• UK train companies could have to pay disabled passengers more compensat

    From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 18 16:40:09 2025
    Given how hard it already is to book accessible tickets, I can see it
    becoming impossible.


    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/may/18/uk-train-companies-could- have-to-pay-disabled-passengers-more-compensation-after-rule-change

    Railway operators in the UK could soon have to pay out far greater sums
    in compensation to disabled passengers left unable to access trains
    despite booking assistance.

    The rail regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), has warned
    companies running trains and stations that compensation claims for
    failures can no longer be limited to the cost of a ticket.

    The ORR is set to toughen up accessibility rules after a disabled
    passenger was awarded about 10 times as much by a court than by the rail ombudsman – £1,200 instead of £125 – after pre-booked assistance to board a train failed to materialise.

    Passengers with disabilities can request help with luggage, navigating
    stations and getting on and off trains, including the provision of ramps
    if needed, through the Passenger Assist service. It is bookable up to two
    hours before travel, but people report having often been left stranded on trains and platforms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 19 08:03:28 2025
    In message <100d2h9$fl49$3@dont-email.me>, at 16:40:09 on Sun, 18 May
    2025, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> remarked:
    Given how hard it already is to book accessible tickets, I can see it >becoming impossible.


    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/may/18/uk-train-companies-could- >have-to-pay-disabled-passengers-more-compensation-after-rule-change

    Railway operators in the UK could soon have to pay out far greater sums
    in compensation to disabled passengers left unable to access trains
    despite booking assistance.

    The rail regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), has warned
    companies running trains and stations that compensation claims for
    failures can no longer be limited to the cost of a ticket.

    The ORR is set to toughen up accessibility rules after a disabled
    passenger was awarded about 10 times as much by a court than by the rail >ombudsman – £1,200 instead of £125 – after pre-booked assistance
    to board
    a train failed to materialise.

    Passengers with disabilities can request help with luggage, navigating >stations and getting on and off trains, including the provision of ramps
    if needed, through the Passenger Assist service. It is bookable up to two >hours before travel, but people report having often been left stranded on >trains and platforms.

    Alternatively the train companies could simply turn up with the
    assistance where and when requested.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Walker@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Mon May 19 10:51:25 2025
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote in news:yWQnxRDAftKoFAN9@perry.uk:

    In message <100d2h9$fl49$3@dont-email.me>, at 16:40:09 on Sun, 18 May
    2025, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> remarked:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/may/18/uk-train-companies-coul
    d- have-to-pay-disabled-passengers-more-compensation-after-rule-change

    Railway operators in the UK could soon have to pay out far greater
    sums in compensation to disabled passengers left unable to access
    trains despite booking assistance.

    The rail regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), has warned
    companies running trains and stations that compensation claims for
    failures can no longer be limited to the cost of a ticket.


    Alternatively the train companies could simply turn up with the
    assistance where and when requested.

    And that is what the planned stick will be there to encourage.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Mon May 19 10:53:09 2025
    On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:03:28 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

    In message <100d2h9$fl49$3@dont-email.me>, at 16:40:09 on Sun, 18 May
    2025, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> remarked:
    Given how hard it already is to book accessible tickets, I can see it >>becoming impossible.


    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/may/18/uk-train-companies-
    could-
    have-to-pay-disabled-passengers-more-compensation-after-rule-change

    Railway operators in the UK could soon have to pay out far greater sums
    in compensation to disabled passengers left unable to access trains
    despite booking assistance.

    The rail regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), has warned
    companies running trains and stations that compensation claims for
    failures can no longer be limited to the cost of a ticket.

    The ORR is set to toughen up accessibility rules after a disabled
    passenger was awarded about 10 times as much by a court than by the rail >>ombudsman – £1,200 instead of £125 – after pre-booked assistance to >>board a train failed to materialise.

    Passengers with disabilities can request help with luggage, navigating >>stations and getting on and off trains, including the provision of ramps
    if needed, through the Passenger Assist service. It is bookable up to
    two hours before travel, but people report having often been left
    stranded on trains and platforms.

    Alternatively the train companies could simply turn up with the
    assistance where and when requested.

    Why on earth would they ever do that ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to Peter Walker on Mon May 19 11:29:25 2025
    On Mon, 19 May 2025 10:51:25 +0000, Peter Walker wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote in news:yWQnxRDAftKoFAN9@perry.uk:

    In message <100d2h9$fl49$3@dont-email.me>, at 16:40:09 on Sun, 18 May
    2025, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> remarked:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/may/18/uk-train-companies-coul >>>d- have-to-pay-disabled-passengers-more-compensation-after-rule-change

    Railway operators in the UK could soon have to pay out far greater sums >>>in compensation to disabled passengers left unable to access trains >>>despite booking assistance.

    The rail regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), has warned >>>companies running trains and stations that compensation claims for >>>failures can no longer be limited to the cost of a ticket.


    Alternatively the train companies could simply turn up with the
    assistance where and when requested.

    And that is what the planned stick will be there to encourage.

    Unlikely.

    The divide and conquer basis of English law against egregious
    transgressions of clear public policy are there for a reason.

    Unless and until there is a mechanism for all affected to join together
    in a single case - predicated upon the manifest lack of provision of
    facilities in spite of the operators legal obligtions - we will continue
    to read stories of people dragging themselves off trains. And planes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com on Mon May 19 12:56:40 2025
    Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:03:28 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

    Alternatively the train companies could simply turn up with the
    assistance where and when requested.

    Why on earth would they ever do that ?

    Well, they have some options:

    1. Withdraw the service
    2. Provide the service
    3. Fail to provide the service and pay the fine

    Since they're a heavily regulated industry #1 is going to have various statutory bodies come down on them hard. So they have to choose between #2
    and #3. As #3 is now more expensive, it'll incentivise them to provide #2.
    If they don't it's kerching to everyone affected, which is some help to
    their distress.

    Now, more of a threat to this is 'nationalisation' - ie putting the DfT in outright control, which they basically already are but with a private
    company offering them convenient cover in exchange for a minimal 'profit'. Today the DfT can give the TOC a kicking to tell them to fall into line.
    The private operator doffs its cap and says 'yes master, no master' and does what the DfT commands as they pay the piper and the private company is paid
    to be the punchbag.

    With the facade of the private company gone and operations taken in house,
    the DfT will be less mindful to give itself a kicking.

    In particular watch out for downgrading of the service offered, ie not
    full withdrawal but nibbling away at it.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon May 19 18:13:08 2025
    On 19/05/2025 12:56, Theo wrote:
    Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:03:28 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

    Alternatively the train companies could simply turn up with the
    assistance where and when requested.

    Why on earth would they ever do that ?

    Well, they have some options:

    1. Withdraw the service
    2. Provide the service
    3. Fail to provide the service and pay the fine

    Since they're a heavily regulated industry #1 is going to have various statutory bodies come down on them hard. So they have to choose between #2 and #3. As #3 is now more expensive, it'll incentivise them to provide #2. If they don't it's kerching to everyone affected, which is some help to
    their distress.

    Now, more of a threat to this is 'nationalisation' - ie putting the DfT in outright control, which they basically already are but with a private
    company offering them convenient cover in exchange for a minimal 'profit'. Today the DfT can give the TOC a kicking to tell them to fall into line.
    The private operator doffs its cap and says 'yes master, no master' and does what the DfT commands as they pay the piper and the private company is paid to be the punchbag.

    With the facade of the private company gone and operations taken in house, the DfT will be less mindful to give itself a kicking.

    In particular watch out for downgrading of the service offered, ie not
    full withdrawal but nibbling away at it.

    That is what I would expect, at some stations and at certain times of
    the day such as 9-5 and possibly weekdays only.

    A plausible excuse where the disabled person already has a mobility
    allowance to pay for such services.

    Theo


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)