• road.cc article with no sense of irony

    From Spike@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 30 08:14:24 2024
    MPs should be punished for spreading disinformation, think tank says, after “crackpot conspiracy theory” prompted government to slash active travel funding in “dangerous dereliction of responsibility”

    The Demos report also found that a “democratic chasm” and lack of information has pushed people towards toxic social media debate on issues
    such as low traffic neighbourhoods
    by RYAN MALLON
    MON, MAY 27, 2024 21:16

    Politicians should be punished for spreading and amplifying disinformation about active travel schemes, the think tank Demos has recommended, as part
    of a report exploring the implementation of low traffic neighbourhoods
    (LTNs) across the UK in recent years and the “explosion” of conspiracy theories – particularly surrounding 15-minute cities – that accompanied this policy.

    According to the cross-party think thank, the Conservative government’s
    move last year to disown its previous active travel policies – as part of prime minister Rishi Sunak’s so-called ‘plan for drivers’ – and “actively
    attack” councils introducing such measures represented a “dangerous dereliction of its responsibility”, leaving a “wide open goal” for the conspiratorial narratives that subsequently flourished.

    [linked article] “Crackpot conspiracy theory” led to government slashing active travel funding

    In January, it emerged that a “crackpot conspiracy theory” that misrepresents the urban planning concept of the 15-minute city led to the government slashing funding for active travel and pledging to review
    measures aimed at curbing the use of private motor vehicles.

    Documents obtained by the Transport Action Network (TAN), as part of its
    legal challenge to the swingeing active travel cuts imposed by Chancellor
    of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt last year, revealed that conspiracy theories
    were at least partly responsible for the change in tack by the government, which saw Sunak pledge to review low traffic neighbourhoods and the rollout
    of 20mph speed limits, among other things.

    In September, transport secretary Mark Harper repeated and endorsed a well-known and completely false conspiracy theory surrounding 15-minute
    cities, telling a Conservative Party Conference fringe meeting that the “Labour-backed” urban planning policy meant that “local councils can decide
    how often you go to the shops” and would “remove your freedom to get from A to B how you want”.

    [linked article] Why is the 15-minute city attracting so many conspiracy theories?

    And a new report by cross-party think thank Demos, in collaboration with
    the Public Interest News Foundation, has recommended that the Committee for Standards in Public Life and the Labour Party’s new independent Ethics and Integrity Commission should incorporate into their ongoing reviews the “way in which politicians behave in relation to disinformation narratives
    online” such as those repeated by the likes of Harper recently.

    Demos’ report, titled ‘Driving Disinformation: Democratic deficits, disinformation and low traffic neighbourhoods – a portrait of policy failure’ (link is external), concluded that the commissions should “specifically recommend how politicians educate themselves on such
    narratives and evaluate the extent to which such narratives weaken relationships with democratic institutions and the rule of law, before amplifying them via online platforms for their own political gain”.

    Any politician guilty of such behaviour, Demos argues, should be punished, creating a “greater incentive to thoroughly investigate certain narratives before promoting them at scale”.

    The report was based on a combination of digital media analysis of over
    570,000 social media posts and face-to-face engagement with 47 residents
    and 24 interviews with local journalists, community leaders, activists, and politicians in three areas were LTNs were introduced: Oxford, Enfield, and Rochdale.

    [linked article] “Going back is not realistic”: Councillor stresses “need to change” as Oxford LTNs made permanent – but angry residents say “we can’t get on bikes”

    The report found that levels of LTN-related disinformation online “exploded” between 2022 and 2023. Between 2020 and 2022, social media posts on the schemes were evenly split between positive and negative, a trend
    that skewed dramatically in 2023, when 79 per cent of the most engaged-with posts were strongly anti-LTN.

    Demos also concluded that disinformation has been allowed to flourish in
    the “democratic chasm” that exists and is widening, they say, at local level between councils and communities.

    This is due, Demos says, to the failure of local authorities to provide
    their residents with sufficient information on active travel measures, as
    well as the demise of local newspapers and other media capable of
    facilitating reasonable debate on the matter, creating a vacuum which has pushed people towards social media and its increasingly toxic, polarising landscape.

    [linked article] Government tried to bury report which found that Low
    Traffic Neighbourhoods are effective and popular

    On a national level, meanwhile, Demos concluded that the implementation of
    LTNs across the UK since 2020 was “beset by ambiguity at the top of government that trickled down through the local rollout resulting in significant variation, confusion, and disruption to its impact”.

    The report continued: “The government’s move in late 2023 to explicitly disown the policy it had funded and then actively attack councils for how
    they implemented it represents a dangerous dereliction of its
    responsibility.

    “The impact of this decision, together with the language used by
    politicians, left the information environment a wide open goal for the conspiratorial narratives that flourished.”

    [linked article] How to save a low-traffic neighbourhood: Overcoming
    hecklers, "dodgy" data, and political intrigue as councillors prevent early scrapping of active streets trial

    “An instruction to act ‘swiftly’, combined with historic funding constraints, led to serious shortcomings in the way the councils engaged citizens in LTN implementation,” Hannah Perry, Demos’ lead researcher on social media, said after the report’s publication.

    “However, instead of working to bring a sense of calm, the government performed a screeching U-turn, in both policy and rhetoric, and ultimately
    fed the public backlash. Our analysis shows how this pivot coincided with
    the spike in LTN-related disinformation.

    “It is absolutely essential that lessons are learned and that we radically transform how democracy takes place locally. There is a worsening
    democratic chasm between councils and communities. We are calling for a new layer of participation so that our local politicians can foster
    constructive relationships with citizens, working in partnership with them,
    not against them.”

    <https://road.cc/content/news/mps-should-be-punished-spreading-disinformation-308549>

    The comments are hilarious.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Spike on Thu May 30 14:45:50 2024
    On 30/05/2024 09:14 am, Spike wrote:

    MPs should be punished for spreading disinformation, think tank says, after “crackpot conspiracy theory” prompted government to slash active travel funding in “dangerous dereliction of responsibility”

    The Demos report also found that a “democratic chasm” and lack of information has pushed people towards toxic social media debate on issues such as low traffic neighbourhoods
    by RYAN MALLON
    MON, MAY 27, 2024 21:16

    Politicians should be punished for spreading and amplifying disinformation about active travel schemes, the think tank Demos has recommended, as part
    of a report exploring the implementation of low traffic neighbourhoods
    (LTNs) across the UK in recent years and the “explosion” of conspiracy theories – particularly surrounding 15-minute cities – that accompanied this policy.

    Who is the "chairperson" of Demos? Is it Gaius "Caligula" Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus?

    It sounds like the sort of thing he'd have said.

    According to the cross-party think thank, the Conservative government’s move last year to disown its previous active travel policies – as part of prime minister Rishi Sunak’s so-called ‘plan for drivers’ – and “actively
    attack” councils introducing such measures represented a “dangerous dereliction of its responsibility”, leaving a “wide open goal” for the conspiratorial narratives that subsequently flourished.

    [linked article] “Crackpot conspiracy theory” led to government slashing active travel funding

    How about opposition from ordinary members of the public - in fact
    members of the majority of the public - having been AT LAST taken into
    account and their views and requirements weighed more heavily than those
    of chav-cyclists and their fellow travellers?

    In January, it emerged that a “crackpot conspiracy theory” that misrepresents the urban planning concept of the 15-minute city led to the government slashing funding for active travel and pledging to review
    measures aimed at curbing the use of private motor vehicles.

    Documents obtained by the Transport Action Network (TAN), as part of its legal challenge to the swingeing active travel cuts imposed by Chancellor
    of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt last year, revealed that conspiracy theories were at least partly responsible for the change in tack by the government, which saw Sunak pledge to review low traffic neighbourhoods and the rollout of 20mph speed limits, among other things.

    In September, transport secretary Mark Harper repeated and endorsed a well-known and completely false conspiracy theory surrounding 15-minute cities, telling a Conservative Party Conference fringe meeting that the “Labour-backed” urban planning policy meant that “local councils can decide
    how often you go to the shops” and would “remove your freedom to get from A
    to B how you want”.

    Isn't...

    ...“[removing] your freedom to get from A to B how you want”...

    ...a perfectly fair accurate description of the transport and highways
    policy of far too many local authorities?

    If it were not the case, why has so much sabotage of the highway network
    taken place and in many cases, is ongoing?

    [linked article] Why is the 15-minute city attracting so many conspiracy theories?

    Pace the use of the word "conspiracy" (which itself is hardly unfair
    when one thinks of the secretive and deceitful way in which the sabotage
    is usually planned*), one would *expect* a negative reaction to
    reductions in liberty.

    Is it the victims' duty to rejoice in his disadvantage and congratulate
    the perpetrators?

    [* Remember how so many "LTNs" were installed during lockdown, with
    councils all over the country hoping that no-one would notice because
    there was so little traffic? Was that all a coincidence, or was it co-ordinated?

    And a new report by cross-party think thank Demos, in collaboration with
    the Public Interest News Foundation, has recommended that the Committee for Standards in Public Life and the Labour Party’s new independent Ethics and Integrity Commission should incorporate into their ongoing reviews the “way in which politicians behave in relation to disinformation narratives online” such as those repeated by the likes of Harper recently.

    Demos’ report, titled ‘Driving Disinformation: Democratic deficits, disinformation and low traffic neighbourhoods – a portrait of policy failure’ (link is external), concluded that the commissions should “specifically recommend how politicians educate themselves on such narratives and evaluate the extent to which such narratives weaken relationships with democratic institutions and the rule of law, before amplifying them via online platforms for their own political gain”.

    Any politician guilty of such behaviour, Demos argues, should be punished, creating a “greater incentive to thoroughly investigate certain narratives before promoting them at scale”.

    Thank you for your views, Emperor Caligula.

    The report was based on a combination of digital media analysis of over 570,000 social media posts and face-to-face engagement with 47 residents
    and 24 interviews with local journalists, community leaders, activists, and politicians in three areas were LTNs were introduced: Oxford, Enfield, and Rochdale.

    [linked article] “Going back is not realistic”: Councillor stresses “need
    to change” as Oxford LTNs made permanent – but angry residents say “we can’t get on bikes”

    The report found that levels of LTN-related disinformation online “exploded” between 2022 and 2023. Between 2020 and 2022, social media posts
    on the schemes were evenly split between positive and negative, a trend
    that skewed dramatically in 2023, when 79 per cent of the most engaged-with posts were strongly anti-LTN.

    Demos also concluded that disinformation has been allowed to flourish in
    the “democratic chasm” that exists and is widening, they say, at local level between councils and communities.

    This is due, Demos says, to the failure of local authorities to provide
    their residents with sufficient information on active travel measures, as well as the demise of local newspapers and other media capable of facilitating reasonable debate on the matter, creating a vacuum which has pushed people towards social media and its increasingly toxic, polarising landscape.

    [linked article] Government tried to bury report which found that Low
    Traffic Neighbourhoods are effective and popular

    On a national level, meanwhile, Demos concluded that the implementation of LTNs across the UK since 2020 was “beset by ambiguity at the top of government that trickled down through the local rollout resulting in significant variation, confusion, and disruption to its impact”.

    The report continued: “The government’s move in late 2023 to explicitly disown the policy it had funded and then actively attack councils for how they implemented it represents a dangerous dereliction of its
    responsibility.

    “The impact of this decision, together with the language used by politicians, left the information environment a wide open goal for the conspiratorial narratives that flourished.”

    [linked article] How to save a low-traffic neighbourhood: Overcoming hecklers, "dodgy" data, and political intrigue as councillors prevent early scrapping of active streets trial

    “An instruction to act ‘swiftly’, combined with historic funding constraints, led to serious shortcomings in the way the councils engaged citizens in LTN implementation,” Hannah Perry, Demos’ lead researcher on social media, said after the report’s publication.

    “However, instead of working to bring a sense of calm, the government performed a screeching U-turn, in both policy and rhetoric, and ultimately fed the public backlash. Our analysis shows how this pivot coincided with
    the spike in LTN-related disinformation.

    “It is absolutely essential that lessons are learned and that we radically transform how democracy takes place locally. There is a worsening
    democratic chasm between councils and communities. We are calling for a new layer of participation so that our local politicians can foster
    constructive relationships with citizens, working in partnership with them, not against them.”

    <https://road.cc/content/news/mps-should-be-punished-spreading-disinformation-308549>

    The comments are hilarious.

    I can imagine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)