• Re: Inheritance Tax

    From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 8 07:54:20 2025
    In message <lu5r9dF46b0U26@mid.individual.net>, at 23:22:21 on Tue, 7
    Jan 2025, Simon Parker <simonparkerulm@gmail.com> remarked:

    There's "working on" and "working on". Yes, the ordinary process
    will pause and there's no harm in that, but if in the mean time
    executors are making decisions they probably aren't entitled to, it
    would be good to have someone say "hold on a minute...".

    And how much are you prepared to pay the solicitor to contact A and B, >presumably via e-mail, during Christmas week to say "Hold on a
    minute...". Depending on your answer, I may be able to provide you
    with an e-mail address and mobile number for use in just such
    occasions. But as I've just said to another poster elsewhere, "I warn
    you that it will not be cheap".

    About £200.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 8 08:18:02 2025
    In message <lu5r9dF46b0U26@mid.individual.net>, at 23:22:21 on Tue, 7
    Jan 2025, Simon Parker <simonparkerulm@gmail.com> remarked:

    It's just general frustration that nothing seems to be able to be
    done (in any administrative process, not just lawyers) between about
    20th December and 6th January.

    Christmas specifically has been celebrated at this time since around
    the middle of the fourth century (except for a period from the
    mid-1640s until 1660) but the midwinter period was marked by ceremonies
    and merrymaking for thousands of years before this.

    In short, it is nothing new and should be expected.

    It's the result of the "Winter of Discontent" 1978/9, with bad weather
    and a multitude of industrial disputes resulting in many organisations
    deciding to close for the whole period between Xmas and New Year (which
    had only become a Bank Holiday in England in 1974).

    Previously, and especially before the New Year Bank Holiday, it was
    common that people only took Xmas Eve afternoon, Xmas and Boxing Day
    off.

    This has now crept, to the point that the period from the Friday before
    Xmas to the Monday after New Year is commonly a winter shutdown, to
    mirror the wakes weeks in summer in industry.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Wed Jan 8 11:36:43 2025
    On 08/01/2025 08:18, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <lu5r9dF46b0U26@mid.individual.net>, at 23:22:21 on Tue, 7
    Jan 2025, Simon Parker <simonparkerulm@gmail.com> remarked:

     It's just general frustration that nothing seems to be able to be
    done  (in any administrative process, not just lawyers) between about
    20th  December and 6th January.

    Christmas specifically has been celebrated at this time since around
    the middle of the fourth century (except for a period from the
    mid-1640s until 1660) but the midwinter period was marked by
    ceremonies and merrymaking for thousands of years before this.

    In short, it is nothing new and should be expected.

    It's the result of the "Winter of Discontent" 1978/9, with bad weather
    and a multitude of industrial disputes resulting in many organisations deciding to close for the whole period between Xmas and New Year (which
    had only become a Bank Holiday in England in 1974).

    Previously, and especially before the New Year Bank Holiday, it was
    common that people only took Xmas Eve afternoon, Xmas and Boxing Day off.

    This has now crept, to the point that the period from the Friday before
    Xmas to the Monday after New Year is commonly a winter shutdown, to
    mirror the wakes weeks in summer in industry.

    Depends on the company, and whether they regard their employees as "professionals".

    I joined a company in 1969, and had the whole of the Christmas period
    until the New Year off and fully paid - and a Christmas party in the
    Café Royal, Regent Street to boot.

    In 2008, in a different company, I was just paid for four hours worth of
    pay for Christmas and Boxing day, and only if I worked the rest of the Christmas/New Year period. And no party.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Saxman on Wed Jan 8 15:01:03 2025
    On 24/12/2024 19:36, Saxman wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 14:37, Norman Wells wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 12:42, Saxman wrote:
    My neighbour wants to retire to his Indian property with his wife and
    leave his UK flat (current residing property)to his only child for
    him to live in. Apparently anything above the value of £120,000 will
    be taxed at 28%.  If he leaves it to his wife, there is no tax to
    pay. The UK property is valued at about £215,000. His son was born in
    the UK.

    Is there a way of avoiding the tax?

    Yes, he could give the flat to his son now, and survive seven years more.



    I doubt he will survive another seven years, hence his decision to sort
    his will out.

    https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax/gifts

    The 7 year rule

    No tax is due on any gifts you give if you live for 7 years after giving
    them - unless the gift is part of a trust. This is known as the 7 year rule.

    If you die within 7 years of giving a gift and there’s Inheritance Tax
    to pay on it, the amount of tax due after your death depends on when you
    gave it.

    Gifts given in the 3 years before your death are taxed at 40%.

    Gifts given 3 to 7 years before your death are taxed on a sliding scale
    known as ‘taper relief’.

    Taper relief only applies if the total value of gifts made in the 7
    years before you die is over the £325,000 tax-free threshold.
    Taper relief
    Years between gift and death Rate of tax on the gift
    3 to 4 years 32%
    4 to 5 years 24%
    5 to 6 years 16%
    6 to 7 years 8%
    7 or more 0%

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 8 17:28:27 2025
    In message <vlm3ve$2r1cn$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:01:03 on Wed, 8 Jan
    2025, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> remarked:
    On 24/12/2024 19:36, Saxman wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 14:37, Norman Wells wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 12:42, Saxman wrote:
    My neighbour wants to retire to his Indian property with his wife
    and leave his UK flat (current residing property)to his only child
    for him to live in. Apparently anything above the value of
    £120,000 will be taxed at 28%.  If he leaves it to his wife,
    there is no tax to pay. The UK property is valued at about
    £215,000. His son was born in the UK.

    Is there a way of avoiding the tax?

    Yes, he could give the flat to his son now, and survive seven years more. >>>

    I doubt he will survive another seven years, hence his decision to
    sort his will out.

    https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax/gifts

    The 7 year rule

    No tax is due on any gifts you give if you live for 7 years after
    giving them - unless the gift is part of a trust. This is known as the
    7 year rule.

    If you die within 7 years of giving a gift and there’s Inheritance
    Tax to pay on it, the amount of tax due after your death depends on
    when you gave it.

    Gifts given in the 3 years before your death are taxed at 40%.

    Gifts given 3 to 7 years before your death are taxed on a sliding scale
    known as ‘taper relief’.

    Taper relief only applies if the total value of gifts made in the 7
    years before you die is over the £325,000 tax-free threshold.

    When added to the estate exceeds £325k, surely?

    Taper relief

    Years between gift and death Rate of tax on the gift
    3 to 4 years 32%
    4 to 5 years 24%
    5 to 6 years 16%
    6 to 7 years 8%
    7 or more 0%


    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Owen Rees@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Wed Jan 8 21:29:50 2025
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <vlm3ve$2r1cn$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:01:03 on Wed, 8 Jan
    2025, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> remarked:
    On 24/12/2024 19:36, Saxman wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 14:37, Norman Wells wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 12:42, Saxman wrote:
    My neighbour wants to retire to his Indian property with his wife
    and leave his UK flat (current residing property)to his only child
    for him to live in. Apparently anything above the value of
    £120,000 will be taxed at 28%.  If he leaves it to his wife,
    there is no tax to pay. The UK property is valued at about
    £215,000. His son was born in the UK.

    Is there a way of avoiding the tax?

    Yes, he could give the flat to his son now, and survive seven years more. >>>>

    I doubt he will survive another seven years, hence his decision to
    sort his will out.

    https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax/gifts

    The 7 year rule

    No tax is due on any gifts you give if you live for 7 years after
    giving them - unless the gift is part of a trust. This is known as the
    7 year rule.

    If you die within 7 years of giving a gift and there’s Inheritance
    Tax to pay on it, the amount of tax due after your death depends on
    when you gave it.

    Gifts given in the 3 years before your death are taxed at 40%.

    Gifts given 3 to 7 years before your death are taxed on a sliding scale
    known as ‘taper relief’.

    Taper relief only applies if the total value of gifts made in the 7
    years before you die is over the £325,000 tax-free threshold.

    When added to the estate exceeds £325k, surely?

    The page cited above uses the words exactly as quoted and includes an
    example.

    It looks as if taper relief applies only to gifts before death and those
    gifts are deducted from the allowance first so unless the total of gifts
    within seven years exceeds the allowance there is no taper relief.

    The example also deducts the oldest gift first so that the later gift gets taper relief at a lower rate.


    Taper relief

    Years between gift and death Rate of tax on the gift
    3 to 4 years 32%
    4 to 5 years 24%
    5 to 6 years 16%
    6 to 7 years 8%
    7 or more 0%



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 9 07:40:33 2025
    In message <vlmqoe$2vef7$1@dont-email.me>, at 21:29:50 on Wed, 8 Jan
    2025, Owen Rees <orees@hotmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <vlm3ve$2r1cn$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:01:03 on Wed, 8 Jan
    2025, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> remarked:
    On 24/12/2024 19:36, Saxman wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 14:37, Norman Wells wrote:
    On 24/12/2024 12:42, Saxman wrote:
    My neighbour wants to retire to his Indian property with his wife
    and leave his UK flat (current residing property)to his only child >>>>>> for him to live in. Apparently anything above the value of
    £120,000 will be taxed at 28%.  If he leaves it to his wife,
    there is no tax to pay. The UK property is valued at about
    £215,000. His son was born in the UK.

    Is there a way of avoiding the tax?

    Yes, he could give the flat to his son now, and survive seven years more. >>>>>

    I doubt he will survive another seven years, hence his decision to
    sort his will out.

    https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax/gifts

    The 7 year rule

    No tax is due on any gifts you give if you live for 7 years after
    giving them - unless the gift is part of a trust. This is known as the
    7 year rule.

    If you die within 7 years of giving a gift and there’s Inheritance
    Tax to pay on it, the amount of tax due after your death depends on
    when you gave it.

    Gifts given in the 3 years before your death are taxed at 40%.

    Gifts given 3 to 7 years before your death are taxed on a sliding scale
    known as ‘taper relief’.

    Taper relief only applies if the total value of gifts made in the 7
    years before you die is over the £325,000 tax-free threshold.

    When added to the estate exceeds £325k, surely?

    The page cited above uses the words exactly as quoted and includes an >example.

    The cited page is typically obfuscated, and looking at the examples it
    emerges that first of all you add up all the gifts, and claim taper
    relief if the total of gifts is greater than £325k. *Then* you add the
    rest of the estate and pay IHT on that part of the total above £325k.

    In other words, you don't get £325k relief on gifts, plus another
    £325k on the rest of the estate. Which was the point I was trying to
    make.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Thu Jan 9 01:16:06 2025
    On 08/01/2025 08:18 am, Roland Perry wrote:

    Simon Parker <simonparkerulm@gmail.com> remarked:

     It's just general frustration that nothing seems to be able to be
    done  (in any administrative process, not just lawyers) between about
    20th  December and 6th January.

    Christmas specifically has been celebrated at this time since around
    the middle of the fourth century (except for a period from the
    mid-1640s until 1660) but the midwinter period was marked by
    ceremonies and merrymaking for thousands of years before this.

    In short, it is nothing new and should be expected.

    It's the result of the "Winter of Discontent" 1978/9, with bad weather
    and a multitude of industrial disputes resulting in many organisations deciding to close for the whole period between Xmas and New Year (which
    had only become a Bank Holiday in England in 1974).

    Previously, and especially before the New Year Bank Holiday, it was
    common that people only took Xmas Eve afternoon, Xmas and Boxing Day off.

    That was England.

    In Scotland, there was a very obvious extra day.

    This has now crept, to the point that the period from the Friday before
    Xmas to the Monday after New Year is commonly a winter shutdown, to
    mirror the wakes weeks in summer in industry.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 9 09:03:40 2025
    In message <lu8malFjbugU1@mid.individual.net>, at 01:16:06 on Thu, 9 Jan
    2025, JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> remarked:
    On 08/01/2025 08:18 am, Roland Perry wrote:

    Simon Parker <simonparkerulm@gmail.com> remarked:

     It's just general frustration that nothing seems to be able to be >>>>done  (in any administrative process, not just lawyers) between
    about 20th  December and 6th January.

    Christmas specifically has been celebrated at this time since around
    the middle of the fourth century (except for a period from the
    mid-1640s until 1660) but the midwinter period was marked by
    ceremonies and merrymaking for thousands of years before this.

    In short, it is nothing new and should be expected.

    It's the result of the "Winter of Discontent" 1978/9, with bad
    weather and a multitude of industrial disputes resulting in many >>organisations deciding to close for the whole period between Xmas and
    New Year (which had only become a Bank Holiday in England in 1974).

    Previously, and especially before the New Year Bank Holiday, it was >>common that people only took Xmas Eve afternoon, Xmas and Boxing Day
    off.

    That was England.

    In Scotland, there was a very obvious extra day.

    But they didn't take Boxing Day as seriously as England.

    This has now crept, to the point that the period from the Friday
    before Xmas to the Monday after New Year is commonly a winter
    shutdown, to mirror the wakes weeks in summer in industry.



    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kat@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Thu Jan 9 10:36:55 2025
    On 09/01/2025 09:03, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <lu8malFjbugU1@mid.individual.net>, at 01:16:06 on Thu, 9 Jan 2025,
    JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> remarked:
    On 08/01/2025 08:18 am, Roland Perry wrote:

    Simon Parker <simonparkerulm@gmail.com> remarked:

     It's just general frustration that nothing seems to be able to be done >>>>> (in any administrative process, not just lawyers) between about  20th >>>>> December and 6th January.

    Christmas specifically has been celebrated at this time since around the >>>> middle of the fourth century (except for a period from the mid-1640s until >>>> 1660) but the midwinter period was marked by ceremonies and merrymaking for
    thousands of years before this.

    In short, it is nothing new and should be expected.

     It's the result of the "Winter of Discontent" 1978/9, with bad weather  and
    a multitude of industrial disputes resulting in many organisations  deciding
    to close for the whole period between Xmas and New Year (which  had only >>> become a Bank Holiday in England in 1974).

     Previously, and especially before the New Year Bank Holiday, it was common
    that people only took Xmas Eve afternoon, Xmas and Boxing Day off.

    That was England.

    In Scotland, there was a very obvious extra day.

    But they didn't take Boxing Day as seriously as England.


    I was very tiny at the time but I seem to think ( from anecdotes told in later years) my dad worked the 26th, possibly not a full day - or that might even have
    been the 25th.


    --
    kat
    >^..^<

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Thu Jan 9 11:09:59 2025
    On 09/01/2025 07:40, Roland Perry wrote:

    In other words, you don't get £325k relief on gifts, plus another £325k
    on the rest of the estate. Which was the point I was trying to make.

    Essentially, unless you survive 7 years, gifts of under £325k have no
    effect on IHT.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 9 11:56:53 2025
    In message <vloaq7$3absj$4@dont-email.me>, at 11:09:59 on Thu, 9 Jan
    2025, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:
    On 09/01/2025 07:40, Roland Perry wrote:

    In other words, you don't get £325k relief on gifts, plus another
    £325k on the rest of the estate. Which was the point I was trying to
    make.

    Essentially, unless you survive 7 years, gifts of under £325k have no
    effect on IHT.

    For the avoidance of doubt, do you mean "do not reduce IHT liability on
    the sums gifted".
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ian Jackson@21:1/5 to max_demian@bigfoot.com on Thu Jan 9 14:46:44 2025
    In message <vllo0b$2ohqn$2@dont-email.me>, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> writes
    On 08/01/2025 08:18, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <lu5r9dF46b0U26@mid.individual.net>, at 23:22:21 on Tue, 7
    Jan 2025, Simon Parker <simonparkerulm@gmail.com> remarked:

     It's just general frustration that nothing seems to be able to be >>>>done  (in any administrative process, not just lawyers) between
    about 20th  December and 6th January.

    Christmas specifically has been celebrated at this time since around
    the middle of the fourth century (except for a period from the
    mid-1640s until 1660) but the midwinter period was marked by
    ceremonies and merrymaking for thousands of years before this.

    In short, it is nothing new and should be expected.
    It's the result of the "Winter of Discontent" 1978/9, with bad
    weather and a multitude of industrial disputes resulting in many >>organisations deciding to close for the whole period between Xmas and
    New Year (which had only become a Bank Holiday in England in 1974).
    Previously, and especially before the New Year Bank Holiday, it was >>common that people only took Xmas Eve afternoon, Xmas and Boxing Day
    off.
    This has now crept, to the point that the period from the Friday
    before Xmas to the Monday after New Year is commonly a winter
    shutdown, to mirror the wakes weeks in summer in industry.

    Depends on the company, and whether they regard their employees as >"professionals".

    I joined a company in 1969, and had the whole of the Christmas period
    until the New Year off and fully paid - and a Christmas party in the
    Café Royal, Regent Street to boot.

    In 2008, in a different company, I was just paid for four hours worth
    of pay for Christmas and Boxing day, and only if I worked the rest of
    the Christmas/New Year period. And no party.

    I usually managed to take the whole week off as part of my annual leave
    (as did most of my co-workers). The absolutely, totally, very worst day
    of the year was the day we all trouped in on 2nd January, finding in the office, where we had left them, all the Christmas decorations and cards,
    and often quite a few empty booze bottles and unwashed glasses. It took
    some time to get back into the swing of things!
    --
    Ian
    Aims and ambitions are neither attainments nor achievements

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Thu Jan 9 18:00:11 2025
    On 09/01/2025 11:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <vloaq7$3absj$4@dont-email.me>, at 11:09:59 on Thu, 9 Jan
    2025, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:
    On 09/01/2025 07:40, Roland Perry wrote:

    In other words, you don't get £325k relief on gifts, plus another
    £325k  on the rest of the estate. Which was the point I was trying to
    make.

    Essentially, unless you survive 7 years, gifts of under £325k have no
    effect on IHT.

    For the avoidance of doubt, do you mean "do not reduce IHT liability on
    the sums gifted".

    No, but maybe I didn't explain clearly.

    Suppose I give £200k, having made no substantial gifts before, and then
    die 5 years later.

    That £200k is free of IHT, as it falls within my nil rate band ("NRB").
    But, it leaves only £125k of my NRB remaining when I die. Supposing my
    estate at death is £1m, my estate will pay £350k in IHT.

    If I hadn't made the £200k gift, my estate will be £1.2m (ignoring
    interest), but my full NRB will remain. My estate will pay £350k in IHT.

    As I said: Essentially, unless you survive 7 years, gifts of under £325k
    have no effect on IHT.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Owen Rees@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 9 23:01:11 2025
    On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 18:00:11 +0000, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid>
    wrote in <vlp2ra$3f1rb$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 09/01/2025 11:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <vloaq7$3absj$4@dont-email.me>, at 11:09:59 on Thu, 9 Jan
    2025, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:
    On 09/01/2025 07:40, Roland Perry wrote:

    In other words, you don't get £325k relief on gifts, plus another
    £325k  on the rest of the estate. Which was the point I was trying to
    make.

    Essentially, unless you survive 7 years, gifts of under £325k have no
    effect on IHT.

    For the avoidance of doubt, do you mean "do not reduce IHT liability on
    the sums gifted".

    No, but maybe I didn't explain clearly.

    Suppose I give £200k, having made no substantial gifts before, and then
    die 5 years later.

    That £200k is free of IHT, as it falls within my nil rate band ("NRB").
    But, it leaves only £125k of my NRB remaining when I die. Supposing my
    estate at death is £1m, my estate will pay £350k in IHT.

    If I hadn't made the £200k gift, my estate will be £1.2m (ignoring
    interest), but my full NRB will remain. My estate will pay £350k in IHT.

    As I said: Essentially, unless you survive 7 years, gifts of under £325k
    have no effect on IHT.

    I just looked up the legislation <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/51/section/7> and I think I
    finally understood the rather convoluted wording.

    The example given by GB is correct, but there is a twist.

    As I suspected from the previous example, the effect is that chargeable transfers within seven years of the death consume the nil rate band,
    oldest first.

    Unused nil rate band can be transferred to a spouse or civil partner so
    if some has been used up, less is available to transfer. The transfer is
    based on a percentage. There is no difference if the NRB upper limit
    remains the same but if it changes, the tax due on the estate of the
    survivor will change if it is over the survivor's NRB limit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)