Jeremy Vine has shared footage of a terrifying and shocking incident in London this morning which left him desperately banging on the back of a van…
…as the driver reversed over his bike having turned onto a stretch of cycling infrastructure.
https://road.cc/content/news/jeremy-vine-makes-lucky-escape-bike-run-over-303837
Avatar
Velo-drone replied to Left_is_for_Losers | 262 posts | 38 min ago
5 likes
Feels like you're perhaps a little blinded by your Vine-ophobia. He does "cycle around the truck" - which is when it reverses into him.
I did have to watch it a couple of times before I realised that truck had actually driven into a cycle lane. In that context, I get why he would
be trying to reverse out - but he did not do so safely, most likely due
to panic having realised his previous error.
Not sure that you are really in a place to judge from your sofa someone's actions when they've just been driven into by a 7.5 ton vehicle, and literally nearly killed. Perhaps you've not heard of "adrenalin"? Or
"fight or flight" responses? The "ordinary soul" is very likely indeed
to bang on a truck in that situation, especially if it is giving every indication that it may continue to reverse and further crush your bike.
No-one wants their bike crushed, whether they can afford it or not. But
most of all, no-one wants to be in a position where they could have been killed by a driver's lack of care or attention.
Velo-drone replied to IanMK | 262 posts | 1 hour ago
7 likes
He does report incidents. There's no law about not putting footage on social media.
Nah, the truck turned, Jeremy was continuing on his merry way with a clear lane, then without thought, the driver reversed. It's a big hoop to leap through to expect another road user to consider that driver doing that.
What else was the driver going to do other than continue going the wrong
way into a 2 way street?
He had to reverse, that was obvious. Placing yourself into the blind spot
of a lorry that has to reverse is pretty dim on any scale.
However , that doesn't detract from the drivers responsibilities to
ensure it was safe to do so. At least give a few seconds warning after putting into reverse before actually moving.
That's staggeringly absurd, did you actually look at what happened? The driver made an illegal turn into the cycle lane, forcing Vine to slow
almost to a standstill.
QUOTE: At the end of the clip, the van driver moves forward, releasing Vine's bike from under it, as the scene unfolds next to a 'give way to oncoming cycles' sign. ENDS
Ah but was the sign written in Klingon though? :-)
QUOTE: At the end of the clip, the van driver moves forward, releasing
Vine's bike from under it, as the scene unfolds next to a 'give way to oncoming cycles' sign. ENDS
Ah but was the sign written in Klingon though? :-)
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:26:49/AM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
QUOTE: At the end of the clip, the van driver moves forward, releasing
Vine's bike from under it, as the scene unfolds next to a 'give way to
oncoming cycles' sign. ENDS
Ah but was the sign written in Klingon though? :-)
Nope - that's definitely written in English.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5_Qrl8WIAAxEQJ?format=png&name60x360
mattw | 701 posts | 6 hours ago
2 likes
This incident reminds me a little of the "Reverse up the one way street killed pedestrian" one in Wigton.
======================================
" A VAN driver who ran over and killed an elderly pedestrian after
reversing through a no entry sign and then the wrong way along a narrow one-way residential town street has been jailed.
https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/23414744.carlisle-van-driver-jailed-death-pedestrian-wigton/
𝙰𝚗𝚍𝚢 𝙿𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚎␍␊👨🏻💻🌐
@Cartroo
·
Sep 13
Van driver attempts to drive down a cycle lane and then, having realised
the mistake, *blindly* reverses into an active lane of traffic, colliding with a cyclist in the process. Still some defend him. What does a driver
have to do for everyone to agree they did something wrong?!
INDEED.
swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
Velo-drone replied to IanMK | 262 posts | 1 hour ago
7 likes
He does report incidents. There's no law about not putting footage on social media.
In the recent flurry of postings about the cyclist that kneed a little girl to the ground, note that there was a groundswell of opinion by cyclists
that such videos should not be put on social media!
Now they are saying the opposite!
Cyclists, eh? Not the sharpest of tools…
swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
Jeremy Vine has shared footage of a terrifying and shocking incident in
London this morning which left him desperately banging on the back of a van…
“…desperately banging on the back of a van…” in best drama-queen fashion
rather than getting himself out of the danger zone, his bike not being recoverable at that point. It does make for a dramatic video, though,
noting that he sounded his hooter only when the incident was unfolding
rather than as a preliminary warning.
What possessed Vine to stop behind the van in the first place?
If this represents Vine’s attitude to good and safe cycling, he should take up walking instead.
One has to wonder why he attracts so much aggravation.
…as the driver reversed over his bike having turned onto a stretch of
cycling infrastructure.
https://road.cc/content/news/jeremy-vine-makes-lucky-escape-bike-run-over-303837
𝙰𝚗𝚍𝚢 𝙿𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚎␍␊👨🏻💻🌐they did something wrong?!
@Cartroo
·
Sep 13
Van driver attempts to drive down a cycle lane and then, having realised the mistake, *blindly* reverses into an active lane of traffic, colliding with a cyclist in the process. Still some defend him. What does a driver have to do for everyone to agree
Spike <aero.spike@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
Jeremy Vine has shared footage of a terrifying and shocking incident in
London this morning which left him desperately banging on the back of a van…
“…desperately banging on the back of a van…” in best drama-queen fashion
rather than getting himself out of the danger zone, his bike not being
recoverable at that point. It does make for a dramatic video, though,
noting that he sounded his hooter only when the incident was unfolding
rather than as a preliminary warning.
What possessed Vine to stop behind the van in the first place?
If this represents Vine’s attitude to good and safe cycling, he should take
up walking instead.
One has to wonder why he attracts so much aggravation.
…as the driver reversed over his bike having turned onto a stretch of
cycling infrastructure.
https://road.cc/content/news/jeremy-vine-makes-lucky-escape-bike-run-over-303837
Vine would have been in no danger if he hadn’t gone through a red light.
Even then, he had more than enough time to get out of the way.
Obviously, the driver made a mistake, which he then tried to correct, only
to be hampered by an idiot on a bike vandalising his vehicle.
Vine should be charge with criminal damage.
𝙰𝚗𝚍𝚢 𝙿𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚎␍␊👨🏻💻🌐they did something wrong?!
@Cartroo
·
Sep 13
Van driver attempts to drive down a cycle lane and then, having realised the mistake, *blindly* reverses into an active lane of traffic, colliding with a cyclist in the process. Still some defend him. What does a driver have to do for everyone to agree
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/speeding-uninsured-driver-who-killed-27414182
𝙰𝚗𝚍𝚢 𝙿𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚎␍␊👨🏻💻🌐they did something wrong?!
@Cartroo
·
Sep 13
Van driver attempts to drive down a cycle lane and then, having realised the mistake, *blindly* reverses into an active lane of traffic, colliding with a cyclist in the process. Still some defend him. What does a driver have to do for everyone to agree
INDEED.
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 5:37:59 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:agree they did something wrong?!
𝙰𝚗𝚍𝚢 𝙿𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚎␍␊👨🏻💻🌐
@Cartroo
·
Sep 13
Van driver attempts to drive down a cycle lane and then, having realised the mistake, *blindly* reverses into an active lane of traffic, colliding with a cyclist in the process. Still some defend him. What does a driver have to do for everyone to
A banned driver has been convicted of causing the death of a five-year-old boy who fell under the wheels of his van.
Little Layton Darwood tragically died after falling under the trailer of a Ford Transit Tipper he had been clambering on in Willow Avenue, Fenham, Newcastle, on August 24, 2020. Darren Jacques was behind the wheel at the time, but the 40-year-old waspreviously banned from driving. Jacques from Hutton Hill, Penrith, Cumbria, had just started to drive away when Layton became trapped, ChronicleLive reported.
Jacques stood trial at Newcastle Crown Court, charged with causing death by driving whilst disqualified. On Monday, a jury of 12 people found him guilty. On that day, Layton had been out with three other children. They had gone into a nearby shop topurchase sweets and picnic supplies, after the eldest in the group was given a bank card.
Meanwhile, Jacques had parked his work van, towing a trailer with a small differ on the back, on a kerb outside the same shop, where he was buying alcohol. CCTV footage showed Jacques leaving the shop and jogging past Layton and other children on hisway back to his vehicle.
However, while Jacques' vehicle was stationary, Layton climbed onto the trailer and the vehicle. As Jacques began to drive off, Layton tragically fell and was run over by the trailer's wheels, resulting in fatal injuries. The court heard that Laytonmay have tripped due to his shoelaces getting caught before falling under the wheels.
Sergeant Alan Keenleyside, a Forensic Collision Investigator for Northumbria Police, testified during the trial, stating his belief that Jacques was aware of the children's presence and should have exercised "greater care" when moving his vehicle.young boy was pronounced dead in hospital later that day. A post-mortem examination confirmed that the force exerted by the trailer's wheels rolling over Layton accounted for his fatal injuries.
Upon the arrival of the police, Jacques initially provided false personal details, including his name, date of birth, and address. He later confessed his real identity, explaining that he had "panicked". Despite emergency efforts to save Layton, the
Judge Adams told Jacques that sentencing would be deferred to a later date and ordered a pre-sentence report to be compiled. The judge told Jacques to expect an immediate custodial sentence, granting him bail until his subsequent court appearance.
A provisional sentencing date was set for Monday, December 4.
agree they did something wrong?!Van driver attempts to drive down a cycle lane and then, having realised the mistake, *blindly* reverses into an active lane of traffic, colliding with a cyclist in the process. Still some defend him. What does a driver have to do for everyone to
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 36:13:42 |
Calls: | 10,392 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 14,064 |
Messages: | 6,417,152 |