• Handlebars and other regulatory issues

    From AMuzi@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 24 15:38:44 2025
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-uci-compliant-and-we-dont-care/
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Jun 25 11:23:27 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and my 53 year old utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the heaviest. That's even without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge benefit. Maybe my (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest body position and clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Wed Jun 25 10:17:00 2025
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest body position and clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world where
    milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can make the difference
    between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even though others may _appear_ to be in the same position. Nuances count more at higher speeds.
    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Thu Jun 26 17:13:59 2025
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https:// live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Jun 26 19:45:41 2025
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Catrike Ryder on Thu Jun 26 23:55:57 2025
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but IÂ’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isnÂ’t something that will just affect the professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    No but number of manufacturers will keep to the UCI rules, as some will be raced and all that.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman


    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Thu Jun 26 20:08:14 2025
    On 26 Jun 2025 23:55:57 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I?d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn?t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    No but number of manufacturers will keep to the UCI rules, as some will be >raced and all that.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman


    Roger Merriman

    It seems to me that a handlbar maker could make different lengths, and
    if a new bike comes with longer bars than you want, it's awfully easy
    to change them.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Catrike Ryder on Thu Jun 26 20:01:55 2025
    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Thu Jun 26 20:08:13 2025
    On 6/26/2025 8:02 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/26/2025 6:13 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-
    not- uci- compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike
    and my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d
    suggest body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because
    I pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also
    try to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-
    built handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a
    vaguely aero shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular
    box with sharp edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a
    boxy front bag can aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of
    the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-
    cycling/

    The new rules seem nuts to me. Seems like penalizing small
    riders, especially women, so the big guys are not too
    aerodynamic.

    BTW, narrow handlebars make me think about this point within
    this video:
    <https://youtu.be/Vn29DvMITu4?list=RDVn29DvMITu4&t=76>

    And it's a bit amazing how the market has changed since that
    was made. I mean, spending $5000 on a bike?


    UCI is a blight on cycling generally and competitive cycling
    in particular. I can't think of anything positive they have
    contributed. Ever.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Jun 27 04:41:52 2025
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Catrike Ryder on Fri Jun 27 09:29:01 2025
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 26 Jun 2025 23:55:57 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I?d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn?t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    No but number of manufacturers will keep to the UCI rules, as some will be >> raced and all that.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman


    Roger Merriman

    It seems to me that a handlbar maker could make different lengths, and
    if a new bike comes with longer bars than you want, it's awfully easy
    to change them.

    Mostly though not always as some are one piece things that make fit and replacement let alone replacement cables not impossible but definitely more tedious.
    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman


    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John B.@21:1/5 to Soloman@old.bikers.org on Fri Jun 27 02:43:49 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to John B. on Fri Jun 27 11:01:38 2025
    John B. <jbslocomb@fictitious.site> wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but IÂ’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isnÂ’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)

    Out of interest why?

    There is an argument within disk brakes that absolute power is less
    important, within reason as lever pull/weight, the Maven aka SRAM’s most powerful brake has reportedly a fairly stiff lever and so is more rider fatiguing than other options.
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to John B. on Fri Jun 27 07:48:25 2025
    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust for
    their organizations as cyclists do for UCI.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to jbslocomb@fictitious.site on Fri Jun 27 09:16:28 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 02:43:49 -0700, John B.
    <jbslocomb@fictitious.site> wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol >marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)

    I understand that there's a need to keep it fair in competitive
    events, but it seems to me like many sanctioning bodies have gone way
    to far to eliminate individuality.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Catrike Ryder on Fri Jun 27 08:43:20 2025
    On 6/27/2025 8:16 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 02:43:49 -0700, John B.
    <jbslocomb@fictitious.site> wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)

    I understand that there's a need to keep it fair in competitive
    events, but it seems to me like many sanctioning bodies have gone way
    to far to eliminate individuality.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And therefore innovation; c.f. Oscar Egg, Greg Lemond, Chris
    Bordman et al.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Jun 27 10:02:18 2025
    On 6/26/2025 9:02 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/26/2025 6:13 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not- uci-
    compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and my 53
    year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost everyone in our
    club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the heaviest. That's >>>>>> even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge benefit.
    Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest body
    position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world where
    milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can make the
    difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even though others
    may _appear_ to be in the same position. Nuances count more at
    higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I pay
    attention to that factor. When coasting even on the hoods, I pull my
    elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try to avoid loose flappy
    clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built handlebar
    bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero shape, as opposed to
    the typical rectangular box with sharp edges. But ISTR some data
    claiming even a boxy front bag can aid aerodynamics by shielding
    parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    The new rules seem nuts to me. Seems like penalizing small riders,
    especially women, so the big guys are not too aerodynamic.

    BTW, narrow handlebars make me think about this point within this video: <https://youtu.be/Vn29DvMITu4?list=RDVn29DvMITu4&t=76>

    And it's a bit amazing how the market has changed since that was made. I mean, spending $5000 on a bike?


    $5K? Where have you been?

    https://www.specialized.com/us/en/s-works-tarmac-sl8-shimano-dura-ace-di2/p/4221536?color=5430674-4221536

    https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/bikes/road-bikes/performance-road-bikes/madone/madone-slr/madone-slr-9-axs-gen-8/p/46151/?colorCode=reddark

    https://www.cannondale.com/en-ca/bikes/road/endurance/synapse-carbon/ synapse-lab71-smartsense

    That Cdale is supposed to retail for $22K.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Jun 27 09:58:01 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:43:20 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 8:16 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 02:43:49 -0700, John B.
    <jbslocomb@fictitious.site> wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not- >>>>>>>>>>>> uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and >>>>>>>>>>> my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/ >>>>>>
    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they >>>> seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)

    I understand that there's a need to keep it fair in competitive
    events, but it seems to me like many sanctioning bodies have gone way
    to far to eliminate individuality.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And therefore innovation; c.f. Oscar Egg, Greg Lemond, Chris
    Bordman et al.

    I don't follow automobile racing either, but it seems to me that all
    the cars in Nascar and F1 are almost identical except for the paint.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Jun 27 19:15:02 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust for
    their organizations as cyclists do for UCI.


    I think they have far less regulation with MTB stuff and certainly culture,
    I mean look at how much a MTB has changed from the 90’s it’s light and day, vs road bike is much less changed.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to frkrygow@sbcglobal.net on Fri Jun 27 15:49:07 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 15:03:04 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 10:02 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/26/2025 9:02 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    BTW, narrow handlebars make me think about this point within this video: >>> <https://youtu.be/Vn29DvMITu4?list=RDVn29DvMITu4&t=76>

    And it's a bit amazing how the market has changed since that was made.
    I mean, spending $5000 on a bike?


    $5K? Where have you been?

    https://www.specialized.com/us/en/s-works-tarmac-sl8-shimano-dura-ace-
    di2/p/4221536?color=5430674-4221536

    https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/bikes/road-bikes/performance-road-
    bikes/madone/madone-slr/madone-slr-9-axs-gen-8/p/46151/?colorCode=reddark

    https://www.cannondale.com/en-ca/bikes/road/endurance/synapse-carbon/
    synapse-lab71-smartsense

    That Cdale is supposed to retail for $22K.

    Our tricycle rider has absolutely no understanding of sarcasm.
    Obviously, $5000 is not unusual for a good bike these days, but it was a
    lot when that video was made.

    I guess I should have labeled my question as sarcasm, for his benefit.
    My apologies.

    Krygowski is so obsessed with me that he thinks I replied to him when
    I haven't. I must be on his mind every waking moment...

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to frkrygow@sbcglobal.net on Fri Jun 27 16:11:00 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 15:28:54 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 8:48 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not- >>>>>>>>>>>> uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and >>>>>>>>>>> my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/ >>>>>>
    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they >>>> seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust for their
    organizations as cyclists do for UCI.

    :-) Some might say that proves shooters are meek people who blindly
    obey the rules!

    (I'm not really saying that. Just riffing on Mr. Independent's comment.)

    As I said. Krygowski snipped, "I understand that there's a need to
    keep it fair in competitive events, but it seems to me like many
    sanctioning bodies have gone way to far to eliminate individuality."

    The poor witless wussy has trouble responding to what I really say....

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Jun 27 15:45:45 2025
    On 6/27/2025 2:28 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 8:48 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi
    <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi
    <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-
    are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring
    bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d
    suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional
    world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count,
    it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply
    because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I
    also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large,
    self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a
    vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box
    with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front
    bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's
    body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same
    reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-
    road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just
    affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and
    sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make
    what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI
    until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked
    them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even
    dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really
    dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who
    blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial.
    Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force
    needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust
    for their organizations as cyclists do for UCI.

    :-)  Some might say that proves shooters are meek people who
    blindly obey the rules!

    (I'm not really saying that. Just riffing on Mr.
    Independent's comment.)


    [also lightheartedly]

    What's a professional cyclist gonna do? Throw his water
    bottle at an official?

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Jun 27 17:00:31 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 15:45:45 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 2:28 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 8:48 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi
    <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi
    <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-
    are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring
    bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d
    suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional
    world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count,
    it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply
    because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I
    also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large,
    self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a
    vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box
    with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front
    bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's
    body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same
    reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-
    road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just
    affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and
    sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make
    what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI
    until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked
    them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even
    dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really
    dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who
    blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial.
    Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force
    needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust
    for their organizations as cyclists do for UCI.

    :-)  Some might say that proves shooters are meek people who
    blindly obey the rules!

    (I'm not really saying that. Just riffing on Mr.
    Independent's comment.)


    [also lightheartedly]

    What's a professional cyclist gonna do? Throw his water
    bottle at an official?

    If they got together and stood up to them, I might watch *that*.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John B.@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Jun 27 18:13:38 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 07:48:25 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-
    uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and
    my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest
    body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/

    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they
    seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust for
    their organizations as cyclists do for UCI.

    Well, they could go back to the pre 1900 days when cheating was nearly universal (:-)

    1904, Maurice Garin won the Tour de France. However, that title was later revoked because he and other riders had taken a train for part of a stage of the race.
    --
    cheers,

    John B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to John B. on Fri Jun 27 20:27:57 2025
    On 6/27/2025 8:13 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 07:48:25 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not- >>>>>>>>>>>> uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and >>>>>>>>>>> my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest >>>>>>>>>> body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can
    aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/ >>>>>>
    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the
    professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they >>>> seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what
    kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people
    who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol
    marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust for
    their organizations as cyclists do for UCI.

    Well, they could go back to the pre 1900 days when cheating was nearly universal (:-)
    1904, Maurice Garin won the Tour de France. However, that title was later revoked because he and other riders had taken a train for part of a stage of the race.
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Oh, you mean like pro racing today and every other sport as
    well...

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Sat Jun 28 08:03:14 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 8:13 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 07:48:25 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:41:52 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>
    On 6/26/2025 6:45 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:13:59 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 6/25/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 10:17 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not- >>>>>>>>>>>>> uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and >>>>>>>>>>>> my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost
    everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the
    heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge
    benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial
    explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I’d suggest >>>>>>>>>>> body position and
    clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world
    where milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can
    make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even
    though others may _appear_ to be in the same position.
    Nuances count more at higher speeds.

    I may be in a slightly more aero position, simply because I
    pay attention to that factor. When coasting even on the
    hoods, I pull my elbows and knees inward a bit. I also try
    to avoid loose flappy clothing.

    I think some of my advantage is due to my large, self-built
    handlebar bag. I took some pains to give it a vaguely aero
    shape, as opposed to the typical rectangular box with sharp
    edges. But ISTR some data claiming even a boxy front bag can >>>>>>>>> aid aerodynamics by shielding parts of the rider's body.

    Old photo from a tour: <https://
    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51802231601_a577378af4_c.jpg>

    I also like the old Tailwind panniers, for the same reason.



    Further discussion this afternoon:

    https://bikerumor.com/uci-clairfies-bar-width-rules-road-cycling/ >>>>>>>
    I don't understand the statement:

    "Unfortunately, that isn’t something that will just affect the >>>>>>> professionals; it will soon trickle down to you too."

    Does the UCI dictate what manufacturers can make and sell?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Not directly.

    But bike makers and more importantly parts makers make what
    sells in efficient production volume. Chop off 50% of a
    small market item and product selection changes fast.

    Not being a bicycle racing fan, I never heard of the UCI until I
    joined this forum and saw it mentioned here. I looked them up and they >>>>> seem like a bunch of dictatorial, nit-pickers. They even dictate what >>>>> kind of socks the racers can wear.

    Of course, I don't like rules in general. I really dislike the people >>>>> who make them and don't understand the people who blindly obey them

    But all registry groups can be described as dictatorial. Why in pistol >>>> marksmanship competitions they even dictate the force needed to pull
    the trigger :-)
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Well, yes that's true.

    But IME shooters don't hold visceral hatred and disgust for
    their organizations as cyclists do for UCI.

    Well, they could go back to the pre 1900 days when cheating was nearly
    universal (:-)
    1904, Maurice Garin won the Tour de France. However, that title was
    later revoked because he and other riders had taken a train for part of
    a stage of the race.
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    Oh, you mean like pro racing today and every other sport as
    well...


    I believe the scale at 1900 was rather more intense! Though the TDF was
    more of long distance single rider event, and plenty of gravel roads!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)