• Re: Released, Charged, Suspected then Buggered Off.

    From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Wed Jul 30 09:51:15 2025
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:59:52 +0100, Nick Odell wrote:

    Suppose, for the sake of argument, a high-profile individual with international connections were to have been released from prison and
    then, almost immediately afterwards charged with two cases of
    harassment, wouldn't they have had their passport withdrawn because of
    the flight risk? Then suppose, again just for the sake of argument, that
    they were then later alleged to have committed an assault and were being sought by the police, wouldn't it then have been impossible for them to
    flee the country? Hypothetically speaking, that is.

    They may own several passports ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Odell@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 30 07:59:52 2025
    Suppose, for the sake of argument, a high-profile individual with
    international connections were to have been released from prison and
    then, almost immediately afterwards charged with two cases of
    harassment, wouldn't they have had their passport withdrawn because of
    the flight risk? Then suppose, again just for the sake of argument,
    that they were then later alleged to have committed an assault and
    were being sought by the police, wouldn't it then have been impossible
    for them to flee the country? Hypothetically speaking, that is.

    Nick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 30 12:00:02 2025
    On 30/07/2025 10:51, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:59:52 +0100, Nick Odell wrote:

    Suppose, for the sake of argument, a high-profile individual with
    international connections were to have been released from prison and
    then, almost immediately afterwards charged with two cases of
    harassment, wouldn't they have had their passport withdrawn because of
    the flight risk? Then suppose, again just for the sake of argument, that
    they were then later alleged to have committed an assault and were being
    sought by the police, wouldn't it then have been impossible for them to
    flee the country? Hypothetically speaking, that is.

    They may own several passports ?



    If ordered to surrender their passport, the order *ought* to be phrased
    so as to cover all such documents.

    And, of course, it is possible to have a forged passport, or even to
    borrow one from a mate. Said mate would need to be a very, very good
    mate indeed, as he might well be charged with assisting an offender.

    So, the only question left: Is being charged with two cases of
    harassment, sufficient reason to have had their passport withdrawn? I
    suppose it would depend on the facts of the alleged harassment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From billy bookcase@21:1/5 to Nick Odell on Wed Jul 30 08:46:44 2025
    "Nick Odell" <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:pufj8k9cvght53bq4lak58prppi3hkrgka@4ax.com...
    Suppose, for the sake of argument, a high-profile individual with international connections were to have been released from prison and
    then, almost immediately afterwards charged with two cases of
    harassment, wouldn't they have had their passport withdrawn because of
    the flight risk? Then suppose, again just for the sake of argument,
    that they were then later alleged to have committed an assault and
    were being sought by the police, wouldn't it then have been impossible
    for them to flee the country? Hypothetically speaking, that is.

    Nick


    quote:

    Written statement to Parliament
    The issuing, withdrawal or refusal of passports
    This written ministerial statement was laid in the House of Commons on
    25 April 2013 by Theresa May and in the House of Lords by Lord Taylor of Holbeach.


    A decision to refuse or withdraw a passport must be necessary
    and proportionate.

    [...]

    ii a person for whose arrest a warrant had been issued in the

    United Kingdom, or a person who was wanted by the United Kingdom

    police on suspicion of a serious crime; or

    iii a person who is the subject of:

    a.. a court order, made by a court in the United Kingdom, or any
    b.. other order made pursuant to a statutory power, which imposes
    c.. travel restrictions or restrictions on the possession of a valid
    d.. United Kingdom passport; or
    e.. bail conditions, imposed by a police officer or a court in the
    f.. United Kingdom, which include travel restrictions or restrictions
    g.. on the possession of a valid United Kingdom passport; or
    h.. an order issued by the European Union or the United Nations
    i.. which prevents a person travelling or entering a country other
    j.. than the country in which they hold citizenship; or
    :unquote


    https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-issuing-withdrawal-or-refusal-of-passports

    Presumably this a high-profile individual with international
    connections wasn't subject to any travel restrictions.

    Presumably this is linked to the relative seriousness of the
    offences; and the possible sentences. i.e would a person choose to
    become an international fugitive, in order to escape a 2 months jail
    sentence ? And thus lose the opportunity to stir up further
    trouble back home on his release.

    So that unless the EU or UN step in...



    bb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 30 15:58:17 2025
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 12:00:02 +0100, GB wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 10:51, Jethro_uk wrote:
    [quoted text muted]


    If ordered to surrender their passport, the order *ought* to be phrased
    so as to cover all such documents.

    The problem is that non-UK passports are not the property of the bearer,
    nor the UK government.

    Is it a condition of issue of any foreign passport that it must be
    surrendered to the UK authorities if they demand it ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 30 19:50:32 2025
    On 30/07/2025 16:58, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 12:00:02 +0100, GB wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 10:51, Jethro_uk wrote:
    [quoted text muted]


    If ordered to surrender their passport, the order *ought* to be phrased
    so as to cover all such documents.

    The problem is that non-UK passports are not the property of the bearer,
    nor the UK government.

    Is it a condition of issue of any foreign passport that it must be surrendered to the UK authorities if they demand it ?



    The UK authorities would not be taking over ownership, but merely
    providing safe keeping? I really can't see it causing a diplomatic incident.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From billy bookcase@21:1/5 to billy bookcase on Wed Jul 30 19:00:43 2025
    "billy bookcase" <billy@anon.com> wrote in message news:106cil4$33gs7$1@dont-email.me...

    "Nick Odell" <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:pufj8k9cvght53bq4lak58prppi3hkrgka@4ax.com...
    Suppose, for the sake of argument, a high-profile individual with
    international connections were to have been released from prison and
    then, almost immediately afterwards charged with two cases of
    harassment, wouldn't they have had their passport withdrawn because of
    the flight risk? Then suppose, again just for the sake of argument,
    that they were then later alleged to have committed an assault and
    were being sought by the police, wouldn't it then have been impossible
    for them to flee the country? Hypothetically speaking, that is.

    Nick


    quote:

    Written statement to Parliament
    The issuing, withdrawal or refusal of passports
    This written ministerial statement was laid in the House of Commons on
    25 April 2013 by Theresa May and in the House of Lords by Lord Taylor of Holbeach.


    A decision to refuse or withdraw a passport must be necessary
    and proportionate.

    [...]

    ii a person for whose arrest a warrant had been issued in the

    United Kingdom, or a person who was wanted by the United Kingdom

    police on suspicion of a serious crime; or

    iii a person who is the subject of:

    a.. a court order, made by a court in the United Kingdom, or any
    b.. other order made pursuant to a statutory power, which imposes
    c.. travel restrictions or restrictions on the possession of a valid
    d.. United Kingdom passport; or
    e.. bail conditions, imposed by a police officer or a court in the
    f.. United Kingdom, which include travel restrictions or restrictions
    g.. on the possession of a valid United Kingdom passport; or
    h.. an order issued by the European Union or the United Nations
    i.. which prevents a person travelling or entering a country other
    j.. than the country in which they hold citizenship; or
    :unquote


    https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-issuing-withdrawal-or-refusal-of-passports

    Presumably this a high-profile individual with international
    connections wasn't subject to any travel restrictions.

    Presumably this is linked to the relative seriousness of the
    offences; and the possible sentences. i.e would a person choose to
    become an international fugitive, in order to escape a 2 months jail
    sentence ? And thus lose the opportunity to stir up further
    trouble back home on his release.

    There is evidence that this person can afford the best legal advice
    financed by rich supporters.

    And so its reasonble to assume that this latter argument - his
    sole interst in promoting his ideas in the UK will be stresed
    by his brief at the first hearing in the Magistrtes Court.
    Where he was charged, gave his name, gave his plea, and if
    appropriate bail applied for and set. And his trisl date set
    at an appriopriate Court

    In short: given his stated long term objectives, unpalatable
    though they might be to the bench, he clearly poses no flight risk.


    bb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 08:08:33 2025
    In message <106ctvi$35qdn$1@dont-email.me>, at 12:00:02 on Wed, 30 Jul
    2025, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:
    On 30/07/2025 10:51, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:59:52 +0100, Nick Odell wrote:

    Suppose, for the sake of argument, a high-profile individual with
    international connections were to have been released from prison and
    then, almost immediately afterwards charged with two cases of
    harassment, wouldn't they have had their passport withdrawn because of
    the flight risk? Then suppose, again just for the sake of argument, that >>> they were then later alleged to have committed an assault and were being >>> sought by the police, wouldn't it then have been impossible for them to
    flee the country? Hypothetically speaking, that is.
    They may own several passports ?

    If ordered to surrender their passport, the order *ought* to be phrased
    so as to cover all such documents.

    And, of course, it is possible to have a forged passport, or even to
    borrow one from a mate. Said mate would need to be a very, very good
    mate indeed, as he might well be charged with assisting an offender.

    So, the only question left: Is being charged with two cases of
    harassment, sufficient reason to have had their passport withdrawn? I >suppose it would depend on the facts of the alleged harassment.

    That is almost entirely a matter for the magistrates when he has his
    bail conditions set.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Hayter@21:1/5 to NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid on Thu Jul 31 07:42:30 2025
    On 30 Jul 2025 at 19:50:32 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 16:58, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 12:00:02 +0100, GB wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 10:51, Jethro_uk wrote:
    [quoted text muted]


    If ordered to surrender their passport, the order *ought* to be phrased
    so as to cover all such documents.

    The problem is that non-UK passports are not the property of the bearer,
    nor the UK government.

    Is it a condition of issue of any foreign passport that it must be
    surrendered to the UK authorities if they demand it ?



    The UK authorities would not be taking over ownership, but merely
    providing safe keeping? I really can't see it causing a diplomatic incident.

    I believe that in many countries hotels insist on keeping people's passports.
    This doesn't seem to cause a problem for issuing countries.

    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jethro_uk@21:1/5 to Roger Hayter on Thu Jul 31 10:00:27 2025
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:42:30 +0000, Roger Hayter wrote:

    On 30 Jul 2025 at 19:50:32 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 16:58, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 12:00:02 +0100, GB wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 10:51, Jethro_uk wrote:
    [quoted text muted]


    If ordered to surrender their passport, the order *ought* to be
    phrased so as to cover all such documents.

    The problem is that non-UK passports are not the property of the
    bearer,
    nor the UK government.

    Is it a condition of issue of any foreign passport that it must be
    surrendered to the UK authorities if they demand it ?



    The UK authorities would not be taking over ownership, but merely
    providing safe keeping? I really can't see it causing a diplomatic
    incident.

    I believe that in many countries hotels insist on keeping people's
    passports.
    This doesn't seem to cause a problem for issuing countries.

    It does rather assume that people cannot hold more than one passport.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 12:07:20 2025
    In message <4774996351.20af2437@uninhabited.net>, at 07:42:30 on Thu, 31
    Jul 2025, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:
    On 30 Jul 2025 at 19:50:32 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 16:58, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 12:00:02 +0100, GB wrote:

    On 30/07/2025 10:51, Jethro_uk wrote:
    [quoted text muted]


    If ordered to surrender their passport, the order *ought* to be phrased >>>> so as to cover all such documents.

    The problem is that non-UK passports are not the property of the bearer, >>> nor the UK government.

    Is it a condition of issue of any foreign passport that it must be
    surrendered to the UK authorities if they demand it ?

    The UK authorities would not be taking over ownership, but merely
    providing safe keeping? I really can't see it causing a diplomatic incident.

    I believe that in many countries hotels insist on keeping people's passports.

    Not just hotels. The reception desk at several European Commission
    buildings does (for visitors).

    This doesn't seem to cause a problem for issuing countries.


    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)