The 'rogue trader' faced the oral examination today and it was a farce.
He was totally intimidating and agressive towards the claimant, bringing
her to tears...Anyway, he brought no documents to support anything so
all figures offered could not be substantiated. He also point blank
refused to divulge where he was living despite repeated requests from
the claimant and court official...After the hearing, the court official
told my friend ( claimant) the the whole EX140 would be passed up to a circuit Judge.
What is likely to happen now?
There is a hearing early April where the defendant has applied to have
the judgement set aside and the claimant will hope to get the interim
TPDO made final.
Further, the claimant requested that a friend accompany her in the
hearing, but that request was rejected. Is a friend permitted to
accompany a claimant at an oral examination ?
On 26/03/2025 23:06, Roger Hayter wrote:
On 26 Mar 2025 at 22:56:28 GMT, "TTman" <kraken.sankey@gmail.com>Just for moral support. The defendant is just 'the pits' and really laid
wrote:
The 'rogue trader' faced the oral examination today and it was a
farce. He was totally intimidating and agressive towards the claimant,
bringing her to tears...Anyway, he brought no documents to support
anything so all figures offered could not be substantiated. He also
point blank refused to divulge where he was living despite repeated
requests from the claimant and court official...After the hearing, the
court official told my friend ( claimant) the the whole EX140 would be
passed up to a circuit Judge.
What is likely to happen now?
There is a hearing early April where the defendant has applied to
have
the judgement set aside and the claimant will hope to get the interim
TPDO made final.
Further, the claimant requested that a friend accompany her in the
hearing, but that request was rejected. Is a friend permitted to
accompany a claimant at an oral examination ?
That seems odd, I thought in principle they were public hearings. Did
she want the friend to speak (which is probably not allowed unless they
are a witness) or just be there?
into the claimant trying to intimidate her...
The 'rogue trader' faced the oral examination today and it was a farce.
He was totally intimidating and agressive towards the claimant, bringing
her to tears...Anyway, he brought no documents to support anything so
all figures offered could not be substantiated. He also point blank
refused to divulge where he was living despite repeated requests from
the claimant and court official...After the hearing, the court official
told my friend ( claimant) the the whole EX140 would be passed up to a >circuit Judge.
What is likely to happen now?
There is a hearing early April where the defendant has applied to have
the judgement set aside and the claimant will hope to get the interim
TPDO made final.
Further, the claimant requested that a friend accompany her in the
hearing, but that request was rejected. Is a friend permitted to
accompany a claimant at an oral examination ?
Further, the claimant requested that a friend accompany her in the
hearing, but that request was rejected. Is a friend permitted to
accompany a claimant at an oral examination ?
On 24/04/2025 12:04, TTman wrote:
So, the claimant has issued the next order to attend for an oral
S.P.
hearing on the 14th May, with the threat of a suspended order for
committal for contempt of court.
The defendant has also decided to appeal against the Judge's
decision to refuse/dismiss the application to set aside. Good luck
with that!
With the best will in the world , I can't see any legal grounds for
that appeal to succeed . IMO the Judge covered every aspect of what
she was compelled to do according to CPRs, to arrive at her decision.
Update. The threat of another oral examination has promted the defendant
to request a final settlement figure. Clearly the application to appeal
was a bluff.Seems an Oral Examination order is the way to go when
dealing with a crook that has more money than sense !
The debtor has now paid in full, including all costs and interest to
date thus avoiding the awkward option of having to face an oral
examination under threat of commital to prison. RESULT.
The debtor has now paid in full, including all costs and interest to
date thus avoiding the awkward option of having to face an oral
examination under threat of commital to prison. RESULT.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 64:17:25 |
| Calls: | 9,813 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,754 |
| Messages: | 6,189,174 |