegal operations

    Thank heavens I never saw the Evri driver, If he had happened to be
    Muslim I would be in jail for racism and islamophobia.

    And they wonder why Reform is riding high in the polls!

    --
    “People believe certain stories because everyone important tells them,
    and people tell those stories because everyone important believes them.
    Indeed, when a conventional wisdom is at its fullest strength, one’s agreement with that conventional wisdom becomes almost a litmus test of
    one’s suitability to be taken seriously.”

    Paul Krugman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 15:38:41 2025
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 14:47, Theo wrote:
    Otherwise, follow the money. Charging back the sender means they're out of >> pocket, and if they refuse to respond to customer contacts then possibly they
    won't defend chargebacks. The scamming sender might not want to admit
    they've been out-scammed.

    It was on a debit card.

    I do not know whether they will make a chargeback or not

    The recipient bank account may not exist any more

    Not your problem. This website says you can get a chargeback on a debit
    card:

    <https://www.moneysupermarket.com/credit-cards/what-is-chargeback/

    Good luck!


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 15:53:41 2025
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:26:35 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    I am going to kick up the biggest shit storm I can and see what pops out
    of the turd heap

    Probably better to be calm and ensure you have all the facts.

    Record all calls (which will automatically date & time your calls. When I
    had to deal with a difficult supplier at my last place, the series of
    logs from the phone system (which I managed) showing 11 hours and 37
    minutes call time over 2 weeks proved very effective in reaching a
    suitable resolution .....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Spike on Thu Jul 31 16:58:36 2025
    On 31/07/2025 16:38, Spike wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 14:47, Theo wrote:
    Otherwise, follow the money. Charging back the sender means they're out of >>> pocket, and if they refuse to respond to customer contacts then possibly they
    won't defend chargebacks. The scamming sender might not want to admit
    they've been out-scammed.

    It was on a debit card.

    I do not know whether they will make a chargeback or not

    The recipient bank account may not exist any more

    Not your problem. This website says you can get a chargeback on a debit
    card:

    <https://www.moneysupermarket.com/credit-cards/what-is-chargeback/

    Good luck!


    Yeah. I contacted my bank and got the same story.
    They said I should wait a bit in order to justifiably claim 'they are
    not talking to me'.

    Well I have had a pleasant day kicking up a shitstorm and documenting everything.

    I think the appalling thing is - as when I had my oil tank contents
    stolen - no one gives a flying fuck.

    But I can get 'victim counselling'

    I am wondering if suing the hosting company might be fun.

    Anyone know if they are legally responsible for activity and what's
    hosted? I am sure if it was kiddyporn the police would be interested.


    --
    “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

    ― Voltaire, Questions sur les Miracles à M. Claparede, Professeur de Théologie à Genève, par un Proposant: Ou Extrait de Diverses Lettres de
    M. de Voltaire

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 17:10:49 2025
    On 31/07/2025 16:53, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:26:35 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    I am going to kick up the biggest shit storm I can and see what pops out
    of the turd heap

    Probably better to be calm and ensure you have all the facts.

    Record all calls (which will automatically date & time your calls. When I
    had to deal with a difficult supplier at my last place, the series of
    logs from the phone system (which I managed) showing 11 hours and 37
    minutes call time over 2 weeks proved very effective in reaching a
    suitable resolution .....

    What calls? The website has no phone number. It has no street address.
    It has no registered company.

    I have recorded all the emails Saying: ----------------------------------------------
    Thank you for reaching out.

    We're currently experiencing a high volume of support requests and may
    take a bit longer to respond than usual. Rest assured, your message has
    been received and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

    We appreciate your patience and will respond at the earliest opportunity.

    Best regards,
    Oryzom Support Team

    This email is a service from Oryzom. Delivered by Zendesk

    [PZ7ZGP-657P1]
    ---------------------------------------------
    I mean how much more do you have to do to prove it's a scam?

    they don't exist except as a website.

    All my interactions with the vendors hosting company, and it's domain
    registrar and the parcel delivery company are email


    --
    "Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They
    always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them"

    Margaret Thatcher

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu Jul 31 17:11:27 2025
    On 31/07/2025 15:04, Theo wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 14:33, Indy Jess John wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 13:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't
    send me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes  they eventually  said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.

    You could make life a bit difficult for the vendor.

    If you take the bit after the @ in their address and put it into the
    Whois website https://www.whatsmyip.org/whois-dns-lookup
    you should find an address to report abuse. Report it as failure to
    dispatch goods advertised so a probable scam. (Not quite true, but true
    enough because you didn't receive anything).  The scam accusation might >>> be serious enough for someone to take notice.


    Oh, its a scam website all right

    $ whois oryzom.co.uk

    Seems like you need to book a flight to Hong Kong's old airport:

    "Should you have any questions about our privacy practices or this Privacy Policy, or if you would like to exercise any of the rights available to you, please call or email us at support@oryzim.co.uk or contact us at Rm D07,8/F
    , Kai Tak Fty Building, San Po Kong, HK, HK." https://www.oryzom.co.uk/policies/privacy-policy

    Appropriately located on 'King Fuk Street': https://maps.app.goo.gl/CYLiiv9Nny8EvzDE6


    When buying from a random website you've never heard of, always worth scrutinising the legal sections of their website, where you find such gems:

    "SECTION 20 - CONTACT INFORMATION
    Questions about the Terms of Service should be sent to us at al_cooperation@protonmail.com.
    Our contact information is posted below:
    [INSERT TRADING NAME]
    support@oryzom.co.uk
    [INSERT BUSINESS ADDRESS]
    [INSERT BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER]
    [INSERT BUSINESS REGISTRATION NUMBER]
    [INSERT VAT NUMBER]"
    https://www.oryzom.co.uk/policies/terms-of-service


    I think that's plenty of ammunition for a chargeback/Section 75 claim.

    Theo

    Hey Theo, thanks for being interested!

    Now I made a little progress,
    DIGGing ...
    www.oryzom.co.uk is CNAMEd to shop.spotify.com

    And their domain is managed by markmonitior.com, who have an email
    address, so I have contacted them to report one of their domains
    (spotify.com) is being used to commit a crime,.

    I also managed to talk to someone or an AI bot at shopify, who host the website, and am well on the say to contacting their legal department to
    remind them that failure to release contact information for the website
    is technically conspiracy to defraud...

    They also have a website reporting procedure
    They seem legit.



    --
    “But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an hypothesis!”

    Mary Wollstonecraft

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 14:06:06 2025
    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.

    I don't think actionfraud are interested in individual crimes, just
    spotting patterns?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 17:13:48 2025
    Oh. Hosting company is in Canada.
    Outside UK law ....

    --
    The New Left are the people they warned you about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 19:42:04 2025
    On 31/07/2025 13:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't send
    me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes  they eventually  said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.




    Trustpilot reviews for this site (all 8 of them) are 1 star, and they
    report the same issues as you. I assume that if you had checked you
    wouldn't have gone ahead with the transaction.


    I obviously don't bother checking reviews for the likes of Amazon and
    JL, but anywhere else I check.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 19:50:24 2025
    On 31/07/2025 19:42, GB wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 13:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't
    send me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes  they eventually  said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.




    Trustpilot reviews for this site (all 8 of them) are 1 star, and they
    report the same issues as you. I assume that if you had checked you
    wouldn't have gone ahead with the transaction.


    I obviously don't bother checking reviews for the likes of Amazon and
    JL, but anywhere else I check.


    I was referred to that site from another site that seemed very legit.

    I only checked trustpilot too late to make a difference, :-(



    --
    Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
    to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 20:40:43 2025
    On 31/07/2025 17:11, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    Now I made a little progress,
    DIGGing ...
    www.oryzom.co.uk is CNAMEd to shop.spotify.com

    And their domain is managed by markmonitior.com, who have an email address, so I have contacted them to report one of their domains (spotify.com) is being used to commit a crime,.

    I also managed to talk to someone or an AI bot at shopify, who host the website, and am well on the say to contacting their legal department to remind them that failure to release contact information for the website is technically conspiracy to defraud...

    They also have a website reporting procedure
    They seem legit.

    shopify are definitely legit, but not UK based and expect you to wait 30 days; markmonitor.com will ignore you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jul 31 20:47:25 2025
    On 31/07/2025 19:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 19:42, GB wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 13:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't
    send me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes  they eventually  said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.




    Trustpilot reviews for this site (all 8 of them) are 1 star, and they
    report the same issues as you. I assume that if you had checked you
    wouldn't have gone ahead with the transaction.


    I obviously don't bother checking reviews for the likes of Amazon and
    JL, but anywhere else I check.


    I was referred to that site from another site that seemed very legit.

    I only checked trustpilot too late to make a difference, :-(

    I don't use it it myself, but there's a browser extension:

    https://help.trustpilot.com/s/article/Trustpilots-Google-Chrome-Extension?language=en_US


    Also, this:

    https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/sitejabber-ratings-review/ckiddbafgcfifpioacgfijgicacanflo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Aug 1 07:53:46 2025
    On 31/07/2025 20:28, Theo wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    And their domain is managed by markmonitior.com, who have an email
    address, so I have contacted them to report one of their domains
    (spotify.com) is being used to commit a crime,.

    I also managed to talk to someone or an AI bot at shopify, who host the
    website, and am well on the say to contacting their legal department to
    remind them that failure to release contact information for the website
    is technically conspiracy to defraud...

    They also have a website reporting procedure
    They seem legit.

    Shopify are one of those giant platforms which a lot of small/medium sized shops whitelabel when they want to sell things on their own website rather than sell via Amazon/ebay/etsy/... but don't want to handle hosting a website, payments, etc. They're legit, although I have no experience of their complaints procedure.

    I suppose the best you could do is get them to take down the Oryzom website, which would be something. But another one would likely pop up in their place.

    Pressuring Shopify to publish a contact address for every store would be another useful thing, although likely the scammers will either use a mail forwarding service or an address in a faraway country. At least if you
    were shown that before purchase it might be a red flag. I doubt they would do that without regulatory pressure though.

    Theo
    I am partway through that process.

    --
    New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in
    the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in
    someone else's pocket.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Aug 1 16:18:04 2025
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    OPacrel alledglt deliverd by Evri,.
    Parcel not there.
    Vendor not responding to email. Ha s no other contact detials. Dioes
    niot exist as a registered company
    Evris say its not their problem its the vendors
    Tried to report to actionfraud website, Their login process didn't send
    me a validation code.
    Phoned them up, waited 40 minutes they eventually said 'its the
    vendors problem' and cut me off.

    Anyone got any spare tinfoil hats?

    No one seems to care that laws have been broken.


    If you paid by Credit Card, contact them.

    About a year back (+/-) I ordered something which didn’t arrive. I became ‘dubious’ when I couldn’t contact the seller. After some more checks, it appeared it was a scam and I was one of many.

    Credit Card company refunded money without any fuss ( about £200).

    Action Fraud contacted me after some time, a box ticking exercise. They are
    a waste of time.
    I made the point the way to stop this kind of fraud was for the Credit Card companies / banks to run checks on those who set up trader accounts. This seemed beyond the understanding of Action Fraud.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Brian on Fri Aug 1 20:18:00 2025
    Brian <noinv@lid.org> wrote:
    Action Fraud contacted me after some time, a box ticking exercise. They are
    a waste of time.

    It's an intelligence gathering exercise only. As they say:

    "When you report to us you will receive a police crime reference number. Reports taken are passed to the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau. Action Fraud does not investigate the cases and cannot advise you on the progress
    of a case."

    The intelligence may or may not result in action - we don't get further updates.

    I made the point the way to stop this kind of fraud was for the Credit Card companies / banks to run checks on those who set up trader accounts. This seemed beyond the understanding of Action Fraud.

    That's not in the remit of Action Fraud.

    Most of the scams come from abroad, and good luck enforcing that kind of
    policy with Bank of China or the like. If it's a real UK seller than
    Trading Standards may get involved. If you have a UK address it may be
    worth contacting Trading Standards local to where they are based.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indy Jess John@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Aug 1 21:31:29 2025
    On 31/07/2025 14:47, Theo wrote:
    It*is* Evri's problem, but Evri's contract is with the vendors and they don't care. It's up to the senders to make a complaint to Evri. You as recipient aren't able to make a claim against Evri directly.

    Evri are a slippery company for vendors too.

    I once sent my scanner/printer to a relative who had a lot of copying to
    do. The arrangement was that she would do her copying, put the printer
    in the packaging it came in and send it back.

    I watched their tracking and it got to my recipient's local distribution
    hub, then there was an entry that delivery might be delayed After a few
    days, as vendor I contacted Evri and complained that the delay had been
    going on too long and could they please get it delivered ASAP. That
    gained me a reply that they couldn't deliver it because it had been
    damaged in transit. I then told them to deliver it anyway because then
    I would know how much it had been damaged, and perhaps get it repaired.
    They then said they couldn't do that because they couldn't find it.

    So I asked for the cost of the contents of the parcel plus the cost of
    handing it to them as a delivery requirement, and they told me their
    refund policy was £20 for a loss. I looked up the cost of the cheapest similar all-in-one (the one I sent was no longer made), filled out a
    Small Claims form with what their incompetence had cost me to replace
    what they had lost (after all, I had expected to get my printer back, so
    it wasn't just the addressee's loss). I told them to pay within 14 days
    or I would send the document I had scanned for them to the court and
    pursue payment legally, and then they would have to pay the court fees
    as well. I got my cheque in the post in 10 days. Getting blood out of
    a stone would be easy in comparison.

    Corollary: I did buy the printer I had charged them for, and I did send
    it Parcelforce that time. It arrived OK and was used, and I received it
    back from the same carrier. I don't think I would ever send anything
    via Evri again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Indy Jess John on Sat Aug 2 11:30:24 2025
    On 01/08/2025 21:31, Indy Jess John wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 14:47, Theo wrote:
    It*is*  Evri's problem, but Evri's contract is with the vendors and they
    don't care.  It's up to the senders to make a complaint to Evri.  You as >> recipient aren't able to make a claim against Evri directly.

    Evri are a slippery company for vendors too.

    I once sent my scanner/printer to a relative who had a lot of copying to do.  The arrangement was that she would do her copying, put the printer
    in the packaging it came in and send it back.

    I watched their tracking and it got to my recipient's local distribution
    hub, then there was an entry that delivery might be delayed  After a few days, as vendor I contacted Evri and complained that the delay had been
    going on too long and could they please get it delivered ASAP.  That
    gained me a reply that they couldn't deliver it because it had been
    damaged in transit.  I then told them to deliver it anyway because then
    I would know how much it had been damaged, and perhaps get it repaired.
    They then said they couldn't do that because they couldn't find it.

    So I asked for the cost of the contents of the parcel plus the cost of handing it to them as a delivery requirement, and they told me their
    refund policy was £20 for a loss.  I looked up the cost of the cheapest similar all-in-one (the one I sent was no longer made), filled out a
    Small Claims form with what their incompetence had cost me to replace
    what they had lost (after all, I had expected to get my printer back, so
    it wasn't just the addressee's loss).  I told them to pay within 14 days
    or I would send the document I had scanned for them to the court and
    pursue payment legally, and then they would have to pay the court fees
    as well.  I got my cheque in the post in 10 days.  Getting blood out of
    a stone would be easy in comparison.

    Corollary:  I did buy the printer I had charged them for, and I did send
    it Parcelforce that time.  It arrived OK and was used, and I received it back from the same carrier.  I don't think I would ever send anything
    via Evri again.

    My experience shipping fragile packets (balsa wood kits) is that about
    one in thirty gets superficial damage and one in a hundred is smashed
    beyond repair with e.g. fork lift truck wheel marks on it...

    Mostly the vendor sorts it out and claims on the courier.

    Courier charges are very low really. Pay peanuts get monkeys

    Top level packaging is very helpful.


    --
    To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sat Aug 2 12:15:35 2025
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    My experience shipping fragile packets (balsa wood kits) is that about
    one in thirty gets superficial damage and one in a hundred is smashed
    beyond repair with e.g. fork lift truck wheel marks on it...

    Mostly the vendor sorts it out and claims on the courier.

    Courier charges are very low really. Pay peanuts get monkeys

    Top level packaging is very helpful.

    I think that's the courier business model. They know 1-3% of packages will come to grief, and they know that if you're a business seller you'll just include that as a cost of doing business - it's cheaper than paying the
    courier more on every shipment to take better care.

    Unfortunately it breaks down when you are sending a single irreplaceable
    item and you can't just pull another one out of inventory and ship a replacement. For that either you play the above lottery or if you're
    prepared to pay extra for more certainty there are higher cost services like Special Delivery.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Sat Aug 2 12:29:30 2025
    On 02/08/2025 12:15, Theo wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    My experience shipping fragile packets (balsa wood kits) is that about
    one in thirty gets superficial damage and one in a hundred is smashed
    beyond repair with e.g. fork lift truck wheel marks on it...

    Mostly the vendor sorts it out and claims on the courier.

    Courier charges are very low really. Pay peanuts get monkeys

    Top level packaging is very helpful.

    I think that's the courier business model. They know 1-3% of packages will come to grief, and they know that if you're a business seller you'll just include that as a cost of doing business - it's cheaper than paying the courier more on every shipment to take better care.

    Unfortunately it breaks down when you are sending a single irreplaceable
    item and you can't just pull another one out of inventory and ship a replacement. For that either you play the above lottery or if you're prepared to pay extra for more certainty there are higher cost services like Special Delivery.

    Theo
    I think that is true.

    Many vendors - if not most - simply refund or replace because its
    cheaper than getting the goods back, repairing them and then on-selling
    them as 'refurbs'.
    One vendor delivered lager glasses when I ordered high ball glasses.
    They sent the highballs and said 'keep the lagers' - I gave them to a
    mate. Another tome I ordered 'hairpin' retainers and got split pins.
    Again the vendors sent the correct item and said 'keep the others'

    ...........

    Unfortunately in my case the 'vendor' is no longer responding to emails.
    Evri have said 'its not their problem'
    Police don't give a fuck.
    Shopify may or may not cancel the site.
    Come Monday I'll start a chargeback claim with Visa




    --
    There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do
    that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon
    emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent renewable energy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sat Aug 2 13:03:51 2025
    On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 12:29:30 +0100
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:



    Many vendors - if not most - simply refund or replace because its
    cheaper than getting the goods back, repairing them and then
    on-selling them as 'refurbs'.
    One vendor delivered lager glasses when I ordered high ball glasses.
    They sent the highballs and said 'keep the lagers' - I gave them to a
    mate. Another tome I ordered 'hairpin' retainers and got split pins.
    Again the vendors sent the correct item and said 'keep the others'



    In my days of buying regularly from Farnell, they had a threshold of
    £8 for wrongly sent parts, above which they would arrange return.


    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)