• Re: House construction curiosity...

    From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 17:11:54 2025
    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
    floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    It's traditional: solid floor at the back with flags for the kitchen with
    a big range, and scullery / bog; floorboards at the front where your might
    want a rug.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Jul 31 18:41:21 2025
    On 31/07/2025 17:11, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
      on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
      floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
      floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see.  Why
      would it have been built like this?

     It's traditional: solid floor at the back with flags for the kitchen
    with a big range, and scullery / bog; floorboards at the front where
    your might want a rug.



    Our first house was a 1930s house. On one of the many estates around
    London built by Laing. Same thing. Solid kitchen floor. Suspended
    elsewhere.

    A really well built house, but the layout was not brilliant. Tiny
    kitchen. Tiny bathroom. Large dining room, which was separate from the
    kitchen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tim+@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 16:52:55 2025
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
    floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    Tim
    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 20:50:09 2025
    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
    floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    Dunno, but my parents (1949) 3 bed semi council house had the same
    arrangement.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Hogg@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Thu Jul 31 22:00:03 2025
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:50:09 +0100, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
    floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    Dunno, but my parents (1949) 3 bed semi council house had the same >arrangement.


    My small two-bed bungalow, built in 1959 has suspended floors in the
    kitchen and sitting room, but solid floors in the hall and two
    bedrooms. So it's not just prewar properties that have a bit of both.
    I don't see the point of some of each.

    --

    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Chris Hogg on Fri Aug 1 08:00:42 2025
    On 31/07/2025 22:00, Chris Hogg wrote:
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:50:09 +0100, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
    floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    Dunno, but my parents (1949) 3 bed semi council house had the same
    arrangement.


    My small two-bed bungalow, built in 1959 has suspended floors in the
    kitchen and sitting room, but solid floors in the hall and two
    bedrooms. So it's not just prewar properties that have a bit of both.
    I don't see the point of some of each.

    It's quite expensive to pour a full slab and if the size is large, it's
    also quite cold. And quite ugly.

    Back in the day we didn't have fitted carpets so it would likely be
    linoleum - no vinyl then - or tiles, with rugs on top.

    Stained floorboards were an acceptable finish .

    Our 1953 house was all slab.

    The neighbours could afford parquet...

    I think it was he 1960s when fitted carpets first appeared. Our stair
    carpet was part width only and held in place with rods...


    --
    New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in
    the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in
    someone else's pocket.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Armstrong@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 1 07:59:25 2025
    On 31/07/2025 18:41, GB wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 17:11, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
      on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
      floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
      floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see.  Why
      would it have been built like this?

      It's traditional: solid floor at the back with flags for the kitchen
    with a big range, and scullery / bog; floorboards at the front where
    your might want a rug.



    Our first house was a 1930s house. On one of the many estates around
    London built by Laing. Same thing. Solid kitchen floor. Suspended
    elsewhere.

    A really well built house, but the layout was not brilliant. Tiny
    kitchen. Tiny bathroom. Large dining room, which was separate from the kitchen.

    in 1951 my family moved into a newly built house. I don't know about
    floor construction, but it had a hatch in the wall between kitchen and
    dining room.

    As did another house we later moved to, built in the 30s. This house
    also had a real curiosity - a lavatory in a very small kitchen cupboard.
    has anyone else come across this?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to John Armstrong on Fri Aug 1 08:36:45 2025
    On 01/08/2025 07:59, John Armstrong wrote:

    in 1951 my family moved into a newly built house. I don't know about
    floor construction, but it had a hatch in the wall between kitchen and
    dining room.

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense.
    Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Fri Aug 1 09:06:01 2025
    On 01/08/2025 08:36, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 07:59, John Armstrong wrote:

    in 1951 my family moved into a newly built house. I don't know about
    floor construction, but it had a hatch in the wall between kitchen and
    dining room.

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    WE had a door. My mother asked me to fill it in and make a hatch. That
    was in the 60s

    --
    Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the
    gospel of envy.

    Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Fri Aug 1 09:00:02 2025
    In article <106hqqd$843c$1@dont-email.me>,
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 07:59, John Armstrong wrote:

    in 1951 my family moved into a newly built house. I don't know about
    floor construction, but it had a hatch in the wall between kitchen and dining room.

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    my parent's 1900ish house i Edinburgh had a substantial sized hatch. Good enough for children to hide in

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Fri Aug 1 10:14:48 2025
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were inconvenient so it got bricked-up. Eventually the door between kitchen
    and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of cabinets.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tricky Dicky@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Fri Aug 1 09:43:40 2025
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 07:59, John Armstrong wrote:

    in 1951 my family moved into a newly built house. I don't know about
    floor construction, but it had a hatch in the wall between kitchen and
    dining room.

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.


    The last house my parents owned was a 1962 three bedroom semi with a
    through lounge it too had a Serving hatch to the dining end of the lounge.
    This was quite convenient as otherwise it meant walking the full length of
    the corridor to access the lounge and then walking through the living room
    part to the dining area.

    Our last house was a 1957 three bedroom semi originally, it had a solid
    floor in what was originally the kitchen and suspended elsewhere. I do not
    know if it had a serving hatch as the wall between the original kitchen and dining room had already been removed before we moved in.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to charles on Fri Aug 1 12:03:38 2025
    On 31/07/2025 22:15, charles wrote:
    In article <SNPiQ.1919$8Sla.1760@fx12.ams1>,
    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
    floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    Dunno, but my parents (1949) 3 bed semi council house had the same
    arrangement.

    I suspect the reasoning behind this due to water use. The kitchen is likely to have water spilled on the floor, both from cooking and clothes washing, This would not be good for wooden floors.

    Yes, the 1960s bungalow that we rebuilt was solid concrete for the
    kitchen and bathroom, floorboards for the rest of the house.

    We knocked all the internal walls down, and rearranged the layout, as
    well as extending, so three mixtures of floor now, solid concrete,
    suspended, and block and beam. The bathroom is where the kitchen was,
    and the 'TV Room' is where the bathroom was, so a nice solid floor for
    that !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From S Viemeister@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Fri Aug 1 12:24:51 2025
    On 8/1/2025 10:14 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense.
    Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were inconvenient so it got bricked-up.  Eventually the door between kitchen
    and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of cabinets.

    My grandparents' 1930s home in Edinburgh had a hatch with a single
    sliding door.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 1 15:16:35 2025
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:52:55 +0100, tim+ wrote:

    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    Our bungalow is an "L" shape (sits on a corner plot) built in 1962/3

    Part of one side of the "L" is a solid floor (which is a PITA for running
    pipes from the boiler which have to go over the ceiling and down trunking
    on the wall).

    The rest is suspended (quite well - c. 24-30")

    It was clearly built like this, not retrofitted.

    Always intrigued me too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SH@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Fri Aug 1 17:17:53 2025
    On 01/08/2025 10:14, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense.
    Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were inconvenient so it got bricked-up.  Eventually the door between kitchen
    and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of cabinets.

    so how did the food get from the kitchen to the dining room and how did
    the dirty crockery and cutlery get from the dining room to the kitchen?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SH@21:1/5 to John R Walliker on Fri Aug 1 17:18:29 2025
    On 01/08/2025 14:40, John R Walliker wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 10:43, Tricky Dicky wrote:
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 07:59, John Armstrong wrote:

    in 1951 my family moved into a newly built house. I don't know about
    floor construction, but it had a hatch in the wall between kitchen and >>>> dining room.

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense.
    Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.


    The last house my parents owned was a 1962 three bedroom semi with a
    through lounge it too had a Serving hatch to the dining end of the
    lounge.
    This was quite convenient as otherwise it meant walking the full
    length of
    the corridor to access the lounge and then walking through the living
    room
    part to the dining area.

    Our last house was a 1957 three bedroom semi originally, it had a solid
    floor in what was originally the kitchen and suspended elsewhere. I do
    not
    know if it had a serving hatch as the wall between the original
    kitchen and
    dining room had already been removed before we moved in.

    We once had a hatch which was the right size for a cat to sit in it
    and warm himself in the heat of the radiator which was immediately
    below it.
    The cat would then be sick over the radiator fins which were almost impossible to clean, while the heat spread the aroma everywhere.
    John



    How sickening!

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 1 17:48:39 2025
    On 01/08/2025 17:17, SH wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 10:14, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly
    expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were
    inconvenient so it got bricked-up.  Eventually the door between
    kitchen and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of
    cabinets.

    so how did the food get from the kitchen to the dining room and how did
    the dirty crockery and cutlery get from the dining room to the kitchen?
    Via the hall?

    --
    I would rather have questions that cannot be answered...
    ...than to have answers that cannot be questioned

    Richard Feynman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to i.love@spam.com on Fri Aug 1 21:00:09 2025
    In article <106ipbh$gos5$1@dont-email.me>,
    SH <i.love@spam.com> wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 10:14, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense.
    Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were inconvenient so it got bricked-up. Eventually the door between kitchen
    and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of cabinets.

    so how did the food get from the kitchen to the dining room and how did
    the dirty crockery and cutlery get from the dining room to the kitchen?

    on a tray?

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indy Jess John@21:1/5 to Chris Hogg on Fri Aug 1 22:01:32 2025
    On 31/07/2025 22:00, Chris Hogg wrote:
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:50:09 +0100, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
    on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
    floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
    floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see. Why
    would it have been built like this?

    Dunno, but my parents (1949) 3 bed semi council house had the same
    arrangement.


    My small two-bed bungalow, built in 1959 has suspended floors in the
    kitchen and sitting room, but solid floors in the hall and two
    bedrooms. So it's not just prewar properties that have a bit of both.
    I don't see the point of some of each.

    My parents bought a post-war infill to a bombed gap in a long terrace.
    The ground floor was all solid floor - front room, back room and hallway
    with a cupboard under the stairs which held the electricity meter with
    the rest used for storage. I never found out where the water came in -
    the stopcock was by the front doorstep with a long stemmed T shape that
    was used to turn it on and off. The back room/living room coal fire had
    a back boiler that heated a hot water tank in a cupboard in the bedroom
    above. In hindsight it looks like a shortage of materials design.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to charles on Fri Aug 1 23:09:04 2025
    On 01/08/2025 10:00, charles wrote:
    In article <106hqqd$843c$1@dont-email.me>,
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 07:59, John Armstrong wrote:

    in 1951 my family moved into a newly built house. I don't know about
    floor construction, but it had a hatch in the wall between kitchen and
    dining room.

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense.
    Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    my parent's 1900ish house i Edinburgh had a substantial sized hatch. Good enough for children to hide in

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.


    Posh houses had dumb waiters. Even more fun for kids.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to S Viemeister on Fri Aug 1 23:13:53 2025
    On 01/08/2025 12:24, S Viemeister wrote:
    On 8/1/2025 10:14 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly
    expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were
    inconvenient so it got bricked-up.  Eventually the door between
    kitchen and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of
    cabinets.

    My grandparents' 1930s home in Edinburgh had a hatch with a single
    sliding door.

    Parents 1956-built house on land they owned, had a serving
    hatch as large as a 1 metre square window, with two
    sliding glass doors in wooden frames, curtain-style.

    The glass had an obscured wash-board effect and was presumably
    not safety glass, so they were soon covered with 'Fablon'?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Aug 1 23:20:10 2025
    On 01/08/2025 08:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 22:00, Chris Hogg wrote:
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:50:09 +0100, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
       on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
       floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
       floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see.  Why
       would it have been built like this?

    Dunno, but my parents (1949) 3 bed semi council house had the same
    arrangement.


    My small two-bed bungalow, built in 1959 has suspended floors in the
    kitchen and sitting room, but solid floors in the hall and two
    bedrooms. So it's not just prewar properties that have a bit of both.
    I don't see the point of some of each.

    It's quite expensive to pour a full slab and if the size is large, it's
    also quite cold. And quite ugly.

    But its not done like that. The construction slab is only
    rough-poured and only tamped to get it more or less
    level. On top of this is about 100mm of screed which does
    provide the necessary level floor. The screed has the sort
    of consistency of the centre of an aero chocolate bar which
    gives some insulation. All typically topped with Marley
    'plastic' tiles stuck down with some sort of black
    biutumastic goo.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat Aug 2 11:34:04 2025
    On 01/08/2025 23:20, Andrew wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 08:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 31/07/2025 22:00, Chris Hogg wrote:
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:50:09 +0100, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 31/07/2025 16:52, tim+ wrote:
    My daughter's new house is an ex-council, 1950s three bedroom semi
       on two floors.

    On the ground floor, the hall, bathroom and kitchen have solid
       floors, the adjacent lounge/dining room has a suspended
       floor.

    These parts have never been altered as far as I can see.  Why
       would it have been built like this?

    Dunno, but my parents (1949) 3 bed semi council house had the same
    arrangement.


    My small two-bed bungalow, built in 1959 has suspended floors in the
    kitchen and sitting room, but solid floors in the hall and two
    bedrooms. So it's not just prewar properties that have a bit of both.
    I don't see the point of some of each.

    It's quite expensive to pour a full slab and if the size is large,
    it's also quite cold. And quite ugly.

    But its not done like that. The construction slab is only
    rough-poured and only tamped to get it more or less
    level. On top of this is about 100mm of screed which does
    provide the necessary level floor. The screed has the sort
    of consistency of the centre of an aero chocolate bar which
    gives some insulation. All typically topped with Marley
    'plastic' tiles stuck down with some sort of black
    biutumastic goo.

    I know. But you cant screed a wooden floor can you?

    The whole poured slab/screed top is expensive ok?

    Compared with a few 6x3 and some crap pine boarding




    --
    In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act.

    - George Orwell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Aug 2 11:31:54 2025
    On 01/08/2025 22:00, charles wrote:
    In article <106ipbh$gos5$1@dont-email.me>,
    SH <i.love@spam.com> wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 10:14, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly expense. >>>> Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were
    inconvenient so it got bricked-up. Eventually the door between kitchen
    and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of cabinets.

    so how did the food get from the kitchen to the dining room and how did
    the dirty crockery and cutlery get from the dining room to the kitchen?

    on a tray?

    Or a trolley

    Or simply by hand in several trips

    --
    In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act.

    - George Orwell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 2 12:48:00 2025
    On 01/08/2025 17:17, SH wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 10:14, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid of
    it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly
    expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the late
    60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were
    inconvenient so it got bricked-up.  Eventually the door between
    kitchen and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of
    cabinets.

    so how did the food get from the kitchen to the dining room and how did
    the dirty crockery and cutlery get from the dining room to the kitchen?

    The servants carried it. <g>

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat Aug 2 20:46:10 2025
    On 01/08/2025 23:13, Andrew wrote:
    On 01/08/2025 12:24, S Viemeister wrote:
    On 8/1/2025 10:14 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Our mid-60s bungalow has a hatch. I've often though of getting rid
    of it, but it would take too much time, effort, and particularly
    expense. Anyway, it's almost entirely hidden behind the TV.

    I guess that, as a "functional feature", they disappeared in the
    late 60s or perhaps early 70s.

    My parents' 1968 house had a serving hatch, I remember the doors were
    inconvenient so it got bricked-up.  Eventually the door between
    kitchen and dining room was also bricked-up to allow a longer run of
    cabinets.

    My grandparents' 1930s home in Edinburgh had a hatch with a single
    sliding door.

    Parents 1956-built house on land they owned, had a serving
    hatch as large as a 1 metre square window, with two
    sliding glass doors in wooden frames, curtain-style.

    The glass had an obscured wash-board effect and was presumably
    not safety glass, so they were soon covered with 'Fablon'?

    Hiss! You're supposed to say "Sticky-backed plastic".

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)