• Re: For those who believe in electricity

    From bp@www.zefox.net@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Mon Apr 7 03:59:05 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    It’s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply short out the switch, but it’s very difficult to identify and reach its microscopic solder pads and I’m no good at micro soldering. I think my best bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing and cutting
    it as necessary, hoping that it will yield access to solder points that
    I can bridge with a short. If that cures it, fine. And I’ll probably buy that other light anyway.


    If the switch used to click and now doesn't, it's likely bad. I'd
    be somewhat surprised if the illustrated switches were able to click
    at all, they seem mighty small. They also look well-sealed.

    With ohmmeter probes across the switch contacts it should either be
    zero (closed) or something else (rest of circuit) when open. If it's
    not zero, I'd agree either the switch is faulty or you've got a bad
    connection in your test leads. Jumpy readings are always suspect.

    A close inspection with a magnifier might reveal unsound solder joints.
    It might be possible to reflow at least those that look dewetted or
    lean. Long shot, but I've fixed one or two gadgets that way. In the
    second photo the solder joints either side of SW2 look less than ideal.

    Good luck,

    bob prohaska

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Mon Apr 7 11:16:02 2025
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    I'm not an electronics guy. But speaking of problems, I think I
    mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night ride, my headlight (B&M
    Eyc N plus),  powered by my good old sidewall generator, was randomly
    and sporadically blinking off. I put the bike on the workstand, checked
    out the wiring (it’s original and pristine), and spent some time
    spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight worked, sometimes not,
    and it changed state at random without having been touched. I was
    suspicious of the tiny on/off switch hidden behind a rubber plug, in
    part because I felt no satisfying click.

    I substituted a different (lower quality) LED dynamo light, which seemed
    to work perfectly and probably absolved the generator. I eventually
    talked by phone to Peter White, who sold me the light far longer ago
    than I remembered - ten years! I asked if he had clues on diagnosing the problem. He did not, but suggested that the identical light without the possible failure point of an  on/off switch is just $35. (A sidewall
    dyno doesn't need a switch.) Still, I opted to open the light to see if
    I could spot anything because I have a compulsion about fixing things -
    but a headlight has to be really, really reliable.

    Here are photos of the electronic guts, with a vernier caliper for size
    (and to educate Tom!).

    Bottom view. The downward facing LED is at the top of the photo, the suspicious switch is the tiny white box at the photo’s bottom. https:// www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/

    Top of the circuit board. The large copper pad is part of the heat sink system, contacting a metal casting that forms the top of the headlamp
    body. I’ll probably add some heat conducting goop when I reassemble: https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/dateposted-
    public/

    Although a bike generator or dynamo puts out AC, I had hoped to diagnose
    it using DC, figuring a 6 volt battery would essentially supply half of
    the sine wave so half of the input circuit. That naturally works with incandescents, and it worked with one Avenir LED dyno headlight that I repaired. Not so in this case. So I ran another generator using a roller chucked in my drill press, attached a digital voltmeter in parallel, and poked around best I could. I saw nothing loose, no scorched components, nothing obviously wrong.

    With no power attached, I tried checking for continuity across the
    switch. It always showed close to zero ohms, never infinity - but the resistance readings with pinpoint probes were jumpy, and since the
    switch wasn’t isolated from the circuit, that may not mean much.

    I used contact cleaner to blast out the switch and repeatedly clicked
    it, including while power was applied. Except for a few occasions, the
    light did not respond to the switch, so I still suspect the switch. When
    the light was off, I had about 12 VDC. When on, about 4 VDC.

    It’s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply short out the switch, but it’s very difficult to identify and reach its microscopic solder pads and I’m no good at micro soldering.  I think my best bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing and cutting
    it as necessary, hoping that it will yield access to solder points that
    I can bridge with a short. If that cures it, fine. And I’ll probably buy that other light anyway.

    BTW, Peter White is not pleased about the tariff situation. He says he won’t raise prices on current stock, but with the next shipment he’ll probably have to.


    One possibility is open/"cold" solder connection somewhere. These
    assemblies are built with what is known as a 'reflow' soldering process
    - essentially, the PCB has a solder paste applied through a process
    similar to silk-screen, then the parts a put on the board using a "pick
    and place" machine, then it's run through a hot oven which melts the
    solder paste and hopefully wets the solder to both the component and the
    pad under it.

    Sometimes, it doesn't quite flow right and ends up with a "cold"
    connection. The connection may work for some time, over time will
    oxidize such that it opens the connection. Normal cleaning techniques
    seldom work to fix this, it usually takes reheating the offending
    connection to reflow the solder, and some type of flux is highly
    recommended.

    One way to diagnose this is to apply power to the circuit and press on
    the components, though this sometimes doesn't work either. If it does, a
    light touch with a soldering iron and on the component connections
    _usually_ works.

    Someone with good understanding of soldering techniques might be able to
    see a cold solder joint under a microscope (10X usually suffices).

    I recently bought a new blinky light for my commuter and the switch was intermittent out of the box. A cold solder joint on the switch contacts
    was the culprit.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Zen Cycle on Mon Apr 7 10:36:11 2025
    On 4/7/2025 10:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    I'm not an electronics guy. But speaking of problems, I
    think I mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night
    ride, my headlight (B&M Eyc N plus),  powered by my good
    old sidewall generator, was randomly and sporadically
    blinking off. I put the bike on the workstand, checked out
    the wiring (it’s original and pristine), and spent some
    time spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight
    worked, sometimes not, and it changed state at random
    without having been touched. I was suspicious of the tiny
    on/off switch hidden behind a rubber plug, in part because
    I felt no satisfying click.

    I substituted a different (lower quality) LED dynamo
    light, which seemed to work perfectly and probably
    absolved the generator. I eventually talked by phone to
    Peter White, who sold me the light far longer ago than I
    remembered - ten years! I asked if he had clues on
    diagnosing the problem. He did not, but suggested that the
    identical light without the possible failure point of an
    on/off switch is just $35. (A sidewall dyno doesn't need a
    switch.) Still, I opted to open the light to see if I
    could spot anything because I have a compulsion about
    fixing things - but a headlight has to be really, really
    reliable.

    Here are photos of the electronic guts, with a vernier
    caliper for size (and to educate Tom!).

    Bottom view. The downward facing LED is at the top of the
    photo, the suspicious switch is the tiny white box at the
    photo’s bottom. https:// www.flickr.com/
    photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/

    Top of the circuit board. The large copper pad is part of
    the heat sink system, contacting a metal casting that
    forms the top of the headlamp body. I’ll probably add some
    heat conducting goop when I reassemble:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/
    dateposted- public/

    Although a bike generator or dynamo puts out AC, I had
    hoped to diagnose it using DC, figuring a 6 volt battery
    would essentially supply half of the sine wave so half of
    the input circuit. That naturally works with
    incandescents, and it worked with one Avenir LED dyno
    headlight that I repaired. Not so in this case. So I ran
    another generator using a roller chucked in my drill
    press, attached a digital voltmeter in parallel, and poked
    around best I could. I saw nothing loose, no scorched
    components, nothing obviously wrong.

    With no power attached, I tried checking for continuity
    across the switch. It always showed close to zero ohms,
    never infinity - but the resistance readings with pinpoint
    probes were jumpy, and since the switch wasn’t isolated
    from the circuit, that may not mean much.

    I used contact cleaner to blast out the switch and
    repeatedly clicked it, including while power was applied.
    Except for a few occasions, the light did not respond to
    the switch, so I still suspect the switch. When the light
    was off, I had about 12 VDC. When on, about 4 VDC.

    It’s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would
    try to simply short out the switch, but it’s very
    difficult to identify and reach its microscopic solder
    pads and I’m no good at micro soldering.  I think my best
    bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing
    and cutting it as necessary, hoping that it will yield
    access to solder points that I can bridge with a short. If
    that cures it, fine. And I’ll probably buy that other
    light anyway.

    BTW, Peter White is not pleased about the tariff
    situation. He says he won’t raise prices on current stock,
    but with the next shipment he’ll probably have to.


    One possibility is open/"cold" solder connection somewhere.
    These assemblies are built with what is known as a 'reflow'
    soldering process - essentially, the PCB has a solder paste
    applied through a process similar to silk-screen, then the
    parts a put on the board using a "pick and place" machine,
    then it's run through a hot oven which melts the solder
    paste and hopefully wets the solder to both the component
    and the pad under it.

    Sometimes, it doesn't quite flow right and ends up with a
    "cold" connection. The connection may work for some time,
    over time will oxidize such that it opens the connection.
    Normal cleaning techniques seldom work to fix this, it
    usually takes reheating the offending connection to reflow
    the solder, and some type of flux is highly recommended.

    One way to diagnose this is to apply power to the circuit
    and press on the components, though this sometimes doesn't
    work either. If it does, a light touch with a soldering iron
    and on the component connections _usually_ works.

    Someone with good understanding of soldering techniques
    might be able to see a cold solder joint under a microscope
    (10X usually suffices).

    I recently bought a new blinky light for my commuter and the
    switch was intermittent out of the box. A cold solder joint
    on the switch contacts was the culprit.


    I did exactly that (reflow poor solder joints) for a control
    on the board of our shop truck's radio last autumn. For Mr
    Krygowski's problem, the scale is dauntingly smaller. I am
    no expert but it looks difficult to me.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Zen Cycle on Mon Apr 7 08:56:02 2025
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there are
    ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash mode.
    It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode, and it's
    powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful light of course.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bp@www.zefox.net@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Mon Apr 7 16:04:33 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    I did exactly that (reflow poor solder joints) for a control
    on the board of our shop truck's radio last autumn. For Mr
    Krygowski's problem, the scale is dauntingly smaller. I am
    no expert but it looks difficult to me.

    Indeed, for us old folks 8-)

    There's an instructive YouTube channel called "northridgefix" which
    illustrates modern methods.

    But, with a pointy iron and good flux it's worth a try. Especially
    when, as in this case, there's nothing to lose.

    bob prohaska

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to sms on Mon Apr 7 12:08:05 2025
    On 4/7/2025 11:56 AM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there are
    ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash mode.
    It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode, and it's
    powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful light of course.


    A rectified AC wave form would work as long as the voltage is within
    spec of the LED. Pulsatile waveforms are exceeding common in LED driver systems. It's usually driven by a PWM for the intensity control for
    lighting and through a shift register for a matrix intended for
    information.

    It isn't wasteful, it's actually more efficient to drive with a lower
    duty cycle than straight DC.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to bp@www.zefox.net on Mon Apr 7 11:12:37 2025
    On 4/7/2025 11:04 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    I did exactly that (reflow poor solder joints) for a control
    on the board of our shop truck's radio last autumn. For Mr
    Krygowski's problem, the scale is dauntingly smaller. I am
    no expert but it looks difficult to me.

    Indeed, for us old folks 8-)

    There's an instructive YouTube channel called "northridgefix" which illustrates modern methods.

    But, with a pointy iron and good flux it's worth a try. Especially
    when, as in this case, there's nothing to lose.

    bob prohaska


    +1 to both 'nothing to lose' and to crappy vision in my age
    group.

    I used a nail and a propane canister. Tinned the nail and
    then heated it before flowing each side of the switch.


    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Zen Cycle on Mon Apr 7 09:14:32 2025
    On 4/7/2025 9:08 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 11:56 AM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there
    are ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash mode.
    It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode, and it's
    powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful light of course.


    A rectified AC wave form would work as long as the voltage is within
    spec of the LED. Pulsatile waveforms are exceeding common in LED driver systems. It's usually driven by a PWM for the intensity control for
    lighting and through a shift register for a matrix intended for
    information.

    It isn't wasteful, it's actually more efficient to drive with a lower
    duty cycle than straight DC.

    Correct that rectified AC would work but Frank was not using rectified
    AC, he was using DC.

    PWM DC is very different than AC. With pure AC, the LED would be
    conducting during only half the cycle. With AC, it's done like this with
    two LEDs <https://www.heathcote-electronics.co.uk/images-leds/two-leds-wired-to-AC-power-supply.jpg>.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Mon Apr 7 12:17:17 2025
    On 4/7/2025 12:10 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Apr 6 22:22:33 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    I'm not an electronics guy. But speaking of problems, I think I
    mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night ride, my headlight (B&M
    Eyc N plus), powered by my good old sidewall generator, was randomly
    and sporadically blinking off. I put the bike on the workstand, checked
    out the wiring (it?s original and pristine), and spent some time
    spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight worked, sometimes not,
    and it changed state at random without having been touched. I was
    suspicious of the tiny on/off switch hidden behind a rubber plug, in
    part because I felt no satisfying click.

    I substituted a different (lower quality) LED dynamo light, which seemed
    to work perfectly and probably absolved the generator. I eventually
    talked by phone to Peter White, who sold me the light far longer ago
    than I remembered - ten years! I asked if he had clues on diagnosing the
    problem. He did not, but suggested that the identical light without the
    possible failure point of an on/off switch is just $35. (A sidewall
    dyno doesn't need a switch.) Still, I opted to open the light to see if
    I could spot anything because I have a compulsion about fixing things -
    but a headlight has to be really, really reliable.

    Here are photos of the electronic guts, with a vernier caliper for size
    (and to educate Tom!).

    Bottom view. The downward facing LED is at the top of the photo, the
    suspicious switch is the tiny white box at the photo?s bottom.
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/ >>
    Top of the circuit board. The large copper pad is part of the heat sink
    system, contacting a metal casting that forms the top of the headlamp
    body. I?ll probably add some heat conducting goop when I reassemble:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/dateposted-public/ >>
    Although a bike generator or dynamo puts out AC, I had hoped to diagnose
    it using DC, figuring a 6 volt battery would essentially supply half of
    the sine wave so half of the input circuit. That naturally works with
    incandescents, and it worked with one Avenir LED dyno headlight that I
    repaired. Not so in this case. So I ran another generator using a roller
    chucked in my drill press, attached a digital voltmeter in parallel, and
    poked around best I could. I saw nothing loose, no scorched components,
    nothing obviously wrong.

    With no power attached, I tried checking for continuity across the
    switch. It always showed close to zero ohms, never infinity - but the
    resistance readings with pinpoint probes were jumpy, and since the
    switch wasn?t isolated from the circuit, that may not mean much.

    I used contact cleaner to blast out the switch and repeatedly clicked
    it, including while power was applied. Except for a few occasions, the
    light did not respond to the switch, so I still suspect the switch. When
    the light was off, I had about 12 VDC. When on, about 4 VDC.

    It?s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply
    short out the switch, but it?s very difficult to identify and reach its
    microscopic solder pads and I?m no good at micro soldering. I think my
    best bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing and cutting
    it as necessary, hoping that it will yield access to solder points that
    I can bridge with a short. If that cures it, fine. And I?ll probably buy
    that other light anyway.

    BTW, Peter White is not pleased about the tariff situation. He says he
    won?t raise prices on current stock, but with the next shipment he?ll
    probably have to.




    What is the purpose of holding that PC board in a caliper?

    He stated it in his message.

    Was the size of the board in question?

    Wow...You don't know how to read a caliper?

    Tell us the function of the PC board

    He did

    and the likely source of your blinking problem?

    He speculated, not being an EE or Elec Tech.

    Frank, you were an instructor, you do not have any practical knowledge of anything.

    did you actually bother to read any of this before posting?
    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to sms on Mon Apr 7 12:28:26 2025
    On 4/7/2025 12:14 PM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 9:08 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 11:56 AM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there
    are ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful
    as it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash
    mode. It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode,
    and it's powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful
    light of course.


    A rectified AC wave form would work as long as the voltage is within
    spec of the LED. Pulsatile waveforms are exceeding common in LED
    driver systems. It's usually driven by a PWM for the intensity control
    for lighting and through a shift register for a matrix intended for
    information.

    It isn't wasteful, it's actually more efficient to drive with a lower
    duty cycle than straight DC.

    Correct that rectified AC would work but Frank was not using rectified
    AC, he was using DC.

    I know, I was just saying...


    PWM DC is very different than AC.

    "PWM DC"? PWM by definition isn't DC. PWM generators even at maximum
    drive aren't 100% duty cycle (yes, effectively DC considering the
    response of the LED, but still not exactly DC).

    With pure AC, the LED would be
    conducting during only half the cycle.

    That's not necessarily a problem, as long as the amplitude of the AC
    signal crosses the minimum voltage threshold but doesn't exceed the
    maximum, and as long as the frequency is above ~ 100 Hz most people
    don't see the flicker (though it can be annoying in poorly designed systems https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-scientific-reason-you-dont-like-led-bulbs-mdash-and-the-simple-way-to-fix-them/)

    With AC, it's done like this with
    two LEDs <https://www.heathcote-electronics.co.uk/images-leds/two-leds- wired-to-AC-power-supply.jpg>.
    Yup, that's one way to do it.


    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to bp@www.zefox.net on Mon Apr 7 16:30:41 2025
    On Mon Apr 7 03:59:05 2025 bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    It?s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply short out the switch, but it?s very difficult to identify and reach its microscopic solder pads and I?m no good at micro soldering. I think my best bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing and cutting
    it as necessary, hoping that it will yield access to solder points that
    I can bridge with a short. If that cures it, fine. And I?ll probably buy that other light anyway.


    If the switch used to click and now doesn't, it's likely bad. I'd
    be somewhat surprised if the illustrated switches were able to click
    at all, they seem mighty small. They also look well-sealed.

    With ohmmeter probes across the switch contacts it should either be
    zero (closed) or something else (rest of circuit) when open. If it's
    not zero, I'd agree either the switch is faulty or you've got a bad connection in your test leads. Jumpy readings are always suspect.

    A close inspection with a magnifier might reveal unsound solder joints.
    It might be possible to reflow at least those that look dewetted or
    lean. Long shot, but I've fixed one or two gadgets that way. In the
    second photo the solder joints either side of SW2 look less than ideal.




    Bob, that is an AC-DC converter and voltage regulator. It is likely that the switch has been left in the on position forever, is stuck in that position from deposits and should not be tampered with other than to measure that it isnt't internally corroded
    by measuring continuity while vibrating or shocking the board by knocking it against a surface. The converter is nothing more than an coil and capacitor. It appears to use a 16 volt regulator but that seems an unlikely voltage considering most of the
    incandesents I've seen are 8 volts. But simple measurement would answer that problem. Frank's LED test is worthless other than to prove that the switch is on since LED's are unidirectional and if the output of the generator is of high enough frequecy he
    would observe a blinking. Coils do not fail and modern capacitors rarely do, which could put the problem with the regulator circuits. Usually such failures are traceablke to the incandesent socket.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Mon Apr 7 12:40:47 2025
    On 4/7/2025 12:35 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Apr 7 12:17:17 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 12:10 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Apr 6 22:22:33 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    I'm not an electronics guy. But speaking of problems, I think I
    mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night ride, my headlight (B&M >>>> Eyc N plus), powered by my good old sidewall generator, was randomly
    and sporadically blinking off. I put the bike on the workstand, checked >>>> out the wiring (it?s original and pristine), and spent some time
    spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight worked, sometimes not, >>>> and it changed state at random without having been touched. I was
    suspicious of the tiny on/off switch hidden behind a rubber plug, in
    part because I felt no satisfying click.

    I substituted a different (lower quality) LED dynamo light, which seemed >>>> to work perfectly and probably absolved the generator. I eventually
    talked by phone to Peter White, who sold me the light far longer ago
    than I remembered - ten years! I asked if he had clues on diagnosing the >>>> problem. He did not, but suggested that the identical light without the >>>> possible failure point of an on/off switch is just $35. (A sidewall
    dyno doesn't need a switch.) Still, I opted to open the light to see if >>>> I could spot anything because I have a compulsion about fixing things - >>>> but a headlight has to be really, really reliable.

    Here are photos of the electronic guts, with a vernier caliper for size >>>> (and to educate Tom!).

    Bottom view. The downward facing LED is at the top of the photo, the
    suspicious switch is the tiny white box at the photo?s bottom.
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/

    Top of the circuit board. The large copper pad is part of the heat sink >>>> system, contacting a metal casting that forms the top of the headlamp
    body. I?ll probably add some heat conducting goop when I reassemble:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/dateposted-public/

    Although a bike generator or dynamo puts out AC, I had hoped to diagnose >>>> it using DC, figuring a 6 volt battery would essentially supply half of >>>> the sine wave so half of the input circuit. That naturally works with
    incandescents, and it worked with one Avenir LED dyno headlight that I >>>> repaired. Not so in this case. So I ran another generator using a roller >>>> chucked in my drill press, attached a digital voltmeter in parallel, and >>>> poked around best I could. I saw nothing loose, no scorched components, >>>> nothing obviously wrong.

    With no power attached, I tried checking for continuity across the
    switch. It always showed close to zero ohms, never infinity - but the
    resistance readings with pinpoint probes were jumpy, and since the
    switch wasn?t isolated from the circuit, that may not mean much.

    I used contact cleaner to blast out the switch and repeatedly clicked
    it, including while power was applied. Except for a few occasions, the >>>> light did not respond to the switch, so I still suspect the switch. When >>>> the light was off, I had about 12 VDC. When on, about 4 VDC.

    It?s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply >>>> short out the switch, but it?s very difficult to identify and reach its >>>> microscopic solder pads and I?m no good at micro soldering. I think my >>>> best bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing and cutting >>>> it as necessary, hoping that it will yield access to solder points that >>>> I can bridge with a short. If that cures it, fine. And I?ll probably buy >>>> that other light anyway.

    BTW, Peter White is not pleased about the tariff situation. He says he >>>> won?t raise prices on current stock, but with the next shipment he?ll
    probably have to.




    What is the purpose of holding that PC board in a caliper?

    He stated it in his message.

    Was the size of the board in question?

    Wow...You don't know how to read a caliper?

    Tell us the function of the PC board

    He did

    and the likely source of your blinking problem?

    He speculated, not being an EE or Elec Tech.

    Frank, you were an instructor, you do not have any practical knowledge of anything.

    did you actually bother to read any of this before posting?




    Why do you have to show you're a blithering idiot all of the time? Gemeral knowledge gained by someone else telling him doesn't mean he knows what he ius looking at or understands possible problem areas. And it is plain that neither do you.

    lol...keep flailing sparky....


    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 17:01:57 2025
    On Mon Apr 7 08:56:02 2025 sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there are
    ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash mode.
    It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode, and it's
    powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful light of course.




    Stop trying to explain things to someone who doesn't have the concepts. The Problem wikth simply using two reversed LED's is that dynamos increase their ACV with speed. if you simply cut the tops off of the waves if they havemore than the forwaed bias
    most of the time. But that throws away a lot of energy. And the chopper would have to be able to get rid of a lot of heat. I can think of some nice ways to increase performance but Frank is in no position to design PC boards. And Flunky thinks that wave
    sooldering leaves voids so he is so far out of it that it proves my previous impressions.

    One of the reasons I was worth so much money was because I knew every step of manufacturing and could not only design and progam but analyze every procedure from assembly to end product and even packaging and shipping.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Mon Apr 7 13:09:45 2025
    On 4/7/2025 1:01 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Apr 7 08:56:02 2025 sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there are
    ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash mode.
    It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode, and it's
    powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful light of course.




    Stop trying to explain things to someone who doesn't have the concepts. The Problem wikth simply using two reversed LED's is that dynamos increase their ACV with speed. if you simply cut the tops off of the waves if they havemore than the forwaed bias
    most of the time. But that throws away a lot of energy. And the chopper would have to be able to get rid of a lot of heat. I can think of some nice ways to increase performance but Frank is in no position to design PC boards. And Flunky thinks that wave
    sooldering leaves voids so he is so far out of it that it proves my previous impressions.

    And, As usual....
    https://www.mclpcb.com/blog/solder-joint/

    And yes, that article is about voids in surface mount reflow systems.

    Besides that, you dumbass, I didn't mention voids. I mentioned cold
    solder - different than a void. That you obviously don't know the
    difference speaks even more to your overall ineptitude.


    One of the reasons I was worth so much money was because I knew every step of manufacturing and could not only design and progam but analyze every procedure from assembly to end product and even packaging and shipping.

    And yet you never had to deal with the FDA when designing medical equipment....lol





    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 17:28:47 2025
    On Mon Apr 7 09:14:32 2025 sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 9:08 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 11:56 AM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there
    are ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash mode.
    It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode, and it's
    powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful light of course. >>

    A rectified AC wave form would work as long as the voltage is within
    spec of the LED. Pulsatile waveforms are exceeding common in LED driver systems. It's usually driven by a PWM for the intensity control for lighting and through a shift register for a matrix intended for information.

    It isn't wasteful, it's actually more efficient to drive with a lower
    duty cycle than straight DC.

    Correct that rectified AC would work but Frank was not using rectified
    AC, he was using DC.

    PWM DC is very different than AC. With pure AC, the LED would be
    conducting during only half the cycle. With AC, it's done like this with
    two LEDs <https://www.heathcote-electronics.co.uk/images-leds/two-leds-wired-to-AC-power-supply.jpg>.



    The board that Frank showed isn't PWM DC. Yes the DC voltate occurs somewhat in pulses but the entire idea behind an I-C circuit is to minimize these pulses if not eliminate them altogether. The I-C is tuned to alwaysa work within the hot zone of the
    dynamo.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Mon Apr 7 14:21:00 2025
    On 4/7/2025 1:40 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Apr 7 13:09:45 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 1:01 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Apr 7 08:56:02 2025 sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there are >>>> ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as >>>> it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    For an inexpensive LED light I wouldn't spend too much time trying to
    repair it. If it were a high-end, LED light then that would be a
    different story.

    I also have a cheap dynamo light on one bike, the Planet Bike Blaze
    dynamo, the only dynamo light that I'm aware of that has a flash mode. >>>> It has a switch that I never use, it's always on flash mode, and it's
    powered by a hub dynamo. At night I have a more powerful light of course. >>>



    Stop trying to explain things to someone who doesn't have the concepts. The Problem wikth simply using two reversed LED's is that dynamos increase their ACV with speed. if you simply cut the tops off of the waves if they havemore than the forwaed
    bias most of the time. But that throws away a lot of energy. And the chopper would have to be able to get rid of a lot of heat. I can think of some nice ways to increase performance but Frank is in no position to design PC boards. And Flunky thinks that
    wave sooldering leaves voids so he is so far out of it that it proves my previous impressions.

    And, As usual....
    https://www.mclpcb.com/blog/solder-joint/

    And yes, that article is about voids in surface mount reflow systems.

    Besides that, you dumbass, I didn't mention voids. I mentioned cold
    solder - different than a void. That you obviously don't know the
    difference speaks even more to your overall ineptitude.


    One of the reasons I was worth so much money was because I knew every step of manufacturing and could not only design and progam but analyze every procedure from assembly to end product and even packaging and shipping.

    And yet you never had to deal with the FDA when designing medical
    equipment....lol




    I never had to deal with the FDA because it wasn't necesary for a machine, not being a food or a drug.

    And as usual

    https://www.fda.gov/news-events/approvals-fda-regulated-products
    "Medical Devices
    Instruments or products used for treating or diagnosing disease (such as thermometers, artificial hearts, and home pregnancy test kits)"

    Also:
    https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/

    Title 21 - Food and Drugs
    Chapter I Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and
    Human Services 1 – 1299
    Subchapter H Medical Devices 800 – 898


    While heart regulators are required to meet FDA standards - lawyers delt with tyhat.

    Lawyers rarely get involved in regulatory issues unless there's an issue
    that can't be resolved between the design and regulatory principals. Any
    device (especially having to do with monitoring or controlling the
    heart) that the FDA approves must meet _design_ criteria. Lawyers don't
    do that, dumbass.


    But explain why a rectal thermometer - your favorite toy -

    only in your dreams

    would need FDA approval beyond the initial calibration of the production equipment?

    Which is more proof you were never involved in the design of any medical electronics.

    https://www.fda.gov/media/116573/download

    "The guidance applies to the design of medical devices as well as the
    design of the associated manufacturing processes. The guidance is
    applicable to new designs as well as modifications or improvements to
    existing device designs. The guidance discusses subjects in the order in
    which they appear in FDA's Quality System regulation and is
    cross-referenced to International Organization for Standards (ISO)
    9001:1994, Quality Systems Model for Quality Assurance in Design,
    Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing, and the ISO draft international standard ISO/DIS 13485, Quality Systems¾Medical Devices¾Particular Requirements for the Application of ISO 9001."




    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Mon Apr 7 14:58:49 2025
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    I'm not an electronics guy. But speaking of problems, I think I
    mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night ride, my headlight (B&M
    Eyc N plus),  powered by my good old sidewall generator, was randomly
    and sporadically blinking off. I put the bike on the workstand, checked
    out the wiring (it’s original and pristine), and spent some time
    spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight worked, sometimes not,
    and it changed state at random without having been touched. I was
    suspicious of the tiny on/off switch hidden behind a rubber plug, in
    part because I felt no satisfying click.

    I substituted a different (lower quality) LED dynamo light, which seemed
    to work perfectly and probably absolved the generator. I eventually
    talked by phone to Peter White, who sold me the light far longer ago
    than I remembered - ten years! I asked if he had clues on diagnosing the problem. He did not, but suggested that the identical light without the possible failure point of an  on/off switch is just $35. (A sidewall
    dyno doesn't need a switch.) Still, I opted to open the light to see if
    I could spot anything because I have a compulsion about fixing things -
    but a headlight has to be really, really reliable.

    Here are photos of the electronic guts, with a vernier caliper for size
    (and to educate Tom!).

    Bottom view. The downward facing LED is at the top of the photo, the suspicious switch is the tiny white box at the photo’s bottom. https:// www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/

    Top of the circuit board. The large copper pad is part of the heat sink system, contacting a metal casting that forms the top of the headlamp
    body. I’ll probably add some heat conducting goop when I reassemble: https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/dateposted-
    public/


    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read the numbers off the
    16 pin IC?

    Although a bike generator or dynamo puts out AC, I had hoped to diagnose
    it using DC, figuring a 6 volt battery would essentially supply half of
    the sine wave so half of the input circuit. That naturally works with incandescents, and it worked with one Avenir LED dyno headlight that I repaired. Not so in this case. So I ran another generator using a roller chucked in my drill press, attached a digital voltmeter in parallel, and poked around best I could. I saw nothing loose, no scorched components, nothing obviously wrong.

    With no power attached, I tried checking for continuity across the
    switch. It always showed close to zero ohms, never infinity - but the resistance readings with pinpoint probes were jumpy, and since the
    switch wasn’t isolated from the circuit, that may not mean much.

    I used contact cleaner to blast out the switch and repeatedly clicked
    it, including while power was applied. Except for a few occasions, the
    light did not respond to the switch, so I still suspect the switch. When
    the light was off, I had about 12 VDC. When on, about 4 VDC.

    It’s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply short out the switch, but it’s very difficult to identify and reach its microscopic solder pads and I’m no good at micro soldering.  I think my best bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing and cutting
    it as necessary, hoping that it will yield access to solder points that
    I can bridge with a short. If that cures it, fine. And I’ll probably buy that other light anyway.

    BTW, Peter White is not pleased about the tariff situation. He says he won’t raise prices on current stock, but with the next shipment he’ll probably have to.



    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Mon Apr 7 15:09:13 2025
    On 4/7/2025 12:53 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Apr 6 22:22:33 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    I'm not an electronics guy. But speaking of problems, I think I
    mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night ride, my headlight (B&M
    Eyc N plus), powered by my good old sidewall generator, was randomly
    and sporadically blinking off. I put the bike on the workstand, checked
    out the wiring (it?s original and pristine), and spent some time
    spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight worked, sometimes not,
    and it changed state at random without having been touched. I was
    suspicious of the tiny on/off switch hidden behind a rubber plug, in
    part because I felt no satisfying click.

    I substituted a different (lower quality) LED dynamo light, which seemed
    to work perfectly and probably absolved the generator. I eventually
    talked by phone to Peter White, who sold me the light far longer ago
    than I remembered - ten years! I asked if he had clues on diagnosing the
    problem. He did not, but suggested that the identical light without the
    possible failure point of an on/off switch is just $35. (A sidewall
    dyno doesn't need a switch.) Still, I opted to open the light to see if
    I could spot anything because I have a compulsion about fixing things -
    but a headlight has to be really, really reliable.

    Here are photos of the electronic guts, with a vernier caliper for size
    (and to educate Tom!).

    Bottom view. The downward facing LED is at the top of the photo, the
    suspicious switch is the tiny white box at the photo?s bottom.
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/ >>
    Top of the circuit board. The large copper pad is part of the heat sink
    system, contacting a metal casting that forms the top of the headlamp
    body. I?ll probably add some heat conducting goop when I reassemble:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/dateposted-public/ >>
    Although a bike generator or dynamo puts out AC, I had hoped to diagnose
    it using DC, figuring a 6 volt battery would essentially supply half of
    the sine wave so half of the input circuit. That naturally works with
    incandescents, and it worked with one Avenir LED dyno headlight that I
    repaired. Not so in this case. So I ran another generator using a roller
    chucked in my drill press, attached a digital voltmeter in parallel, and
    poked around best I could. I saw nothing loose, no scorched components,
    nothing obviously wrong.

    With no power attached, I tried checking for continuity across the
    switch. It always showed close to zero ohms, never infinity - but the
    resistance readings with pinpoint probes were jumpy, and since the
    switch wasn?t isolated from the circuit, that may not mean much.

    I used contact cleaner to blast out the switch and repeatedly clicked
    it, including while power was applied. Except for a few occasions, the
    light did not respond to the switch, so I still suspect the switch. When
    the light was off, I had about 12 VDC. When on, about 4 VDC.

    It?s still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply
    short out the switch, but it?s very difficult to identify and reach its
    microscopic solder pads and I?m no good at micro soldering. I think my
    best bet will be to mechanically remove the switch, crushing and cutting
    it as necessary, hoping that it will yield access to solder points that
    I can bridge with a short. If that cures it, fine. And I?ll probably buy
    that other light anyway.

    BTW, Peter White is not pleased about the tariff situation. He says he
    won?t raise prices on current stock, but with the next shipment he?ll
    probably have to.




    Frank, I have to appologize concerning the caliper measurements of bolt I was sure was 4 mm. The digital caliper was giving me intermittent readings and the manual caliper has a mm scale too small for me to accurately read (with my recent stroke my
    eyesight is affected) but what looks like 4 mm. But it is a dial caliper and with your insistance as well as Andrew's in mind I zerod the dial gauge and read the inch scale with was exactly 0.19 inches which is a little more than 4.8 mm So, indeed, the
    cage mounting screws are 5 mm and I should have taken your and Andrew's words for it.


    Thanks for confirming.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Zen Cycle on Mon Apr 7 15:16:06 2025
    On 4/7/2025 9:28 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    <snip>

    "PWM DC"? PWM by definition isn't DC. PWM generators even at maximum
    drive aren't 100% duty cycle (yes, effectively DC considering the
    response of the LED, but still not exactly DC).

    Yes. PWM is a DC voltage with varying pulse widths. It never goes below
    0V like AC.

    BTW, Frank could have just used a transformer like <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B094NRRKC1> to simulate a 6VAC dynamo, or
    even a 16-24VAC doorbell transformer with some resistors to divide the
    voltage and limit the current, but it's really not worth spending much
    money to try to fix an inexpensive bicycle headlight.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 17:15:44 2025
    On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 15:16:06 -0700, sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
    wrote:

    On 4/7/2025 9:28 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    <snip>

    "PWM DC"? PWM by definition isn't DC. PWM generators even at maximum
    drive aren't 100% duty cycle (yes, effectively DC considering the
    response of the LED, but still not exactly DC).

    Yes. PWM is a DC voltage with varying pulse widths.

    It never goes below 0V like AC.

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used. However, it's
    not mandatory or the only way: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.

    "Sine Pulse Width Modulator (SPWM)" <https://www.bldcmotor.org/how-to-control-bldc-motor-using-pwm.html>

    BTW, Frank could have just used a transformer like ><https://www.amazon.com/dp/B094NRRKC1> to simulate a 6VAC dynamo, or
    even a 16-24VAC doorbell transformer with some resistors to divide the >voltage and limit the current, but it's really not worth spending much
    money to try to fix an inexpensive bicycle headlight.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to sms on Tue Apr 8 05:50:54 2025
    On 4/7/2025 6:16 PM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 9:28 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    <snip>

    "PWM DC"? PWM by definition isn't DC. PWM generators even at maximum
    drive aren't 100% duty cycle (yes, effectively DC considering the
    response of the LED, but still not exactly DC).

    Yes. PWM is a DC voltage with varying pulse widths.

    nope, As soon as you start introducing 'pulse widths' you're no longer
    talking about DC.


    It never goes below
    0V like AC.

    I see, you're using AC in the context that "alternating current"
    reverses current flow with respect to ground (certainly a valid interpretation).

    The more generic usage of 'AC' is a sinusoidal waveform, which may be
    sitting on a bias that prevents it from going above or below the ground reference.

    That said, I'd be interested to see a reference claiming a PWM waveform
    is DC. I couldn't find one. It's pulsatile, which by definition is not considered DC.



    BTW, Frank could have just used a transformer like <https:// www.amazon.com/dp/B094NRRKC1> to simulate a 6VAC dynamo, or even a
    16-24VAC doorbell transformer with some resistors to divide the voltage
    and limit the current, but it's really not worth spending much money to
    try to fix an inexpensive bicycle headlight.

    but hey, he's retired, he doesn't have much else to do besides bitch
    about helmets in a usenet group.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Tue Apr 8 13:40:19 2025
    On 4/8/2025 12:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 2:58 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    I'm not an electronics guy. But speaking of problems, I think I
    mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night ride, my headlight
    (B&M Eyc N plus),  powered by my good old sidewall generator, was
    randomly and sporadically blinking off. I put the bike on the
    workstand, checked out the wiring (it’s original and pristine), and
    spent some time spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight
    worked, sometimes not, and it changed state at random without having
    been touched. I was suspicious of the tiny on/off switch hidden
    behind a rubber plug, in part because I felt no satisfying click.

    I substituted a different (lower quality) LED dynamo light, which
    seemed to work perfectly and probably absolved the generator. I
    eventually talked by phone to Peter White, who sold me the light far
    longer ago than I remembered - ten years! I asked if he had clues on
    diagnosing the problem. He did not, but suggested that the identical
    light without the possible failure point of an  on/off switch is just
    $35. (A sidewall dyno doesn't need a switch.) Still, I opted to open
    the light to see if I could spot anything because I have a compulsion
    about fixing things - but a headlight has to be really, really reliable. >>>
    Here are photos of the electronic guts, with a vernier caliper for
    size (and to educate Tom!).

    Bottom view. The downward facing LED is at the top of the photo, the
    suspicious switch is the tiny white box at the photo’s bottom.
    https:// www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/
    dateposted- public/

    Top of the circuit board. The large copper pad is part of the heat
    sink system, contacting a metal casting that forms the top of the
    headlamp body. I’ll probably add some heat conducting goop when I
    reassemble:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/dateposted-
    public/


    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read the numbers off
    the 16 pin IC?
    It has no numbers or other codes at all! It's solid black with a sort of
    fine stippled finish.


    Take another look. I can see 4 rows of text but the resolution on the
    picture isn't good enough to make it out. FWIW, it's the square device
    in your second picture with 4 solder joints on each side, next to the
    octagonal device with "220" written on it (that's a 220uH inductor,
    likely part of a PWM or PS switcher circuit).

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Tue Apr 8 13:12:50 2025
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    <snip>

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used. However, it's
    not mandatory or the only way: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's
    not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed
    control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company
    has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when
    all you have on is the daytime running light.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Tue Apr 8 16:00:01 2025
    On 4/8/2025 3:04 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 1:40 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 12:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 2:58 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read the numbers off
    the 16 pin IC?
    It has no numbers or other codes at all! It's solid black with a sort
    of fine stippled finish.


    Take another look. I can see 4 rows of text but the resolution on the
    picture isn't good enough to make it out. FWIW, it's the square device
    in your second picture with 4 solder joints on each side, next to the
    octagonal device with "220" written on it (that's a 220uH inductor,
    likely part of a PWM or PS switcher circuit).

    Sorry, Zen, it absolutely has no writing on it. I don't know if I can
    manage a micro photograph to convince you, but I'm using a high powered
    loupe in sunlight. It's just a stippled black finish.



    Try again, using this as a reference:

    https://1drv.ms/i/c/5c034a6b86a172e9/EX6snfFdTeJMl1tfB4xqOUwBXw_4YXVPsbTNjw04Bpgcdw?e=lFRSWg

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the first line, but
    that's it.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Zen Cycle on Tue Apr 8 13:30:49 2025
    On 4/8/2025 1:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    <snip>

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the first line, but
    that's it.

    I would guess that it's a PWM Controller in a PLCC-20 package, i.e.
    TI/Unitrode UC18xx.

    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to sms on Tue Apr 8 16:43:13 2025
    On 4/8/2025 4:30 PM, sms wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 1:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    <snip>

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the first line, but
    that's it.

    I would guess that it's a PWM Controller in a PLCC-20 package, i.e. TI/ Unitrode UC18xx.


    Except that it's a 16 pin device, and appears to be a leadless package, something more like this:

    https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/analog-devices-inc-maxim-integrated/MAX1534ETE-T/1475835


    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to sms on Tue Apr 8 20:41:06 2025
    sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    <snip>

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used. However, it's
    not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's
    not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company
    has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when
    all you have on is the daytime running light.


    Fairly sure it would be very niche use, as modern bike lights tend to have fairly substantial batteries and thus on low the run time is many hours,
    over a day in some cases.

    And considering the relative low output from the dynamo even if the light
    was off, light on be even less output, note how slowly and generally need
    good conditions (ie constant relatively high speeds) to charge even a
    mobile phone in a timely fashion, which is by some measure has smaller
    battery.

    The question is why would one do that when as when you stop at home etc, charging the light is fairly quick and painless job, every few days or so.

    Ie I can’t see folks saying yes that’s what I need!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 8 15:20:57 2025
    On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:00:01 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 4/8/2025 3:04 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 1:40 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 12:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 2:58 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read the numbers off
    the 16 pin IC?
    It has no numbers or other codes at all! It's solid black with a sort
    of fine stippled finish.


    Take another look. I can see 4 rows of text but the resolution on the
    picture isn't good enough to make it out. FWIW, it's the square device
    in your second picture with 4 solder joints on each side, next to the
    octagonal device with "220" written on it (that's a 220uH inductor,
    likely part of a PWM or PS switcher circuit).

    Sorry, Zen, it absolutely has no writing on it. I don't know if I can
    manage a micro photograph to convince you, but I'm using a high powered
    loupe in sunlight. It's just a stippled black finish.



    Try again, using this as a reference:

    https://1drv.ms/i/c/5c034a6b86a172e9/EX6snfFdTeJMl1tfB4xqOUwBXw_4YXVPsbTNjw04Bpgcdw?e=lFRSWg

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the first line, but
    that's it.

    I tried feeding the original photo to an online AI photo enhancer: <https://yce.perfectcorp.com/photo-enhance>
    The photo is too far out of focus to produce more than a few
    characters.

    Frank. If you photograph something at an angle as in the photo of the
    PCB, the depth of field will limit the surface area that will be in
    focus. I suggest you take the photo again and position the camera
    more perpendicular to the PCB. Don't position the camera perfectly perpendicular or you might see a reflection. If your camera has an
    autofocus area mode feature, that allows you focus on a specific area
    of interest, it will autofocus on this area of interest and blur
    everything outside this area. The area of interest is usually the
    center of the screen, but on some cameras, can be resized and moved
    anywhere on the image.

    Also, brighter light will improve the depth of field. (Smaller
    apertures have a greater depth of field). However, don't use a point
    source of light or your photos will have shadows.

    "What are Autofocus Area Modes? | Camera Focusing Basics Pt.3" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlzlKZWUI38>

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 9 12:35:15 2025
    Am 08.04.2025 um 22:12 schrieb sms:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used.  However, it's
    not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's
    not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company
    has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when
    all you have on is the daytime running light.

    "No" is a not quite correct, "extremely rare" would describe the market
    better.
    <https://nabendynamo.de/produkte/scheinwerfer/ladelux/>

    Slightly more common: a "dynamo driven power supply" produces power to a
    USE output, and theoretially you can route that USB power into your bikt
    light but with no fine-tuned optimization the output is too low to make
    it worthwhile in any sense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 9 12:57:18 2025
    Am 08.04.2025 um 18:33 schrieb Frank Krygowski:
    On 4/7/2025 11:56 AM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there
    are ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    As I mentioned in discussions here years ago, one LED dyno headlight I
    own has a very simple circuit: IIRC just a bridge rectifier, a voltage regulator, a resistor and a capacitor feeding one LED.

    It's obvious from my photos of this B&M lamp that the electronics are
    much more complicated. I'm disappointed that the electronics experts
    here have never commented on what the likely functions of all that complexity.

    Not being an electronics guy myself, I can still comment on the "likely function of all that complexity".

    <https://www.bike-components.de/de/busch-mueller/Lumotec-IQ2-Eyc-N-Plus-LED-Frontlicht-mit-StVZO-Zulassung-p37751/>

    The main parts are identical to a cheap light:
    Rectifier, one LED, heat sink, switch.

    The main difference to a cheap LED light is the effort taken to optimize
    the optical system (reflector design and low-tolerance placement of the
    LED in relation to the reflector) - The "N" in the name stands for
    "optimized near field".

    The "Plus" in the name adds a (gold-cap?) capacitor, probably 1.0F or
    2.0F, with two purposes:
    a) provide several minutes of "stand light" functionality (IIRC
    typically switches off after 4 minutes)
    c) reduce flicker at low speeds

    The additional electronics is necessary to milk more than 3W out of a "nominally 3W" (hub) dynamo; I'm not sure whether this works for your
    bottle dynamo.

    Rolf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Apr 9 06:53:17 2025
    On 4/8/2025 6:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 6:29 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 5:15 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 4:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 3:04 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 1:40 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 12:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 2:58 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read the numbers >>>>>>>> off the 16 pin IC?
    It has no numbers or other codes at all! It's solid black with a >>>>>>> sort of fine stippled finish.


    Take another look. I can see 4 rows of text but the resolution on
    the picture isn't good enough to make it out. FWIW, it's the
    square device in your second picture with 4 solder joints on each
    side, next to the octagonal device with "220" written on it
    (that's a 220uH inductor, likely part of a PWM or PS switcher
    circuit).

    Sorry, Zen, it absolutely has no writing on it. I don't know if I
    can manage a micro photograph to convince you, but I'm using a high
    powered loupe in sunlight. It's just a stippled black finish.



    Try again, using this as a reference:

    https://1drv.ms/i/c/5c034a6b86a172e9/
    EX6snfFdTeJMl1tfB4xqOUwBXw_4YXVPsbTNjw04Bpgcdw?e=lFRSWg

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the first line, but
    that's it.

    Those are reflections. There is no text, no letters, no numbers. I'll
    try to get a super-closeup photo later, but this is silly.

    Here are two more shots, through a loupe:

    https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54440036155_e9437c6d58_m.jpg

    https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54438807352_4bb9fb0d30_m.jpg

    Honest, no text, no letters, no numbers.
    Here's a larger version of the better one. I think I clicked wrong
    before generating that link.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54438807352/in/dateposted-
    public/

    It does seem odd to have an unlabeled 16 pin device. I can check to see
    if that's some sort of coating applied over some text.

    ... Nope. Some fine black stuff scraped away, and the surface now looks smoother, but still no visible characters.



    I don't know what to tell you except maybe get someone with better
    eyesight to look at it. The First of the new photos is a good angle, I
    can see the lines of text but still blurry. The second and third of the
    new photos are a bad angle such that the light doesn't catch the text,
    but better resolution.

    I know Jeff has already commented about seeing the text, I'd be
    interested if anyone else has seen the photos and can comment.

    _All_ devices of this type are laser etched with the part number and
    some sort of factory/lot/date code, or at the very least with some type
    of abbreviated code that you can decipher with the data sheet. Some
    companies _do_ have devices custom built with no markings to prevent
    reverse engineering, but those are rare and generally restricted to
    higher dollar items.

    No big deal. It was just a matter of personal interest, don't bother
    putting anymore effort into it if you don't want to.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Wed Apr 9 07:07:19 2025
    On 4/8/2025 6:20 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:00:01 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 4/8/2025 3:04 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 1:40 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 12:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 2:58 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read the numbers off >>>>>> the 16 pin IC?
    It has no numbers or other codes at all! It's solid black with a sort >>>>> of fine stippled finish.


    Take another look. I can see 4 rows of text but the resolution on the
    picture isn't good enough to make it out. FWIW, it's the square device >>>> in your second picture with 4 solder joints on each side, next to the
    octagonal device with "220" written on it (that's a 220uH inductor,
    likely part of a PWM or PS switcher circuit).

    Sorry, Zen, it absolutely has no writing on it. I don't know if I can
    manage a micro photograph to convince you, but I'm using a high powered
    loupe in sunlight. It's just a stippled black finish.



    Try again, using this as a reference:

    https://1drv.ms/i/c/5c034a6b86a172e9/EX6snfFdTeJMl1tfB4xqOUwBXw_4YXVPsbTNjw04Bpgcdw?e=lFRSWg

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the first line, but
    that's it.

    I tried feeding the original photo to an online AI photo enhancer: <https://yce.perfectcorp.com/photo-enhance>
    The photo is too far out of focus to produce more than a few
    characters.

    I can still see some blurred text in the first of the newer photos, but
    no real improvement. The other newer photo and the larger version of
    that he sent subsequently is a bad angle, looks more like the "solid
    black with a sort of fine stippled finish." he's describing


    Frank. If you photograph something at an angle as in the photo of the
    PCB, the depth of field will limit the surface area that will be in
    focus. I suggest you take the photo again and position the camera
    more perpendicular to the PCB.

    The light will need to be angled to enhance the etching on the part. An omnidirectional light source can obscure the etching (I know this from
    personal experience).

    Don't position the camera perfectly
    perpendicular or you might see a reflection. If your camera has an
    autofocus area mode feature, that allows you focus on a specific area
    of interest, it will autofocus on this area of interest and blur
    everything outside this area. The area of interest is usually the
    center of the screen, but on some cameras, can be resized and moved
    anywhere on the image.

    Also, brighter light will improve the depth of field. (Smaller
    apertures have a greater depth of field). However, don't use a point
    source of light or your photos will have shadows.

    "What are Autofocus Area Modes? | Camera Focusing Basics Pt.3" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlzlKZWUI38>


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Apr 9 07:44:22 2025
    On 4/8/2025 12:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 11:56 AM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC, though there
    are ways around this if the light has multiple LEDs (two LEDs each
    conducting for half the cycle). If there is only a single LED it can
    still be powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be wasteful as
    it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    First, here's what I said: "I had hoped to diagnose it using DC,
    figuring a 6 volt battery would essentially supply half of the sine wave
    so half of the input circuit. That naturally works with incandescents,
    and it worked with one Avenir LED dyno headlight that I repaired."

    My reference to "essentially half the sine wave" meant that electron
    flow from a DC battery would be in the same direction as the flow during
    half the sine wave, and might serve to determine what part of the
    circuit was open.

    And as I said, the DC source has worked with other LED dyno headlights.
    It works with the Avenir I own, it works with a B&M Lyt that I just
    tested. Both are single LED headlamps. It didn't work with the B&M Eyc
    I'm trying to repair. But maybe that's related to its inconsistent and intermittent fault.

    As I mentioned in discussions here years ago, one LED dyno headlight I
    own has a very simple circuit: IIRC just a bridge rectifier, a voltage regulator, a resistor and a capacitor feeding one LED.

    It's obvious from my photos of this B&M lamp that the electronics are
    much more complicated. I'm disappointed that the electronics experts
    here have never commented on what the likely functions of all that complexity.

    You didn't ask that question previously:

    The lamp is significantly more complex in order to control multiple LEDs
    with different drive levels by processing input sensor sensor data.

    According to the user manual, it has several modes of operation:

    https://www.bumm.de/files/Produkte/LUMOTEC%20Eyc_Avy_IQ-XS.PDF

    "Functionality of the sensor mode:
    During daylight, the headlight operates in “day mode”.
    The driving light LED in the headlight shines dimmed onto the road. The additional DRL LEDs shine with full luminance. Maximal visibility for
    oncoming traffic!
    (Eyc T, IQXS T: The indicator LED in the rear push button shines with
    full intensity.)
    During dusk or darkness, the headlight automatically switches to “night mode”. The driving light emits the full luminance. The daytime running
    LEDs stay dark (Eyc T,IQXS T) or shine with diminished luminance (Avy
    T). Maximum vision, additional visibility for oncoming traffic! (Eyc T,
    IQXS T: The indicator LED in the rear push button shines dimly.)
    The light/dark sensor switches the headlamp from mode “Night” to “Day” with a predetermined delay of 8 sec. so that a temporary brightness
    (e.g. car headlights turned up) will not cause immediate switching."

    These different modes require processing information from the sensors to
    switch the drive control of the different LEDs. That 16 pin device I've
    been asking about is likely a micro controller with a simple program
    performing a Boolean function.

    This LEDs are likely being driven by a PWM circuit to control the
    brightness of more than one LED. The PWM circuit is being controlled by
    the sensor circuits.

    As noted in the manual excerpt, the lamp will autoswitch dring daylight
    hours to a DRL mode, and at night has a delay of 8 seconds so car
    headlights don't autodim the lamp (likely controlled by the uC). Then
    there's the 'standby mode' where the unit switches from the power supply
    to the storage cap while stopped. This may be a simple analog circuit
    but it may also be a digitally controlled switch that senses when power
    is being generated from the dynamo.

    So, yes, significantly more complex than a basic LED being driven from a
    power supply.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to zen cycle on Wed Apr 9 07:39:30 2025
    On 4/9/2025 5:53 AM, zen cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 6:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 6:29 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 5:15 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 4:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 3:04 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 1:40 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 12:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 2:58 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read
    the numbers off the 16 pin IC?
    It has no numbers or other codes at all! It's solid
    black with a sort of fine stippled finish.


    Take another look. I can see 4 rows of text but the
    resolution on the picture isn't good enough to make
    it out. FWIW, it's the square device in your second
    picture with 4 solder joints on each side, next to
    the octagonal device with "220" written on it (that's
    a 220uH inductor, likely part of a PWM or PS switcher
    circuit).

    Sorry, Zen, it absolutely has no writing on it. I
    don't know if I can manage a micro photograph to
    convince you, but I'm using a high powered loupe in
    sunlight. It's just a stippled black finish.



    Try again, using this as a reference:

    https://1drv.ms/i/c/5c034a6b86a172e9/
    EX6snfFdTeJMl1tfB4xqOUwBXw_4YXVPsbTNjw04Bpgcdw?e=lFRSWg

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the
    first line, but that's it.

    Those are reflections. There is no text, no letters, no
    numbers. I'll try to get a super-closeup photo later,
    but this is silly.

    Here are two more shots, through a loupe:

    https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/54440036155_e9437c6d58_m.jpg

    https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/54438807352_4bb9fb0d30_m.jpg

    Honest, no text, no letters, no numbers.
    Here's a larger version of the better one. I think I
    clicked wrong before generating that link.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54438807352/in/
    dateposted- public/

    It does seem odd to have an unlabeled 16 pin device. I can
    check to see if that's some sort of coating applied over
    some text.

    ... Nope. Some fine black stuff scraped away, and the
    surface now looks smoother, but still no visible characters.



    I don't know what to tell you except maybe get someone with
    better eyesight to look at it. The First of the new photos
    is a good angle, I can see the lines of text but still
    blurry. The second and third of the new photos are a bad
    angle such that the light doesn't catch the text, but better
    resolution.

    I know Jeff has already commented about seeing the text, I'd
    be interested if anyone else has seen the photos and can
    comment.

    _All_ devices of this type are laser etched with the part
    number and some sort of factory/lot/date code, or at the
    very least with some type of abbreviated code that you can
    decipher with the data sheet. Some companies _do_ have
    devices custom built with no markings to prevent reverse
    engineering, but those are rare and generally restricted to
    higher dollar items.

    No big deal. It was just a matter of personal interest,
    don't bother putting anymore effort into it if you don't
    want to.


    A customer produces an industrial machine based on his
    father's design patent for which my customer (an academic
    electrical engineer PhD) makes up the controller boards. He
    scuffs the top of some chips and coats them with epoxy.

    I can see where a manufacturer would request electronic bits
    with no number if it would otherwise reveal information to
    competitors but I don't think that's likely for a bicycle
    lamp. Not unreasonable for a $50K machine.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Apr 9 12:19:46 2025
    On 4/9/2025 11:59 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/9/2025 6:53 AM, zen cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 6:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 6:29 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 5:15 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 4:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 3:04 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 1:40 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 12:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 2:58 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    Just as a matter of personal interest, can you read the
    numbers off the 16 pin IC?
    It has no numbers or other codes at all! It's solid black with >>>>>>>>> a sort of fine stippled finish.


    Take another look. I can see 4 rows of text but the resolution >>>>>>>> on the picture isn't good enough to make it out. FWIW, it's the >>>>>>>> square device in your second picture with 4 solder joints on
    each side, next to the octagonal device with "220" written on it >>>>>>>> (that's a 220uH inductor, likely part of a PWM or PS switcher
    circuit).

    Sorry, Zen, it absolutely has no writing on it. I don't know if I >>>>>>> can manage a micro photograph to convince you, but I'm using a
    high powered loupe in sunlight. It's just a stippled black finish. >>>>>>>


    Try again, using this as a reference:

    https://1drv.ms/i/c/5c034a6b86a172e9/
    EX6snfFdTeJMl1tfB4xqOUwBXw_4YXVPsbTNjw04Bpgcdw?e=lFRSWg

    4 lines of text. I think I can make out 4x35x on the first line,
    but that's it.

    Those are reflections. There is no text, no letters, no numbers.
    I'll try to get a super-closeup photo later, but this is silly.

    Here are two more shots, through a loupe:

    https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54440036155_e9437c6d58_m.jpg

    https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54438807352_4bb9fb0d30_m.jpg

    Honest, no text, no letters, no numbers.
    Here's a larger version of the better one. I think I clicked wrong
    before generating that link.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54438807352/in/dateposted-
    public/

    It does seem odd to have an unlabeled 16 pin device. I can check to
    see if that's some sort of coating applied over some text.

    ... Nope. Some fine black stuff scraped away, and the surface now
    looks smoother, but still no visible characters.



    I don't know what to tell you except maybe get someone with better
    eyesight to look at it. The First of the new photos is a good angle, I
    can see the lines of text but still blurry. The second and third of
    the new photos are a bad angle such that the light doesn't catch the
    text, but better resolution.

    I know Jeff has already commented about seeing the text, I'd be
    interested if anyone else has seen the photos and can comment.

    _All_ devices of this type are laser etched with the part number and
    some sort of factory/lot/date code, or at the very least with some
    type of abbreviated code that you can decipher with the data sheet.
    Some companies _do_ have devices custom built with no markings to
    prevent reverse engineering, but those are rare and generally
    restricted to higher dollar items.

    No big deal. It was just a matter of personal interest, don't bother
    putting anymore effort into it if you don't want to.

    I'd require a better camera to get a better photo than this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54438807352/in/dateposted-
    public/

    What can I say? Using my eyes with a variety of magnifiers, I see no markings. After some light scraping, I see no markings. In the photos I
    see no markings. I could try heavier scraping in case B&M was very
    diligent about keeping their chips secret...

    But I don't see any more effort in identifying that chip is justified.
    It certainly has no bearing on getting the headlight to work.

    No big deal. It was just a matter of personal interest, don't bother
    putting anymore effort into it if you don't want to. But there is
    marking on the device, it's just too blurry to read.


    I'm still curious if electronics people here can address the complexity
    of the circuit, at least in general. Any ideas what it's all for?

    Answered this morning: https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=123713&group=rec.bicycles.tech#123713

    I'll
    remind you that I do have some LED dynamo headlights that light up when
    I apply DC. This one does not. Is that a clue to what the circuit is doing?

    That's difficult to answer without seeing the schematic but the DC
    source you're using might not be putting out enough voltage to trigger a threshold for the system to work - your comment in the OP that you were
    getting 12 V when using the dynamo leads me to beleive a 6 V DC source
    isn't going to work. OR, it could be that the system is designed for use
    with an AC source there may be some filtering with series capacitance
    which would block DC if used as the source....tough to say.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Apr 9 12:04:58 2025
    On 4/9/2025 11:39 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/9/2025 7:44 AM, zen cycle wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 12:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 11:56 AM, sms wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 8:16 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 10:22 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    <snip>

    A battery puts out DC, it does not provide "half of a
    sine wave."

    An LED dynamo light would be rectifying the AC into DC,
    though there are ways around this if the light has
    multiple LEDs (two LEDs each conducting for half the
    cycle). If there is only a single LED it can still be
    powered by the AC from the dynamo but it would be
    wasteful as it would only be lit for half the cycle.

    First, here's what I said: "I had hoped to diagnose it
    using DC, figuring a 6 volt battery would essentially
    supply half of the sine wave so half of the input
    circuit. That naturally works with incandescents, and it
    worked with one Avenir LED dyno headlight that I repaired."

    My reference to "essentially half the sine wave" meant
    that electron flow from a DC battery would be in the same
    direction as the flow during half the sine wave, and
    might serve to determine what part of the circuit was open.

    And as I said, the DC source has worked with other LED
    dyno headlights. It works with the Avenir I own, it works
    with a B&M Lyt that I just tested. Both are single LED
    headlamps. It didn't work with the B&M Eyc I'm trying to
    repair. But maybe that's related to its inconsistent and
    intermittent fault.

    As I mentioned in discussions here years ago, one LED
    dyno headlight I own has a very simple circuit: IIRC just
    a bridge rectifier, a voltage regulator, a resistor and a
    capacitor feeding one LED.

    It's obvious from my photos of this B&M lamp that the
    electronics are much more complicated. I'm disappointed
    that the electronics experts here have never commented on
    what the likely functions of all that complexity.

    You didn't ask that question previously:

    The lamp is significantly more complex in order to control
    multiple LEDs with different drive levels by processing
    input sensor sensor data.

    According to the user manual, it has several modes of
    operation:

    https://www.bumm.de/files/Produkte/LUMOTEC%20Eyc_Avy_IQ-
    XS.PDF

    "Functionality of the sensor mode:
    During daylight, the headlight operates in “day mode”.
    The driving light LED in the headlight shines dimmed onto
    the road. The additional DRL LEDs shine with full
    luminance. Maximal visibility for oncoming traffic!
    (Eyc T, IQXS T: The indicator LED in the rear push button
    shines with full intensity.)
    During dusk or darkness, the headlight automatically
    switches to “night mode”. The driving light emits the full
    luminance. The daytime running LEDs stay dark (Eyc T,IQXS
    T) or shine with diminished luminance (Avy T). Maximum
    vision, additional visibility for oncoming traffic! (Eyc
    T, IQXS T: The indicator LED in the rear push button
    shines dimly.)
    The light/dark sensor switches the headlamp from mode
    “Night” to “Day” with a predetermined delay of 8 sec. so
    that a temporary brightness (e.g. car headlights turned
    up) will not cause immediate switching."

    These different modes require processing information from
    the sensors to switch the drive control of the different
    LEDs. That 16 pin device I've been asking about is likely
    a micro controller with a simple program performing a
    Boolean function.

    This LEDs are likely being driven by a PWM circuit to
    control the brightness of more than one LED. The PWM
    circuit is being controlled by the sensor circuits.

    As noted in the manual excerpt, the lamp will autoswitch
    dring daylight hours to a DRL mode, and at night has a
    delay of 8 seconds so car headlights don't autodim the
    lamp (likely controlled by the uC). Then there's the
    'standby mode' where the unit switches from the power
    supply to the storage cap while stopped. This may be a
    simple analog circuit but it may also be a digitally
    controlled switch that senses when power is being
    generated from the dynamo.

    So, yes, significantly more complex than a basic LED being
    driven from a power supply.

    I suspect most of that document refers to a later model of
    this headlight. (Mine is ten years old.) I say that because
    of the remarks about multiple LEDs, etc. This one has only
    one LED, it has no "senso" or auto-control function. There
    is an ineffective yellow "indicator LED" at the switch end.
    It's incredibly tiny - maybe 0.1mm diameter - and so dim I
    didn't notice it at first.

    I suppose it's possible they designed one circuit board for
    all existing and upcoming models of the headlight. There
    seem to be several unused solder pads near the one LED in
    this photo: https://www.flickr.com/ photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/
    The LED is the bright white rounded square toward the "top"
    of the photo. That "top" edge faces forward in the assembled
    headlight.

    If that's the case, then most of the circuitry might be
    redundant in the headlight I own.

    Incidentally, Rolf mentioned getting extra power out of the
    dynamo. My digital meter consistently shows 4 VAC when the
    lamp is running off my drill press. (That's at an effective
    road speed of about 14 mph.) Given that bike dynamos are
    essentially constant current devices pumping about half an
    amp, it seems like it's drawing only about two Watts
    electrical power. Mechanical input would be more than two
    Watts, of course - maybe four to six Watts.

    Which reminds me that in my phone call with Peter White, he
    says he never bothers to turn his headlamps off. Especially
    with a hub dyno, the power draw is negligible. This is a
    bottle dyno, so zero watts drawn when I swing it out of
    contact.


    I'm with Mr White on that. None of my dynamo systems have
    switches and haven't since I wired past my first failed one
    in 1972.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Apr 10 09:29:45 2025
    On 4/9/2025 10:04 AM, AMuzi wrote:

    I'm with Mr White on that. None of my dynamo systems have switches and haven't since I wired past my first failed one in 1972.
    Switches, especially low-voltage switches are prone to failure.

    But higher-end dynamo lights will often have multiple modes that require
    a switch but it is often handlebar mounted.

    For a mid-cost, switchless, dynamo light, I recommend the 100 Lux
    H-Black Pro Dynamo <https://herrmans.eu/products/front-lights-4147/dynamo-10038/h-black-pro-dynamo/>
    for about $50 <https://www.bike24.com/p2214107.html>.

    It's a lot better than the low-cost dynamo lights at 20-40 lux. I bought
    one in 2017 for €62,94 so they come down in price.

    Not the latest in LED efficiency, but more than adequate, and the optics
    are very good.

    A lot of people don't realize how vitally important the optics are in
    bicycle lighting, especially in dynamo lights where you only have a few
    watts of power to work with.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 10 10:02:30 2025
    On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 22:22:33 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    I have a some time right now. I'll try to answer Frank's original
    question and avoid the inevitable topic drift. Please forgive my
    being rather terse.

    I think I
    mentioned a few days ago that on a recent night ride, my headlight (B&M
    Eyc N plus), powered by my good old sidewall generator, was randomly
    and sporadically blinking off.

    It the light this one? <https://www.rivbike.com/products/b-m-eyc-t-senso-plus-dyno-headlight>
    I couldn't find a "good old sidewall generator". Could you be a bit
    more specific?

    I put the bike on the workstand, checked
    out the wiring (its original and pristine), and spent some time
    spinning the front wheel. Sometimes the headlight worked, sometimes not,
    and it changed state at random without having been touched. I was
    suspicious of the tiny on/off switch hidden behind a rubber plug, in
    part because I felt no satisfying click.

    Start by isolating the problem. Is the intermittent light in the
    generator (dynamo) section or in the light? Find a different dynamo
    to power the light or move the light to a different bicycles with a
    different power source. If replacing the dynamo magically fixes the
    problem, I suggest that you tear the dynamo apart and clean it out.

    Next, pull on the wires between the dynamo and light. Yes, I said
    PULL. If the copper wire falls apart and the insulating jacket
    stretches and narrows at the beak point, you've found the problem. If
    the light refuses to work after you've pulled on the wires, you
    probably have a broken wire somewhere that's hiding under the
    insulation.

    If it's not in the dynamo or the wiring, then it must be in the light.
    Start with an electric tooth brush. The idea is to use it as a
    vibrator to isolate the section that has gone intermittent. If the
    vibrating tooth brush doesn't crack your teeth when used in the
    originally intended manner, it's probably safe to use on a bicycle
    light. The most likely areas are loose magnets, corroded switches,
    corroded electrical contacts, broken PCB (printed circuit board)
    traces, "cold" PCB solder connections, bad soldering, or intermittent
    wire bonds inside the IC's (integrated circuits).

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-public/ >https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279589/in/dateposted-public/

    Nice photos of the caliper. However, the PCB is out of focus. Flickr
    reduces the resolution of the photo when upload. I can see things
    that might be a problem, but only if the photo has higher contrast,
    more brightness (to improve depth of field, and of course, that it's
    properly in focus. I think you can improve your photos by using
    multiple sources of illumination from diffuse sources. The PCB photos
    that I post on YouTube usually use two LED light sources from lamps
    surrounding my desk. With two sources, shadows are reduced. With a
    ring light, they're reduced even more.

    With no power attached, I tried checking for continuity across the
    switch. It always showed close to zero ohms, never infinity - but the >resistance readings with pinpoint probes were jumpy...

    That's an important clue.

    I used contact cleaner to blast out the switch and repeatedly clicked
    it, including while power was applied. Except for a few occasions, the
    light did not respond to the switch, so I still suspect the switch. When
    the light was off, I had about 12 VDC. When on, about 4 VDC.

    The voltage across the switch contacts should be zero volts when the
    switch is on. However, if B&M is doing something odd, it could be
    something else. I can't tell without a schematic.

    Its still not fixed, but it's getting late here. I would try to simply
    short out the switch, but its very difficult to identify and reach its >microscopic solder pads and Im no good at micro soldering.

    Sharpen a paper clip. Wind it around the soldering iron tip. You now
    have a micro soldering iron. Get some liquid or paste rosin flux (not
    acid flux used in plumbing) and slop it on the solder pad before
    soldering. Use copper braid to suck up any excess solder. Done use a
    "solder sucker" on small pads and traces. <https://www.google.com/search?q=copper%20braid%20soldering&udm=2>

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 10 18:56:09 2025
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:35:15 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
    wrote:

    Am 08.04.2025 um 22:12 schrieb sms:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used. However, it's
    not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's
    not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed
    control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company
    has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when
    all you have on is the daytime running light.

    "No" is a not quite correct, "extremely rare" would describe the market >better.
    <https://nabendynamo.de/produkte/scheinwerfer/ladelux/>

    Slightly more common: a "dynamo driven power supply" produces power to a
    USE output, and theoretially you can route that USB power into your bikt >light but with no fine-tuned optimization the output is too low to make
    it worthwhile in any sense.

    This article shows 26 such bicycle USB chargers. That seems to be a
    popular use for bicycle dynamos. <https://www.cyclingabout.com/list-of-hub-dynamo-power-supplies-for-usb-devices/>


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Apr 10 19:23:34 2025
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:39:30 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    A customer produces an industrial machine based on his
    father's design patent for which my customer (an academic
    electrical engineer PhD) makes up the controller boards. He
    scuffs the top of some chips and coats them with epoxy.

    I can see where a manufacturer would request electronic bits
    with no number if it would otherwise reveal information to
    competitors but I don't think that's likely for a bicycle
    lamp. Not unreasonable for a $50K machine.

    I've had to repair products that have had the marking removed from the
    IC's by the manufacturer. The laser engraved markings are very
    shallow and difficult to read at some viewing angles. Filling the
    holes with paint solves that problem: <https://www.reddit.com/r/electronics/comments/190764u/make_laser_etched_markings_easily_visible_with/>
    However, the shallow laser "pits" can easily be mutilated with a hand
    grinder (Dremel tool). If you have trouble viewing or photographing
    IC markings, try different viewing angles.

    Long ago, when I was helping design marine radios, we were removing
    the markings from certain IC's that we considered proprietary
    information. One day, we experienced a very high failure rate of
    these IC's. It was soon determined that the grinder tool bearing (or
    bushing) had become worn causing the abrasive bit to wobble. That
    produced excessive vibration which broke the wire bonds inside the IC.
    Fixed with a new hand grinder and a better lubrication schedule.
    Incidentally, we eventually discontinued the grinding process after it
    was declared a waste of effort because the IC could be identified with
    an x-ray photograph of the die.



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 11 11:04:00 2025
    Am 11.04.2025 um 03:56 schrieb Jeff Liebermann:
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:35:15 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
    wrote:

    Am 08.04.2025 um 22:12 schrieb sms:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used.  However, it's >>>> not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's
    not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed
    control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company
    has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when
    all you have on is the daytime running light.

    "No" is a not quite correct, "extremely rare" would describe the market
    better.
    <https://nabendynamo.de/produkte/scheinwerfer/ladelux/>

    Slightly more common: a "dynamo driven power supply" produces power to a
    USE output, and theoretially you can route that USB power into your bikt
    light but with no fine-tuned optimization the output is too low to make
    it worthwhile in any sense.

    This article shows 26 such bicycle USB chargers. That seems to be a
    popular use for bicycle dynamos. <https://www.cyclingabout.com/list-of-hub-dynamo-power-supplies-for-usb-devices/>

    Sure, it's common to use a bike dynamo to charge low-power devices.
    Charging mobile phones barely works because many phones stop charging on
    a variable power supply.

    I have no direct knowledge of anybody using a dynamo to top up their
    battery lights.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Fri Apr 11 09:12:44 2025
    Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:35:15 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
    wrote:

    Am 08.04.2025 um 22:12 schrieb sms:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used.  However, it's >>>> not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's
    not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed
    control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company
    has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when
    all you have on is the daytime running light.

    "No" is a not quite correct, "extremely rare" would describe the market
    better.
    <https://nabendynamo.de/produkte/scheinwerfer/ladelux/>

    Slightly more common: a "dynamo driven power supply" produces power to a
    USE output, and theoretially you can route that USB power into your bikt
    light but with no fine-tuned optimization the output is too low to make
    it worthwhile in any sense.

    This article shows 26 such bicycle USB chargers. That seems to be a
    popular use for bicycle dynamos. <https://www.cyclingabout.com/list-of-hub-dynamo-power-supplies-for-usb-devices/>



    Must be some sort of market for them! Can’t say I’ve ever seen one in the flesh ie some dynamo charging.

    See just occasionally dynamo equipped bikes, due to just sheer numbers of
    bikes one sees out about around london. Though increasingly what they will become ie lights powered by a E bikes motor. Which allows quite the boost
    in power output.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Apr 11 09:15:40 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 8:56 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    The switch is the tiny white box toward the bottom of this photo:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-
    public/ just below "3R 46 16V" which is probably a capacitor. The black
    pushbutton sticks out downward in the photo (or backwards, in the
    mounted headlight) and looks odd in the photo, again because of
    reflections. That switch is about 4.5mm x 2.5mm x 1.8mm tall. I removed
    the switch from the circuit board.

    I had assumed it was a toggle, but it seems instead to be a momentary
    switch. It connects to five tiny solder pads. The two big ones, at the
    "bottom" of the switch in the photo, are just for fastening it to the
    board. At the "top" face in the photo are three very tiny pads, call
    them A, B and C.

    Playing with a jumper wire ending in two sharp pins, I found that
    momentary contact from A to C changed the state of the light, on to off
    to back on, etc. A to B did the same. I had to be careful to touch
    fairly quickly and not bounce.

    At last check, the light is in "on" state. I think if I don't disturb
    things, it should stay in that state, and I can try reassembling and
    testing it on the bike. I've got other stuff to work on tonight, so I'll
    get back to it tomorrow.

    More bench testing this morning. The headlamp started right up,
    perfectly consistently when driven by the dynamo spun with my drill
    press. Momentarily jumping A to C (or B) of those switch solder pads
    toggled the lamp on or off while running the dynamo. Shutting down the
    dynamo put the lamp into "standlight" mode. In that mode, with no
    voltage input, jumping A to C turned off the standlight. Applying power turned the lamp back on, no switching necessary. It seems the headlight
    is operating as it should.

    I'm convinced the problem was that faulty switch, probably with internal parts rattling around enough to occasionally toggle that A to C or A to
    B contact. I suspect it will work fine if I successfully reassemble it without the switch.

    It's still slightly worrisome, because a headlight really does have to
    be reliable. Maybe I'll carry a little battery light as a spare for a
    while. I often do that anyway when night riding with others, because of
    so many incidents of other folks' headlights failing on rides.

    Who on earth to you ride with that have light failures? I’ve never had a light fail on the ride, I’ve had in the early days ooh batteries is a bit tired as the light dims as the battery can’t hold the voltage any more, and had cheap lights mounts and so on start to wear.

    I still have multiple lights that I’ve upgraded from which still work, but time and technology has moved on.

    Likewise I see a lot of bikes, and meet up with folks for a Wednesday night ride, most weeks it’s not a thing that is common, it’s not impossible but definitely rare.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Rolf Mantel on Fri Apr 11 09:49:41 2025
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 11.04.2025 um 03:56 schrieb Jeff Liebermann:
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:35:15 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
    wrote:

    Am 08.04.2025 um 22:12 schrieb sms:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used.  However, it's >>>>> not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's >>>> not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed
    control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company >>>> has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when >>>> all you have on is the daytime running light.

    "No" is a not quite correct, "extremely rare" would describe the market
    better.
    <https://nabendynamo.de/produkte/scheinwerfer/ladelux/>

    Slightly more common: a "dynamo driven power supply" produces power to a >>> USE output, and theoretially you can route that USB power into your bikt >>> light but with no fine-tuned optimization the output is too low to make
    it worthwhile in any sense.

    This article shows 26 such bicycle USB chargers. That seems to be a
    popular use for bicycle dynamos.
    <https://www.cyclingabout.com/list-of-hub-dynamo-power-supplies-for-usb-devices/>

    Sure, it's common to use a bike dynamo to charge low-power devices.
    Charging mobile phones barely works because many phones stop charging on
    a variable power supply.

    Even so it’s quite a power hungry device at least smart phones, so would
    need to be cycling at sufficient speed for enough time, and phones
    throttling of the charge rate as it probably believes it’s connected to a faulty power supply, hence folks use of power banks, which also would have
    the advantages of not needing to charge and cable up devices on the move.

    I have no direct knowledge of anybody using a dynamo to top up their
    battery lights.

    Considering that the batteries in lights are quite a bit larger capacity
    and the device is even more power intensive, and generally can charge back
    up relatively quickly, I don’t see much use for it, I get that be a few
    folks who’d like the idea of it but can’t see a good use for it.

    Even the folks doing a hr or more commute, the lights last multiple days
    even in winter and charge it up over night when it’s getting low, or even
    at work!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to sms on Fri Apr 11 09:52:03 2025
    sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
    On 4/9/2025 10:04 AM, AMuzi wrote:

    I'm with Mr White on that. None of my dynamo systems have switches and
    haven't since I wired past my first failed one in 1972.
    Switches, especially low-voltage switches are prone to failure.

    But higher-end dynamo lights will often have multiple modes that require
    a switch but it is often handlebar mounted.

    For a mid-cost, switchless, dynamo light, I recommend the 100 Lux
    H-Black Pro Dynamo <https://herrmans.eu/products/front-lights-4147/dynamo-10038/h-black-pro-dynamo/>
    for about $50 <https://www.bike24.com/p2214107.html>.

    It's a lot better than the low-cost dynamo lights at 20-40 lux. I bought
    one in 2017 for €62,94 so they come down in price.

    Not the latest in LED efficiency, but more than adequate, and the optics
    are very good.

    A lot of people don't realize how vitally important the optics are in
    bicycle lighting, especially in dynamo lights where you only have a few
    watts of power to work with.

    I’d of thought that the folks buying lights in the above price ranges would do at least to some degree after all could just buy some cheap almost disposable lights as some folks do! But they are choosing to buy expensive lights.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Fri Apr 11 07:30:56 2025
    On 11 Apr 2025 09:15:40 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 8:56 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    The switch is the tiny white box toward the bottom of this photo:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-
    public/ just below "3R 46 16V" which is probably a capacitor. The black
    pushbutton sticks out downward in the photo (or backwards, in the
    mounted headlight) and looks odd in the photo, again because of
    reflections. That switch is about 4.5mm x 2.5mm x 1.8mm tall. I removed
    the switch from the circuit board.

    I had assumed it was a toggle, but it seems instead to be a momentary
    switch. It connects to five tiny solder pads. The two big ones, at the
    "bottom" of the switch in the photo, are just for fastening it to the
    board. At the "top" face in the photo are three very tiny pads, call
    them A, B and C.

    Playing with a jumper wire ending in two sharp pins, I found that
    momentary contact from A to C changed the state of the light, on to off
    to back on, etc. A to B did the same. I had to be careful to touch
    fairly quickly and not bounce.

    At last check, the light is in "on" state. I think if I don't disturb
    things, it should stay in that state, and I can try reassembling and
    testing it on the bike. I've got other stuff to work on tonight, so I'll >>> get back to it tomorrow.

    More bench testing this morning. The headlamp started right up,
    perfectly consistently when driven by the dynamo spun with my drill
    press. Momentarily jumping A to C (or B) of those switch solder pads
    toggled the lamp on or off while running the dynamo. Shutting down the
    dynamo put the lamp into "standlight" mode. In that mode, with no
    voltage input, jumping A to C turned off the standlight. Applying power
    turned the lamp back on, no switching necessary. It seems the headlight
    is operating as it should.

    I'm convinced the problem was that faulty switch, probably with internal
    parts rattling around enough to occasionally toggle that A to C or A to
    B contact. I suspect it will work fine if I successfully reassemble it
    without the switch.

    It's still slightly worrisome, because a headlight really does have to
    be reliable. Maybe I'll carry a little battery light as a spare for a
    while. I often do that anyway when night riding with others, because of
    so many incidents of other folks' headlights failing on rides.

    Who on earth to you ride with that have light failures? Ive never had a >light fail on the ride, Ive had in the early days ooh batteries is a bit >tired as the light dims as the battery cant hold the voltage any more, and >had cheap lights mounts and so on start to wear.

    I still have multiple lights that Ive upgraded from which still work, but >time and technology has moved on.

    Likewise I see a lot of bikes, and meet up with folks for a Wednesday night >ride, most weeks its not a thing that is common, its not impossible but >definitely rare.

    Roger Merriman

    Krygowski is, of course, refering to some of his imaginary friends who
    crop up whenever he needs to pretend that he has a lot of followers
    who couldn't possibly survive without his assistance.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Fri Apr 11 07:39:23 2025
    On 11 Apr 2025 09:49:41 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 11.04.2025 um 03:56 schrieb Jeff Liebermann:
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:35:15 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
    wrote:

    Am 08.04.2025 um 22:12 schrieb sms:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used. However, it's >>>>>> not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's >>>>> not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed >>>>> control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company >>>>> has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W >>>>> from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when >>>>> all you have on is the daytime running light.

    "No" is a not quite correct, "extremely rare" would describe the market >>>> better.
    <https://nabendynamo.de/produkte/scheinwerfer/ladelux/>

    Slightly more common: a "dynamo driven power supply" produces power to a >>>> USE output, and theoretially you can route that USB power into your bikt >>>> light but with no fine-tuned optimization the output is too low to make >>>> it worthwhile in any sense.

    This article shows 26 such bicycle USB chargers. That seems to be a
    popular use for bicycle dynamos.
    <https://www.cyclingabout.com/list-of-hub-dynamo-power-supplies-for-usb-devices/>

    Sure, it's common to use a bike dynamo to charge low-power devices.
    Charging mobile phones barely works because many phones stop charging on
    a variable power supply.

    Even so its quite a power hungry device at least smart phones, so would
    need to be cycling at sufficient speed for enough time, and phones
    throttling of the charge rate as it probably believes its connected to a >faulty power supply, hence folks use of power banks, which also would have >the advantages of not needing to charge and cable up devices on the move.

    I have no direct knowledge of anybody using a dynamo to top up their
    battery lights.

    Considering that the batteries in lights are quite a bit larger capacity
    and the device is even more power intensive, and generally can charge back
    up relatively quickly, I dont see much use for it, I get that be a few
    folks whod like the idea of it but cant see a good use for it.

    Even the folks doing a hr or more commute, the lights last multiple days
    even in winter and charge it up over night when its getting low, or even
    at work!

    Roger Merriman

    +1

    Makes sense to me even though I have no use for lights on my bike. I
    used to carry double or triple "A" head and tail lights in case I got
    caught out after dark, but they were trashcanned many years ago. My
    70/80 mile 7 hour bike rides are only distant memories.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Fri Apr 11 10:31:08 2025
    On 4/11/2025 4:15 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 8:56 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    The switch is the tiny white box toward the bottom of this photo:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-
    public/ just below "3R 46 16V" which is probably a capacitor. The black
    pushbutton sticks out downward in the photo (or backwards, in the
    mounted headlight) and looks odd in the photo, again because of
    reflections. That switch is about 4.5mm x 2.5mm x 1.8mm tall. I removed
    the switch from the circuit board.

    I had assumed it was a toggle, but it seems instead to be a momentary
    switch. It connects to five tiny solder pads. The two big ones, at the
    "bottom" of the switch in the photo, are just for fastening it to the
    board. At the "top" face in the photo are three very tiny pads, call
    them A, B and C.

    Playing with a jumper wire ending in two sharp pins, I found that
    momentary contact from A to C changed the state of the light, on to off
    to back on, etc. A to B did the same. I had to be careful to touch
    fairly quickly and not bounce.

    At last check, the light is in "on" state. I think if I don't disturb
    things, it should stay in that state, and I can try reassembling and
    testing it on the bike. I've got other stuff to work on tonight, so I'll >>> get back to it tomorrow.

    More bench testing this morning. The headlamp started right up,
    perfectly consistently when driven by the dynamo spun with my drill
    press. Momentarily jumping A to C (or B) of those switch solder pads
    toggled the lamp on or off while running the dynamo. Shutting down the
    dynamo put the lamp into "standlight" mode. In that mode, with no
    voltage input, jumping A to C turned off the standlight. Applying power
    turned the lamp back on, no switching necessary. It seems the headlight
    is operating as it should.

    I'm convinced the problem was that faulty switch, probably with internal
    parts rattling around enough to occasionally toggle that A to C or A to
    B contact. I suspect it will work fine if I successfully reassemble it
    without the switch.

    It's still slightly worrisome, because a headlight really does have to
    be reliable. Maybe I'll carry a little battery light as a spare for a
    while. I often do that anyway when night riding with others, because of
    so many incidents of other folks' headlights failing on rides.

    Who on earth to you ride with that have light failures? I’ve never had a light fail on the ride, I’ve had in the early days ooh batteries is a bit tired as the light dims as the battery can’t hold the voltage any more, and had cheap lights mounts and so on start to wear.

    I still have multiple lights that I’ve upgraded from which still work, but time and technology has moved on.

    Likewise I see a lot of bikes, and meet up with folks for a Wednesday night ride, most weeks it’s not a thing that is common, it’s not impossible but definitely rare.

    Roger Merriman


    I have had light failures. Mine run incandescent globes not
    LEDs. Those fail at about 8~10 years. Those bikes have been
    1/2 year daily rides, that is, a winter bike and a summer bike.


    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to news@hartig-mantel.de on Fri Apr 11 08:58:44 2025
    On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:04:00 +0200, Rolf Mantel
    <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:

    Am 11.04.2025 um 03:56 schrieb Jeff Liebermann:
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:35:15 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
    wrote:

    Am 08.04.2025 um 22:12 schrieb sms:
    On 4/7/2025 5:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Not going below 0V is the most common way PWM is used. However, it's >>>>> not mandatory or the only way:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation>
    Note that the waveform shown goes below 0V.
    Yeah, that is true, it's possible for PWM to go below zero, but that's >>>> not the way it's normally used for LED light dimming or PWM fan speed
    control.

    With LED bicycle lights, it's surprising that no bicycle light company >>>> has a dynamo input into their battery powered lights. Even at only 3W
    from the dynamo, you could power a high-end bicycle light at lower
    power, and you could be charging the battery during daytime rides when >>>> all you have on is the daytime running light.

    "No" is a not quite correct, "extremely rare" would describe the market
    better.
    <https://nabendynamo.de/produkte/scheinwerfer/ladelux/>

    Slightly more common: a "dynamo driven power supply" produces power to a >>> USE output, and theoretially you can route that USB power into your bikt >>> light but with no fine-tuned optimization the output is too low to make
    it worthwhile in any sense.

    This article shows 26 such bicycle USB chargers. That seems to be a
    popular use for bicycle dynamos.
    <https://www.cyclingabout.com/list-of-hub-dynamo-power-supplies-for-usb-devices/>

    Sure, it's common to use a bike dynamo to charge low-power devices.

    I keep seeing advertisements showing a smartphone on the handlebars,
    with the backlighting at full brightness, and running some kind of
    bicycle related performance, mapping or GPS application. With a 3
    watt dynamo, that's not going to work well.

    Does anyone want me to grind the numbers and calculate the runtime for
    various configurations? It's easy to do, but I'm short on time for a
    few more days (or weeks).

    Charging mobile phones barely works because many phones stop charging on
    a variable power supply.

    I have no direct knowledge of anybody using a dynamo to top up their
    battery lights.

    I also have no knowledge of anyone using such a device. If dynamo
    powered USB chargers were so rare, then the device manufacturers need
    to improve their market research before releasing products that nobody
    will buy.

    The CyclingAbout article also mentions installing a buffer battery to
    extend the operating time of dynamo powered lights: <https://www.cyclingabout.com/buffer-batteries-pass-through-charging-dynamo-hub-systems/>
    I usually ask myself what problem the manufacturer is trying to solve.
    By adding a buffer battery, it's probably (my guess) that the rider is
    not moving fast enough to provide enough power for a dynamo powered
    light, or that a super-capacitor doesn't store enough energy
    (watt-hrs) to be useful on short rides.

    I tend to have each of my devices (smartphone, eWatch, front bicycle
    light, rear bicycle light, bicycle computer(?), etc with their own
    individual batteries. The problem is that they all take different
    batteries and the only thing they have in common is that they can be
    charged with USB. I haven't done this for many years, but if I were
    to ride with the gadgets I have today, I would need a junk bag full of
    AAA, AA, 18650, A123, and CR2032 or CR2016 coin cells. Except for the
    coin cells, all of these a LiIon rechargeable cells.



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Apr 11 16:44:38 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 4:15 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/8/2025 8:56 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    The switch is the tiny white box toward the bottom of this photo:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/16972296@N08/54435279894/in/dateposted-
    public/ just below "3R 46 16V" which is probably a capacitor. The black >>>> pushbutton sticks out downward in the photo (or backwards, in the
    mounted headlight) and looks odd in the photo, again because of
    reflections. That switch is about 4.5mm x 2.5mm x 1.8mm tall. I removed >>>> the switch from the circuit board.

    I had assumed it was a toggle, but it seems instead to be a momentary
    switch. It connects to five tiny solder pads. The two big ones, at the >>>> "bottom" of the switch in the photo, are just for fastening it to the
    board. At the "top" face in the photo are three very tiny pads, call
    them A, B and C.

    Playing with a jumper wire ending in two sharp pins, I found that
    momentary contact from A to C changed the state of the light, on to off >>>> to back on, etc. A to B did the same. I had to be careful to touch
    fairly quickly and not bounce.

    At last check, the light is in "on" state. I think if I don't disturb
    things, it should stay in that state, and I can try reassembling and
    testing it on the bike. I've got other stuff to work on tonight, so I'll >>>> get back to it tomorrow.

    More bench testing this morning. The headlamp started right up,
    perfectly consistently when driven by the dynamo spun with my drill
    press. Momentarily jumping A to C (or B) of those switch solder pads
    toggled the lamp on or off while running the dynamo. Shutting down the
    dynamo put the lamp into "standlight" mode. In that mode, with no
    voltage input, jumping A to C turned off the standlight. Applying power
    turned the lamp back on, no switching necessary. It seems the headlight
    is operating as it should.

    I'm convinced the problem was that faulty switch, probably with internal >>> parts rattling around enough to occasionally toggle that A to C or A to
    B contact. I suspect it will work fine if I successfully reassemble it
    without the switch.

    It's still slightly worrisome, because a headlight really does have to
    be reliable. Maybe I'll carry a little battery light as a spare for a
    while. I often do that anyway when night riding with others, because of
    so many incidents of other folks' headlights failing on rides.

    Who on earth to you ride with that have light failures? I’ve never had a >> light fail on the ride, I’ve had in the early days ooh batteries is a bit >> tired as the light dims as the battery can’t hold the voltage any more, and
    had cheap lights mounts and so on start to wear.

    I still have multiple lights that I’ve upgraded from which still work, but >> time and technology has moved on.

    Likewise I see a lot of bikes, and meet up with folks for a Wednesday night >> ride, most weeks it’s not a thing that is common, it’s not impossible but
    definitely rare.

    Roger Merriman


    I have had light failures. Mine run incandescent globes not
    LEDs. Those fail at about 8~10 years. Those bikes have been
    1/2 year daily rides, that is, a winter bike and a summer bike.



    Which rather proves my point really both you and Frank are outliers in this regard! With incandescent being rather rarer than Dynamos, I don’t recall seeing any for a very long time!

    AA/AAA lights aren’t that common being supplemented by USB or coin battery powered lights, though do see them still.

    In the Uk every ready lights where the ones folks of my generation remember wasn’t terribly useful but nostalgia is like that!

    I rode my old MTB from the 90’s which was similar experience few years
    back!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Apr 11 17:37:59 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 5:52 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

    A lot of people don't realize how vitally important the optics are in
    bicycle lighting, especially in dynamo lights where you only have a few
    watts of power to work with.

    I’d of thought that the folks buying lights in the above price ranges would
    do at least to some degree after all could just buy some cheap almost
    disposable lights as some folks do! But they are choosing to buy expensive >> lights.

    Mr. Scharf's statement is correct. Optics are important, and not only
    for dynamo lights. I've been saying that for many, many years. It makes
    no sense to waste half of a headlight's output in directions that you
    never need to see.

    Which bike lights do ie the beam is shaped bar the very cheap coil cell/usb stuff.

    I think only a small percentage of cyclists are aware of the importance
    of optics. I think almost all cyclists get their "education" (such as it
    is) from product advertisements. And ever since white LEDs began their
    rapid rise in lumen output, lumen counts have been the almost exclusive message in advertisements

    I believe most of the bike lights manufacturers have always used lenses to greater or lesser degree, was a period when some of the Chinese led lights/torches that where lumens only and not true figures!


    That's led to nonsense like lights for road bikes that blind oncoming
    road users, or otherwise waste lumens shooting them skyward. We've even
    seen arguments in this discussion group, long and furious, that one
    _must_ have a simplistic perfectly round headlight beam, because
    otherwise a road rider would be sure to run into a low hanging branch
    and injure his head.

    A higher beam certainly can have its uses even in town, certainly as a high beam mode, though certainly the MTB lights I use aren’t round beam but shaped.

    Again that’s older stuff at least a decade ago if not two! and even then
    was the “cheap” stuff.

    (Yes, really. And apparently those making that argument were not joking.
    Go figure.)


    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Apr 11 14:07:19 2025
    On 4/11/2025 1:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 12:44 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 4:15 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:

    I have had light failures.  Mine run incandescent globes not
    LEDs. Those fail at about 8~10 years.  Those bikes have been
    1/2 year daily rides, that is, a winter bike and a summer bike.

    Which rather proves my point really both you and Frank are outliers in
    this
    regard! With incandescent being rather rarer than Dynamos, I don’t recall >> seeing any for a very long time!

    AA/AAA lights aren’t that common being supplemented by USB or coin
    battery
    powered lights, though do see them still.

    I probably still own some AA powered halogen headlights, mostly because
    I seldom throw away anything remotely useful. Yes, it's a personal
    fault.

    Here's some vindication for you:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Fw7bZoPyVU



    But for actual riding, I switched to LEDs many years ago.

    I've used generator powered lights since about 1977, experimenting back
    then to improve light output (when others were charging lead acid
    batteries to power MR spotlight bulbs) even though good quality stock
    units were fine for my uses. But when high output LED dynamo headlights
    came on the market, I bought them and considered the problem solved.

    Since then, the LEDs have gotten brighter, but I've seen no reason to
    chase every incremental improvement. The headlights I use light up
    street signs 1/4 mile away, so they must be visible to motorists half a
    mile away. They give me plenty of illumination of the roadway, and light
    it better than the headlights of my friends. That's good enough for me.

    Similarly, the fact one can buy a 16 pound bicycle doesn't mean everyone
    with 18 pound bicycles must trade up. Not even those with 26 pound
    bicycles. What matter is whether one's equipment meets their needs, not whether it's the latest, greatest technology.




    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Apr 11 19:24:44 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 1:37 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    I think only a small percentage of cyclists are aware of the importance
    of optics. I think almost all cyclists get their "education" (such as it >>> is) from product advertisements. And ever since white LEDs began their
    rapid rise in lumen output, lumen counts have been the almost exclusive
    message in advertisements

    I believe most of the bike lights manufacturers have always used lenses to >> greater or lesser degree, was a period when some of the Chinese led
    lights/torches that where lumens only and not true figures!
    I don't think that's true at all. Take a look at some of the beam shots
    at this site: https://bikelightdatabase.com/beamshots

    Or go to https://road.cc/content/feature/roadcc-front-bike-lights-beam-test-310999
    and look at the beam shapes of the Ravemen and the Knog.

    Both of which have shaped beams, Raveman and Knog both claim road specific beams and reviews tend in Road.cc and others mention this, Raveman make lot
    out of their High and low beams, though they are far from the first to do
    that sort of thing!

    I get why they do this, but a camera isn’t an eye and it’s rather false if not misleading to use beam shots.

    My bike lights have quite different beam shapes and output and photograph
    quite differently due to that.

    In the past few years, there's been more attention to optics, but I
    think there are still plenty of small manufacturers who use rotationally symmetrical optics. Peter White has an explanation of why those are far
    from optimum, at https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/plight.php


    Very small low powered mini lights and importers of very cheap frankly junk
    all others seems to be shaped to some degree.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Apr 11 19:39:04 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 12:44 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 4:15 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:

    I have had light failures. Mine run incandescent globes not
    LEDs. Those fail at about 8~10 years. Those bikes have been
    1/2 year daily rides, that is, a winter bike and a summer bike.

    Which rather proves my point really both you and Frank are outliers in this >> regard! With incandescent being rather rarer than Dynamos, I don’t recall >> seeing any for a very long time!

    AA/AAA lights aren’t that common being supplemented by USB or coin battery >> powered lights, though do see them still.

    I probably still own some AA powered halogen headlights, mostly because
    I seldom throw away anything remotely useful. Yes, it's a personal
    fault. But for actual riding, I switched to LEDs many years ago.

    I've used generator powered lights since about 1977, experimenting back
    then to improve light output (when others were charging lead acid
    batteries to power MR spotlight bulbs) even though good quality stock
    units were fine for my uses. But when high output LED dynamo headlights
    came on the market, I bought them and considered the problem solved.

    Since then, the LEDs have gotten brighter, but I've seen no reason to
    chase every incremental improvement. The headlights I use light up
    street signs 1/4 mile away, so they must be visible to motorists half a
    mile away. They give me plenty of illumination of the roadway, and light
    it better than the headlights of my friends. That's good enough for me.

    My lights haven’t particularly got brighter In fact the old Strada is about half the power of the light it replaced on the commute, but it’s much
    better designed, it has a low power flat traffic friendly beam, or one can switch it via the remote to the high power which adds in the spot as well
    which as well as just more light is a well higher beam shape, which is
    useful, and unlike lights of its era doesn’t need to cycle though flash or off modes to switch modes.

    Ie it’s a lot more liveable with, and has an easy traffic light plus run
    time timer so easy to know as and when one should charge it.

    Similarly, the fact one can buy a 16 pound bicycle doesn't mean everyone
    with 18 pound bicycles must trade up. Not even those with 26 pound
    bicycles. What matter is whether one's equipment meets their needs, not whether it's the latest, greatest technology.


    Not aware that anyone is in this thread is!

    I am vaguely toying with idea some of the lights that can auto dip, for the
    old school roadie, as the remote doesn’t easily fit near one’s hands on that bike, but it’s light even early now so unlikely to be honest.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Sat Apr 12 08:25:09 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 3:24 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    [about headlight beam optics, generating "specially shaped beams":]
    I don't think that's true at all. Take a look at some of the beam shots
    at this site: https://bikelightdatabase.com/beamshots

    Or go to
    https://road.cc/content/feature/roadcc-front-bike-lights-beam-test-310999 >>> and look at the beam shapes of the Ravemen and the Knog.

    Both of which have shaped beams, Raveman and Knog both claim road specific >> beams and reviews tend in Road.cc and others mention this, Raveman make lot >> out of their High and low beams, though they are far from the first to do
    that sort of thing!

    I get why they do this, but a camera isn’t an eye and it’s rather false if
    not misleading to use beam shots.

    I think you and I have different definitions of beam shapes, and
    different standards. (Andrew will be thinking "Of course!")

    But the beams shown for the Raveman and Knog are rotationally symmetric.
    That can be called "specially shaped" only in comparison to totally
    random shapes, or to a light source with no focus at all.


    Don’t trust road.cc beam engine it’s like others trying to simplify and the eye perception is very different to a camera.

    Try lights one knows and have used and compare if one wishes to test it.
    Note also they are not testing at different power levels which in number of lights will change the beam shape, ie on high it will have a higher beam
    shape vs low, the Strada I have very much has this, and they have clearly
    only tested on high.

    Raveman in particular make a thing about having a T shaped beam which is
    anti glare they claim.

    And this is backed up by reviews of their lights including Road.cc

    Will it be as cut off and low as a StVZO light? Or even the Exposure Strada which I have old version? No i suspect not but does appear to have some attempts to angle and shape the beam.

    Here's a good article on beam design that highlights the shortcoming of
    a round beam for road use. https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth-14-more-lumens-make-a-better-light/ Essentially, the illumination of the road surface can't be uniform. It's closest to uniform if you're wasting half the light above the road
    surface. Otherwise it generates hot spots that are detrimental to your
    night vision. A properly designed beam will do a much better job of
    giving uniform illumination and will better show road contours,
    obstacles, potholes, rocks etc. The information is much the same as the
    Peter White article below, but with graphics that may make the ideas
    more clear.

    In the past few years, there's been more attention to optics, but I
    think there are still plenty of small manufacturers who use rotationally >>> symmetrical optics. Peter White has an explanation of why those are far
    from optimum, at https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/plight.php




    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Apr 16 05:39:47 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 11:29 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    The light now works. I tried it on a short test ride last night.

    I do like that headlight. Since the non-switch version is now only $35
    from Peter White, I plan to buy another to upgrade the headlight on my
    folding bike.

    Final report: A friend and I did a two hour ride late Sunday night. The generator and the headlight performed very well, no problems.

    The headlight's mate arrived by mail last night. It will be going on one
    of the folding bikes.


    Has spurred me into spending my light or rather the old (ish) one I use for
    the commute to get fixed the mount will not tighten I had a crash with it
    years ago and it’s never been right since!

    But will not tighten beyond finger tight so while it doesn’t move just on
    the bike will move if you use the switch be that to turn on/off or just
    mode.

    And as ever the quote is quite reasonable! Less than £20 I believe though
    they haven’t received it yet.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Apr 16 15:43:28 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/16/2025 1:39 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 11:29 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    Final report: A friend and I did a two hour ride late Sunday night. The
    generator and the headlight performed very well, no problems.

    The headlight's mate arrived by mail last night. It will be going on one >>> of the folding bikes.


    Has spurred me into spending my light or rather the old (ish) one I use for >> the commute to get fixed the mount will not tighten I had a crash with it
    years ago and it’s never been right since!
    BTW, that illustrates a maintenance problem I frequently encounter.
    While I'm on the bike, some problem or other will annoy me, as in "I've
    got to fix that squeak when I get home."

    But when I park the bike, it naturally doesn't squeak (or whatever) so I forget about it until the next time I'm riding the bike. :-/


    Your post plus as it was winter I’ve being using the light on the old
    school roadie on early starts, and that the remote doesn’t fit naturally to the bars, and certainly nowhere just to hand like the MTB derived commuter,
    so I’ve been toggling the beam from High to low using the switch on the light, and so have noticed it moving slightly.

    Clearly still works in that it’s not going to fall off but it’s tipped into this is really quite annoying from Meh! Such as one of the old rear lights
    that does occasionally loose connections and go dim, but as rear lights are such a tedious bits of kit I run two on the commute bikes, and that light definitely isn’t worth repairing.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Wed Apr 16 13:19:42 2025
    On 16 Apr 2025 15:43:28 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/16/2025 1:39 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 11:29 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    Final report: A friend and I did a two hour ride late Sunday night. The >>>> generator and the headlight performed very well, no problems.

    The headlight's mate arrived by mail last night. It will be going on one >>>> of the folding bikes.


    Has spurred me into spending my light or rather the old (ish) one I use for >>> the commute to get fixed the mount will not tighten I had a crash with it >>> years ago and its never been right since!
    BTW, that illustrates a maintenance problem I frequently encounter.
    While I'm on the bike, some problem or other will annoy me, as in "I've
    got to fix that squeak when I get home."

    But when I park the bike, it naturally doesn't squeak (or whatever) so I
    forget about it until the next time I'm riding the bike. :-/


    Your post plus as it was winter Ive being using the light on the old
    school roadie on early starts, and that the remote doesnt fit naturally to >the bars, and certainly nowhere just to hand like the MTB derived commuter, >so Ive been toggling the beam from High to low using the switch on the >light, and so have noticed it moving slightly.

    Clearly still works in that its not going to fall off but its tipped into >this is really quite annoying from Meh! Such as one of the old rear lights >that does occasionally loose connections and go dim, but as rear lights are >such a tedious bits of kit I run two on the commute bikes, and that light >definitely isnt worth repairing.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't need any lights, but for other maintenance issues, I carry a
    lot of tools and I'm inclined to stop in some shade and fix or try to
    fix whatever is not working right. I also carry a huge amount of tools
    in my truck, including a vice, and what I cannot fix while out on a
    ride is likely to under the wrench before I drive home. I am the
    opposite of a procrastinator. My wife serves that function at our
    home.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Catrike Ryder on Wed Apr 16 20:48:28 2025
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 16 Apr 2025 15:43:28 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/16/2025 1:39 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 11:29 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    Final report: A friend and I did a two hour ride late Sunday night. The >>>>> generator and the headlight performed very well, no problems.

    The headlight's mate arrived by mail last night. It will be going on one >>>>> of the folding bikes.


    Has spurred me into spending my light or rather the old (ish) one I use for
    the commute to get fixed the mount will not tighten I had a crash with it >>>> years ago and it’s never been right since!
    BTW, that illustrates a maintenance problem I frequently encounter.
    While I'm on the bike, some problem or other will annoy me, as in "I've
    got to fix that squeak when I get home."

    But when I park the bike, it naturally doesn't squeak (or whatever) so I >>> forget about it until the next time I'm riding the bike. :-/


    Your post plus as it was winter I’ve being using the light on the old
    school roadie on early starts, and that the remote doesn’t fit naturally to >> the bars, and certainly nowhere just to hand like the MTB derived commuter, >> so I’ve been toggling the beam from High to low using the switch on the
    light, and so have noticed it moving slightly.

    Clearly still works in that it’s not going to fall off but it’s tipped into
    this is really quite annoying from Meh! Such as one of the old rear lights >> that does occasionally loose connections and go dim, but as rear lights are >> such a tedious bits of kit I run two on the commute bikes, and that light
    definitely isn’t worth repairing.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't need any lights, but for other maintenance issues, I carry a
    lot of tools and I'm inclined to stop in some shade and fix or try to
    fix whatever is not working right. I also carry a huge amount of tools
    in my truck, including a vice, and what I cannot fix while out on a
    ride is likely to under the wrench before I drive home. I am the
    opposite of a procrastinator. My wife serves that function at our
    home.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    This will require rather a lot of disassembly, as it’s the cleat and it’s bolt and the nut it screws into, which is the mostly likely culprit to be damaged as the bolt threads looked visually fine.

    So likely to require rather a lot of dissembling! I’m assuming they would need to take the inner electronics (likely to be by some margin more
    complex than Frank’s lamb) plus batteries out, to then get at the nut from inside the case.

    They started off making kit for divers/cavers then MTBers so durable kit
    that can be repaired is very much there thing.

    And it’s the new bike that and using it during winter when I needed a light to see by, that it became apparent that it was getting worse, and the
    problem was highlighted.

    But it didn’t stop the light working, it still worked fine so certainly during winter when it’s by far the best tool for the job I was reluctant to be without it, but since I’m now commuting even early in daylight and
    Franks thread reminded me seemed the time to do so, I’d hope to get it back last next week or so.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Wed Apr 16 17:41:30 2025
    On 16 Apr 2025 20:48:28 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 16 Apr 2025 15:43:28 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/16/2025 1:39 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 11:29 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    Final report: A friend and I did a two hour ride late Sunday night. The >>>>>> generator and the headlight performed very well, no problems.

    The headlight's mate arrived by mail last night. It will be going on one >>>>>> of the folding bikes.


    Has spurred me into spending my light or rather the old (ish) one I use for
    the commute to get fixed the mount will not tighten I had a crash with it >>>>> years ago and it?s never been right since!
    BTW, that illustrates a maintenance problem I frequently encounter.
    While I'm on the bike, some problem or other will annoy me, as in "I've >>>> got to fix that squeak when I get home."

    But when I park the bike, it naturally doesn't squeak (or whatever) so I >>>> forget about it until the next time I'm riding the bike. :-/


    Your post plus as it was winter I?ve being using the light on the old
    school roadie on early starts, and that the remote doesn?t fit naturally to >>> the bars, and certainly nowhere just to hand like the MTB derived commuter, >>> so I?ve been toggling the beam from High to low using the switch on the
    light, and so have noticed it moving slightly.

    Clearly still works in that it?s not going to fall off but it?s tipped into >>> this is really quite annoying from Meh! Such as one of the old rear lights >>> that does occasionally loose connections and go dim, but as rear lights are >>> such a tedious bits of kit I run two on the commute bikes, and that light >>> definitely isn?t worth repairing.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't need any lights, but for other maintenance issues, I carry a
    lot of tools and I'm inclined to stop in some shade and fix or try to
    fix whatever is not working right. I also carry a huge amount of tools
    in my truck, including a vice, and what I cannot fix while out on a
    ride is likely to under the wrench before I drive home. I am the
    opposite of a procrastinator. My wife serves that function at our
    home.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    This will require rather a lot of disassembly, as its the cleat and its >bolt and the nut it screws into, which is the mostly likely culprit to be >damaged as the bolt threads looked visually fine.

    So likely to require rather a lot of dissembling! Im assuming they would >need to take the inner electronics (likely to be by some margin more
    complex than Franks lamb) plus batteries out, to then get at the nut from >inside the case.

    They started off making kit for divers/cavers then MTBers so durable kit
    that can be repaired is very much there thing.

    And its the new bike that and using it during winter when I needed a light >to see by, that it became apparent that it was getting worse, and the
    problem was highlighted.

    But it didnt stop the light working, it still worked fine so certainly >during winter when its by far the best tool for the job I was reluctant to >be without it, but since Im now commuting even early in daylight and
    Franks thread reminded me seemed the time to do so, Id hope to get it back >last next week or so.

    Roger Merriman

    I love my electronics and electrics but I have no interest in
    disassembling them to work on them. They're mostly inexpensive enough
    to be easily replaced. I recently shitcanned a bike computer that
    didn't work right. I have an older bike computer that works fine but
    got replaced by one with more functionality. I prefer the mechanical
    aspects of bike maintenence.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Catrike Ryder on Wed Apr 16 22:28:50 2025
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 16 Apr 2025 20:48:28 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 16 Apr 2025 15:43:28 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/16/2025 1:39 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 4/11/2025 11:29 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    Final report: A friend and I did a two hour ride late Sunday night. The >>>>>>> generator and the headlight performed very well, no problems.

    The headlight's mate arrived by mail last night. It will be going on one
    of the folding bikes.


    Has spurred me into spending my light or rather the old (ish) one I use for
    the commute to get fixed the mount will not tighten I had a crash with it
    years ago and it?s never been right since!
    BTW, that illustrates a maintenance problem I frequently encounter.
    While I'm on the bike, some problem or other will annoy me, as in "I've >>>>> got to fix that squeak when I get home."

    But when I park the bike, it naturally doesn't squeak (or whatever) so I >>>>> forget about it until the next time I'm riding the bike. :-/


    Your post plus as it was winter I?ve being using the light on the old
    school roadie on early starts, and that the remote doesn?t fit naturally to
    the bars, and certainly nowhere just to hand like the MTB derived commuter,
    so I?ve been toggling the beam from High to low using the switch on the >>>> light, and so have noticed it moving slightly.

    Clearly still works in that it?s not going to fall off but it?s tipped into
    this is really quite annoying from Meh! Such as one of the old rear lights >>>> that does occasionally loose connections and go dim, but as rear lights are
    such a tedious bits of kit I run two on the commute bikes, and that light >>>> definitely isn?t worth repairing.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't need any lights, but for other maintenance issues, I carry a
    lot of tools and I'm inclined to stop in some shade and fix or try to
    fix whatever is not working right. I also carry a huge amount of tools
    in my truck, including a vice, and what I cannot fix while out on a
    ride is likely to under the wrench before I drive home. I am the
    opposite of a procrastinator. My wife serves that function at our
    home.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    This will require rather a lot of disassembly, as it’s the cleat and it’s >> bolt and the nut it screws into, which is the mostly likely culprit to be
    damaged as the bolt threads looked visually fine.

    So likely to require rather a lot of dissembling! I’m assuming they would >> need to take the inner electronics (likely to be by some margin more
    complex than Frank’s lamb) plus batteries out, to then get at the nut from >> inside the case.

    They started off making kit for divers/cavers then MTBers so durable kit
    that can be repaired is very much there thing.

    And it’s the new bike that and using it during winter when I needed a light >> to see by, that it became apparent that it was getting worse, and the
    problem was highlighted.

    But it didn’t stop the light working, it still worked fine so certainly
    during winter when it’s by far the best tool for the job I was reluctant to >> be without it, but since I’m now commuting even early in daylight and
    Franks thread reminded me seemed the time to do so, I’d hope to get it back >> last next week or so.

    Roger Merriman

    I love my electronics and electrics but I have no interest in
    disassembling them to work on them. They're mostly inexpensive enough
    to be easily replaced. I recently shitcanned a bike computer that
    didn't work right. I have an older bike computer that works fine but
    got replaced by one with more functionality. I prefer the mechanical
    aspects of bike maintenence.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman


    Exposure lights are i suspect an outlier in that the kit is repairable, and they repair the kit, vs as some companies do just offer a discount on a new one, there kit is also definitely on the expensive side which is likely to
    be another reason!

    Back in the day some folks used to buy new batteries for various Garmin’s can’t say I heard of it since? Maybe still happens though since my old unit still seems to last even for long rides ie 7/8 hrs or more and still has
    plenty of battery life kinda a non issue.

    But I guess back to point lots of electronic devices aren’t routinely repairable more black boxes, had mates whose derailleur (electronic) have
    just crapped out which is rather disappointing considering their price!

    I’m not saying I’ve not had mechanical mech’s fail I think last year had one come apart on the commute home which was a first for me! But it was
    cheap and relatively high mileage though still bur-mused by it! But
    certainly not an expensive fix.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)