• Opposite of Antisemitism

    From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 18 15:09:26 2025
    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me
    very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he doesn't
    like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza
    and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all
    Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because of they
    way their system works I can't find the original post now, or even
    discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring things
    when they want to.

    To get to my original question, if anybody said something like this about Israel it seems to me it would qualify as antisemitic (although I accept I
    may be wrong). Is there a legal term to cover this malicious hatred of Palestinians or it is just a general hate crime? I can understand people's views about Hamas, or any other terrorist organisation, although whether
    this was an acceptable way to express the view I don't know.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists
    or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Mon May 19 10:44:43 2025
    On 18/05/2025 16:09, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I  mean. Netanyahu seems to me
    very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything  he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza
    and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because
    of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or
    even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring
    things when they want to.

    To get to my original question, if anybody said something like this
    about Israel it seems to me it would qualify as antisemitic (although I accept I may be wrong). Is there a legal term to cover this malicious
    hatred of Palestinians or it is just a general hate crime?

    I don't think antisemitism is a legal term. And, I can't think of a
    specific term for anti-Palestinianism. So, I guess it's all covered by
    racism.




    I can
    understand people's views about Hamas, or any other terrorist
    organisation, although whether this was an acceptable way to express the
    view I don't know.

    Hamas chose a course of action that was intended to provoke the current conflict. (I don't think the Israelis should have taken the bait, but
    that's another matter.) Hamas are prepared to sacrifice their civilian population for political purposes. So, yes, they are vile. (Oh, and I
    don't think highly of Netanyahu, either.)





    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Handsome Jack@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Mon May 19 11:05:46 2025
    On 18 May 2025 15:09:26 GMT, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me
    very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza
    and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because
    of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or
    even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring
    things when they want to.

    Seems to me you would have done much better to let it go. Then everyone
    could see just what sort of people we are supposed to be sympathising
    with.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 19 13:00:54 2025
    On 19/05/2025 10:44, GB wrote:
    On 18/05/2025 16:09, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I  mean. Netanyahu seems to
    me very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything  he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about
    Gaza and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all
    Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because
    of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or
    even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring
    things when they want to.

    To get to my original question, if anybody said something like this
    about Israel it seems to me it would qualify as antisemitic (although
    I accept I may be wrong). Is there a legal term to cover this
    malicious hatred of Palestinians or it is just a general hate crime?

    I don't think antisemitism is a legal term. And, I can't think of a
    specific term for anti-Palestinianism. So, I guess it's all covered by racism.




    I can understand people's views about Hamas, or any other terrorist
    organisation, although whether this was an acceptable way to express
    the view I don't know.

    Hamas chose a course of action that was intended to provoke the current conflict.

    Given Israel were given advanced warning of the impending attack, one
    wonders the purpose of Israel ignoring the threat.

    Perhaps to create a stick to beat Gazans?

    (I don't think the Israelis should have taken the bait, but
    that's another matter.) Hamas are prepared to sacrifice their civilian population for political purposes. So, yes, they are vile. (Oh, and I
    don't think highly of Netanyahu, either.)

    I'd put them on the same level? Both have committed war crimes, one just happens to continue their crime and add another crime of ethnic cleansing.

    Sadly it is another 17 months to the next elections of the Knesset. I
    suppose Netanyahu had 11 months to prepare for all this, maximising his
    hold to power.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 19 14:25:18 2025
    On 19/05/2025 in message <100f3aa$1j9ao$1@dont-email.me> Handsome Jack
    wrote:

    On 18 May 2025 15:09:26 GMT, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me >>very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza >>and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all >>Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because
    of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or
    even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring >>things when they want to.

    Seems to me you would have done much better to let it go. Then everyone
    could see just what sort of people we are supposed to be sympathising
    with.

    I can see you point but the the current situation where one group of
    people feel they can do what they like whilst trampling over everyone else winds me up, especially when it is used as an excuse for horrific slaughter.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his friends for his
    life.
    (Jeremy Thorpe, 1962)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Handsome Jack on Mon May 19 17:59:12 2025
    On 19/05/2025 12:05, Handsome Jack wrote:
    On 18 May 2025 15:09:26 GMT, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me
    very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza
    and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all
    Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because
    of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or
    even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring
    things when they want to.

    Seems to me you would have done much better to let it go. Then everyone
    could see just what sort of people we are supposed to be sympathising
    with.

    Am I one of "those people"? And, just run past me what I've done wrong
    exactly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Roger Hayter on Mon May 19 19:55:09 2025
    On 19/05/2025 19:37, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 19 May 2025 at 17:59:12 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:

    On 19/05/2025 12:05, Handsome Jack wrote:
    On 18 May 2025 15:09:26 GMT, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me >>>> very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza >>>> and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all
    Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because >>>> of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or
    even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring >>>> things when they want to.

    Seems to me you would have done much better to let it go. Then everyone
    could see just what sort of people we are supposed to be sympathising
    with.

    Am I one of "those people"? And, just run past me what I've done wrong
    exactly.

    I suppose that entirely depends on whether you agree with the sentiment above,
    that: "Hamas and all Palestinians should burn". If so, you are; if not, probably not.


    Do you think Handsome Jack was limiting his comment to people who solely
    say those particular words?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Hayter@21:1/5 to NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid on Mon May 19 18:37:24 2025
    On 19 May 2025 at 17:59:12 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:

    On 19/05/2025 12:05, Handsome Jack wrote:
    On 18 May 2025 15:09:26 GMT, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me
    very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza >>> and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all
    Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because
    of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or
    even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring
    things when they want to.

    Seems to me you would have done much better to let it go. Then everyone
    could see just what sort of people we are supposed to be sympathising
    with.

    Am I one of "those people"? And, just run past me what I've done wrong exactly.

    I suppose that entirely depends on whether you agree with the sentiment above, that: "Hamas and all Palestinians should burn". If so, you are; if not, probably not.

    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Mon May 19 17:55:48 2025
    On 19/05/2025 13:00, Fredxx wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 10:44, GB wrote:
    On 18/05/2025 16:09, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I  mean. Netanyahu seems to
    me very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything  he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about
    Gaza and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and
    all Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it
    took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down.
    Because of they way their system works I can't find the original post
    now, or even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at
    obscuring things when they want to.

    To get to my original question, if anybody said something like this
    about Israel it seems to me it would qualify as antisemitic (although
    I accept I may be wrong). Is there a legal term to cover this
    malicious hatred of Palestinians or it is just a general hate crime?

    I don't think antisemitism is a legal term. And, I can't think of a
    specific term for anti-Palestinianism. So, I guess it's all covered by
    racism.




    I can understand people's views about Hamas, or any other terrorist
    organisation, although whether this was an acceptable way to express
    the view I don't know.

    Hamas chose a course of action that was intended to provoke the
    current conflict.

    Given Israel were given advanced warning of the impending attack, one
    wonders the purpose of Israel ignoring the threat.

    There are two explanations. Conspiracy theory, or cock up.

    There are people on this NG who were unshakeable on the theory that the Bayesian was sunk by an underwater bomb (despite there being no sign of
    a hole). So, there will definitely be supporters on this NG for any
    conspiracy theory that you care to mention.

    Me? I'm used to people cocking up, being complacent, etc.




    Perhaps to create a stick to beat Gazans?

    That can't be disproved, but it doesn't make it true.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Hayter@21:1/5 to NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid on Mon May 19 19:42:52 2025
    On 19 May 2025 at 19:55:09 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:

    On 19/05/2025 19:37, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 19 May 2025 at 17:59:12 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote: >>
    On 19/05/2025 12:05, Handsome Jack wrote:
    On 18 May 2025 15:09:26 GMT, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me >>>>> very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza >>>>> and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all
    Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it >>>>> took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because >>>>> of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or >>>>> even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring >>>>> things when they want to.

    Seems to me you would have done much better to let it go. Then everyone >>>> could see just what sort of people we are supposed to be sympathising
    with.

    Am I one of "those people"? And, just run past me what I've done wrong
    exactly.

    I suppose that entirely depends on whether you agree with the sentiment above,
    that: "Hamas and all Palestinians should burn". If so, you are; if not,
    probably not.


    Do you think Handsome Jack was limiting his comment to people who solely
    say those particular words?

    I cannot know what posters on here get up to at home, but the words the two posters above wrote here apply only intemperate racist statements on Facebook which would probably be prosecuted as hate crimes if written about a group of Jews or Christians.


    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 19 21:17:51 2025
    On 19/05/2025 17:55, GB wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 13:00, Fredxx wrote:

    Given Israel were given advanced warning of the impending attack, one
    wonders the purpose of Israel ignoring the threat.

    There are two explanations. Conspiracy theory, or cock up.

    I'm always concerned about the context[1] of such 'warnings'.

    If this was a lone warning from a credible source, then anyone ignoring
    it was culpable.

    If however they get 47 such warnings every weekday, and many more over a weekend, it would be easy for the one real warning amongst them to slip
    through the net.

    [1] It's fairly obvious that we will never know that context.


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Vir Campestris@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue May 20 17:14:43 2025
    On 19/05/2025 21:17, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 17:55, GB wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 13:00, Fredxx wrote:

    Given Israel were given advanced warning of the impending attack, one
    wonders the purpose of Israel ignoring the threat.

    There are two explanations. Conspiracy theory, or cock up.

    I'm always concerned about the context[1] of such 'warnings'.

    If this was a lone warning from a credible source, then anyone ignoring
    it was culpable.

    If however they get 47 such warnings every weekday, and many more over a weekend, it would be easy for the one real warning amongst them to slip through the net.

    [1] It's fairly obvious that we will never know that context.


    I must admit I read that, and wondered about the source for his
    assertion. Back to you, Fred.

    Andy

    --
    Do not listen to rumour, but, if you do, do not believe it.
    Ghandi.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Vir Campestris on Tue May 20 21:35:13 2025
    On 20/05/2025 17:14, Vir Campestris wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 21:17, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 17:55, GB wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 13:00, Fredxx wrote:

    Given Israel were given advanced warning of the impending attack,
    one wonders the purpose of Israel ignoring the threat.

    There are two explanations. Conspiracy theory, or cock up.

    I'm always concerned about the context[1] of such 'warnings'.

    If this was a lone warning from a credible source, then anyone
    ignoring it was culpable.

    If however they get 47 such warnings every weekday, and many more over
    a weekend, it would be easy for the one real warning amongst them to
    slip through the net.

    [1] It's fairly obvious that we will never know that context.


    I must admit I read that, and wondered about the source for his
    assertion. Back to you, Fred.

    Much of the gathered intelligence will be classified for reasons of
    minimising embarrassment. However this make good reading and it's text
    is well referenced:

    https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-october-7-attack-an-assessment-of-the-intelligence-failings/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Wed May 21 18:48:49 2025
    On 20/05/2025 21:35, Fredxx wrote:
    On 20/05/2025 17:14, Vir Campestris wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 21:17, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 17:55, GB wrote:
    On 19/05/2025 13:00, Fredxx wrote:

    Given Israel were given advanced warning of the impending attack,
    one wonders the purpose of Israel ignoring the threat.

    There are two explanations. Conspiracy theory, or cock up.

    I'm always concerned about the context[1] of such 'warnings'.

    If this was a lone warning from a credible source, then anyone
    ignoring it was culpable.

    If however they get 47 such warnings every weekday, and many more
    over a weekend, it would be easy for the one real warning amongst
    them to slip through the net.

    [1] It's fairly obvious that we will never know that context.


    I must admit I read that, and wondered about the source for his
    assertion. Back to you, Fred.

    Much of the gathered intelligence will be classified for reasons of minimising embarrassment. However this make good reading and it's text
    is well referenced:

    https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-october-7-attack-an-assessment-of-the- intelligence-failings/


    TLDR, so I asked ChatGPT to summarise it, and it says the article
    supports it being a mess up on the part of the Israelis, which is what I
    had assumed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Roger Hayter on Sun May 25 08:26:30 2025
    On 19/05/2025 20:42, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 19 May 2025 at 19:55:09 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:

    On 19/05/2025 19:37, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 19 May 2025 at 17:59:12 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote: >>>
    On 19/05/2025 12:05, Handsome Jack wrote:
    On 18 May 2025 15:09:26 GMT, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I'm not sure if "opposite" is quite what I mean. Netanyahu seems to me >>>>>> very quick to shout "antisemitism" when anybody says anything he
    doesn't like about Israel.

    In one of the Facebook groups I follow there was a discussion about Gaza >>>>>> and somebody posted a comment along the lines that "Hamas and all
    Palestinians should burn"

    I reported it to Facebook, because it seemed highly offensive, and it >>>>>> took three attempts before they agreed and took the post down. Because >>>>>> of they way their system works I can't find the original post now, or >>>>>> even discover which group it was in, they are pretty good at obscuring >>>>>> things when they want to.

    Seems to me you would have done much better to let it go. Then everyone >>>>> could see just what sort of people we are supposed to be sympathising >>>>> with.

    Am I one of "those people"? And, just run past me what I've done wrong >>>> exactly.

    I suppose that entirely depends on whether you agree with the sentiment above,
    that: "Hamas and all Palestinians should burn". If so, you are; if not,
    probably not.


    Do you think Handsome Jack was limiting his comment to people who solely
    say those particular words?

    I cannot know what posters on here get up to at home, but the words the two posters above wrote here apply only intemperate racist statements on Facebook which would probably be prosecuted as hate crimes if written about a group of Jews or Christians.

    Oh, I think you can immediately discount the second of those. And almost certainly the first one as well.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)