• Heads up for Rhiannon day anniversary

    From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 10:21:34 2023
    Next week sees the FIFTEENTH anniversary of the passing of the cyclist hater's precious cause célèbre, "Rhiannon". Since her unfortunate demise, 337500 people have been killed or seriously injured by drivers, but they still roll out Rhiannon after
    dusting off the cobwebs, in a futile attempt to paint cyclists as some evil tribe of killers as they are so ashamed of admitting the vast scale of horrors, people crippled for life, kids with missing limbs, parents and schoolfriends, dead babies and
    elderly people they have meted out to innocent members of the public for which they should hang their heads in abject shame - if they cared, which they don't, of course.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 28 17:40:34 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:

    Next week sees the FIFTEENTH anniversary of the passing of the cyclist hater's precious cause célèbre, "Rhiannon".

    <snip>

    The writer of the above piece is jealous because an innocent pedestrian,
    who was studying management consultancy, has had more influence in the
    twisted world of cycling, than some petty, vindictive moron ever will
    have.

    PS: Mason is a year too late. Rhiannon was slaughtered by a cyclist in 2007
    - the 15th anniversary of her death was last year.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 11:29:38 2023
    StripeyKnickersSpottySocks · 12/07/2008 17:08

    I read he was on the road when he hit her, also the story I read last week made me think there was more to it than in this one. It hinted that there was a group of them on the pavement and in the road, drinking alcohol and not moving. I did wonder if
    they were almost playing chicken and thinking it was funny to make the cyclist move further out into the road. While he could and should have done one of her group said she had plenty of time to get out the way and didn't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 28 18:32:16 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    StripeyKnickersSpottySocks · 12/07/2008 17:08

    I read he was on the road when he hit her, also the story I read last
    week made me think there was more to it than in this one. It hinted that there was a group of them on the pavement and in the road, drinking
    alcohol and not moving. I did wonder if they were almost playing chicken
    and thinking it was funny to make the cyclist move further out into the
    road. While he could and should have done one of her group said she had plenty of time to get out the way and didn't.

    By piling supposition upon supposition, you can demonise just about anyone, even the innocent victim.

    Well done, you vindictive little person.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 28 12:30:50 2023
    On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 7:29:39 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    StripeyKnickersSpottySocks · 12/07/2008 17:08

    I read he was on the road when he hit her, also the story I read last week made me think there was more to it than in this one. It hinted that there was a group of them on the pavement and in the road, drinking alcohol and not moving. I did wonder if
    they were almost playing chicken and thinking it was funny to make the cyclist move further out into the road. While he could and should have done one of her group said she had plenty of time to get out the way and didn't.

    Boozed up teenagers playing silly buggers with live traffic on a public road - what could possibly go wrong?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 28 21:00:41 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 7:29:39 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    StripeyKnickersSpottySocks · 12/07/2008 17:08

    I read he was on the road when he hit her, also the story I read last
    week made me think there was more to it than in this one. It hinted that
    there was a group of them on the pavement and in the road, drinking
    alcohol and not moving. I did wonder if they were almost playing chicken
    and thinking it was funny to make the cyclist move further out into the
    road. While he could and should have done one of her group said she had
    plenty of time to get out the way and didn't.

    Boozed up teenagers playing silly buggers with live traffic on a public
    road - what could possibly go wrong?

    By piling supposition upon supposition, you can demonise just about anyone, even the innocent victim.

    Well done, you vindictive little person.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 14:08:30 2023
    QUOTE: The Conservative MP said: "Imagine if a motorist had mounted the pavement and killed a schoolgirl as she chatted to her friends.

    "The motorist would have felt the full force of the law and there would have been a national outcry if such a person had walked away with a fine." ENDS

    Bugger all would have happened - blinded by the Sun - no fine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 28 21:13:36 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: The Conservative MP said: "Imagine if a motorist had mounted the pavement and killed a schoolgirl as she chatted to her friends.

    "The motorist would have felt the full force of the law and there would
    have been a national outcry if such a person had walked away with a fine." ENDS

    Bugger all would have happened - blinded by the Sun - no fine.

    “Howard, of Buckingham, Buckinghamshire, hit Rhiannon as she walked with friends in Buckingham in April last year.

    He shouted at the youngsters to "move, because I'm not stopping" but rode
    into Rhiannon, Aylesbury Magistrates Court heard.

    The court heard that he could have swerved to avoid the girl but told
    police he thought a shout would be enough to avoid the collision.”

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Spike on Wed Jun 28 23:41:49 2023
    On 28/06/2023 10:13 pm, Spike wrote:

    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:

    QUOTE: The Conservative MP said: "Imagine if a motorist had mounted the
    pavement and killed a schoolgirl as she chatted to her friends.

    "The motorist would have felt the full force of the law and there would
    have been a national outcry if such a person had walked away with a fine." ENDS

    Bugger all would have happened - blinded by the Sun - no fine.

    “Howard, of Buckingham, Buckinghamshire, hit Rhiannon as she walked with friends in Buckingham in April last year.

    He shouted at the youngsters to "move, because I'm not stopping" but rode into Rhiannon, Aylesbury Magistrates Court heard.

    The court heard that he could have swerved to avoid the girl but told
    police he thought a shout would be enough to avoid the collision.”

    He *could* - had he been a normal person with a properly-developed sense
    of empathy and sense of the rights of other people - have *stopped*.

    But he didn't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 28 23:39:59 2023
    On 28/06/2023 07:29 pm, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    StripeyKnickersSpottySocks · 12/07/2008 17:08

    I read he was on the road when he hit her, also the story I read last week made me think there was more to it than in this one. It hinted that there was a group of them on the pavement and in the road, drinking alcohol and not moving. I did wonder if
    they were almost playing chicken and thinking it was funny to make the cyclist move further out into the road. While he could and should have done one of her group said she had plenty of time to get out the way and didn't.

    "not moving"

    What gives a chav-cyclist like you lot the right to run into a group of pedestrians (or even just one pedestrian) and commit what at best is manslaughter?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 22:59:07 2023
    ‘Death by dangerous cycling’ Bill looks doomed.

    While Andrea Leadsom MP vows to carry on despite the Commons setback, without Government backing her Private Members Bill on causing death by dangerous cycling is unlikely to progress further, according to the Guardian’s bike blog.

    Ms Leadsom’s campaign followed the death of Rhiannon Bennett who died after being struck by a cyclist.

    The proposal by Ms Leadsom, the Conservative MP for South Northamptonshire, was to introduce a specific offence of causing death by dangerous cycling. Ms Leadsom argued that a new law was necessary as the current offence of dangerous cycling has a
    maximum penalty of £2,500, with no possibility of a prison sentence.

    According to the Guardian blog, Mike Penning, road safety minister, promised he would back the proposal, and the DfT confirmed it would "consider the merits" of the new law.

    In April 2011, the Guardian ran a ‘Comment is Free’ article, voicing the concern of cycling groups about the proposed law. The main objection boiled down to the fact that pedestrian deaths from cyclists are so incredibly rare that the law would be
    both a near-irrelevance and a distraction from the greater peril posed to pedestrians (and other road users) from motor vehicles.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 29 08:11:27 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:

    ‘Death by dangerous cycling’ Bill looks doomed.

    Stop de walkermoord!

    In April 2011, the Guardian ran a ‘Comment is Free’ article, voicing the concern of cycling groups about the proposed law. The main objection
    boiled down to the fact that pedestrian deaths from cyclists are so incredibly rare that the law would be both a near-irrelevance and a distraction from the greater peril posed to pedestrians (and other road users) from motor vehicles.

    Ah! The morally-bankrupt “It’s only a few dead pedestrians” ‘argument’.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 29 03:08:38 2023
    On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 6:59:08 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    ‘Death by dangerous cycling’ Bill looks doomed.

    While Andrea Leadsom MP vows to carry on despite the Commons setback, without Government backing her Private Members Bill on causing death by dangerous cycling is unlikely to progress further, according to the Guardian’s bike blog.

    Ms Leadsom’s campaign followed the death of Rhiannon Bennett who died after being struck by a cyclist.

    The proposal by Ms Leadsom, the Conservative MP for South Northamptonshire, was to introduce a specific offence of causing death by dangerous cycling. Ms Leadsom argued that a new law was necessary as the current offence of dangerous cycling has a
    maximum penalty of £2,500, with no possibility of a prison sentence.

    According to the Guardian blog, Mike Penning, road safety minister, promised he would back the proposal, and the DfT confirmed it would "consider the merits" of the new law.

    In April 2011, the Guardian ran a ‘Comment is Free’ article, voicing the concern of cycling groups about the proposed law. The main objection boiled down to the fact that pedestrian deaths from cyclists are so incredibly rare that the law would be
    both a near-irrelevance and a distraction from the greater peril posed to pedestrians (and other road users) from motor vehicles.

    12 years later and no such law still exists - THAT'S how much "danger" there is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 29 04:01:15 2023

    In April 2011, the Guardian ran a ‘Comment is Free’ article, voicing the concern of cycling groups about the proposed law. The main objection boiled down to the fact that pedestrian deaths from cyclists are so incredibly rare that the law would
    be both a near-irrelevance and a distraction from the greater peril posed to pedestrians (and other road users) from motor vehicles.
    12 years later and no such law still exists - THAT'S how much "danger" there is.

    No plastic hats or number plates either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 29 10:41:09 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 6:59:08 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com

    ‘Death by dangerous cycling’ Bill looks doomed.

    12 years later and no such law still exists - THAT'S how much "danger" there is.

    Stop de walkermoord!


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 29 12:01:27 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:


    In April 2011, the Guardian ran a ‘Comment is Free’ article, voicing >>> the concern of cycling groups about the proposed law. The main
    objection boiled down to the fact that pedestrian deaths from cyclists
    are so incredibly rare that the law would be both a near-irrelevance
    and a distraction from the greater peril posed to pedestrians (and
    other road users) from motor vehicles.
    12 years later and no such law still exists - THAT'S how much "danger" there is.

    No plastic hats or number plates either.

    Stop de walkermoord!

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 29 05:34:25 2023
    QUOTE: Mr Bennett, 61, said: “Nothing has changed in the 10 years since we lost Rhiannon and started calling for a change in the law.

    “How many of the deaths since have been avoidable? ENDS

    In 2021, 361 pedestrians were killed in Great Britain by motor vehicles - so that's around 3610 avoidable pedestrian deaths in ten years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 29 13:30:07 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: Mr Bennett, 61, said: “Nothing has changed in the 10 years since
    we lost Rhiannon and started calling for a change in the law.

    “How many of the deaths since have been avoidable? ENDS

    In 2021, 361 pedestrians were killed in Great Britain by motor vehicles -
    so that's around 3610 avoidable pedestrian deaths in ten years.

    Keeping the slaughter of Rhiannon Bennett in mind,
    how many of those vehicle drivers shouted “Get out of the way, I’m not stopping” before killing a pedestrian?

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 29 08:28:06 2023
    QUOTE:/ Mr Bennett, 61, said: “Nothing has changed in the 10 years since we lost Rhiannon and started calling for a change in the law. /ENDS

    Wrong - LOTS of things have changed in those ten years - just not things involving your pet hobby horse.
    Government obviously had much more pressing matters to attend to.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Spike on Thu Jun 29 16:38:55 2023
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: Mr Bennett, 61, said: “Nothing has changed in the 10 years since >> we lost Rhiannon and started calling for a change in the law.

    “How many of the deaths since have been avoidable? ENDS

    In 2021, 361 pedestrians were killed in Great Britain by motor vehicles -
    so that's around 3610 avoidable pedestrian deaths in ten years.

    Keeping the slaughter of Rhiannon Bennett in mind,
    how many of those vehicle drivers shouted “Get out of the way, I’m not stopping” before killing a pedestrian?

    ‘Cycling and walking’ groups bang on endlessly about cycling infra and cycling deaths, while all but totally ignoring cases like that of Rhiannon Bennett and Kim Briggs.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 29 10:31:29 2023
    On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 4:28:08 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE:/ Mr Bennett, 61, said: “Nothing has changed in the 10 years since we lost Rhiannon and started calling for a change in the law. /ENDS

    Wrong - LOTS of things have changed in those ten years - just not things involving your pet hobby horse.
    Government obviously had much more pressing matters to attend to.

    Have a word with Baroness Vere of Norbiton - she seems to have her head screwed on when it comes to hare-brained anti cycling schemes.

    QUOTE: His plan could involve a requirement for cyclists to display number plates and buy insurance, as well as face prosecution for breaking road speed limits.

    This is despite nearly 60 times more pedestrians being killed in collisions with cars than bicycles, and many cyclists not being able to reach even 20mph. ENDS

    In November, roads minister Baroness Vere said the Government has “no plans to introduce a mandatory registration scheme for cycle ownership” as the costs of doing so would outweigh the benefits and it would “deter many people from cycling”.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 29 11:57:05 2023
    QUOTE: In December, the Department for Transport insisted that the government has “no intention” of making helmets mandatory, following a question from the Conservative MP for Shropshire constituency The Wrekin, Mark Pritchard.

    In response to the MP’s question, minister of state for the department Jesse Norman said the matter had been considered “at length” during the cycling and walking safety review in 2018.

    Norman, himself the Tory MP for Hereford and South Herefordshire, also added that while the Department for Transport “recommends that cyclists wear helmets”, the “safety benefits of mandating cycle helmets are likely to be outweighed by the fact
    that this would put some people off cycling”. ENDS

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Spike on Thu Jun 29 18:41:16 2023
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: Mr Bennett, 61, said: “Nothing has changed in the 10 years since >>> we lost Rhiannon and started calling for a change in the law.

    “How many of the deaths since have been avoidable? ENDS

    In 2021, 361 pedestrians were killed in Great Britain by motor vehicles - >>> so that's around 3610 avoidable pedestrian deaths in ten years.

    Keeping the slaughter of Rhiannon Bennett in mind,
    how many of those vehicle drivers shouted “Get out of the way, I’m not >> stopping” before killing a pedestrian?

    ‘Cycling and walking’ groups bang on endlessly about cycling infra and cycling deaths, while all but totally ignoring cases like that of Rhiannon Bennett and Kim Briggs.

    One of the oft-repeated shibboleths of the cycling world is that any kind
    of restriction placed on cyclists, such as helmets, hi-viz, registration, insurance, cycling tests, number plates, speed limits, traffic law
    alignment and the like, is that “It might deter people from taking up cycling”, completely ignoring the obvious fact that hordes of cyclists on pavements, out of all effective legal control, might put people off
    walking. But this is never mentioned, of course, cyclists being so self-entitled. It’s way past time to put a stop to this situation, and
    bring it under control. It could be called Rhiannon’s Law.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Spike on Thu Jun 29 21:15:16 2023
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    QUOTE: Mr Bennett, 61, said: “Nothing has changed in the 10 years since >>>> we lost Rhiannon and started calling for a change in the law.

    “How many of the deaths since have been avoidable? ENDS

    In 2021, 361 pedestrians were killed in Great Britain by motor vehicles - >>>> so that's around 3610 avoidable pedestrian deaths in ten years.

    Keeping the slaughter of Rhiannon Bennett in mind,
    how many of those vehicle drivers shouted “Get out of the way, I’m not >>> stopping” before killing a pedestrian?

    ‘Cycling and walking’ groups bang on endlessly about cycling infra and >> cycling deaths, while all but totally ignoring cases like that of Rhiannon >> Bennett and Kim Briggs.

    One of the oft-repeated shibboleths of the cycling world is that any kind
    of restriction placed on cyclists, such as helmets, hi-viz, registration, insurance, cycling tests, number plates, speed limits, traffic law
    alignment and the like, is that “It might deter people from taking up cycling”, completely ignoring the obvious fact that hordes of cyclists on pavements, out of all effective legal control, might put people off
    walking. But this is never mentioned, of course, cyclists being so self-entitled. It’s way past time to put a stop to this situation, and bring it under control. It could be called Rhiannon’s Law.

    Perhaps something simpler to start with might be compulsory safety
    equipment. It could be called Kim’s Law.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 29 22:52:40 2023
    QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Spike on Fri Jun 30 09:44:46 2023
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:

    ‘Cycling and walking’ groups bang on endlessly about cycling infra and >> cycling deaths, while all but totally ignoring cases like that of Rhiannon >> Bennett and Kim Briggs.

    One of the oft-repeated shibboleths of the cycling world is that any kind
    of restriction placed on cyclists, such as helmets, hi-viz, registration, insurance, cycling tests, number plates, speed limits, traffic law
    alignment and the like, is that “It might deter people from taking up cycling”, completely ignoring the obvious fact that hordes of cyclists on pavements, out of all effective legal control, might put people off
    walking. But this is never mentioned, of course, cyclists being so self-entitled. It’s way past time to put a stop to this situation, and bring it under control. It could be called Rhiannon’s Law.

    I can see why cyclists don’t want a ‘drunk cycling’ law brought in to stop
    this form of abuse, because not being able to get plastered down the pub
    and then cycle home, putting everyone else - themselves, drivers,
    pedestrians - at risk from this anti-social behaviour, might ‘put people
    off taking up cycling’. Which is, of course, yet another morally-bankrupt argument along with the pedestrian-slaughter ‘It’s only a few, not worth doing anything about it, bringing in reforms will only put people off’
    excuse for keeping cycling laws as they are: few and far between, and all
    but unenforced.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to the Chief Chav on Fri Jun 30 11:18:41 2023
    On 30/06/2023 06:52 am, the Chief Chav wrote:

    QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?

    She wasn't. But even if she had been, there is no law against that and certainly no law which allows a self-entitled chav-on-a-bike (like you,
    for instance) to administer capital punishment for it.

    She would have been over the limit with that amount.

    What "limit", chav?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 03:20:31 2023
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.

    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a disaster waiting to happen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 11:30:10 2023
    On 30/06/2023 11:20 am, swldx...@gmail.com [the Chief Chav] wrote,
    talking to himself again:

    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com [the Chief Chav] wrote:

    QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.

    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a disaster waiting to happen.

    Does the breathalyser limit apply to pedestrians?

    If it did, there would be no reason not to apply it to chavs on their chav-bikes, would there?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 03:39:40 2023
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 11:20:33 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.
    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a disaster waiting to happen.

    Lots of accounts of the girl thinking it was funny to force moving traffic to veer out into the centre of the carriageway.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 10:39:11 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or
    three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.

    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a disaster waiting to happen.

    You can denigrate anyone by piling supposition upon supposition in order to draw the conclusion you want.

    Why not keep to the realities of the case, which are far removed from your silly attempt to shift the blame onto the dead victim and away from the
    cyclist killer.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 10:42:55 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 11:20:33 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote: >>> QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or
    three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.
    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a
    disaster waiting to happen.

    Lots of accounts of the girl thinking it was funny to force moving
    traffic to veer out into the centre of the carriageway.

    And who authorised the death penalty for that?

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 10:47:04 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 11:20:33 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote: >>> QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or
    three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.
    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a
    disaster waiting to happen.

    Lots of accounts of the girl thinking it was funny to force moving
    traffic to veer out into the centre of the carriageway.

    So let me get this right; cyclists can cycle home from the pub while
    blatted out of their brains, but pedestrians can’t as they are subject to motor vehicle legislation? Where is this jurisdiction, Bedlam, Cycletopia,
    or Amsterdam?

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 30 03:57:43 2023
    QUOTE: Speeding cyclist ENDS

    QUOTE: Jason Howard, 35, hit speeds of at least 23mph ." ENDS

    Since when was 23mph "speeding" in a 30mph road?
    Of course, speed limits do not apply in any case.

    QUOTE: Mr Thompson said Howard maintained that Rhiannon was walking in the road when he struck her. ENDS

    Indeed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 13:33:47 2023
    On 30/06/2023 11:39 am, swldx...@gmail.com [the Chief Chav] wrote:

    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 11:20:33 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com [the Chief Chav] wrote:

    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com [the Chief Chav] wrote:

    QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.

    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a disaster waiting to happen.

    Lots of accounts of the girl thinking it was funny to force moving traffic to veer out into the centre of the carriageway.

    The carriageway was in a cul-de-sac at the back of some shops.

    There can be little doubt that your fellow chav (on the bike) was on the footway for most of his journey in that location.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 13:35:55 2023
    On 30/06/2023 11:57 am, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: Speeding cyclist ENDS

    QUOTE: Jason Howard, 35, hit speeds of at least 23mph ." ENDS

    Since when was 23mph "speeding" in a 30mph road?
    Of course, speed limits do not apply in any case.

    QUOTE: Mr Thompson said Howard maintained that Rhiannon was walking in the road when he struck her. ENDS

    So what?

    If that meant anythi ng at all, it would mean that it was alright to run
    chavs on bikes off the road.

    You see?

    Put a silly argument (like yours) and watch as it gets the reductio ad
    absurdem treatment.

    [You can look that up, if you know how to.]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 30 06:21:52 2023
    QUOTE: He pointed out people convicted of dangerous driving can be imprisoned but dangerous cycling only carries a maximum fine of £2,500.ENDS

    Why don't you campaign for a change in the law - or has someone else failed in that quest?
    It failed as the governement does not see it as a major problem - maybe try the European courts.
    Oh, you can't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 30 08:43:31 2023
    QUOTE: He pointed out people convicted of dangerous driving can be imprisoned but dangerous cycling only carries a maximum fine of £2,500.ENDS

    Why don't you campaign for a change in the law - or has someone else failed in that quest?
    It failed as the government does not see it as a major problem - maybe try the European courts.
    Oh, you can't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Spike on Fri Jun 30 16:01:40 2023
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 11:20:33 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:52:43 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> QUOTE: Aylesbury magistrates were told that Rhiannon had drunk "two or >>>> three" cans of lager before the collision.ENDS

    What was a 17 year old doing drinking alcohol in the street?
    She would have been over the limit with that amount.
    Being over the DD limit and then playing chicken in live traffic is a
    disaster waiting to happen.

    Lots of accounts of the girl thinking it was funny to force moving
    traffic to veer out into the centre of the carriageway.

    So let me get this right; cyclists can cycle home from the pub while
    blatted out of their brains, but pedestrians can’t as they are subject to motor vehicle legislation? Where is this jurisdiction, Bedlam, Cycletopia,
    or Amsterdam?

    Another way to progress Rhiannon/Kim’s Law is to take it to the European Court Of Human Rights, an application to which can be lodged by an
    individual, a group of individuals, or one or more of the other contracting states, of which, as we all know, the UK is a founding member. It is not an
    EU body.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Fri Jun 30 10:04:08 2023
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 4:43:33 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: He pointed out people convicted of dangerous driving can be imprisoned but dangerous cycling only carries a maximum fine of £2,500.ENDS

    Why don't you campaign for a change in the law - or has someone else failed in that quest?
    It failed as the government does not see it as a major problem - maybe try the European courts.
    Oh, you can't.

    Look at and study why you are not getting your wish granted.
    Compare the problems.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fz4teVwXgAA8y6e?format=jpg&name=medium

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Sat Jul 1 07:04:13 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 4:43:33 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: He pointed out people convicted of dangerous driving can be
    imprisoned but dangerous cycling only carries a maximum fine of £2,500.ENDS >>
    Why don't you campaign for a change in the law - or has someone else
    failed in that quest?
    It failed as the government does not see it as
    a major problem - maybe try the European courts.
    Oh, you can't.

    Look at and study why you are not getting your wish granted.
    Compare the problems.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fz4teVwXgAA8y6e?format=jpg&name=medium

    How did Rhiannon Bennett, killed by a cyclist who was merely fined, get
    painted out of that picture?

    Kim Briggs was killed by a cyclist in 2015.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 1 03:28:16 2023
    QUOTE: "When this first happened, we thought we would be looking at manslaughter or murder." Mrs Bennett added: "It's a life, he should have had a prison sentence. ENDS

    Now you know how the families of cyclists feel when killer drivers walk away with a suspended sentence or a paltry fine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Sat Jul 1 04:58:32 2023
    On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:28:19 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: "When this first happened, we thought we would be looking at manslaughter or murder." Mrs Bennett added: "It's a life, he should have had a prison sentence. ENDS

    Now you know how the families of cyclists feel when killer drivers walk away with a suspended sentence or a paltry fine.

    ONE OF MANY:

    “Why didn’t you see him?” That was the question posed in court this week by the family of a cyclist who was struck from behind and killed by a former HGV driver, as the motorist was handed a nine-month suspended sentence for causing the father-of-
    two’s death.

    41-year-old David Jones was cycling on the A48 Crack Hill in Bridgend at around 5.50am on 27 May 2020 when he was hit from behind by 74-year-old Raymond Treharne driving a 4x4 Grand Cherokee Jeep, Wales Online reports (link is external).

    Jones was thrown in the air in the collision and suffered a serious head injury. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Sun Jul 2 07:23:41 2023
    swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:28:19 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: "When this first happened, we thought we would be looking at
    manslaughter or murder." Mrs Bennett added: "It's a life, he should have
    had a prison sentence. ENDS

    Now you know how the families of cyclists feel when killer drivers walk
    away with a suspended sentence or a paltry fine.

    ONE OF MANY:

    “Why didn’t you see him?” That was the question posed in court this week
    by the family of a cyclist who was struck from behind and killed by a
    former HGV driver, as the motorist was handed a nine-month suspended
    sentence for causing the father-of-two’s death.

    41-year-old David Jones was cycling on the A48 Crack Hill in Bridgend at around 5.50am on 27 May 2020 when he was hit from behind by 74-year-old Raymond Treharne driving a 4x4 Grand Cherokee Jeep, Wales Online reports (link is external).

    Jones was thrown in the air in the collision and suffered a serious head injury. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

    The cyclist killers of Kim Briggs and Elizabeth Stone had to wait days
    before their victims died; six days and four days respectively. Sakhine
    Cihan died the next day, while Peter McCombie hung on for 8 days.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to swldx...@gmail.com on Sun Jul 2 02:24:58 2023
    On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 12:58:34 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:28:19 AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
    QUOTE: "When this first happened, we thought we would be looking at manslaughter or murder." Mrs Bennett added: "It's a life, he should have had a prison sentence. ENDS

    Now you know how the families of cyclists feel when killer drivers walk away with a suspended sentence or a paltry fine.
    ONE OF MANY:

    “Why didn’t you see him?” That was the question posed in court this week by the family of a cyclist who was struck from behind and killed by a former HGV driver, as the motorist was handed a nine-month suspended sentence for causing the father-of-
    two’s death.

    41-year-old David Jones was cycling on the A48 Crack Hill in Bridgend at around 5.50am on 27 May 2020 when he was hit from behind by 74-year-old Raymond Treharne driving a 4x4 Grand Cherokee Jeep, Wales Online reports (link is external).

    Jones was thrown in the air in the collision and suffered a serious head injury. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

    Killer walked away as a free man - disgusting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swldxer1958@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 2 03:05:59 2023
    A van driver who admitted causing the death of a cyclist by careless driving was today (Mon) given a suspended jail sentence.

    Dean Holderness, 36, was involved in a collision with cyclist Stuart Lees, 50, on the A1104 at Snape Hill, Saleby, near Alford in March 2020.

    Mr Lees was airlifted to hospital with serious injuries but Lincolnshire Police confirmed on April 1, 2020 that he had died.

    Holderness, now 37, of Marston Crescent, New Lodge, Barnsley, was initially charged with the more serious offence of causing Mr Lees’ death by dangerous driving, which he denied.

    And on the second day of his trial at Lincoln Crown Court in January, Holderness pleaded guilty to a count of causing death by careless driving on the A1104 on March 23, 2020.

    The Crown Prosecution Service offered no evidence on the original charge and the jury were discharged from reaching a verdict.

    Judge James House KC adjourned sentence for the preparation of a probation report and a psychological report on Holderness.

    Holderness was today sentenced to four months imprisonment suspended for 18 months by Judge House.

    He was also to complete 200 hours of unpaid work in the community and was disqualified from driving for 12 months.

    In a statement read out after Holderness entered his guilty plea his barrister Simon Eckersley said on his behalf: “I will plead guilty to causing death by careless driving. I accept that when I attempted to pass Stuart Lees, in the circumstances of
    the situation including the prevailing wind, I did not give Mr Lees sufficient space.

    “This was driving below the required standard.”

    Mr Eckersley said Holderness, a delivery driver and father-of-two, had also demonstrated considerable remorse.

    https://thelincolnite.co.uk/2023/03/van-driver-avoids-jail-after-taking-responsibility-for-fatal-accident/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)