• Why Nonexistent Gravitational Waves Deflect like Photons

    From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 31 01:45:36 2023
    Photons are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. Gravitational waves are not, Einsteinians used to teach:

    "Unlike light, gravitational waves don’t care about matter in any way. You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a lens, prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and they will continue to propagate
    at the speed of gravity." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/12/24/how-gravitational-waves-might-wind-up-proving-einstein-wrong/

    But LIGO fakers found it suitable to fake near-simultaneous arrival of gravitational waves and photons, "from the same location of the sky", which forces the nonexistent gravitational waves to travel exactly like photons:

    "On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.
    si.edu/newsdesk/releases/astronomers-see-light-show-associated-gravitational-waves

    So Einsteinians had to change their minds and now they fiercely prove that gravitational waves and photons deflect in the same way:

    "We establish at high confidence (significantly greater than 5σ) that the gravitational waves of GW 170817 underwent gravitational deflection to arrive within 1.7 seconds of the photons." https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.01710.pdf

    See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lou@21:1/5 to Pentcho Valev on Tue Jan 31 05:54:58 2023
    On Tuesday, 31 January 2023 at 09:45:38 UTC, Pentcho Valev wrote:
    Photons are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. Gravitational waves are not, Einsteinians used to teach:

    "Unlike light, gravitational waves don’t care about matter in any way. You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a lens, prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and they will continue to propagate
    at the speed of gravity." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/12/24/how-gravitational-waves-might-wind-up-proving-einstein-wrong/

    But LIGO fakers found it suitable to fake near-simultaneous arrival of gravitational waves and photons, "from the same location of the sky", which forces the nonexistent gravitational waves to travel exactly like photons:

    Nice point Pentcho.
    "On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://
    www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/astronomers-see-light-show-associated-gravitational-waves

    And “weak pulse” is an overstatement. Look at the fermi data. It was background noise.

    So Einsteinians had to change their minds and now they fiercely prove that gravitational waves and photons deflect in the same way:

    "We establish at high confidence (significantly greater than 5σ) that the gravitational waves of GW 170817 underwent gravitational deflection to arrive within 1.7 seconds of the photons." https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.01710.pdf

    See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 31 16:57:42 2023
    LIGO fakers quickly realized that the hand-in-hand travel of gravitational waves and their electromagnetic counterpart was a mortal trap, and decided to stop this fake in all its variations. No electromagnetic counterpart anymore:

    "The first such observation, which took place in August of 2017, made history for being the first time that both gravitational waves and light were detected from the same cosmic event. The April 25 merger, by contrast, did not result in any light being
    detected." https://phys.org/news/2020-01-ligo-virgo-gravitational-network-neutron-star.html

    "You might wonder why we haven’t seen knockout detections of electromagnetic radiation accompanying gravitational waves since the August 2017 discovery. Unfortunately, we probably just got lucky that time. “It was nearby, well-localized in space, and
    had everything going for it,” Berger said." https://gizmodo.com/mystery-deepens-around-newly-detected-ripples-in-space-1837581646

    "The first binary neutron star to be discovered in GWs, GW170817, came with a bright electromagnetic counterpart...Unfortunately most binary mergers, and in particular binary black hole (BBH) mergers, do not have associated electromagnetic counterparts."
    https://www.ligo.org/science/Publication-O3Cosmology/

    More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lou@21:1/5 to Pentcho Valev on Wed Feb 1 02:10:56 2023
    On Wednesday, 1 February 2023 at 00:57:44 UTC, Pentcho Valev wrote:
    LIGO fakers quickly realized that the hand-in-hand travel of gravitational waves and their electromagnetic counterpart was a mortal trap, and decided to stop this fake in all its variations. No electromagnetic counterpart anymore:

    "The first such observation, which took place in August of 2017, made history for being the first time that both gravitational waves and light were detected from the same cosmic event. The April 25 merger, by contrast, did not result in any light being
    detected." https://phys.org/news/2020-01-ligo-virgo-gravitational-network-neutron-star.html

    If one looks into the so called “light detection” for the aug 2017 wave,
    it was a total fabrication on the relativists part.
    Look at various GCN on that GW . Like for instance gcn21513, the area to be searched for any transient was so large , in tens of degrees coverage in the sky
    that anything could be found to satisfy a light detection. A list of over 40 galaxies
    to search, for any transient was published in one gcn. And that was only the best
    candidates out of probably thousands in that search area.
    Multiple false alarms on new objects were found that turned out to be nothing of interest. To pretend the transient they eventually settled on was
    evidence was pure fantasy and lies from the GW community.
    Which is why they didn’t bother trying to pretend to find an imaginary optical transient with the next few faked LIGO GW signals.

    "You might wonder why we haven’t seen knockout detections of electromagnetic radiation accompanying gravitational waves since the August 2017 discovery. Unfortunately, we probably just got lucky that time. “It was nearby, well-localized in space,
    and had everything going for it,” Berger said." https://gizmodo.com/mystery-deepens-around-newly-detected-ripples-in-space-1837581646

    "The first binary neutron star to be discovered in GWs, GW170817, came with a bright electromagnetic counterpart...Unfortunately most binary mergers, and in particular binary black hole (BBH) mergers, do not have associated electromagnetic counterparts.
    " https://www.ligo.org/science/Publication-O3Cosmology/

    More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)