On 15/02/2024 14:35, Simon Mason wrote:
QUOTE: Similarly CLAIMS SOLUTION GROUP LIMITED of Dunkeld Street, Aberfeldy, Perth & Kinross was also sentenced in the driver's absence at court to a £1000 fine and ordered to pay £400 Victim Surcharge and £110 costs. The company did not respond and
so failed to give Warwickshire Police information relating to the identity of the driver of their BMW X6 car who was caught allegedly speeding on 5 July 2023 in Rugby. As they did not respond, no plea was entered and the company was found guilty in their
absence. ENDS
£1500 for playing silly buggers?
More money than sense with these morons.
£1500?
Cheap at the price if it means no licence endorsement and no increased
risk of a totting-up disqualification for a partner or a valued employee (valued a bit more then the charlady, as worthy as she may be, and
certainly more than the night shift floor swabber).
Tell you what: if "offenders" admitting breaches of purely
adminsitrative offences were given a choice of a £1500 cash penalty or a disqualification, many - if not the vast majority - would certainly
choose the former rather than the latter.
The line length on your posts is becoming ridiculous. Suits you, really.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)