Without reading too far, is that aimed at legal professionals, or the
"AI" (it's not intelligent) industry as a whole ? Or even further and
society as a whole ?
Without reading too far, is that aimed at legal professionals, or the
"AI" (it's not intelligent) industry as a whole ? Or even further and
society as a whole ?
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
Without reading too far, is that aimed at legal professionals, or the
"AI" (it's not intelligent) industry as a whole ? Or even further and
society as a whole ?
It's aimed at the legal profession and what they should and should not
be doing with AI and what could happen to them if they don't appreciate
what it can and cannot do.
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:55:23 +0000, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
Without reading too far, is that aimed at legal professionals, or the
"AI" (it's not intelligent) industry as a whole ? Or even further and
society as a whole ?
It's aimed at the legal profession and what they should and should not
be doing with AI and what could happen to them if they don't appreciate
what it can and cannot do.
You mean "AI". It's not intelligent. Naturally or artificially.
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:55:23 +0000, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
Without reading too far, is that aimed at legal professionals, or the
"AI" (it's not intelligent) industry as a whole ? Or even further and
society as a whole ?
It's aimed at the legal profession and what they should and should not
be doing with AI and what could happen to them if they don't appreciate
what it can and cannot do.
You mean "AI". It's not intelligent. Naturally or artificially.
I think I've already made my thoughts on so-called "AI" perfectly clear.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 16:16:20 -0000 (UTC), Jon Ribbens
<jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:55:23 +0000, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
Without reading too far, is that aimed at legal professionals, or the >>>>> "AI" (it's not intelligent) industry as a whole ? Or even further and >>>>> society as a whole ?
It's aimed at the legal profession and what they should and should not >>>> be doing with AI and what could happen to them if they don't appreciate >>>> what it can and cannot do.
You mean "AI". It's not intelligent. Naturally or artificially.
I think I've already made my thoughts on so-called "AI" perfectly clear.
What I want to know is: when and if this abomination they call
"artificial intelligence" is superseded by something artificial that
really is intelligent - what are they going to call it then?
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 16:16:20 -0000 (UTC), Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:55:23 +0000, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2025-06-07, Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
Without reading too far, is that aimed at legal professionals, or the >>>>> "AI" (it's not intelligent) industry as a whole ? Or even further and >>>>> society as a whole ?
It's aimed at the legal profession and what they should and should not >>>> be doing with AI and what could happen to them if they don't appreciate >>>> what it can and cannot do.
You mean "AI". It's not intelligent. Naturally or artificially.
I think I've already made my thoughts on so-called "AI" perfectly clear.
What I want to know is: when and if this abomination they call
"artificial intelligence" is superseded by something artificial that
really is intelligent - what are they going to call it then?
Nick
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 08:46:11 |
| Calls: | 10,388 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,835 |
| Posted today: | 1 |