• =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_=e2=80=98Crackdown_on_selfish_drivers_who_cause_dai?= =

    From JNugent@21:1/5 to Simon Mason on Sun Feb 4 17:39:01 2024
    On 04/02/2024 02:21 pm, Simon Mason wrote:

    QUOTE: For those relying on guide dogs, their only option is often to put themselves at risk by stepping into busy roads to avoid parked cars.ENDS

    Poor dogs don't deserve that level of verbal and physical abuse from selfish twats.

    But as we all know, that's the MO for chav-cyclists: the stream of
    obscenities loudly directed at anybody and anything that has the
    temerity to be in their way on the FOOTway.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Simon Mason on Sun Feb 4 21:24:05 2024
    On 04/02/2024 07:09 pm, Simon Mason wrote:

    Such an occasion came last week at City of Edinburgh Council transport committee when councillors from all five parties; Liberal Democrat, SNP, Labour, Conservative and Green; voted to fully enforce a new ban on pavement parking from the New Year.

    The idea of a ban has been a long time coming. For those of us who have championed and campaigned for a change in law for so long, it’s with a mix of joy and relief that we know the ban will, at last, be in force.

    I’ll hold my hands up. For me, this is personal. After a long period of ill health, my own mother now gets out and about because of her mobility scooter.

    Yet, too often, she is forced off pavements because drivers have recklessly blocked the pavements where she lives.

    It means she’s forced to travel on and down roads, often suffering verbal abuse from drivers in the process. It can be the same story for those with buggies, pushchairs, and prams. Those with visual impairments are impacted too.

    This is why last week’s decision was such an important and positive step. This simple change in the law can and will make a big difference to the lives of many hundreds of people across our city.

    I’m also proud that Edinburgh has taken such a strong lead on this. There are so many areas where the city council either gets it wrong or is simply too slow to act.

    However, Edinburgh will be one of the very first local authorities anywhere in Scotland to fully implement and enforce the new pavement parking ban. Of course, it’s important that people are made fully aware of the change.

    The Council also has an important role in enforcing the new law properly.

    For now though, let’s take a moment to treasure this decision, and celebrate the fact all political parties put aside their squabbles to take it together.

    What would be the point in clearing FOOTways if chav-cyclists just took
    them over as chav-speedways?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Simon Mason on Mon Feb 5 14:13:37 2024
    On 05/02/2024 07:05 am, Simon Mason wrote:

    QUOTE: “We welcomed the Government’s recognition of the problem but now is the time to make good on their promise and give local councils the power to tackle problem pavement parking in their areas.” ENDS

    The fly tipping scum get their vehicles crushed - how about doing that with pavement parkers too?

    And "pavement"* chav-cyclists too?

    [* FOOTways]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Simon Mason on Wed Feb 7 14:11:48 2024
    On 07/02/2024 03:05 am, Simon Mason wrote:

    Neighbours are being asked to snitch on drivers who park inconsiderately in a new police crackdown - but the scheme has been called a waste of officers' time by the body that represents them.
    The new scheme, called Operation Chatty, aims to catch people parking illegally by obstructing footpaths with a trial having launched in the north of Norwich.
    While the scheme has the support of anti-car campaigners, others have questioned the use of resources.
    One Norwich dad has spent years campaigning for the police to do something about inconsiderate drivers obstructing footpaths.
    Liam Calvert, a member of Car-Free Norwich,

    Hahaha!

    said he started a three-year crusade after finding it difficult to push a pushchair down city streets.
    He said: "With twins in a pushchair it was almost impossible to get anywhere and there's a limit to what you can do with notes on cars.

    Surely he's old enough to walk by now and doesn't need his mum to push
    him in a wheelchair?

    "I recently had a couple in their late 80s telling me she had struggled to get past a car and she took a fall seriously injuring herself."
    Mr Calvert said a lot of people are uncomfortable talking to police and do not want to get in trouble with their neighbours but hoped they would feel comfortable reporting by email.
    "On and off over the years I have been hassling the police to do something about pavement parking.
    "The police always came back arguing that parking was not their responsibility, they say it is the local authority.
    "There's no need for everyone else to have to go through this to convince the police to do something about it."
    Mr Calvert said after researching the issue he found the police did have a responsibility if the pavement was obstructed.
    Anyone caught causing dangerous obstruction could be issued a fixed penalty notice of £90.

    And any chav found (or reported as) riding a chav-bike on the FOOTway
    could be issued a similar penalty. And they are campaigning for "clear pavements" [sic] only because they want the FOOTways clear for them on
    their chav-bikes.

    [There - thread now back on-topic.]

    However, the scheme raises various questions, such as what it means for areas where there is no space not to park on the pavement.

    No problem. Such areas are not suitable for the garaging of motor
    vehicles, any more then the seventh floor of May Sun's council tower
    block flats is.

    Andy Symonds, chairman of the Norfolk Police Federation raised concerns about what it means for police resources but said it is incumbent on the police to try to tackle pavement parking.

    What does it have to do with the Federation?

    It is surely an area command issue (superintendent level).

    He said: "In the grand scheme of things police have probably got more important things to get on with rather than reviewing pictures of a pavement.

    Ah well... perhaps the Federation do have a valid viewpoint. But really,
    it isn't their business, any more than setting the council tax is the
    business of NALGO or successors.

    "Officers are dealing with domestic incidents and robberies and all the things that you want us to deal with.
    "If they want to add this to our list of priorities I would say we have got more important things to be getting on with."
    However, he also said the force cannot simply say "no" to tackling these issues and it was right for the community team to act on them.
    He said: "I trust them to make the right calls in terms of how they deal with these reports of inconsiderate/nuisance parking."
    A police spokeswoman said: "This is a targeted response to a community issue that has been raised with local officers.
    "Whilst it is predominantly for the council to enforce parking issues, we will always strive to work with our partners to address matters that mean the most to our communities."
    While there are currently no plans to expand the scheme beyond north Norwich, anyone with concerns about illegal parking can contact their local safer neighbourhood team.
    How will it work?
    It will see members of the public asked to dob in their neighbours by emailing the police with a picture, vehicle details and times and dates of the offence.

    I bet May Sun will already be looking for a council house swap for one
    in North Norwich so that he can indulge in an orgy of "dobbing in" his
    new neighbours.

    That's right up his narrow street, so to speak.

    Officers will then review and look to educate the vehicle's owner by sending them a letter.
    If the obstruction persists they would then look to speak with the driver before enforcing with tickets.
    The initiative is being trialled in the Norwich North area first before being reviewed.
    However, a police spokeswoman stressed that general parking offences are the local council's responsibility and should be reported to them.
    If you’re in Norwich North and would like to report a parking obstruction, you can do so by emailing OpChatty@norfolk.police.uk

    What does the law say?

    "Don't ride a chav-bike on the FOOTway"?

    While large parts of parking enforcement is now covered by councils, obstruction of pavements is still covered by the police.
    The Highways Act 1980 says: "If a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks or a fine or both."
    Since 2011, Enforcement of on-street parking restrictions, including yellow lines and time-limited spaces, is now carried out by civil enforcement officers managed by local councils.
    Officers also have the power to issue fines.

    They don't.

    But May Sun's vocabulary is limited. He can't spell "penalty notice". Or pronounce it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)