• TfL to address safety concerns over drivers ignoring red lights at Bow

    From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 22 12:06:32 2023
    Transport for London (TfL) has told a London cyclist who complained about the danger posed by motorists jumping red lights at Bow Roundabout that its strategy and planning team is considering suggestions he made about how to improve safety there.

    Last month, we reported how Luke Redpath, who has to negotiate the roundabout by bike when travelling to and from his home in Romford to visit clients in the City, had been told by TfL that they were unable to take measures he suggested such as fitting
    cameras to catch motorists ignoring red lights.

    The reason they gave was that there was no history within the last three years of drivers going through red lights being a factor in collisions.

    But as we pointed out in our article, that was found to have been a potential factor in the death in October 2011 of Brian Dorling, one of three cyclists killed at Bow in the last three years.

    TfL has now told Mr Redpath, who had supplied it with links to videos shot by cyclists that showed drivers at Bow ignoring traffic signals, sometimes putting bike riders at risk, that his suggestions were now being looked at by its strategy and planning
    team.

    It said they would “investigate deterrent options for drivers going through red traffic light at this junction.”

    In his original email to TfL, sent on 10 September, Mr Redpath said: “I seriously urge you to take measures to reduce red light jumping at all the lights at the roundabout but particularly those on the roundabout itself.”

    His suggestions included installing red light cameras, changing the phasing of the lights, and putting up signs warning both motorists and cyclists of the potential danger.

    He added: “In an ideal world none of these things should be necessary but there are a lot of bad, dangerous drivers out there.”

    TfL has also told him that Metropolitan Police officers will now be monitoring Bow Roundabout as part of Operation Safety, which aims to crack down on anti-social or illegal road users, whether motorists or cyclists, and including those who jump red
    lights.

    Mr Redpath told road.cc: “I am pleased that TFL are taking steps to improve the situation although I remain sceptical that Operation Safeway is a good deterrent to his kind of problem, as it seems more focussed on handing out often patronising advice
    to cyclists (wear high-vis! etc) than actually engaging with or educating drivers. But it's a start.

    “Maybe instead of handing out safety leaflets to cyclists, they could start giving them out to drivers instead,” he added.

    https://road.cc/content/news/134598-tfl-address-safety-concerns-over-drivers-ignoring-red-lights-bow-roundabout

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Mon May 22 21:12:28 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:

    Transport for London (TfL) has told a London cyclist who complained about
    the danger posed by motorists jumping red lights at Bow Roundabout that
    its strategy and planning team is considering suggestions he made about
    how to improve safety there.

    Oh…the irony…you couldn’t make it up.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 22 21:38:22 2023
    QUOTE: TfL has now told Mr Redpath, who had supplied it with links to videos shot by cyclists that showed drivers at Bow ignoring traffic signals, sometimes putting bike riders at risk, that his suggestions were now being looked at by its strategy and
    planning team.

    It said they would “investigate deterrent options for drivers going through red traffic light at this junction.” ENDS

    Far more broken laws to go at.

    Speeding, parking the wrong way at night, on yellow lines, on zig zags, outside schools, pavement parking, obstructing traffic by inconsiderate parking, driving while drunk, on mobile phones, with no car tax, no licence, no insurance, no MOT, illegal
    plates, overtaking on double lines, due care, bald tyres, faulty brakes, one eyed monsters, no rear lights, no brake lights, no indicators, fog light abuse, faulty steering, windscreen obscuration, darkly tinted windows, child seat abuse, no seatbelts,
    insecure load, one way street abuse, amber/red light jumping, cycle box abuse, bus lane abuse, box junction abuse, death by dangerous driving, excess smoke and noise from exhaust, duff suspension, leaking oil, cash for crash fiddles, underage child in
    front, lights causing glare, over weight limit, ignoring no entry signs, parking without permit, not having control of your vehicle, improper use of horn, using horn at night, no in date photo licence, no licence application after long ban, without
    prescribed eyewear, failing to stop for police/lollipop/zebra etc - ran out of space.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Tue May 23 08:21:41 2023
    Mason seems to be saying that cyclists should be brought in to the full
    reach of motor-vehicle law.

    Bring it on…

    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: TfL has now told Mr Redpath, who had supplied it with links to
    videos shot by cyclists that showed drivers at Bow ignoring traffic
    signals, sometimes putting bike riders at risk, that his suggestions were
    now being looked at by its strategy and planning team.

    It said they would “investigate deterrent options for drivers going
    through red traffic light at this junction.” ENDS

    Far more broken laws to go at.

    Speeding, parking the wrong way at night, on yellow lines, on zig zags, outside schools, pavement parking, obstructing traffic by inconsiderate parking, driving while drunk, on mobile phones, with no car tax, no
    licence, no insurance, no MOT, illegal plates, overtaking on double
    lines, due care, bald tyres, faulty brakes, one eyed monsters, no rear lights, no brake lights, no indicators, fog light abuse, faulty steering, windscreen obscuration, darkly tinted windows, child seat abuse, no seatbelts, insecure load, one way street abuse, amber/red light jumping, cycle box abuse, bus lane abuse, box junction abuse, death by dangerous driving, excess smoke and noise from exhaust, duff suspension, leaking
    oil, cash for crash fiddles, underage child in front, lights causing
    glare, over weight limit, ignoring no entry signs, parking without
    permit, not having control of your vehicle, improper use of horn, using
    horn at night, no in date photo licence, no licence application after
    long ban, without prescribed eyewear, failing to stop for police/lollipop/zebra etc - ran out of space.





    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Tue May 23 08:33:34 2023
    QUOTE
    London’s Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) has footage that it
    claims shows a majority of cyclists ignoring the red light at a junction in Hackney. But our analysis of the complete video footage from one location
    shows that most cyclists obey the law.
    ENDQUOTE

    SO, why doesn’t road.cc analyse that footage with the same enthusiasm that they brought to the video taken by taxi drivers showing cyclists ignoring
    red lights at a junction in Hackney?

    [Rhetorical question]

    QUOTE
    London’s Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) has footage that it
    claims shows a majority of cyclists ignoring the red light at a junction in Hackney. But our analysis of the complete video footage from one location
    shows that most cyclists obey the law.

    The LTDA claims that of 170 cyclists who passed through the junction of
    Hackney Road and Queensbridge Road in the morning rush hour on one day in September, 108 failed to stop at the red light, a staggering 64 percent. At another junction in Camden, 86 out of 194 failed to stop.

    But we counted a total of 750 cyclists riding through the junction along Hackney Road toward the city centre. Of 243 who arrived when the light was
    red, 131 stopped.
    ENDQUOTE

    So 243 cyclists arrived at the red light, but only 131 stopped.

    102 cyclists ride through the red light, and road.cc appears to be saying
    this is OK.

    So why the fuss about Bow?

    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: TfL has now told Mr Redpath, who had supplied it with links to
    videos shot by cyclists that showed drivers at Bow ignoring traffic
    signals, sometimes putting bike riders at risk, that his suggestions were
    now being looked at by its strategy and planning team.

    It said they would “investigate deterrent options for drivers going
    through red traffic light at this junction.” ENDS

    Far more broken laws to go at.

    Speeding, parking the wrong way at night, on yellow lines, on zig zags, outside schools, pavement parking, obstructing traffic by inconsiderate parking, driving while drunk, on mobile phones, with no car tax, no
    licence, no insurance, no MOT, illegal plates, overtaking on double
    lines, due care, bald tyres, faulty brakes, one eyed monsters, no rear lights, no brake lights, no indicators, fog light abuse, faulty steering, windscreen obscuration, darkly tinted windows, child seat abuse, no seatbelts, insecure load, one way street abuse, amber/red light jumping, cycle box abuse, bus lane abuse, box junction abuse, death by dangerous driving, excess smoke and noise from exhaust, duff suspension, leaking
    oil, cash for crash fiddles, underage child in front, lights causing
    glare, over weight limit, ignoring no entry signs, parking without
    permit, not having control of your vehicle, improper use of horn, using
    horn at night, no in date photo licence, no licence application after
    long ban, without prescribed eyewear, failing to stop for police/lollipop/zebra etc - ran out of space.





    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Tue May 23 02:07:11 2023
    On Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 5:38:24 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: TfL has now told Mr Redpath, who had supplied it with links to videos shot by cyclists that showed drivers at Bow ignoring traffic signals, sometimes putting bike riders at risk, that his suggestions were now being looked at by its strategy and
    planning team.

    It said they would “investigate deterrent options for drivers going through red traffic light at this junction.” ENDS

    Here is the problem writ large.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwzSA0KXsAATHr7?format=jpg&name=medium

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 23 04:05:03 2023
    Aside from the most important cost – the safety of you and other road users – if caught, you'll be required to pay a fine. The current penalty for failing to stop for a red light is usually an £100 fine and 3 points on your licence. The points will
    stay on record for four years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian@21:1/5 to Spike on Tue May 23 10:50:47 2023
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:

    Mason seems to be saying that cyclists should be brought in to the full
    reach of motor-vehicle law.

    Bring it on…


    Indeed.

    Insurance, licensing, paying an annual ‘road tax’ ( note the quotes), a requirement to leave a distance when passing vehicles and pedestrians, DUI laws, …..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Tue May 23 14:05:24 2023
    On 23/05/2023 12:05 pm, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

    Aside from the most important cost – the safety of you and other road users – if caught, you'll be required to pay a fine. The current penalty for failing to stop for a red light is usually an £100 fine and 3 points on your licence. The points
    will stay on record for four years.

    What happens to chavs on bikes like you when they - as usual - disobey
    traffic signals and signage?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 23 06:34:53 2023
    Red light cameras detect vehicles which pass through lights after they’ve turned red by using sensors or ground loops in the road.

    When traffic lights are on red, the system becomes active and the camera is ready to photograph any car that passes over the trigger.

    It’s an offence for any part of your vehicle to pass the white stop line if a traffic light has turned red.

    The vast majority of red light cameras in the UK are made by Gatsometer.

    These Gatso RLC 36 units also have built-in radar technology, with dual speed and red light functions, so for the sake of safety and the law, avoid the temptation to put your foot down when they start to change.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed May 24 08:18:59 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:

    Here is the problem writ large.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwzSA0KXsAATHr7?format=jpg&name=medium

    Red lights aren’t the problem…

    QUOTE The parents of a Buckingham girl who was killed by a cyclist will be
    in the House of Commons later as their fight to change the law continues.

    Rhiannon Bennett, 17, was walking with friends when she was hit by cyclist Jason Howard on 2 April 2007.

    Howard was convicted of "dangerous cycling" and fined. Under the charge
    there was no penalty of imprisonment. ENDQUOTE

    QUOTE Over the past seven years [up to 2017] there have been 25 pedestrians killed in accidents with bikes and another 700 seriously injured – meaning roughly two people every week are being killed or badly hurt in crashes
    with bikes.

    The Department of Transport data shows three pedestrians were killed in
    crashes with bikes last year and another 112 were seriously injured.
    ENDQUOTE

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 24 01:34:32 2023
    As far as I am concerned stick cameras on every set of traffic lights, but also have a copper on duty to catch those who do not have registration numbers.

    Exactly. Driving standards are so abysmal that TfL should just automatically build in a camera at every traffic light they install - and then retrofit all the old ones.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed May 24 14:08:25 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    As far as I am concerned stick cameras on every set of traffic lights,
    but also have a copper on duty to catch those who do not have registration numbers.

    Exactly. Driving standards are so abysmal that TfL should just
    automatically build in a camera at every traffic light they install - and then retrofit all the old ones.

    Where would they send all the videos of cyclists jumping red lights?

    Suitable AI could be used the identify riders.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 24 08:28:24 2023
    I am very clear that the Inquest for Venera M wrongly blamed her for running the red light and being rear-ended (NOT SIDE SWIPED) by a truck which had just about reached 13mph and then after hitting Venera took 49 metres to come to a stop.

    A lot does not add up about the Police's responses to the Coroner's questions and the claim that she shot through on the inside to end up in front of the truck - well as a fit cyclist, she would be making a move like that at a speed of 15-20mph, hardly
    likely then to be rammed in the back by a truck doing 13mph. To make the suggested move, she would have had to pass within the range of the side detection system - tested, and working properly but not for the purposes of this inquest verdict (apparently)
    triggered by a cyclist passing on the nearside.

    The Police were adamant that there was no STATIONARY traffic which could have blocked Venera setting off with the green advance (2 seconds) on the motor traffic - but from a massive library of video evidence we know that circulating and MOVING traffic is
    blocking cyclists for up to 4 seconds of the 2 second head-start (see the blindingly obvious issue here?). Several videos confirm this issue, cyclists cannot get away when the advance signals go green and faster motor vehicles barge through and cut them
    off with a left turn.

    The inquest heard that the truck that killed Venera was not the front vehicle at the stop line. A light vehicle for which no details were offered by the Police or others set off ahead of the truck, and with the usual blocking of the advance start Venera
    would I suspect have been moving off as this untraced vehicle came upon her - perhaps forcing her to swerve or stop. If that vehicle had been a small van Venera would not have been visible to the truck driver - masked on the left side of the van, to the
    driver on the right side of the truck cab, and this detail exacerbated by the sweeping left bend.

    The untraced, mystery driver has I suspect forced Venera to swerve and slow to get back on course to head for the City, leaving her exposed and directly in front of the accelerating truck, and having been masked by the preceding vehicle she would then be
    well down below the screen line for the truck driver to see her as the masking effect of that vehicle cleared.

    The issue was clouded by the fact that when describing the traffic signal sequence, there was as far as I noted no mention of the fact that the circulating traffic phase preceded the cyclists early start, and what the overlap times were between the
    circulating traffic red signal appearing, and the cyclist getting their green - all 2 seconds of advance start!

    Many still use the far safer option of going over the flyover - on the roundabout 100% of the motor traffic WILL drive through the path of any cyclist on CS2 at least once, and the only way this is prevented is by all parties complying with the traffic
    signals. On the flyover the risk of any motor vehcle driving through the path of a cyclist is practically nil.

    The CS2 works on Stratford High Street have actually made things more dangerous for both drivers AND cyclists, with a major motor vehicle crash Eastbound where the flyover and slip road merge about 2 months ago, and a huge morning risk of left hooks or
    rear ending where a lot of traffic turns down Sugar Mill Lane and either charges through the CS2 lane or stops sharply with a less alert driver behind, plus cyclists heading over the flyover aslo move out to the outside lane (where previously they used
    the middle one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed May 24 15:43:28 2023
    When supposition is piled upon supposition, one can get any answer one
    wants.

    The second paragraph contains no less than three:

    …she would be…
    …hardly likely…
    …she would have had to…

    The rubbish posted below is not worth reading.

    Really, who wrote this expecting it to be authoritative?

    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    I am very clear that the Inquest for Venera M wrongly blamed her for
    running the red light and being rear-ended (NOT SIDE SWIPED) by a truck
    which had just about reached 13mph and then after hitting Venera took 49 metres to come to a stop.

    A lot does not add up about the Police's responses to the Coroner's
    questions and the claim that she shot through on the inside to end up in front of the truck - well as a fit cyclist, she would be making a move
    like that at a speed of 15-20mph, hardly likely then to be rammed in the
    back by a truck doing 13mph. To make the suggested move, she would have
    had to pass within the range of the side detection system - tested, and working properly but not for the purposes of this inquest verdict (apparently) triggered by a cyclist passing on the nearside.

    The Police were adamant that there was no STATIONARY traffic which could
    have blocked Venera setting off with the green advance (2 seconds) on the motor traffic - but from a massive library of video evidence we know that circulating and MOVING traffic is blocking cyclists for up to 4 seconds
    of the 2 second head-start (see the blindingly obvious issue here?).
    Several videos confirm this issue, cyclists cannot get away when the
    advance signals go green and faster motor vehicles barge through and cut
    them off with a left turn.

    The inquest heard that the truck that killed Venera was not the front
    vehicle at the stop line. A light vehicle for which no details were
    offered by the Police or others set off ahead of the truck, and with the usual blocking of the advance start Venera would I suspect have been
    moving off as this untraced vehicle came upon her - perhaps forcing her
    to swerve or stop. If that vehicle had been a small van Venera would not
    have been visible to the truck driver - masked on the left side of the
    van, to the driver on the right side of the truck cab, and this detail exacerbated by the sweeping left bend.

    The untraced, mystery driver has I suspect forced Venera to swerve and
    slow to get back on course to head for the City, leaving her exposed and directly in front of the accelerating truck, and having been masked by
    the preceding vehicle she would then be well down below the screen line
    for the truck driver to see her as the masking effect of that vehicle cleared.

    The issue was clouded by the fact that when describing the traffic signal sequence, there was as far as I noted no mention of the fact that the circulating traffic phase preceded the cyclists early start, and what the overlap times were between the circulating traffic red signal appearing,
    and the cyclist getting their green - all 2 seconds of advance start!

    Many still use the far safer option of going over the flyover - on the roundabout 100% of the motor traffic WILL drive through the path of any cyclist on CS2 at least once, and the only way this is prevented is by
    all parties complying with the traffic signals. On the flyover the risk
    of any motor vehcle driving through the path of a cyclist is practically nil.

    The CS2 works on Stratford High Street have actually made things more dangerous for both drivers AND cyclists, with a major motor vehicle crash Eastbound where the flyover and slip road merge about 2 months ago, and a huge morning risk of left hooks or rear ending where a lot of traffic
    turns down Sugar Mill Lane and either charges through the CS2 lane or
    stops sharply with a less alert driver behind, plus cyclists heading over
    the flyover aslo move out to the outside lane (where previously they used the middle one.




    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 24 08:50:40 2023
    QUOTE: “Maybe instead of handing out safety leaflets to cyclists, they could start giving them out to drivers instead,” he added. ENDS

    Waste of time - they don't even read the HC.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed May 24 15:55:54 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: “Maybe instead of handing out safety leaflets to cyclists, they could start giving them out to drivers instead,” he added. ENDS

    Waste of time - they don't even read the HC.

    Push off to your beloved Europe and give the group a break.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 24 09:33:11 2023
    QUOTE: Last month, we reported how Luke Redpath, who has to negotiate the roundabout by bike when travelling to and from his home in Romford to visit clients in the City, had been told by TfL that they were unable to take measures he suggested such as
    fitting cameras to catch motorists ignoring red lights. ENDS

    RLJ cameras are all over the place now.
    Ask Cycling Mikey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Mason@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed May 24 09:43:46 2023
    On Wednesday, 24 May 2023 at 17:33:12 UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: Last month, we reported how Luke Redpath, who has to negotiate the roundabout by bike when travelling to and from his home in Romford to visit clients in the City, had been told by TfL that they were unable to take measures he suggested such as
    fitting cameras to catch motorists ignoring red lights. ENDS

    RLJ cameras are all over the place now.
    Ask Cycling Mikey.

    Red light cameras detect vehicles which pass through lights after they’ve turned red by using sensors or ground loops in the road.

    When traffic lights are on red, the system becomes active and the camera is ready to photograph any car that passes over the trigger.

    It’s an offence for any part of your vehicle to pass the white stop line if a traffic light has turned red.

    The vast majority of red light cameras in the UK are made by Gatsometer.

    These Gatso RLC 36 units also have built-in radar technology, with dual speed and red light functions, so for the sake of safety and the law, avoid the temptation to put your foot down when they start to change.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Mason@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed May 24 09:44:56 2023
    On Wednesday, 24 May 2023 at 17:33:12 UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: Last month, we reported how Luke Redpath, who has to negotiate the roundabout by bike when travelling to and from his home in Romford to visit clients in the City, had been told by TfL that they were unable to take measures he suggested such as
    fitting cameras to catch motorists ignoring red lights. ENDS

    RLJ cameras are all over the place now.
    Ask Cycling Mikey.

    Does every traffic light have a camera?

    No, but they are quite common. Usually bigger and busier junctions have red light cameras; if a junction is a bit of an accident-prone area, then they're more likely to be installed as well.

    The best advice is just to treat every junction as if there are cameras, and be careful not to disobey the lights or drive over the white lines.
    Why do we need red light cameras?

    All traffic cameras are there for our safety. They’re typically installed in high-risk areas, perhaps where someone has previously been injured or an accident has occurred after a red light was run.

    At busy junctions and crossings you’ll often also see smaller cameras on top of the lights themselves. These are there to help monitor traffic and congestion on roads, but do not flash for driving offences.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed May 24 16:39:58 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: Last month, we reported how Luke Redpath, who has to negotiate the roundabout by bike when travelling to and from his home in Romford to
    visit clients in the City, had been told by TfL that they were unable to
    take measures he suggested such as fitting cameras to catch motorists ignoring red lights. ENDS

    RLJ cameras are all over the place now.
    Ask Cycling Mikey.

    What do they do with the videos of cyclist RLJ, then?

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)